Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Fieldscape.jpg: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Holly Cheng (talk | contribs) comment |
|||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
*****Many of his other pictures have Creative Commons liscenses. I doubt that he would selectively pick some to share, and some not to share (however, I could be wrong). [[User:Nauticashades|Nauticashades]] 15:14, 12 September 2006 (UTC) |
*****Many of his other pictures have Creative Commons liscenses. I doubt that he would selectively pick some to share, and some not to share (however, I could be wrong). [[User:Nauticashades|Nauticashades]] 15:14, 12 September 2006 (UTC) |
||
******[http://www.flickr.com/people/vs/ His profile page] says clearly, "Some of my photos are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5." So he does pick and choose which ones to share and those he shares are under an incompatible license anyway. <span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''[[User:Howcheng|<span style="color: #33C;">howch</span>]][[WP:EA|<span style="color:#0F0">''e''</span>]][[User:Howcheng|<span style="color:#33C">ng</span>]]''' <small>{[[User talk:Howcheng|chat]]}</small></span> 18:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC) |
******[http://www.flickr.com/people/vs/ His profile page] says clearly, "Some of my photos are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5." So he does pick and choose which ones to share and those he shares are under an incompatible license anyway. <span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''[[User:Howcheng|<span style="color: #33C;">howch</span>]][[WP:EA|<span style="color:#0F0">''e''</span>]][[User:Howcheng|<span style="color:#33C">ng</span>]]''' <small>{[[User talk:Howcheng|chat]]}</small></span> 18:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC) |
||
*******Oh, I did not see that page. Well then, let's hope that he agrees to let us use them in an email. [[User:Nauticashades|Nauticashades]] 12:38, 13 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
*'''Ineligible''' -- licensing. <span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''[[User:Howcheng|<span style="color: #33C;">howch</span>]][[WP:EA|<span style="color:#0F0">''e''</span>]][[User:Howcheng|<span style="color:#33C">ng</span>]]''' <small>{[[User talk:Howcheng|chat]]}</small></span> 00:15, 12 September 2006 (UTC) |
*'''Ineligible''' -- licensing. <span style="font-family:Verdana;">'''[[User:Howcheng|<span style="color: #33C;">howch</span>]][[WP:EA|<span style="color:#0F0">''e''</span>]][[User:Howcheng|<span style="color:#33C">ng</span>]]''' <small>{[[User talk:Howcheng|chat]]}</small></span> 00:15, 12 September 2006 (UTC) |
||
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
<!-- additional votes go above this line --> |
Revision as of 12:38, 13 September 2006
Great picture which also describes perfectly Mt. Rainier National Park. Good choice for FP. This photo is of a peak just east of Chinook Pass. It appears in Mount Rainier National Park and it's taken by: Victor Szalvay
- Nominate and support. - Arad 16:54, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support Its beautiful and descriptive. Some haze around the base of the peak, but this is unavoidable and forgivable. My only question: Is it really Mt. Ranier? I've never seen any photos with so little ice and snow on the summitt. SteveHopson 17:07, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- My fault, I changed it (The Description). Arad 17:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Per SteveHopson. Nauticashades 18:28, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. Odd framing; this one seems (to me) like it should have been a landscape or square composition. Haze in mid-foreground seems strange -- I think it could be eliminated in Photoshop, but that might throw off the near foreground and top of the photo. Uninteresting foreground. -- Moondigger 19:35, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
- Support meets my personal quality standards and in my opinion those of the FP criteria. Cat-five - talk 04:17, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: It's presently not used in Mount Rainier National Park, because it's uncertain if the mountain is in the park or not. The only peak east of Chinook Pass that's in the park is Naches Peak, and the map I've got doesn't show it as being that heavily forested. --Carnildo 04:20, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose: The image's source [1] says that it is copyrighted. --Hetar 04:59, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
The second page of his userpage [2] clearly states, "© This photo is public."Nauticashades 15:12, 11 September 2006 (UTC)- That isn't a licensing statement. If he intends it to refer to licensing, he should make that clear with a valid licensing statement. The "©" symbol is contrary to the free licensing schemes Wikipedia requires. "This photo is public" could mean other things unrelated to copyright or licensing. -- Moondigger 20:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- On Flickr, "public" means anyone can see it, as opposed to "private" photos which are limited to people the user specifically designates. howcheng {chat} 21:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- Many of his other pictures have Creative Commons liscenses. I doubt that he would selectively pick some to share, and some not to share (however, I could be wrong). Nauticashades 15:14, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- His profile page says clearly, "Some of my photos are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5." So he does pick and choose which ones to share and those he shares are under an incompatible license anyway. howcheng {chat} 18:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, I did not see that page. Well then, let's hope that he agrees to let us use them in an email. Nauticashades 12:38, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
- His profile page says clearly, "Some of my photos are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5." So he does pick and choose which ones to share and those he shares are under an incompatible license anyway. howcheng {chat} 18:38, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Many of his other pictures have Creative Commons liscenses. I doubt that he would selectively pick some to share, and some not to share (however, I could be wrong). Nauticashades 15:14, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- On Flickr, "public" means anyone can see it, as opposed to "private" photos which are limited to people the user specifically designates. howcheng {chat} 21:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- That isn't a licensing statement. If he intends it to refer to licensing, he should make that clear with a valid licensing statement. The "©" symbol is contrary to the free licensing schemes Wikipedia requires. "This photo is public" could mean other things unrelated to copyright or licensing. -- Moondigger 20:41, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- Ineligible -- licensing. howcheng {chat} 00:15, 12 September 2006 (UTC)