Wikipedia - User contributions [en]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Lepage

2014-05-21T23:16:41Z

*SM*:

===[[Camille Lepage]]===
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}}

:{{la|Camille Lepage}} – (<includeonly>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Lepage|View AfD]]</includeonly><noinclude>[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 May 19#{{anchorencode:Camille Lepage}}|View log]]</noinclude>{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Camille_Lepage Stats])
:({{Find sources|Camille Lepage}})
Nice photojournalist, but mostly notable just for her recent unfortunate death. [[User:Damiens.rf|damiens.rf]] 15:50, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Africa|list of Africa-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 05:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/France|list of France-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 05:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Photography|list of Photography-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 05:48, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/News media|list of News media-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 05:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/People|list of People-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Gene93k|• Gene93k]] ([[User talk:Gene93k|talk]]) 05:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

* '''Delete''' Unable to find a reliable source about her before she dies. [[User:Lpele|Lpele]] ([[User talk:Lpele|talk]]) 16:52, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
* '''Strong keep''' I really don't get the "just for her recent unfortunate death" or "before she dies" point. '''There are sources''' (and good and reliable sources). The fact that these sources were published before of after her death is completely irrelevant. --[[User:Bsm15|Bsm15]] ([[User talk:Bsm15|talk]]) 17:49, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
** The point is that her notability is, at beast, a [[WP:1E]] case. --[[User:Damiens.rf|damiens.rf]] 21:51, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
* '''Strong keep''' She was known before her death for her work, winning several awards and being published by most of the greatest newspapers. Enought sources to make a good entry with a lot of informations, and not only her death. --[[User:Kormin|Kormin]] ([[User talk:Kormin|talk]]) 05:41, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
* '''Strong Delete'''. For Wikinews. The subject can't be about an encylopedic methodology. [[User:Suprememangaka|Suprememangaka]] ([[User talk:Suprememangaka|talk]]) 23:16, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Jacques Chirac

2012-12-12T13:20:41Z

*SM*:

{{Redirect|Chirac}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2012}}
{{Infobox officeholder
|name = Jacques Chirac
|image = ChiracUSA.jpg
|office = [[President of France]]
|primeminister = [[Alain Juppé]] [[Lionel Jospin]] [[Jean-Pierre Raffarin]] [[Dominique de Villepin]]
|term_start = 17 May 1995
|term_end = 16 May 2007
|predecessor = [[François Mitterrand]]
|successor = [[Nicolas Sarkozy]]
|office1 = [[Co-Princes of Andorra|Co-Prince of Andorra]]
|primeminister1 = [[Marc Forné Molné]] [[Albert Pintat]]
|term_start1 = 17 May 1995
|term_end1 = 16 May 2007
|predecessor1 = [[François Mitterrand]]
|successor1 = [[Nicolas Sarkozy]]
|office2 = [[Prime Minister of France]]
|president2 = [[François Mitterrand]]
|term_start2 = 20 March 1986
|term_end2 = 10 May 1988
|predecessor2 = [[Laurent Fabius]]
|successor2 = [[Michel Rocard]]
|president3 = [[Valéry Giscard d'Estaing]]
|term_start3 = 27 May 1974
|term_end3 = 26 August 1976
|predecessor3 = [[Pierre Messmer]]
|successor3 = [[Raymond Barre]]
|office4 = [[List of mayors of Paris|Mayor of Paris]]
|term_start4 = 20 March 1977
|term_end4 = 16 May 1995
|predecessor4 = Position established
|successor4 = [[Jean Tiberi]]
|office5 = [[Minister of the Interior (France)|Minister of the Interior]]
|primeminister5 = [[Pierre Messmer]]
|term_start5 = 27 February 1974
|term_end5 = 28 May 1974
|predecessor5 = [[Raymond Marcellin]]
|successor5 = [[Michel Poniatowski]]
|office6 = [[Ministry of Agriculture (France)|Minister of Agriculture]]
|primeminister6 = [[Pierre Messmer]]
|term_start6 = 7 July 1972
|term_end6 = 27 February 1974
|predecessor6 = [[Michel Cointat]]
|successor6 = [[Raymond Marcellin]]
|birth_date = {{birth date and age|1932|11|29|df=y}}
|birth_place = Paris, [[French Third Republic|France]]
|death_date =
|death_place =
|party = [[French Communist Party|Communist Party]] (Before 1962) [[Union for the New Republic]] (1962–1968) [[Union of Democrats for the Republic]] (1968–1971) [[Rally for the Republic]] (1971–2002) [[Union for a Popular Movement]] (2002–present)
|spouse = [[Bernadette Chirac|Bernadette de Courcel]] (1956–present)
|children = 2 daughters
|alma_mater = [[Institut d'Études Politiques de Paris|Institute of Political Studies, Paris]] [[École nationale d'administration|National School of Administration]]
|religion = Roman Catholic
|signature = Jacques Chirac Signature.svg
}}
'''Jacques René Chirac''' ({{IPAc-en|icon|ʒ|ɑː|k|_|ʃ|ɨ|ˈ|r|æ|k}}; {{IPA-fr|ʒak ʃi.ʁak}}; born 29 November 1932) is a French politician who served as [[President of France]] from 1995 to 2007. He previously served as [[Prime Minister of France]] from 1974 to 1976 and from 1986 to 1988 (making him the only person to hold the position of Prime Minister twice under the [[French Fifth Republic|Fifth Republic]]), and as [[List of mayors of Paris|Mayor of Paris]] from 1977 to 1995.

After completing his [[DEA (former French degree)|DEA]] degree at the [[Institut d'études politiques de Paris]], a term at [[Harvard University]] and the [[École nationale d'administration]] (ENA), Chirac began his career as a high-level civil servant, and soon entered politics. He subsequently occupied various senior positions, including [[Minister of Agriculture (France)|Minister of Agriculture]], [[Minister of the Interior (France)|Minister of the Interior]], Prime Minister, [[Mayor of Paris]], and finally [[President of the French Republic]].

Chirac's internal policies included lower tax rates, the removal of [[price controls]], strong punishment for crime and terrorism, and business [[privatisation]].<ref>[http://www.iht.com/articles/1997/07/15/chirac.t.php Privatization Is Essential, Chirac Warns Socialists: Resisting Global Currents, France Sticks to Being French], ''International Herald Tribune''</ref> He also argued for more socially responsible [[economic policies]], and was elected in 1995 after campaigning on a platform of healing the "social rift" (''fracture sociale'').<ref name=Bonjour>{{cite web|url=http://www.bonjourlafrance.net/france-history/jacques-chirac.htm |title=Jacques Chirac President of France from 1995–2007 |publisher=Bonjourlafrance.net |accessdate=20 April 2010}}</ref> After less statist policy when he was Prime Minister (1986–1988), he changed his method. Then, his economic policies, based on ''[[dirigisme]]'', state-directed ideals, stood in opposition to the ''[[laissez-faire]]'' policies of the United Kingdom, which Chirac famously described as "[[Anglosphere|Anglo-Saxon]] [[neoliberalism|ultraliberalism]]".<ref name=a>{{cite book|last=Giavazzi|first=Francesco|coauthors=Alberto Alesina|year=2006|title=The Future of Europe: Reform Or Decline|page=125}}</ref>
Chirac is the second-longest serving President of France (two full terms, the first of seven years and the second of five years), after [[François Mitterrand]]. As President, he also served as an ''[[ex officio]]'' [[Co-Prince of Andorra]] and Grand Master of the French [[Légion d'honneur]].

On 15 December 2011, the Paris court declared him guilty of diverting public funds and abusing public confidence, and gave Chirac a two-year suspended prison sentence.

==Family, early life, education, and early career==
Chirac, born in the Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire clinic ([[5th arrondissement of Paris|Paris Ve]]), is the son of Abel François Chirac (1893–1968), a successful executive for an aircraft company,<ref name=Bonjour /> and Marie-Louise Valette (1902–1973), a housewife. His great grandparents on both sides were [[peasant]]s, but his two grandfathers were teachers from [[Sainte-Féréole]] in Corrèze. According to Chirac, his name "originates from the [[langue d'oc]], that of the troubadours, therefore that of poetry". He is a Roman Catholic.

Chirac was an only child (his elder sister, Jacqueline, died in infancy before his birth), and was educated in Paris at the [[Lycée Carnot]] and at the [[Lycée Louis-le-Grand]]. After his [[baccalauréat]], he served for three months as a sailor on a coal-transporter.{{citation needed|date=September 2011}}

Chirac played [[rugby union]] for [[CA Brive|Brive]]'s youth team, and also played at university level. He played [[Number 8 (rugby union)|no. 8]] and [[Second Row (rugby union)|second row]].<ref name=Famous>[http://wesclark.com/rrr/famous.html Famous Ruggers by Wes Clark and others]. Retrieved 19 August 2009.</ref>

In 1956, he married [[Bernadette Chirac|Bernadette Chodron de Courcel]], with whom he had two daughters: Laurence (born 4 March 1958) and Claude (14 January 1962). Claude has long worked as a [[public relations]] assistant and personal adviser,<ref name=b>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/europe/europetoday/letters/020321_jlaurenson.shtml |title=BBC World Service: "Letter from Paris – John Laurenson on Claude Chirac's crucial but understated electoral role". |publisher=BBC News |date=21 March 2002 |accessdate=20 April 2010}}</ref> while Laurence, who suffered from [[anorexia nervosa]] in her youth, does not participate in the political activities of her father.<ref name=c>Colin Randall, [http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/12/07/wchir07.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/12/07/ixworld.html "Chirac's wife tells of anorexic daughter's death wish"]. ''[[Daily Telegraph]]''. 12 July 2004</ref> Chirac is the grandfather of Martin Rey-Chirac by the relationship of Claude with French [[judoka]] [[Thierry Rey]]. Jacques and Bernadette Chirac also have a foster daughter, [[Anh Dao Traxel]].

[[File:Jacques chirac corrèze 2.jpg|thumb|left|Chirac (right) in the 1960s]]
Inspired by General [[Charles de Gaulle]], Chirac started to pursue a civil service career in the 1950s. During this period, he joined the [[French Communist Party]], sold copies of ''[[L'Humanité]]'', and took part in meetings of a communist cell.<ref name=d>''[[France 3]]'', 12 November 1993</ref> In 1950, he signed the [[Soviet Union|Soviet]]-inspired [[Stockholm Appeal]] for the abolition of [[nuclear weapons]] – which led him to be questioned when he applied for his first visa to the United States.<ref name=e>[http://web.archive.org/web/20080608185416/http://www.humanite.fr/1995-05-08_Articles_-Jacques-Chirac-sabre-au-clair Jacques Chirac, sabre au clair]. ''L'Humanité'' 8 May 1995 (in French)</ref>

In 1953, after graduating from "[[Sciences Po]]" (more formally known as the [[Paris Institute of Political Studies]]), he attended [[Harvard University]]'s summer school, before entering the ENA, the [[Grandes écoles|Grande école]] [[École nationale d'administration|National School of Administration]], which trains France's top civil servants, in 1957.

Chirac trained as a reserve military officer in [[armoured warfare|armoured cavalry]] at [[Saumur]], where he was ranked first in his year.<ref name=f>[http://web.archive.org/web/20061123131215/http://gouvernement.fr/acteurs/premier_ministre/histoire_chefs_gouvernement_28/jacques_chirac_55/ La biographie de Jacques Chirac]. Portail du Gouvernement – site du Premier ministre. 27 July 2004</ref> He then volunteered to fight in the [[Algerian War]], using personal connections to be sent despite the reservations of his superiors. His superiors did not want to make him an officer because they suspected he had communist leanings.<ref name=g>Emmanuel Hecht and François Vey ''Chirac de A à Z, dictionnaire critique et impertinent'', A. Michel, 1995, ISBN 2-226-07664-6</ref> After leaving the ENA in 1959, he became a civil servant in the Court of Auditors.

==Early political career, Cabinet Minister==
In April 1962, Chirac was appointed head of the personal staff of Prime Minister [[Georges Pompidou]]. This appointment launched Chirac's political career. Pompidou considered Chirac his [[protégé]], and referred to him as "my bulldozer" for his skill at getting things done. The nickname "Le Bulldozer" caught on in French political circles. Chirac still maintains this reputation. In 1995 an anonymous British diplomat said Chirac "cuts through the crap and comes straight to the point...It's refreshing, although you have to put your seat belt on when you work with him".{{Citation needed|date=September 2008}}

At Pompidou's suggestion, Chirac ran as a [[Gaullist]] for a seat in the [[French National Assembly|National Assembly]] in 1967. He was elected deputy for his home [[Corrèze]] ''département'', a stronghold of the left. This surprising victory in the context of a Gaullist ebb permitted him to enter the government as [[Minister of Social Affairs (France)|Minister of Social Affairs]]. Although Chirac was well-situated in de Gaulle's entourage, being related by marriage to the general's sole companion at the time of the [[Appeal of 18 June]] 1940, he was more of a "Pompidolian" than a "Gaullist". When student and worker unrest rocked France in [[May 1968 in France|May 1968]], Chirac played a central role in negotiating a truce. Then, as state secretary of economy (1968–1971), he worked closely with [[Valéry Giscard d'Estaing]], who headed the ministry of economy and finance.

After some months in the ministry of relations with Parliament, Chirac's first high-level post came in 1972 when he became [[Minister of Agriculture (France)|Minister of Agriculture]] and Rural Development under Pompidou, who had been elected president in 1969, after de Gaulle retired. Chirac quickly earned a reputation as a champion of French farmers' interests, and first attracted international attention when he assailed U.S., [[West German]], and [[European Commission]] agricultural policies which conflicted with French interests.

On 27 February 1974, after the resignation of [[Raymond Marcellin]], Chirac was appointed [[Minister of the Interior (France)|Minister of the Interior]]. On 21 March 1974, he cancelled the [[SAFARI]] project due to privacy concerns after its existence was revealed by ''[[Le Monde]]''. From March 1974, he was entrusted by President Pompidou with preparations for the presidential election then scheduled for 1976. These elections were moved forward because of Pompidou's sudden death on 2 April 1974.

Chirac vainly attempted to rally Gaullists behind Prime minister [[Pierre Messmer]]. [[Jacques Chaban-Delmas]] announced his candidacy in spite of the disapproval of the "Pompidolians". Chirac and others published the ''call of the 43'' in favour of Giscard d'Estaing, the leader of the non-Gaullist part of the parliamentary majority. Giscard d'Estaing was elected as Pompidou's successor after France's most competitive election campaign in years. In return, the new president chose Chirac to lead the cabinet.

==Prime Minister (1974–1976)==
When [[Valéry Giscard d'Estaing|Giscard]] became president, he nominated Chirac as [[Prime Minister of France|prime minister]] on 27 May 1974, in order to reconcile the "Giscardian" and "non-Giscardian" factions of the parliamentary majority. At the age of 41, Chirac stood out as the very model of the ''jeunes loups'' ("young wolves") of French politics, but he was faced with the hostility of the "Barons of Gaullism" who considered him a traitor for his role during the previous presidential campaign. In December 1974, he took the lead of the [[Gaullist Party|Union of Democrats for the Republic]] (UDR) against the will of its more senior personalities.

As prime minister, Chirac quickly set about persuading the Gaullists that, despite the social reforms proposed by President Giscard, the basic tenets of Gaullism, such as national and European independence, would be retained. Chirac was advised by Pierre Juillet and [[Marie-France Garaud]], two former advisers of Pompidou. These two organised the campaign against Chaban-Delmas in 1974. They advocated a clash with Giscard d'Estaing because they thought his policy bewildered the conservative electorate. Citing Giscard's unwillingness to give him authority, Chirac resigned as Prime Minister in 1976. He proceeded to build up his political base among France's several conservative parties, with a goal of reconstituting the Gaullist UDR into a neo-Gaullist group, the Rally for the Republic (RPR). Chirac's first tenure as prime minister was also an arguably progressive one, with improvements in both the minimum wage and the social welfare system carried out during the course of his premiership.<ref>https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:isseic7swS4J:www.ces.fas.harvard.edu/conferences/nordic/papers/France.pdf+http://www.ces.fas.harvard.edu/conferences/nordic/papers/France&hl=en&gl=uk&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESjE-cEiAnEerRgsYBdxf20ohHeI39Wp8BVMJ8V9Yeq6jmyEXJ92RcPX44AQBfAfN_CVop5BahHR9viWYDmhLJcs7pjiQO14BVJWZUrEM-cOeV15NRVfONmI4z5TfkwgBcP2SFhI&sig=AHIEtbQXdDjodm_gae-WIu0h41nNJE_KkQ</ref>

==Osirak controversy==
At the invitation of [[Saddam Hussein]] (then vice-president of [[Iraq]], but ''de facto'' dictator), Chirac made an official visit to [[Baghdad]] in 1975. Saddam approved a deal granting French oil companies a number of privileges plus a 23 per cent share of Iraqi oil.<ref name=h>Taheri, Amir, [http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-taheri110402.asp "The Chirac Doctrine: France’s Iraq-war plan"], ''National Review Online'', 4 November 2002</ref> As part of this deal, France sold Iraq the [[Osirak]] MTR [[nuclear reactor]], a type designed to test nuclear materials.

The [[Israeli Air Force]] alleged that the reactor's imminent commissioning was a threat to its security, and pre-emptively bombed the Osirak reactor on 7 June 1981, provoking considerable anger from French officials and the United Nations Security Council.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/june/7/newsid_3014000/3014623.stm "1981: Israel bombs Baghdad nuclear reactor"], ''On this day – 7 June'', BBC News. Retrieved 5 September 2008</ref>

The Osirak deal became a controversy again in 2002–2003, when an international [[Multi-National Force – Iraq|military coalition]] led by the United States [[rationale for the Iraq War|invaded Iraq]] and forcibly removed Hussein's government from power. France led several other European countries in an effort to prevent the invasion. The Osirak deal was then used by parts of the American media to criticise the Chirac-led [[opposition to the Iraq War|opposition to starting a war in Iraq]],<ref>Joshua Glenn, [http://www.boston.com/news/packages/iraq/globe_stories/030203_chirac.htm Rebuilding Iraq], ''[[Boston Globe]]'', 2 March 2003</ref> despite French involvement in the [[Gulf War]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/2007/MR629.pdf |title=Out of Area or Out of Reach? European Military Support for Operations in Southwest Asia |format=PDF |accessdate=13 June 2010}}</ref>

==Mayor of Paris (1977–1995)==
After his departure from the cabinet, Chirac wanted to gain the leadership of the political right, in order to gain the French presidency in the future. The RPR was conceived as an electoral machine against President Giscard d'Estaing. Paradoxically, Chirac benefited from Giscard's decision to create the office of mayor in Paris, which had been in abeyance since the 1871 [[Paris Commune|Commune]], because the leaders of the [[French Third Republic|Third Republic]] (1871–1940) feared that having municipal control of the capital would give the mayor too much power. In 1977, Chirac stood as a candidate against [[Michel d'Ornano]], a close friend of the president, and he won. As mayor of Paris, Chirac's political influence grew. He held this post until 1995.

Chirac supporters point out that, as mayor, he provided programs to help the elderly, people with disabilities, and single mothers, and introduced the street-cleaning [[Motocrotte]],<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2002/apr/12/worlddispatch.jonhenley|title=Merde most foul|work=The Guardian |location=UK |date=12 April 2002|accessdate=29 July 2010 | first=Jon | last=Henley}}</ref> while providing incentives for businesses to stay in Paris. His opponents contend that he installed "clientelist" policies.

===Accused of corruption, convicted===
Chirac has been named in several cases of alleged corruption that occurred during his term as mayor, some of which have led to [[felony]] convictions of some politicians and aides. However, a controversial judicial decision in 1999 granted Chirac immunity while he was president of France. He refused to testify on these matters, arguing that it would be incompatible with his presidential functions. Investigations concerning the running of Paris's city hall, the number of whose municipal employees jumped by 25% from 1977 to 1995 (with 2,000 out of approximately 35,000 coming from the Corrèze region where Chirac had held his seat as deputy), as well as a lack of financial transparency (''marchés publics'') and the communal debt, were thwarted by the legal impossibility of questioning him as president. The conditions of the [[privatisation]] of the Parisian water network, acquired very cheaply by the [[Compagnie Générale des Eaux|Générale]] and the [[Suez Environnement|Lyonnaise des Eaux]], then directed by [[Jérôme Monod]], a close friend of Chirac, were also criticised. Furthermore, the satirical newspaper ''[[Le Canard enchaîné]]'' revealed the astronomical "food expenses" paid by the Parisian municipality (€15 million a year according to the ''Canard''), expenses managed by [[Roger Romani]] (who allegedly destroyed all archives of the period 1978–1993 during night raids in 1999–2000). Thousands of people were invited each year to receptions in the Paris city hall, while many political, media and artistic personalities were hosted in private flats owned by the city.<ref>Jean Guarrigues, professor at the University of [[Orléans]] (and author of ''Les Scandales de la République. De Panama à l'Affaire Elf'', Robert Laffon, 2004), "La dérive des affaires" in ''[[L'Histoire]]'' n° 313, October 2006, pp. 66–71 {{fr icon}}</ref>

Chirac's immunity from prosecution ended in May 2007, when he left office as president. In November 2007 a preliminary charge of misuse of public funds was filed against him.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/chirac-faces-investigation-into-misuse-of-public-cash-759026.html|title=Chirac faces investigation into 'misuse of public cash'|date=22 November 2007|work=The Independent |location=London |accessdate=6 July 2008 | first=John | last=Lichfield}}</ref> Chirac is said to be the first former French head of state to be formally placed under investigation for a crime.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.capital.fr/Actualite/Default.asp?source=RE&numero=270226&Cat=GEN|title=Le dossier judiciaire de Jacques Chirac s'alourdit|date=22 February 2008|work=Capital.fr|accessdate=6 July 2008|language=fr}}</ref> On 30 October 2009, a judge ordered Chirac to stand trial on [[embezzlement]] charges, dating back to his time as mayor of Paris.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/31/world/europe/31chirac.html|title=Frances Chirac Ordered to Face Trial|date=30 October 2009|author=Alan Cowell|work=The New York Times|accessdate=30 October 2009}}</ref>

On 15 December 2011, Chirac was found guilty in two related cases, involving 19 totally or partially fake jobs created for his benefit by the RPR Party, which he led as Paris mayor from 1977 to 1995. He was convicted of embezzling public funds, abuse of trust, and illegal [[conflict of interest]].<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/french-ex-president-chirac-convicted-of-corruption/2011/12/15/gIQAfp97vO_story.html|author=Edward Cody|title=Former French leader Jacques Chirac convicted of corruption for his Paris mayor days|date=16 December 2011|work=The Washington Post|accessdate=16 December 2011}}</ref>

{{See also|Corruption scandals in the Paris region}}

==Struggle for the right-wing leadership==
In 1978, he attacked the [[pro-European]] policy of [[Valéry Giscard d'Estaing]] (VGE), and made a nationalist turn with the December 1978 [[Call of Cochin]], initiated by his counsellors [[Marie-France Garaud]] and [[Pierre Juillet]], which had first been called by Pompidou. Hospitalised in Cochin hospital after a crash, he declared that "as always about the drooping of France, the pro-foreign party acts with its peaceable and reassuring voice". He appointed [[Ivan Blot]], an intellectual who would later join the [[National Front (France)|National Front]], as director of his campaigns for the [[European Parliament elections, 1979|1979 European election]].<ref name="Slama">[[:fr:Alain-Gérard Slama|Alain-Gérard Slama]], "Vous avez dit bonapartiste?" in ''L'Histoire'' n°313, October 2006, pp.60–63 {{fr icon}}</ref> After the poor results of the election, Chirac broke with Garaud and Juillet. His rivalry with Giscard d'Estaing intensified. Although it has been often interpreted by historians as the struggle between two rival French right-wing families (the [[Bonapartist]]s, represented by Chirac, and the [[Orleanist]]s, represented by VGE), both figures in fact were members of the Liberal, Orleanist tradition, according to historian Alain-Gérard Slama.<ref name="Slama"/> But the eviction of the Gaullist Barons and of President VGE convinced Chirac to assume a strong neo-Gaullist stance.

Chirac made his first run for president against Giscard d'Estaing in the [[French presidential election, 1981|1981 election]], thus splitting the centre-right vote. He was eliminated in the first round with 18% of the vote. He reluctantly supported Giscard in the second round. He refused to give instructions to the RPR voters but said that he supported the incumbent president "in a private capacity", which was almost like a ''de facto'' support of the [[French Socialist Party|Socialist Party]]'s (PS) candidate, [[François Mitterrand]], who was elected by a broad majority.

Giscard has always blamed Chirac for his defeat. He was told by Mitterrand, before his death, that the latter had dined with Chirac before the election. Chirac told the Socialist candidate that he wanted to "get rid of Giscard". In his memoirs, Giscard wrote that between the two rounds, he phoned the RPR headquarters. He passed himself off as a right-wing voter by changing his voice. The RPR employee advised him "certainly do not vote Giscard!". After 1981, the relationship between the two men became tense, with Giscard, even though he was in the same government coalition as Chirac, criticising Chirac's actions openly.

After the May 1981 presidential election, the right also lost the subsequent [[French legislative election, 1981|legislative election]] that year. However, as Giscard had been knocked out, Chirac appeared as the principal leader of the right-wing opposition. Due to his attacks against the economic policy of the Socialist government, he gradually aligned himself with prevailing economic liberal opinion, even though it did not correspond with Gaullist doctrine. While the far-right National Front grew, taking advantage of a [[proportional representation]] electoral law, he signed an electoral platform with the Giscardian (and more or less Christian Democrat) party [[Union for French Democracy]] (UDF).

==First "cohabitation" (1986–1988) and "desert crossing"==
[[File:Jacques Chirac mid-eighties.jpg|thumb|Chirac during his second term as Prime Minister]]
When the RPR/UDF right-wing coalition won a slight majority in the National Assembly in the [[French legislative election, 1986|1986 election]], Mitterrand (PS) appointed Chirac prime minister (though many in Mitterrand's inner circle lobbied him to choose [[Jacques Chaban-Delmas]] instead). This unprecedented power-sharing arrangement, known as [[cohabitation (government)|cohabitation]], gave Chirac the lead in domestic affairs. However, it is generally conceded that Mitterrand used the areas granted to the President of the Republic, or "reserved domains" of the Presidency, Defense and Foreign Affairs, to belittle his Prime Minister.

===Chirac's second ministry===
(20 March 1986 – 12 May 1988)
*'''Jacques Chirac''' – Prime Minister
*[[Jean-Bernard Raimond]] – Minister of Foreign Affairs
*[[André Giraud]] – Minister of Defence
*[[Charles Pasqua]] – Minister of the Interior
*[[Édouard Balladur]] – Minister of Economy, Finance, and Privatisation
*[[Alain Madelin]] – Minister of Industry, Tourism, Posts, and Telecommunications
*[[Philippe Séguin]] – Minister of Employment and Social Affairs
*[[Albin Chalandon]] – Minister of Justice
*[[René Monory]] – Minister of National Education
*[[François Léotard]] – Minister of Culture and Communications
*[[François Guillaume]] – Minister of Agriculture
*[[Bernard Pons]] – Minister of Overseas Departments and Territories
*[[Pierre Méhaignerie]] – Minister of Housing, Equipment, Regional Planning, and Transport
*[[André Rossinot]] – Minister of Relations with Parliament
*[[Michel Aurillac]] – Minister of Cooperation

Chirac's cabinet [[Privatization|sold many public companies]], renewing with the [[liberalisation]] initiated under [[Laurent Fabius]]'s Socialist government (1984–86 – in particular with Fabius' privatisation of the audiovisual sector, leading to the creation of [[Canal +]]), and abolished the [[solidarity tax on wealth]] (ISF), a symbolic tax on very high resources championed by Mitterrand's government. Elsewhere, the plan for university reform (plan Devaquet) caused a crisis in 1986 when a young man named [[Malik Oussekine]] (1964–1986) was killed by the police, leading to massive demonstrations and the proposal's withdrawal. It has been said during other student crises that this event strongly affected Jacques Chirac, who was hereafter careful about possible [[police violence]] during such demonstrations (i.e. maybe explaining part of the decision to "promulgate without applying" the [[First Employment Contract]] (CPE) after [[2006 labor protests in France|large student demonstrations against it]]).

One of his first acts concerning foreign policy was to call back [[Jacques Foccart]] (1913–1997), who had been de Gaulle's and his successors' leading counsellor for African matters, called by journalist [[Stephen Smith (journalist)|Stephen Smith]] the "father of all "networks" on the continent, at the time [in 1986] aged 72."<ref name="Smith">"Naufrage de la [[Françafrique]] – Le président a poursuivi une politique privilégiant les hommes forts au pouvoir.", [[Stephen Smith (journalist)|Stephen Smith]] in ''L'Histoire'' n°313, October 2006 (special issue on Chirac), p.70 {{fr icon}}</ref> Jacques Foccart, who had also co-founded the Gaullist ''[[Service d'Action Civique]]'' (SAC, dissolved by Mitterrand in 1982) along with Charles Pasqua, and who was a key component of the "[[Françafrique]]" system, was again called to the [[Elysée Palace]] when Chirac won the 1995 presidential election. Furthermore, confronted by [[anti-colonialism|anti-colonialist movements]] in [[New Caledonia]], Prime Minister Chirac ordered a military intervention against the separatists in the Ouvéa cave, leading to several tragic deaths. He allegedly refused any alliance with [[Jean-Marie Le Pen]]'s ''Front National''.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/04/24/1019441263037.html |title=Chirac labels 'racist' Le Pen as threat to nation's soul |work=The Age |location=Australia |date=25 April 2002 |accessdate=20 April 2010 | first=Harry | last=de Quetteville}}</ref>

===1988 presidential elections and afterwards===
Chirac ran against Mitterrand for a second time in the [[French presidential election, 1988|1988 election]]. He obtained 20 percent of the vote in the first round, but lost the second with only 46 percent. He resigned from the cabinet and the right lost the [[French legislative election, 1988|next legislative election]].

For the first time, his leadership over the RPR was challenged. [[Charles Pasqua]] and [[Philippe Séguin]] criticised his abandonment of Gaullist doctrines. On the right, a new generation of politicians, the "renovation men", accused Chirac and Giscard of being responsible for the electoral defeats. In 1992, convinced a man could not become President whilst advocating anti-European policies, he called for a "yes" vote in the referendum on the [[Maastricht Treaty]], against the opinion of Pasqua, Séguin and a majority of the RPR voters, who chose to vote "no".

While he still was mayor of Paris (since 1977), Chirac went to [[Abidjan]] (Côte d'Ivoire) where he supported [[Félix Houphouët-Boigny|President Houphouët-Boigny]] (1960–1993), although the latter was being called a "thief" by the local population. Chirac then declared that [[multiparty democracy|multipartism]] was a "kind of luxury."<ref name="Smith">"Naufrage de la Françafrique – Le président a poursuivi une politique privilégiant les hommes forts au pouvoir.", Stephen Smith in ''L'Histoire'' n°313, October 2006 (special issue on Chirac), p.70 {{fr icon}}</ref>

Nevertheless, the right won the [[French legislative election, 1993|1993 legislative election]]. Chirac announced that he did not want to come back as prime minister, suggesting the appointment of [[Edouard Balladur]], who had promised that he would not run for the presidency against Chirac in 1995. However, benefiting from positive polls, Balladur decided to be a presidential candidate, with the support of a majority of right-wing politicians. Chirac broke at that time with a number of friends and allies, including Charles Pasqua, [[Nicolas Sarkozy]], etc., who supported Balladur's candidacy. A small group of "fidels" would remain with him, including [[Alain Juppé]] and [[Jean-Louis Debré]]. When Nicolas Sarkozy became President in 2007, Juppé was one of the few "chiraquiens" to serve in François Fillon's government.

==First term as President (1995–2002)==
[[File:Clintonchirac.jpg|thumb|left|Chirac with [[Bill Clinton]] outside the [[Élysée Palace]] in Paris, June 1999]]

During the [[French presidential election, 1995|1995 presidential campaign]], Chirac criticised the "sole thought" (''[[pensée unique]]'') of [[neoliberalism]] represented by his challenger on the right and promised to reduce the "social fracture", placing himself more to the center and thus forcing Balladur to [[Political radicalism|radicalise]] himself. Ultimately, he obtained more votes than Balladur in the first round (20.8 percent), and then defeated the [[Socialist Party (France)|Socialist]] candidate [[Lionel Jospin]] in the second round (52.6 percent).

Chirac was elected on a platform of tax cuts and job programs, but his policies did little to ease the labor strikes during his first months in office. On the domestic front, neo-liberal economic austerity measures introduced by Chirac and his conservative prime minister [[Alain Juppé]], including budgetary cutbacks, proved highly unpopular. At about the same time, it became apparent that Juppé and others had obtained preferential conditions for public housing, as well as other perks. At the year's end Chirac faced [[1995 strikes in France|major workers' strikes]] which turned itself, in November–December 1995, into a [[general strike]], one of the largest since May 1968. The demonstrations were largely pitted against Juppé's plan on the reform of pensions, and led to the dismissal of the latter.

Shortly after taking office, Chirac{{spaced ndash}}undaunted by international protests by environmental groups{{spaced ndash}}insisted upon the resumption of [[nuclear weapons and France|nuclear tests at Mururoa Atoll]] in [[French Polynesia]] in 1995, a few months before signing the [[Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.acronym.org.uk/a09comp.htm |title=Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty |publisher=Acronym.org.uk |accessdate=20 April 2010}}</ref> Reacting to criticism, Chirac said, "You only have to look back at 1935...There were people then who were against France arming itself, and look what happened." On 1 February 1996, Chirac announced that France had ended "once and for all" its nuclear testing, intending to accede to the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.

Elected as President of the Republic, he refused to discuss the existence of French military bases in Africa, despite requests by the Ministry of Defence and the ''[[Quai d'Orsay]]'' (Ministry of Foreign Affairs).<ref name="Smith" /> The French Army thus remained in Côte d'Ivoire as well as in [[Omar Bongo]]'s [[Gabon]].
[[File:Chirac and Schroeder on the Neva.jpg|thumb|Chirac with German Federal Chancellor [[Gerhard Schröder]].]]
[[File:Vladimir Putin 2 July 2001-5.jpg|thumb|right|Chirac with then-Russian President [[Vladimir Putin]] in 2001]]
[[File:Bush and Chirac.jpg|thumb|Chirac and [[George W. Bush]] during the [[27th G8 summit]], 21 July 2001.]]

In 1997, Chirac dissolved parliament for early legislative elections in a gamble designed to bolster support for his conservative economic program. But instead, it created an uproar, and his power was weakened by the subsequent backlash. The Socialist Party (PS), joined by other parties on the left, soundly defeated Chirac's conservative allies, forcing Chirac into a new period of cohabitation with Jospin as prime minister (1997–2002), which lasted five years.

Cohabitation significantly weakened the power of Chirac's presidency. The French president, by a [[constitutional convention (political custom)|constitutional convention]], only controls foreign and military policy— and even then, allocation of funding is under the control of Parliament and under the significant influence of the prime minister. Short of dissolving parliament and calling for new elections, the president was left with little power to influence public policy regarding crime, the economy, and public services. Chirac seized the occasion to periodically criticise Jospin's government.

Nevertheless, his position was weakened by [[Corruption scandals in the Paris region|scandals about the financing of RPR by Paris municipality]]. In 2001, the left, represented by [[Bertrand Delanoë]] (PS), won over the majority in the town council of the capital. [[Jean Tiberi]], Chirac's successor at the Paris townhall, was forced to resign after having been put under investigations in June 1999 on charges of ''[[influence peddling|trafic d'influences]]'' in the [[HLM]]s of Paris affairs (related to the illegal financing of the RPR). Tiberi was finally expelled from the [[Rally for the Republic|RPR]], Chirac's party, on 12 October 2000, declaring to the ''[[Le Figaro|Figaro magazine]]'' on 18 November 2000: "Jacques Chirac is not my friend anymore".<ref>"Rien ne va plus entre Chirac et Tiberi", ''[[Le Figaro]]'', 18 November 2000 {{fr icon}}</ref> After the publication of the [[Jean-Claude Méry|Méry video-tape]] by ''[[Le Monde]]'' on 22 September 2000, in which Jean-Claude Méry, in charge of the RPR's financing, directly accused Chirac of organizing the network, and of having been physically present on 5 October 1986, when Méry gave in cash 5 millions [[Franc]]s, which came from companies who had benefited from state deals, to [[Michel Roussin]], personal secretary (''directeur de cabinet'') of Chirac,<ref>[http://www.lemonde.fr/cgi-bin/ACHATS/acheter.cgi?offre=ARCHIVES&type_item=ART_ARCH_30J&objet_id=101715 "Un témoignage pour l'histoire"], ''Le Monde'', 22 September 2000 {{fr icon}}</ref><ref>[http://www.lemonde.fr/web/recherche_breve/1,13-0,37-101887,0.html La suite du testament de Jean-Claude Méry], ''Le Monde'', 23 September 2000 {{fr icon}}</ref> Chirac refused to follow up his summons by judge [[Eric Halphen]], and the highest echelons of the French justice declared that he could not been inculpated while in functions.

During his two terms, he increased the Elysee Palace's total budget by 105 percent (currently €90 million, whereas 20 years ago it was the equivalent of €43.7 million). He doubled the number of presidential cars – nowadays there are 61 cars and seven scooters in the Palace's garage. He has hired 145 extra employees – the total number of the people he employed simultaneously was 963.

===Defence policy===
As the Supreme Commander of the French armed forces, he has reduced the French military budget, as did his predecessor. It now accounts for three percent of GDP.<ref>[https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/rankorder/2034rank.html CIA – The World Factbook – Rank Order – Military expenditures – percent of GDP]. Cia.gov. Retrieved 17 December 2011.</ref> In 1998 the [[French aircraft carrier Clemenceau (R98)]] was decommissioned after 37 years of service, and another aircraft carrier was decommissioned two years later after 37 years of service, leaving the French Navy with no aircraft carrier until 2001, when [[Charles de Gaulle (R 91)|Charles de Gaulle aircraft carrier]] was commissioned.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.netmarine.net/bat/porteavi/cdg/index.htm |title=Porte-avions Charles de Gaulle |publisher=Netmarine.net |accessdate=20 April 2010}}</ref> He has also reduced expenditures on nuclear weapons<ref>{{cite web|author=John Pike |url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/france/nuke.htm |title=Nuclear Weapons – France Nuclear Forces |publisher=[[GlobalSecurity.org]] |accessdate=20 April 2010}}</ref> and the French nuclear arsenal now includes 350 warheads, which can be compared to the Russian nuclear arsenal that consists of 16,000 warheads.<ref>{{cite web|author=John Pike |url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/wmd/world/summary.htm |title=Worldwide Nuclear Forces |publisher=Globalsecurity.org |accessdate=20 April 2010}}</ref> He has also published a plan which assumes reducing the number of fighters the French military has by 30.<ref>[http://www.defense.gouv.fr/air/contents_in_english/french_air_force/the_future/the_future ]{{Dead link|date=April 2010}}</ref>

==Second term as president (2002–2007)==
{{Main|Jacques Chirac's second term as President of France}}

At the age of 69, Chirac faced his fourth presidential campaign in 2002. He received just 20% of the vote in the first ballot of the [[French presidential elections, 2002|presidential elections]] in April 2002. It had been expected that he would face incumbent prime minister [[Lionel Jospin]] (PS) in the second round of elections; instead, Chirac faced controversial far right politician [[Jean-Marie Le Pen]] of [[National Front (France)|National Front]] (FN) who came in 200,000 votes ahead of Jospin. All parties outside the National Front (except for ''[[Lutte ouvrière]]'') called for opposing Le Pen, even if it meant voting for Chirac. The 14-day period between the two rounds of voting was marked by demonstrations against Le Pen and slogans such as "Vote for the crook, not for the fascist" or "Vote with a clothespin on your nose". Chirac won re-election by a landslide, with 82 percent of the vote on the second ballot. However, Chirac became increasingly unpopular during his second term. According to a July 2005 poll,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000085&sid=aXp5XEjdZ3_k&refer=europe |title=Europe |publisher=Bloomberg |date=2 June 2005 |accessdate=20 April 2010}}</ref> 32 percent judged Chirac favorably and 63 percent unfavorably. In 2006, ''[[The Economist]]'' wrote that Chirac "is the most unpopular occupant of the Elysée Palace in the fifth republic's history."<ref name="economistneeds">{{cite news|url=http://www.economist.com/opinion/displaystory.cfm?story_id=8080753|title=What France needs|accessdate=5 August 2007|date=26 October 2006|work=The Economist}}</ref>

===Early term===
As the left-wing Socialist Party was in thorough disarray following Jospin's defeat, Chirac reorganised politics on the [[right-wing|right]], establishing a new party – initially called the Union of the Presidential Majority, then the [[Union for a Popular Movement]] (UMP). The RPR had broken down; A number of members had formed [[Eurosceptic]] breakaways. While the Giscardian liberals of the Union of French Democracy ([[Union for French Democracy|UDF]]) had moved to the right.<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20080512001044/http://www.turkishdailynews.com.tr/archives.php?id=8465 More conservative infighting over links to French far right] [[Associated Press]] via ''Turkish Daily News''. 15 August 1998</ref> The UMP won the [[French legislative election, 2002|parliamentary elections]] that followed the presidential poll with ease.

During an official visit to [[Madagascar]] on 21 July 2005, Chirac described the repression of the 1947 [[Malagasy uprising]], which left between 80,000 and 90,000 dead, as "unacceptable".

Despite past opposition to state intervention the Chirac government approved a 2.8 billion euro aid package to troubled manufacturing giant [[Alstom]].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://web.archive.org/web/20080509043726/http://www.iht.com/articles/2003/08/08/alstom_1.php|author=Eric Pfanner |title=France's §2.8 billion aid package unlikely to bring quick fix : Alstom bailout may be long haul |work=International Herald Tribune |date=8 August 2003 |accessdate=20 April 2010}}</ref> In October 2004, Chirac signed a [[trade agreement]] with PRC President [[Hu Jintao]] where Alstom was given one billion euro in contracts and promises of future investment in China.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://english.people.com.cn/200410/10/eng20041010_159619.html |title=People's Daily Online – France's Alstom, China ink $1.3b contracts |work=People's Daily |date=10 October 2004 |accessdate=20 April 2010}}</ref>

===Assassination attempt===
On 14 July 2002, during [[Bastille Day]] celebrations, Chirac survived an assassination attempt by a lone gunman with a rifle hidden in a guitar case. The would-be assassin fired a shot toward the presidential [[motorcade]], before being overpowered by bystanders.<ref>[http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/europe/newsid_2127000/2127946.stm Chirac escapes lone gunman's bullet], ''BBC'', 15 July 2002</ref> The gunman, [[Maxime Brunerie]], underwent psychiatric testing; the violent far-right group with which he was associated, [[Unité Radicale]], was then administratively dissolved.

===Stroke===
In early September 2005, he suffered an event that his doctors described as a 'vascular incident'. It was reported as a 'minor stroke'<ref>{{cite news|last=Willsher |first=Kim |url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/1497612/Minor-stroke-puts-Chirac-in-hospital-but-he-hangs-on-to-reins-of-government.html |title=Minor stroke puts Chirac in hospital but he hangs on to reins of government |work=The Daily Telegraph |location=London |date=4 September 2005 |accessdate=20 April 2010 }}</ref> or a mini-stroke (also known as a [[transient ischemic attack]]).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-10722229.html |title=Belfast Telegraph |publisher=Highbeam.com |date=6 September 2005 |accessdate=20 April 2010}}</ref> He recovered and returned to his duties soon after.

===2005 referendum on the TCE===
{{Further|Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe}}

On 29 May 2005, a [[referendum]] was held in France to decide whether the country should ratify the proposed treaty for a [[Constitution of the European Union]] (TCE). The result was a victory for the No campaign, with 55 percent of voters rejecting the treaty on a turnout of 69 percent, dealing a devastating blow to Chirac and the [[Union for a Popular Movement|UMP]] party, as well as to part of the center-left which had supported the TCE.


===Foreign policy===
Along with [[Vladimir Putin]] (Chirac called Vladimir Putin "a personal friend".<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.economist.com/node/15578042 |title=Europe's bear problem |date=25 February 2010 |work=The Economist }}</ref>), [[Hu Jintao]], and [[Gerhard Schröder]], Chirac emerged as a leading voice against [[George W. Bush]] in 2003 during the organization and deployment of the United States led [[Coalition of the willing|military coalition]] to [[Deposition (politics)|forcibly remove]] the then current government of [[Iraq]] controlled by the [[Ba'ath Party]] under the leadership of [[Saddam Hussein]] and resulted in the 2003–2011 [[Iraq War]]. Despite intense US pressure, Chirac threatened to veto, at that given point, a resolution in the [[UN Security Council]] that would authorise the use of military force to rid [[Iraq and weapons of mass destruction|Iraq of alleged weapons of mass destruction]], and rallied other governments to his position. "Iraq today does not represent an immediate threat that justifies an immediate war", Chirac said on 18 March 2003. Chirac was then the target of various American and British commentators supporting the decisions of Bush and [[Tony Blair]]. Future Prime Minister [[Dominique de Villepin]] acquired much of his popularity for his speech against the war at the United Nations (UN).
After [[Togo]]'s leader [[Gnassingbé Eyadéma]]'s death on 5 February 2005, Chirac gave him tribute and supported his son, [[Faure Gnassingbé]], who has since succeeded to his father.<ref name="Smith" />

On 19 January 2006, Chirac said that France was prepared to launch a [[nuclear warfare|nuclear strike]] against any country that sponsors a [[List of terrorist incidents|terrorist attack]] against French interests. He said his country's [[Force de frappe|nuclear arsenal]] had been reconfigured to include the ability to make a tactical strike in retaliation for terrorism.<ref>[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/19/AR2006011903311.html Chirac: Nuclear Response to Terrorism Is Possible], ''[[The Washington Post]]'', 20 January 2006</ref>

In July 2006, the [[G8]] met to discuss international energy concerns. Despite the rising awareness of [[global warming]] issues, the G8 focuses on "[[energy security]]" issues. Chirac continues to be the voice within the G8 summit meetings to support international action to curb global warming and [[climate change]] concerns. Chirac warns that "humanity is dancing on a [[volcano]]" and calls for serious action by the world's leading industrialised nations.<ref>[http://www.cutco2.org/2006/07/chirac-is-not-in-favor-of-dancing-on.html Chirac is Not in Favor of Dancing on Volcanoes], on "CutC02"'s website, 17 July 2006</ref>

===2005 civil unrest and CPE protests===
{{Further|2005 civil unrest in France |2006 labour protests in France}}

Following major [[2006 labour protests in France|student protests in spring 2006]], which followed [[2005 civil unrest in France|civil unrest]] in autumn 2005 after the death of two young boys in [[Clichy-sous-Bois]], one of the poorest French commune located in Paris' suburbs, Chirac retracted the proposed [[First Employment Contract]] (CPE) by "promulgating [it] without applying it", an unheard-of – and, some claim, illegal – move destined to appease the protests while giving the appearance not to retract himself, and therefore to continue his support towards his Prime Minister [[Dominique de Villepin]].

===Flight tax===

Chirac requested the ''[http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/en/IMG/pdf/LandauENG1.pdf Landau-report]'' (published in September 2004) and combined with the ''[http://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/en/IMG/pdf/rapportdugroupequadripartite.pdf Report of the Technical Group on Innovative Financing Mechanisms]'' formulated upon request by the Heads of State of Brazil, Chile, France and Spain (issued in December 2004), these documents present various opportunities for innovative financing mechanisms while equally stressing the advantages (stability and predictability) of tax-based models. [[UNITAID]] project was born. Today the organisation executive board is chaired by [[Philippe Douste-Blazy]].

===The Clearstream affair===
{{Further|Clearstream}}

During April and May 2006, Chirac's administration was beset by a crisis as his chosen Prime Minister, Dominique de Villepin, was accused of asking [[Philippe Rondot]], a top level French [[espionage|spy]], for a secret investigation into Villepin's chief political rival, [[Nicolas Sarkozy]], in 2004. This matter has been called the second [[Clearstream Affair]]. On 10 May 2006, following a Cabinet meeting, Chirac made a rare television appearance to try to protect Villepin from the scandal and to debunk allegations that Chirac himself had set up a Japanese bank account containing 300 million francs in 1992 as Mayor of Paris.<ref>[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,542-2174662,00.html French farce], ''[[The Times]]'', 11 May 2006</ref> Chirac said that "The Republic is not a dictatorship of rumors, a dictatorship of calumny."<ref>[http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,3-2174839,00.html Caught in deep water: Chirac swims against a tide of scandal], ''The Times'', 11 May 2006</ref>

===Announcement of intention not to seek a third term===
In a pre-recorded television broadcast aired on 11 March 2007, Jacques Chirac announced, in a widely predicted move, that he would not choose to seek a third term as France's President. "My whole life has been committed to serving France, and serving peace", Chirac said, adding that he would find new ways to serve France after leaving office. He did not explain the reasons for his decision.<ref>[http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/03/12/europe/EU-POL-France-Chiracs-Future.php France's Chirac says he will not run for re-election] Associated Press, 11 March 2007. Retrieved 11 March 2007</ref> Chirac did not, during the broadcast, endorse any of the candidates running for election, but did devote several minutes of his talk to a plea against extremist politics that was considered a thinly disguised invocation to voters not to vote for [[Jean-Marie Le Pen]] and a recommendation to [[Nicolas Sarkozy]] not to orient his campaign so as to include themes traditionally associated with Le Pen.<ref>[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/03/11/AR2007031101091.html Chirac Leaving Stage Admired and Scorned] by John Leicester, Associated Press, 11 March 2007. Retrieved 11 March 2007.</ref>

==Opinion on hijab==

French President Jacques Chirac declared his complete rejection of the wearing of the Islamic headscarf, or [[hijab]], by female Muslims in French schools and public corporations. He adds that he perceives a kind of hostility in the wearing of the hijab. Chirac stated that with banning the hijab, there will be more integration in French society. He has contributed in establishing a law that prohibits wearing the hijab and other religious symbols and manifestations in schools and public corporations. {{dubious|This has created small controversy in France as some Muslims believe they are being discriminated against.|date=May 2012}}{{Verify credibility|date=May 2012}}<ref>http://www.arabwestreport.info/?q=node/12158 (Arab West Report: Art. 28, Week 50/2003, 10–15 December)</ref>

==Life after presidency==
Shortly after leaving office, he launched the [[Fondation Chirac]]<ref>{{cite news |url=http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jyHbiQwT8A2VnasPh30A3G8kbt3w |title=Chirac launches foundation 'to awaken consciences' |agency=AFP |date=8 June 2008}}</ref> in June 2008. Since then it has been striving for peace through five advocacy programmes:
conflict prevention, access to water and sanitation, access to quality medicines and healthcare, access to land resources, and preservation of cultural diversity. It supports field projects that involve local people and provide concrete and innovative solutions. Chirac chairs the jury for the [[Fondation Chirac Prize for Conflict Prevention|Prize for Conflict Prevention]] awarded every year by his foundation.<ref>[http://www.fondationchirac.eu/en/the-fondation-chirac-prize-for-conflict-prevention/ The Fondation Chirac Prize for Conflict Prevention]</ref>

He also became a lifetime member of the [[Constitutional Council of France]]. He sat for the first time in the Council on 15 November 2007, six months after leaving the French Presidency. Immediately after Sarkozy's victory, Chirac moved into a 180 square meters duplex on the Quai Voltaire in Paris lent to him by the family of former [[Lebanon|Lebanese]] Prime Minister [[Rafik Hariri]]. During the [[Didier Schuller]] affair, the latter accused Hariri of having participated to the illegal funding of the [[Rally for the Republic|RPR]]'s political campaigns, but the justice closed the case without further investigations.<ref>[http://www.liberation.fr/actualite/politiques/250314.FR.php Chirac trouve un point de chute à Paris chez la famille Hariri], ''[[Libération]]'', 27 April 2007 {{fr icon}}</ref>

On 11 April 2008, Chirac's office announced that he had undergone successful surgery to fit a [[pacemaker]]. In January 2009, it was reported that Chirac had been hospitalised after being attacked by his pet [[Maltese (dog)|Maltese]] poodle. According to Chirac's wife Bernadette, the dog, named Sumo, had a history of unpredictable and vicious behavior, and had previously been medicated with antidepressants in an attempt to control it.<ref>{{cite news |title=President Chirac hospitalised after mauling by his clinically depressed poodle |publisher=[[Daily Mail]]'' (London) |date=21 January 2009 |url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1126136/Former-French-President-Chirac-hospitalised-mauling-clinically-depressed-poodle.html?ITO=1490 |first=Ian |last=Sparks}}</ref>

===Embezzlement trial===
On 7 March 2011, he went on trial for charges of corruption (the first former French head of state to stand trial since [[Philippe Pétain]], who surrendered and collaborated with Nazi Germany) involving the misuse of public money during his time as [[mayor of Paris]] (1977–1995).<ref name="bbc trial opens">{{cite news | url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-12661446 | title=France: Jacques Chirac corruption trial opens | accessdate=8 March 2011 | date=7 March 2011 |publisher=BBC News | archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/5x1Fr7GjO | archivedate=8 March 2011}}</ref> He was accused of paying cronies and political allies for 28 jobs that did not exist.<ref name="bbc trial opens" /><ref name="tele">{{cite news | url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8366721/Jacques-Chirac-trial-faces-further-delays.html | title=Jacques Chirac trial faces further delays | accessdate=8 March 2011 | date=7 March 2011 | publisher=The Telegraph | archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/5x1FyQ5W1 | archivedate=8 March 2011 | first=Henry | last=Samuel}}</ref> Along with Chirac, nine others stood trial in two separate cases, one dealing with fictional jobs for 21 people and the other with jobs for the remaining seven.<ref name="bbc trial opens" /> France's current Minister of Foreign Affairs, [[Alain Juppé]], was sentenced to a 14-month suspended prison sentence for the same case in 2004.<ref name="BBC guilty 15 December">{{cite news|title=French ex-President Jacques Chirac guilty of corruption|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-16194089|publisher=BBC |accessdate=15 December 2011|date=15 December 2011}}</ref>

On 15 December 2011, Chirac was found guilty and given a suspended sentence of two years.<ref name="BBC guilty 15 December" /> He was convicted of embezzling public funds, abuse of trust and illegal conflict of interest. The suspended sentence means he does not have to go to prison, and took into account his age, health, and status as a former head of state when determining the sentence.<ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/dec/15/jacques-chirac-guilty-corruption "Jacques Chirac found guilty of corruption"], ''Guardian'', 15 December 2011.</ref> He did not attend his trial, since medical doctors deemed that his neurological problems damaged his memory.<ref name="BBC guilty 15 December" /> His defense team decided not to appeal.<ref name="BBC guilty 15 December" /><ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/16/world/europe/chirac-found-guilty-in-political-funding-case.html|title=Chirac Found Guilty in Political Funding Case|date=15 December 2011|work=The New York Times|accessdate=15 December 2011|first=Steven|last=Erlanger}}</ref>

As a former President, he is entitled to a lifetime pension and personal security protection, and is ex-officio a member for life of France's constitutional council.<ref name="CNN Chirac found guilty">[http://articles.cnn.com/2011-12-15/world/world_europe_france-chirac_1_chirac-francois-hollande-corruption-charges?_s=PM:EUROPE "Chirac found guilty on corruption charges"], CNN.com, 15 December 2011.</ref>

===Memoirs and popularity===
In Volume 2 of his memoirs published in June 2011, Chirac mocked his successor [[Nicolas Sarkozy]] as "irritable, rash, impetuous, disloyal, ungrateful, and un-French".<ref name=FE>[http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-13710626 "France election 2012: Chirac mocks Sarkozy in memoirs"], BBC. 9 June 2011. Retrieved 9 June 2011</ref><ref>[http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/impetuous-disloyal-and-unfrench-chirac-attempts-coup-de-grace-on-sarkozy-2294940.html "'Impetuous, disloyal, and un-French': Chirac attempts coup de grace on Sarkozy"], John Lichfield. 9 June 2011. Retrieved 9 June 2011</ref> Chirac wrote he considered firing Sarkozy before, and conceded responsibility in allowing [[Jean Marie Le Pen]] to advance in 2002.<ref>[http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8564184/Jacques-Chirac-breaks-four-year-silence-on-Nicolas-Sarkozy-to-criticise-French-president.html "Jacques Chirac breaks four-year silence on Nicolas Sarkozy to criticise French president"], Henry Samuel. The Telegraph. 9 June 2011. Retrieved 9 June 2011</ref>

A poll conducted in 2010 suggested he was the most admired political figure in France, while Sarkozy was 32nd.<ref name=FE />

==In culture==

===Impact on French popular culture===
Because of Jacques Chirac's long career in visible government positions, he has often been parodied or caricatured: Young Jacques Chirac is the basis of a young, dashing bureaucrat character in the 1976 [[Asterix]] comic strip album ''[[Obelix and Co.]]'', proposing methods to quell Gallic unrest to elderly, old-style Roman politicians. Chirac was also featured in ''[[Le Bêbête Show]]'' as an overexcited, jumpy character.

Jacques Chirac is a favorite character of ''[[Les Guignols de l'Info]]'', a satiric latex [[puppet show]]. He was once portrayed as a rather likable, though overexcited, character ; however, following the corruption allegations, he has been shown as a kind of dilettante and incompetent who pilfers public money and lies through his teeth. His character for a while developed a [[superhero]] alter ego, ''Super Menteur'' ("Super Liar") in order to get him out of embarrassing situations. Because of his alleged improprieties, he was lambasted in a song ''Chirac en prison'' ("Chirac in jail") by French punk band [[Les Wampas]], with a video clip made by the ''Guignols''.

===Portrayals in film===
His role is played by [[Charles Fathy]] in the [[Oliver Stone]] film ''[[W. (film)|W.]]'' and in ''La conquête'' by Bernard Le Coq.

Marc Rioufol plays Chirac in [[Richard Loncraine]]'s 2010 film ''[[The Special Relationship (film)|The Special Relationship]]''.

==Political career==
President of the French Republic: 1995–2007. Reelected in 2002.

Member of the [[Constitutional Council of France]]: Since 2007.

'''Governmental functions'''

Prime minister: 1974–1976 (Resignation) / 1986–1988.

Minister of Interior: March–May 1974.

Minister of Agriculture and Rural Development: 1972–1974.

Minister of Relation with Parliament: 1971–1972.

Secretary of State for Economy and Finance: 1968–1971.

Secretary of State for Social Affairs: 1967–1968.

'''Electoral mandates'''

'''''European Parliament'''''

Member of [[European Parliament]]: 1979–1980 (Resignation). Elected in 1979.

'''''National Assembly of France'''''

Member of the [[National Assembly of France]] for [[Corrèze]]: March–April 1967 (Became Secretary of State in April 1967) Reelected in 1968, 1973, but he stays minister / 1976–1986 (Became Prime minister in 1986) / 1988–1995 (Resignation, became President of the French Republic in 1995). Elected in 1967, reelected in 1968, 1973, 1976, 1981, 1986, 1988, 1993.

'''''General Council'''''

President of the General Council of Corrèze: 1970–1979. Reelected in 1973, 1976.

General councillor of Corrèze: 1968–1988. Reelected in 1970, 1976, 1982.

'''''Municipal Council'''''

Mayor of Paris: 1977–1995 (Resignation, became President of the French Republic in 1995). Reelected in 1983, 1989.

Councillor of Paris: 1977–1995 (Resignation). Reelected in 1983, 1989.

Municipal councillor of [[Sainte-Féréole]]: 1965–1977. Reelected in 1971.

'''Political function'''

President of the [[Rally for the Republic]]: 1976–1994 (Resignation).

==Honours==
*Grand Cross of the [[Legion of Honour]]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.elysee.fr/elysee/elysee.fr/anglais_archives/jacques_chirac/biography/biography.39706.html |title=Biography – Website of the Office of the French President |publisher=Elysee.fr |accessdate=20 April 2010}}</ref>
*Grand Cross of the [[National Order of Merit (France)|French National Order of Merit]]
*[[Croix de la Valeur Militaire]]
*[[Médaille de l'Aéronautique]]
*Knight of the [[Mérite agricole]]
*Knight of the [[Order of Arts and Letters]]
*Knight of the [[Order of the Black Star]] ([[Bénin]]) (French Colonial Order)
*Knight of the [[Mérite Sportif]]
*Grand Cross of the [[Order pro merito Melitensi]]
*Honorary Officer of the [[National Order of Quebec]]
*[[Cóndor de oro]]
* Grand Cross of the [[Order of Good Hope]] (1996)<ref name="Nat1996">[http://www.info.gov.za/aboutgovt/orders/recipients/1996.htm 1996 National Orders awards]</ref>
*Grand Cross of the [[Order of St. Olav]] (2000)<ref>[http://web.archive.org/web/20080706054452/http://www.saintolav.com/grandcrossawards/headsofstateroyals.html Den Kongelige Norske St. Olavs Orden – www.StOlav.com]</ref>
*Member 1st class of the [[Order of Merit for the Fatherland]] (Russia, 23 September 1997) – for his great personal contribution to the development of cooperation and friendship between the peoples of Russia and France
*[[Medal "In Commemoration of the 300th Anniversary of Saint Petersburg"]]
*[[State Prize of the Russian Federation]] (2007) – for outstanding achievements in the humanitarian field<ref name=Kommersant>[http://www.kommersant.ru/doc.aspx?DocsID=894018&NodesID=7 Названы лауреаты Государственной премии РФ] [[Kommersant]] 20 May 2008 {{ru icon}}</ref>
*Knight Grand Cross with Collar of the [[Order of Merit of the Italian Republic]]<ref>[http://www.quirinale.it/elementi/Onorificenze.aspx?pag=0&qIdOnorificenza=&cognome=chirac&nome=&daAnno=1800&aAnno=2010&luogoNascita=&testo=&ordinamento=OCO_ANNO_DECRETO%20DESC,OCO_MESE_DECRETO%20DESC,OCO_GIORNO_DECRETO%20DESC Jacques Chirac]. Italian presidency website. Quirinale.it (21 October 1999). Retrieved 17 December 2011.</ref>
*Knight of the [[Order of the White Eagle]] (Poland, 1996)
*Grand Collar of the [[Order of Prince Henry]] (Portugal, 1999)
*Grand Star of the [[Decoration for Services to the Republic of Austria]]
*Collar of the [[Order of the White Lion]] (Czech Republic, 1997)
*Grand Cross with Collar of the [[Order of the Star of Romania]] (1998)
*Grand Cross of the [[Order of Vytautas the Great]] (Lithuania, 1997)<ref name="Lith">[http://www.lrp.lt/lt/prezidento_veikla/apdovanojimai/apdovanojimai_256/p40.html Lithuanian Presidency], Lithuanian Orders searching form</ref>
*Honorary Knight Commander of the [[Order of the Bath]] (UK)
*[[Heydar Aliyev Order]] (Azerbaijan)
*Grand Cross of the [[Order of the Lithuanian Grand Duke Gediminas]] (Lithuania, 24 July 2001)<ref name="Lith" />
*Commander Grand Cross of the [[Order of the Three Stars]] (Latvia)
*[[Ig Nobel prize]] for peace, for commemorating the fiftieth anniversary of Hiroshima with atomic bomb tests in the Pacific (1996)

==Titles from birth to currently==
*Monsieur le ''Président de la République française'' (1995–2007)
*''His Excellency The Sovereign Co-Prince of Andorra'' (1995–2007)

==See also==
{{Portal|France|Biography|Politics}}
*[[Anh Dao Traxel]]
*[[List of national leaders]]
*[[Politics of France]]
*[[French presidential election, 1981]]
*[[French presidential election, 1988]]
*[[French presidential election, 1995]]
*[[French presidential election, 2002]]
*[[French presidential election, 2007]]
* [[Musée du Président Jacques Chirac]]

==References==
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}}

==Bibliography==
*Emmanuel Hecht, Thierry Vey, ''Chirac de A à Z, dictionnaire critique et impertinent'', [[Éditions Albin Michel]], ISBN 2-226-07664-6
*Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, ''Le pouvoir et la vie, tome 3''
*[[Frederic Lepage]], ''A Table avec Chirac''
*Jacques Chirac, ''[[The development of the port of New-Orleans|La Nouvelle-Orléans et son port en 1954]]'', [Presses Universitaires du Nouveau Monde], ISBN 1-931948-68-2

==External links==
{{Wikinews category}}
{{Wikiquote}}
{{commons|Jacques Chirac}}
*[http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/searchSimpleResults/iw/1/keyword/Jacques%20Chirac%20not%20sarkozy Public opinion polls on Jacques Chirac]
*[http://www.elysee.fr/president/la-presidence/les-presidents-depuis-1848/histoire-des-presidents-de-la-republique/jacques-chirac-1932.5308.html Biography at the Official Website of the Office of the French President]
*{{fr icon}} [http://news.tf1.fr/news/france/0,,3232946,00.html TF1]
*{{fr icon}} [http://www.lexpress.fr/info/france/dossier/chirac/dossier.asp?ida=434072 l'Express]
*{{fr icon}} [http://www.paris.fr/portail/accueil/Portal.lut?page_id=96&document_type_id=5&document_id=7999&portlet_id=10575 Mairie de Paris]
*{{fr icon}} [http://www.ldainfos.com/politique/presidentielle_2002/chirac.htm Biography and his election (2002)]
*{{fr icon}} [http://www.lescitations.net/citations/auteurs/Jacques_Chirac.html Some Jacques Chirac's quotations]
*[http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/index.php?menuID=2&subID=1509&p=2 Jacques Chirac – A life in pictures photo essay]
*[[Anne Applebaum]], [http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/07/AR2007050701239.html Farewell, Jacques Chirac], ''The Washington Post'', 8 May 2007
*[http://news.pdousteblazy.com Latest news of UNITAID (initiated by Jacques Chirac) and today chaired Philippe Douste-Blazy]
*[http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/jacques-chirac Articles at ''The Guardian'']

{{s-start}}
{{s-off}}
{{s-bef|before=[[Michel Cointat]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=[[Ministry of Agriculture (France)|Minister of Agriculture]]|years=1972–1974}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Raymond Marcellin]]}}
|-
{{s-bef|before=[[Raymond Marcellin]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=[[Minister of the Interior (France)|Minister of the Interior]]|years=1974}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Michel Poniatowski]]}}
|-
{{s-bef|before=[[Pierre Messmer]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=[[Prime Minister of France]]|years=1974–1976}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Raymond Barre]]}}
|-
{{s-new|office}}
{{s-ttl|title=[[List of mayors of Paris|Mayor of Paris]]|years=1977–1995}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Jean Tiberi]]}}
|-
{{s-bef|before=[[Laurent Fabius]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=[[Prime Minister of France]]|years=1986–1988}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Michel Rocard]]}}
|-
{{s-bef|before=[[François Mitterrand]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=[[President of France]]|years=1995–2007}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Nicolas Sarkozy]]}}
|-
{{s-ppo}}
{{s-bef|before=[[Alexandre Sanguinetti]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=Leader of the [[Union of Democrats for the Republic]]|years=1974–1975}}
{{s-aft|after=[[André Bord]]}}
|-
{{s-new|party}}
{{s-ttl|title=Leader of [[Rally for the Republic]]|years=1976–1994}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Alain Juppé]]}}
|-
{{s-bef|before=[[Jacques Chaban-Delmas]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=[[Rally for the Republic]] nominee for [[President of France]]|years=[[French presidential election, 1981|1981]], [[French presidential election, 1988|1988]], [[French presidential election, 1995|1995]], [[French presidential election, 2002|2002]]}}
{{s-non|reason=Party merged}}
|-
{{s-reg}}
{{s-bef|before=[[François Mitterrand]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=[[Co-Princes of Andorra|Co-Prince of Andorra]]|alongside=[[Joan Martí Alanis]], [[Joan Enric Vives Sicília]]|years=1995–2007}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Nicolas Sarkozy]]}}
|-
{{s-rel|ca}}
{{s-bef|before=[[François Mitterrand]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=[[Canon (priest)#Honorary canons|Honorary Canon]] of the [[Basilica of St. John Lateran]]|years=1995–2007}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Nicolas Sarkozy]]}}
|-
{{s-dip}}
{{s-bef|rows=2|before=[[Jean Chrétien]]}}
{{s-ttl|title=Chairperson of the [[G8|Group of 7]]|years=1996}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Bill Clinton]]}}
|-
{{s-ttl|title=Chairperson of the [[G8|Group of 8]]|years=2003}}
{{s-aft|after=[[George W. Bush]]}}
|-
{{s-prec}}
{{s-bef|before=[[Valéry Giscard d'Estaing]]|as=Former President}}
{{s-ttl|title=[[French order of precedence|Order of Precedence of France]] ''Former President''|years=}}
{{s-aft|after=[[Nicolas Sarkozy]]|as=Former President}}
{{s-end}}

{{Heads of state of France}}
{{Heads of government of France}}
{{Candidates in the French presidential election, 1988}}
{{Presidents of the European Council}}
{{UDRLeaders}}
{{Member Constitutional Council of France}}
{{Authority control|VIAF=31994554|LCCN=n/50/038160|GND=118520466|SELIBR=293573}}

{{Persondata
|NAME= Chirac, Jacques
|ALTERNATIVE NAMES=Chirac, Jacques René
|SHORT DESCRIPTION=[[President of the French Republic|President of France]]
|DATE OF BIRTH=29 November 1932
|PLACE OF BIRTH=Paris, France
|DATE OF DEATH=
|PLACE OF DEATH=
}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Chirac, Jacques}}
[[Category:1932 births]]
[[Category:Alumni of Sciences Po]]
[[Category:École nationale d'administration alumni]]
[[Category:Attempted assassination survivors]]
[[Category:French anti-communists]]
[[Category:French Army officers]]
[[Category:French fraudsters]]
[[Category:French interior ministers]]
[[Category:French military personnel of the Algerian War]]
[[Category:French politicians convicted of crimes]]
[[Category:French Roman Catholics]]
[[Category:Government of Andorra]]
[[Category:Chevaliers of the Ordre des Arts et des Lettres]]
[[Category:Collars of the Order of the White Lion]]
[[Category:Grand Collars of the Order of Prince Henry]]
[[Category:Grand Croix of the Légion d'honneur]]
[[Category:Grand Croix of the Ordre national du Mérite]]
[[Category:Grand Crosses of the Order of Good Hope]]
[[Category:Grand Crosses of the Order of the Lithuanian Grand Duke Gediminas]]
[[Category:Grand Crosses of the Order of Vytautas the Great]]
[[Category:Honorary Knights Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath]]
[[Category:Knights Grand Cross with Collar of the Order of Merit of the Italian Republic]]
[[Category:Knights Grand Cross of the Order of St. Olav]]
[[Category:Knights of the Order of the Black Star]]
[[Category:Officers of the National Order of Quebec]]
[[Category:Knights of the Ordre National du Mérite Agricole (France)]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Collar of the Order of the Cross of Terra Mariana]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Croix de la Valeur Militaire]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Heydar Aliyev Order]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Grand Star of the Decoration for Services to the Republic of Austria]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Médaille de l'Aéronautique]]
[[Category:Recipients of the National Order of Merit (Malta)]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Order of Merit for the Fatherland, 1st class]]
[[Category:Recipients of the Order of the Three Stars, 1st Class]]
[[Category:Sashes of the Order of the Star of Romania]]
[[Category:State Prize of the Russian Federation laureates]]
[[Category:Grand Crosses of the Order pro merito Melitensi]]
[[Category:Ig Nobel Prize winners]]
[[Category:Jacques Chirac|Jacques Chirac]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Harvard University alumni]]
[[Category:Lycée Carnot alumni]]
[[Category:Lycée Louis-le-Grand alumni]]
[[Category:Mayors of Paris]]
[[Category:Politicians from Paris]]
[[Category:Politicians of the French Fifth Republic]]
[[Category:Presidents of France]]
[[Category:Prime Ministers of France]]
[[Category:Roman Catholic monarchs]]
[[Category:Stroke survivors]]
[[Category:French Ministers of Agriculture]]

[[af:Jacques Chirac]]
[[am:ዣክ ሺራክ]]
[[ar:جاك شيراك]]
[[an:Jacques Chirac]]
[[frp:Jacques Chirac]]
[[ast:Jacques Chirac]]
[[az:Jak Şirak]]
[[bn:জাক শিরাক]]
[[zh-min-nan:Jacques Chirac]]
[[be:Жак Шырак]]
[[be-x-old:Жак Шырак]]
[[bg:Жак Ширак]]
[[bs:Jacques Chirac]]
[[br:Jacques Chirac]]
[[ca:Jacques Chirac]]
[[cv:Жак Ширак]]
[[cs:Jacques Chirac]]
[[co:Jacques Chirac]]
[[cy:Jacques Chirac]]
[[da:Jacques Chirac]]
[[de:Jacques Chirac]]
[[et:Jacques Chirac]]
[[el:Ζακ Σιράκ]]
[[es:Jacques Chirac]]
[[eo:Jacques Chirac]]
[[eu:Jacques Chirac]]
[[fa:ژاک شیراک]]
[[fr:Jacques Chirac]]
[[fy:Jacques Chirac]]
[[ga:Jacques Chirac]]
[[gv:Jacques Chirac]]
[[gl:Jacques Chirac]]
[[ko:자크 시라크]]
[[hy:Ժակ Շիրակ]]
[[hi:ज़्याक शिराक]]
[[hsb:Jacques Chirac]]
[[hr:Jacques Chirac]]
[[io:Jacques Chirac]]
[[id:Jacques Chirac]]
[[ia:Jacques Chirac]]
[[is:Jacques Chirac]]
[[it:Jacques Chirac]]
[[he:ז'אק שיראק]]
[[jv:Jacques Chirac]]
[[ka:ჟაკ შირაკი]]
[[ku:Jacques Chirac]]
[[la:Iacobus Chirac]]
[[lv:Žaks Širaks]]
[[lt:Jacques Chirac]]
[[li:Jacques Chirac]]
[[hu:Jacques Chirac]]
[[mk:Жак Ширак]]
[[mr:जाक शिराक]]
[[xmf:ჟაკ შირაკი]]
[[arz:جاك شيراك]]
[[ms:Jacques Chirac]]
[[nl:Jacques Chirac]]
[[ja:ジャック・シラク]]
[[no:Jacques Chirac]]
[[nn:Jacques Chirac]]
[[nrm:Jacques Chirac]]
[[oc:Jacques Chirac]]
[[nds:Jacques Chirac]]
[[pl:Jacques Chirac]]
[[pt:Jacques Chirac]]
[[ty:Jacques Chirac]]
[[ro:Jacques Chirac]]
[[rm:Jacques Chirac]]
[[ru:Ширак, Жак]]
[[sa:ज्याक शिराक]]
[[sco:Jacques Chirac]]
[[sq:Jacques Chirac]]
[[scn:Jacques Chirac]]
[[simple:Jacques Chirac]]
[[sk:Jacques Chirac]]
[[sl:Jacques Chirac]]
[[sr:Жак Ширак]]
[[sh:Jacques Chirac]]
[[fi:Jacques Chirac]]
[[sv:Jacques Chirac]]
[[tl:Jacques Chirac]]
[[ta:ஜாக் சிராக்]]
[[tt:Жак Ширак]]
[[th:ฌัก ชีรัก]]
[[tg:Жак Ширак]]
[[tr:Jacques Chirac]]
[[uk:Жак Ширак]]
[[vi:Jacques Chirac]]
[[fiu-vro:Chiraci Jacques]]
[[war:Jacques Chirac]]
[[yi:זשאק שיראק]]
[[yo:Jacques Chirac]]
[[zh-yue:希拉克]]
[[bat-smg:Žāks Širāks]]
[[zh:雅克·希拉克]]

Wikipedia:SOPA initiative/Action

2012-01-16T17:06:42Z

*SM*: /* Oppose */ +1

<noinclude>{{Wikipedia:SOPA initiative/Nav}}</noinclude>
== Call for comment from the community ==
{{notice|This discussion is being opened by the Wikimedia Foundation to determine how it can support the English Wikipedia community on its decision (if any) relating to the protest of the [[Stop Online Piracy Act]]. The purpose of this discussion is to gauge whether consensus is emerging for action, and if so to clarify what action the community wishes to take. The WMF is posting this call for comment to ensure that we have the necessary time to develop technology to support any action the community may decide to take.''

We understand that January 18, 2012 may be an effective date to act because of other internet activism which will occur on that date. Should the community choose to act on January 18, in order to appropriately develop the necessary technology, the WMF will need to know the community’s plans by January 16, 2012 at 23:59 UTC.

This page is a restatement of what the Foundation thinks the community’s position is, based on previous conversations at [[User talk:Jimbo_Wales]] ([[User_talk:Jimbo_Wales/Archive_91|straw poll]]) and [[WP:SOPA]]. Please also see [[m:IRC_office_hours/Office_hours_2012-01-12|the IRC office hours chat logs]]. For background on the bill itself, please see [[WP:SOPA]]. The Foundation will support whatever the community chooses to do (to the best of our ability, given the resources and time available), including if the community chooses to take no action. The German Wikipedia has formed consensus for action on the German Wikipedia: that discussion can be found [[:de:Wikipedia:Initiative_gegen_den_SOPA|here]].

As a purely process note, ideally, this page would not become a location to rehash the good and bad points of the bill itself - my hope is that this page can be used to discuss the proposed action, not the bill. Please sign, and/or comment, in the “Support” or “Oppose” sections for each of the open questions. [[User:Philippe (WMF)|Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation]] ([[User talk:Philippe (WMF)|talk]]) 17:23, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

== Comment on blackouts and technical feasibilities ==
Hi everyone,
Since it appears nearly certain that there will be a blackout of one form or another (interstitial or full), I think it's important to remind everyone that in the limited time allotted, it is very likely that we will not be able to make 100% sure that nobody can access Wikipedia. In fact - we may not even want that (there should be an emergency access, for example, in case something goes wrong and a bot runs out of control or something). So I want to be sure that everyone understands that the Foundation will follow the community's will here to the very best of our ability, but also to remind everyone that our coders are putting this together on very little notice (and are giving up a holiday to come in to work on it). We'll probably miss some things and may be required to accomodate exceptional access. That's okay. If we block it out for 90%, it's a massively powerful statement. Just wanted to be sure that expectations are appropriately set here. [[User:Philippe (WMF)|Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation]] ([[User talk:Philippe (WMF)|talk]]) 06:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)}}

===Summary===
There appears to be an emerging consensus that the community wants to do “something” to demonstrate concern about this bill. Questions remain whether that should impact just the United States or the whole world, and what the “something” is. Based on what the WMF believes is emerging as consensus from community discussions, we are asking your input on the following open questions.

'''Update:''' A first round of designs for interstitial "blackout" screens has been posted to [[Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Blackout_screen_designs|Blackout screen designs]].

=== Open questions ===

'''Instructions:''' To show your support for any of the proposed actions below, add the following line of code at the bottom of the list of other supporters you wish to join:

<big><code><nowiki>#'''Support'''. ~~~~</nowiki></code></big>

==== US only vs global (all users) ====
Consensus appears to be emerging that this proposed action should target only users of the English Wikipedia. The blackout component would apply only to users geo-located to the United States. It's important to say that this blackout will be accomplished using a "splash screen". It will not remove or block any content. The banner component would display to all users, regardless of location.

To avoid clutter, please '''Support''' only your favorite option (do not ''Oppose''), and if you wish state your feelings about other options in your response, referring to them by number.

===== (1) Blackout US only, global banner =====
#'''Strongly Support''' —Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/184.78.162.153|184.78.162.153]] ([[User talk:184.78.162.153|talk]]) 02:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

#'''Support''' It is imperative that the other, similar bills, are also given light. Just because SOPA can get shot down does not mean that the others will, too. The banner is better for non-US because they really can't do much to change USA's lawmaking. [[User talk:Ainola|Ainola]] 14:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Strongly Support''' - the 'soft black out' is a bad idea but it defeats the entire purpose of blacking out. OFF-LINE, and maybe a link to anonymizing proxies and/or Tor network to promote semi-anonymous traffic. [[User:Redsully|Reid Sullivan]] ([[User talk:Redsully|talk]]) 03:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' (1) [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] [[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]] 18:14, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Jorgejch|Jorge Haddad]]
# '''Support''', but (2) is acceptable as well. – [[User:Andrew Hampe|Andrew Hampe]] [[User talk:Andrew Hampe|Talk]] 18:16, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# Despite what some have said, I don't think it would make all that much of a difference to U.S. lawmakers if the site was blanked globally. Readers from other locations should be able to see the site. However, from what I've seen, most would be glad to join the protest so I don't think it's that big of a deal. '''[[User talk:Night w|Nightw]]''' 18:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#: <s>'''Support'''</s> - if there has to be a blackout, then it should only take place in the US, since there's no benefit to blacking out those in any countries (they can't do anything to solve the problem, since it's a US law that only US citizens can appeal against, so why punish them by taking away their Wikipedia access?). [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 18:43, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#: The header when I left this message was 'US only' rather than the current "Blackout US only, banner for all users". I was trying to make the point that '''if''' a blackout happens it should only cover the US, nothing more. I'm generally opposed to a blackout at all. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 20:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#:: Sorry for confusion - maybe consider supporting one of (4)-(6) and then indicate that you prefer (1) or (3) to (2)? [[User:Dcoetzee|Dcoetzee]] 20:26, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - (for worldwide blackout) Passing of SOPA in USA will have repercussions for the rest of the world. SOPA is not just an American issue anymore. Everyone has to be informed and involved. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Britsin|Britsin]] ([[User talk:Britsin|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Britsin|contribs]]) 22:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - I agree with Mike Peel. However, expatriats and citizens of other countries should be informed to take part in the conversation and the opposition to SOPA from abroad, for example by calling the local US embassy and mention the concern. Since many SOPA supporters are international companies, there are local offices of these companies abroad, too. -- [[User:Mathias Schindler|Mathias Schindler]] ([[User talk:Mathias Schindler|talk]]) 18:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' It may be a tip in neutrality, but doing wht is right is more important than being neutral right now. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Thatiusguy0|Thatiusguy0]] ([[User talk:Thatiusguy0|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Thatiusguy0|contribs]]) 22:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' per [[User:Mathias Schindler|Mathias Schindler's]] thoughts based on [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel's]] comment. Reluctantly as I'd like a bigger impact but in this case targeting might be how to get that bigger impact. ([[User:Night w|Night w]] makes a similar point I have to agree with, too - US lawmakers don't seem to much care if the rest of the world disagreews when it comes to US security.) [[user:FT2|FT2]] ([[User_talk:FT2|Talk]] | [[Special:Emailuser/FT2|email]]) 18:55, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#: Very slim banner only, "This is what's going on in the US, show your support". A "protest this legislation" or heavy duty banner note might be less effective. The message for the United States is '''"this is what you're doing to your internet. And nobody else is going to hear about it or have its effects, except as an item on overseas news"'''. Slim banner to make the point that effectively, the rest of the world it's no effect. [[user:FT2|FT2]] ([[User_talk:FT2|Talk]] | [[Special:Emailuser/FT2|email]]) 20:02, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' USA politicians will only be concerned with USA voters so pointless to antagonise the rest of the world. --[[User:AlisonW|AlisonW]] ([[User talk:AlisonW|talk]]) 19:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' per AlisonW. [[User:Swatjester|⇒]][[User_talk:Swatjester|SWATJester]] [[WP:DC|Son of the Defender]] 19:05, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Teukros|Teukros]] ([[User talk:Teukros|talk]]) 19:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' '''[[User:Jujutacular|Jujutacular]]''' [[User talk:Jujutacular|talk]] 19:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' This strikes the right balance between involving the community but focusing the protest where it is directly relevant. Many users outside the U.S. will complain about any action (in my opinion not grasping its global implications), but in the interest of doing ''something'' we should focus where there will be less resistance. Note, I would support a global click-through blackout but not a global full blackout. [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]] [[User talk:Ocaasi|t ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Ocaasi| c]] 19:50, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# I'm willing to '''support''' but prefer to minimize inconvenience for people when it's less likely that they can effectively respond to the call. --[[User:Michael Snow|Michael Snow]] ([[User talk:Michael Snow|talk]]) 19:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' per Mike Peel. We need some form of action: short and clear. Greetings from Frankfurt Germany. -- [[User:Andreas Werle|Andreas Werle]] ([[User talk:Andreas Werle|talk]]) 19:56, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#I agree with [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jimbo_Wales&diff=471139360&oldid=471134892 what Jimbo said]. A global blackout won't do us much good. A global blackout might even [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Action&diff=471196613&oldid=471196465 annoy some users]. Nevertheless, I believe that non-US users need to see a banner so that they're aware of what's going on and why we're doing it. Some international pressure from the foreign press might do some good as well. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] ([[User talk:Michaeldsuarez|talk]]) 19:57, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' I'm also willing to provide some technical support in regards to this. If we don't make a stand, this bill will pass, and we'll be kicking ourselves for not doing enough to try to stop it. --[[User:Ryan lane|Ryan lane]] ([[User talk:Ryan lane|talk]]) 19:58, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' -[[User:Djsasso|DJSasso]] ([[User talk:Djsasso|talk]]) 20:00, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' Perhaps banners for those in other countries preachin' the gospel (like Mozilla did). [[User:SarahStierch|SarahStierch]] ([[User talk:SarahStierch|talk]]) 20:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 20:04, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:LoriLee|LoriLee]] ([[User talk:LoriLee|talk]]) 20:10, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Strong Support''' for this. I'll be blacking out my own site (small graphics developer) in support of Reddit and would very much like to see Wikipedia support it. Something needs to be done to wake up rank and file internet users in the US and time is of the utmost essence.[[User:Anarchistjim|Anarchistjim]] ([[User talk:Anarchistjim|talk]]) 20:45, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' — Everyone should be aware of our initiative, but it should only directly affect the viewing experience of U.S. readers. — <tt>[[User talk:Madman|madman]]</tt> 20:47, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Jorm|Jorm]] ([[User talk:Jorm|talk]]) 21:04, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Rayc|Rayc]] ([[User talk:Rayc|talk]]) 21:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Catlemur|Catlemur]] 15:00, 13 January 2012 (GMT)
#'''Support''' Most graphic method of driving home the point. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:173.11.124.154|173.11.124.154]] ([[User talk:173.11.124.154|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/173.11.124.154|contribs]]) 21:16, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#I support this action so long as it is limited to English Wikipedia only. The sister projects have not opted in, and there's no reason why consensus on English Wikipedia should be taken as consensus for other Wikimedia projects. Commons definitely ought not be blacked out given that it is used by non-English Wikipedias. Speaking as a Wikinews admin, I think that, if polled, the Wikinews community probably wouldn't want to participate. Given the size of the sister projects, it's no big deal - that you could still access Wikiquote or Wikiversity ''really'' won't affect the political impact of a Wikipedia shutdown. —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 20:53, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' +1 on this --[[Special:Contributions/75.80.212.166|75.80.212.166]] ([[User talk:75.80.212.166|talk]]) 21:46, 13 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|75.80.212.166}}
#'''Support''' This needs to happen to sufficiently raise awareness [[User:Geekwithsoul|Geekwithsoul]] ([[User talk:Geekwithsoul|talk]]) 22:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Jesant13|Jesant13]] ([[User talk:Jesant13|talk]]) 22:05, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Since this seems to be the most popular option, I'll put my vote towards this. I think a worldwide blackout would be much more effective, however. SOPA impacts everybody, and I think non-Americans need to be informed. A global backlash against the bill will be very powerful.--[[User:DfizzleShizzle|DfizzleShizzle]] ([[User talk:DfizzleShizzle|talk]]) 22:09, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' with (2) and (3) as second and third choices. This issue is critically important to our future. [[User:Jnork|Jnork]] ([[User talk:Jnork|talk]]) 22:34, 13 January, 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', very much yes. [[User:Teamsleep|Teamsleep]] ([[User talk:Teamsleep|talk]]) 13:02, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', I would also like (2)--[[User:Blood sliver|Blood sliver]] ([[User talk:Blood sliver|talk]]) 22:44, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Raises awareness to users everywhere, but keeps the focus where the issue can be most directly affected.--[[User:JayJasper|JayJasper]] ([[User talk:JayJasper|talk]]) 00:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Minimal banner for non-US, respecting that it's not their country, but they still may care --[[User:Ed Brey|Ed Brey]] ([[User talk:Ed Brey|talk]]) 00:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' <big>''' [[User:L337p4wn|L337p4wn]] '''</big>[[User_Talk:L337p4wn|Talk to me!]] 00:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' followed by (3), (2), and (4). We should only be acting like this if there's a near total consensus here on the issue and the importance. I believe that's the case here with SOPA. [[User:Bennetto|Bennetto]] ([[User talk:Bennetto|talk]]) 00:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. – [[User:Joe_N|Joe]] [[User talk:Joe_N|N]] 00:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:WngLdr34|Cleave and Smite, Delete and Tear! ]] ([[User talk:WngLdr34|talk]]) 00:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC) lets run this into the ground and shut down the entire website. The only way to fight fire is with fire, I will go (2) as a backup option myself.
#'''Support''', but happy with the other blackout/banner options too. [[User:Wittylama|Witty]][[User talk:wittylama|lama]] 01:01, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#Yes - [[User:Nolelover|'''Nolelover''']] [[User talk:Nolelover|'''Talk''']]·[[Special:Contributions/Nolelover|'''Contribs''']] 01:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' option 1 or 2, I do not think people will look at just another banner. [[User:Awk|Awk]] ([[User talk:Awk|talk]]) 01:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:AndrewPapp|AndrewPapp]] ([[User talk:AndrewPapp|talk]])But, at least for the US, it should not be an easy click-thru. It should direct people to write to their Congress reps and only end their blackout early if they do.
#'''Support''' [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Agent 78787|Agent 78787]] ([[User talk:Agent 78787|talk]]) 01:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The blackout should be a splash screen, and it should be targeted only to people who have representatives to contact (i.e. people in the U.S.) Even if foreign citizens contact Congress, they're not going to give them any impact. The splash screen should encourage people to take action, but not require them to do so. If they so choose, they should be able to decline and then use Wikipedia as normal. [[User:Superm401|Superm401]] - [[User_talk:Superm401|Talk]] 01:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:SirGeek CSP|SirGeek CSP]] ([[User talk:SirGeek CSP|talk]]) 01:44, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Aswn|Aswn]] ([[User talk:Aswn|talk]]) 01:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:TreyGeek|TreyGeek]] ([[User talk:TreyGeek|talk]]) 02:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Would be up for 1 or 2 --[[User:Nascar8FanGA|Nascar8FanGA]] ([[User talk:Nascar8FanGA|talk]]) 02:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# 1 or 2 — Carl ([[User:CBM|CBM]] · [[User talk:CBM|talk]]) 02:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' option 1 or 2 ~[[User:Feedintm|Feedintm]][[User talk:Feedintm|Parley]] 02:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:The Requiem|The Requiem]] ([[User talk:The Requiem|talk]]) 02:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Dkonstantinos|dkonstantinos]] ([[User talk:Dkonstantinos|talk]]) 02:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I think a blackout is a good way to raise awareness about the bill, and I feel banners are more prone to being ignored (especially so soon after the fundraising drive). However, I don't feel that blacking out Wikipedia outside of the U.S. is necessary, as this is a U.S. law and the lawmakers responsible for the bill are U.S. It will affect people around the world, yes, but I don't think a global blackout will change any lawmakers' minds. I '''strongly''' disagree, however, with the idea of requiring a visitor to contact his or her Congressman before he or she can access Wikipedia. Those who support the bill or do not want to take action of there own should not be punished. – [[User:GorillaWarfare|GorillaWarfare]] [[User talk:GorillaWarfare|(talk)]] 02:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' We should do this on the mobile site too. [[User:Lucasoutloud|Lucasoutloud]] ([[User talk:Lucasoutloud|talk]]) 02:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Would also support global as well — the Internet is not just national, and if the US does this, there will be global effects as well. Additionally there are considerable numbers of voting Americans abroad. --[[User:Mr.98|Mr.98]] ([[User talk:Mr.98|talk]]) 02:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' This will allow us to raise concern well domestically with the blackout and internationally with a banner. --[[User:Kylalak|Kylalak]] ([[User talk:Kylalak|talk]]) 03:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' The blackout will be unignorable. And I just think non-US users seeing a blackout pertaining to a US law might be made to feel like Wikipedia is not "for" them, like the assumed audience of Wikipedia is American. I don't like that idea, so that's why I support (1) rather than (2). [[User:Glowbee|Glowbee]] ([[User talk:Glowbee|talk]]) 03:01, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' seems to me a reasonable response. of course, many us citizens read other wp's, and many noncitizens read the english wp, but since the servers are in florida, the english wp has got to be the focus.[[User:Mercurywoodrose|Mercurywoodrose]] ([[User talk:Mercurywoodrose|talk]]) 03:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' This being US regulation, makes sense to go US only. [[User:TNLNYC|TNL]] ([[User talk:TNLNYC|talk]]) 03:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' as second choice, behind full worldwide blackout. This legislation will affect the Internet, which is worldwide, not just the US. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] [[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]] 03:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' Only an actual blackout for US users will have a sufficiently large impact to get this movement noticed in the way it needs to be.[[User:Dlswain|Dlswain]] ([[User talk:Dlswain|talk]]) 03:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' USA politicians will only be concerned with USA voters [[Special:Contributions/Who|«»]][[User:Who|Who]][[User talk:Who|?¿?]] 03:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' This is a serious enough issue to draw attention, more in the US than elsewhere. As the bill(s) would have far-reaching effects that extend beyond the borders of the US, it makes sense for something to be broadcast outside the US as well. [[User:Spiffulent|Spiffulent]] ([[User talk:Spiffulent|talk]]) 03:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' If we do have a blackout, it should be a page explaining the impact of SOPA on Wikipedia. The banner can redirect to the blackout page, with comments explaining what SOPA is. --[[User:Dialh|Dial]] ([[User talk:Dialh|talk]]) 04:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Farlo|Farlo]] ([[User talk:Farlo|talk]]) 04:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' This is not a a purely "political" act, SOPA potentially endangers the freedom of Wikipedia by allowing pages to willy-nilly be shut down. This is a HUGE deal. -- [[User:Cabazap|Alyas Grey]] : [[User talk:Cabazap|talk]] 04:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Ktdreyer|Ktdreyer]] ([[User talk:Ktdreyer|talk]]) 04:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:VQuakr|VQuakr]] ([[User talk:VQuakr|talk]]) 04:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Has the foundation considered moving the project to a more friendly environment?[[User:Brianyoumans|Brianyoumans]] ([[User talk:Brianyoumans|talk]]) 04:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Wikipedia should be more politically and legally active when the project is at risk. [[User:Savidan|Savidan]] 04:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:QuartierLatin1968|Q·L·]]''[[User talk:QuartierLatin1968|1968]]'' [[Special:Contributions/QuartierLatin1968|☿]] 04:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Doing so has my full support. We live in a democracy and we must make our voices heard. --[[User:MusicGeek101|MusicGeek101]] ([[User talk:MusicGeek101|talk]]) 05:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Wikipedia do your part. [[User:Mypagesarecool|Mypagesarecool]] ([[User talk:Mypagesarecool|talk]]) 05:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' We need to express ourselves with a blackout, but we also need to explain to all what is happening in the USA. [[User:Etineskid|Etineskid]][[User talk:Etineskid|(talk)]] 05:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I still feel it would be more pointed to just target this at the U.S. House and Senate IPs, as well as those of the companies and organizations that support SOPA/PIPA, but if this coordinates with what other sites are doing, like Reddit, we're stronger doing it with them. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 05:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' actual '''reddit style''' blackout. The whole point is to demonstrate what the internet is like without Wikipedia. [[User:Froth|.froth.]] ([[User talk:Froth|talk]]) 05:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# 1st choice. --[[User:Guerillero|Guerillero]] | [[User_talk:Guerillero|My Talk]] 06:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' and make the American users unable to use Wiki with a big banner, for that day. [[User:Saffy21|Saffy21]] ([[User talk:Saffy21|talk]]) 06:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Twp|—Tim Pierce]] ([[User talk:Twp|talk]]) 06:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''': It is a global issue, no doubt, but the legislation is for America only, so we should keep the blackout to America. [[User:Jarmihi|Jarmihi]] ([[User talk:Jarmihi|talk]]) 06:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Equaaldoors|Equaaldoors]] ([[User talk:Equaaldoors|talk]]) 06:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' but (2) is also an acceptable alternative. [[User:Loserpenguin15|Loserpenguin15]] ([[User talk:Loserpenguin15|talk]]) 06:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Blockout is our only weapon at the moment to protest this, let it be an important day [[User:Djp3rso|el diablo es la ignorancia]] ([[User talk:Djp3rso|talk]]) 06:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Zhang5|Zhang5]] ([[User talk:Zhang5|talk]]) 07:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC) Edit: Also I support that we put up banners well in advance of the 18th.
#'''Support''' [[User:Dkriegls|Dkriegls]] ([[User talk:Dkriegls|talk]]) 07:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Iconofiler|Iconofiler]] ([[User talk:Iconofiler|talk]]) 07:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' action needs to be taken. I signed the petition on sopastrike.com and demandprogress.org, I will sign here too. [[User:Akihironihongo|Akihironihongo]] ([[User talk:Akihironihongo|talk]]) 07:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Monowi|Monowi]] ([[User talk:Monowi|talk]]) 07:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Wikipedia must take a stand to defend freedom on the internet. U.S. users especially need this message now, but all Wikipedians should be informed of the dangers of these censorship concepts. [[User:Sonicsuns|Sonicsuns]] ([[User talk:Sonicsuns|talk]]) 07:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''support''' While I believe that too few people outside the US are aware of what's going on, I think a global blackout might confuse (what congressperson? I don't have a congressperson...) and annoy those who feel it is completely irrelevant. That said, failing this, I'd rather go big than tone it down: 2 is second choice. <edit: this for the splash screen, not full blackout.>[[User talk:Sonia|sonia]]♫ 07:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' 1 and 3 are both adequate. I agree it should be enwiki and geolocated in the US. I also like the banners, as otherwise, I wouldn't have known about this issue. Perhaps blackout to US users and banner for others. After reading the proposals, it's utter rubbish, and the US public should do whatever it takes to get their voice heard. [[User:Captain Courageous|Captain Courageous]] ([[User talk:Captain Courageous|talk]]) 07:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#[[User:CharlieEchoTango|CharlieEchoTango]] ([[User talk:CharlieEchoTango#top|contact]]) 07:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Cybercobra|Cybercobra]] [[User talk:Cybercobra|(talk)]] 08:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Seewolf|Seewolf]] ([[User talk:Seewolf|talk]]) 08:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Banners are often ignored, so more is needed, and as long as there is still access (albeit somewhat more circuitous) a blackout is sensible. I like the idea of warning about the blackout in advance. [[User:DopplerRadioShow|DopplerRadioShow]] ([[User talk:DopplerRadioShow|talk]]) 08:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' '''[[User:Elektrik Shoos|elektrik]][[Special:Contributions/Elektrik Shoos|SHOOS]]''' ([[User talk:Elektrik Shoos|talk]]) 08:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Perlit|Perlit]] ([[User talk:Perlit|talk]]) 09:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC) I find (2) also acceptable
#'''Support''' [[User:Vorziblix|Vorziblix]] ([[User talk:Vorziblix|talk]]) 09:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Let's not do that 'America thing' and plague the world with our problems. A banner is great, especially for US citizens living overseas, where they may not have been exposed to information about to SOPA. As for the US, let no American escape. [[User:ZiltoidTheOmnicient|Commander Ziltiod]] ([[User talk:ZiltoidTheOmnicient|speak]]) 09:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' SOPA affects every person in the US, and our community must take a stand against it. The bill also has the potential to affect Wikipedia itself, so we should let the world know our stand... but not black them out, that's dangerously like doing SOPA's job for it. For those voting in support of (5), and (6) who are quoting [[WP:NPOV]], [[WP:SOAP]], or similar (ad there are some), a question: How do you reconcile that stance with the fact that you're participating in this conversation? An assertion that [[WP:NPOV]] should extend to more than article content seems inherently self-contradictory. [[User:FeRD NYC|FeRD_NYC]] ([[User talk:FeRD NYC|talk]]) 09:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I'd love to see Wikipedia taking part in this. The blackout should be US only (I do like the idea of a clickthrough to allow people to access articles after seeing the blackout). Non-US countries should get a banner so that those in a position to affect US policy -- traveling or expatriate US citizens, for example -- should be a position to do so. [[User:Gaurav|Gaurav]] ([[User talk:Gaurav|talk]]) 10:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Though, I would also support a worldwide blackout (maybe more, but not sure if it's "fair" since it is a US law) [[User:Phoenixia1177|Phoenixia1177]] ([[User talk:Phoenixia1177|talk]]) 10:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' SOPA is way to vague if we want something like this to make sure creative people get what they deserve it needs to be more specific. although not the "worlds" problem i would appreciate what support we can get from anyone. however, international users shouldn't be punished for the US sucking, which is why i support here, but if they can help in anyway i'll love them forever (aka, be a better more involved human being, who continues to give a shit, but takes more action to help the world)i'm sure this makes very little sense but i just woke up for work at 5:40 am EST[[User:Killemall22|Killemall22]] ([[User talk:Killemall22|talk]]) 10:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# US Politicians are out of control. They are here to sever the people, not corporations. I support US Blackout only [[User talk:pldinesh2|pldinesh2]] 11:11 AM, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' per Mike Peel. -- [[User:Kh80|kh80]] ([[User talk:Kh80|talk]]) 11:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Wvk|Wvk]] ([[User talk:Wvk|talk]]) 11:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' -- Users outside the U.S. do not have any influence on U.S. politics. They should be informed about the protests, but they should not be hindered from using Wikipedia.--[[User:Aschmidt|Aschmidt]] ([[User talk:Aschmidt|talk]]) 11:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Blackout will have a massive cost to this project as it annoys millions of potential donators and editors, causing many people to make decision to never donate or contribute to Wikipedia. In fact, this blackout protest probably harms Wikipedia more than SOPA ever could. So please keep it as limited as possible. [[User:ML|ML]] ([[User talk:ML|talk]]) 12:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Sławomir Biały|Sławomir Biały]] ([[User talk:Sławomir Biały|talk]]) 12:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# jo, US-only. push them back to reason but keep the (global) nuke in the base for now. sadly, we may need it soon enough, regards --[[User:Jan eissfeldt|Jan eissfeldt]] ([[User talk:Jan eissfeldt|talk]]) 12:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' —[[User:Ed!|'''Ed!''']][[User talk:Ed!|'''(talk)''']] 12:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Strong Support''' [[Special:Contributions/109.150.245.44|109.150.245.44]] ([[User talk:109.150.245.44|talk]]) 12:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:Covracer|covracer]] ([[User talk:Covracer|talk]]) 13:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Wormcast|Wormcast]] ([[User talk:Wormcast|talk]]) 13:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#:<s>'''Support'''. I have some sympathy for option (2) because the proposed legislation has global impact since the U.S. based servers have global reach. However, only the U.S. audience has significant influence on U.S legislators. ~ [[User:Ningauble|Ningauble]] ([[User talk:Ningauble|talk]]) 13:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)</s>
#:I am advised by a 'bot, acting on behalf of a consensus of administrators, that my responses to this RfC are inapplicable or unclear. Whereas my response to the above captioned proposition represents my best effort to communicate my position on that specific proposition, and whereas it has been deemed unacceptable, I am therefore striking it and withdrawing from this RfC. ~ [[User:Ningauble|Ningauble]] ([[User talk:Ningauble|talk]]) 23:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''--[[User:Wisdomtenacit/small>/span>]]) 07:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Cybercobra|yfocus|WTF]] ([[User talk:Wisdomtenacityfocus|talk]]) 13:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- [[User talk:Donald Albury|Donald Albury]] 14:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC) -Blackout US only, banner for all users -- [[User talk:Donald Albury|Donald Albury]] 16:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I am in favor of any or all options for expressing opposition to SOPA. -- [[User:Frankie1969|Frankie1969]] ([[User talk:Frankie1969|talk]]) 14:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:B-I-G and S-M-R-T!!1!|B-I-G and S-M-R-T!!1!]] ([[User talk:B-I-G and S-M-R-T!!1!|talk]]) 20:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#: '''Object''' to voters being asked to not oppose some options while other options have oppose sections. This makes interpreting the results a matter of comparing apples and oranges. I oppose this option on the grounds that the copyright industry is pushing similar legislation in multiple countries. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 14:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#::This first question is multiple choice rather than support/oppose. There are six options, the last of which is to do nothing. Simply vote for the one you want. No need to oppose the others. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] [[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]] 15:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#:::I understand that, but I still object to making some options multiple choice and others support/oppose. Such differences inject subtle biases. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]])
#: '''Object''' in concurrence with [[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] on all accounts. [[User:Sgravn|Stuart Ravn]] ([[User talk:Sgravn|talk]]) 08:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Very Strong Support'''. The click through idea is rather clever, and I think it would work very effectively. --[[User:Torchflame|Torchflame]] ([[User talk:Torchflame|talk]]) 14:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The threat to the free availability to information needs to be addressed --[[User_talk:Trödel|Trödel]] 15:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[Special:Contributions/71.175.53.239|71.175.53.239]] ([[User talk:71.175.53.239|talk]]) 15:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Narayan89|Narayan89]] ([[User talk:Narayan89|talk]]) 15:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Zinger0|Zinger0]] ([[User talk:Zinger0|talk]]) 16:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Church of emacs|Tobias]] ([[User Talk:Church of emacs|Talk]]) 16:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#""Support"" -- Lets do this thing. The internet and wikipedia have brought enormous happiness and knowledge to my life and need to be protected.--[[User:Scarfieasbro|Scarfieasbro]]([[User Talk:Scarfieasbro|Scarfieasbro]] 11:15, 14 January 2012 (Eastern)
#'''Support''' We need to take a stand on this important issue. It's too big for us to ignore it.--[[User:Secret Saturdays|Secret Saturdays]] ([[User Talk:Secret Saturdays|talk to me]])[[ Special:RecentChanges|'''''what's new?''''']] 16:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. We may not be interested in politics, but politics is interested in us. --[[User talk:Gwern |Gwern]] [[Special:Contributions/Gwern | (contribs)]] 16:32 14 January 2012 (GMT)
#'''Support''' Yes, people should be able to click through it but it really should be a LARGE, noticeable black landing page with an attention-getting white headline, a concise summary, and a call to action and how users can make a difference. It should provide outside links to how SOPA and PIPA could hurt the internet and an easy way to contact your local representative. The point is, people should be forced to read it and find a way to close out before they continue to whatever article they were looking for, otherwise what's the point.
#'''Support''' [[User:Dan653|Dan653]] ([[User talk:Dan653|talk]]) 17:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- [[User:Scokee|Scokee]] 17:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - Option 2 also okay. As long as content is accessible I have no problem with "consensing" with this, although the actual threat of SOPA to Wikipedia (as opposed to say YouTube or Archive.org) seems extremely low. [[User:Carrite|Carrite]] ([[User talk:Carrite|talk]]) 17:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The banner for non-us users will alert others to what all the fuss is about, and alert then to the potential world-wide consequences of SOPA.
# '''Support''' --[[User:Voyager|Voyager]] ([[User talk:Voyager|talk]]) 17:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#[[User:Algamicagrat|Algamicagrat]] ([[User talk:Algamicagrat#top|talk]]) 17:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''
#'''Very Strong Support''' - [[User:Enkrates|Enkrates]] ([[User talk:Enkrates|talk]]) 17:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Very Strong Support''' with 2 as a second option. --[[User:Radiokid1010|Radiokid1010]] ([[User talk:Radiokid1010|talk]]) 17:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' -- [[User:PaleAqua|PaleAqua]] ([[User talk:PaleAqua|talk]]) 17:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' de [[User:Mediator Scientiae|''Mediātōre Scientiae'']] ([[User talk:Mediator Scientiae|discutere]]) 18:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- Time to make a stand and raise awareness, and in a way that ultimately does not harm the project. --'''[[User:McDoobAU93|McDoob]][[User talk:McDoobAU93|AU]][[Special:Contributions/McDoobAU93|93]]''' 18:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', first choice, with 2 as second choice. There's no need to black out our worldwide users, but educating them about what's going on here can only help us. [[User:TotientDragooned|TotientDragooned]] ([[User talk:TotientDragooned|talk]]) 18:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' This or (3). I don't think we should be forcing a blackout on people from other countries, but it wouldn't be a bad thing to let them know what's going on. --[[User:ScorpSt|Scorp Stanton]] ([[User talk:ScorpSt|talk]]) 18:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Jdforrester|James F.]] [[User talk:Jdforrester|(talk)]] 18:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support'''. This seems like a rational response to [[SOPA]]. [[User:Dmarquard|Dmarquard]] ([[User talk:Dmarquard|talk]]) 18:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# "Support"* Support per [[User:Amanjsingh|AJ Sethi]]. Wikipedia is used by a lot of non-technical folks out there. The need to rope in as many people who are not involved in Web/Internet fields is important. Wikipedia outage can help raise this cause.
#'''Support''' SOPA and Protect-IP pretty much only extend to the US. Of course, there are already countries that considered the option of Internet censorship like Spain, so 2 is also a viable idea. --[[User:Mistermister93]] ([[User talk:Mistermister93|talk]]) 10:23 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' but (2) would be acceptable also -- [[User:Amillar|Amillar]] ([[User talk:Amillar|talk]]) 18:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Blackout Wikipedia in ALL countries. US internet policy has a habit of spreading across the world, make the stand here and we won't have to worry about other SOPA bills passing in other countries. --[[User:If it bleeds we can kill it]]
# '''Support''' [[User:Tinlash|Tinlash]] ([[User talk:Tinlash|talk]]) 18:44, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' Personally, I feel that Wikimedia, as a collective foundation, must take every action in its power to oppose SOPA and PIPA, both of which I oppose because the consequences of them may violate our First Amendment rights, censor and cripple the Internet, and threaten free speech, thereby jeopardizing the quality of human life and liberty. That said, I also feel that Wikipedia should have the same restrictions on copyright violations worldwide as it has in the United States. --[[User:SethAllen623|Seth Allen]] ([[User talk:SethAllen623|discussion]]/[[Special:Contribs/SethAllen623|contributions]]) 18:29, Saturday, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' US-only click-thru blackout. Only US citizens have any clout when petitioning their Congressional representatives. A global full blackout would direct user anger at Wikimedia, not Congress, where it belongs.
#'''Support''' [[User:Dachvid]] Saturday 14 2012 (UTC) Passage of this law and signature by OUR sometime president would be a disaster.{{spa|Dachvid}}
#'''Support''' - the American people, the people that can influence their appointed leaders, need to be aware of what is happening and this is the best way to do it [[User:Taketa|Taketa]] ([[User talk:Taketa|talk]]) 19:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I agree with AlisonW-2012 is an election year in the United States and we should a message to our public officials. Thank you-[[User:RFD|RFD]] ([[User talk:RFD|talk]]) 19:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' A black-out to US American users (IP type blocking?) or English version of Wikipedia. All that should be visible for the blackout should be a message about SOPA/PIPA and all Wikimedia pages (Wikipedia, Wiktionary, Wikia, etc) should display a banner (like the fundraising ones) that warns about SOPA/PIPA and tells users/visitors how they can help. -- [[User:Azemocram|Azemocram]] ([[User talk:Azemocram|talk]]) 19:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:dllahr|dllahr]]
#'''Support''' [[User:Jeremyb|Jeremyb]] ([[User talk:Jeremyb|talk]]) 20:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn|talk]]) 20:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - This makes sense to me. --[[User:Talvieno|Talvieno]] ([[User talk:Talvieno|talk]]) 20:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Itu|Itu]] ([[User talk:Itu|talk]]) 20:44, 14 January 2012 (UTC) Me too.
#'''Support''' - Limited support for (2) as well [[User:Ojchase|Ojchase]] ([[User talk:Ojchase|talk]]) 20:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - US only blackout makes sense to me.
#'''Support''' - The banner for non-us users will alert others to what all the fuss is about, and alert then to the potential world-wide consequences of SOPA.
#'''Support''' - I share the same feelings as the previous supporters have expressed. Since this is a law that would affect American citizens, I feel the blackout should only affect us. But, since it's such a major campaign, a banner should be displayed for all other countries, too.[[User:EMathison|EMathison]]{{spa|EMathison}}
#'''Support''' - [[User:CaptainTickles|CaptainTickles]] ([[User talk:CaptainTickles|talk]]) 21:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --'''[[User:Gourami Watcher|GouramiWatcher]]''' [[User talk:Gourami Watcher|(Gulp)]] 21:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Emw|Emw]] ([[User talk:Emw|talk]]) 21:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:RainbowOfLight|RainbowOfLight]] [[User_Talk:RainbowOfLight|Talk]] 21:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Sargoth|Sargoth]] ([[User talk:Sargoth|talk]]) 21:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- A banner alone would not be enough to have a meaningful impact. [[User:Vencetti|Vencetti]]{{spa|Vencetti}}
#'''Support''' --[[User:Ksnortum|KSnortum]] ([[User talk:Ksnortum|talk]]) 22:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- While I do show solidarity to my US friends, I don't think we from the rest of the world should suffer because of the US politicians arrogance [[User:Deusdies|Deusdies]] 23:23, 14 January 2012 (CET)
#'''Support''' -- [[User:Bab72|Bab72]] ([[User talk:Bab72|talk]]) 22:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- Only US users will be able to influence the Congresscritters, so it's pointless blacking out the rest of the world, but leave the banner to let everyone else know what's going on. -- [[User:Arwel Parry|Arwel Parry]] [[User_talk:Arwel Parry|(talk)]] 23:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- [[User:TransporterMan|'''TransporterMan''']] ([[User talk:TransporterMan|TALK]]) 23:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- [[User:Hayesgm|Geoff]] ([[User talk:Hayesgm|talk]]) 23:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- [[User:Clementi]] 16:37 14 January 2012 GMT-7
#'''Support''' -- [[User:Zaphraud]] 16:40 14 January 2012 GMT-7 (Arizona)
#'''Support''' -- [[User:Crkey|Crkey]] ([[User talk:Crkey|talk]]) 00:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- — [[User:Iune|Ines]][[User talk:Iune|(talk)]] 00:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- [[User:Prolixium]] 19:18, 14 January 2012 (EST)
#'''Support''' -- [[User:LegacyOfValor]] 16:46, 14 January 2012 (PST)
#'''Support''' -- Don't punish global users who have no democratic control over Congress.[[User:Erudy|Erudy]] ([[User talk:Erudy|talk]]) 01:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' on much the same ground as others - I would oppose a blackout that affects people who have can no say in the process. But a banner to inform them of what is happening makes sense. - [[User:Bilby|Bilby]] ([[User talk:Bilby|talk]]) 01:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Nathan0n5ire|Nathan0n5ire]] ([[User talk:Nathan0n5ire|talk]]) 01:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' on grounds that we need to make a strong statement in USA; banner raises awareness of the issue elsewhere, and for Americans abroad. [[User:Paulmnguyen|Paul M. Nguyen]] ([[User_talk:Paulmnguyen|chat]]|[[Special:Contributions/Paulmnguyen|blame]]) 02:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- I heartily support a blackout, but feel that a U.S. only blackout would be most reasonable, since those users are likely the only ones who will be able to make a difference. [[User:Mesoderm|Mesoderm]] ([[User talk:Mesoderm|talk]]) 02:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- Sometimes, we as a community have to make tough decisions. This is on of them.[[User:Amadscientist|Amadscientist]] ([[User talk:Amadscientist|talk]]) 03:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - [[User:Aibara|Aibara]] ([[User talk:Aibara|talk]]) 03:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- [[User:CuboneKing|CuboneKing]] ([[User talk:CuboneKing|talk]]) 03:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' -- [[User:Apmiller|Apmiller]] ([[User talk:Apmiller|talk]]) 03:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' with #2 as a reasonable second option. [[User:Qwyrxian|Qwyrxian]] ([[User talk:Qwyrxian|talk]]) 03:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Jkvannort|jkv]] ([[User talk:Jkvannort|talk]]) 03:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- I cautiously add that if SOPA go forward, more extensive action (i.e full Blackout) should be seriously considered. For the moment, this seems sufficient. [[User:Random articles|RandomArticles]] 03:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''
#'''SUPPORT'''=[[User:AlejandrosFu|AlejandrosFu]]
# '''Support''' - [[User:DanielRenfro|DanielRenfro]] ([[User talk:DanielRenfro|talk]]) 05:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''--[[User:Found5dollar|Found5dollar]] ([[User talk:Found5dollar|talk]]) 05:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I agree, it really sucks and I wish congress to do not pass this bill. [[User:Jj98|JJ98]] ([[User talk:Jj98|talk]]) 05:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''--[[User:Argos'Dad|Argos']][[User talk:Argos'Dad|Dad]] 05:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''--This might get tricky later on, but I say it's good. [[User:Docktur Todd|Docktur Todd]] ([[User talk:Docktur Todd|talk]]) 06:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' -- I think this is the optimal solution; choice 2 may be overkill, though it would be my second choice. [[User:Xtifr|Xtifr]] [[User talk:Xtifr|tälk]] 07:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. — [[User:FleetCommand|Fleet Command]] ([[User talk:FleetCommand|talk]]) 07:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''-- I support all options for a high-profile public statement against SOPA, although I understand the concerns of those editors who oppose the protest. I believe that this threat goes to the core of Wikipedia's mission, and that opposition to Wikipedia becoming a general political advocate ought not to prevent opposition to particular measures that might make it impossible for Wikipedia to exist in its current form. [[User:Cullen328|'''Cullen'''328]] [[User talk:Cullen328|''Let's discuss it'']] 07:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Skinsmoke|Skinsmoke]] ([[User talk:Skinsmoke|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Anoopan|Anoopan]] ([[User talk:Anoopan|talk]]) 07:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Triquetra|Triquetra]] ([[User talk:Triquetra|talk]]) 07:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Let Americans know how the world can run ahead of us. Encourage the whole world to sign a petition in support of US citizens. [[User:Hozelda|Hozelda]] ([[User talk:Hozelda|talk]]) 08:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. — [[User:Apo-kalypso|Apo-kalypso]] ([[User talk:Apo-kalypso|talk]]) 08:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''—No sense in damaging the site with a worldwide blackout, at least not initially, when it's a US-centred problem. [[User:Tony1|'''Tony''']] [[User talk:Tony1|(talk)]] 08:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' This is a US Act not international law so a global blackout is not necessary, but a US blackout is enough to make a point about it in the US aka the place it affects. However I have no objection with a global banner as people can easily close it with the "x" icon if they don't want to view it whilst on the site. Then lets say a similar act in the future being proposed in the UK or another country, we can have a UK blackout and a global banner. [[User:IJA|IJA]] ([[User talk:IJA|talk]]) 08:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Smurfix|smurfix]] ([[User talk:Smurfix|talk]]) 08:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''--[[User:Eugen844|Eugen844]] ([[User talk:Eugen844|talk]]) 08:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:Anna Frodesiak|Anna Frodesiak]] ([[User talk:Anna Frodesiak|talk]]) 08:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:La Corona|La Corona]] ([[User talk:La Corona|talk]]) 08:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Prav001|Prav001]] ([[User talk:Prav001|talk]]) 09:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' . --[[Special:Contributions/216.131.118.170|216.131.118.170]] ([[User talk:216.131.118.170|talk]]) 09:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Jane023|Jane]] ([[User talk:Jane023|talk]]) 09:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC) I was awed by the [[:it:Wikipedia:Comunicato_4_ottobre_2011/en|Italy strike]]. Besides the politcal statement, the Italy strike 1) let Italians know that Wikipedia is the result of individuals, and not a government-owned public service like the railroads or garbage collection and 2) supplied people the tools and teeth to participate in debate, rather than just feeding them information. Though I feel a global blackout would be best, I feel this is not fair to Britain and Australia. [[User:Jane023|Jane]] ([[User talk:Jane023|talk]]) 09:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:Denis Barthel|Denis Barthel]] ([[User talk:Denis Barthel|talk]]) 09:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Przemub|Przemub]] ([[User talk:Przemub|talk]]) 09:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Blackout US only, as foreign users cannot influence the US government, while American users can: they can protest and file petitions against SOPA. --[[User:Anthony Ivanoff|Anthony Ivanoff]] ([[User talk:Anthony Ivanoff|talk]]) 10:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Peter.loader|Peter Loader]] ([[User talk:Peter.loader|talk]]) 10:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Byrappa|Vishwas M Byrappa]]
#'''Support''' - From someone outside the US (although I would accept option 2) [[User:Aircorn|AIR'''''corn''''']] [[User talk:Aircorn|(talk)]] 10:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Grancapo13|Grancapo13]] ([[User talk:Grancapo13|talk]]) 10:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Spartan S58|Spartan S58]] ([[User talk:Spartan S58|talk]]) 10:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This seems optimal. As a person outside the U.S. I am concerned, and would be impacted by SOPA, however I do not have a congressman I can write to (or withhold a vote from) [[User:LukeSurl|LukeSurl]] [[User Talk:LukeSurl|t]] [[Special:Contributions/LukeSurl|c]] 10:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:Милан Јелисавчић|Milan.j]] ''([[User talk:Милан Јелисавчић|talk]])'' 10:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Kaihsu|Kaihsu]] ([[User talk:Kaihsu|talk]]) 11:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - if those of us who are not US voters cannot make any useful protests or representations about SOPA, then it seems harsh, and likely to antagonise non-US readers, to blackout WP for us for the day. And please ensure that the language of the banner avoids "American English" words or spellings like "fiber", as it will be aimed at a global audience. [[User:PamD|'''''Pam''''']][[User talk:PamD|'''''D''''']] 10:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#—[[User:S Marshall|'''S Marshall''']] [[User talk:S Marshall|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/S Marshall|C]] 11:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Wpoely86|wpoely86]] ([[User talk:Wpoely86|talk]]) 11:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' — [[User:Elmindreda|elmindreda]] ([[User talk:Elmindreda|talk]]) 11:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Kruusamägi|Ivo]] ([[User talk:Kruusamägi|talk]]) 11:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Other places are helpless so why affect them? ~~[[User:Ebe123|Ebe123]]~~ → [[User talk:Ebe123|report]] on my [[Special:Contributions/Ebe123|contribs]]. 11:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''': [[User:Adam4267|Adam4267]] ([[User talk:Adam4267|talk]]) 11:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''': US Only: This is not global - we can move the servers [[User:Victuallers|Victuallers]] ([[User talk:Victuallers|talk]]) 12:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Mattaidepikiw|Mattaidepikiw]] ([[User talk:Mattaidepikiw|talk]]) 12:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''': This is US legislation, so Americans most immediately need to know what it means. There is no point blocking out Wikipedia in countries that may not even have anything like SOPA in the works. The world needs to know what's happening, however. [[User:Curly Turkey|CüRlyTüRkey]][[User_talk:Curly Turkey|Talk]][[Special:Contributions/Curly Turkey|Contribs]] 12:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Danh|Danh]] ([[User talk:Danh|talk]]) 12:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Oneiros|Oneiros]] ([[User talk:Oneiros|talk]]) 12:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:Mazbln|Mazbln]] ([[User talk:Mazbln|talk]]) 12:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Non-US users have no influence over US legislators; inconveniencing us serves no purpose. An informative banner would suffice [[User:Dtellett|Dtellett]] ([[User talk:Dtellett|talk]]) 12:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:jamescook83|jamescook83]]
#'''Support'''. [[User:Ariadacapo|Ariadacapo]] ([[User talk:Ariadacapo|talk]]) 12:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Aflis|Aflis]] ([[User talk:Aflis|talk]]) 12:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This is an American problem, but citizens of other repressive governments should be shown they CAN make a difference when they work together.
#'''Support'''. [[User:yankhadenuf|yankhadenuf]]
#'''Support''' that would be the preferable solution. -- [[User:Luk|Luk]] [[User talk:Luk|talk]] 13:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''.[[User:Sole Soul|Sole Soul]] ([[User talk:Sole Soul|talk]]) 13:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Axl|'''Axl''']] ¤ [[User talk:Axl|[Talk]]] 13:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - '''[[User:Chrism|Chrism]]''' ''[[User_talk:Chrism|would like to hear from you]]'' 13:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', though (2) would be preferable to not joining the blackout at all. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 14:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Chenzw|Chenzw]]  [[User_talk:Chenzw|Talk]]  14:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Fieldafar|Fieldafar]] ([[User talk:Fieldafar|talk]]) 14:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Avarhilien|Avarhilien]] ([[User talk:Avarhilien|talk]]) 14:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Extraneus|Extraneus]] ([[User talk:Extraneus|talk]]) 14:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Jacob J. Walker|Jacob J. Walker]] ([[User talk:Jacob J. Walker|talk]]) 14:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''.--[[User:Sergio.R.F.Oliveira|Sergio.R.F.Oliveira]] ([[User talk:Sergio.R.F.Oliveira|talk]]) 14:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:4th-otaku|4th-otaku]] ([[User talk:4th-otaku|talk]]) 14:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Quolav|Quolav]] ([[User talk:Quolav|talk]]) 14:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. ([[User:Midnightblueowl|Midnightblueowl]] ([[User talk:Midnightblueowl|talk]]) 15:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC))
#'''Support'''. Since it a US bill, blackout (only) in US makes sense. It ''does'' affect the people outside US but they can't do anything much about it. Global Banners can raise awareness among other nations about these laws without affecting their Wikipedia experience. A global blackout as suggested in (2) won't be fair. [[User:Trunks ishida|trunks_ishida]] ([[User talk:Trunks ishida|talk]]) 15:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:ArishiaNishi|ArishiaNishi]] ([[User talk:ArishiaNishi|talk]]) 15:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The whole world should be made aware of SOPA, The effects of the blackout need to be felt at least in the USA; a blackout in the rest of the world might gain more publicity, but the one that counts is the US. --[[User:Ohconfucius|Ohconfucius]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius|¡digame!]] 15:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''.[[User:Edinburgh Wanderer|Edinburgh]] [[User talk:Edinburgh Wanderer|Wanderer]] 15:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Folks outside US definitely need to be aware of this, but we can't do anything about it. Besides, if you still allow US users to use Tor or foreign proxies to access the content, that gives the nice impression of "see, have you considered that some people have to do this ''daily'', and if this law passes, ''you'' might have to get used to that too." ''[[User:Wwwwolf|wwwwolf]]'' ([[User talk:Wwwwolf|barks]]/[[Special:Contributions/Wwwwolf|growls]]) 15:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This seems appropriate because if, say, New Zealand Wikipedians wanted to protest a similar local law, it is probably doubtful that they could ever get consensus for a global block. So a local block in this case sets the right precedent.--[[User:FormerIP|FormerIP]] ([[User talk:FormerIP|talk]]) 16:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. People outside the US can't do anything about SOPA, but they should at least know about it. [[User:Theon144|Theon144]] ([[User talk:Theon144|talk]]) 16:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Vitor Mazuco|Vitor Mazuco]] [[User talk:Vitor Mazuco|Talk!]] 16:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. ... [[User:discospinster|'''disco''''''''spinster''''']] [[User talk:discospinster|'''talk''']] 16:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Tyrol5|'''Tyrol5''']] [[User talk:Tyrol5|[Talk]]] 16:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Bk1 168|Bk1 168]] ([[User talk:Bk1 168|talk]]) 16:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. If there are any other countries considering this kind of legislation, I'd like to suggest a 'sympathy blackout' as well. [[User:Trdsf|The Rev]] ([[User talk:Trdsf|talk]]) 16:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. A banner will not do enough. Blackout is needed.
#'''Support''' [[User:Prysewhert|Prysewhert]] 16:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. SOPA is a credible threat to the whole internet, and Wikipedia, being one of the top sites visited by US citizens is an incredible resource to oppose it. [[User:Gamersedge|Gamersedge]] ([[User talk:Gamersedge|talk]]) 16:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Vidnel|Vidnel]] ([[User talk:Vidnel|talk]]) 16:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Henridv|Henridv]] ([[User talk:Henridv|talk]]) 17:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:History2007|History2007]] ([[User talk:History2007|talk]]) 17:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:Krischan111|Krischan111]] ([[User talk:Krischan111|talk]]) 17:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''.World wide blackout is needed, show other websites that you are a part of them. [[User:HunterZone|HunterZone]] ([[User talk:HunterZone|talk]]) 17:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Petervidani|Petervidani]] ([[User talk:Petervidani|talk]]) 17:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Act now or regret it later. [[User:JohnMannV|JohnMannV]] ([[User talk:JohnMannV|talk]]) 17:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. - [[User:Bagel7|Bagel7]][[User talk:Bagel7|T's]] 17:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. I strongly support a US blackout and a world-wide banner. I don't think this violates NPOV because we are not talking about an article; we are talking about an issue that could impact WP's ability to continue its mission. Dave ([[User:Djkernen|djkernen]])|[[User talk:Djkernen|Talk to me]]|[[WP:Community Portal#Open tasks|Please help!]] 17:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:Vitaebrevis|Vitaebrevis]] ([[User talk:Vitaebrevis|talk]]) 01:01, 15 January 2012‎ (UTC){{spa|Vitaebrevis}}
#'''Support''' --[[User:Aude|Aude]] ([[User talk:Aude|talk]]) 17:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Weak Support''' Though I am only in favour of a "soft blackout," a banner can help to draw attention to the situation in the US and perhaps make connexions to laws in other jurisdictions that have been proposed (e.g. HADOPI) in order to reenforce the message that this is not just a US problem. [[User:Petropetro|Petropetro]] ([[User talk:Petropetro|talk]]) 17:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#''''Support'''' I am in support of a US blackout with only a message explaining SOPA and no option to continue on to read Wikipedia. Message for people outside the US. --[[User:Melab-1|Melab±1]] [[User_talk:Melab-1|☎]] 18:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Such a blackout would help raise awareness of the existence and severity of this bill. [[User:Rotorcowboy|Rotorcowboy]] {{su|p=[[User talk:Rotorcowboy|talk]]|b=[[Special:Contributions/Rotorcowboy|contribs]]|fontsize=1.5ex}} 18:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Aethersniper|Aethersniper]] ([[User talk:Aethersniper|talk]]) 18:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:Ifnord|Ifnord]] ([[User talk:Ifnord|talk]]) 18:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This is a US problem and should only concern them. --[[User:Konero26|Konero26]] ([[User talk:Konero26|talk]]) 18:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Tpbradbury|Tom B]] ([[User talk:Tpbradbury|talk]]) 18:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Boldra|Boldra]] ([[User talk:Boldra|talk]]) 18:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' First choice. Some things are worth fighting for. [[User:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|Short Brigade Harvester Boris]] ([[User talk:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|talk]]) 18:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Grotte|Grotte]] ([[User talk:Grotte|talk]]) 18:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', one day site disruption versus potential indefinite legal disruption? Sometimes I don't understand how people weigh cost-benefit at this site. [[User:Blurpeace|'''Blurpeace''']] 18:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Tooga|Tooga]] - [[User talk:Tooga|BØRK!]] 19:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User Talk:Armchair Ace| Armchair Ace]] 19:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', second choice. Prefer blacking out globally since our servers are in the US and everyone needs to learn about this threat to us all. ---[[User:HectorMoffet|HectorMoffet]] ([[User talk:HectorMoffet|talk]]) 19:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. A 24-hour Wikipedia blackout involving USA is awesome. [[User:M'encarta|M'encarta]] ([[User talk:M'encarta|talk]]) 19:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' As one of the originators of the first Black Out the Web Campaign and the Blue Ribbon Campaign for Online Freedom of Expression, I've obviously on board with this one. — '''[[User:SMcCandlish|SMcCandlish]]''' [[User talk:SMcCandlish|Talk⇒]] ʕ(Õلō)ˀ [[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|Contribs]]. 19:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Port(u*o)s|Port(u*o)s]] ([[User talk:Port(u*o)s|talk]]) 19:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - A blackout would send a strong message to policy makers in the US; doing it globally would not help, as the policy makers are only in the US. A global banner would; however, raise awareness across the globe. [[User:ItsZippy|ItsZippy]] ([[User Talk:ItsZippy|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ItsZippy|contributions]]) 19:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - A blackout would send a strong message to policy makers in the US; doing it globally would not help, as the policy makers are only in the US. A global banner would; however, raise awareness across the globe. [[User:ItsZippy|ItsZippy]] ([[User Talk:ItsZippy|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ItsZippy|contributions]]) 19:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - A blackout would help raise awareness to the US about how very inconvenient SOPA would be to Americans, the banner should be there for the rest of the world, to help raise awareness about SOPA, and to try to gain a worldwide bit of support against it, but Non-Americans don't need to be shown the inconvenience of SOPA, as it will not affect them as badly as it will affect Americans.
#'''Support'''- The only reason that SOPA has any support is that people are unaware of the vast damage it could do to the free flow of information on the internet. I hope that by participating in a coordinated blackout wikipedia will draw the necessary attention to this serious issue. [[User:alexchally|alexchally]]
#""Support"" - SOPA is like using an atomic bomb when smart software and tweezers is the rational approach. I'm blacking out my sites for the day on 1/18 [(User:Lauriemann|Lauriemann)]
#'''Support''' - I will be blacking out my 6 domains & would love to see Wikipedia join me. A day-long Wikipedia blackout would help highlight how pervasive and far-reaching SOPA could be if it were passed.
#'''Support'''. This seems like the most reasonable option to me. While non-U.S. users will not have as much influence on SOPA, they should still be made aware of its possible implications. U.S. users, however, must be directed to take action. [[User:Chris the Paleontologist|'''Chris the Paleontologist''']] ([[User talk:Chris the Paleontologist|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Chris the Paleontologist|contribs]]) 20:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Euchrid|Euchrid]] ([[User talk:Euchrid|talk]]) 20:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC) Non user users should know about it, but denying their service does no good.
#'''Support''' - Media coverage of this key issue has been nil. Google and FB might vocally express support, but, as for-profit entities, they'd never risk the financially fallout of a blackout. As a nonprofit with a massive audience, Wiki is in a unique position and should use it to raise awareness. A banner will be ignored, and a global blackout is beyond the scope of necessary action. However, a day without Wiki, while it may not in itself alter minds, will definitely get the attention of its millions of daily users. [[User:VitaleBaby|Mr. Vitale]] ([[User talk:VitaleBaby|talk]]) 20:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. No sense getting the rest of the world involved, but everyone in the U.S. needs to be fully aware of what life without Wikipedia (and other sites) would be like. [[User:Strumphs|Strumphs]] ([[User talk:Strumphs|talk]]) 20:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Seems to be the best option, global blackout seems too severe. [[User:Kurochigama|Kurochigama]] ([[User talk:Kurochigama|talk]]) 20:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Kurochigama}}
#'''Support''' - Strikes the right balance between awareness and inconvenience for non-US users. [[User:Pmj|pmj]] ([[User talk:Pmj|talk]]) 20:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Objix|Objix]] ([[User talk:Objix|talk]]) 20:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. But global blackout is impossible, if only the en:WP will be asked about this problem. [[User:Marcus Cyron|Marcus Cyron]] ([[User talk:Marcus Cyron|talk]]) 20:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Weak support''' of full U.S. blackout. "Weak" because this kind of violates NPOV. :-) --[[User:Ixfd64|Ixfd64]] ([[User talk:Ixfd64|talk]]) 20:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Is a good idea. Greetings from Bogotá, Colombia. [[User:Elberth 00001939|Elberth 00001939]] ([[User talk:Elberth 00001939|talk]]) 20:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Vertigo700|Vertigo700]] ([[User talk:Vertigo700|talk]]) 21:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Bhall87|Bhall87]][[User talk:Bhall87|Four Score]][[Special:Contributions/Bhall87|and Seven]] 21:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I thought about NPOV, but realized that NPOV won't matter if Wikipedia becomes too much of a liability to exist anyway. The way the bill is formulated reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of how the internet works. The repercussions are global. -- '''[[User:Obsidian Soul|Obsidi♠n]] [[User talk:Obsidian Soul|Soul]]''' 21:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The point of the temporary inconvenience is to raise awareness and therefore political participation. Without the blackout there will be no story, so no awareness. Political participation outside the US will be ineffective, so there is no point in creating the inconvenience for them. [[User:lleeoo|lleeoo]] ([[User talk:lleeoo|talk]]
# '''Support'''. [[User:Lklundin|Lklundin]]
#'''Strongly Oppose''', I am from the UK and USA law affects the entire world. This is not simply a US issue. Go global! [[User:Genjix|Genjix]] ([[User talk:Genjix|talk]]) 21:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Hous21|Hous21]] ([[User talk:Hous21|talk]]) 21:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. I think this option would make a strong statement in the United States, but would still allow users in other countries to access Wikipedia. I believe the SOPA issue is important enough to justify the action, as this is an issue that could (and probably would) directly impact the future survival of Wikipedia. [[User:Elmarco|Elmarco]] 21:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Pfhorrest|Pfhorrest]] ([[User talk:Pfhorrest|talk]]) 21:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Evilgidgit|Evilgidgit]] ([[User talk:Evilgidgit|talk]]) 21:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Tabercil|Tabercil]] ([[User talk:Tabercil|talk]]) 22:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:VasilievVV|vvv]][[User talk:VasilievVV|t]] 22:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. You can't be neutral when your very fabric of being is under threat of erasure. [[User:Domiciliphile|Domiciliphile]] ([[User talk:Domiciliphile|talk]]) 22:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. Seems the most reasonable course of action. [[User:Martinevans123|Martinevans123]] ([[User talk:Martinevans123|talk]]) 22:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''; but prefer (2). Preaching to the choir is less effective than the entire assembly. — [[User:Coren|Coren]] [[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]] 22:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC) — (The US isn't the choir in this instance, though, it is the congregation. --[[User:FormerIP|FormerIP]] ([[User talk:FormerIP|talk]]) 22:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC))
#'''Support'''. [[User:Slow Riot|Slow Riot]] ([[User talk:Slow Riot|talk]]) 22:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Although I think others have made a good case for limiting action to an informative banner or click-through nag screen rather than a full blackout, and I would be happy with that action as well. [[User:CristoperB|CristoperB]] ([[User talk:CristoperB|talk]]) 22:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Powergate92|Powergate92]][[User talk:Powergate92|Talk]] 22:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The global community cannot in any way intervene in a US law. However users worldwide should be made aware that a similar fate may follow if the bill is passed in US [[User:Sayan rc|Sayan rc]] ([[User talk:Sayan rc|talk]]) 23:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. '''[[User:MZaplotnik|Matjaž]] [[User talk:MZaplotnik|''Zaplotnik'']]''' [[Special:Contributions/MZaplotnik|(my contributions)]] 23:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. '''[[User:legodt]]'''
#'''Strongly Support'''. The only reason the global option might be more effective is more public outcry and press response. This one is a very good idea as well. -[[User:Wingdude88|The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire]] ([[User talk:Wingdude88|talk]]) 23:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Naturenet|Naturenet]] | [[User talk:Naturenet|Talk]] 23:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''.[User:KaitlynC] As an enterprise built solely behind the notion that knowledge is free, wikipedia must support any action which seeks to degrade this concept. SOPA is an attempt to stifle the rights of U.S. citizens in order to make a profit for competing companies such as RIAA, MPAA, News Corp, TimeWarner, Walmart, Nike, Tiffany, Chanel, Rolex, Sony, Juicy Couture, Ralph Lauren, VISA, Mastercard, Comcast, ABC, etc. {Copied bytheway from (craigslist http://www.craigslist.org/about/SOPA) through the channel of facebook). In no situation is it appropriate to alter the free-trade of the internet's resources. As you asked the public for their contribution to this matter: I strongly support a blackout coinciding with all other particpating domains as this will call much needed attention to an extremely harmful piece of legislation.
#'''Support''' - because if the US endorses internet censorship, other countries' governments may potentially view net censorship as an acceptable means of content and information control. Keep the internet censorship-free. [[User:Baffle gab1978|Baffle gab1978]] ([[User talk:Baffle gab1978|talk]]) 00:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Jxm|jxm]] ([[User talk:Jxm|talk]]) 00:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I'm against a global blackout, there's no need to penalise the rest of the world when the rest of the world rely on Wikipedia. [[User:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|The Cavalry]] ([[User talk:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry|Message me]]) 00:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''STRONGLY Support'''. US blackout, global banner. Let's not punish the whole world for our problems until it gets closer to passing. After that, we might need the rest of the world behind us. This would demonstrate perfectly how disastrous SOPA passing would be.{{spa|65.96.96.226}}
#'''Support'''. [[User:Konczewski|Konczewski]] ([[User talk:Konczewski|talk]]) 00:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:GyroMagician|GyroMagician]] ([[User talk:GyroMagician|talk]]) 00:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''[[User:Henitsirk|Henitsirk]] ([[User talk:Henitsirk|talk]]) 00:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', as other countries shouldn't suffer and locals can do the most about it. If this doesn't help, I support (2) aswell, just to inform the entire world. [[User:H2ppyme|H2ppyme]] ([[User talk:H2ppyme|talk]]) 00:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' it needs to be brought to everyones attention in the us but why mess up the worlds fun [[Special:Contributions/98.210.225.243|98.210.225.243]] ([[User talk:98.210.225.243|talk]]) 00:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|98.210.225.243}}
#'''Support'''. [[User:Sniffnoy|Sniffnoy]] ([[User talk:Sniffnoy|talk]]) 01:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' A blackout has nothing to do with censorship, it's a method of pressure and everyone of them should be used. [[User:p4p5|p4p5]]
#'''Gritted teeth support''' Having some nonsense injunction to exercise power over the US legislature that I don't have is at least better than the other horse in the race.--[[User:Peter cohen|Peter cohen]] ([[User talk:Peter cohen|talk]]) 01:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' The only thing that would be effective is a sustained blackout. People will just be mad for the day its out and go back to their tasks the next day. A week long shutdown would really piss people off to call their congressman or take physical action.--[[User:Metallurgist|Metallurgist]] ([[User talk:Metallurgist|talk]]) 01:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. [[User:Xkumo|Xkumo]] ([[User talk:Xkumo|talk]]) 01:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Xkumo}}
#'''Support'''. [[User:Wizardoz|Wizardoz]] ([[User talk:Wizardoz|talk]]) 01:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Wizardoz}}
#'''Support''' [[User:Quebec99|Quebec99]] ([[User talk:Quebec99|talk]]) 01:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Matanhofree|Matanhofree]] ([[User talk:Matanhofree|talk]]) 02:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Seeing as this is a bill in the ''United States'' Congress, I believe it is appropriate to blackout only in the U.S. Other nations around the world should, however, be alerted of the significance of SOPA's actions on the web and have a proper banner displayed. [[User:Kinaro|'''Kinaro''']][[User talk:Kinaro|(say hello)''']] [[Special:Contributions/Kinaro|(what's been done)]] 02:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' US only, oppose globally. [[User:MER-C|MER-C]] 02:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Kaldari|Kaldari]] ([[User talk:Kaldari|talk]]) 02:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Noleander|Noleander]] ([[User talk:Noleander|talk]]) 02:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' The global community should attempt to influence this US law. Users worldwide should be made aware that a similar fate may follow if the bill is passed in US. [[User:Derek farn|Derek farn]] ([[User talk:Derek farn|talk]]) 02:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. [[Special:Contributions/24.218.166.109|24.218.166.109]] ([[User talk:24.218.166.109|talk]]) 02:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Mtking|Mt]][[User talk:Mtking|king]][[Special:Contributions/Mtking| (edits) ]] 02:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''{{spa|74.72.140.220}}
#'''Support'''--[[User:Oldsmoboi|Oldsmoboi]] ([[User talk:Oldsmoboi|talk]]) 02:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' (1). [[User:Daufer|Daufer]] ([[User talk:Daufer|talk]]) 03:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[Special:Contributions/216.246.179.102|216.246.179.102]] ([[User talk:216.246.179.102|talk]]) 03:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|216.246.179.102}}
#'''Support''' [[User:Moez|Moez]] [[user talk:Moez|''talk'']] 03:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Rsperko|Rsperko]] ([[User talk:Rsperko|talk]]) 03:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Rsperko}}
#'''Support'''! [[user:yrtneg|'''yrtneg''']] ([[User talk:Yrtneg|talk]]) [[Wikipedia:SOPA initiative/Action|STOP SOPA NOW!]]
#'''Support'''. If the blackout is global, it will be viewed as a sign of american arrogance. If the blackout is local as foreigners are informed, they will be more receptive than otherwise. [[User:Timeu|Timeu]] ([[User talk:Timeu|talk]]) 03:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. Wikipedia is a gateway to knowledge. This includes informing people of SOPA who otherwise would not know of it. However it would still allow international browsing as it is meant to for people of no fault of their own. 03:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|160.94.118.51}}
#'''Strongly Support'''. --[[User:Zachary Schr|Absentia]] ([[User talk:Zachary Schr|talk]]) 03:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Qwa127|Qwa127]] ([[User talk:Qwa127|talk]]) 03:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Slw2014|Sententia Noveboracensis]] ([[User talk:Slw2014|talk]]) 04:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - Encouraging people to visit SOPA-related articles would probably be the best chance we have at educating others during the blackout. [[User:Shatteredshards|Shatteredshards]] ([[User talk:Shatteredshards|talk]]) 04:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' People need to know. --[[User:Gar2chan|Gar2chan]] ([[User talk:Gar2chan|talk]]) 04:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:CheShA|CheShA]] ([[User talk:CheShA|talk]]) 04:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User: Thatdudeyouknowfromschool| Thatdudeyouknowfromschool]] ([[User talk: Thatdudeyouknowfromschool|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/ Thatdudeyouknowfromschool|contribs]]) 04:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 
#'''Support''' [[User:squeeorama|squeeorama]] 04:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Clorox|Clorox]] ([[User talk:Clorox|diskussion]]) 04:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:69.242.203.53|69.242.203.53]] ([[User talk:69.242.203.53|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/69.242.203.53|contribs]]) 05:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Kautiontape|Kautiontape]] ([[User talk:Kautiontape|talk]]) 05:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' This legislation affects everybody in the end, so a global banner is warranted, but US citizens are the first directly affected. A local blackout creates the chance to educate the public on proxies and other ways to help route around damage. [[User:ClaesWallin|clacke]] ([[User talk:ClaesWallin|talk]]) 05:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' YES. Wikipedia should definitely be on the anti-SOPA side! — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:HUMANC0DE|HUMANC0DE]] ([[User talk:HUMANC0DE|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/HUMANC0DE|contribs]]) 05:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Full blackout is the best way to draw attention. It should be global because SOPA would affect us all. Full blackout could be followed by a soft blackout. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Emu42|Emu42]] ([[User talk:Emu42|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Emu42|contribs]]) 06:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Will draw more attention. --[[User:Wagaf-d|Wagaf-d]] ([[User talk:Wagaf-d|talk]]) 06:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:LucasBrown|Lucas]] [[User talk:LucasBrown|Brown]] 06:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' SOPA is a threat to the Internet. Although to some it makes no sense to fight censorship with censorship (blackout), I believe the point here is to let the lawmakers know that we are against SOPA. All I'm asking is for us to sacrifice a small thing (being able to view Wikipedia for a day) in order to make way for a greater good. Global censorship on the 18th! —Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/202.84.23.99|202.84.23.99]] ([[User talk:202.84.23.99|talk]]) 06:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Cakedamber|Cakedamber]] ([[User talk:Cakedamber|talk]]) 06:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''.--[[User:Foolishgrunt|Foolishgrunt]] ([[User talk:Foolishgrunt|talk]]) 07:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''[[User:Naŋar|Naŋar]] ([[User talk:Naŋar|talk]]) 07:19, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support.''' It's essential that Americans be made aware of what their lawmakers are doing, and for them to experience inconveniences and frustrations that are at least a shadow of the genuine losses that SOPA/PIPA will create. A banner won't do that; a click-through won't do that. Only a full blackout will. There are too few things that non-Americans can do to affect our political process to make it worthwhile to inconvenience them, however. [[User:JSarek|jSarek]] ([[User talk:JSarek|talk]]) 07:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' But how will people find out about SOPA if wikipedia is down?!--[[User:Frozenport|Frozenport]] ([[User talk:Frozenport|talk]]) 07:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Reply to previous: ...obviously, Wikipedia will explain why there is a blackout. A blackout will make this issue aware to the US public, and it's one of the only ways to ensure that many people know about this issue. Global banner also helps let others know about it and do something as well - even if they are not in the US. - [[User:M0rphzone|M0rphzone]] ([[User talk:M0rphzone|talk]]) 07:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I use Wikipedia every day but SOPA needs to go down [[User:Blckmgc|Blckmgc]] ([[User talk:Blckmgc|talk]]) 07:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' This will show Congress how serious people are if one of the most visited sites goes down. Please go through with this! [[User:Grapeon777|Grapeon777]] ([[User talk:Grapeon777|talk]]) 08:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. It will not just be the US affected by SOPA due to international treaties and time. Thus support global action. [[User:Jmh649|'''Doc James''']] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 08:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Ayacop|Ayacop]] ([[User talk:Ayacop|talk]]) 09:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Neljack|Neljack]] ([[User talk:Neljack|talk]]) 09:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Atlasowa|Atlasowa]] ([[User talk:Atlasowa|talk]]) 10:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Very Strongly Support'''. The entire planet doesn't need to suffer for a US bill. But international users should be encouraged to push for Americans. [[User:Antrikshy|Antrikshy]] ([[User talk:Antrikshy|talk]]) 10:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:zacchiamachine]] 5:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. As much as I hate losing one of my home pages for a day, I'd much rather lose it for a day than for the rest of my life. A global banner will show everyone else what's going on, while the US blackout will show us here in the US what could happen. I'd also agree that the Article of the Day should be [[SOPA]] for at least a day afterward.[[User:ChristopherGregory|ChristopherGregory]] ([[User talk:ChristopherGregory|talk]]) 10:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' International community should not be affected by a blackout aimed at a US bill, but should be kept informed about and encourage to voice out against this Bill.--[[User:Lionratz|Lionratz]] ([[User talk:Lionratz|talk]]) 10:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Cp21yos|Cp21yos]] ([[User talk:Cp21yos|talk]]) 11:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:Hakimio|Hakimio]] ([[User talk:Hakimio|talk]]) 11:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Pouyana|Pouyana]] ([[User talk:Pouyana|talk]]) 11:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''[[User:MADe|MADe]] ([[User talk:MADe|talk]]) 11:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:TheXenomorph1|TheXenomorph1]] ([[User talk:TheXenomorph1|talk]]) 12:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - [[User:Ale_jrb|Ale_Jrb]][[User_talk:Ale_jrb|talk]] 12:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Remi Mathis|Remi Mathis]] ([[User talk:Remi Mathis|talk]]) 12:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Ro_Ro]]16 January 2012 [[User:Burroveo|Burroveo]] ([[User talk:Burroveo|talk]]) 12:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Alan_Isherwood|AlanI]] ([[User talk:Alan_Isherwood|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Alan_Isherwood|contribs]]) 13:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Highly Support'''. -- I definitely think that if we blacked out the United States site, the citizens of the US who use Wikipedia would be able to see it and call their Congressional representatives to voice their concern over SOPA. However, as other people have said, a global blackout may be pointless and will hinder some peoples' legitimate use of the site. Have a banner blackout everywhere, and a full US blackout, and we'll be set. [[User:Mikebruffee|Mikebruffee]] ([[User talk:Mikebruffee|talk]]) 13:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. -- [[User:Cobi|Cobi]]([[User talk:Cobi|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cobi|c]]|[[User:ClueBot Commons/Bots|b]]) 14:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''--[[User:Ponyo|''Jezebel's''Ponyo]][[User_talk:Ponyo|''bons mots'']] 14:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''-- I think this will have the best effect without pissing off those who have no say in US politics. [[User:Ohshazbot|Ohshazbot]] ([[User talk:Ohshazbot|talk]]) 15:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''-- It would have an incredibly significant impact on the american people, thus making it a issue — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/50.10.17.239|50.10.17.239]] ([[User talk:50.10.17.239|talk]]) 15:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 
#'''Support'''. [[User:Aarakast|Aarakast]] ([[User talk:Aarakast|talk]]) 15:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' In Italy a blackout was effective in forcing the government to reconsider a law which would have allowed anyone to force their own POV in a Wikipedia page. I think it's better to treat differently users located in the US because it would give a taste of what SOPA will entail. US users could use proxies to access wikipedia, thus developing useful skills for the day SOPA will be law. --[[User:Lou Crazy|Lou Crazy]] ([[User talk:Lou Crazy|talk]]) —Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 15:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC). 
#'''Support'''. Strongly support and believe that access to the SOPA article (as suggested below) would be a good idea. [[User:Gandydancer|Gandydancer]] ([[User talk:Gandydancer|talk]]) 15:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Ebelular|Ebelular]] ([[User talk:Ebelular|talk]]) 15:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC) There should only be a blackout for USA IPs. (a) This is a USA law that doesn't apply to non-USAians (b) as someone not from the USA there is no-one can lobby or write to to oppose SOPA, and (c) this will show USAians that this law doesn't "harm the internet" per se, but instead will "harm the internet in USA". It will show them that SOPA might make them a 2nd class internet player.
#'''Support'''. Should make the SOPA article available though. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:84.51.182.74|84.51.182.74]] ([[User talk:84.51.182.74|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/84.51.182.74|contribs]]) 15:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. A blackout that only affects the US would be the proper action, SOPA does not really affect the rest of the readers/editors of the English Wikipedia around the world. A banner to inform them about the blackout in the US should do it for the rest.--[[User:GDuwen|'''GD''''''uwen''']][[User talk:GDuwen|'''Tell me!''']] 16:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#Support. --[[User:CatMan61|CatMan61]] ([[User talk:CatMan61|talk]]) 16:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Matthew Steven Kelly|Matthew Steven Kelly]] ([[User talk:Matthew Steven Kelly|talk]]) 16:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. SOPA is being supported by the American Association of Publishers (AAP) who represent publishers of scholarly content (research, including medical). They are also proposing other restrictions (such as H.R.3699 / Research Works Act). While I strongly oppose SOPA on its own, if it passed it would give encouragement to pass other restrictive practices, which would also deny Wikipedia content [[User:Petermr|Petermr]] ([[User talk:Petermr|talk]]) 17:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== (2) Global blackout and banner =====
#'''Support'''. How the SOPA event will unfold in USA will decide the future in many other countries. I belong to India and people here have only started to get familiar with freedom of expression through internet. As soon as US government will pass SOPA, government in countries like ours will have a [http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article2742563.ece justification] to bring a similar law (as much of our policies are derived from the US model). This can prevent internet in becoming a medium of expression for people and instead become another way for our government to promote its oligarchical regime. A global blackout and banner can at least senstize the people in other countries against (possible) threats like SOPA. A worldwide blackout is important to make people realize that it is not another "read and forget" cause they are witnessing. --[[User:Chetanshaw|Chetanshaw]] ([[User talk:Chetanshaw|talk]]) 11:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Passing of SOPA in USA will have repercussions for the rest of the world. The US Government often speaks out against censorship in other countries. It's time they're heard from too. [[User:Questionkiddo|Questionkiddo]] ([[User talk:Questionkiddo|talk]]) 03:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Not only does the [[federal government of the United States|federal government]] have effective jurisdiction over the Wikimedia Foundation and [[ICANN]] (which along with [[Verisign]], located within the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area, controls the "Internet"), the [[government of Florida]] and [[Florida law]] also controls the Wikimedia Foundation, and the [[government of California]] and [[California law]] also controls ICANN (and can do the same things as SOPA.) [[User:Int21h|Int21h]] ([[User talk:Int21h|talk]]) 02:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:xmike87|xmike87]]([[User talk:xmike87|talk]]) 4:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:Eingangskontrolle|Eingangskontrolle]] ([[User talk:Eingangskontrolle|talk]]) 08:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. ditto Agvulpine. [[User:alex3yoyo|alex3yoyo]] ([[User talk:alex3yoyo|talk]]) 23:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Supportly Strong''', SOPA/PIPA doesn't just affect Americans, it affects the '''World'''. (Edit: As per what is suggested by others comments below, I want to clarify that I do mean Global Blackout w/o ability to view or edit articles. I'm told there's some confusion to this, now. I'm voting Against option 1 by voting For option 2: Full Site Lockdown.) ~ [[User:Agvulpine|Agvulpine]] ([[User talk:Agvulpine|talk]]) 21:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''', I am from the UK and USA law affects the entire world. This is not simply a US issue. [[User:Genjix|Genjix]] ([[User talk:Genjix|talk]]) 21:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Codysnider|Cody Snider]] Black it all out, send the message that government and corporate censorship is unacceptable. 21:14:48, 15 January, 2012, (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' If done, this just might be the most newsworthy internet event in history. Wikipedia has already changed the world, and this will only help show how much influence the encyclopedia truly has! — [[User:FoxCE|FoxCE]] ([[User talk:FoxCE|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/FoxCE|contribs]]) 15:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Doing nothing accomplishes nothing; stand up for the internet. [[User:SLWatson|SLWatson]] ([[User talk:SLWatson|talk]]) 18:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', although [[SOPA]] is technically for the American user, let's not forget that most of the websites are hosted in the US and that they're under the jurisdiction of the US gov't. SOPA affects everyone globally even those not living in America. We need global support from around the world. --[[User:AbderrahmanNajjar|Abderrahman]] ([[User talk:AbderrahmanNajjar|talk]]) 15:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', I support a global blackout. SOPA will destroy our freedom, our internet, out digital frontier. Let our words be heard by the world through global blackout. [[User:comepradz|CoMePrAdZ]] 10:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', I support a universal blackout. Just like the internet, SOPA will affect users across the world. [[User:Robin WikiTryHardDieHard|WikiTryHardDieHard]] ([[User talk:WikiTryHardDieHard|talk]]) 00:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - I prefer a complete total global blackout. This is an issue that is focused on the United States right now but other countries around the world are considering similar measures. A global blackout would mean raising awareness so we don't reach this tipping point in the future. --[[User:Jasenlee|Jasenlee]] ([[User talk:Jasenlee|talk]]) 21:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' either (1) or (2), prefer global as well. [[User: Radiomantx]] 05:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC
# '''Support''' either (1) or (2), but ''prefer'' global. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 17:57, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# Like Stephan, I believe this affects all our readers, and that all our readers have the ability to make their voice heard to US lawmakers. So let's reach out to them all. I would however accept (1) or (3) as a compromise. [[User:Dcoetzee|Dcoetzee]] 19:02, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' Also opposed to a click-through workaround. It's a one-day stand against awful legislation. People shouldn't be able to work around it. --[[User:Straightbstudent|Straightbstudent]] ([[User talk:StraightBStudent|talk]]) 21:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. (worldwide blackout) Passing of SOPA in USA will have repercussions for the rest of the world. SOPA is not just an American issue anymore. Everyone has to be informed and involved. [[User:Spyvsspycomputers]] 23:54, 15 January 2012 (UTCsup>[[Special:Contributions/Mtking|){{spa|Spyvsspycomputers}}
# Per Dcoetzee, I would prefer a global blackout. However, (1) would be acceptable as a step down from that.--[[User:Ragesoss|Ragesoss]] ([[User talk:Ragesoss|talk]]) 19:05, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Also support (1) and (3). [[User:Maplebed|Maplebed]] ([[User talk:Maplebed|talk]]) 19:59, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' 2,1,3 - [[User:David Gerard|David Gerard]] ([[User talk:David Gerard|talk]]) 20:26, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' as first choice, with (1) as second choice. [[User:First Light|First Light]] ([[User talk:First Light|talk]]) 20:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' per Dcoetzee. --[[User:Vituzzu|Vituzzu]] ([[User talk:Vituzzu|talk]]) 21:13, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Given the fact SOPA gives the US authority to take down foreign sites, as well as the de facto lead the US has in the creation of internet phenomenons from Wikipedia to youtube, this is truly a global concern.[[User:TheMadcapSyd|TheMadcapSyd]] ([[User talk:TheMadcapSyd|talk]]) 21:39, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Without any public display of the SOPA bill, most users will be left clueless as to what is going on. A partial-blackout is a good-idea, limiting certain features, or at least making it clear that SOPA could completely destroy this website that they love. Also, please make your SOPA banner distinct from the fund-raising banners so that users don't dismiss it thinking that they've seen and read it before. Thanks, happy anti-SOPA! --[[User:Jean Of mArc|Jean Of mArc]] 15:46, 13 January 2012{{spa|Jean Of mArc}}
# '''Support''' either (1) or (2), but ''prefer'' global. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 21:59, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''.—[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky)]] • ([[User talk:Ezhiki|yo?]]); January 13, 2012; 22:02 (UTC)
#'''Support''' This bill has very broad global consequences, so a global blackout seems most appropriate. [[User:Kcook969|Kcook969]] January 13, 2012; 22:10 (UTC){{spa|Kcook969}}
#'''Support''' This would be my preferred action, as SOPA effects everybody, not just Americans. If all we can get is support for a US blackout, then so be it, but I think a worldwide blackout would be much more powerful.--[[User:DfizzleShizzle|DfizzleShizzle]] ([[User talk:DfizzleShizzle|talk]]) 22:11, 13 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|DfizzleShizzle}}
#'''Support''' SOPA can and likely will destroy Wikipedia. We must take a stand against it as a whole community. While I would also find (1) agreeable, unless we have a way to hide the infringing websites from US users, this will affect all of us. If we stand united as one, our collective voice will rise stronger than any smaller group of editors. In this issue, it is prudent to [[WP:IAR|ignore]] [[WP:SOAP]] because the effects of this bill could be as disatrous to Wikipedia as [[WP:DDMP|deleting the Main Page]]. [[User:Hamtechperson|Ham]][[User talk:Hamtechperson|tech]][[Special:Contributions/Hamtechperson|person]] 23:19, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' 2,1,3. The WMF projects are under threat, and it is our responsibility to inform people of that fact. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 23:23, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' SOPA affects the entire planet, so the blackout (click though is better) must be global --[[User:Jon889|Jon889]] ([[User talk:Jon889|talk]]) 23:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Jon889}}
# '''Support''' biggest blackout possible.--[[User:GrapedApe|GrapedApe]] ([[User talk:GrapedApe|talk]]) 00:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' SOPA is an Internet issue and is a worldwide issue. Blackout everything. [[User:Drivec|Drivec]] ([[User talk:Drivec|talk]]) 00:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' either (1) or (2), but ''prefer'' global. [[User:Seb az86556|Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556]] [[User_talk:Seb_az86556|> haneʼ]] 00:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' SOPA is a global issue. It effects not just US web sites, but it also enacts US courts to take down foreign web sites and try them under US jurisdiction. Even if it were only US sites, people worldwide make use of them. Worse, if the US is successful in pulling this off it could spread to other nations as part of "copyright harmonization". My second choice would be 1 then 3. --[[User:Schwern|Schwern]] ([[User talk:Schwern|talk]]) 00:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', worldwide issue. - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 00:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. While the outcome of SOPA hinges upon the actions of U.S.-based politicians and their constituents, the potential ramifications of the bill are global. Best to inform all users of it. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch|talk]]) 00:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', [[User:Ziko|Ziko]] ([[User talk:Ziko|talk]]) 00:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', other people from other countries should also be inspired to prevent this sort of legislation in their own countries in the future.[[User:Sopher99|Sopher99]] ([[User talk:Sopher99|talk]]) 01:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', Wikipedia has a huge voice, and many people visit this website daily. In fact about 4 million a day. We should inform everyone on this. --[[User:Xxhopingtearsxx|Xxhopingtearsxx]] ([[User talk:Xxhopingtearsxx|talk]]) 01:01, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. The bill endangers the foundation of the internet, for information to be freely available for all. The US government would be impeding the spread of knowledge for the whole world, and thus it is a worldwide issue. [[User:Jed 20012|Captain Gamma]] ([[User talk:Jed 20012|talk]]) 01:02, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', I would also support (1) [[User:Csquest99|Csquest99]] ([[User talk:Csquest99|talk]]) 01:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. While SOPA might be originating in the US, its consequences will reach far beyond our borders. Banners are ignored. The real consequences of this action need to felt to be understood. I'd prefer it not be a click through, but actually block the site. [[User:Mahewa|&Dagger; MAHEWA &Dagger;]] • [[User talk:Mahewa|talk]] 01:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', The world is much more than the United States, but so much of what happens in the U.S. can affect globally; this is one of those times. (1) would be acceptable, but (2) is preferable. [[User:Benscripps|Benscripps]] ([[User talk:Benscripps|talk]]) 01:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', with (1) being my second choice. Reasons: (a) SOPA affects sites and readers all over the world; (b) similar legislation has been proposed and enacted in other countries; (c) international treaties may in the future require similar legislation everywhere; (d) therefore maximal pressure must be exerted on all governments of the world. [[User:AxelBoldt|AxelBoldt]] ([[User talk:AxelBoldt|talk]]) 01:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support,''' we want as many voices in this as possible. [[User:DavidSSabb|DavidSSabb]] ([[User talk:DavidSSabb|talk]]) 01:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' either global or US specific actions [[User:Varnent|Varnent]] ([[User talk:Varnent|talk]]) 01:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' SOPA merely begins in the U.S. but will affect the rest of the world. A true blackout, one that cannot be clicked through, is the best way of doing this. say anybob 01:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC) [[User:anybob|anybob]] ([[User talk:anybob|talk]]) 8:19, 13 January 2012 (EST)
# '''Support''', I support a global blackout. thanks [[User:Robin klein|Robin klein]] ([[User talk:Robin klein|talk]]) 01:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - SOPA affects the whole world. --'''[[User:Jeffwang|J]] [[User_talk:Jeffwang|(t)]]''' 01:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' SOPA, and policies like it wherever they are instituted impact the whole world. The US often criticizes other countries for their Internet policy, time for the favor to be returned. --[[User:Gmaxwell|Gmaxwell]] ([[User talk:Gmaxwell|talk]]) 01:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support the largest blackout possible. No one should be able to access Wikipedia for the entire day of 18 January. This shows what every day would be like with SOPA- no Wikipedia at all. [[User:Fendue|Fendue]] ([[User talk:Fendue|talk]]) 01:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Bcartolo|bcartolo]] ([[User talk:Bcartolo|talk]]) 01:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', I support a GLOBAL CLICK THROUGH and banner. How long will this go on? Just 24 hours or is this a week long protest? Or a month long?[[User:Electricmic|Electricmic]] ([[User talk:Electricmic|talk]]) 01:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' This bill has very broad global consequences, so go big. I will add that I think an actual blackout would be better than the "blackout" with clickthrough that is planned.
#'''Support''' [[User:Bouncingnewsgreen|Bouncingnewsgreen]] ([[User talk:Bouncingnewsgreen|talk]]) 02:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' It is important to inform as many people globally as possible about this so that they can show what they think about this type of legislation before the politicians get inspired to follow suite... But it would be good if ''established users'' still had a chance to work on the backlog. [[User:Jopparn|Jopparn]] ([[User talk:Jopparn|talk]]) 02:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Far too few people know about the possibility of internet censorship. [[User:Chillllls|Chillllls]] ([[User talk:Chillllls|talk]]) 02:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Others have stated my sentiments exactly: this bill could have worldwide consequences. Best to inform everyone, and foreign pressure could help pressure Congress to not pass it. [[User:Lordvader99|Lordvader99]] ([[User talk:Lordvader99|talk]]) 02:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' agree with specific comments of AxelBoldt above. Particularly intellectual monopoly creep via supposed treaty obligations is a real concern. [[User:Huckfinne|Huckfinne]] ([[User talk:Huckfinne|talk]]) 02:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' as we are based in the USA this really effects the whole world and we should make as much noise as possible![[User:Luciferwildcat|LuciferWildCat]] ([[User talk:Luciferwildcat|talk]]) 02:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' global splash screen, although #1 (US only) is okay as well. While the content would have to be different (non-US visitors don't have representatives/senators to contact), the nature of the Internet makes this inherently a global issue. --[[User:Tim Parenti|Tim Parenti]] ([[User talk:Tim Parenti|talk]]) 02:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' for options (1) or (2) -- I personally prefer global as this legislation would have long-lasting effects on how services like Wikipedia can continue on as they presently exist. --[[User:Hyper Anthony|Hyper Anthony]] ([[User talk:Hyper Anthony|talk]]) 02:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' for a global blackout. [[User:Usb10|Usb10]] [[User talk:Usb10|plug me in]] 02:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# <s>'''Strong Support''' Allow Wikipedia to have a wide and strong impact as a protest against SOPA. Any Protest against this removal of freedom should not be lightly.</s> I have reinstated my support for a full world blackout below --[[User:Camilo Sanchez|Camilo Sanchez]] ([[User talk:Camilo Sanchez|talk]]) 02:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' We need to make an effective stand on this, and there is no better way than showing the world what they are at risk of losing. [[User:Ktr101|Kevin Rutherford]] ([[User_talk:Ktr101|talk]]) 02:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Take a stand now or cry later. [[User:Gregbard|Greg Bard]] ([[User_talk:Gregbard|talk]]) 02:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' This will send a message that we don't want anyone fucking with us, no matter what government. [[User:The Blade of the Northern Lights|The Blade of the Northern Lights]] ([[User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights|話して下さい]]) 02:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' If any community blacks out their part of Wikimedia, I'd want to see at least a banner on my part [[User:KevinCuddeback|KevinCuddeback]] ([[User talk:KevinCuddeback|talk]]) 02:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#~[[User:Crazytales|Crazytales]] [[User talk:Crazytales|(talk)]] 03:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' SOPA affects the entire world, so everyone should know about it. [[User:Focus|Focus]] ([[User talk:Focus|talk]]) 03:02, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' as first choice. SOPA's impact would not be limited to the US. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] [[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]] 03:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I agree that SOPA's impact would not be limited to just the US. The creator of [[Minecraft]] put forth his feelings on notch.tumblr.com. Yes, let the world know where we stand and the real consequences for SOPA. [[User:Jessemv|Jessemv]] ([[User talk:Jessemv|talk]]) 03:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' SOPA would affect more than just the US. Whether it's this or Option 1, Wikipedia should definitely do some form of blackout, as this bill would severely endanger the site. In other words, this issue is important enough to be worth the site taking a stand on.[[User:Yuuko41|Yuuko41]] ([[User talk:Yuuko41|talk]]) 04:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' By far the most effective option, considering this issue affects all Wikipedia users around the world, not just those in the US. Having both the blackout and banner will show citizens and members of Congress that we are very serious about fighting this bill, and we will do anything to accomplish our goal. [[User:Alexroller|Alexroller]] ([[User talk:Alexroller|talk]]) 04:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Carlsmith|Carlsmith]] ([[User talk:Carlsmith|talk]]) 04:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Bring out the big guns... oh, sorry, forgot about the NDAA. "Bring out the basket of happy puppies"! [[User:Tevildoii|Tevildoii]] ([[User talk:Tevildoii|talk]]) 04:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I support (1) or (2) but prefer (2) [[User:Steevithak|Steevithak]] ([[User talk:Steevithak|talk]]) 05:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Complete blackout, but suggest that perhaps some of the bots still be allowed to run in the background. --[[User:Kumioko|Kumioko]] ([[User talk:Kumioko|talk]]) 05:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Full blackout world wide. Other countries can exert economic and political pressure on the US even if they don't have legal voting power. This is a serious issue.[[User:Canticle|Canticle]] ([[User talk:Canticle|talk]]) 05:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#And please note that I am British and based in Britain. American law is America's business, but law that affects Wikipedia worldwide is an issue of worldwide interest. —[[User talk:WFCforLife|WFC]]— 05:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Just because the blackout would only affect US users shouldn't deter WP from drawing support from outside the US. There's always the possibility that similar laws could be introduced elsewhere. [[User:ThreePointOneFour|3.14]] ([[User talk:ThreePointOneFour|talk]]) 05:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Worldwide blackout ''and'' banner. Non-U.S. users have friends who are U.S. voters, whom they can influence. Banner for persistence of information in the reader's working memory, because the vast majority of users automatically dismiss anything that looks like a pop-up without registering the contents -- [[User:Dandv|Dandv]]([[User talk:Dandv|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Dandv|contribs]]) 05:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This is an issue that ultimately affects everyone, not just the US. If a site as big as Wikipedia institutes a blackout for all its users, people are SURE to take notice, and word will spread that much more quickly. -- [[User:Cyberlink420|Cyberlink420]] ([[User talk:Cyberlink420|talk]]) 06:02, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' both banner and blackout worldwide. If SOPA passes, there is a very real threat that Wikipedia will cease to exist as we know it. '''[[User:Falcon8765|Falcon8765]]''' [[User talk:Falcon8765|(TALK)]] 06:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' '''[[User:UpstateNYer|upstate]][[User talk:UpstateNYer|NYer]]''' 06:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Snackshack100|Snackshack100]] ([[User talk:Snackshack100|talk]]) 06:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC) SOPA MUST BE STOPPED!!!
#'''Support'''. It should be a full blackout. [[User:Jdm64|Jdm64]] ([[User talk:Jdm64|talk]]) 06:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Tgeairn|Tgeairn]] ([[User talk:Tgeairn|talk]]) 06:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Keraunos|Keraunos]] ([[User talk:Keraunos|talk]]) 06:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' either (1) or (2), prefer global as well. [[User:Brandorr|Brandorr]] ([[User talk:Brandorr|talk]]) 07:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Pretendo|Pretendo]] ([[User talk:Pretendo|talk]]) 07:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC) The ratification of SOPA would set a precedence for other countries to model. Toxic legislation in the US tends to have an unfortunate ''trickle down'' effect for the rest of the world.
#'''Support'''. This blacklist legislation threatens to affect not just the U.S., but all Internet users who use services hosted in the U.S. (which is probably a large majority of Internet users) -- [[User:A.M.|A.M.]] ([[User talk:A.M.|talk]]) 08:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --'''''[[User_talk:Rami R|Rami]] [[User:Rami R|R]]''''' 08:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Serve a truly helpful, informative page enabling people to take action if they want. They'll have enough extra time with no Wikipedia articles to read. -- [[User:Honestrosewater|Honestrosewater]] ([[User talk:Honestrosewater|talk]]) 08:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This blacklist legislation threatens not only the U.S. but the whole world. Also, once this bill is passed the U.S. Government will for sure bully other countries to implement similar bills. That is already [http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2012/jan/05/us-pressured-spain-online-piracy happening] now before SOPA has even been made into law. [[User:XKthulhu|XKthulhu]] ([[User talk:XKthulhu|talk]]) 09:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:GroupT|~GT~]] ([[User talk:GroupT|talk]]) 10:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''<s>Support</s>''' highest exposure. Edit: Actually prefer the soft blackout. Updating. [[User:Clegs|Clegs]] ([[User talk:Clegs|talk]]) 10:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Let it be the talk of the whole world. Most SOPA supporters are big international companies, and it's much more effective if they feel the pressure all around the globe. -- [[User:Orionist|'''Orionist''']] ★ [[User talk:Orionist|talk]] 11:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - SOPA will affect everyone, so the blackout should be global. [[User:CT Cooper|CT Cooper]] · [[User talk:CT Cooper|talk]] 12:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - SOPA will have an effect on everyone and every single user of the internet. It must be stopped. [[User:ZergMark|ZergMark]] ([[User talk:ZergMark|talk]]) 12:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - The passing of SOPA will have global repercussions; a global blackout would help to raise full awareness. ~ [[User:Bioran23|'''BIORAN23''']] - [[User talk:Bioran23|'''Talk''']]
# '''Support''' as first choice, with (1) as second choice. --Ben Best 14:18, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' -- Get worldwide attention on it. SOPA/PIPA aren't just a risk in the United States; similar bills are being passed at the United States' urging in other countries. Help raise awareness everywhere and get pressure put on this kind of legislation everywhere. --[[User:Cyde|'''Cyde Weys''']] 14:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' (1 as second choice, which is better than nothing), as what happens in the U.S. could spread like a cancer worldwide, and thus the entire world needs to understand the consequences. Also consider what expatriots can contribute to this. Last, consider how American corporate power reaches globally -- citizens of other countries, even if they can't properly contact our representatives/Senators, can vote with their money. [[User:Stevietheman|'''Stevie is the man!''']] [[User talk:Stevietheman|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Stevietheman|Work]] 14:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Object''' to voters being asked to not oppose some options while other options have oppose sections. This makes interpreting the results a matter of comparing apples and oranges. '''Object''' to misleading title; it is called "''Blackout and banner for all users''" but the description text makes it clear that it isn't a blackout at all. I oppose this option on the grounds that a clicktrough banner without an actual blackout will be perceived as not joining the other sites that have actual blackouts. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 14:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' this, in slight preference to (1). Full blackout would be even better. [[User:Hans Adler|Hans]] [[User talk:Hans Adler|Adler]] 14:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' either (1) or (2), prefer global as well.
# '''Support'''. US legislation has a way of creeping itself into other countries by economic pressure etc. So, don't expect SOPA-style legislation to remain confined to the US for long once adopted. [[User:ASCIIn2Bme|ASCIIn2Bme]] ([[User talk:ASCIIn2Bme|talk]]) 15:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' from Germany --[[User:Oliver Tölkes|Oliver Tölkes]] ([[User talk:Oliver Tölkes|talk]]) 15:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I'm in the United Kingdom - this is a global issue [[User:Tompagenet|tompagenet]] ([[User talk:Tompagenet|talk]]) 16:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' (1) or (2), but this is a global issue, so I prefer this option. [[User:Alpha Quadrant|'''''Alpha_Quadrant''''']] [[User talk:Alpha Quadrant|''(talk)'']] 16:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' SOPA threatens us all, US or not. [[User:Jakew|Jakew]] ([[User talk:Jakew|talk]]) 16:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Ask not for whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee. [[User:JakeInJoisey|JakeInJoisey]] ([[User talk:JakeInJoisey|talk]]) 16:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' Something similar should be done for the Spanish Wikipedia, as there is a sizable Spanish speaking population in the US that is also politically active. Separately, as a previous poster notes, this "US only" Legislation has a way of creeping into other countries. As I recall, there are banking regulations by the [[IRS]] that other countries must comply with or face consequences, all because they have US citizens as customers. [[User:Hires an editor|Hires an editor]] ([[User talk:Hires an editor|talk]]) 16:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. SOPA affects all. [[User:Renwique|Renwique]] ([[User talk:Renwique|talk]]) 16:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Hanna Barberian|Hanna Barberian]] ([[User talk:Hanna Barberian|talk]]) 17:01, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Kavi96|Kavi96]] ([[User talk:Kavi96|talk]]) 17:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC) As a Brit, this bill will affect every country, so we need to take global action. Everybody can do something, even if US citizens will have more impact.
#'''Support''' either (1) or (2) but strongly prefer global. This bill has very broad global consequences, so a global blackout seems most appropriate. --[[User:Orangemike|Orange Mike]] | [[User talk:Orangemike|Talk]] 17:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Aude|Aude]] ([[User talk:Aude|talk]]) 17:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' (1) or (2), prefer 2. ([[Special:Contributions/Ennen|e]] • [[User:Ennen|nn]] • [[User_talk:Ennen|en!]]) 17:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I'm in the UK, and this will affect us as well. Wikipedia has the power to raise world wide awareness for this issue. I would shut down all languages, but I doubt that will happen. [[User:Skeletonboy|Skeletonboy]] ([[User talk:Skeletonboy|talk]]) 17:44, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Very Strong Support''' The issue is global, so this is the right balance of agitprop to reach, not just the American expatriates, but Netziens at large, some of whom have standing with our legislature as well as their own, and some of whom shall begin such involvement [[User:Kencf0618|kencf0618]] ([[User talk:Kencf0618|talk]]) 17:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Like it or not, the world has to deal with whatever is going on in the U.S., in more ways than just SOPA. --[[User:Fang Aili|Fang Aili]] [[User talk:Fang Aili|talk]] 17:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- the whole world needs to know what's going on here, not just the US. SOPA will cause ripple effects and legal repercussions all over the world. [[Special:Contributions/24.228.164.210|24.228.164.210]] ([[User talk:24.228.164.210|talk]]) 18:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#:::Bleh, above was me, forgot to sign in. [[User:Macoukji|Macoukji]] ([[User talk:Macoukji|talk]]) 18:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' geo-location is evil, regions and countries don't exist on the internet, there is only one internet. Blackouts and banners should not try to discriminate between users based on their national origin. SOPA is a global issue that threatens the worldwide internet and would affect everyone. --[[User:Memset|memset]] ([[User talk:Memset|talk]]) 18:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Buggie111|Buggie111]] ([[User talk:Buggie111|talk]]) 18:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' We are all directly or indirectly impacted by SOPA [[User:Kelson|Kelson]] ([[User talk:Kelson|talk]]) 19:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - if it affects Wikipedia (and other Wikimedia projects), it affects all users equally, no matter where they're from. [[User:Schneelocke|Schneelocke]] ([[User talk:Schneelocke|talk]]) 19:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - [[User:Jonathunder|Jonathunder]] ([[User talk:Jonathunder|talk]]) 19:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' Good for raising awareness worldwide '''-[[User:Download|down]][[User talk:Download|load]] ׀ [[User talk:Download|talk]]''' 20:02, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:Grey Wanderer|Grey Wanderer]] ([[User talk:Grey Wanderer|talk]]) 20:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', with (1) as an acceptable second choice. As much as I hesitate to support limiting access to a free encyclopedia, I am convinced by Geoff Bingham's legal analysis that we are justified in taking this action. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 20:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', but not as currently written. Strongly support a blackout screen that is NPOV, e.g., "SOPA could affect Wikipedia. Click to read analysis..." Since this would be purely educational, it is appropriate for non-USA users, too. [[User:Peter Chastain|Peter Chastain]] ([[User talk:Peter Chastain|talk]]) 20:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' since US legislation will have an influence to everybody worldwide. Many users from all over the world use content that is hosted or even routed through the US. We see people that are not breaching local laws even being deported for trial in the US (like Richard O'Dwyer). We cannot allow the US to shape the world even further to what they want. They're not 'God'! Users from all over the world must be made aware that they will be effected by SOPA. [[User:Jurjenb|Jurjenb]] ([[User talk:Jurjenb|talk]]) 21:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' This seems to be the best answer, since SOPA would effect everyone in the world, not just Americans or English language users. (1) would be OK, but everyone needs to know what may/will happen if SOPA or PIPA pass. [[User:TEG24601|TEG]] ([[User talk:TEG24601|talk]]) 21:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' As if people outside the US are not going to be affected... protest should be as big as possible. [[User:Von Restorff|Von Restorff]] ([[User talk:Von Restorff|talk]]) 21:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Liberaler Humanist|Liberaler Humanist]] ([[User talk:Liberaler Humanist|talk]]) 20:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' This will garner more international press this way, and it's important to have other countries aware & equally outraged. -[[User:SColombo|SColombo]] ([[User talk:SColombo|talk]]) 22:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC) (American)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Wikinade|Wikinade]] ([[User talk:Wikinade|talk]]) 22:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' Even though SOPA is a US act, it would affect the entire world wide web. [[User:Estemshorn|eSTeMSHORN]] ([[User_Talk:Estemshorn|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Estemshorn|C]]) 22:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' The U.S. government is more likely to listen if the entire world is angry at them, rather than just Americans. [[User:Merlinsorca|Merlin]][[Special:Contributions/Merlinsorca|'''s''']][[User talk:Merlinsorca|orca]] 22:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' Even though SOPA is a US act, it would affect the entire world wide web. We also should protest the NDAA of Fiscal Year 2011, which authorizes the ability for the US President to abduct, indefinitely detain, torture and kill any one at any time in any part of the world, including US citizens captured in the U.S., without any requirement to show evidence of any kind. When the SOPA act is protested with a banner, protest in graphic format the NDAA legalization of indefinite detention!!
# '''Support'''. [[User talk:Mabdul|mabdul]] 23:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. SOPA crap is contagious, we need to warn everybody. -- [[User:Wesha|Wesha]] ([[User talk:Wesha|talk]]) 23:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Marktaff|Marktaff]] ([[User talk:Marktaff|talk]]) 23:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. -[[User:SusanLesch|SusanLesch]] ([[User talk:SusanLesch|talk]]) 00:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Though SOPA is US legislation, the effects can be felt across the web; hence I support making this a global issue. [[User:Angrytoast|- angrytoast]] ([[User talk:Angrytoast|talk]]) 00:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. This legislation would come to affect the whole world. [[User:Nonky|nonky]] ([[User talk:Nonky|talk]]) 01:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Definitely a global issue. I can only think of [https://torrentfreak.com/dutch-isps-ordered-to-block-the-pirate-bay-120111/ Holland] and [http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-57353142-501465/sopa-like-law-passes-in-spain-u.s-allegedly-involved/ Spain] off the top of my head, but US activity has definitely been influencing other countries to institute SOPA-like restrictions on the internet. [[User:Musicguyguy|music]][[User_talk:Musicguyguy|GUY]] [[Special:Contributions/Musicguyguy|GUY]] 01:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. This will make a larger statement in the media than (1). [[User:Asmeurer|asmeurer]] ([[User talk:Asmeurer|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Asmeurer|contribs]]) 02:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' -- It is important to let as many people as possible about this. [[User:Mchcopl|Mchcopl]] ([[User talk:Mchcopl|talk]]) 02:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)!
# '''Support''', I think the English-speaking world can live without Wikipedia for a few days in exchange for net neutrality. [[User:Axem Titanium|Axem Titanium]] ([[User talk:Axem Titanium|talk]]) 02:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Lonewolf9196|Lonewolf9196]] ([[User talk:Lonewolf9196|talk]]) 03:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Kirkesque|Kirkesque]] ([[User talk:Kirkesque|talk]]) 03:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' -- prefer #1, but this is fine as well. [[User:Qwyrxian|Qwyrxian]] ([[User talk:Qwyrxian|talk]]) 03:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Chimino|Chimino]] ([[User talk:Chimino|talk]]) 03:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', Although I don't think I can articulate my opinion any better than all the people above me have, but I am more than willing to give up my precious wiki for a day or two so that we can at the very least, spread the message around the world about what dangers a free and open internet is up against. [[User:Nsmith4658|スミスナサニアル]] ([[User talk:Nsmith4658|talk]]) 04:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' For the sake of worldwide awareness as big media corporations use their puppets in the committee to try and destroy the internet as we know it, a worldwide blackout must take place. '''[[User:Vodello|Agent Vodello]]'''[[User Talk:Vodello|OK, Let's Party, Darling!]] 05:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - This bill will affect users of Wikipedia around the world; implementing everything for everyone would have the greatest impact. ~~ [[User:Hi878|Hi878]] [[User talk:Hi878|(''Come shout at me!'')]] 06:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support.''' -- It will pretty much spell out trouble for everyone who has an internet connection and aspire to create content for the web, so if it means that everyone must be informed of impending doom to the saftey and structure of the core of the internet, regardless of location, then so be it. [[User:Whisternefet|Whisternefet]] ([[User talk:Whisternefet|talk]]) 06:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. It's unfortunately a global issue, but I'm not opposed to (1) either. [[User:OttoMäkelä|OttoMäkelä]] ([[User talk:OttoMäkelä|talk]]) 06:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Air55|Air55]] ([[User talk:Air55|talk]]) 07:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. It will affect the whole world, and similar measures are being proposed in other countries. [[User:InverseHypercube|InverseHypercube]] 07:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:Asdf01|Asdf01]] ([[User talk:Asdf01|talk]]) 07:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The problem is, SOPA will almost certainly affect people living outside of the United States. [[User:Abedwayyad|Abedwayyad]] ([[User talk:Abedwayyad|talk]]) 07:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' David Garner
#'''Support'''. SOPA reflects on what we will see in the rest of the world tomorrow, [[User:SyDoX|SyDoX]] Tom Ryan Fredriksen | 08:24, 15 January 2012, Norway
#'''Support'''. [[User:Mbza|Mbza]] ([[User talk:Mbza|talk]]) 07:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I also feel that the blackout should be total, not clickthrough. The world won't stop just because people can't get to Wikipedia content for a day ...though that runs counter to the message we wish to convey. So on second thought, the clickthrough may be a good idea. -- [[User:SidShakal|SidShakal]] ([[User talk:SidShakal|talk]]) 07:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''-- I support ''all'' options for a high-profile public statement against SOPA, although I understand the concerns of those editors who oppose the protest. I believe that this threat goes to the core of Wikipedia's mission, and that opposition to Wikipedia becoming a general political advocate ought not to prevent opposition to particular measures that might make it impossible for Wikipedia to exist in its current form. [[User:Cullen328|'''Cullen'''328]] [[User talk:Cullen328|''Let's discuss it'']] 07:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Full blackout [[User:Clockbox|Clockbox]] ([[User talk:Clockbox|talk]]) 07:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Full blackout --[[User:Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy|'''minhhuy''']] ([[User talk:Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy|talk]]) ([[wmf:User:Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy|'''WMF''']]) 07:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Full blackout and banner should work. We should use those things to get people's attention to stop SOPA and PIPA bills now. [[User:BattleshipMan|BattleshipMan]] ([[User talk:BattleshipMan|talk]]) 07:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' for global blackout with banner, on the same grounds as others have given above. Further comment: SOPA is an existential threat to Wikipedia, so WP:NOSOAPBOX is not applicable as the action is not for the purpose of promoting a point of view, but is rather for the purpose of maintaining Wikipedia. It is a system-administrative action, not an editorial action. Even if it were contrary to that policy, the policy should be abridged in this case as it does not make sense to hold to a policy which leads to calamity. Policies are there to improve the encyclopedia; when they do the opposite, they are bad policies worthy of correction.--[[User:Atethnekos|Atethnekos]] ([[User talk:Atethnekos|Discussion]], [[Special:Contributions/Atethnekos|Contributions]]) 07:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - We are all a team here at Wikipedia. -- [[User_talk:MelbourneStar|MST]]☆[[User:MelbourneStar|R]] [[User_talk:MelbourneStar|(Chat Me!)]] 07:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Full blackout [[User:Ysth|Ysth]] ([[User talk:Ysth|talk]]) 07:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Marianian|'''Marianian''']]([[User_talk:Marianian|talk]]) 07:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Iokerapid|Iokerapid]] ([[User talk:Iokerapid|talk]]) 07:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC) SOPA will affect more than just the USA if it goes through.
#'''Very Strong support''' We need to get the message out there about SOPA/Protect-IP. I recommend pointing out how a US ambassador bullied Spain into passing it's own SOPA-like law at the start of the month. If SOPA/PIPA passes here in the US, many other countries will follow suit. Raising major awareness with these blackouts will spell instant death for these bills, which are already on the ropes as is. NamelessFool
#'''Support'''. [[User:Regadollc|Regadollc]] ([[User talk:Regadollc|talk]]) 08:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC) This will eventually effect the globe. Black them out, All of them....
#'''Support'''. I'm quite sure this have global effect by effectively breaking the consistency of the DNS system. [[User:Alice Margatroid|Alice Margatroid]] ([[User talk:Alice Margatroid|talk]])
#'''Support full blackout.''' [[User:Lunchable1|'''Lunchable1''']]
#'''Support''' Someone has probably already suggested this but: I think a temporary full blackout, followed by the click-through blackout screen would be best ([[User:Lexandalf|Lexandalf]] ([[User talk:Lexandalf|talk]]) 08:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC))
#'''Support'''. --[[User:Juusohe|Juusohe]] ([[User talk:Juusohe|talk]]) 08:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Juusohe}}
#'''Very Strong Support''' - blocking Wikipedia in USA will make it shut down, because its servers are located in the US, and it's an open encyclopedia, so it should be available to everyone. And, we can ignore block in Iran, but we can't ignore block in USA, because it's one of leading countries in computing technology. [[User:SiPlus|SiPlus]] ([[User talk:SiPlus|talk]]) 08:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Though SOPA is a United States bill, it will affect other countries all around the world. The bill does not only target websites hosted in the United States, but it also targets foreign websites. Futhermore, if the bill gets passed, more countries would undoubtedly follow suit. [[User:Wiikipedian|Wiiki]][[User talk:Wiikipedian|pe]][[Special:Contributions/Wiikipedian|dian]] 08:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Kameraad Pjotr|Kameraad Pjotr]] ([[User talk:Kameraad Pjotr|talk]]) 08:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Atario|Atario]] ([[User talk:Atario|talk]]) 09:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:Curson.dax|Curson.dax]] ([[User talk:Curson.dax|talk]]) 09:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#The consequences of a SOPA-like law being passed in the US will affect everyone. —'''[[User:Kusma|Kusma]]''' ([[User talk:Kusma|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Kusma|c]]) 09:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Definately a global block and banner, as the internet is shared by all. It's time to teach countries of the world that national decisions that will affect the way the internet itself behaves will have international repercussions.[[User:Gunderberg|Gunderberg]] ([[User talk:Gunderberg|talk]]) 09:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Shuipzv3|Shuipzv3]] ([[User talk:Shuipzv3|talk]]) 09:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The bill has global ramifications, so the blackout should be global as well. [[User:TheCatalyst31|TheCatalyst31]] [[User talk:TheCatalyst31|Reaction]]•[[Special:Contributions/TheCatalyst31|Creation]] 09:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:AndrewKemendo|Andrew]] ([[User talk:AndrewKemendo|talk]]) 09:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. SOPA will affect everyone, not just the US [[User:Tigger-oN|Tigger-oN]] ([[User talk:Tigger-oN|talk]]) 09:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - global implications. [[User:Buckshot06|Buckshot06]] [[User_talk:Buckshot06|(talk)]] 09:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''', per Tigger-oN. – Plarem ([[User:Plarem|User]] [[User talk:Plarem|talk]]) 09:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:theemstra|Thom]] 10:48 15 Januari 2012 (CET)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Joeyfjj|Joeyfjj]] ([[User talk:Joeyfjj|talk]]) 10:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. '''SOPA will affect everyone and the free information around of the world''' [[User:Xjmos|Xjmos]] ([[User talk:Xjmos|talk]]) 10:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. '''[[User:Nikthestoned|Nik]][[Special:Contributions/Nikthestoned|''the'']][[User talk:Nikthestoned|stoned]]''' 10:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:Kleuske|Kleuske]] ([[User talk:Kleuske|talk]]) 10:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:Americophile|'''<big>A</big>'''MERICOPHILE]] 10:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:ThePastIsObdurate|ThePastIsObdurate]] ([[User talk:ThePastIsObdurate|talk]]) 10:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', I support a global blackout. SOPA will destroy our freedom, our internet, out digital frontier. Let our words be heard by the world through global blackout. [[User:computerkidt|computerkidt]] 10:016, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Wikipedia belongs to everyone. [[User:Soewinhan|<big>'''S'''</big>'''WH''']] [[User talk:Soewinhan|talk]] 10:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Hom sepanta|Hom sepanta]] ([[User talk:Hom sepanta|talk]]) 10:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The more people know, the more harm can be avoided. [[User:Sioux.cz|Sioux.cz]] ([[User talk:Sioux.cz|talk]]) 10:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' As a user of the italian wikipedia, and as an italian user of the en.wikipedia, I think a global blackout should be appropriated. The SOPA is a global threat that would affect all of us, whatever is our homeland or our mothertongue, and all the open-source web. So, I think our action should be equally global. (PS: I hope my homewiki will join this protest)--[[User:Barbaking|Barbaking]] [[user talk:Barbaking|(talk)]] 10:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' We should make global community realise about the concern. --[[User:Octahedron80|Octra Bond]] ([[User talk:Octahedron80|talk]]) 10:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' This will raise awareness worldwide. [[User:Hekerui|Hekerui]] ([[User talk:Hekerui|talk]]) 10:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Tinithraviel 10:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - .com .net and .org are all de-facto American, therefore this is a global issue. [[User:Bienfuxia|阝工巳几千凹父工氐]] ([[User talk:Bienfuxia|talk]]) 11:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This is a global issue, what SOPA proposes to do to the internet in America will affect the whole world, as a result the whole world needs to be made aware of it. [[User:Zero no Kamen|Zero no Kamen]] ([[User talk:Zero no Kamen|talk]]) 11:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Global issue, like Zero no Kamen says. --[[User:Bender235|bender235]] ([[User talk:Bender235|talk]]) 11:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This is a global cause, hence global blackout. [[User:YregYorulis|YregYorulis]] ([[User talk:YregYorulis|talk]]) 11:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Global issue. --[[User:Blogotron|Blogotron]] ([[User talk:Blogotron|talk]]) 11:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Irandill|Irandill]] ([[User talk:Irandill|talk]]) 11:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' from [[Catalonia]]. --[[User:Lluis tgn|Lluis tgn]] ([[User talk:Lluis tgn|talk]]) 11:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Reboelje|Reboelje]] ([[User talk:Reboelje|talk]]) 12:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Strong support''' from [[Catalonia]]. --[[User:Davidpar|Davidpar]] ([[User talk:Davidpar|talk]]) 12:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Global issue — .com, .org and .net are effectively controlled by the US and the US is pretty good at asserting extraterritoriality when it wants to (see current [[Richard O'Dwyer]] case). I would weakly support a US blackout and global banner and ''very'' weakly support banner-only options. — [[:en:User:OwenBlacker|OwenBlacker]] ([[:en:User talk:OwenBlacker|Talk]]) 12:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' I'd rather see the US's control of the internet removed entirely, but a global blackout seems like a good start. [[User:Parrot of Doom|Parrot]] [[User talk:Parrot of Doom|of Doom]] 12:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:MrMarmite|MrMarmite]] ([[User talk:MrMarmite|talk]]) 12:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', to warn citizens and lawmakers in other countries against following proposals in SOPA's direction. [[User:Sietse|Sietse]] ([[User talk:Sietse|talk]]) 12:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', time to stop large corporation trying to overthrow a resource that should remain available to everyone without coporate constraint.[[User:Rjstott|Rjstott]] ([[User talk:Rjstott|talk]]) 12:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support'''. This need to happen. [[User:xDividedByZer0|xDividedByZer0]] ([[User talk:xDividedByZer0|talk]]) 13:31, 15 January 2012
#'''Support''' [[User:Mecanismo|Mecanismo]] | [[User talk:Mecanismo|Talk]] 12:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Chrisjohnson|Chrisjohnson]] ([[User talk:Chrisjohnson|talk]]) 12:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' either (1) or (2), but global could have more impact. --[[User:FoeNyx|FoeNyx]] ([[User talk:FoeNyx|talk]]) 12:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''', to awaken people on how important the freedom of the internet is. We need to do this! Then they will stand up and fight. [[User:Crew-L-T|Crew-L-T]] ([[User talk:Crew-L-T|talk]]) 12:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' The internet is a global phenomenon, thus global action is needed. Copyright violation is a real issue, but the SOPA laws are vastly over-reaching, giving private US copyright holders powers over the internet which are equivalent to those of the Chinese state. [[User talk:Sillyfolkboy|SFB]] 12:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' — [[User:TodorBozhinov|Toдor]] [[User talk:TodorBozhinov|Boжinov]] — 12:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Prolog|Prolog]] ([[User talk:Prolog|talk]]) 13:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Thincat|Thincat]] ([[User talk:Thincat|talk]]) 13:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Mighty Antar|Mighty Antar]] ([[User talk:Mighty Antar|talk]]) 13:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Im fine with both 1 and 2. I feel that the first option would be the more sensible one as its targeting seems more spot on, but at the same time i would not find it correct to primarily support a measure that would block other editors access while leaving my own in tact. [[User:Excirial|'''Excirial''']] ([[User talk:Excirial|Contact me]],[[Special:Contributions/Excirial|Contribs]]) 13:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Because SOPA affects us all. --[[User:FlavrSavr|FlavrSavr]] ([[User talk:FlavrSavr|talk]]) 13:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. SOPA affects everyone, not just the US [[User:Andrewmc123|<big>Andrewmc</big>]][[User talk:Andrewmc123|123]] 13:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Although I'm non-US & in UK, when I read on the [[SOPA]] page "The bill would authorize the U.S. Department of Justice to seek court orders against websites '''outside U.S. jurisdiction'''", this belief that the world's most powerful nation has the right to censor anyone on the planet and extend its laws anywhere it wants just because someone in the USA doesn't like something is more than worrying. Its a thin edge of the wedge. The US-UK [[Extradition Act 2003]] is already constantly in the UK press for how its being (ab)used by US lawmakers. I'd even support a full shut down of Wikipedia bar pages explaining why. One day's inconvenience is nothing compared to the effects laws like this can have on individuals lives if they're caught up trying to defend themselves against The State. Innocent until proven Guilty, etc. [[User:The Yeti|The Yeti]] ([[User talk:The Yeti|talk]]) 13:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. SOPA will potentially effect everyone, the whole web, incl. Wikipedia. I find it bizarre to think in terms of "nations", when the reality out here is something completely different. [[User:Landgang|Landgang]] ([[User talk:Landgang|talk]]) 13:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Olsi|Olsi]] ([[User talk:Olsi|talk]]) 14:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Sertmann|Sertmann]] ([[User talk:Sertmann|talk]]) 14:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Amazeroth|Amazeroth]] ([[User talk:Amazeroth|talk]]) 14:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. '''[[User:LouriePieterse|Lourie]][[User talk:LouriePieterse|Pieterse]]''' 14:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. This affects the global internet community. What's most important to US congress members is financial support from corporations/advertising - these corporations and their clients are spread around the whole world. [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 14:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Snowolf|Snowolf]] [[User talk:Snowolf|How can I help?]] 14:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Everyone should be aware of SOPA, as it will affect everyone, not only people in the USA. [[User:Amunak|Amunak]] ([[User talk:Amunak|talk]]) 14:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The Bill's effect will not be limited to the US - just ask [[Richard O'Dwyer]]. So I feel that it should be publicised to users in other countries. And the 'blackout' will not stop anyone using wiki - it will be just a click away. Regarding 'political' advocacy - if wikipedia had been around when the [[Mickey Mouse Protection Act]] was going through, this argument would have prevented argument against it. [[User:Alekksandr|Alekksandr]] ([[User talk:Alekksandr|talk]]) 14:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I live in the Republic of Turkey, where internet censorship is mostly on two grounds: obscenity and copyright infringement. The latter blocks legitimate sites, such as [[blip.tv]], Turkey is an example of what can happen once any censorship is allowed. And Turks don't understand why I object to censorship, having never lived without it. There's a large Turkish population contributing to Wikipedia, and surely from other countries where censorship is an issue. As I heard it from a couple Britons, the UK has also begun down this road. It's absolutely a global issue. --[[User:Quintucket|Quintucket]] ([[User talk:Quintucket|talk]]) 14:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' I'm not in the US, but these kinds of issues affect other countries too. [[User:Mdwh|Mdwh]] ([[User talk:Mdwh|talk]]) 14:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''--[[User:Milad A380|Milad A380]] ([[User talk:Milad A380|talk]]) 14:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Is the only way people react. --[[User:Kizar|Kizar]] ([[User talk:Kizar|talk]]) 14:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. In Brazil we also struggle with attempts to control the internet. I think a global protest is needed, as the issues are very similar. However, if in the end the community decides for a US blackout only, the banners in other countries should be able to express the connection between various attempts to control the internet and free expression in general.
#'''Support'''. '''[[User:Jcaraballo|Jca]][[User Talk:Jcaraballo|raballo]]''' 14:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Tange|Tange]] ([[User talk:Tange|talk]]) 15:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. If not this, then (1). Also, soft-blackout, as opposed to full blackout. --{{User-multi
|User=Imagine Wizard
|1=t
|2=c
|3=ct
|sup=
|doc=yes
}} [[Pig Latin|Iway amway Imagineway Izardway.]] 15:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This concerns us all. --[[User:Berntie|Berntie]] ([[User talk:Berntie|talk]]) 15:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Finar|Finar]] ([[User talk:Finar|talk]]) 15:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''support'''. go global... if SOPA goes into affect it won't affect just the US, it will affect everybody else. And lets face it, the other countries can apply some pressure on US politicians.---'''[[User:Balloonman|Balloonman]]''' ''[[User talk:Balloonman|Poppa Balloon]]'' 15:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I'm in Europe, but internet censorship affects everyone, everywhere. [[User:Nanea|Nanea]] ([[User talk:Nanea|talk]]) 15:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', as it may draw attention to similar proposals worldwide. [[User:Stordoff|Stordoff]] ([[User talk:Stordoff|talk]]) 15:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' If this bill passes, the USA will no doubt become the de-facto standard for the rest of the word. [[User:Curtiswwe|Curtiswwe]] ([[User talk:Curtiswwe|talk]]) 15:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Worldwide, the public needs to know and feel the affects of legislation(s) which would affect their lives if passed Ne0Freedom 15:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Even though it is the US politicians fault, it will still affect countries everywhere, notably Canada.[[User:Eshade|Eshade]] ([[User talk:Eshade|talk]]) 16:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. More effective; and definitively this will affect the public worldwide who needs to know about this. If not this, then (1) - [[User:Benzband|benzband]] ([[User talk:Benzband|talk]]) 16:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This is a major threat to Wikipedia worldwide, it needs to get the attention. Maybe some people who don't care about SOPA will learn to respect the matter. [[User:Pitke|Pitke]] ([[User talk:Pitke|talk]]) 16:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This bill has global implications. We need to get everyone to fight censorship everywhere [[User:Rrrr5|Rrrr5]] ([[User talk:Rrrr5|talk]]) 16:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support: '''The internet is not bound by any borders and so I don't see why geographic location should factor into this at all. I strongly support this move by Wikipedia. Good call. --[[User:DiscipleOfKnowledge]] ([[User talk:DiscipleOfKnowledge|talk]]) 16:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support:''' Should i repeat all the arguments above ?let's give world a rest day, see what it provokes. [[User:Zeugma fr|Zeugma fr]] ([[User talk:Zeugma fr|talk]]) 16:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' SOPA will affect all versions of wikipedia, not just the US one. --[[User:Enric Naval|Enric Naval]] ([[User talk:Enric Naval|talk]]) 16:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Internet censorship on a large scale? F*ck no, even if I'm not a US resident. [[User:Rev-san|Rev L. Snowfox]] ([[User talk:Rev-san|talk]]) 16:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. What happens in US affects all the world. All users of en wiki would be affected, not just those in the USA. Let them feel it. And anyway, they have theirl local wikipedias to run to if needed. --[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus| talk to me]] 16:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:A.Savin|A.Savin]] ([[User talk:A.Savin|talk]]) 16:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' It affects us all! [[User:Xaromir|Xaromir]] ([[User talk:Xaromir|talk]]) 16:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. We are all in this together. Let's send a message that will be heard. ''—[[User:Mzajac |Michael]] [[User talk:Mzajac |Z.]] 2012-01-15 16:50 z''
#'''Support'''. [[User:Gabi83tm|Gabi83tm]] ([[User talk:Gabi83tm|talk]]) 16:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''; number 1 as an alternative. SOPA endangers the globe, not just the USA. I'd prefer no work-around, but a link to the addresses of the Congress members and President would be useful to many. [[User:OtterSmith|htom]] ([[User talk:OtterSmith|talk]]) 17:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''--[[User:Cattus|Cattus]] [[User talk:Cattus|talk]] 17:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''--[[User:Saehrimnir|Saehrimnir]] ([[User talk:Saehrimnir|talk]]) 17:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' We're all affected by what the US legislature enacts against freedom of expression, which in this instance touches crucially on web users world-wide: if democratic freedoms are in retreat in the US (as in the UK) there's no obvious reason not to highlight the SOPA issue to the Chinese too - at least those of them who have bothered to master the English language enough to use English language Wikipedia. [[User:Charles01|Charles01]] ([[User talk:Charles01|talk]]) 17:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Wikipedia's scope is global, and likewise an issue that could affect a very significant portion of both its articles and users should have significant global awareness. -[[User:Jhortman|Jhortman]] ([[User talk:Jhortman|talk]]) 17:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:MusicaleCA|MusicaleCA]] ([[User talk:MusicaleCA|talk]]) 17:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Because of the ramifications this bill will have on Wikipedia and the potential chilling affects we must make a strong stand as a community before it is too late. I support a full global blackout. --[[User:BHC|BHC]] ([[User talk:BHC|talk]]) 17:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support Global blackout'''. -- [[User:Jokes Free4Me|Jokes Free4Me]] ([[User talk:Jokes Free4Me|talk]]) 17:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. The effects of this will be felt globally, so it makes sense that the protest is also global. [[User talk:Alistairjh|'''DeMoN''''''2009''']] 17:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. The internet is global, the protest should be global. [[User:LeedsHK16|LeedsHK16]] ([[User talk:LeedsHK16|talk]]) 18:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. (From France) Similar laws are being voted everywhere. The first W of WWW shall not loose its meaning. --[[User:Arcaruron|Arcaruron]] ([[User talk:Arcaruron|talk]]) 18:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' . This shall hurt the web which should be open everywhere else, and for reasons aforementioned.--[[User:Stephenwanjau|Stephenwanjau]] ([[User talk:Stephenwanjau|talk]]) 18:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' . [[User:Gabriel Kielland|Gabriel Kielland]] ([[User talk:Gabriel Kielland|talk]]) 18:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' It affects all of us, not just US citizens! [[User:jscholt|jscholt]] 18:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' . It may have a strong impact on the Internet.[[User:Ionutzmovie|Ionutzmovie]] ([[User talk:Ionutzmovie|talk]]) 18:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Processr|Processr]] ([[User talk:Processr|talk]]) 18:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong oppose''': (The instructions ask me to support one option; but the only opinion I have about the options is that this one is terrible.) This is a US-only issue, please don't pollute other english-speaking countries' use of Wikipedia with US political debate. I'm fully aware that people outside the US make use of US websites and therefore could be affected by SOPA, but the same could be said of all countries. --[[User:Mcld|mcld]] ([[User talk:Mcld|talk]]) 18:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Very Very Strong Support'''. [[User:Pug6666|Pug6666]] ([[User talk:Pug6666|talk]]) 18:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support'''. This issue affects people outside the US, [[User:Mcld|mcld]] needs to realize that others countries CAN and WILL follow suit. - [[User:Another n00b|Another n00b]] ([[User talk:Another n00b|talk]]) 18:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Jsem|Jsem]] Global blackout means global awareness. The act will have an effect not only in the US, but globally - make everyone aware of this before similar legislative efforts also reach other nations.
#'''Support'''-- first choice. Our servers are in the US-- international readers need to know about this threat. --[[User:HectorMoffet|HectorMoffet]] ([[User talk:HectorMoffet|talk]]) 19:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Ricardo Oliveros Ramos|Ricardo Oliveros Ramos]] ([[User talk:Ricardo Oliveros Ramos|talk]]) 19:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Marin M.|Marin M.]] ([[User talk:Marin M.|talk]]) 19:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Chmee2|Chmee2]] ([[User talk:Chmee2|talk]]) 19:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' SOPA's effects will be felt worldwide, and should be opposed worldwide. ---'''[[User:RepublicanJacobite|RepublicanJacobite]]'''''[[User talk:RepublicanJacobite|TheFortyFive]]'' 19:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. In order to be effective, the blackout needs to be as widespread as possible. [[User:Angelikfire|Angelikfire]] ([[User talk:Angelikfire|talk]]) 19:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. --[[User:Ragimiri|Ragimiri]] ([[User talk:Ragimiri|talk]]) 19:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Waldir|Waldir]] [[User talk:Waldir|talk]] 19:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' Everyone on planet earth will be censored that way, even in the free, northern European countries, STOP CENSORSHIP! It's a reason i will not go to Italy or China. Wikipedia is meant to be free, and may never be hunted down by any government. The USgov should shame itself for their hypocritical idea of freedom. The only time we hear BLEEP, it comes from the US! The so-called free country. [[User:OPolkruikenz|OPolkruikenz]] ([[User talk:OPolkruikenz|talk]]) 20:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. — [[User:JViejo|'''''JViejo''''']] ([[User_talk:JViejo|tell me]])
# '''Support'''. Not everyone is aware enough of SOPA in outside countries, even in the UK. We need to raise awareness of how devastating it will be to the independance of sites on the internet. --[[User:Thejadefalcon|Thejadefalcon]][[User talk:Thejadefalcon|''Sing your song'']][[Special:Contributions/Thejadefalcon|''The bird's seeds'']] 20:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:JViejo|JViejo]] 20:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Chetmurphy|Chetmurphy]] ([[User talk:Chetmurphy|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Chetmurphy|contribs]]) 
#'''Support''' both #1 (US) and #2 (Global). Global blackout is preferred. //[[USER:Blaxthos|Blaxthos]] ( [[User Talk:Blaxthos|t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Blaxthos|c]] ) 20:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' If the internet does not stand up for itself, who will?
#'''Support''' so that the rest of the world learns if the US is really "the land of the free". — ⟨[[User_talk:Uzdzislaw|✆]]∣[[User:Uzdzislaw|µzdzisław]]∣[[Special:Contributions/Uzdzislaw|⚒]]⟩ 20:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:MarlinMr|MarlinMr]] ([[User talk:MarlinMr|talk]]) 20:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' To show the world that we care about SOPA. Good luck everyone! [[User:Major Bloodnok|Ben (Major Bloodnok)]] ([[User talk:Major Bloodnok|talk]]) 20:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'' Absolutely needed. Now it's just US, but you feel the pressure of the US is already affecting European policy makers. —[[User:TheDJ|TheDJ]] ([[User talk:TheDJ|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TheDJ|contribs]]) 20:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I have mixed feelings about pushing US politics on other nations, but this evil legislation will ultimately affect everyone so I'm going with global. —[[User:Geiserick|Geiserick]] ([[User talk:Geiserick|talk]]) 20:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Wikipedia should be neutral, but SOPA's eventual consequences seem to harsh to just neutrally ignore. I live in Denmark where some ISPs have blocked certain sites, and while SOPA might not have a major effect on me because I live outside the US, I'm against it because of how it would worsen online freedom (which is not just applicable to people doing "piracy", a buzzword people should stop using, but also for many, many good things). Everyone should know. [[User:NqpZ|NqpZ]] ([[User talk:NqpZ|talk]]) 20:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The effects of SOPA will be felt world wide so the protest should also be world wide. Better a day of voluntary black out, than an eternity of censorship.
#'''Support'''. Since the servers are mostly in the US, this will affect us all. It will also affect global sites other than Wikipedia; so this gives me (a UK resident) the chance to protest the US Congress's attempt to impose a global rule by unilateral action. A total blackout will show the world what they're at risk of losing. [[User:Alec.brady|Alec.brady]] ([[User talk:Alec.brady|talk]]) 21:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:pratstercs|Pratstercs]][[User_talk:pratstercs|Talk to me]] 21:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Datapolitical|Datapolitical]] ([[User talk:Datapolitical|talk]]) 21:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. SOPA will affect internet users worldwide, so I support a global blackout. [[User:Stiaand|Stiaand]] ([[User talk:Stiaand|talk]]) 21:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. It is one Internet and one world. Wikipedia should not use geolocation like that. Geolocation is a bad thing in my eyes and only used to prevent global free speech and enforce outdated copyright regions. [[User:Real Joe Cool|Real Joe Cool]] ([[User talk:Real Joe Cool|talk]]) 21:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. While it's something that is primarily a US issue, I think it's important that the global community protest as well. [[User:Krazykillaz|Krazykillaz]] ([[User talk:Krazykillaz|talk]]) 21:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This will get attention. --[[User:Braniff747SP|Braniff747SP]] ([[User talk:Braniff747SP|talk]]) 21:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Internet is worldwide; The laws will affect ALL internet users, not just the ones in the U.S. And honestly, if these bills pass in the U.S., it'll enable other countries to pass such bills as well. This is a worldwide issue!
# '''Support'''. The only page or information that should be unblocked should be describing SOPA, so people can still use wikipedia for information about the blackout. 22:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support.''' [[User:Fifelfoo|Fifelfoo]] ([[User talk:Fifelfoo|talk]]) 21:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Just because SOPA is primarily American doesn't mean it won't affect us all. The internet is worldwide (World Wide Web), and this could damage the internet if passed, so I support a world wide blackout. [[User:GeekofGames51|GeekofGames51]] ([[User talk:GeekofGames51|talk]]) 21:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. One Day without Wikipedia won't kill anybody; it's necessary to get more attention. --[[User:Slay555pt|Slay555pt]] ([[User talk:Slay555pt|talk]]) 22:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' If SOPA affects Wikipedia, it will affect everyone, not just in the United States. '''''Whenaxis''''' [[User:Whenaxis|about]] | [[User talk:Whenaxis|talk]] 22:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Rathgemz|Rathgemz]] ([[User talk:Rathgemz|talk]]) 22:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Behnam|Behnam]] ([[User talk:Behnam|talk]]) 22:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''; the law is American – its effect are worldwide. While the rest of the world may not be able to influence voting, worldwide grumbling ''is'' heard in Washington. — [[User:Coren|Coren]] [[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]] 22:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:BohemianRhapsody|BohemianRhapsody]] ([[User talk:BohemianRhapsody|talk]]) 22:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''; full global blackout. –[[User:TheIguana|'''TheIguana''']] ([[User talk:TheIguana|talk]]) 22:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This is about getting people's attention. Why limit it to English Wikipedia? [[User:NeuroE|NeuroE]] ([[User talk:NeuroE|talk]]) 22:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Bunnyboi|Bunnyboi]] ([[User talk:Bunnyboi|talk]]) 22:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The world needs to take notice, international pressure against SOPA would be the final nail in the coffin for the bill. [[Special:Contributions/184.175.2.46|184.175.2.46]] ([[User talk:184.175.2.46|talk]]) 22:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User talk:Rjwilmsi|'''''Rjwilmsi''''']] 22:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Maxkramer|Maxwell Kramer]] ([[User talk:Maxkramer|talk]]) 23:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Mlm42|Mlm42]] ([[User talk:Mlm42|talk]]) 23:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The blackout must be global (UK-based user). [[User:Tiller54|Tiller54]] ([[User talk:Tiller54|talk]]) 23:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:A Dirty Watermelon|A Dirty Watermelon]]
# '''Support'''. "The Internet is a ''global'' system", emphasis added, are the first six words on Wikipedia's entry for [[Internet]] right now. --[[User:Sbp|Sbp]] ([[User talk:Sbp|talk]]) 23:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Haseo9999|Haseo9999]] ([[User talk:Haseo9999|talk]]) 23:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Timwi|Timwi]] ([[User talk:Timwi|talk]]) 23:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. it's quite apparent that the infrastructure of the internet doesn't translate to our geographical understanding of the world. Wikipedia is a predominantly based and hosted in the US (is my understanding), and therefore a decision in the US would have a disproportionate effect on the global wikipedia user base. Legislating such a complex system as the internet at this stage in it's history by people with such a fundamentally poor understanding of it doesn't seem close to reason. Wikipedia has a good platform to speak out against the notion of censoring the internet, and it should in the strongest possible terms. - [[User:Timgreene|Tim Greene]] 23:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Nubzor|Nubzor]] ([[User talk:Nubzor|talk]]) 23:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''The biggest Support which could even exist in the world''' from Brazil. [[User:MetalBrasil|MetalBrasil]] ([[User talk:MetalBrasil|talk]]) 23:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Alexcho|Alexcho]] ([[User talk:Alexcho|talk]]) 23:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Bahati|Bahati]] ([[User talk:Bahati|talk]]) 23:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#<s>'''Very Strongly Support'''.</s> Moving support to "Full blackout". [[User:EmJayCrawford|EmJayCrawford]] ([[User talk:EmJayCrawford|talk]]) 23:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', after much consideration. There are multiple reasons why the blackout should be global: a) SOPA's ultimate targets are websites outside the U.S.'s jurisdiction; b) it is much simpler to implement from a technical perspective; c) a protest action should be as attention-grabbing as possible; d) the U.S. portion of the community would not be available to help run the site for that period, leaving the ranks of processes such as RC patrol short-handed; and e) the bill threatens Wikipedia to such an extent that the entire community needs to stand up united against it. [[User:Titoxd|Titoxd]]([[User talk:Titoxd|?!?]] - [[WP:FAC|cool stuff]]) 23:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' Any possibility of Internet infringement by the government (unless in case of worlwide, rapid, war-like virus/hack) must be eliminated! -[[User:Wingdude88|The Wing Dude, Musical Extraordinaire]] ([[User talk:Wingdude88|talk]]) 23:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', though I would also support (1). [[User:Nineworlds|Nineworlds]] ([[User talk:Nineworlds|talk]]) 23:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Busha5a5a5|Busha5a5a5]] ([[User talk:Busha5a5a5|talk]]) 23:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', [[User:Marcus Rowland|Marcus Rowland]] ([[User talk:Marcus Rowland|talk]]) 23:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC) This is a global issue, I'm in Britain but I think that the consequences of this misguided and badly-written law are serious enough that it should be brought to everyone's attention.
#'''Support'''. [[User:Þorkell Einarsson|Þorkell Einarsson]] ([[User talk:Þorkell Einarsson|talk]]) 23:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. It is not only Americans who will be affected. If they cannot access the sites, other people on those sites will suffer as well. [[User:Cauhtcoatl|Cauhtcoatl]] ([[User talk:Cauhtcoatl|talk]]) 23:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. See what Agvulpine said. [[User:InTheRevolution2|InTheRevolution2]] ([[User talk:InTheRevolution2|talk]]) 23:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly support'''. [[User:Julianhall|Julianhall]] ([[User talk:Julianhall|talk]]) 23:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Jandalhandler|Jandalhandler]] ([[User talk:Jandalhandler|talk]]) 23:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. (worldwide blackout) Passing of SOPA in USA will have repercussions for the rest of the world. SOPA is not just an American issue anymore. Everyone has to be informed and involved. [[User:Spyvsspycomputers]] 23:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Spyvsspycomputers}}
#'''Support'''. Per Spyvsspycomputers. '''[[User:NereusAJ|NereusAJ]] ([[User talk:NereusAJ|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/NereusAJ|C]])''' 00:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' – [[User:Smyth|Smyth]]\[[User talk:Smyth|talk]] 00:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' anything less is half-assed. full support. ... [[user:avriette|aa]]:[[user_talk:avriette|talk]] 00:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:AndyGraham10|AndyGraham10]] ([[User talk:AndyGraham10|talk]]) 00:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|AndyGraham10}}
#'''Support''' this. --[[User:HylgeriaK|HylgeriaK]] ([[User talk:HylgeriaK|talk]]) 00:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' International pressure would kill this bill 100% [[User:Spaceshuttlediscovery|Spaceshuttlediscovery]] ([[User talk:Spaceshuttlediscovery|talk]]) 00:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Fowlerism|Fowlerism]] ([[User talk:Fowlerism|talk]]) 00:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC) {{spa|Fowlerism}}
#'''Support''': I'm going with this because sadly I don't think just a banner is going to get the world's attention. [[User:Starfleet Academy|Starfleet Academy]] "[[User talk:Starfleet Academy|Live long]] [[Special:Contributions/Starfleet Academy|and prosper.]]" 01:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Kreachure|Kreachure]] ([[User talk:Kreachure|talk]]) 01:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Atomic7732|atomic]][[User_talk:atomic7732|77]][[User:Atomic7732/2010_List_of_Cyclones|32]] 01:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Hello71|Hello71]] ([[User talk:Hello71|talk]]) 01:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Ltr,ftw|Ltr,ftw]] ([[User talk:Ltr,ftw|talk]]) 01:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Styko|Styko]] ([[User talk:Styko|talk]]) 01:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Styko}}
#'''Support'''. [[User:Nekiko|Nekiko]] ([[User talk:Nekiko|talk]]) 01:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly support''' For many, many years other countries have looked to the USA to see the future. I do not want SOPA-like initiatives to spread to my back yard. (Also ditto [[User:Jean_Of_mArc|Jean_Of_mArc]]'s comment; "please make your SOPA banner distinct from the fund-raising banners so that users don't dismiss it thinking that they've seen and read it before") [[User:Katana|Katana]] ([[User talk:Katana|talk]]) 01:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 02:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Trashbird1240|Trashbird1240]] ([[User talk:Trashbird1240|talk]]) 02:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' [[User:Starship.paint|Starship.paint]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|talk]]) 02:19, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' – [[User:Sapphire Dragon777|Sapphire Dragon777]] ([[User talk:Sapphire Dragon777|talk]]) 02:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' - This bill will have a huge impact on not just the United States, but the entire world. Countless websites from the United States that are used internationally, such as wikimedia itself, will be heavily impacted by this bill. The rest of the world needs to know how this bill will also affect them as well. [[User:Seahorseruler|'''Seahorseruler''']] [[User talk:Seahorseruler|(Talk Page)]] [[Special:Contributions/Seahorseruler|(Contribs)]] ([[WP:AIV|Report a Vandal]]) 02:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - A global blackout to protest a globally damaging proposal. ''[[User:Swarm|Swarm]]'' [[User talk:Swarm|X]] 02:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Kennethhurst|Kennethhurst]] ([[User talk:Kennethhurst|talk]]) 02:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Nessman|Nessman]] ([[User talk:Nessman|talk]]) 02:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#I'm Canadian, and you'd better believe this'll have an effect on me if it passes. [[User:Master&Expert|'''Master&'''Expert]] ([[User talk:Master&Expert|Talk]]) 03:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. [[User:Vaprotan|Vaprotan]] ([[User talk:Vaprotan|talk]]) 03:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Very Very Very Strong Support''' This must end NOW! [[user:yrtneg|--]][[user:yrtneg|'''yrtneg''']] ([[User talk:Yrtneg|talk]]) [[Wikipedia:SOPA initiative/Action|STOP SOPA NOW!]] 03:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Extreme Strong Support''' The United States Does not own the Internet. Congressman Smith's actions endanger the free internet and he should resign at once. Shame on the RIAA and MPAA for demanding this legislation!!! [[User:Magnum Serpentine|Magnum Serpentine]] ([[User talk:Magnum Serpentine|talk]]) 03:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. It'd be a shame to lose Wikipedia as a resource if SOPA passes, but the more backing the protest has, the less likely this will even have to happen. - [[User:New Age Retro Hippie|New Age Retro Hippie]] [[User talk:New Age Retro Hippie|(talk)]] [[Special:Contributions/New Age Retro Hippie|(contributions)]] 03:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The US is the current superpower of the world, and it'll affect the rest of world. More SOPA-like bills will most likely be proposed in other countries. [[User:EryZ|EryZ]] ([[User talk:EryZ|talk]]) 03:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' either (1) or (2), but strongly prefer global, as it sends the message planet-wide. --[[User:Orangemike|Orange Mike]] | [[User talk:Orangemike|Talk]] 04:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Extremely Strongly Support'''. This is not just about the United States. Ultimately it is about every person on the planet. It is about governmental control of the people's access to ''information itself''. --[[User:Bluejay Young|Bluejay Young]] ([[User talk:Bluejay Young|talk]]) 04:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 04:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' The issue is a global one and should be treated as such . [[User:Voiderest|Voiderest]] ([[User talk:Voiderest|talk]]) 04:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Saveur|Saveur]] ([[User talk:Saveur|talk]]) 04:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:SteveStrummer|SteveStrummer]] ([[User talk:SteveStrummer|talk]]) 04:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#Since 1 isn't going to pass --[[User:Guerillero|Guerillero]] | [[User_talk:Guerillero|My Talk]] 04:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support.''' Global activism could increase pressure on the US (Congress and President). [[User:Fishal|Fishal]] ([[User talk:Fishal|talk]]) 04:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support Strongly''' This law would affect worldwide web interfaces. Support the global blackout and banner--- — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jman279|Jman279]] ([[User talk:Jman279|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jman279|contribs]]) 04:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Corbon|Corbon]] ([[User talk:Corbon|talk]]) 04:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This is a global issue, at least because of how SOPA would affect the DNS. Thus, the message must be global as well. --[[User:BloodyRose|Bloody Rose]] ([[User talk:BloodyRose|talk]]) 04:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support Strongly''' While the most direct effect would fall on Americans, this law affects users of the Internet all around the world. Not as much can be done by we non-Americans to influence the vote by contacting lawmakers, but more exposure for the issue is extremely helpful. A public outcry is what is needed, and international outrage is a powerful motivator. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Rituido|Rituido]] ([[User talk:Rituido|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Rituido|contribs]]) 04:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Getting people all over the world to contact their governments about their concerns, who can then be pressured into calling up their local American embassy makes sense. [[User:orathaic]]
# In my mind it would not really make sense to do a US only blackout. We're after media attention here, to be noticed. The full lockout last year of the Italian Wikipedia worked. SOPA will affect Wikipedia, which is a worldwide resource and would be affected across the globe by SOPA. While it is true that Wikipedia shouldn't generally be used for politics (Wikipedia is not-for profit, etc etc) I'd rather that we do that for one day as opposed to having our hands forced by legislation for eternity. This isn't an ideal course of action, but desperate times call for desperate measures. [[User:Steven Zhang|Steven]] [[User talk:Steven Zhang|Zhang]] [[WP:DRP|Join the DR army!]] 05:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Super Hella Strong Support''' Corporations are global entities. They need to know that SOPA-like legislation is unacceptable everywhere. Our global comrades need to be made aware what we are up against. [[User_talk:Saudade7|Saudade7]] 05:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. After US reaction to 9/11 and specially after attacking Iraq, global haterd against US had a sharp rise. Since, Obama's administration in power, US became very concerned with this global hatred. With a global black out, we are making a direct relation with approval of SOPA and increase in this global hatred. This might make them think twice before voting in favor of SOAPA.[[User:Bossudenotredame|Bossudenotredame]] ([[User talk:Bossudenotredame|talk]]) 05:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. The law may be a national action but it will have global results. The actions of Wikipedia should reflect this. -[[User:ClockworkLunch|ClockworkLunch]] ([[User talk:ClockworkLunch|talk]]) 05:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:GetThePapersGetThePapers|GetThePapersGetThePapers]] ([[User talk:GetThePapersGetThePapers|talk]]) 05:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Prattmic|prattmic]] ([[User talk:Prattmic|talk]]) 05:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Majority of the servers of the 'important' and 'helpful' sites are located in US, thus repercussions of SOPA would be felt throughout the world and will not be localised in US. Thus although non-US citizens can do precious little, but it would raise awareness about the threats to net freedom. On a separate note I would like to quote an anon guy from FB who said 'I dont support piracy but I support freedom', this should be stance of wikimedia[[User:Legaleagle86|LegalEagle]] ([[User talk:Legaleagle86|talk]]) 05:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' I feel that it would have the most impact, and gain the most notice (and therefore notice for the issue) this way. [[User:Kuralyov|Kuralyov]] ([[User talk:Kuralyov|talk]]) 05:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Jovianeye|Jovian Eye]] [[User talk:Jovianeye|storm]] 05:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Wikipedia should be blacked out globally, as a message to other countries who might want to follow the United States in censoring the Internet. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ryan392|Ryan392]] ([[User talk:Ryan392|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ryan392|contribs]]) 05:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. Salman Gurung 06:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding comment added by {{user|Samsujata}}
#'''Support'''. [[User:Robert0122|Robert0122]] ([[User talk:Robert0122|talk]]) 06:19, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', I support a full global blackout. The US has an enormous political influence, globally; any policy like SOPA is a direct attack on Freedom of Communication Rights. [[User:Nerd65536|Nerd65536]] ([[User talk:Nerd65536|talk]]) 06:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. We don't want our supermarkets (internet sites) shut down simply because someone posts a notice on the community noticeboard about stolen property (copyrighted material) [[User:Dahvyd|Dahvyd]] ([[User talk:Dahvyd|talk]]) 06:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:FattestSurfer|FattestSurfer]] ([[User talk:FattestSurfer|talk]]) 06:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC) Full global blackout, coming from someone who relies upon this site on a regular basis. USA needs to know, and the rest of the world needs to know that some of us in the US are still sane, thank you very much.
#'''Support''' - As the situation with Richard O'Dwyer shows '''being a citizen of ''another'' country DOES NOT MATTER'''. The fact the US is extraditing a '''UK citizen''' for things that are according to many legal experts are '''not even a crime in his native UK''' shows that US interpretation of copyright extends far beyond it borders and it does NOT matter what your local laws are! So logically SOPA will effect the entire world.--[[User:BruceGrubb|BruceGrubb]] ([[User talk:BruceGrubb|talk]]) 06:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# Support, the US gets upset when other countries pass laws that affect it, let's see the rest of the world get upset with us. [[User:Al-Fozail ibn Iyaz|Al-Fozail ibn Iyaz]] ([[User talk:Al-Fozail ibn Iyaz|talk]]) 06:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:Wwahammy|Hammy]] ([[User talk:Wwahammy|talk]]) 06:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:One Salient Oversight|One Salient Oversight]] ([[User talk:One Salient Oversight|talk]]) 07:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC) I live in Australia. We follow what US does. We in the world community need to stand up to what might happen to us.
#'''Support'''. [[User:WHLfan|WHLfan]] ([[User talk:WHLfan|talk]]) 07:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Strong support''' - Its not only the US that will get affected, so many of the web's servers are located in the US, with them abiding US regulations. Besides, US users could access Wikipedia using tor/overseas proxies. I say block the site for everyone, with no exceptions. --[[User:Chinneeb|chinneeb]]-[[User_talk:Chinneeb|talk]] 07:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. My reasons are given in a section further down this page. [[User:Zazpot|zazpot]] ([[User talk:Zazpot|talk]]) 07:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Dtyger|Dtyger]] ([[User talk:Dtyger|talk]]) 07:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' this (relatively) moderate approach. We're all global citizens now. Let's not play the ''total-blackout'' card too soon, if at all. [[User:Braincricket|Braincricket]] ([[User talk:Braincricket|talk]]) 07:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Somteimes I think it's like the whole of the USA is against us on the internet, you know? Sometimes it feels like I'm going to wake up one morning and I don't know if wikipedia is going to be there. How can America be so reckless? Because my God, my sweet sweet God, I never thought I'd be signing something like this. I never thought I'd be calling for a global blackout. But if that's what it takes to raise international consciousness to the level it gotta be at? Man, sign me on up for that shit. But I want you all to know, you all who are reading this are witnesses to what I say here today, that it is with a heavy heart that I sign this page, and may God have mercy on us all. May God have mercy on the politicians debating SOPA. May he guide them to making the right decision. God is so good. Halleluah, Amen. Good night... ''and good luck''. [[User:SlipperySalmon|SlipperySalmon]] ([[User talk:SlipperySalmon|talk]]) 07:38, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - A bill as radical as this is certain to have far-reaching repercussions, well beyond the confines of the United States of America. [[User:Shademe|~shadeMe]] ([[User talk:Shademe|talk]]) 07:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - SOPA will affect people outside of the U.S., and this may help draw international attention to the bill. —Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/76.29.58.244|76.29.58.244]] ([[User talk:76.29.58.244|talk]]) 07:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. SOPA in the USA will affect people and businesses around the world. Global attention is appropriate. [[User:Ds13|Ds13]] ([[User talk:Ds13|talk]]) 07:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' global blackout. Wikipedia protesting SOPA isn't politics, it's self-preservation. We need something this drastic; I know how stubborn US politicians are. And it should be global, because Wikipedia is a global resource. We're all in this together. [[User:Wehpudicabok|Wehpudicabok]] ([[User talk:Wehpudicabok|talk]]) 07:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' We must show the governments of the world that this kind of legislation is completely unacceptable. [[User:Dsavi|Dsavi]] ([[User talk:Dsavi|talk]]) 08:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Vivacissamamente|vivacissamamente]] ([[User talk:Vivacissamamente|talk]]) 08:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' - SOPA is not intended to deal with domestic persons. This legislation is meant to cut off financial backing to international organizations at the request of [[Intellectual_property|IP]] holders, eliminating the overhead of due process. The accused have no rights. They are the mercy of the United States. Wikipedia deals heavily in user-edited IP, and would be an easy target. It has a responsibility to stand up for it's own freedom. --[[User:Elephanthunter|Elephanthunter]] ([[User talk:Elephanthunter|talk]]) 08:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The action should be as strong and widely distributed as possible. --[[User:PhilipWinter|PhilipWinter]] ([[User talk:PhilipWinter|talk]]) 08:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. I support a global blackout and banner, as SOPA will affect foreign as well as US domestic sites. --[[User:JonMarkGo|JonMarkGo]] ([[User talk:JonMarkGo|talk]]) 12:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. The more people that're exposed to an anti-censorship message and informed about whats at stake, the better- Both within and outside the US.--[[User:Lerikson|Lerikson]] ([[User talk:Lerikson|talk]]) 08:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' (from Italy), because SOPA affects us all. --[[User:Retaggio|Retaggio]] ([[User talk:Retaggio|talk]]) 09:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Total support'''. The internet has been the place of freedom for an entire generation. SOPA is the latest, and most severe Big Brother attempt to date. The world needs freedom. Supporters of SOPA and PIPA must open their eyes. --[[User:MrStavanger|MrStavanger]] ([[User talk:MrStavanger|talk]]) 09:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' If SOPA is passed in the US, other countries will follow suit. It is important to raise awareness now. --[[User:Dittaeva|Dittaeva]] ([[User talk:Dittaeva|talk]]) 09:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:DimiTalen|'''Dimi'''Talen]] 09:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Riwnodennyk|Riwnodennyk]] [[User talk:Riwnodennyk|✉]] 09:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Extremely Strongly Support''' SOPA affects the entire world, not just the US. As an Australian Wikipedian, I can conclusively state that it would have a negative effect on the global internet, probably destroying it. Unfortunately, the issue is almost totally unknown outside of the US. It ''must'' be brought to worldwide consciousness-or else the repercussions will be horrible. --[[User:Stealthysis|Stealthy]] ([[User talk:Stealthysis|talk]]) 09:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Kpengboy|Kpengboy]] ([[User talk:Kpengboy|talk]]) 09:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' — [[User:Nkocharh|ʞɔıu]] 09:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''SUPPORT''' Anyone who thinks this SOPA is an "American only" or a "political" thing is an idiot. If this Orwellian scheme goes ahead, mark my words, it'll be the thin end of the wedge... watch as other countries like Australia, UK, Canada, etc. trip over themselves implementing similar draconian measures. KEEP THE INTERNET FREE! [[User:Jquarry|JQ]] ([[User talk:Jquarry|talk]]) 09:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. YES, do support-it globally, it will increase awareness on SOPA! — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dl ionescus|Dl ionescus]] ([[User talk:Dl ionescus|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dl ionescus|contribs]]) 10:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:CaAl|CaAl]] ([[User talk:CaAl|talk]]) 10:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC) SOPA will have global effects — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:CaAl|CaAl]] ([[User talk:CaAl|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/CaAl|contribs]]) 10:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' as SOPA/PIPA may be a US law, but it affects a global industry. [[User:Osarius|Osarius]] : [[User_talk:Osarius|T]] : [[Special:Contributions/Osarius|C]] : [[User:Osarius/CSD|Been CSD'd?]] 10:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' [[User:TedTed|TedTed]] ([[User talk:TedTed|talk]]) 11:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. [[User:Talgalili|Tal Galili]] ([[User talk:Talgalili|talk]]) 11:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Dralokyn|Dralokyn]] ([[User talk:Dralokyn|talk]]) 11:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly support''' - needs a global, strong statement as the effects would not be limited to US only. [[User:Ingolfson|Ingolfson]] ([[User talk:Ingolfson|talk]]) 11:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly support full global blackout'''. [[Special:Contributions/212.247.249.162|212.247.249.162]] ([[User talk:212.247.249.162|talk]]) 13:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Filiprem|Filiprem]] ([[User talk:Filiprem|talk]]) 11:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Signalkraft|Signalkraft]] ([[User talk:Signalkraft|talk]]) 12:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. As much as I hate to make others suffer for a U.S. issue, the reality is many U.S. websites that could be affected by this bill have a vast global reach, like Wikipedia, and as such the entire world needs to understand the severity of the situation [[User:Otebig|Otebig]] ([[User talk:Otebig|talk]]) 12:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/76.183.170.100|76.183.170.100]] ([[User talk:76.183.170.100|talk]]) 12:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 
#'''Support'''. [[User:Zaijaj|Zaijaj]] ([[User talk:Zaijaj|talk]]) 12:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' - shut her down until Obama grows some hair on his balls and rips SOPA.--'''[[User:Milowent|Milowent]]''' • [[Special:Contributions/Milowent|has]][[User talk:Milowent|spoken]] 12:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''.World-wide awareness needed - Go global --[[User:Keamari|Keamari]] ([[User talk:Keamari|talk]]) 12:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Global problem that needs global pressure -- [[User:Makomk|makomk]] ([[User talk:Makomk|talk]]) 12:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. It needs to be done. Global is the best decision. [[User:LowSelfEstidle|LowSelfEstidle]] ([[User talk:LowSelfEstidle|talk]]) 12:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. [[User:Simon.hess|Simon.hess]] ([[User talk:Simon.hess|talk]]) 12:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. People all around the world must be aware of this. [[User:Petru Dimitriu|Petru Dimitriu]] ([[User talk:Petru Dimitriu|talk]]) 12:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -[[User:Djsasso|DJSasso]] ([[User talk:Djsasso|talk]]) 13:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Tom Meijer|Tom Meijer]] ([[User talk:Tom Meijer|talk]]) 13:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Rockoprem|ROCKOPREM]][[User_talk:Rockoprem|talk]] 13:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''.--[[User:Danidvt|Danidvt]] ([[User talk:Danidvt|talk]]) 13:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. (a)As per argument number 1 in this subsection, US has been the big brother (for the better or for worse) in influencing the freedom of expression in many nations all over the world and SOPA will have a wide impact. (b) What happens in any nation is every other nation's business. [[User:Staticd|Staticd]] ([[User talk:Staticd|talk]]) 13:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''.—[[User:EmilJ|Emil]] [[User talk:EmilJ|J.]] 13:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:ZorbaTHut|ZorbaTHut]] ([[User talk:ZorbaTHut|talk]]) 14:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. When a major world super power that has been founded in and has exhibited freedom since its creation attempts to pass a bill censoring the internet, this is obviously big news, and can set an example for other countries. This should be a worldwide blackout. Also, Americans could easily bypass the blackout through proxies if the blackout was US only. [[User:Qmwnebrvtcyxuz|Qmwnebrvtcyxuz]] ([[User talk:Qmwnebrvtcyxuz|talk]]) 14:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. In Italy, the blackout already worked. Do it again! Angros47, from Italy. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Angros47|Angros47]] ([[User talk:Angros47|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Angros47|contribs]]) 14:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 
#'''Support'''. This affects everyone, and SOPA certainly won't be the end of it. [[User:CP\M|CP/M]] [[User talk:CP\M|comm]] |[[WP:WNP|Wikipedia Neutrality Project]]| 14:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I live in America and India. I think communities in both of those places should be concerned about the global interconnectivity of this issue. Other countries should participate more in American politics since America is participating in theirs. [[User:Bluerasberry|''' Blue Rasberry ''']][[User talk:Bluerasberry|(talk)]] 14:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:Olei|Olei]] ([[User talk:Olei|talk]]) 14:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' The US does not own the internet, nor should it have exclusive control. This and other similar acts affect everyone around the globe. [[User:Bromeliad39|Bromeliad39]] ([[User talk:Bromeliad39|talk]]) 14:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Although this is technically an issue for the US at this point, if the SOPA passes and goes into effect, it will end up becoming a global issue. The more awareness we can bring to this, the better. [[User:mayelisa]] —Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|undated]] comment added 14:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC). 
# '''Support'''. Prefer this to option 1 by a small margin. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 14:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Passing SOPA sets a precedent for more censorship and other countries will most definately follow suit. [[User:AlphaGENERIC|AlphaGENERIC]] 14:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. -- [[User:Cobi|Cobi]]([[User talk:Cobi|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cobi|c]]|[[User:ClueBot Commons/Bots|b]]) 14:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - I think a global ''English'' blackout is preferable, not just to those who geolocate to the US. So I suppose somewhere between this option and option 1? Of the two, this is my preferred. [[User:Resolute|Reso]][[User Talk:Resolute|lute]] 14:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Zinnmann|Zinnmann]] ([[User talk:Zinnmann|talk]]) 14:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''STRONGLY Support'''. [[User:Modi mode|Modi mode]] ([[User talk:Modi mode|talk]]) 14:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''.--[[User:Lpmfx|Lpmfx]] ([[User talk:Lpmfx|talk]]) 14:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Once USA does it, that sets a ''very'' dangerous precedent. We must ensure that this kind of law is widely unpopular throughout the entire world while we still can, to make it politically infeasible. [[User:Romanski|Romanski]] ([[User talk:Romanski|talk]]) 14:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#[[User:Migdejong|Migdejong]] ([[User talk:Migdejong|talk]]) 15:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Internet regulation in USA affects the entire world. Other peoples may at least indirectly influence actions taken because of this initiative. Also, I agree with the decision of other organizations about the action in the first place and think a real impact depends on a larger set of organizations helping them. Finally, this should reach a majority of Internet users. ----[[User:Hdante|hdante]] ([[User talk:Hdante|talk]]) 15:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' （支持） Freedom Internet is voice worldwide. （互联网自由是来自全世界的声音。）We Chinese have a idiom "惟恐天下不乱", which means block globally may work. --[[User:王小朋友|王小朋友]] ([[User talk:王小朋友|talk]]) 14:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Minoru-kun|Minoru-kun]] ([[User talk:Minoru-kun|talk]]) 15:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Leastfixedpoint|Leastfixedpoint]] ([[User talk:Leastfixedpoint|talk]]) 15:38, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. -- [[User:RoySmith|RoySmith]] [[User Talk:RoySmith|(talk)]] 15:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Endlessdan|Endlessdan]] ([[User talk:Endlessdan|talk]]) 15:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Sfaugue1|Sfaugue1]] ([[User talk:Sfaugue1|talk]]) 16:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC) If this bill gets passed, the course for a smooth worldly future will indeed be compromised. This bill will effect the whole world, it doesn't just affect Americans.
#'''Support'''. Decisions of the US-government will (still) affect politics and industry around the world, so let's show people that they need a free (as in speech) worldwide internet! [[User:BNemsi|BNemsi]] ([[User talk:BNemsi|talk]]) 16:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:JimmyX|JimmyX]] ([[User talk:JimmyX|talk]]) 16:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- it's a global issue, as decisions in one jurisdiction will affect the experience of people in another. Besides, if it "works" in the US, lobbyists in other countries will rush to follow. SOPA, PIPA, whatever -- it needs to be stopped, not just tabled.--[[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan (talk)]] 16:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Scottman1995|SCottman1995]] ([[User talk:Scottman1995|talk]]) 16:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Wolbo|Wolbo]] ([[User talk:Wolbo|talk]]) 16:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. What is done legislatively to the internet by the United States will have an effect on the rest of the world. --[[User:Dennisthe2|'''Dennis The Tiger''']] ([[User talk:Dennisthe2|Rawr]] and [[Special:Contributions/Dennisthe2|stuff]]) 17:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Azoreg|Azoreg]] ([[User talk:Azoreg|talk]]) 17:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== (3) Blackout and banner both US only =====
#Support enwiki only, limited to users geo-located to the United States. Oppose "banner component would display to all users, regardless of location" [[User:Bulwersator|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator|talk]]) 18:49, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#: '''Oppose''' (1), (2), (4). I don't want propaganda about something happening in the US cluttering my usage of Wikipedia. [Editor's note: assuming 3, 5, or 6 are okay with Peter]. --[[User:Peter cohen|Peter cohen]] ([[User talk:Peter cohen|talk]]) 19:43, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# No clear preference for 3, 5 or 6, that's up to US editors to decide, I'm opposed to anything affecting non US users per my previous comments, the evidence for this having much if a direct effect on wikipedia is limited so I don't see any reason why we should do this for all users as opposed to say for the Spanish law or any of the other laws out there. [[User:Nil Einne|Nil Einne]] ([[User talk:Nil Einne|talk]]) 20:51, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - Perhaps there are better times for other locations. Should happen when there is an actionable item available for local government. [[User:Daniel.Cardenas|Daniel.Cardenas]] ([[User talk:Daniel.Cardenas|talk]]) 01:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - I support a full blackout with banners in the US only. Would support (1.2.1.1), or (1.2.1.2) if enough (majority?) non-US users felt comfortable having a blackout or banner. [[User:Dkreisst|Dkreisst]] ([[User talk:Dkreisst|talk]]) 04:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# Support US only, for this, but I don't agree with EN: only. Apparently Americans only speak English? I don't think so. Anglophone-centrism not much better than Americentrism. Re what Nil Einne said, WP ought to do this for other laws, in other countries -- like UK's recent law that does pretty much the same as SOPA! - [[User:KeithTyler|Keith D. Tyler]] [[User_talk:KeithTyler|¶]] 07:18, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# ...[[User:Sicherlich|Sicherlich]] [[:de:Benutzer Diskussion:Sicherlich|Post]] 10:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:YMS|YMS]] ([[User talk:YMS|talk]]) 11:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#:'''Object''' to voters being asked to not oppose some options while other options have oppose sections. This makes interpreting the results a matter of comparing apples and oranges. '''Object''' to misleading title; it is called "''Blackout and banner for US only''" but the description text makes it clear that it isn't a blackout at all. I oppose the "banner portion of this option on the grounds that a clicktrough banner without an actual blackout will be perceived as not joining the other sites that have actual blackouts. I oppose the US only portion of this option on the grounds that the copyright industry is pushing similar legislation in multiple countries. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 14:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#::There was already a weeks-long straw poll on "do something" with 89.9% support. It's perfectly legitimate for the WMF to ask "ok, what?" [[User:Selery|Selery]] ([[User talk:Selery|talk]]) 15:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#:::The above comment appears to be unrelated to my objections. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 17:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. It's a US issue; I think we should focus on potential US voters. Only a tiny sliver of Anglophones outside the US are US expats. Keith D. Tyler makes a good point about other US languages, but I don't know where the debate or process stands on that point. --[[User:Amcbride|Allen]] ([[User talk:Amcbride|talk]]) 18:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' U.S. issue --[[User:Aflafla1|Aflafla1]] ([[User talk:Aflafla1|talk]]) 19:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. The US should know what going on with Wikipedia and SOPA, but the rest of the world doesn't really care, in my opinion. [[User:Chevsapher|Chevsapher]] ([[User talk:Chevsapher|talk]]) 20:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' So far it is US only. Few Americans recognize how dangerous this legislation is. We could be headed toward at worst a secret police enforcing copyright laws or at best exacting a private tax on anyone who uses copyrighted materials unknowingly without recognizing that one is using them. One could get slapped a $10 fine or tax for singing [[Happy Birthday]] at a birthday party. Because America is on the way to becoming a plutocratic oligarchy, anything is possible -- including the copyrighting of information itself on the ground that the first to discover knowledge is the only one with the right to disclose it. [[Fair use]], which paradoxically makes copyrighted materials more valuable to a copyright owner and creates more material suitable for copyright, could also be at risk. Copyright should reasonably protect a copyright-holder from a blatant infringement (like downloading a whole feature film or book under copyright -- for gain or not) but it should never become an excuse for corporate control (a/k/a censorship) of culture. [[User:Pbrower2a|Pbrower2a]] ([[User talk:Pbrower2a|talk]]) 21:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. USA issue, not global. [[User:Pinkmango00|-SharonT]] ([[User talk:Pinkmango00|talk]]) 23:02, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. This is a USA only issue. We should not extend the application of this law to outside users. They will not be affected by SOPA, so they should not be affected by the protest. [[User:jtumbaco5|JohnT]] ([[User talk:jtumbaco5|talk]]) 23:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' No harm can happen to society or Wikipedia from a one day block, but massive harm can happen if the bills pass. However, there's no need to get other countries involved with a block. U.S. wikipedia would not shut down for some other countries' objectionable law. [[User:Wxidea|Wxidea]] ([[User talk:Wxidea|talk]]) 02:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' This seems the most sensible option; I oppose all international "blackout" options. {{[[User:Nihiltres|Nihiltres]]|[[User talk:Nihiltres|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Nihiltres|edits]]|[[WP:03|⚡]]}} 06:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', users outside the United States have no real way of influencing US legislative moves, so it makes no sense to inconvenience them. [[User:Lankiveil|Lankiveil]] ([[User talk:Lankiveil|speak to me]]) 09:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC).
#'''Support'''. In fact I would be in favor of a global blackout and banner, but I do not think that the community here in the English Wikipedia should overrule communities of Wikipedias in other languages where other decisions may be made, and where only a part of the respective community is able to follow English-language discussion at all. [[User:Gestumblindi|Gestumblindi]] ([[User talk:Gestumblindi|talk]]) 19:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC) P.S. I'm not sure whether the "global blackout" is intended to apply only to the English-language Wikipedia anyway; if yes, then I would agree. [[User:Gestumblindi|Gestumblindi]] ([[User talk:Gestumblindi|talk]]) 22:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''.I think Wikipedia should join this "project" beacause Wikipedia is an important site and have the power to move something.[[User:Abol65|Abol65]] ([[User talk:Abol65|talk]]) 21:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Piratejosh85|Piratejosh85]] ([[User talk:Piratejosh85|talk]]) 23:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. It pains me to argue for ANY cessation of service on Wikipedia, but it is such a heavily visited site that a blackout will be INCREDIBLY conspicuous. Wikipedia ostensibly has a vested interest in seeing this defeated as well. So long as the blackout is '''short''' and has an predetermined, '''fixed''' termination date, I think the obstruction of information exchange is tolerably slight.
#'''Support'''. [[User:Wikiwooster|Wikiwooster]] ([[User talk:Wikiwooster|talk]]) 00:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Wikiwooster}}
#'''Support'''. Thank you so much for considering this. It's going to make a HUGE difference. In other news, I am panic-downloading offline wikipedia. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/129.74.118.249|129.74.118.249]] ([[User talk:129.74.118.249|talk]]) 13:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 

===== (4) No blackout, global banner =====
# <s>'''Support''' '''-[[User:Download|down]][[User talk:Download|load]] ׀ [[User talk:Download|talk]]''' 00:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)</s> Moving to support of blackout '''-[[User:Download|down]][[User talk:Download|load]] ׀ [[User talk:Download|talk]]''' 19:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Very Strong Support'''--[[User:LeslieCarr|LeslieCarr]] ([[User talk:LeslieCarr|talk]]) 20:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - Wikipedia claims to be opposed to copyright violations. If they are, then they should support the SOPA bill instead of protesting it. ←[[User:Baseball Bugs|Baseball Bugs]] ''[[User talk:Baseball Bugs|What's up, Doc?]]'' [[Special:Contributions/Baseball_Bugs|carrots]]→ 02:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#::'''Comment''' - No Bugs SOPA will do more than stop copyright violations, it will stifle our freedom of speech! --[[User:Lerdthenerd|Lerdthenerd ]][[User talk:Lerdthenerd#top|wiki defender]] 21:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#:::There is no freedom at speech at en wikipedia. Freedom of speech is irrelevant to creating articles by reporting what reliable sources have reported. If you are worried about your freedom of speech please do not used en wikipedia to vocalize your personal issues. - [[User:Youreallycan | '''Youreallycan''']] 21:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#:::: I'm talking about wikipedia's, this is just like a massive superinjunction if SOPA passes congress will be able to dictate what information we can and can't have on here!--[[User:Lerdthenerd|Lerdthenerd ]][[User talk:Lerdthenerd#top|wiki defender]] 21:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#::'''Comment''' - Does Wikipedia actually claim to oppose copyright violations? As far as I know, Wikipedia does not have a published stance on copyright violations; they are removed for legal reasons, not because of Wikipedia's stance on them. To say nothing about how most opposition to SOPA is unrelated to copyright violation. --[[User:Zarel|''Zarel'']] ([[User talk:Zarel|talk]]⋅[[Special:Contributions/Zarel|c]]) 00:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#:::'''Comment''' Read the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Legal_overview legal review] from Geoff Brigham, General counsel for the Wikimedia Foundation. Wikipedia strongly opposes copyright violations, and equally strongly opposes SOPA. It's obvious that original commenter hasn't read that legal review, or he/she would not say "if you opposed copyright violations, you would support SOPA." That argument is analogous to saying, "If you opposed terrorists, you would support killing all Muslims." One has nothing to do with the other. -[[User:Jhortman|Jhortman]] ([[User talk:Jhortman|talk]]) 17:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - Not really sold on the blackout idea and definitely oppose a full black out. That said, the SOPA and related bills have much farther-reaching consequences than just to the U.S. Think a banner is warranted for all users. Banners ''DO'' work and can be effective at reaching a lot of people. -- [[User:JoannaSerah|JoannaSerah]] ([[User talk:JoannaSerah|talk]]) 05:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - I'm also not sold on the blackout idea, but putting a banner up that explains what this legislation will do is an important education tool. A banner can describe the implications of this legislation for sites, such as Wikimedia.[[User:Wpollard|Bill Pollard]] ([[User talk:Wpollard|talk]]) 13:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - Effective enough without the annoyance. [[User:Rodri316|Rodri316]] ([[User talk:Rodri316|talk]]) 14:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I also left an opposing comment to a [[#Full blackout|full blackout]] below. I think a banner will suffice to all users. It's important to let everyone (worldwide) know about the situtation, however, I don't think a blackout or click-thru will really help, it will just be irritating to those using the site, and may backfire. --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 17:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#"Support"-Banners brought me to this sight, banners work.
#'''Support'''. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 20:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:ZipoBibrok5x10^8|ZipoBibrok5x10^8]] ([[User talk:ZipoBibrok5x10^8|talk]]) 05:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I don't think SOPA is bad enough to justify a blackout.. Banner should make it clear that it's a U.S. law that's being protested against, but it would have global effect and other countries are considering similar laws. Cheers WMF for advertising this poll to all editors! [[User:Eug|eug]] ([[User talk:Eug|talk]]) 08:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Banner at first, then (eventually) blackout. [[User:AnjaQantina|AnjaQantina]] ([[User talk:AnjaQantina|talk]]) 09:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' A blackout wouldn't help Wikipedia, but a banner would really help the many readers know that SOPA exists. [[User:What a pro.|What a pro.]] ([[User talk:What a pro.|talk]]) 11:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly support''' [[User:Maaa9998|Maaa9998]] ([[User talk:Maaa9998|talk]]) 12:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I do see the reasons for (6), and would support that over blackout, but I think having GLOBAL banner, with option to click for further information is the best option. [[User:Vik-Thor|VikÞor]] | [[User talk:Vik-Thor|Talk]] 17:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' or, alternatively, (1), (2), (5), (3) in order of preference from most to least favorite. [[User:Jamface1|Jamface1]] ([[User talk:Jamface1|talk]]) 17:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''strongly support''' a blackout may be unnecessary, since a banner might be just as effective in educating people. [[User:Jhortman|Jhortman]] ([[User talk:Jhortman|talk]]) 17:34, 15 January 2012‎ (UTC)
#'''Support''' - blackout may be unnecessary and may anger people. Big banner is sufficient. [[User:ShotmanMaslo|ShotmanMaslo]] ([[User talk:ShotmanMaslo|talk]]) 13:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - Banners are the most effective. Dont think blackouts would be the right thing to do right now. [[User:Amaltash|Amaltash]] ([[User talk:Amaltash|talk]]) 20:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' The banner must be Global - such a law in the US could very well have a major effect on the entire world in regards to Wikipedia, and other websites ... in addition, the banner should be on every page of Wikipedia, at all the sister sites - with no option for the user to remove it during the action. [[User:PoizonMyst|PoizonMyst]] ([[User talk:PoizonMyst|talk]]) 14:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== (5) No blackout, banner US only =====
# '''Support''' - Blackout is too radical for an important website as Wikipedia. Make it a very well visible banner with a clear message that only states that if SOPA passes, WP might have to censor articles or shut down completely. Blocking out access for a full day to millions of people seeking free information would not be a good idea. [[User:Riddergraniet|Riddergraniet]] ([[User talk:Riddergraniet|talk]]) 12:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' This legislation is only taking place in the US, and many non-US users are not interested in fighting the so-called SOPA. A blackout is very likely to hit Wikipedia's image harder than SOPA's; the majority of the userbase, I believe, will read a blackout as site downtime. [[User:AUN4|AUN4]] ([[User talk:AUN4|talk]]) 03:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
## '''Comment''' - In Russia, for instance, SOPA is given very good coverage as it will affect everyone on the Internet. We're interested, we really are. --[[User:Anthony Ivanoff|Anthony Ivanoff]] ([[User talk:Anthony Ivanoff|talk]]) 10:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#It won't really help for people on other continents and in other countries to pester US legislators' offices with comments because they aren't even part of that legislator's jurisdiction. A blackout is also a waste of time because it doesn't change anything. The best method is to call readers to call their Congressional leaders. '''/[[User:Fetchcomms|ƒETCH]][[User talk:Fetchcomms|COMMS]][[Special:Contributions/Fetchcomms|/]]''' 05:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
## SOPA will affect everyone on earth. No matter if other people are in the jurisdiction, the US is claiming jurisdiction of users accessing US-based websites. Everyone will be affected, everyone should be notified of the possible consequences. [[User:Jurjenb|Jurjenb]] ([[User talk:Jurjenb|talk]]) 13:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' A banner calling attention to a Wikipedia article on the issue is the most Wikipedia should do. There is more heat than light coming from the anti-SOPA camp and Wikipedia shouldn't get swept up into the hype. Also, as a number of other people have pointed out, Wikipedia would be violating its NPOV policy if it openly advocated a political cause on its site. [[User:ProfGiles|ProfGiles]] ([[User talk:ProfGiles|talk]]) 18:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' I agree. I have seen other websites do this in response to SOPA, and I think it would be the most effective way to get the message accross. We can still keep the website open for people's use, but spread awareness at the same time. [[User:Samcashion|Samcashion]] ([[User talk:Samcashion|talk]]) 21:01, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:WikiCopter|W]][[User talk:WikiCopter|i]][[Special:EmailUser/WikiCopter|k]][[Special:Contributions/WikiCopter|i]][[User:AirplanePro/Articles|C]][[w:simple:User:Wikicopter|o]][[commons:User:WikiCopter|p]][[User:AirplanePro|t]][[WP:MIL|e]][[WP:AIR|r]] 00:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' This issue is only in America, and isn't very relevant to other nations. Also, a full blackout would more likely irritate neutral people on the issue. Therefore, a banner could alert users of the issue without infringing on their viewing. [[Special:Contributions/173.188.59.151|173.188.59.151]] ([[User talk:173.188.59.151|talk]]) 01:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' This is an political issue limited to the U.S. and blacking Wikipedia out, for those not yet concerned about SOPA, will likely only be seen as an unexpected outage. For those that are concerned about SOPA, Wikipedia's probably the first place for many of them to get the detail they want/need. Furthermore, Wikimedia should not suspend its service to make a political point, no matter how deserving. Wikimedia (and especially Wikipedia) is so valued ''because'' it doesn't take sides in disputes (even though, at times, it provides a rather public forum for supporters in those disputes). Blacking Wikipedia out would do more damage to its perceived impartiality than any benefit that could possibly come from it. [[User:Mcornelius|mcornelius]] ([[User talk:Mcornelius|talk]]) 02:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - I don't like the idea of a blackout, especially a full blackout, but think a banner discussing the issue is fine. '''[[User:Dough4872|Dough]][[User talk:Dough4872|48]][[Special:Contributions/Dough4872|72]]''' 02:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - Wikipedia has become an essential source of information for many people. I don't think it is right to penalize these users with a blackout. We need to think of our users and stick with a banner at most. Also, SOPA is a U.S. issue and impacting the rest of the world is narcissistic.--[[User:Rpclod|Rpclod]] ([[User talk:Rpclod|talk]]) 14:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Madalino|Madalino]] ([[User talk:Madalino|talk]]) 14:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This is the only 'action' item that makes any sense. This bill a) only affects the US, b) hasn't actually been passed yet and c) is no worse than censorship regimes in other countries (including English-speaking countries) which have no attracted any protest from Wikipedia. Any protest at all is a bad idea, because it brings Wikipedia into local politics, rather than remaining neutral. But if any protest at all is made, it should be no more than a banner, to avoid punishing users who have absolutely nothing to do with this bill. Extending any protest whatsoever beyond US users is stupid and will only serve to tarnish the reputation of both Wikipedia and Wikimedia, whilst re-enforcing the impression that both are dominated by Americo-centricism and pro-US bias. [[User:Modest Genius|Modest Genius]] [[User_talk:Modest Genius|talk]] 17:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Oh, the blackout will only be in the US anyway. Go to town with it, I really don't care. Wikipedia should not be a soapbox and get involved in politics. You want to hassle your fellow Americans, go for it. The rest of the world moves on. Honestly, what can an non-US resident do to stop the bill? There is also a bill in India where they can sue websites such as facebook that are critical of the government there, but we don't seem to care about it here... And Wikipedia is licensed under the CC-by-sa, so if worse comes to worse, we just mirror it elsewhere. Problem solved, SOPA or no SOPA. [[User:Oaktree b|Oaktree b]] ([[User talk:Oaktree b|talk]]) 01:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Put in a banner which parses at a user's IP and links to their likely Senators, for instance [http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm?State=CA my California Senators] so that people have an easy link to send a message to their Senators. (House reps would be too difficult to match with IP's.) [[User:Banaticus|Banaticus]] ([[User talk:Banaticus|talk]]) 10:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:ClarkF1|ClarkF1]] ([[User talk:ClarkF1|talk]]) 15:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== (6) No blackout and no banner =====
# '''Support''' Any blackout as not being in the long-term best interest of Wikipedia and related projects. [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 18:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - at this time. [[User:Youreallycan | '''Youreallycan''']] 19:19, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - Keep out of politics, [[WP:SOAP]]. --[[User:Pgallert|Pgallert]] ([[User talk:Pgallert|talk]]) 21:14, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - Ditto [[User:PatheticCopyEditor|PatheticCopyEditor]] ([[User talk:PatheticCopyEditor|talk]]) 18:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - for now. --[[User:AbigailAbernathy|Abigail was here :D]] [[User talk:AbigailAbernathy|Talk to Me.]] [[Special:EmailUser/AbigailAbernathy|Email Me.]] 00:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - let us be the 'bigger man' by not flinching to this. May we keep always a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]]. [[User:Arbitrarily0|<big>A</big>rbitrarily<big>0</big>]] ([[User talk:Arbitrarily0|talk]]) 05:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. There are many worthy causes in the world, but [[WP:SOAP|Wikipedia is not a soapbox]]. Taking this action would permanently politicize Wikipedia, and others and I have endeavored to explain in the previous discussions of this issue. [[User:Lagrange613|Lagrange]][[User talk:Lagrange613#top|613]] 07:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Although I strongly feel about this topic, we should not choose side in political debates, NPOV should not only be a guideline in our articles. Teun Spaans ([[User_talk:TeunSpaans|talk]]) 07:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Flies in the face of [[WP:NPOV]] even though it's not technically in the article namespace, there is an article on the bill that looks less neutral if there's a blackout. --[[User:Jtalledo|Jtalledo]] [[User talk:Jtalledo|(talk)]] 15:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' Damages our much coveted neutrality, and frankly I'm not sure if I want to continue volunteering for a project overseen by a group which role seems to have changed over the years from it's formation - starting out as a means to handle press enquiries, manage funds and the technical side of things, to the one that now seems to be acting as some sort of political advocacy group. Harms our public image as well - keep Wikipedia out of politics! [[User:Acather96|Acather96]] ([[User talk:Acather96|talk]]) 16:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Let's stick to the Foundation's mission and continue sharing information while remaining apolitical. [[User:Denverjeffrey|Jeffrey Beall]] [[User talk:Denverjeffrey|(talk)]] 16:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a political action group. We will be unable to claim with good faith that we are an objective source of information if we tie ourselves to specific positions, and especially ones that are mere stunts with no practical purpose. Most of the claims made about SOPA are simply misinformed to begin with. Save whatever point-making gestures we have up our sleeves for something that has a real point to it. [[User:DreamGuy|DreamGuy]] [[User talk:DreamGuy|(talk)]] 19:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I object to any organization that solicits contributions and donations for one purpose and then uses its resources and influences to promote one side of a political issue. The Wikipedia SOPA article should present the facts in a neutral manner as is the goal with any other topic. Beyond that and perhaps a passing in-the-news reference, that should be the limit to coverage on Wikipedia proper. A press release by the foundation in the expected or ''likely'' effects of SOPA on Wikipedia may be appropriate, but I would hope that even that would not attempt to use [[Daisy (advertisement)|fear mongering]] tactics. -- [[User:Tcncv|'''''Tom N''''' (tcncv)]] [[User talk:Tcncv|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Tcncv|contrib]] 19:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' WP is a non-profit organization, it should not be making political statements, there is enough activism on WP the way it is already. [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel|talk]]) 19:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Very strong support''' - While I am not personally against the WMF taking a political stand on this issue and even recruiting or hiring lobbyists that would represent them before the U.S. Congress, and certainly organizing volunteers and editors to petition their local representatives in America or elsewhere to take a stand on this issue, I think a blackout sends the wrong message. There are better ways to get this accomplished without trying to make the WMF look like a bunch of political nut cases. Maintaining the neutrality of Wikipedia is important, even on an issue like this. If anything, it was unfortunate that it.wikipedia pulled this stunt, and I'm not convinced that it is time yet to do a similar action here for en.wikipedia. --[[User:Robert Horning|Robert Horning]] ([[User talk:Robert Horning|talk]]) 19:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' - Wikipedia and the Wikimedia Foundation should be neutral in any and all political matters. Neutrality is very much valued on here and if either Wikipedia or Wikimedia Foundation takes a stand on political issues, it loses its platform on which to be a legitimate and trustworthy source of unbiased, encyclopedic information. [[User:Illegitimate Barrister|Illegitimate Barrister]] ([[User talk:Illegitimate Barrister|talk]]) 23:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - Absolutely not the right thing to do. I have absolutely no belief that this will make a difference, and honestly, it goes against all the neutrality policies. Mitch32([[User:Mitchazenia|Never support those]] [[User talk:Mitchazenia|who think in the box]]) 02:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly support'''. Wikipedia just got done asking for donations, one reason of which is that Wikipedia self proclaimed 'advertisements do not belong here'. Don't get me wrong, I oppose SOPA but Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral ground, and should follow the same policies that articles must be written in. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. An encyclopedia with political favoring is propaganda, intentional or not. We need to hold constant the values of neutrality that Wikipedia preaches.[[User:552Industries|552Industries]] ([[User talk:552Industries|talk]]) 03:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' - Wikipedia has not and should not participate in the game of politics. '''[[WP:NOTADVOCATE]]'''. While I do feel SOPA is an absolutely horrible idea that will be of little benefit, by getting involved we only hurt ourselves. There is little to gain through any participation across the Wikimedia projects. If anything, it will only hurt the users of Wikipedia while having little to no impact on the decision making in regards to SOPA. [[User:Slazenger|'''--Slazenger''']] ([[User talk:Slazenger|Contact Me]]) 03:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' with enormous reluctance. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not anyone's personal army. Wikipedia is also an encyclopedia; is Britannica organizing a protest on its American site? We have articles to write, and edits to make, and ignorance to battle...which transcends politics. Finally, this reads like an enormous piece of groupthink, which creates an anti-intellectualism all its own.....and that's the last thing we need. Everyone, put down the Kool-Aid. A blackout of any sort is an escalation; save the nuclear options, please. Once the blackout genie is out of the bottle, there will be more demands for blackouts....and if I wanted to join an army, I would. I also reserve the right to change my opinion. [[User:Ezratrumpet|Ezratrumpet]] ([[User talk:Ezratrumpet|talk]]) 04:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I do not believe Wikipedia should take political sides. Also it appears that SOPA may be less of a concern, today Saturday than it was yesterday Friday as the President's office has come out opposed to it, Mr. Lamar Alexander has backed down from some of the most controversial aspects, and the cosponsor of the bill from Vermont says it needs more study.[[User:Ellin Beltz|Ellin Beltz]] ([[User talk:Ellin Beltz|talk]]) 04:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support'''. It is not Wikipedia's place to be playing politics, and this is, by definition, a political issue. If the fundamental freedoms of Americans are being harmed by this legislation then it is a matter for the courts to revoke, just like any other issue. While the Wikimedia Foundation's mandate does include the promotion of open source (thus opposition to this bill might be within that mandate), that is ''not'' the mandate of Wikipedia itself. Wikipedia should ''never'' be used as a tool for ''any'' political purpose, including as directed by the Wikimedia Foundation. -'''[[User:M.nelson|M.Nelson]]''' ([[User talk:M.nelson|talk]]) 07:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongest Possible Support''' - SOPA is pretty poor policy, and I've written my Congressman about it, but any action would threaten our neutrality; I can't support the Project, the Community, or the Foundation to be involved in a political discussion. Remember, this is an encyclopedia, start and end. [[User:Achowat|Achowat]] ([[User talk:Achowat|talk]]) 07:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Hchc2009|Hchc2009]] ([[User talk:Hchc2009|talk]]) 08:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support'''. Wikipedia should keep out of political issues. I don't see how denying the service to uninvolved third parties for a day will help here. I believe it is right to make a stand in defence of Wikipedia's neutrality. I would like to make this stand here and now on the discussion of this very first potential blackout incident. I would not like see the reputation of this project to be tarnished, which could happen particularly if further blackouts are organised. We have to look at the bigger picture here and to me this is the start of a very slippery slope. Wikipedia has become very powerful, perhaps too powerful. It is tempting to use this power for political ends, but really this does conflict with the core goals of the project. In any case, it is more noble to keep the service up and running, come what may. [[User:Rept0n1x|Rept0n1x]] ([[User talk:Rept0n1x|talk]]) 09:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support'''. Many users who encounter a blackout or a banner are going to conclude that Wikipedia has a liberal bias, and that particular form of liberal bias which is more concerned about "western" governments than regimes elsewhere that have been far less friendly to freedom of information. Using Wikipedia as a soapbox or suspending it is... suspending Wikipedia. It's "[[We had to destroy the village to save it]]" logic and what's especially headshaking about it is that supposed friends of the village want to do REAL damage in order to battle HYPOTHETICAL enemy damage. If, with no small indulgence, we granted that [[WP:NPOV]] could potentially be suspended by engaging in advocacy, it'd be when an authority has specially ordered Wikipedia to do something explicitly contrary to one of Wikipedia's pillar policies. This is not remotely close to such a case. You let someone hoist a flag on Wikipedia this time and soon there will be someone else proposing another day of advocacy about some other real or imagined legislation in some jurisdiction that maybe by some chance could constrain Wikipedia more than it would constrain itself anyway. You're going to deal with all those calls to political action by asking for another show of hands? Let Jimbo Wales and the WMF do their advocacy in the media as Wikimedia representatives. It is an entirely different thing to find advocacy where neutrality should be (i.e. on wikipedia.org).--[[User:Bdell555|Brian Dell]] ([[User talk:Bdell555|talk]]) 10:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' per comment number 8, 10, 12, 13, 18, 22, 25 and 26. --[[User:G(x)|G(x)]] ([[User talk:G(x)|talk]]) 11:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Dr.wadsworth|Dr.wadsworth]] ([[User talk:Dr.wadsworth|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Dr.wadsworth|contribs]]) 12:10, 15 January 2012
#'''Support''' Wikipedia probably isn't the right place for political activism. It will make people think that Wikipedia is biased. --[[User:Joshua Issac|Joshua Issac]] ([[User talk:Joshua Issac|talk]]) 12:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' - as I've already commented elsewhere, I don't think Wikipedia should be engaging in political advocacy, and I think doing so undermines our core value of neutrality. Taking any kind of action on SOPA would be the beginning of a dangerous slippery slope. [[User:Robofish|Robofish]] ([[User talk:Robofish|talk]]) 13:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' Wikipedia is for unbiased information, not to take political stances. Furthermore the world doesn't revolve around the US so nobody outside of the US should be remotely affected, especially not through Wikipedia. Nevertheless any form of protest will go against everything Wikipedia stands for. [[User:EquestrianAlex|EquestrianAlex]] ([[User talk:EquestrianAlex|talk]]) 13:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' As others have said, Wikipedia is not a political platform, and it especially must not be dominated by a domestic US political issue. Do not let misguided radicalism cause more harm to Wikipedia than SOPA ever could. [[User:Vttoth|vttoth]] ([[User talk:Vttoth|talk]]) 14:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Any action of this sort from Wikipedia's side will undermine the public's perception of Wikipedia as a politically neutral website. [[User:Sjakkalle|Sjakkalle]] [[User talk:Sjakkalle|(Check!)]] 14:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' It's our job, while on Wikipedia, to remain neutral. This means we don't get politically active or protest here. People should protest, but not on Wikipedia.--[[User:Gordonrox24|Gordonrox24]] | [[User_talk:Gordonrox24|''Talk'']] 15:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Firstly this is US centric and secondly it's political. I haven't seen anything that shows that this affects Wikipedia. [[User:JASpencer|JASpencer]] ([[User talk:JASpencer|talk]]) 16:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Why wouldn't we wish to stamp out illegal activity on the Internet? It's about time governments acted responsibly and well done the US for taking a lead! --[[User:Bermicourt|Bermicourt]] ([[User talk:Bermicourt|talk]]) 16:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' Out of scope. It seems someone uses Wikipedia as instrument against that law. Organizers of this nonsense should read and learn [[WP:WWIN|What Wikipedia is not]].--[[User:Bouron|Bouron]] ([[User talk:Bouron|talk]]) 16:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Nev1|Nev1]] ([[User talk:Nev1|talk]]) 17:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:TrebleSeven|TrebleSeven]] ([[User talk:TrebleSeven|talk]]) 18:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. We may as well start endorsing candidates. -[[User:LtNOWIS|LtNOWIS]] ([[User talk:LtNOWIS|talk]]) 18:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' This would no doubt be "aimed at influencing the attitude of a community toward some cause or position so as to benefit oneself or one's group", also known as "[[propaganda]]", which we have [[Wikipedia:NOTADVOCATE#ADVOCATE|a policy stating Wikipedia does not do]]. We also have [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|a policy]] stating "Articles mustn't ''take'' sides, but should ''explain'' the sides". This sounds reasonable to me. How can we be expected to host a neutral article on the bill if we take a stand against it? Will we be expected to take a stand on other issues? Demand relieve of the famine in Africa? Demand release of prisoners of conscience? Take a stand in elections? How will that affect our credibility? The passing of SOPA would by all means be nothing but sad, but if it is, we should just move the servers. I am also a little curious as to how many users supporting Wikimedia involvement actually made an effort themselves to contact their elected members in this matter. --[[User:Bensin|Bensin]] ([[User talk:Bensin|talk]]) 18:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''VERY Strong Support''' If SOPA where passed, many Companies and other websites like google and gameguides would go out of business, or just not be able to operate in the US, causing the internet to virtually become pointless in the US (like only the official webs. for some thing), put many people out of a job (that make a living through something like YouTube, etc.), and make the US in even worse economic (and social) situations. It would also cut profits to companies that operate outside the us (like gaming websites including Minecraft). Overall, SOPA is too obviously a bad idea, and likely intentioned to help big US businesses get more profit (causing the ACTUAL US citizens- in other words not businessmen and not bankers- to suffer). --BryanCB
#'''Support'''. I must object on legal grounds. This is strictly my opinion, and what I say here does not represent any policy or that of the United States Federal Government, as I am not officially any of their spokespeople. This opinion is based strictly on my observations alone. That said, I must point out that your "neutral point of view" is what your non-profit status (governed under Internal Revenue Code Section 503(c)) is based upon. If you go with the blackout and/or banner in any form, your neutral point-of-view is compromised. Newspapers are full of articles in which the Internal Revenue Service revoked an organization's non-profit status for taking actions that have clearly shown a bias and have surrendered their neutrality. I am not saying that it will happen, but I do say that this is the risk you take. While I might or might not agree with the actions of the United States Congress, I must point out the inherent danger of your proposed actions and therefore must oppose them. If you want to make your voice heard, you must not do this through this non-profit organization. You can, however, give your opinions individually to your local congressman (and, in fact, should do so). [[User:Rapierman|Rapierman]] ([[User talk:Rapierman|talk]]) 19:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Henry 20:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' One of Wikipedia's [[WP:5P|five pillars]] is to remain neutral. Dabbing with US politics will harm Wikipedia as we'll be perceived as a politicized, which will severely hurt people's perception of us as a neutral source of information. [[User:Arsenikk|Arsenikk]] [[User_talk:Arsenikk|(talk)]] 21:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I am saddened and aggrieved that some people want to use Wikipedia as a political tool. If people have objections to legislations they should make their protests known by acting as individuals, not by utilising the work that I and thousands of others have done. I am not contributing to Wikipedia to provide anyone with a means to add weight to their opposition to legislation. If you're not happy, write to Congress - you can use [http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h3261/show OpenCongress], or some other means. A handful of vocal editors should not be able to force the closure of a website used by millions. Most users of the site, editors and readers, would not even be aware this discusion is taking place. '''[[User:SilkTork|SilkTork]]''' '''[[User talk:SilkTork|✔Tea time]]''' 22:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:Prodego|''Prodego'']] [[User talk:Prodego|talk]] 22:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# I do not support SOPA. However, I believe that Wikipedia should only take sides in political fights that impact it directly. To do otherwise compromises our objectivity. [[User:Eluchil404|Eluchil404]] ([[User talk:Eluchil404|talk]]) 23:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# Wikipedia should never take political positions. Whatever we feel about the proposal, the project should not be used as an instrument for activism. 23:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', per my comments above. [[User:Modest Genius|Modest Genius]] [[User_talk:Modest Genius|talk]] 23:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', Wikipedia should NEVER take a political side. Yes, I disagree with SOPA, but the entirety of Wikipedia's reputation and work do not exist to add any weight to a political view (even to support my own political view). [[User:Josephs1|Joe Seemiller]] ([[User talk:Josephs1|talk]]) 23:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', Wikipedia should NEVER take a political side. This is a major breach of NPOV! --[[User:Amckern|Amckern]] ([[User talk:Amckern|talk]]) 01:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. And I ask users to take action agaisnt WP turning into a political party-like organization: I have resigned my admin status and stopped editing - [[User:Nabla|Nabla]] ([[User talk:Nabla|talk]]) 01:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' No. Wikipedia did almost nothing (not to mention blackout) when Chinese government blocked it unreasonably. It is ridiculous enough for Wikipedia to get involved with politics. I can't imagine people would want the rest of the world to protest against it. No politics, period.--[[User:Aetherlur|Aetherlur]] ([[User talk:Aetherlur|talk]]) 02:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Aetherlur}}
# I hope I'm entering this in the right place-- no to ANYTHING related to SOPA. We get enough politics and harassment and crap and BS "in here", and some of us are here to write articles without copyvio, not engage in politics. [[User:SandyGeorgia|SandyGeorgia]] ([[User talk:SandyGeorgia|Talk]]) 02:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', Wikipedia should not enter the political fray in any fashion. It represents a slippery slope that erodes the trust and reputation the project has worked hard to establish. [[User:TechnoSymbiosis|TechnoSymbiosis]] ([[User talk:TechnoSymbiosis|talk]]) 02:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Hate the bill, love the neutrality of Wikipedia/Wikimedia. [[User:Decafdyke|Decafdyke]] ([[User talk:Decafdyke|talk]]) 03:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Hot Stop''''''[[User:Hot Stop|U]][[User talk:Hot Stop|T]][[Special:Contributions/Hot Stop|C]]''' 04:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' This is a dumb idea. Wikipedia doesn't need to follow Tumblr. [[User:NYyankees51|NYyankees51]] ([[User talk:NYyankees51|talk]]) 04:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' - Keep NPOV in mind please [[User:Princess Derpy|Princess Derpy]] ([[User talk:Princess Derpy|talk]]) 05:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Very Strong Support''': Wikipedia needs to be non-political, as politics is ''ALWAYS'' biased. This will drive users from us. Please don't get us involved.[[User:GenQuest|GenQuest]] ([[User talk:GenQuest|talk]]) 05:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

# '''Very Strong Support''': Always stay neutral in politics, even if the proposed law affects Wikipedia.[[User:Nicob1984|Nico]] ([[User talk:Nicob1984|talk]]) 08:19, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''This Should be Obvious Support''' There's nothing wrong with the Foundation supporting the Encyclopedia taking a stand. And there's nothing wrong with individual editors taking a stand. The Encyclopedia itself, however, should always remain neutral. Taking a political stance would violate two of Wikipedia's [[WP:5|Five Pillars]] and should be avoided at all costs. --''[[User:Philosopher|Philosopher]]'' [[User talk:Philosopher|Let us reason together.]] 09:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''+1'''. [[User:Jenks24|Jenks24]] ([[User talk:Jenks24|talk]]) 10:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Wikipedia should not take sides like this. --[[User:A3 nm|a3_nm]] ([[User talk:A3 nm|talk]]) 11:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Strongly Support'''. Wikimedia should by no means get involved in politics - it compromises our neutrality so greatly that it cannot be countenanced. SOPA may be a bad idea, but it is not the place of Wikipedia to take sides in a political discussion. Our articles are NPOV, and so should we be as a community. If individual beliefs are allowed to be promoted, who knows where that would lead. Also, I find it very interesting that the Chinese block on wiki resulted in no action, but an American law is worth action. This protest may not represent a worldwide view of the subject.[[User:Pascal yuiop|Pascal]] ([[User talk:Pascal yuiop|talk]]) 11:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Strongly Support'''. Pascal explained it better that I can. [[User:DGtal|DGtal]] ([[User talk:DGtal|talk]]) 12:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' This is a minor bill that will not pass Congress, unless someone can prove otherwise. [[User:Shii|Shii]] [[user_talk:Shii|(tock)]] 12:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# "Support" I concur with Pascal. To demand a neutral perspective from all users and then have the site itself choose sides is not only incongruent with its mission, but it sets a bad precedent. Stay out of politics. [[User:P.s.|P.s.]] ([[User talk:P.s.|talk]]) 17:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

==== Blackout (deprecated) ====
This question has been superseded by the two below. It can still be viewed at [[/BlackoutSection]]. If you voted in this section, please clarify your opinion by voting again in one of the sections below. Your choices are [[Wikipedia:SOPA initiative/Action#Full_blackout|Full blackout]] or [[Wikipedia:SOPA initiative/Action#Soft_blackout|Soft blackout]].
:*could we get some clarification, please about how & why & ''by whom'' the above discussion was "deprecated"? '''AFTER''' so many people have voted... i can't seem to find any information about how this decision was reached? [[User:Lx 121|Lx 121]] ([[User talk:Lx 121|talk]]) 07:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

==== Full blackout ====
Not only present an information click-through page, but close off editing and reading of the entire site. A message explaining Wikipedia's participation in the blackout protest will be displayed instead. The goal to achieve by a full, temporary blackout is to demonstrate to users what it is like to not have information available. Such a strong, immediate response may also have the effect of setting an example to warn politicians worldwide that they could be setting themselves up for humiliating defeat if they suggest similar laws in the future.

'''Note: Most comments in this section seem to mean a global disabling of the site, but it isn't entirely clear. You may wish to specify your preference (US only or global)'''

::''* so, great; in other words, when they (whoever they were?) "deprecated" the original voting question, the new/replacement ballot-question was insufficiently-DaB'd? nice one. don't we need to "deprecate" this vote now too? & draft a properly disambiguated question.'' [[User:Lx 121|Lx 121]] ([[User talk:Lx 121|talk]]) 07:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
:::Did you just remove all those votes? I don't know if that's necessary or even allowed! [[User:yrtneg|--]][[user:yrtneg|'''yrtneg''']] ([[User talk:Yrtneg|talk]]) [[Wikipedia:SOPA initiative/Action|STOP SOPA NOW!]] 15:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Support =====
#'''Support full global blackout'''. If you allow click-through, you are wasting your energy. People need to sit for a day and be truly inconvenienced if you really want to generate media attention, and if you really want people to stop and think about what a free Internet means to them. If they merely see a black screen and click through, most of them will forget about it five minutes later. The choice is yours: it's either click-through: "Huh? Wikipedia's whining about something. Who cares...." or full blackout: "Man, when I can't use the Internet the way I want to, it really messes things up for me." Let's actually make a statement that will be heard. Full blackout. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Skieffer|Skieffer]] ([[User talk:Skieffer|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Skieffer|contribs]]) 16:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 
#'''Support'''. [[Special:Contributions/63.152.72.79|63.152.72.79]] ([[User talk:63.152.72.79|talk]]) 15:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Jmeeter|jmeeter]] ([[User talk:Jmeeter|talk]]) 15:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly support full global blackout''' [[User:Liderian|Liderian]] ([[User talk:Liderian|talk]]) 12:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' - This is a big deal, and it warrants a big reaction [[User:InternetMeme|InternetMeme]] ([[User talk:InternetMeme|talk]]) 08:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout''' - It's now or never. We are protecting the internet for our great grand children right now. Thank you for making a stand.. --[[User:Erasmosis|Erasmosis]] ([[User talk:Erasmosis|talk]]) 05:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full blackout - We need to rise up against the government who think they can do whatever —Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/108.26.67.41|108.26.67.41]] ([[User talk:108.26.67.41|talk]]) 19:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''', I'm glad to see the wikipedia community is taking this threat seriously, I hope enough of us take it seriously enough to make this black-out happen. --[[User:Keithonearth|Keithonearth]] ([[User talk:Keithonearth|talk]]) 05:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support full blackout'''. I support any opposition to more excuses for [[America]] to rob, [[Imprisonment in the United States | imprison]], [[Torture in the United States | torture]], [[:Category:Prisoners murdered in custody | murder]], [[Prison rape in the United States | rape]], [[Methicillin-resistant_Staphylococcus_aureus#Prison_inmates | infect]], etc. Let [[Godzilla]] off his leash and give him a truckload of [[adrenaline]] - no response is too harsh, it is literally going to save lives. (As long as we're not physically hurting anybody, nor advocating it, nor calling for overthrow of the government, nor expressing irreconcilable hatred. I am opposed to [[hate speech]] and [[revolution]]s in general.) [[User:Badon|Badon]] ([[User talk:Badon|talk]]) 03:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#: For all those who think a full blackout is premature, I disagree strongly. The time for action is long before this law is a serious threat and we become desperate. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. The gladiator makes his plan in the arena. The best defense is a good offense. All cultures worldwide have proverbs indicating that waiting to take action until the threat is imminent is a poor strategy. We are educated people because of Wikipedia. We have the power to show the world how strongly we reject SOPA and any other law like it. It is a bad time to go limp and be the softspoken diplomat. We carry a big stick. Wave it around threateningly before you actually need to use it, and we will not only come out victorious, we will do it without a battle. [[User:Badon|Badon]] ([[User talk:Badon|talk]]) 20:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#:: I believe taking a somewhat extreme hard-line as early as possible for only a maximum of 24 hours, or less, will be maximally effective while at the same time minimizing the amount of disruption it causes. I think the normal fund-raising done every year with banners everywhere is cumulatively more disruptive than an isolated, planned, and coordinated blackout for only 1 day. [[User:Badon|Badon]] ([[User talk:Badon|talk]]) 07:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''', This major threat to the Web cannot be ignored. [[User:Mr. Paramecium|Mr. Paramecium]] ([[User talk:Mr. Paramecium|talk]]) 03:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' [[User:Questionkiddo|Questionkiddo]] ([[User talk:Questionkiddo|talk]]) 03:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support full blackout'''--[[User:Limojoe|Limojoe]] ([[User talk:Limojoe|talk]]) 02:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' Let's keep the internet free and open. Wikipedia represents the highest form of these ideals. [[User:Teque5|Teque5]] ([[User talk:Teque5|talk]]) 02:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. Strongly supporting full blackout. [[User:KenEdSmith|KenEdSmith]] ([[User talk:KenEdSmith|talk]]) 16:39, 15 January 2012 (PST){{spa|Kenedsmith}}
#'''Strongly Support'''. Full blackout so that the absence of such a strong force on the Internet can be felt throughout the world. Otherwise it will just pass unnoticed. This is the most important issue that we are facing in the world right now, if we give them this, they will take it and take everything along with it. Strongly supporting full blackout.{{spa|Odaym}}
#'''Support''' US-only, we need to raise awareness among US-citizens of what their government is doing and contact their legislators to stop it.
#'''Support Strong''', Re-affirming my vote above that this should be a full-blackout, not US-only. [[User:Agvulpine|Agvulpine]] ([[User talk:Agvulpine|talk]]) 22:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support Strongly''', How is this not the most important issue facing the world right now? EVERYTHING is under threat. Go full nuclear to reflect our rage! [[User:Genjix|Genjix]] ([[User talk:Genjix|talk]]) 21:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support Strongly'''. [[User:DanWiki2011|DanWiki2011]] ([[User talk:DanWiki2011|talk]]) 19:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support Strongly''' [[User:SLWatson|SLWatson]] ([[User talk:SLWatson|talk]]) 18:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Show solidarity & make the stand now before it's too late to be able to. [[User:Halfabeet|Halfabeet]]
#'''Support''' A bill that has global ramifications should be seen globally. [[User:Rjhancock|rjhancock]] ([[User talk:Rjhancock|talk]]) 16:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' We need a global blackout, as SOPA will affect websites all over the world. --[[User:NimbleJack|NimbleJack]] ([[User talk:NimbleJack|talk]]) 12:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout'''. A global issue and must be addressed globally. These greedy guys are mind-police.
#'''Support'''. [[User:Pigman5|Pigman5]] ([[User talk:Pigman5|talk]]) 05:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:Starfarmer|'''star''''''farmer''']][[Special:Contributions/Starfarmer|'''∗''']][[User talk:Starfarmer|'''talk''']] 02:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', A full blown global blackout is the best way to raise awareness of an issue that most definitely affects the entire world. IMO, one day without wikipedia is a necessary sacrifice. --[[User:Pianoman148|Pianoman148]]
#'''Support''', Wikipedia's full support would ensure that a large proportion of the internet community will be informed of the SOPA act, and how it would affect the freedom of speech allowed by the internet. --[[User:Asdfftw|Asdfftw]]
#'''Support''' '''[[User:Fluttershy|Flutter]][[User talk:Fluttershy|shy]]''' ''[[Tripcode|!xmcuvg2MH]]'' 18:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - Take action right now! [[User:Jonathansuh|Jonathansuh]] ([[User talk:Jonathansuh|talk]]) 17:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support full blackout''' - No sense going half way, if going to take action, then throttle up and do it right. [[User:Buthsop|Buthsop]]
# '''Support full blackout''' - Italy Wikipedia did it to protest a law, so can we. [[User:Phearson|Phearson]] ([[User talk:Phearson|talk]]) 15:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support full blackout'''. We are a movement dedicated to the ideal of knowledge for all; it is blatantly obvious this bill seeks not only to limit that ideal, it seems to me it is a step towards another country suffering under a great firewall. We live in an age where our fundamental right of dissent is limited; an age where peaceful assembly is too often made violent by the authorities sworn to protect us. As of now they cannot do that here, and thus we must ensure the internet remains the one place we can stay free. [[User:Sovereignlance|Sovereignlance]] ([[User talk:Sovereignlance|talk]]) 06:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#: Fully disable the site. Place a link up with information not only for congressional information that way users from the United States can contact their representatives, but a link to the state department may be useful for international users as well. This is a global issue. [[User:Sovereignlance|Sovereignlance]] ([[User talk:Sovereignlance|talk]]) 04:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' as first choice. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] [[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]] 04:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' as first choice This is the only way to really get readers' attention. Although I don't know how I will survive WIkipedia-free for a whole 24 hours! [[User:Grover cleveland|Grover cleveland]] ([[User talk:Grover cleveland|talk]]) 04:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' as second choice. First choice: Reddit Option. I also would note that the other options have had a longer time to gather votes, and that some editors, having voted for the best choice available at the time they voted, will not come back and discover that a new option for a full blackout has been added. This may bias the vote totals. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 04:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' No half-measure, plz. [[User:Tevildoii|Tevildoii]] ([[User talk:Tevildoii|talk]]) 04:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' We need to ensure that everyone hears us. [[User:Imasleepviking|Imaslee]][[User:Imasleepviking/Justin McKane|pviking]] ( [[User talk:Imasleepviking|talk]] ) 05:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:JohnnyLurg|JohnnyLurg]] ([[User talk:JohnnyLurg|talk]]) 05:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:LordMaldad2000|LordMaldad2000]] ([[User talk:LordMaldad2000|talk]]) 05:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC) I agree, no half measures. This has to be defeated.
#Preferred option. I know this won't be implemented on this occasion, but it certainly should be used next time around if Wednesday's action does not help bring about the necessary changes. —[[User talk:WFCforLife|WFC]]— 05:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Needs to be done, ***. --[[User:Sje46|Sje46]] ([[User talk:Sje46|talk]]) 05:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Sje46}}
#'''Support'''. True blackout including restricted access to content is the only way to get real attention. If it has to be merely a splash that can be clicked through, I hope it will be visible to people who follow search engine links to Wikipedia articles and not just those who visit the Wikipedia main page. [[User:Gzabers|Gzabers]] ([[User talk:Gzabers|talk]]) 06:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Only a full blackout would force the mainstream media to mention it (TV, radio, etc.,). Or force the user to close a full page banner on each and every page view. If the banner is only as annoying as normal ads on sites, then people won't care. [[User:Jdm64|Jdm64]] ([[User talk:Jdm64|talk]]) 06:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#: I agree. Anything less than full blackout will at best be ignored like common advertising, or at worst be rejected like irritating spam. Middle-of-the-road options are too ineffective to be worth the trouble, and may backfire. [[User:Badon|Badon]] ([[User talk:Badon|talk]]) 07:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout''' This is the only way to truly capture peoples attention. Splash-screens and banners will be clicked through and ignored. [[User:Loserpenguin15|Loserpenguin15]] ([[User talk:Loserpenguin15|talk]]) 06:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Tgeairn|Tgeairn]] ([[User talk:Tgeairn|talk]]) 06:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Strong support''' The whole point is to demonstrate the importance of WP being available. Anything less than a full blackout, at a time when passage of the bill is still uncertain, would be useless. Concur with [[User:Dkonstantinos|dkonstantinos]], [[User:Mabuse|Mabuse]], etc. » [[user:swpb|Swpb]]''[[user talk:swpb|τ]] [[WP:DDD|•]] [[special:contributions/swpb|¢]]'' 17:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Suppoer''' This will maximize the impact of this action. --[[User:Wonderstruck|Wonderstruck]] ([[User talk:Wonderstruck|talk]]) 06:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout''' --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 06:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout''' [[User:Dkriegls|Dkriegls]] ([[User talk:Dkriegls|talk]]) 07:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Make an impact to the maximum extent possible --[[User:Camilo Sanchez|Camilo Sanchez]] ([[User talk:Camilo Sanchez|talk]]) 07:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout''' - [[User:Neutralhomer|Neutralhomer]] • [[User talk:Neutralhomer|Talk]] • 07:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout''' [[User:Alyeska|Alyeska]] ([[User talk:Alyeska|talk]]) 07:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout''' [[User:Ironlion45|Ironlion45]] ([[User talk:Ironlion45|talk]]) 07:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#[[User:CharlieEchoTango|CharlieEchoTango]] ([[User talk:CharlieEchoTango#top|contact]]) 07:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' [[User:Robin klein|Robin klein]] ([[User talk:Robin klein|talk]]) 08:02, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout, worldwide''' Lets not underestimate the stakes, ladies and gentlemen. This is the goddamn free internet were talking about here, and this SOPA business is a worldwide issue seeing as similar laws have already been passed in countries around the world at the United States' "encouragement". Make no mistake, this SOPA bill is the thin end of a very thick wedge that we will never be able to shake off if this goes ahead. This is it, cyberspace is the last truly free space left for the people, there is no more land left to run to and start anew a la founding fathers. There has already been too much incursion by the establishment into this domain, DMCA, PRO IP, ICE seizure shenanigans. We need to draw the line and say "this far, and no further". We should make a BIG impact and get news media buzzing worldwide, Wikipedia had become so integral to how people learn and discover that turning it off for a day would dominate worldwide media the whole time, and for a significant time after probably. This could very well be the killing blow to the beleaguered SOPA, and PIPA and whatever form the legislation comes back as in the future, because it will, and when that happens people will still remember the great wikipedia blackout.......and so will legislators.
#'''Support''' [[User:TotientDragooned|TotientDragooned]] ([[User talk:TotientDragooned|talk]]) 08:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout''' as first choice. -- [[User:A.M.|A.M.]] ([[User talk:A.M.|talk]]) 08:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:Seewolf|Seewolf]] ([[User talk:Seewolf|talk]]) 08:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout, worldwide''' Here are my reasons:
#: (1) Worldwide, because US citizens abroad can vote in US elections.
#: (2) Worldwide, because if citizens of other countries are inconvenienced by the (threat of) laws passed by the US government, then those citizens can put pressure on their countries' diplomats to in turn put pressure on the US government.
#: (3) Worldwide, because this will alert people outside the US to the likely effects if their own governments attempt to pass legislation like SOPA.
#: (4) A full blackout because I'm not convinced a mere click-through banner will sufficiently demonstrate to users just how much they would be inconvenienced if SOPA/etc are passed and sites based upon user contributions really do have to go dark.
#: [[User:Zazpot|zazpot]] ([[User talk:Zazpot|talk]]) 08:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# ...[[User:Sicherlich|Sicherlich]] [[:de:Benutzer Diskussion:Sicherlich|Post]] 10:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:-jkb-|-jkb-]] ([[User talk:-jkb-|talk]]) 11:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC) +1 (:DE)
# '''support''' -- [[User:Zeitgeist|southgeist]] ([[User talk:Zeitgeist|talk]]) 11:18, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:YMS|YMS]] ([[User talk:YMS|talk]]) 11:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Strong support''' as preferred choice. - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 11:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Strong Support''' It needs to be drastic so it can be effective. -- [[User:Orionist|'''Orionist''']] ★ [[User talk:Orionist|talk]] 11:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support full blackout'''. The entire point of a blackout is to disrupt people's normal internet use. That's what SOPA would do ''permanently''. We shouldn't have a click-through that allows users to get to Wikipedia with minimal disruption. That's not what a site taken down by the attorney general for alleged copyright infringement will look like! An option might be to host Wikipedia through a proxy IP address that isn't attached to a any nameserver, and post the IP address to various newsgroups that can be found with a bit of googling. That might more accurately resemble the internet of the future if SOPA is passed. [[User:Sławomir Biały|Sławomir Biały]] ([[User talk:Sławomir Biały|talk]]) 12:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''strong support''': as we did for it.wiki.--[[User:Nickanc|Nickanc]] ([[User talk:Nickanc|talk]]) 12:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''strong support''' [[Special:Contributions/109.150.245.44|109.150.245.44]] ([[User talk:109.150.245.44|talk]]) 12:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support full blackout''' What does it help, if people can still read Wikipedia during "blackout"? If SOPA is enacted, we might '''never''' read Wikipedia again! --[[User_talk:Raphael1|Raphael1]] 12:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' This approach has my strongest support, as I think this approach brings the most forceful punch, to make people see very clearly what the stakes are, which is potentially "Bye Bye Wikipedia". The inconvenience of not being able to access articles is the point! [[User:Stevietheman|'''Stevie is the man!''']] [[User talk:Stevietheman|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Stevietheman|Work]] 14:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Full blackout, no access for at least 24 hours. [[User:DNForever|DNForever]] ([[User talk:DNForever|talk]]) 18:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' Lets shut down the internet. The world can survive for 12 hours. [[User:Skeletonboy|Skeletonboy]] ([[User talk:Skeletonboy|talk]]) 14:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' I believe shutting down Wikipedia completely will get the most attention. [[User:Ente75]] ([[User talk:Ente75|talk]]) 14:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' Everyone around the world will be affected by SOPA/PIPA by virtue of the size of the Internet in the United States. Everyone needs to know. [[User:x42bn6|x42bn6]] [[User talk:x42bn6|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/x42bn6|Mess]] 14:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support.''' I assume that this would be for the English Wikipedia worldwide, as allowing only non-US editors to edit would be a rather strange experiment. (Partial blackout is also fine, but this is better. We should be fully solidarious with the other big sites in this matter.) [[User:Hans Adler|Hans]] [[User talk:Hans Adler|Adler]] 15:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly support full global blackout'''. [[Special:Contributions/212.247.249.162|212.247.249.162]] ([[User talk:212.247.249.162|talk]]) 13:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Before reading Geoff's note I thought SOPA wasn't something that could actually concern Wikipedia. But the federal lawsuit as a first step for removing a ''link'' to some pirate site is ridiculous. Heck, someone added one of those in thier /Evidence in a recent ArbCom case, and it was probably by accident. [[User:ASCIIn2Bme|ASCIIn2Bme]] ([[User talk:ASCIIn2Bme|talk]]) 15:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#As first choice. [[Special:Contributions/71.175.53.239|71.175.53.239]] ([[User talk:71.175.53.239|talk]]) 15:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This proposed law would make Wikipedia as it currently stands untenable. [[User:AndyTheGrump|AndyTheGrump]] ([[User talk:AndyTheGrump|talk]]) 15:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Full blackout is necessary to raise awareness across entire spectrum of internet users. [[User:Mabuse|Mabuse]] ([[User talk:Mabuse|talk]]) 16:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Very, very strong support''' - this will make a solid reason for voting against SOPA in the houses, and will show what will happen if SOPA passes. [[User:SiPlus|SiPlus]] ([[User talk:SiPlus|talk]]) 16:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' - Vaccines are always useful. A small dose of what would happen, in order to help prevent the full blown disease from occurring. - [[User:SudoGhost|Sudo]][[User_talk:SudoGhost#top|Ghost]] 16:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Bcartolo|bcartolo]] ([[User talk:Bcartolo|talk]]) 16:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#Full please. [[User:Ajraddatz|Ajraddatz]] ([[User Talk:Ajraddatz|Talk]]) 16:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''.—[[User:Ezhiki|Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky)]] • ([[User talk:Ezhiki|yo?]]); January 14, 2012; 16:37 (UTC)
#'''Support''' ~[[User:Feedintm|Feedintm]][[User talk:Feedintm|Parley]] 16:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:SarahStierch|SarahStierch]] ([[User talk:SarahStierch|talk]]) 16:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Dkonstantinos|dkonstantinos]] ([[User talk:Dkonstantinos|talk]]) 16:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Strong Support Full Global Blackout'''. While SOPA might be originating in the US, its consequences will reach far beyond our borders. Banners are ignored. The real consequences of this action need to felt to be understood. I'd prefer it not be a click through, but actually block the site. Although I agree with points that have been made that we need to be sure that information about SOPA and PIPA is available to users. [[User:Mahewa|&Dagger; MAHEWA &Dagger;]] • [[User talk:Mahewa|talk]] 16:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - There is no impact if it's something that is easily dismissed. Will it make a lot of people angry that one of their favorite websites is gone for a day? Yes, excellent, then they can consider how pissed off they would be if it was shut down for good. [[User:DavidSSabb|DavidSSabb]] ([[User talk:DavidSSabb|talk]]) 16:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# "Support" I believe nothing short of a full global blackout will get this issue the attention it needs. [[User:Brandorr|Brandorr]] ([[User talk:Brandorr|talk]]) 16:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' per [[User:Mr.98]]. [[User:Carlsmith|Carlsmith]] ([[User talk:Carlsmith|talk]]) 16:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''All of the Support'''. I will miss my dear Wiki, but if we can spread a message this way and reach the majority of the web, then so be it. [[User:Lucasoutloud|Lucasoutloud]] ([[User talk:Lucasoutloud|talk]]) 16:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --'''[[User:Jeffwang|J]] [[User_talk:Jeffwang|(t)]]''' 16:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support and Applaud''' - Leave . A . Welt [[User:JakeInJoisey|JakeInJoisey]] ([[User talk:JakeInJoisey|talk]]) 17:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' -- The only way to educate the common public is to shut down Wikipedia. In 2012, most people ignore banners and advertisements, but they can't ignore a site that is shutdown. Hopefully this will be enough to motivate people to contact their congressman. • [[User:Sbmeirow|Sbmeirow]] • [[User talk:Sbmeirow|Talk]] • 17:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Wvk|Wvk]] ([[User talk:Wvk|talk]]) 17:08, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Barronitaly|Barronitaly]] ([[User talk:Barronitaly|talk]]) 17:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Kangaroopower|'''Kangaroo''']][[User Talk:Kangaroopower|'''powah''']] 17:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Strong support''' If we want to get the message across, we need to give people a real taste of what this bill could do; this is the best way to do it. [[User:The Blade of the Northern Lights|The Blade of the Northern Lights]] ([[User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights|話して下さい]]) 17:18, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --The only method to '''completely express''' the destruction this bill will cause. Action needs to be taken. [[User:saffy21|Saffy21]] ([[User talk:Saffy21|talk]]) 17:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support Full Blackout, Worldwide, on Jan 18th from 8am–8pm EST''' --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 17:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support Full blackout,''' worldwide, on Jan 18th from 8 am-10pm EST{{spa|66.26.225.64}}
# '''Support Full Blackout, Worldwide, on Jan 18th from 8am–8pm EST''' [[User:Designer1993|Designer1993]] ([[User talk:Designer1993|talk]]) 17:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:Avicennasis|Avic]][[User talk:Avicennasis|ennasis]] @ 17:31, 19 Tevet 5772 / 17:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# "Strong support" -- SOPA is an existential threat to Wikipedia and the Internet itself. This vicious attack on the Internet from America threatens the global Internet and must be treated in the same manner as other attacks on global resources by rogue nations. Only full blackout responds adequately. I apologize for any formatting errors because I am an amateur editor at best who mainly corrects typos. [[User:Muldrake|Muldrake]] ([[User talk:Muldrake|talk]]) 17:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Blood sliver|Blood sliver]] ([[User talk:Blood sliver|talk]]) 17:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- If the law(s) are passed, there would be much worse than one day of unavailability. [[User:Snackwell|Snackwell]] ([[User talk:Snackwell|talk]]) 17:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' -- This is the best way to raise awareness and give the public a taste of what censorship feels like. [[User:ThreeOfCups|ThreeOfCups]] ([[User talk:ThreeOfCups|talk]]) 17:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support full blackout implemented globally''' as first choice, soft blackout globally second choice. I hope that's specific enough and in the right place. I already voted yesterday, am back due to the bot notification, and find navigating this page anything but intuitive. [[User:Rivertorch|Rivertorch]] ([[User talk:Rivertorch|talk]]) 17:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. If we're not going to pull out all the stops for a threat like SOPA, for what exactly would we? There is no sense in going halfway here. --[[User:Fang Aili|Fang Aili]] [[User talk:Fang Aili|talk]] 18:01, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' This bill is incredibly dangerous to the continued operation of Wikipedia as an open encyclopedia that anyone can contribute to. The systems that would have to be installed to monitor changes before they go live would be extremely cost-ineffective and the alternative could bring down Wikipedia altogether. Thus, this stark action is necessary to bring attention to what things would be like if SOPA (or PIPA) passes, and pooling our collective effort into educating Congress on responsible legislation of the Internet. --[[User:Hyper Anthony|Hyper Anthony]] ([[User talk:Hyper Anthony|talk]]) 18:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' -- The average American will begin to understand just how bad this bill is, and then we will be able to effectively combat these bills by getting more people to call representatives. I mean, just think about how many people who visit Wikipedia each day will be able to feel how it could possibly be in the future if we don't take action. I think we should follow reddit. [[User:Goat999|Goat999]] ([[User talk:Goat999|talk]]) 18:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' If we do a full blackout for 24 hours, that'll show what SOPA could do for years. Also, no vandals! [[User talk:Pilif12p|Pilif]][[Special:Contributions/Pilif12p|12p]] 18:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' — people need to understand how dependent they've become on resources like this, which would be devastatingly affected by SOPA. They need a preview of what a broken Internet looks like. Congresspeople may not use Wikipedia, but I can guarantee that their staffers — the people who actually help them determine their position on issues — do daily (I know a few of them). --[[User:Mr.98|Mr.98]] ([[User talk:Mr.98|talk]]) 18:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Jesant13|Jesant13]] ([[User talk:Jesant13|talk]]) 18:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', soft is fine too but I think this is much more appropriate. Users will actually touch what the effect of SOPA on the internet might be. [[User:GroupT|~GT~]] ([[User talk:GroupT|talk]]) 18:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Jdforrester|James F.]] [[User talk:Jdforrester|(talk)]] 18:44, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' – ''[[User:Danmichaelo|Danmichaelo]] ([[User talk:Danmichaelo|talk]])'' 18:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Clear message: Full blackout for 24h. -- [[User:Andreas Werle|Andreas Werle]] ([[User talk:Andreas Werle|talk]]) 18:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' This will be the most effective option on people around the world, and people will truly see the harm that this bill causes. I think this is a great idea. [[User:Alexroller|Alexroller]] ([[User talk:Alexroller|talk]]) 18:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Wendin|Wendin]] ([[User talk:Wendin|talk]]) 18:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' '''[[User:UpstateNYer|upstate]][[User talk:UpstateNYer|NYer]]''' 18:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I support a full blackout for up to 24 hours. [[User:Constant314|Constant314]] ([[User talk:Constant314|talk]]) 19:01, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Blackout für vier Tage bis zum Sonntag. Das bleibt im Gedächtnis! Gruss --[[User:Nightflyer|Nightflyer]] ([[User talk:Nightflyer|talk]]) 19:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - the "free knowledge" arguments against have some weight with me, but this option makes the strongest statement in a critical situation. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 18:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' [[User:Jfeise|jfeise]] ([[User talk:Jfeise|talk]]) 19:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support full blackout''' - We might as well show the actual results of internet censorship, no compromises with some banner click-through. [[User:Haku8645|Haku8645]] ([[User talk:Haku8645|talk]]) 19:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support full blackout''' - If SOPA is passed, freedom of speech is violated. What is Wikipedia? [[User:Okeekobee|Okeekobee]] ([[User talk:Okeekobee|talk]]) 19:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' [[User:Perlit|Perlit]] ([[User talk:Perlit|talk]]) 19:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - but I could also live with the soft option. [[User:Mr.choppers|''' ⊂| Mr.choppers |⊃ ''']] ([[User Talk:Mr.choppers|talk]]) 19:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' --<big>''' [[User:L337p4wn|L337p4wn]] '''</big>[[User_Talk:L337p4wn|Talk to me!]] 19:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support Full, Global Blackout.''' SOPA appears to represent the movement of old, past mechanisms of suppression into the publicly-accessible Internet, to keep doing onto us the same game played so effectively in the past. This is an issue that strikes at the heart of the First Amendment. [[User:Gzuufy|Gzuufy]] ([[User talk:Gzuufy|talk]]) 19:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout''' --[[User:Wikinaut|Wikinaut]] ([[User talk:Wikinaut|talk]]) 19:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' A full blackout would express our abhorrence of such a bill and express that the Wikipedia community will not allow such a bill through pass through the United States Congress. --[[User:Kylalak|Kylalak]] ([[User talk:Kylalak|talk]]) 19:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - I feel like if this were up temporarily, followed by a message that said like "This is what will happen if...", etc. Or just have that up the whole time. Regardless, this will grab people's attention. [[User:Lordvader99|Lordvader99]] ([[User talk:Lordvader99|talk]]) 19:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - even though it would be drastic, a real wake-up call that shows people that this is not just yet another tempest in a teapot is necessary. The upside of a splash screen is that it only takes one click to get to the actual content as before; the downside is that, well, it only takes one click to get to the actual content as before. People need to take note, and a temporary closure of the English Wikipedia would accomplish that without really causing a lot of disruption in the long run. (In the grand scheme of things, it'd still just be one day.) -- [[User:Schneelocke|Schneelocke]] ([[User talk:Schneelocke|talk]]) 20:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support.''' [[User:AxelBoldt|AxelBoldt]] ([[User talk:AxelBoldt|talk]]) 20:02, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Very Strong Support''' - A full blackout is the least we can do. People say it's an inconvenience, but that's the whole point. People aren't going to pay attention to this unless it's an inconvenience. If it's some click-through page they're just gonna click right through it. It's an Internet routine. Do you not think it's inconvenient for protesters to stand out in the rain holding signs all day and night? This is nothing in comparison. You don't have to do anything, except forego Wikipedia for one single day! And that's too hard for you? That is the worst kind of cowardice. People say we shouldn't keep people from information because then they wouldn't be able to learn about SOPA, but the blackout page would contain information about SOPA. People say we should save the full blackout for later, but that could be too late. Procrastination will get us nowhere. People say Wikipedia shouldn't get involved in politics. Give me a break! That's like the government passing legislation that puts your wife in prison without trial and you not saying anything because "you don't wanna get involved in politics." SOPA affects and hurts Wikipedia directly. Of course it should get involved. [[User:TharosTheDragon|TharosTheDragon]] ([[User talk:TharosTheDragon|talk]]) 20:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Very Strong Support''' - 100% agree with previous speaker --[[User:Niklas 555|Niklas 555]] ([[User talk:Niklas 555|talk]]) 20:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - This will send the strongest message, and will more effectively demonstrate the consequences of SOPA. Drive the point home I say! [[User:Jessemv|Jessemv]] ([[User talk:Jessemv|talk]]) 20:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - A strong message needs to be sent. [[User:Focus|Focus]] ([[User talk:Focus|talk]]) 20:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# I strongly prefer a full blackout to a soft blackout, but a soft blackout is acceptable as an alternative. [[User:Protonk|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk|talk]]) 20:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' A full blackout shows what the world would be if SOPA and Protect IP pass. Even though Wikipedia is against copyright infringement, SOPA and Protect IP could hold Wikipedia liable if some user unknowingly uploads one copyrighted file. Also, turning Wikipedia off for one day will not hurt ad-revenue (there is none), it will not hurt the user base (5th largest in the world), and it will have maximum effect in rallying supporters. [[User:Drivec|Drivec]] ([[User talk:Drivec|talk]]) 20:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#''''Full support''' for a full blackout! Me and my wife will promise to donate if Wikipedia will go on a full blackout. [[User:Jurjenb|Jurjenb]] ([[User talk:Jurjenb|talk]]) 20:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support full blackout''', global preferred. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 20:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - I hate the idea of not being able to access Wikipedia for a bit... Maybe that same sentiment will get people to think about what's going on. --[[User:Talvieno|Talvieno]] ([[User talk:Talvieno|talk]]) 20:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - A strong message is key. [[User:A13ean|a13ean]] ([[User_talk:A13ean|talk]]) 20:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' full blackout, no to sopa{{spa|Catinark }}
# '''Strong Support''' per TharosTheDragon [[User:Aleichem|Aleichem]] ([[User talk:Aleichem|talk]]) 20:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support full blackout''' [[User:Hello32020|Hello32020]] ([[User talk:Hello32020|talk]]) 20:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC) - update, yes '''global''' [[User:Hello32020|Hello32020]] ([[User talk:Hello32020|talk]]) 12:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' with a few reservations. A simple click-through banner would be ineffective as almost all readers would not bother to read it before they closed it. It might even be counter-productive as a good few, not reading it would take it for advertising and think wikipedia had either succumbed to the desire to generate more revenue or had extended those ghastly 'Personal appeal from an author of 50 Billion wikipedia article banners. The blackout should only be applied in the presence of '''overwhelming''' community consensus as, if it as seen to be anything else we'll lose a lot of editors over the controversy. It's inevitable that a few will be disillusioned and leave, claiming that WP has abandoned NPOV but should it be seen to be rammed through by the WMF and Jimbo then the backlash could do serious harm to the 'pedia. [[User:Now We Try It My Way|Now We Try It My Way]] ([[User talk:Now We Try It My Way|talk]]) 20:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' A full blackout is the only way "normal" people will understand the possible effects of SOPA/PIPA. [[User:TEG24601|TEG]] ([[User talk:TEG24601|talk]]) 21:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full blackout. [[User:Cathartica|Cathartica]] ([[User talk:Cathartica|talk]]) 21:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Delfort|Delfort]] ([[User talk:Delfort|talk]]) 21:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout''' Purity is great, but we are not telling people which presidential candidate to support, we are pointing out ''likely consequences'' of law-by-lobbyists—that is our responsibility as all readers need to know what may occur. [[User:Johnuniq|Johnuniq]] ([[User talk:Johnuniq|talk]]) 21:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Most commentators are saying that anything less than full commitment will be ineffective. [[User:Marcus Qwertyus|'''Marcus''']] [[User talk:Marcus Qwertyus|'''Qwertyus''']] 21:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Sargoth|Sargoth]] ([[User talk:Sargoth|talk]]) 21:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:Von Restorff|Von Restorff]] ([[User talk:Von Restorff|talk]]) 22:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' It's the most effective message we can deliver. The date and [http://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/ogyw7/i_am_very_happy_that_obama_has_come_out_against/ wording] may be moved around a bit, but the bill still isn't in our favor.[[User:Smallman12q|Smallman12q]] ([[User talk:Smallman12q|talk]]) 22:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I think that it's important that Wikipedia shut down totally so that it's a newsworthy event rather than just another banner ad. [[User:Froth|.froth.]] ([[User talk:Froth|talk]]) 22:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Make it the last US blackout we need -attack with overwhelming force. --[[User:Indolering|Indolering]] ([[User talk:Indolering|talk]]) 22:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Although it would be inconvenient for a day, it would definitely show a message. And, if SOPA passes, then it could be a possibility that wikipedia gets shut down completely, so people could see what the horrendous almost-reality SOPA is. [[User:Estemshorn|eSTeMSHORN]] ([[User_Talk:Estemshorn|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Estemshorn|C]]) 22:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Small sacrifice for what could come in the future. ''' [[User:Marlith|Marlith]][[User talk:Marlith| (Talk)]] ''' 22:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. It would raise awareness even to the laymen among us. [[User:Django the Duke|Django the Duke]] ([[User talk:Django the Duke|talk]]) 22:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Django the Duke{{spa|Django the Duke}}
#'''Support'''. I support the fullest blackout possible to raise complete awareness. [[User:Fendue|Fendue]] ([[User talk:Fendue|talk]]) 23:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This bill is not so much about Wikipedia as the future of the internet as a whole. The fact Wikipedia is so frequently visited means people worldwide will see what SOPA truly could unleash. I thus support a blackout for the global site, not just the US portions. [[User:Jed 20012|Captain Gamma]] ([[User talk:Jed 20012|talk]]) 23:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. (Preference: US-only) This sends a strong message. How is the world affected if laws and governments censor free speech similar to and including Wikipedia? [[User:Hayesgm|Geoff]] ([[User talk:Hayesgm|talk]]) 23:18, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This bill will basically turn the Internet into the playtoy of censors everywhere who don't like something for any reason. The US government needs to see that SOPA will ruin the Internet in the strongest possible way. [[User:Jesse Viviano|Jesse Viviano]] ([[User talk:Jesse Viviano|talk]]) 23:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I won't like the blackout, no one will like the blackout; however, i believe this is a necessary action to raise awareness over such an important issue.--[[User:Stujames|Stujames]] ([[User talk:Stujames|talk]]) 23:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)stuartjames
#'''Strong Support'''. Please support a full blackout. Protest is inconvenient. Action is much more powerful than a kind word of support. A click through is little more than an advertisement, which I thought Wikipedia was against.[[User:StevenPine|StevenPine]] ([[User talk:StevenPine|talk]]) 23:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full blackout. [[User:Shubinator|Shubinator]] ([[User talk:Shubinator|talk]]) 23:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Better one day without WP than jeopardizing the future of the internet as we know it. --[[User:Dschwen|Dschwen]] 23:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. I believe that this will throw it into the faces of the masses and make sure they know what is going on with their internet. I think it should be active during 8am - 8pm like Reddit and possibly continue a soft blackout longer than that with a click-through page. A full blackout will be sure to get true attention to such an important cause. Hopefully I don't have research to do that day :L[[User:korney654|Josh]] ([[User talk:korney654|talk]]) 23:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Given this issue directly affects Wikipedia's ability to educate the world a world blackout seems appropriate. [[User:PeRshGo|PeRshGo]] ([[User talk:PeRshGo|talk]]) 23:44, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:Kavi96|Kavi96]] ([[User talk:Kavi96|talk]]) 23:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I strongly support full blackout - we need to send a strong message. [[User:Drops in sente|Drops in sente]] ([[User talk:Drops in sente|talk]]) 23:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Drops in sente}}
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:ODonnellCiaran|ODonnellCiaran]] ([[User talk:ODonnellCiaran|ODonnellCiaran]]) 23:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|ODonnellCiaran}}
#'''Stongly Support'''. I support full blackout. Allowing a click-through can hardly even be called an inconvenience, as junk splash screens are nothing new, and the message will be ignored and go largely un-heeded. [[Special:Contributions/75.244.112.66|75.244.112.66]] ([[User talk:75.244.112.66|talk]]) 00:08, 15 January 2012(UTC){{spa|75.244.112.66}}
#'''Support'''. Don't suppose it would be possible to allow people to log-in to access Wikipedia normally, which would give the side-benefit for the community to have the first ever day to clean out backlogs. [[User:Wittylama|Witty]][[User talk:wittylama|lama]] 00:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Full and Total Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:Mike44456|Mike44456]] ([[User talk:Mike44456|talk]]) 00:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This is too critical of an issue to half-ass. I support full blackout. [[User:Riphamilton|Riphamilton]] ([[User talk:Riphamilton|talk]]) 00:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. People may be temporarily frustrated by the action, but if SOPA passes, the implications could be much worse. The only way SOPA passes is if people are unaware of the potential implications beyond it's seemingly innocuous name. A full blackout goes a long way towards raising awareness. Since Wikipedia has a massive userbase that extends far beyond the userbase typical of Reddit and other sites, it is absolutely critical that this blackout occurs in order to raise awareness to a much larger audience. [[User:Ravensfan5252|Jason Smith]] ([[User talk:Ravensfan5252|talk]]) 00:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:x42bn6|x42bn6]] [[User talk:x42bn6|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/x42bn6|Mess]] 00:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:Chitown03|Chitown03]] ([[User talk:Chitown03|talk]]) 00:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:Steamfire|Steamfire]] ([[User talk:Steamfire|talk]]) 00:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''.You dont realize what you have until its gone. This is the way to go
#'''Support'''. This action is analogous to a labor strike or a rent strike, and the strategy is the same. [[User:Circumspice|Circumspice]] 00:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:§Ariel|§Ariel]] ([[User talk:§Ariel|talk]]) 00:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. However, there should be substantial information about SOPA available for visitors (not just one paragraph). [[User:Ypnypn|ypnypn]] ([[User talk:Ypnypn|talk]]) 00:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:Orashmatash|Orashmatash]] ([[User talk:Orashmatash|talk]]) 01:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support a full blackout. [[User:Dkreisst|Dkreisst]] ([[User talk:Dkreisst|talk]]) 01:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. full blackout seems best. It needs to draw attention. [[User:Hobit|Hobit]] ([[User talk:Hobit|talk]]) 01:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout.  — [[User:Hydrargyrum|Quicksilver]][[User_talk:Hydrargyrum|T]] [[Special:Emailuser/Hydrargyrum|@]] 01:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' If we are going to stand against SOPA, we need to stand strong. While having a click through option with banners can be effective, nothing would be more impacting than completely shutting off the site, showing our readers and editors what internet censorship is truly like and what could happen if SOPA is to pass. The downside of not having Wikipedia available for day is minuscule to the downside of SOPA passing. ~[[User:SuperHamster|Super]][[User:SuperHamster|Hamster]] [[User talk:SuperHamster|Talk]] [[Special:Contributions/SuperHamster|Contribs]] 01:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. Actually, I '''Strong Support''' full blackout. People need to know that this can kill the internet, and they must be shown WHY, and they must be shown it strong enough to actually call their senator. [[User:Fieari|Fieari]] ([[User talk:Fieari|talk]]) 01:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC) -- I would like to clarify that I support a global blackout of 1 day, and if this is not acceptable to wikipedia, then a US blackout of 1 day, and if this is not acceptable, then a clickthrough of as many days as it takes (MORE than 1 day). [[User:Fieari|Fieari]] ([[User talk:Fieari|talk]]) 19:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Very Strong Support'''. The Internet is dead without Wiki. People need to understand this. [[User:Musicguyguy|music]][[User_talk:Musicguyguy|GUY]][[Special:Contributions/Musicguyguy|GUY]] 01:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' as first option. In fact, I believe this is the only option worth committing to. A banner won't do the job; we need to make it clear the kind of danger SOPA poses to all websites. We can do without Wikipedia for a single day, but if SOPA passes, we just might have to do without it forever. [[User:Lunaibis|Luna]][[User talk:Lunaibis|ibis]] 01:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:Salicaceae|Salicaceae]] ([[User talk:Salicaceae|talk]]) 01:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - this will have the greatest impact and deliver the strongest message, unequivocally. [[User:Tony Fox|Tony Fox]] [[User_talk:Tony Fox|(arf!)]] 01:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:WHPratt|WHPratt]] ([[User talk:WHPratt|talk]]) 01:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:3M3RY|3M3RY]] ([[User talk:3M3RY|talk]]) 01:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout, but there should be a virtual link or frontpage explaining the reasoning behind the full blackout . [[User:Djp3rso|el diablo es la ignorancia]] ([[User talk:Djp3rso|talk]]) 01:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. I doubt that a simple click through page will even be glanced at by most users, and will be ultimately ignored. [[User:Thatguy0900|Thatguy0900]] ([[User talk:Thatguy0900|talk]]) 02:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:Tea Serpent|Tea Serpent]] ([[User talk:Tea Serpent|talk]]) 02:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC) I think only a full black out can draw enough media attention and illustrate the effects of the bill. Anything else will be ineffective.
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. What is one day without wikipedia, compared to a lifetime without wikipedia? My recommendation for the static splash would be a simple box that lets users enter their email address. On the 19th, we can email the users a link to the SOPA page. [[User:Andy17null|Andy17null]] ([[User talk:Andy17null|talk]]) 02:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' If SOPA passes wikipedia will be shut down anyway. --[[User:Gary123|Gary123]] ([[User talk:Gary123|talk]]) 02:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout, with the caveat that explanation of why it's happening is important. [[User:Gus andrews|Gus andrews]] ([[User talk:Gus andrews|talk]]) 02:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:Allicat323|Allicat323]] ([[User talk:Allicat323|talk]]) 02:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', anything less than full blackout is meaningless. [[User:Axem Titanium|Axem Titanium]] ([[User talk:Axem Titanium|talk]]) 02:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', Axem Titanium said it best. ~[[User:Crazytales|Crazytales]] [[User talk:Crazytales|(talk)]] 02:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. This is NOT a political issue. We're defending the fundamental freedom that makes Wikipedia possible. All or nothing. [[User:BDS2006|BDS2006]] ([[User talk:BDS2006|talk]]) 03:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:Noeckel|noeckel]] ([[User talk:Noeckel|talk]]) 03:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:Tgeairn|Tgeairn]] ([[User talk:Tgeairn|talk]]) 03:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. Nut up or Shut up! [[User:Habodek|Habodek]] ([[User talk:Habodek|talk]]) 03:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)‎
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. -- I support a full blackout of Wikipedia with no room for compromise about the subject. Going at it half-way gets nothing across. As the saying goes, "Go big or go home". Either you come at something with full support or you don't in my opinion. I am of the opinion that if a full blackout is not implemented and someone can get around it with a simple SOCKS proxy, that takes all of 10 seconds to configure, or a web-based proxy, then the entire action is pointless. No... Wikipedia need to deliver the point that this form of legislation is dangerous to anyone and everyone regardless of whether they live in the USA or not (considering that the internet effectively, for all intents and purposes, knows no borders or boundaries). It's time to draw the line in the sand. [[User:Evilgohan2|ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ]][[User talk:Evilgohan2|②]] 03:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:Lonewolf9196|Lonewolf9196]] ([[User talk:Lonewolf9196|talk]]) 03:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Jkvannort|jkv]] ([[User talk:Jkvannort|talk]]) 04:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support the full blackout. I may not like the idea of the full blackout because it might affect editors and such, but it might be the only to get awareness to the people who use the internet everyday. [[User:BattleshipMan|BattleshipMan]] ([[User talk:BattleshipMan|talk]]) 04:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- People who do not take Wikipedia for granted will understand that it is only temporary. Those who do take it for granted will hopefully become more educated about WMF's position and ideals. [[User:Ahp378|Ahp378]] ([[User talk:Ahp378|talk]]) 04:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. Copyright expansionists can go to hell. This is the only way to show we are serious. [[User:ChrisRuvolo|ChrisRuvolo]] ([[User talk:ChrisRuvolo|t]]) 04:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:Chiekken|Chiekken]] ([[User talk:Chiekken|talk]]) 04:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[Special:Contributions/68.146.175.39|68.146.175.39]] ([[User talk:68.146.175.39|talk]]) 04:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:Mikewarren|Mikewarren]] ([[User talk:Mikewarren|talk]]) 04:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. '''[[User:Vodello|Agent Vodello]]'''[[User Talk:Vodello|OK, Let's Party, Darling!]] 05:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support a full global blackout. --[[User:ADH10|Addi]][[User:ADH10/T|hockey]][[Special:Contributions/Addihockey10|10]] [[Special:Emailuser/ADH10|e-mail]] 05:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout'''. We can all live without Wikipedia for a day. We can't pretend to be immune from the forces of the world, sometimes we have to lobby for a free Internet. Many other sites will be down by executive decision. It means something different, and will likely spark a lot of public discussion, that we the users are also taking a stand. - [[User:Wikidemon|Wikidemon]] ([[User talk:Wikidemon|talk]]) 05:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support as first choice''' My second choice would be a US-targeted blackout with banners for the rest of the world; if noxious legislation like this passes in the US, it then becomes more likely it will be foisted on other countries. As for the argument that people depend on Wikipedia & would be offended by this action, there are these institutions which provide buildings full of printed materials & free access to online databases known as '''[[library|public libraries]]'''. If a user is bent out of shape because she/he is forced to go to one of these because Wikipedia is unavailable.... Well, I can't think of a way to express my utter & complete contempt for those people succinctly without resorting to saying something nasty. -- [[User:Llywrch|llywrch]] ([[User talk:Llywrch|talk]]) 05:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Full blackout. --[[User:Hu12|Hu12]] ([[User talk:Hu12|talk]]) 05:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I support a full blackout for the message it sends. A click through banner basically says "Hey, we have a message you may or may not read in terms of the internet as we know it being under attack". A full blackout sends the message that this is not a public service announcement, this IS a protest in response to a dangerous piece of legislation, and this is how one of the most important sites on the internet feels about it. The world will not collapse if wikipedia is offline for a tad bit. However, hundreds of thousands can be informed not only by not being able to just click through a banner ad but through the inevitable media it will generate. Congress needs to be shown we are not screwing around and no amount of lobbyist money can compete with people being made fully aware of the fact their internet is in danger'''edit'''I support a full global blackout as this is a global issue[[User:TheMadcapSyd|TheMadcapSyd]] ([[User talk:TheMadcapSyd|talk]]) 05:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Mbroderick271|Mbroderick271]] ([[User talk:Mbroderick271|talk]]) 05:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', second choice. --[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 06:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. [[User:Indy muaddib|indy_muaddib]] ([[User talk:Indy muaddib|talk]]) 06:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I think a full blackout is necessary. [[User:luciferian22|luficerian22]] ([[User talk:luciferrian22|talk]]) 06:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I think that only a blackout will truly demonstrate to the politicians, the public, and anybody who uses wikipedia on a regular basis, the real threat that loss of content poses. Furthermore, I think that the temporary loss of information is well worth the cause. To begin with, the effect of a total wikipedia blackout lasting only one day is minor, and even if it were not, I would think we should be willing to go much farther than this if need be. The treat posed is too dangerous to let petty, transient concerns distract us even for a moment. Do the ends justify the means? Yes. In this case, they absolutely do. [[User:Jalaska13|Jalaska13]] ([[User talk:Jalaska13|talk]]) 06:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support full blackout. To get someone's attention (incl. media and Congressional staffers) you have to inconvenience them [[User:Solicitr|Solicitr]] ([[User talk:Solicitr|talk]]) 06:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''- [[User:Reyk|'''Reyk''']] [[User talk:Reyk|'''YO!''']] 06:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - This will have the greatest effect, as it will fully demonstrate what it would be like without Wikipedia. I think that we should aim for as great of an effect as possible. ~~ [[User:Hi878|Hi878]] [[User talk:Hi878|(''Come shout at me!'')]] 06:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' - The best way to show people what it will be like without sites like Wikipedia is to take away sites like Wikipedia. We've all been to sites where content is delayed by a 15 second ad; how many of you remember what those ads are about? A click-through will not be effective enough. [[User:Benscripps|Benscripps]] ([[User talk:Benscripps|talk]]) 06:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:OttoMäkelä|OttoMäkelä]] ([[User talk:OttoMäkelä|talk]]) 07:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:Asdf01|Asdf01]] ([[User talk:Asdf01|talk]]) 07:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. We need a strong gesture. [[User:InverseHypercube|InverseHypercube]] 07:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Machchunk|Machchunk]] | [[User talk:Machchunk|make some noise at me]] 07:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', provided that there are ways for non-US citizens to help support the US citizens too, because some feel strong about the issue. --[[User:Marianian|'''Marianian''']]([[User_talk:Marianian|talk]]) 07:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. ''Content'' policies aside, what's the point of them if Wikipedia ceases to exist due to this bill? '''[[User:Falcon8765|Falcon8765]]''' [[User talk:Falcon8765|(TALK)]] 07:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#I'll take this as an alternative to a soft blackout if the community agrees. Besides, it's likely to have more of an effect if people are actually denied the ability to access Wikipedia (among other sites). It would give them a taste of the reality they might live if SOPA were to pass. [[User:Master&Expert|'''Master&'''Expert]] ([[User talk:Master&Expert|Talk]]) 07:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' If we,re going to do something, we might as well do something big. [[User:Circeus|Circéus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2012 (Unbsp;TC)
#'''Support''' - [[User:Clockbox|Clockbox]] ([[User talk:Clockbox|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy|'''minhhuy''']] ([[User talk:Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy|talk]]) ([[wmf:User:Trần Nguyễn Minh Huy|'''WMF''']]) 07:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:MinervaK|MinervaK]] ([[User talk:MinervaK|talk]]) 07:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full blackout. [[User:Soewinhan|<big>'''S'''</big>'''WH''']] [[User talk:Soewinhan|talk]] 07:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. These days, action must be drastic in order to be effective. [[User:SidShakal|SidShakal]] ([[User talk:SidShakal|talk]]) 07:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout'''. We have to declare '''war''' and we have to use the strongest weapon available. [[User:Urbanus Secundus|Urbanus Secundus]] ([[User talk:Urbanus Secundus|talk]]) 07:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Ayup. [[User:Danger|Danger]] [[User talk:Danger|High voltage!]] 07:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - We are all a team here at Wikipedia. We are strong, and we can make it through this. We will survive without using the project for a while, but I'd rather do that, than it be forever under SOPA. I live in Australia, but I don't want to see fellow Wikipedians suffer under this terrible act. Full Blackout, to send accross the full message. -- [[User_talk:MelbourneStar|MST]]☆[[User:MelbourneStar|R]] [[User_talk:MelbourneStar|(Chat Me!)]] 07:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. We can't go out with a whimper.--[[User:Brianann MacAmhlaidh|Brianann MacAmhlaidh]] ([[User talk:Brianann MacAmhlaidh|talk]]) 07:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support full blackout''' [[User:JJ Harrison|JJ Harrison]] ([[User talk:JJ Harrison|talk]]) 08:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' ^what these 232 people said. [[User:Mchcopl|Mchcopl]] ([[User talk:Mchcopl|talk]]) 08:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)!
#'''Support''. Anyone can click through a page and think nothing of it. The only way to reach people is through a full blackout. Yes, it will prevent access to the world's collection of information... but that's the point: SOPA and PIPA threaten this access to information permanently, and people need to see for themselves just how drastically this will affect everything. [[User:Altava|''Emmy'']] [[User_talk:Altava|'''''Altava''''']] 08:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full blackout maybe later on or as second choice to soft blackout. Edit/Update: I support a blackout for several hours, perhaps for a handful of hours when traffic tends to be highest. US blackout with message asking to contact gov reps; world intro-message asking to sign petition in support of American citizens. [[User:Hozelda|Hozelda]] ([[User talk:Hozelda|talk]]) 08:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' This will bring a lot more attention to the issue since most people won't just click through it like the donation banners. Even if it is a bit extreme, doing something this drastic will definitely make people pay attention to the issue. I just wish we could get Google involved as well. No Google for a day would make every internet user in the western hemisphere shit a brick. [[User:Farlo|Farlo]] ([[User talk:Farlo|talk]]) 08:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This will bring a lot more attention to the issue since most people won't just click through it like the donation banners. [[User:Alexgs|Alexgs]] ([[User talk:Alexgs|talk]]) 08:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Someone has probably already suggested this but: I think a temporary full blackout, followed by the click-through blackout screen would be best ([[User:Lexandalf|Lexandalf]] ([[User talk:Lexandalf|talk]]) 08:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC))
#'''Strongly Support''': SOPA is not just an inconvenience; it represents a set of values and goals that are incompatible with the values and goals of the Wikimedia Foundation and the Wikipedia Community. Therefore, I strongly support the blackout. [[User:Kiwi128|Kiwi128]] ([[User talk:Kiwi128|talk]]) 08:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' — '''[[User:SpikeToronto|Spike]][[User talk:SpikeToronto|Toronto]]''' 08:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Don't stop there. Believe and use the threat of moving Wiki offshore where the legislators can't touch it. It's the world's Wiki, not just American [[User:L-Bit|L-Bit]] ([[User talk:L-Bit|talk]]) 08:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full blackout globally. --[[User:Juusohe|Juusohe]] ([[User talk:Juusohe|talk]]) 08:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Juusohe}}
#'''Support''' (US-only blackout) Nobody reads a click-through. People need to be directly affected by what will happen when that nonsense passes. Otherwise they'll take no action. We need people to take action. Q.E.D. [[User:Smurfix|smurfix]] ([[User talk:Smurfix|talk]]) 08:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Ditto for basically every comment above me. '''[[User:IgnorantArmies|I]][[Special:Contributions/IgnorantArmies|♦]][[User talk:IgnorantArmies|A]]''' 08:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:La Corona|La Corona]] ([[User talk:La Corona|talk]]) 08:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' (I support both options ;) ) [[User:Kameraad Pjotr|Kameraad Pjotr]] ([[User talk:Kameraad Pjotr|talk]]) 08:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' This demonstration to the politicians can prove to them about the current trend and not the old times. However I'm not disregarding our historical events. I'm saying that life can change from time to time and right now everyone wants to know about things they do not know.--[[User:Bumblezellio|Bumblezellio]] ([[User talk:Bumblezellio|talk]]) 09:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' The web's most popular source of information should be doing all it can to fight attempts to restrict it. [[User:Robertson-Glasgow|Crusoe]] ([[User talk:Robertson-Glasgow|talk]]) 09:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''''''[[User:Kusma|Kusma]]''' ([[User talk:Kusma|t]]·[[Special:Contributions/Kusma|c]]) 09:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' There is no "slippery slope" to be worried about here, it's a narrowly targeted bill that presents a direct threat to the operation of this site. It would be inconceivable to me for a thoughtful Wikipedian to support this poorly written(and ultimately ineffectual at stopping real crime due to its gaping loopholes) bill.-- [[User:Cabazap|Alyas Grey]] : [[User talk:Cabazap|talk]] 09:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' per most of the people above me. [[User:TheCatalyst31|TheCatalyst31]] [[User talk:TheCatalyst31|Reaction]]•[[Special:Contributions/TheCatalyst31|Creation]] 09:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support a global blackout; this is a global problem [[User:Luna Ariya|Luna Ariya]] ([[User talk:Luna Ariya|talk]]) 09:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', and I mean blacking out globally. Don't know why it should be only in US. It's also a problem elsewhere in the world. --[[User:MrEskola|MrEskola]] ([[User talk:MrEskola|talk]]) 09:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. totally disabled except for a SOPA banner[[User:AndrewKemendo|Andrew]] ([[User talk:AndrewKemendo|talk]]) 09:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' a full global blackout is the only effective way to raise awareness and have our voice heard. Wikipedia belongs to everyone, not just US. --[[User:Sk4170|Sk4170]] ([[User talk:Sk4170|talk]]) 09:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. A full blackout is the only way to properly catch the attention of passive users. Bring it on.
#'''Support''' I'm supporting a global blackout. [[User:KaragouniS|KaragouniS]] : [[User_talk:KaragouniS| Chat ]] 09:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I am confident that enough politicians and voters do read Wikipedia to make this course of action effective. [[User:Michael J. Mullany|Michael J. Mullany]] ([[User talk:Michael J. Mullany|talk]]) 10:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Worldwide, unable to access anything. '''[[User:Nikthestoned|Nik]][[Special:Contributions/Nikthestoned|''the'']][[User talk:Nikthestoned|stoned]]''' 10:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' If it is going to happen, do it properly. [[User:Aircorn|AIR'''''corn''''']] [[User talk:Aircorn|(talk)]] 10:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I support a full global blackout. [[User:Hom sepanta|Hom sepanta]] ([[User talk:Hom sepanta|talk]]) 10:23, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Xjmos|Xjmos]] ([[User talk:Xjmos|talk]]) 10:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:Cary|Cary]] ([[User talk:Cary|talk]]) 10:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Edoderoo|Edoderoo]] ([[User talk:Edoderoo|talk]]) 10:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC) I say no to piracy/copyvio, and no to the way they want to fight it right now.
#'''Support''' I'm a UK user and support a global blackout [[User:Tompagenet|tompagenet]] ([[User talk:Tompagenet|talk]]) 10:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Full Blackout Globally. [[User:RaunakR|RaunakR]] ([[User talk:RaunakR|talk]]) 10:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. please. thinsmek 10:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Yes you can. Do it please. --[[User:Octahedron80|Octra Bond]] ([[User talk:Octahedron80|talk]]) 10:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Follow Reddit! Tinithraviel 11:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#—[[User:S Marshall|'''S Marshall''']] [[User talk:S Marshall|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/S Marshall|C]] 11:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. In the blink of an eye. --[[User:Bender235|bender235]] ([[User talk:Bender235|talk]]) 11:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' As an act of free speech in the interests of the Wikipedia community and in protest of censorship worldwide. --[[User:Xaliqen|Xaliqen]] ([[User talk:Xaliqen|talk]]) 11:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Wpoely86|wpoely86]] ([[User talk:Wpoely86|talk]]) 11:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Full blackout globally. --[[User:Amendola90|Amendola90]] ([[User talk:Amendola90|talk]]) 11:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Full global blackout. Unfortunately, this is an issue that will affect the whole world. '''&tilde;[[User:Danjel|danjel]]''' [ [[User_talk:Danjel|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Danjel|contribs]] ] 11:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Full global blackout. --[[User:Chrisjj|Chris Jefferies]] ([[User talk:Chrisjj|talk]]) 11:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' The Wikimedia Foundation needs to protest against [[wikt:sopa#Noun 4|SOPA]] (Wiktionary explanation: ''a piece of trash'') and this looks like the most efficient option. I don't think it matters too much if countries apart from the United States are affected, so I don't think that it is important to block globally -- only blocking in the United States would be sufficient. Any other option which means taking some kind of option is better than not taking any action at all, of course. --[[User:Stefan2|Stefan2]] ([[User talk:Stefan2|talk]]) 11:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Full Global Blackout - An example of what lack of information will be like. ★[[User:Keys767|KEYS]]★ [[User_talk:Keys767|(talk)]] 12:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Full Global Blackout. --[[User:Davidpar|Davidpar]] ([[User talk:Davidpar|talk]]) 12:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. It would seriously inconvenience a lot of people (myself included), but that's the point. And, as [[User:Phearson|Phearson]] said, Italy did it... — [[:en:User:OwenBlacker|OwenBlacker]] ([[:en:User talk:OwenBlacker|Talk]]) 12:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support Full Blackout''', Worldwide, on Jan 18th from 8am–8pm EST ([[computerkidt]]) 12:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Oneiros|Oneiros]] ([[User talk:Oneiros|talk]]) 12:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout''' [[User:Mecanismo|Mecanismo]] | [[User talk:Mecanismo|Talk]] 12:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Very Strongly Support''' I am from the UK and think a global blackout should happen, SOPA will affect everyone, we must do what we can to stop it, 1 Day of not having wikipedia vs potentially never having wikipedia, youtube and hundreds of other sites, PLEASE wikipedia, GLOBAL BLACKOUT[[User:Guyb123321|Guyb123321]] ([[User talk:Guyb123321|talk]]) 12:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Kleuske|Kleuske]] ([[User talk:Kleuske|talk]]) 12:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Ratboy366|Ratboy366]] ([[User talk:Ratboy366|talk]]) 12:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC) [[User:Ratboy366|Ratboy366]]
#'''Support full blackout''', even non english wikis, as all users worldwide could be affected. --[[User:FoeNyx|FoeNyx]] ([[User talk:FoeNyx|talk]]) 12:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Ariadacapo|Ariadacapo]] ([[User talk:Ariadacapo|talk]]) 12:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. — [[User:TodorBozhinov|Toдor]] [[User talk:TodorBozhinov|Boжinov]] — 13:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support planetwide blackout''' - SOPA is a global threat that needs global awareness and action. All wikis, all languages. [[User:Tom walker|Tom walker]] ([[User talk:Tom walker|talk]]) 13:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Gothmogxx]] SOPA must be fought to the bitter end...
#'''Support''' as first choice. [[User:Prolog|Prolog]] ([[User talk:Prolog|talk]]) 13:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout''' I have no problem with Wikipedia, which aims to unite the world in knowledge, uniting the world in protest too [[User:Doktorbuk|doktorb]] [[User talk:Doktorbuk|words]][[Special:Contributions/Doktorbuk|deeds]] 13:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''[[User talk:Night w|Nightw]]''' 18:17, 13 January 2012 (UTC) (re-added on 13:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC))
#'''Support''' [[User:Roget000|Roget000]] ([[User talk:Roget000|talk]]) 13:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' global. [[User:Silver hr|Silver hr]] ([[User talk:Silver hr|talk]]) 13:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Full global blackout [[User:Andrewmc123|<big>Andrewmc</big>]][[User talk:Andrewmc123|123]] 13:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Fully support full global blackout''' for twenty-four hours (presumably the most objective is 0:00–24:00 GMT?) Anything less will '''not''' generate the required publicity. If we're going to do something, better do it properly. ✝'''[[User:Danbarnesdavies|D]][[User talk:Danbarnesdavies|B]][[Special:Contributions/Danbarnesdavies|D]]''' 13:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' global blackout of en wikipedia, weak support for options 2 and 1 (global or US-only splash screens), in that order. I'd also support a blackout of other wikimedia wikis, after suitable discussion on meta or on those individual wikis (but not just here). --[[User:Avenue|Avenue]] ([[User talk:Avenue|talk]]) 13:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''Most Of SOPA relates to foreign sites.-- [[User:Willdude 132|Willdude 132]]
#'''Support''' [[User:Olsi|Olsi]] ([[User talk:Olsi|talk]]) 14:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Amazeroth|Amazeroth]] ([[User talk:Amazeroth|talk]]) 14:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' a full global blackout. ''That'' will get people talking. —[[User:Saric|Saric]] ([[User talk:Saric|Talk]]) 14:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Globally take down Wikipedia and make it unavailable for the duration of the blackout. Have up, instead, a screen explaining why it is down. If SOPA were successful, it would have a world-wide effect, so it should be global. A simple banner or splash screen would probably not draw enough attention from average users. Maybe leave available [[SOPA]], [[PROTECT IP Act|PIPA]] other similar pages. --[[User:Sauronjim|Sauronjim]] ([[User talk:Sauronjim|talk]]) 14:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. '''[[User:LouriePieterse|Lourie]][[User talk:LouriePieterse|Pieterse]]''' 14:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. People should realise what does SOPA really mean. [[User:Amunak|Amunak]] ([[User talk:Amunak|talk]]) 14:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Lukys|Lukys]] ([[User talk:Lukys|talk]]) 14:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Full global blackout. [[User:Haruth|Haruth]] ([[User talk:Haruth|talk]]) 14:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout.''' As I said above in the other poll, censorship is a growing global issue. How many of us read all of the fundraising banners, let alone donated? How many more would have read them if we couldn't access Wikipedia for a day? Drive the point home. --[[User:Quintucket|Quintucket]] ([[User talk:Quintucket|talk]]) 14:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' global blackout all over the world. --'''[[User:Airon90|→ A]][[Special:Contributions/Airon90|ir]][[User talk:Airon90|on]]''' 14:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 14:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''--[[User:Milad A380|Milad A380]] ([[User talk:Milad A380|talk]]) 14:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - and global is fine by me too (speaking as a UK reader). Even if non-US readers might not care about US issues, the point can be made that the English Wikipedia is (I believe) hosted in Florida, so all users will be affected if the website is affected by the law. [[User:Mdwh|Mdwh]] ([[User talk:Mdwh|talk]]) 14:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - fully support global blackout and welcome additional measures. Regards, [[User:SunCreator|SunCreator]] ([[User talk:SunCreator|talk]]) 14:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support full global blackout.''' The issue is a global threat since a large fraction of websites is at least partially dependent on US services, and therefore SOPA could possible give US rights holders the power of an at least partial worldwide censorship. Therefore, a global act is needed to raise global awareness to this issue.--[[User:SiriusB|SiriusB]] ([[User talk:SiriusB|talk]]) 14:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. '''[[User:Jcaraballo|Jca]][[User Talk:Jcaraballo|raballo]]''' 14:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', though this might be construed as interference in a sovereign nation's right by non-citizens , the nature of globalization necessitates this action to precipitate.and NO , this is not precedent setting.This does impinge on wiki foundational principle ,May knowledge be free and unhindered in flow.nuff said.GD2all [[User:Chimesmonster|RAA Ra Ra your Boat]] ([[User talk:Chimesmonster|talk]]) 13:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support. Global Full Blackout'''. One day's inconvenience is nothing compared to the effects laws like this can have on individuals lives if they're caught up trying to defend themselves against The State. Innocent until proven Guilty, etc. 24 Hr Blackout timing based on Washington time. [[User:The Yeti|The Yeti]] ([[User talk:The Yeti|talk]]) 13:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' We need to make the biggest noise possible. - [[User:Al Lemos|Al Lemos]] ([[User talk:Al Lemos|talk]]) 13:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support. Global Full Blackout''' Full blackout will be much more effective than just a banner. This should be done Globally because US laws also have a huge impact to world wide web in general due to the nature of the ip/dns infrastructure. [[User:Phobetoras|Phobetoras]] ([[User talk:Phobetoras|talk]]) 14:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Liberaler Humanist|Liberaler Humanist]] ([[User talk:Liberaler Humanist|talk]]) 15:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', but US only. -- [[User:Kh80|kh80]] ([[User talk:Kh80|talk]]) 15:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' block out the whole thing send a full message about what the affects might be. (BTW it isn't censorship, it is a statement. Anyways, Laws protecting from censorship only protect us against govenmental censorship.)---'''[[User:Balloonman|Balloonman]]''' ''[[User talk:Balloonman|Poppa Balloon]]'' 15:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', Global. The problem is not a US only one - Spain has proposed a similar legislation, there has been some banter in India as well. [[User:AroundTheGlobe|Around The Globe]][[User_talk:AroundTheGlobe|सत्यमेव जयते]] 15:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Fritzelblitz|Fritzelblitz]] ([[User talk:Fritzelblitz|talk]]) 15:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. It is needed that an worldwide outcry is heard and noticed by the congress, so criticism everywhere has to be raised. [[User:Matthiasb|Matthiasb]] ([[User talk:Matthiasb|talk]]) 15:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''[[User:Eshade|Eshade]] ([[User talk:Eshade|talk]]) 15:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Squiddy|Squiddy]] | [[User talk:Squiddy|(squirt ink?)]] 15:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' [[User:Quibus|Quibus]] ([[User talk:Quibus|talk]]) 16:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' globally [[User:Curtiswwe|Curtiswwe]] ([[User talk:Curtiswwe|talk]]) 16:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. A global, full blackout. This will truly show what it would be like without Wikipedia. - [[User:Benzband|benzband]] ([[User talk:Benzband|talk]]) 16:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' globally, it's a flawed american law but it might have global influence [[User:BeŻet|BeŻet]] ([[User talk:BeŻet|talk]]) 16:10, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This is a major threat to Wikipedia worldwide, it needs to get the attention. Maybe some people who don't care about SOPA will learn to respect the matter. [[User:Pitke|Pitke]] ([[User talk:Pitke|talk]]) 16:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Anything other than a total blackout sends a message that is too weak and less of a newsworthy event (although I am sure a "brownout" would also get coverage). I think this should be US only because if a blackout was requested by Wikipedians in a smaller English-speaking country, they would not get consensus to make it global. Non-US users should be encouraged not to edit, though. --[[User:FormerIP|FormerIP]] ([[User talk:FormerIP|talk]]) 16:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. That is what it means to Blackout. Otherwise it would be known as a "click through" or "pop up", not blackout. Ne0Freedom 16:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Global and full blackout. This is serious! -- [[User:Nazar|Nazar]] ([[User talk:Nazar|talk]]) 16:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This is such an important issue that we need to take drastic steps [[User:Rrrr5|Rrrr5]] ([[User talk:Rrrr5|talk]]) 16:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Atu|Atu]] ([[User talk:Atu|talk]]) 16:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC) This is not only a protest to the US government, this is an act to inform people in the the word who knows nothing (or very little) about SOPA. A global blackout sends the stronger message, and I'm afraid it may be not big enough for the guys upstairs.
#'''Support''' full blackout, U.S. only. ... [[User:discospinster|'''disco''''''''spinster''''']] [[User talk:discospinster|'''talk''']] 16:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. full blackout. [[User:Philtime|Philtime]] ([[User talk:Philtime|talk]]) 16:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Half-handed measures are just that. Let's shake the world. --[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus| talk to me]] 16:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Onecallednick|Onecallednick]] ([[User talk:Onecallednick|talk]]) 16:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' (applicable only to US, see my vote in 1.1). [[User:Bk1 168|Bk1 168]] ([[User talk:Bk1 168|talk]]) 16:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support'''. (Except for pages about SOPA, PIPA, et al.) When I donated to WP this past donation drive, I knew I was not buying share in it. But I think it's still relevant. In any case, as many people have said, we internet users are so very accustomed to and trained by click-through screens and banner ads. I support a global, full blackout. If SOPA passes, won't ''it'' propagate through the entire world? I envision it as a one-day teaser of what ''could'' happen if SOPA and similar laws start passing in the United States. The vast majority of computer users don't know what an IP is, let alone how they would discover WP's. We need to make ''everyone'' see how important user-submitted content is, and WP is absolutely an example of this! The articles on SOPA, PIPA, et al should remain open, however. — [[Special:Contributions/Cognatus|chirographa]] [[User talk:Cognatus|diverbia]] [[User:Cognatus|cognatō]] 16:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Global and full. [[User:Rm1271|'''Rm1271''']] [[User talk:Rm1271|talk]][[Special:Contributions/Rm1271|contribs]] 16:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The purpose of this action is to give people a taste of what censorship is really like, and to make sure that this hits every major news organization. Half-measures won't cut it. [[User:Wonderstruck|Wonderstruck]] ([[User talk:Wonderstruck|talk]]) 16:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support a full blackout (meaning black screen and info text on a global scale) to really raise public awareness, a click through banner is not an option in my opinion as people using computers are trained to click such things away (pop ups, warning/error messages, you name it ... ). About 10 years ago, there was a time where people were able to live without Wikipedia and noones live should depend on Wikipedia. As an alternative I'd suggest to just block out the "G8" nations, as I think that they're the ones who are affected, but not beeing consequently means that some people still can access wikipedia (via proxy) and others can't ... [[User:Mirrakor|Mirrakor]] ([[User talk:Mirrakor|talk]]) 16:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:A.Savin|A.Savin]] ([[User talk:A.Savin|talk]]) 16:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Coleopterist|Coleopterist]] ([[User talk:Coleopterist|talk]]) I support a full blackout of wikipedia and as many other services as possible; let people realise the value of the resources being threatened by legislation like this 16:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout worldwide''' We should show the world what is SOPA and what it can be. The blackout page must be easily understood, informative and contrasting compared to Wikipedia's usual design style and color scheme. [[User:Rev-san|Rev L. Snowfox]] ([[User talk:Rev-san|talk]]) 16:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Full Global blackout. [[User:Wikien2009|Wikien2009]] ([[User talk:Wikien2009|talk]]) 16:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Facta non verba. ''—[[User:Mzajac |Michael]] [[User talk:Mzajac |Z.]] 2012-01-15 16:54 z''
#'''Support''' Full blackout is the only thing that is likely to have significant impact. --[[User:Daniel J. Leivick|Daniel]] 16:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Gabi83tm|Gabi83tm]] ([[User talk:Gabi83tm|talk]]) 16:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The blackout must be global and it must close off the entire site for the duration - no editing, searching or viewing of anything other than the blackout information page. [[User:Tiller54|Tiller54]] ([[User talk:Tiller54|talk]]) 16:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. I think people in other countries need to know how this can affect wikipedia and raise awarness [[User:JayJay|JayJay]][[User talk:JayJay|Talk to me]] 17:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Full blackout, I'd support both US-only or Global. In any case, full, and not just a banner. It's the feeling of not having a Wikipedia the strong message, not a random banner that will just be quickly skipped with no further effect. --[[User:Samer.hc|Samer.hc]] ([[User talk:Samer.hc|talk]]) 17:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Idealy world wide but also U.S. only. Victory thorugh action and sacrifice. [[User:Urholygod|Urholygod]] ([[User talk:Urholygod|talk]]) 17:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Saehrimnir|Saehrimnir]] ([[User talk:Saehrimnir|talk]]) 17:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Global.--[[User:Cattus|Cattus]] [[User talk:Cattus|talk]] 17:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' prefer full global blackout, sends a strong message that Wikipedia is against SOPA--[[User:Wikigold96|Wikigold96]] ([[User talk:Wikigold96|talk]]) 17:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Full blackout to show what it would be like if SOPA was passed. [[User:Someguy432|Someguy432]] ([[User talk:Someguy432|talk]]) 17:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support full blackout'''--[[User:Neon97|Neon97]] ([[User talk:Neon97|talk]]) 17:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Full global blackout. [[User:Haukurth|Haukur]] ([[User talk:Haukurth|talk]]) 17:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support a full-blackout. In my opinion, although it affects primarily the US, due to its global hegemony, many other countries - like mine (Romania) - will follow through (willingly or not). The Internet must remain free! [[User:mrk89tm|Marko]] 17:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Full global blackout, '''but''' with access to Wikipedia's SOPA and PIPA pages. [[User:MusicaleCA|MusicaleCA]] ([[User talk:MusicaleCA|talk]]) 17:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Because of the ramifications this bill will have on Wikipedia and the potential chilling affects we must make a strong stand as a community before it is too late. I support a full global blackout. --[[User:BHC|BHC]] ([[User talk:BHC|talk]]) 17:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- full global blackout. [[User:NotFromUtrecht|NotFromUtrecht]] ([[User talk:NotFromUtrecht|talk]]) 17:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I think that not having Wikipedia for one day, while it has its repercussions, greatly outweighs the possibility of never having Wikipedia again. And I think this is something its global audience should be informed of. '''EricLeb01 ([[User:Ericleb01|Page]] | [[User talk:Ericleb01|Talk]])''' 17:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' Full Worldwide Blackout [[User:Zamadatix|Zamadatix]] ([[User talk:Zamadatix|talk]]) 17:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' Full Worldwide Blackout. [[User:Mavromatis|Mavromatis]] ([[User talk:Mavromatis|talk]]) 17:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Full Worldwide Blackout --[[User:Mlorer|Mlorer]] ([[User talk:Mlorer|talk]]) 17:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Full Worldwide Blackout. [[User:RobleQuieto|RobleQuieto]] ([[User talk:RobleQuieto|talk]]) 18:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' If you take a step back and look at the full picture, globally, most of the world does not even know SOPA is on the table. Global support is critical.[[User:Thisandthem|Thisandthem]] ([[User talk:Thisandthem|talk]]) 18:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full global blackout.--[[User:Ragesoss|Ragesoss]] ([[User talk:Ragesoss|talk]]) 18:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:LeedsHK16|LeedsHK16]] ([[User talk:LeedsHK16|talk]]) 18:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The internet is global, the protest should be global. =//= [[User:Johnny Squeaky|Johnny Squeaky]] 18:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Full Global Blackout. [[User:CaseyBurkhardt|CaseyBurkhardt]] 18:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support US only full blackout'''. It is a US law and shouldn't affect others. --[[User:Konero26|Konero26]] ([[User talk:Konero26|talk]]) 18:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Danielkueh|danielkueh]] ([[User talk:Danielkueh|talk]]) 18:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Full global blackout. We need it. [[User:CPnieuws|CPnieuws]] ([[User talk:CPnieuws|talk]]) 18:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support global blackout''' as first choice, global click-through if not. Although it will be extremely devastating and inconvenient for people around the world, everyone needs to be aware of this, otherwise they will just click the "Continue" link and not bother about it; plus, it gives people a taste of what it's like not to have free information available to them with a few clicks. 18:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support global blackout'''. [[User:Slartibartfastibast|Slartibartfastibast]] ([[User talk:Slartibartfastibast|talk]]) 19:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support global blackout'''. The core architecture of the Internet is located in the United States; the proposed laws affect the world even though they only directly govern U.S. possessions. [[User:Rogue 9|Rogue 9]] ([[User talk:Rogue 9|talk]]) 19:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''-- Go big or go home. We have one big card, if we're going to play it, let's play it. Blacking out globally is a huge step, but this is a time for huge steps, while there's still time for huge steps to affect things. --[[User:HectorMoffet|HectorMoffet]] ([[User talk:HectorMoffet|talk]]) 19:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Arno Matthias|Arno Matthias]] ([[User talk:Arno Matthias|talk]]) 19:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full blackout (US-only or global - that's a different question, above), if that's how we want to do this. I think it makes a stronger statement. — '''[[User:SMcCandlish|SMcCandlish]]''' [[User talk:SMcCandlish|Talk⇒]] ʕ(Õلō)ˀ [[Special:Contributions/SMcCandlish|Contribs]]. 19:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support global blackout''' as first choice, global click-through if not. Although it will be extremely devastating and inconvenient for people around the world, everyone needs to be aware of this, otherwise they will just click the "Continue" link and not bother about it; plus, it gives people a taste of what it's like not to have free information available to them with a few clicks. [[User:Ajmint|''' ajmint ''']] ([[User talk:Ajmint|talk]] •[[Special:Contributions/ajmint|edits]]) 19:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support global black-out''' --[[User:Chmee2|Chmee2]] ([[User talk:Chmee2|talk]]) 19:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Osric|Osric]] ([[User talk:Osric|talk]]) 19:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' [[User:Bastun|Bastun]][[User_talk:Bastun|Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!]] 19:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. A global blackout is needed. [[User:Angelikfire|Angelikfire]] ([[User talk:Angelikfire|talk]]) 19:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout'''. [[User:Pym1507]] 19:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Strong support (global)'''. If you're going to make a statement, might as well make a bold one. -[[User:Ryan-D|'''ryan''']][[User:Ryan-D/Talk|'''''d''''']] 19:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' (global) [[User:Waldir|Waldir]] [[User talk:Waldir|talk]] 19:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' (US-only) We shouln't merely have a banner when other sites are going dark completely. However, we've no right to bring the whole world into this. --[[User:Hacky|hacky]] ([[User talk:Hacky|talk]]) 19:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' (global), the impact this US legislation could have on all users of Wikipedia makes it clear a global blackout is the best way stand firm on this issue. –[[User:TheIguana|'''TheIguana''']] ([[User talk:TheIguana|talk]]) 20:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' - [[User:CTZMSC3|ctzmsc3]]|[[User talk:CTZMSC3|talk]] 20:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'' - This will affect the entire world.--[[User:Gilderien|Gilderien]] [[User talk:Gilderien|Talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Gilderien|Contribs]] 20:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - --[[User:Midasminus|Midasminus]] ([[User talk:Midasminus|talk]]) 20:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Strong Support'''. While Wikipedia will likely get off easy compared to other sites, we shouldn't hesitate to show the full scale of what SOPA can do across the rest of the web. --[[User:Thejadefalcon|Thejadefalcon]][[User talk:Thejadefalcon|''Sing your song'']][[Special:Contributions/Thejadefalcon|''The bird's seeds'']] 20:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full and global blackout'''. [[User:Enchilado|Enchilado]] ([[User talk:Enchilado|talk]]) 20:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support global blackout''' One day is a small price to pay. [[User:Xero Xenith|Xero Xenith]] ([[User talk:Xero Xenith|talk]]) 20:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support global blackout''' --'''[[User:Ipstenu|Ipstenu]]''' ''([[User talk:Ipstenu|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ipstenu|contribs]])'' 20:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Global. - [[User:Davecrosby uk|Dave Crosby]] ([[User talk:Davecrosby uk|talk]]) 20:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support Global'''. --[[User:Kizar|Kizar]] ([[User talk:Kizar|talk]]) 20:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''-- This is the option that would clearly result in the widest public attention, and so I support this strongest option if consensus of editors agrees. I support ''all'' options for a high-profile public statement against SOPA, although I understand the concerns of those editors who oppose the protest. I believe that this threat goes to the core of Wikipedia's mission, and that opposition to Wikipedia becoming a general political advocate ought not to prevent opposition to particular measures, such as SOPA, that might make it impossible for Wikipedia to exist in its current form. [[User:Cullen328|'''Cullen'''328]] [[User talk:Cullen328|''Let's discuss it'']] 20:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full global blackout. —[[User:TheDJ|TheDJ]] ([[User talk:TheDJ|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TheDJ|contribs]]) 20:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' global blackout. [[User:Gobonobo|Gobonobo]] [[User_talk:Gobonobo|T]] [[Special:Contributions/Gobonobo|C]] 20:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' and '''redirect''' to website warning of the dangers of SOPA. - [[User:NarSakSasLee|NarSakSasLee]] ([[User talk:NarSakSasLee|talk]]) 21:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full global blackout, to make the strongest possible statement in solidarity with other protesting websites. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]]) 21:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full worldwide blackout''' For all the great reasons given here.--[[User:Olsdude|Matt D]] ([[User talk:Olsdude|talk]]) 03:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:J. Finkelstein|J. Finkelstein]] ([[User talk:J. Finkelstein|talk]]) 21:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''support''' full global blackout.—[[User:pumkinjuice]] ([[User talk:pumkinjuice|talk]] 17:08, 15 January 2012 (GMT)
#'''Support Strongly'''. [[User:pratstercs|Pratstercs]][[User_talk:pratstercs|Talk to me]] 21:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support.''' [[User:Fifelfoo|Fifelfoo]] ([[User talk:Fifelfoo|talk]]) 21:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support.''' full global blackout [[User:Coryboy6|Coryboy6]] ([[User talk:Coryboy6|talk]]) 21:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support.''' Just add a link to some petition/advocate group to divert people to take action [[User:Chiefmartinez|Chiefmartinez]] ([[User talk:Chiefmartinez|talk]]) 21:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I support the harshest global action (for 12-24 hours). People who have urgent need of information will still be able to access it through filtered/ad-filled mirrors (which will perhaps strengthen the effect). [[User:Falcor84|"Six by nine. Forty two." ]] ([[User talk:Falcor84|talk]]) 21:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. We need to show our devotion to the opposition of this bill, so I say full blackout --[[User:GeekofGames51|GeekofGames51]] ([[User talk:GeekofGames51|talk]]) 21:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full global blackout. [[User:Strobilomyces|Strobilomyces]] ([[User talk:Strobilomyces|talk]]) 22:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full global blackout for wide public perception. [[User:Rathgemz|Rathgemz]] ([[User talk:Rathgemz|talk]]) 22:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:JohnWilliams|JohnWilliams]] ([[User talk:JohnWilliams|talk]]) 22:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Full global blackout - this is about generating the maximum world wide media pressure. Embarassing congress is the best weapon WP has. --[[User:Narson|'''Narson''']] ~ [[User_talk:Narson|''Talk'']] • 22:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Do it right the first time: Full site blackout for a period of 24 hours, leaving only some information about SOPA. '''Yoenit''' ([[user talk:Yoenit|talk]]) 22:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Let's take our bat and ball. [[User_talk:Josh Parris|Josh Parris]] 22:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Global. The only page that should be unblocked should be the page for SOPA, so people can still use wikipedia for information about the blackout. 22:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' all the way! [[User:NeuroE|NeuroE]] ([[User talk:NeuroE|talk]]) 22:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''; as an awareness-raising method, the best thing would be for ''every'' incoming link being caught. (Think ''search results'' and you'll see why). — [[User:Coren|Coren]] [[User Talk:Coren|(talk)]] 22:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full global blackout. [[User:cmbook2|cmbook2]]
# '''Support'''. Global. As someone said before: 'The only page that should be unblocked should be the page for SOPA, so people can still use wikipedia for information about the blackout.' Furthermore, I feel that whenever freedom of expression/civil liberties are threatened wikipedia must take a stand! The future of the site depends of it. The NDAA should've never passed. Open information and protests can prevent a Tyrannical government, I urge you to protest the NDAA as well- ethanwashere [[User:Ethanwashere|Ethanwashere]] ([[User talk:Ethanwashere|talk]]) 22:37, 15 January 2012‎ (UTC)
#'''Support''' global full blackout of the site. Also OK with options 1 and 2, but strongly prefer this one. --[[User:Demiurge1000|Demiurge1000]] ([[User_talk:Demiurge1000|talk]]) 22:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Slow Riot|Slow Riot]] ([[User talk:Slow Riot|talk]]) 22:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Global. [[User:Bunnyboi|Bunnyboi]] ([[User talk:Bunnyboi|talk]]) 22:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Full global blackout. [[User:Pol430|'''Pol430''']] [[User talk:Pol430|''talk to me'']] 22:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Strongly support. US only. [[User:Ruxda|Ruxda]] ([[User talk:Ruxda|talk]]) 23:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' global blackout. [[User:Mlm42|Mlm42]] ([[User talk:Mlm42|talk]]) 23:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support global blackout''' People from all over the world could benefit from learning about SOPA because eventually they may have to face similar legislation too. To raise awareness, I don't see anything like informative banners to be enough. A full blackout would do, I think. Not for a few minutes or even a day either. Start with a full week. [[User:Saveur|Saveur]] ([[User talk:Saveur|talk]]) 23:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Nubzor|Nubzor]] ([[User talk:Nubzor|talk]]) 23:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:JetBlast|JetBlast]] ([[User talk:JetBlast|talk]]) 23:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' US only full blackout. [[User:Owencm|Owencm]] ([[User talk:Owencm|talk]]) 23:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This would be an unequivocal statement. [[User:Mighty Antar|Mighty Antar]] ([[User talk:Mighty Antar|talk]]) 23:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Global full blackout [[User:Busha5a5a5|Busha5a5a5]] ([[User talk:Busha5a5a5|talk]]) 23:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Global, SOPA will unfortunately affect a global audience, the message should be global as well, and not just something people ignore and click through. - '''[[User:Cohesion|cohesion]]''' 23:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Any political action—which make no mistake, this is what this protest boils down to—is the equivalent of swinging the [[Big Stick ideology|big stick]] for us. Doing a half-assed swing of the stick removes the power inherent in the Wikipedia community taking a stance on anything. As such, swing the stick all the way, with a full global blackout. [[User:Titoxd|Titoxd]]([[User talk:Titoxd|?!?]] - [[WP:FAC|cool stuff]]) 23:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Very Strongly Support'''. - [[User:EmJayCrawford|EmJayCrawford]] ([[User talk:EmJayCrawford|talk]]) 23:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Any political action—which make no mistake, this is what this protest boils down to—is the equivalent of swinging the [[Big Stick ideology|big stick]] for us. Doing a half-assed swing of the stick removes the power inherent in the Wikipedia community taking a stance on anything. As such, swing the stick all the way, with a full global blackout. [[User:Titoxd|Titoxd]]([[User talk:Titoxd|?!?]] - [[WP:FAC|cool stuff]]) 23:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I suggest a full blackout of most regular content with a clickthrough to substantial amount of info on SOPA as well as related issues as selected by an empowered panel of respected editors. Give frustrated ppl a chance to learn some things. Full blackout makes the strongest possible statement & will be a wakeup call to the people of the world in what looks to be a historic year of global activism and global debate. [[User:Praghmatic|Praghmatic]] ([[User talk:Praghmatic|talk]]) 23:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Full global blackout and banner. [[User:Julianhall|Julianhall]] ([[User talk:Julianhall|talk]]) 23:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Full blackout, maximize impact. [[User:ZoneSeek|ZoneSeek]] ([[User talk:ZoneSeek|talk]])
#'''Support'''. Global full blackout - and give visitors information about SOPA, including ways to help.
# '''Support'''. [[User:Jandalhandler|Jandalhandler]] ([[User talk:Jandalhandler|talk]]) 00:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Global full blackout. Wikipedia is one of the few websites that won't be preaching to the choir. While the impacts of such legislation are global, there's little the rest of the world can do about it. On a second thought, a global blackout would be a good way to illustrate the need for a decentralized control of the internet so things like this can't happen to it. — [[User:Kieff|Kieff]] | [[User_talk:Kieff|Talk]] 00:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Worldwide blackout. [[User:Devil Master|Devil Master]] ([[User talk:Devil Master|talk]]) 00:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' --[[User:Rumba y Son|Rumba y Son]] ([[User talk:Rumba y Son|talk]]) 00:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support US-only blackout''' except for the [[SOPA]] and [[PIPA]] pages. I'd also argue that those pages should be semiprotected to prevent tons of vandalism. [[User:Fred Foobar|Fred]] ([[User talk:Fred Foobar|talk]]) 00:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:CartoonDiablo|CartoonDiablo]] ([[User talk:CartoonDiablo|talk]]) 00:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Phauxcamus|Phaux'']] ([[User talk:Phauxcamus|talk]]) 00:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Vestonian|Vestonian]] ([[User talk:Vestonian|talk]]) 00:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Vestonian}}
#'''Support global''': global total blackout, but with targeted explanation per country and/or language (SOPA for US, HADOPI/LOPPSI for France, and so on) —[[User:Jérémie Bouillon|Jérémie Bouillon]] ([[User talk:Jérémie Bouillon|talk]]) 00:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Jérémie Bouillon}}
#'''Support''' worldwide blackout. Politicians need to learn this lesson. [[User:Thparkth|Thparkth]] ([[User_Talk:Thparkth|talk]]) 00:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' international, countries look to one another for abilities to push this type of legislation - and an international push-back is the best way to let all governments know that we do not support this type of legislation in any country. [[User:Skier Dude|Skier Dude]] ([[User_talk:Skier Dude|talk]]) 00:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' global blackout. '''[[User:NereusAJ|NereusAJ]] ([[User talk:NereusAJ|T]] | [[Special:Contributions/NereusAJ|C]])''' 00:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' – [[User:Smyth|Smyth]]\[[User talk:Smyth|talk]] 00:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' – [[User:Walliver|Walliver]]\[[User talk:Walliver|talk]] 00:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Tr1290|Tr1290]] ([[User talk:Tr1290|talk]]) 00:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support a global blackout of the site. [[User:Jesant13|Jesant13]] ([[User talk:Jesant13|talk]]) 00:38, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Flexxx|Flexxx]] ([[User talk:Flexxx|talk]]) 00:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' full blackout, or failing that, an English-language blackout. [[Special:Contributions/82.8.212.40|82.8.212.40]] ([[User talk:82.8.212.40|talk]]) 00:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|82.8.212.40}}
#'''Support'''. Let's go all in, full global blackout, all users. This will generate the most publicity and press. [[User:First Light|First Light]] ([[User talk:First Light|talk]]) 00:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' One total global blackout to go, please. [[User:Spaceshuttlediscovery|Spaceshuttlediscovery]] ([[User talk:Spaceshuttlediscovery|talk]]) 00:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I go with the consensus on this [[User:Trev M|Trev M ]] [[User_talk:Trev_M|~ ]] 00:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. Full blackout is the best option here [[User:ExplorerPlus|ExplorerPlus]] ([[User talk:ExplorerPlus|talk]]) 00:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. SOPA will effect the entire internet, even outside of the US - a global blackout is necessary to show just how terrible it would be. [[User:NessSnorlax|NessSnorlax]] ([[User talk:NessSnorlax|talk]]) 01:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' People have to realize the repercussions of the passing of such a bill. The bill could eventually lead to a blackout of content anyway for users accessing from certain countries. Anything that would make it more difficult for wikipedia to have its servers located in the USA is bad wikipedia and English speaking users since I don't think there's a better host nation.[[User:Grmike|Grmike]] ([[User talk:Grmike|talk]]) 01:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)grmike
#'''Strong Support'''. [[User:Atomic7732|atomic]][[User_talk:atomic7732|77]][[User:Atomic7732/2010_List_of_Cyclones|32]] 01:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' A soft blackout is pointless.--[[User:Metallurgist|Metallurgist]] ([[User talk:Metallurgist|talk]]) 01:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full, global blackout'''. If we're going to send a message about SOPA, we should go all in on it. The free and open Internet must be preserved. [[User:Grondemar|–]][[User talk:Grondemar|Grondemar]] 01:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Ltr,ftw|Ltr,ftw]] ([[User talk:Ltr,ftw|talk]]) 01:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Styko|Styko]] ([[User talk:Styko|talk]]) 01:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Styko}}
#'''Strongly support'''. [[User:Afamberry|Afamberry]] ([[User talk:Afamberry|talk]]) 01:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''-- [[User:R'son-W|R'son-W]] [[User_talk:R'son-W|(speak to me]]/[[Special:Emailuser/R'son-W|breathe)]] 01:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full blackout. [[User:Aron.Foster|Aron.Foster]] ([[User talk:Aron.Foster|talk]]) 01:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' for a full, unilateral, and unconditional blackout. As to why, I'll let [[Mario Savio]] answer that question: "''There's a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious—makes you so sick at heart—that you can't take part. You can't even passively take part. And you've got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you've got to make it stop. And you've got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it that unless you're free, the machine will be prevented from working at all.''" [[User:TomStar81|TomStar81]] ([[User talk:TomStar81|Talk]]) 01:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Full Blackout would be the most effective. [[User:Omegastar|Omegastar]] ([[User talk:Omegastar|talk]]) 01:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' A worldwide full blackout I think will be the best option. [[User:Usb10|Usb10]] [[User talk:Usb10|plug me in]] 02:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Hubertl-AT|Hubertl-AT]] ([[User talk:Hubertl-AT|talk]]) 02:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Hubertl-AT}}
#'''Support'''. Needs to be substantial. [[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 02:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' »[[User:Nmajdan|NMajdan]]·[[User talk:Nmajdan|talk]] 02:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Noleander|Noleander]] ([[User talk:Noleander|talk]]) 02:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Global blackout. SOPA will have global effects, and thus should be brought to the attention of people around the globe. [[User:EvilHom3r|EvilHom3r]] ([[User talk:EvilHom3r|talk]]) 02:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' This will be the most effective way of demonstrating the potential impacts SOPA could have on Wikipedia and the [[World wide web|WWW]] as a whole. We must get tough on protesting this bill in order for our actions to be recognized. [[User:Kinaro|'''Kinaro''']][[User talk:Kinaro|(say hello)''']] [[Special:Contributions/Kinaro|(what's been done)]] 02:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full global blackout for a global issue. [[User:Starship.paint|Starship.paint]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|talk]]) 02:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Ultimate77|Ultimate77]] ([[User talk:Ultimate77|talk]]) 02:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full, global blackout''' We need to blackout fully so we can make sure people in the U.S. know about SOPA and don't just try and find ways around the blackout. In addition, it may also show other nations to not be this idiotic, and not to adopt any similar legislation (if they already haven't). [[User:Gthib14|Gthib14]] ([[User talk:Gthib14|talk]]) 02:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout, worldwide''' It's for the best, it's one of the most important issues we have faced. [[User:Poydflink|Poydflink]] ([[User talk:Poydflink|talk]]) 02:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Poydflink}}
#'''Support'''. Full black out is needed! people need to know what it's like living in a world where censorship is the norm. Even if it's just for a moment.[[User:Cabal2122|Cabal2122]] ([[User talk:Cabal2122|talk]]) 02:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Cabal2122}}
#'''Support''' If we're going to do a blackout, we should go all the way [[User:Gee totes|Gee totes]] ([[User talk:Gee totes|talk]]) 02:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' – [[User:Sapphire Dragon777|Sapphire Dragon777]] ([[User talk:Sapphire Dragon777|talk]]) 02:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Nessman|Nessman]] ([[User talk:Nessman|talk]]) 02:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' - Nothing short of our duty as a community. ''[[User:Swarm|Swarm]]'' [[User talk:Swarm|X]] 03:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support Full, Global Blackout''' [[User:Accountingkid|Accountingkid]] ([[User talk:Accountingkid|talk]]) 03:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support Full Global Blackout''' - This is the best way to get the information out to the world
#'''Strongly Support Global Blackout''' Will make people realize how serious this is. [[User:Henriwatson|Henri Watson]] ([[User talk:Henriwatson|talk]]) 03:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User: Gryllida|Gryllida]] 03:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' - This issue affects all Wikipedia's worldwide so it should be a global blackout. [[User:SpeakFree|'''S'''peak'''F'''ree]] [[User talk:SpeakFree|(talk)]]([[Special:Contributions/SpeakFree|contribs]]) 03:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#<big>'''Strongest Support of them All''' </big> Agree with all of the supporters [[User:Yrtneg|--]][[user:yrtneg|'''yrtneg''']] ([[User talk:Yrtneg|talk]]) [[Wikipedia:SOPA initiative/Action|STOP SOPA NOW!]] 03:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#Most effective way. [[User:Timeu|Timeu]] ([[User talk:Timeu|talk]]) 03:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Extreme Strong Support''' Global shut down for a day of Wikipedia site replaced with "protest message" against Congressman Lamar Smith, the RIAA and the MPAA. This issue is for the survival of the Internet which overrides any neutrality concerns. The United States Does not own the Internet. [[User:Magnum Serpentine|Magnum Serpentine]] ([[User talk:Magnum Serpentine|talk]]) 03:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Revelian|Revelian]] ([[User talk:Revelian|talk]]) 03:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' – The founding of Wikipedia was a political statement. Each time a user contributes, he or she makes a political statement: "This information should be freely available." To me, blacking out Wikipedia is a continuation of the political statement that its founders made in creating it and that each of its users have made by contributing. [[User:Maxterpiece|Maxterpiece]] ([[User talk:Maxterpiece|talk]]) 03:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support Full Global Blackout''' - Would it be NPOV if IP holders had the right to stop payment processing to Wikipedia? We are not writing an article. This is real life, and a matter that affects not only Wikipedia and the United States, but the entire world. --[[User:Elephanthunter|Elephanthunter]] ([[User talk:Elephanthunter|talk]]) 03:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' - Most powerful method to practically demonstrate the full consequence that SOPA would have. [[User:EryZ|EryZ]] ([[User talk:EryZ|talk]]) 03:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support of Global Blackout'''. [[User:Someonesmask|Someonesmask]] ([[User talk:Someonesmask|talk]]) 03:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support (global)'''. --[[User:Chris5858|'''Chris''']][[User talk:Chris5858|'''5858''']] 04:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support(global)'''. [[User:Benjaih|Benjaih]] ([[User talk:Benjaih|talk]]) 04:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support of Global Blackout'''. [[User:Twang|Twang]] ([[User talk:Twang|talk]]) 04:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Full Support of Global Blackout'''. [[User:Nosrepa|Nosrepa]] ([[User talk:Nosrepa|talk]]) 04:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support (Global)''' While the SOPA bill needs to be defeated, it is also important to raise global awareness regarding this type of legislation. [[User: Unomi|u]][[Special:Contributions/Unomi|n☯]][[User talk:Unomi |mi]] 04:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:CheShA|CheShA]] ([[User talk:CheShA|talk]]) 04:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support for full global blackout'''. [[User:Spookiewon|Spookiewon]] ([[User talk:Spookiewon|talk]]) 04:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support, with the option mentioned in the section [[#Access to SOPA and a handful of directly-related articles]]'''. While I know doing a hard blackout would be violating[[WP:SOAPBOX]], this is a case where we can (''and very well should'') use [[WP:IAR]]. SOPA is a serious threat to Wikipedia. Since [[WP:SOAPBOX]] stands in the way of us protesting against that threat, we should ignore the !@#$% out of that rule {{=)|wink}} That said, we should provide curious users with access to the article[[SOPA]], as well as some other related ones, to provide them with more in-depth and informative (and hopefully neutral{{=)|wink}}) material on SOPA, etc., in article form and with related[[WP:EL|ELs]]. — Preceding ''signed'' comment added by[[User:Cymru.lass|Cymru.lass]] ([[User talk:Cymru.lass|talk]] •[[Special:Contributions/Cymru.lass|contribs]]) 01:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#: +1 for [[Wikipedia:Ignore all rules]]! When the USA government wants to violate the Constitution, and the courts are asked to rule on it, they frequently state that [[the Constitution is not a suicide pact]]. We can, and should, respond in kind. Playing the hero who is straight as an arrow and never bends his principles is what Superman does on TV, and what sour losers do in real life. [[User:Badon|Badon]] ([[User talk:Badon|talk]]) 04:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Laxrippe|Laxrippe]] ([[User talk:Laxrippe|talk]]) 04:25, 16 January 2012‎ (UTC)
#'''Strong Support of Global Blackout'''. All possible pressure must be brought, including international.[[User:glorytothehypnotoad|glorytothehypnotoad]] ([[User talk:glorytothehypnotoad|talk]]) 04:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Glorytothehypnotoad}}
#'''Support full global blackout'''--[[User:Taylornate|Taylornate]] ([[User talk:Taylornate|talk]]) 04:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''-- Very strongly support! While it is a US issue, it will have many repercussions globally and we can't let this fall by the wayside until it is too late!
#'''Support full global blackout'''-- Canadian here, and I support a full blackout. --[[User:Slokunshialgo|Slokunshialgo]] ([[User talk:Slokunshialgo|talk]]) 04:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' A global blackout! ([[User:Tigerghost|Tigerghost]] ([[User talk:Tigerghost|talk]]) 04:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC))
#'''Support''' global blackout. [[User:Xerographica|Xerographica]] ([[User talk:Xerographica|talk]]) 04:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' The best way to send a strong message is to let folks see first-hand how much of an impact the passage of this legislation might have. --[[User:Paincess|Paincess]] ([[User talk:Paincess|talk]]) 05:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. I agree with the main reasons for a full blackout. The message must be clear and strong. --[[User:BloodyRose|Bloody Rose]] ([[User talk:BloodyRose|talk]]) 04:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' global blackout. [[User:Blackchaos93]] 04:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:EvanProdromou|ESP]] ([[User talk:EvanProdromou|talk]]) 05:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' A US-only full blackout, though a possible soft blackout to garner international attention and support. [[User:JamesL1618|JamesL1618]] 05:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Super Hella Strong Support''' Corporations are global entities. They need to know that SOPA-like legislation is unacceptable everywhere. Our global comrades need to be made aware what we are up against. [[User_talk:Saudade7|Saudade7]] 05:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# Desperate times call for desperate measures. [[User:Steven Zhang|Steven]] [[User talk:Steven Zhang|Zhang]] [[WP:DRP|Join the DR army!]] 05:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Very Strong Support''' [[User:Qasaur|Qasaur]] ([[User talk:Qasaur|talk]]) 05:19, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Unary|Unary]] ([[User talk:Unary|talk]]) 05:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full global blackout to make a very clear, strong point! [[User:Toastedonions|Toastedonions]] ([[User talk:Toastedonions|talk]]) 05:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full global blackout, but have a message explaining the blackout. This is our time to learn to overcome real adversity.— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:174.100.42.9|174.100.42.9]] ([[User talk:174.100.42.9|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/174.100.42.9|contribs]]) 05:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Global blackout. Not an American, and I feel this issue needs to be raised here and now before the US tries to impose this entirely unsound internet regulation on the world. I agree that the page must have an explaination for the blackout and link to resources for those who want to learn more. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:D4nmur101|D4nmur101]] ([[User talk:D4nmur101|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/D4nmur101|contribs]]) 05:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Jovianeye|Jovian Eye]] [[User talk:Jovianeye|storm]] 05:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''100% Support''' for a full, global blackout on that date. The ramifications of SOPA will be international, not just domestic. Therefore pressure against it should also be on an international scale. [[User:Melicans|Melicans]] ([[User talk:Melicans|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/Melicans|contributions]]) 05:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full blackout. Doubtless, the propaganda machine of the American far-right will accuse Wikipedians of being evil communist subversives for even having this debate. What else is new?! Screw them, screw their disinformation, it's time to say "enough is enough". [[User:Suriel1981|ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹]][[User talk:Suriel1981|Speak]] 05:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support'''--[[User:Ot|ot]] ([[User talk:Ot|talk]]) 05:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. We can go without Wikipedia for a day; we can't go on with SOPA in effect. Let's throw our weight around. [[User:The Frederick|The Frederick]] ([[User talk:The Frederick|talk]]) 06:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' for full global blackout. SOPA will have international consequences, not just domestic. [[User:Idreamincode|Idreamincode]] ([[User talk:Idreamincode|talk]]) 06:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' I'm Canadian and I strongly support a full blackout on January 18th. We have to take actions against SOPA and I'm glad Wikipedia take part of those. I'll miss you for a day, but people need to know. In the hope of not seeing you next wednesday :). — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:24.200.59.169|24.200.59.169]] ([[User talk:24.200.59.169|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/24.200.59.169|contribs]]) 06:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I am a global citizen and I see SOPA affecting all internet users.— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Pezaad|Pezaad]] ([[User talk:Pezaad|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Pezaad|contribs]]) 06:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. [[User:Shimmshaw|Shimmshaw]] ([[User talk:Shimmshaw|talk]]) 06:19, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout.''' [[Special:Contributions/160.39.166.43|160.39.166.43]] ([[User talk:160.39.166.43|talk]]) 06:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Total Support'''. Only a full, global total blackout will force people to sit up and take notice. It's easy to click through a link, and SOPA will affect users worldwide. [[User:Datapolitical|Datapolitical]] ([[User talk:Datapolitical|talk]]) 06:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' Only way to have a significant importance in the SOPA debate --[[User:Wagaf-d|Wagaf-d]] ([[User talk:Wagaf-d|talk]]) 06:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' Great way to spread awareness of SOPA to people who have no idea what it is (more than you would expect) [[User:Bramson|Bramson]] ([[User talk:Bramson|talk]]) 06:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' The public needs to understand the ramifications of what would happen if SOPA/PIPA passed. A full-blown blackout will send a very strong wake-up call to those who aren't fully aware yet of the dangers these bills have. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Surging Chaos|Surging Chaos]] ([[User talk:Surging Chaos|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Surging Chaos|contribs]]) 06:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' It won't mean anything unless Google, Facebook and Wikipedia all jump on board. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:68.41.232.72|68.41.232.72]] ([[User talk:68.41.232.72|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/68.41.232.72|contribs]]) 06:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' I do not think that a half-hearted splash page would effectively communicate the message. [[User:Quinling|Harlequin]] ([[User talk:Quinling|talk]]) 06:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support''' for full blackout, internet legislation does not threaten to "take an extra click with an ad", it threatens to remove information....let's get a taste of how draconian that is [[User:Al-Fozail ibn Iyaz|Al-Fozail ibn Iyaz]] ([[User talk:Al-Fozail ibn Iyaz|talk]]) 06:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Cakedamber|Cakedamber]] ([[User talk:Cakedamber|talk]]) 06:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. UK resident here. Fully support total blackout to raise awareness of SOPA. If America enacts it, the UK is soon to follow suit. —Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/87.115.65.24|87.115.65.24]] ([[User talk:87.115.65.24|talk]]) 07:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This blackout has my full support, I think more websites and organizations need to use this option as well, to help further raise awareness. —Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/108.87.132.47|108.87.132.47]] ([[User talk:108.87.132.47|talk]]) 07:07, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Any effect that SOPA has on any web page will affect the rest of the world. This includes Wikipedia. --[[User:Dennisthe2|'''Dennis The Tiger''']] ([[User talk:Dennisthe2|Rawr]] and [[Special:Contributions/Dennisthe2|stuff]]) 07:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full '''global''' blackout. [[User:WHLfan|WHLfan]] ([[User talk:WHLfan|talk]]) 07:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support a US blackout to spread awareness. A soft-blackout is far too weak and will appear as another annoying message that users are trained to click though without reading.—[[User:DMCer|'''DMCer''']][[User_talk:DMCer|™]] 07:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Suport'''. I wavered quite a bit between a full blackout and a soft "click-through" one, but I eventually settled on full. I feel it will be a far more effective demonstration of the direness of the situation. --[[User:Foolishgrunt|Foolishgrunt]] ([[User talk:Foolishgrunt|talk]]) 07:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Dtyger|Dtyger]] ([[User talk:Dtyger|talk]]) 07:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' We need to stop this bill. Everyone uses wikipedia needs to be awoken to how dangerous this bill is. [[User:EDITOR|EDITOR]] ([[User talk:EDITOR|talk]]) 07:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout in United States'''. As I stated above, "It's essential that Americans be made aware of what their lawmakers are doing, and for them to experience inconveniences and frustrations that are at least a shadow of the genuine losses that SOPA/PIPA will create. A banner won't do that; a click-through won't do that. Only a full blackout will. There are too few things that non-Americans can do to affect our political process to make it worthwhile to inconvenience them, however." [[User:JSarek|jSarek]] ([[User talk:JSarek|talk]]) 07:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:SteveStrummer|SteveStrummer]] ([[User talk:SteveStrummer|talk]]) 07:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support global'''. SOPA and PIPA would effect the whole world, so a global ''blackout'' would be appropriate. Obviously, information about SOPA and PIPA should still be available. [[User:Phlexonance|Phlexonance]] ([[User talk:Phlexonance]]) 07:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. GLOBAL BLACKOUT! It must be clear to all people both foreign and domestic that the U.S. will not censor the internet. That this is the U.S. not China [[User:Harryjamespotter1980|Harryjamespotter1980]] ([[User talk:Harryjamespotter1980|talk]]) 07:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Anything less will not catch the attention of senators and others supporting the SOPA. Having a little banner for discussion is definitely not enough, and even a soft blackout isn't enough. Having a full blackout is the only way to ensure that more of our liberties aren't taken away. [[User:Kolrok|'''Kolrok''']] | [[User talk:Kolrok|''Msgs'']] [[Special:Contributions/Kolrok|''©'']] 08:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout''' - SOPA also has influences on other countries - everyone should realize what the US is just about to do --[[User:Takayama812|Takayama812]] ([[User talk:Takayama812|talk]]) 08:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Support fully. [[User:Jmh649|'''Doc James''']] ([[User talk:Jmh649|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Jmh649|contribs]] · [[Special:EmailUser/Jmh649|email]]) 08:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' [[User:Fnurl|Fnurl]] ([[User talk:Fnurl|talk]]) 08:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Full, global blackout. We want the impact to be as wide as possible, and impossible to ignore. [[User:EhSeuss|EhSeuss]] ([[User talk:EhSeuss|talk]]) 08:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Given the US are already extraditing Englishmen for copyright infringement, I feel that their draconian and idiotic laws should be protested on these shores too. '''[[User:Bennydigital|Benny Digital]]''' [[User talk:Bennydigital|Speak Your Brains]] 08:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. Full and global with an Anti-SOPA/PIPA message. This is important. It's vital to show people what could happen. This is ridiculous we need to spread that. We complain about Chinese censorship--at least that doesn't affect the world. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ridyi|Ridyi]] ([[User talk:Ridyi|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ridyi|contribs]]) 08:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support'''. If we want to get the point across, it needs to be noticed. [[User:Notwist|notwist]] ([[User talk:Notwist|talk]]) 08:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Global, as stated, the effect needs to be real, not able to bypass. - [[User:L33tCh|L33tCh]] ([[User talk:L33tCh|talk]]) 09:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Eric119|Eric119]] ([[User talk:Eric119|talk]]) 09:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support Global Blackout'''. [[User:Thereen|Thereen]] ([[User talk:Thereen|talk]]) 09:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' total blackout for all US (at least). Won't it be great when the Congresspeople's aides can't get any research done! - [[User:KeithTyler|Keith D. Tyler]] [[User_talk:KeithTyler|¶]] 09:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. Threatening freedom on the internet affects the whole world. Therefore, the whole world must respond accordingly. Cheers from Italy.--[[User:Insilvis|Insilvis]] ([[User talk:Insilvis|talk]]) 09:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. —Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/76.169.75.235|76.169.75.235]] ([[User talk:76.169.75.235|talk]]) 09:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support US full blackout'''. US citizens must be made aware of this issue ''en masse'', and quickly. A full blackout hinders them from the luxury of clicking their way past the issue. [[User:Kpengboy|Kpengboy]] ([[User talk:Kpengboy|talk]]) 09:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Global support''' Originally I was going to go with the soft blackout, but really, this is obvious when you think about it. Show people what life would be like if SOPA was put into practice. Plus, this way, it won't just be clicked through. --[[User:Stealthysis|Stealthy]] ([[User talk:Stealthysis|talk]]) 09:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout worldwide'''. It's got to have impact for it to be worth anything. [[User:SiameseTurtle|SiameseTurtle]] ([[User talk:SiameseTurtle|talk]]) 09:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support US Blackout'''. It's very important that we do this. I fully support it. --[[User:redjuggler2012|redjuggler2012]] 4:01, 16 January 2012
#'''Support either US blackout and world banner or world blackout.''' [[User:Antrikshy|Antrikshy]] ([[User talk:Antrikshy|talk]]) 10:09, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I support a full global blackout, and any lesser actions should this one fail to pass. [[user:PatternSpider|PatternSpider]] ([[user talk:PatternSpider|talk]]) 10:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout''' [[User:Jackol| Jackol ]][[User talk:Jackol| ๏̯͡๏﴿]] 10:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' full global blackout, or, if that fails to pass, US blackout and world banner -- [[User:Smial|Smial]] ([[User talk:Smial|talk]]) 10:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' full global blackout --[[User:Retaggio|Retaggio]] ([[User talk:Retaggio|talk]]) 11:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' This is the best way for medias to talk about this issue. [[User:TedTed|TedTed]] ([[User talk:TedTed|talk]]) 11:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' from Norway. – ''[[User:Danmichaelo|Danmichaelo]] ([[User talk:Danmichaelo|talk]])'' 11:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' [[User:SongO|SongO]] ([[User talk:SongO|talk]]) 11:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. Since internet has no country borders, whatever action is taken should be global. [[User:Dimtsit|Dimtsit]] ([[User talk:Dimtsit|talk]]) 11:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' from New Zealand - high visibility, and not just an "American issue" [[User:Ingolfson|Ingolfson]] ([[User talk:Ingolfson|talk]]) 11:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. Let everyone know what governments can do to its people. Even if the bill doesn't pass, let it be warning for things to come. On a sidenote, I think it's great Wikipedianse come together for this cause (even if we don't agree on the way it should be handled). Just by glancing over the page I've come across more than ten Wikipedians I've noticed editing and talked through over the 5 years I've been here. Makes me proud to edit Wikipedia. --Soetermans. [[User talk: Soetermans|'''T''']] / [[Special:Contributions/Soetermans|'''C''']] 11:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly support global blackout''' from North Carolina. [[User:Prenn|'''PRENN''']] [[User talk:Prenn|''(talk)'']] 8:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC) — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/174.99.56.26|174.99.56.26]] ([[User talk:174.99.56.26|talk]])  
#'''Strongly support global blackout''' from Vietnam. [[User:Prenn|'''PRENN''']] [[User talk:Prenn|''(talk)'']] 11:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout for as long as possible''' because [[the road to hell is paved with good intentions]] and this proposed wild bill is an ugly, real, [[slippery slope]], that would leave only drivel content online and corporations running the web. In this case WP practices what it preaches that [[WP:NOTCENSORED]]. This bill is obviously being pushed by powerful lobbies that would make the Chinese commissars and the Iranian Ayatollahs ''very'' proud and, if enacted, will end with the web being censored for "good" i.e. selfish commercial and political reasons in America and Western democracies as it is [[Internet censorship in the People's Republic of China|censored in China]] for ideological "good reasons" and [[Internet censorship in Iran|censored in Iran]] for theological "good reasons" etc etc etc, see the madness of trying to "control" the Internet at [[:Category:Internet censorship]]. There's no end to the censorship madness. The putative censors should play more golf or jog and leave the web alone. The Internet must remain as free and as open as humanly possible. It is 100% true what the opponents of this so-called "[[Stop Online Piracy Act]]" say: '''1''' It violates the [[First Amendment to the United States Constitution|First Amendment]] (Tribe, Laurence H. (December 6, 2011). "THE “STOP ONLINE PIRACY ACT” (SOPA) VIOLATES THE FIRST AMENDMENT".) '''2''' It's [[Internet censorship]] (Chloe Albanesius (November 16, 2011). "SOPA: Is Congress Pushing Web Censorship?" PCMag.com.) '''3''' It will cripple the Internet (Chloe Albanesius (November 1, 2011). "Will Online Piracy Bill Combat 'Rogue' Web Sites or Cripple the Internet?".) '''4''' It will threaten [[Whistleblower|whistle-blowing]] and '''5''' [[Freedom of speech|free speech]] (Tribe, Laurence H. (December 6, 2011). "THE “STOP ONLINE PIRACY ACT” (SOPA) VIOLATES THE FIRST AMENDMENT"; Trevor Timm (November 2, 2011). "Proposed Copyright Bill Threatens Whistleblowing and Human Rights". [[Electronic Frontier Foundation]].) [[User:IZAK|IZAK]] ([[User talk:IZAK|talk]]) 12:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''.--[[User:BozMo|BozMo]] [[user talk:BozMo|talk]] 12:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. [[User:GGShinobi|GGShinobi]] ([[User talk:GGShinobi|talk]]) 12:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. [[User:Zaijaj|Zaijaj]] ([[User talk:Zaijaj|talk]]) 12:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. stop the hitlers of the modern day.--'''[[User:Milowent|Milowent]]''' • [[Special:Contributions/Milowent|has]][[User talk:Milowent|spoken]] 12:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full US blackout, world banner''' - it's politicians in the US that want this: a strong statement is needed, imo. [[User:Ale_jrb|Ale_Jrb]][[User_talk:Ale_jrb|talk]] 12:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''.[[User:Raboe001|Raboe001]] ([[User talk:Raboe001|talk]]) 12:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly support full global blackout''' [[User:HorseloverFat|HorseloverFat]] ([[User talk:HorseloverFat|talk]]) 12:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' Only way to make the point. [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|(talk)]] 12:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. People all around the world must realise how serious this problem is. [[User:Petru Dimitriu|Petru Dimitriu]] ([[User talk:Petru Dimitriu|talk]]) 12:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - Yup. [[user:Normandy|'''Norm''']][[user_talk:Normandy|'''andie''']] 13:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout.''' It concerns everyone [[User:GaterRaider|GaterRaider]] ([[User talk:GaterRaider|talk]]) 13:16, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly support full global blackout''' [[User:Jellevc|Jellevc]] ([[User talk:Jellevc|talk]]) 13:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#[[User:Annabel|Annabel]] ([[User talk:Annabel|talk]]) 13:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support.''' [[Special:Contributions/174.67.214.168|174.67.214.168]] ([[User talk:174.67.214.168|talk]]) 13:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' --[[User:Barbaking|Barbaking]] [[user talk:Barbaking|(talk)]] 13:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' Any disruption would still be small in comparison to the potential disruption if this passes. -- [[User:Makomk|makomk]] ([[User talk:Makomk|talk]]) 13:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. -- [[User:Karthikndr|Karthik]] [[User talk:Karthikndr|Nadar]] 13:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. NPOV is important for ''articles'', but the Wikipedia site itself can't be neutral about its own existence and freedom. [[User:Open4D|Open4D]] ([[User talk:Open4D|talk]]) 13:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - [[User:JMiall|JMiall]][[User talk:JMiall|₰]] 14:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. [[User:ZorbaTHut|ZorbaTHut]] ([[User talk:ZorbaTHut|talk]]) 14:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. —[[User:FireyFly|Fire]][[User talk:FireyFly|Fly]][[Special:Contributions/FireyFly|~]] 14:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. A full blackout would be much more effective. [[User:Qmwnebrvtcyxuz|Qmwnebrvtcyxuz]] ([[User talk:Qmwnebrvtcyxuz|talk]]) 14:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support.''' I strongly support a full global blackout since it will undoubtedly be a far stronger message with far greater implications. An informative page explaining what is happening and helping people contact their representatives / spread the word further should be put up instead. I also support leaving a small number of related articles (articles on SOPA, PROTECT-IP, copyright, intellectual property, etc) accessible. [[User:Dkasak|Denis Kasak]] ([[User talk:Dkasak|talk]]) 14:19, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. If it's just a splash screen, everyone will click through and be done with it. [[User:CP\M|CP/M]] [[User talk:CP\M|comm]] |[[WP:WNP|Wikipedia Neutrality Project]]| 14:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' [[User:Pgoergen|Pgoergen]] ([[User talk:Pgoergen|talk]]) 14:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' --[[User:Olei|Olei]] ([[User talk:Olei|talk]]) 14:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full blackout''' at least for US. [[User:Saiarcot895|Saiarcot895]] ([[User talk:Saiarcot895|talk]]) 14:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support.''' [[User:Tanzania|Tanzania]] ([[User talk:Tanzania|talk]]) 14:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full blackout for US. Either full or soft blackout for non-US is fine with me. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 14:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' either US or global. -- [[User:Cobi|Cobi]]([[User talk:Cobi|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cobi|c]]|[[User:ClueBot Commons/Bots|b]]) 14:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/70.254.34.219|70.254.34.219]] ([[User talk:70.254.34.219|talk]]) 14:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 
#'''STRONLGY Support'''. Once it passes in the US, there are many more chances that other countries follow the path. I don't want this to happen, for the sake of freedom of speech and information. [[User:Lewis82|Lewis82]] ([[User talk:Lewis82|talk]]) 14:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Zinnmann|Zinnmann]] ([[User talk:Zinnmann|talk]]) 14:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Modi mode|Modi mode]] ([[User talk:Modi mode|talk]]) 14:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. The only way to stop this is to raise awareness. [[User:Civgamer|Civgamer]] ([[User talk:Civgamer|talk]]) 14:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' [[User:Migdejong|Migdejong]] ([[User talk:Migdejong|talk]]) 14:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Total Blackout! [[User:613 The Evil|613 The Evil]] ([[User talk:613 The Evil|talk]]) 15:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' full blackout for US. --[[User:Govtrust|Govtrust]] ([[User talk:Govtrust|talk]]) 15:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' In Italy a full blackout was effective in forcing the government to reconsider a law which would have allowed anyone to force their own POV in a Wikipedia page. A full blackout (for users geolocated in the US only) is better in my opinion. Treat users located in the US differently would give them a taste of what SOPA will entail. US users could use proxies to access wikipedia, thus developing useful skills for the day SOPA will be law. --[[User:Lou Crazy|Lou Crazy]] ([[User talk:Lou Crazy|talk]]) 15:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Full global blackout. [[User:Raystorm|Raystorm]] [[User talk:Raystorm|''(¿Sí?)'']] 15:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'''. [[User:Leastfixedpoint|Leastfixedpoint]] ([[User talk:Leastfixedpoint|talk]]) 15:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Full global blackout with link to explanation of issues with SOPA and PIPA (and any other similar international initiatives). [[User:Rakerman|Rakerman]] ([[User talk:Rakerman|talk]]) 15:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Full global blackout [[User:TiloWiki|TiloWiki]] ([[User talk:TiloWiki|talk]]) 15:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Full global blackout with link to explanation of SOPA and PIPA. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/209.65.161.240|209.65.161.240]] ([[User talk:209.65.161.240|talk]]) 16:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 
#'''Support'''. [[User:Manydeer|Manydeer]] ([[User talk:Manydeer|talk]]) 16:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC) Full global blackout & banner
#'''Strong support'''. Full global blackout. [[User:Archaios|Archaios]] ([[User talk:Archaios|talk]]) 16:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Support'''. [[User:Sfaugue1|Sfaugue1]] ([[User talk:Sfaugue1|talk]]) 16:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC) This blackout should include a easy to read but detailed explanation of both SOPA and PIPA. Also, it should include a way for users to reach their Senators (in the United States).
#'''Support full global blackout'''. [[User:Jacek FH|Jacek FH]] ([[User talk:Jacek FH|talk]]) 16:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[Special:Contributions/70.131.63.143|70.131.63.143]] ([[User talk:70.131.63.143|talk]]) 15:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' --[[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan (talk)]] 16:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout'' — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/190.219.143.99|190.219.143.99]] ([[User talk:190.219.143.99|talk]]) 16:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 
#'''Support full global blackout''' --[[User:Azoreg|Azoreg]] ([[User talk:Azoreg|talk]]) 16:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' SOPA could prevent those of us outside the USA from accessing information and resources, including Wikipedia. As such, the protest is best-made as a global blackout. [[User:SmokingNewton|SmokingNewton]] [[User talk:SmokingNewton|(MESSAGE ME)]] 17:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support full global blackout''' --[[User:Wolbo|Wolbo]] ([[User talk:Wolbo|talk]]) 17:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Oppose =====
#'''Oppose''', lots of internet users don't know what [[SOPA]] is, and even don't care!! A full blackout will harm the flow of knowledge, and also some people use [[Wikipedia]] as a source for info. Some people might not care about the editing, but blocking the ability to read is a bit harsh and might even drive some people away from the cause & Wikipedia. --[[User:AbderrahmanNajjar|Abderrahman]] ([[User talk:AbderrahmanNajjar|talk]]) 15:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#:That's the point, lots of internet users don't know what SOPA is, but they should. Something like this would surely raise awareness about it. [[User:Theon144|Theon144]] ([[User talk:Theon144|talk]]) 16:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#:Theon144 is right. Additionally, Wikipedia is terrible as a source for information. Blacking it out for a day can only ''improve'' the flow of knowledge by inducing them to seek out actual sources for it, rather than one that any random vandal can get at. [[User:Rogue 9|Rogue 9]] ([[User talk:Rogue 9|talk]]) 19:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#::Eh, I strongly disagree with that sentiment, but let's not get into that here. [[User:Theon144|Theon144]] ([[User talk:Theon144|talk]]) 20:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#: Rogue, I hope you are not one of the vandals! — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Manydeer|Manydeer]] ([[User talk:Manydeer|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Manydeer|contribs]]) 16:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC) 
#'''Oppose''' full blackout. This will only affect Wikipedia readers and editors, and inconvenience them. Do you really think that Congress even reads Wikipedia?? If they did, they wouldn't be writing up these ridiculous bills. --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 04:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#:The goal isn't to get Senators to see it, but to raise awareness of SOPA among the general population so they can urge senators.--[[User:Sje46|Sje46]] ([[User talk:Sje46|talk]]) 05:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#::Congress people and their staffs do use wikipedia --[[User:Guerillero|Guerillero]] | [[User_talk:Guerillero|My Talk]] 06:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#::*What includes editing (with POV pushing and vandalism) - see [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment/United States Congress]] [[User:Bulwersator|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator|talk]]) 06:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#:::: Wow, thank you for that information. I had often wondered what was going on. [[User:Badon|Badon]] ([[User talk:Badon|talk]]) 07:02, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#:::::Yes, thanks for the link to the POV problems with US staffers, etc. I didn't realize the situation. However, I was being somewhat facetious in my comment above. I still do not think a full blackout is wise, because as stated by others below, then the important information about the situation will not be out there, and easily found. --[[User:Funandtrvl|Funandtrvl]] ([[User talk:Funandtrvl|talk]]) 17:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' Have to say I would oppose a full blackout. We want to ''protest'' censorship ''with'' censorship? I understand the sentiment that it could show what might be in store (direct action can be effective), but purposefully depriving people of information would make us no better than them. If there is any blackout type event, I would favor partial over full and prefer just good, eye-catching banners. -- [[User:JoannaSerah|JoannaSerah]] ([[User talk:JoannaSerah|talk]]) 05:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Oppose''' full blackout. This would prevent readers from reading articles about SOPA, DNSSEC, DMCA, etc. our protest will be more effective if we get their attention, then suggest articles to read on the topic. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] [[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]] 07:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Additional Comment'''. Perhaps it is appropriate then to do a full blackout, besides giving access to one or two pages explaining the purposes for the blackout. No one would come up with that conclusion on their own. I strongly support the full blackout. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Msheets1|Msheets1]] ([[User talk:Msheets1|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Msheets1|contribs]]) 07:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC) {{spa|Msheets1}}
# It's completely inappropriate for one group of editors to tell all the other editors that they can or can't edit on a given day. Where I come from that's called [[WP:POINT|disrupting Wikipedia to make a point]]. [[User:Lagrange613|Lagrange]][[User talk:Lagrange613#top|613]] 07:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Oppose''': This defeats the purpose of making information freely to all, and we do not know who will need it that very day. The partial blackout is more than enough to make our point. [[User:Kansan|Kansan]] ([[User talk:Kansan|talk]]) 08:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#: "''we do not know who will need it that very day''" - My suggestion is to make the user unable to access anything on the site unless their referrer is the SOPA article. If the user starts from the SOPA article, then they should be able to [[Wikipedia:Getting to Philosophy | get to philosophy]]. Or, the homepage, search, etc. As long as they have to view the SOPA article page first, I think that is a poignant enough blackout. With that said, I still '''support''' complete, utter blackout for as long as it takes to defeat SOPA. [[User:Badon|Badon]] ([[User talk:Badon|talk]]) 08:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#::There's enough Wikipedia mirrors available through Google so that if anyone really wants the info, they can get it. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 08:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#: As I wrote above, there are these places called '''public libraries'''; I'm informed they even exist beyond the borders of the US. If someone needs information on that day, they'll be open for business & very eager to help answer questions & assist in research -- as well as every day. This is not a good argument against a blackout. -- [[User:Llywrch|llywrch]] ([[User talk:Llywrch|talk]]) 06:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' Violates our core mission; due to mirror sites will not be an annoyance to the reader, but will encourage him to click elsewhere in future. Additionally, SOPA seems unlikely to escape the House unscathed.--[[User:Wehwalt|Wehwalt]] ([[User talk:Wehwalt|talk]]) 13:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#:<s>'''Oppose'''. I think a click-through information campaign will galvanize enough people to oppose the proposed legislation. I prefer to reserve disruptive protest for cases of actual, rather than proposed, injustice. ~ [[User:Ningauble|Ningauble]] ([[User talk:Ningauble|talk]]) 14:02, 14 January 2012 (UTC)</s>
#:I am advised by a 'bot, acting on behalf of a consensus of administrators, that my responses to this RfC are inapplicable or unclear. Whereas my response to the above captioned proposition represents my best effort to communicate my position on that specific proposition, and whereas it has been deemed unacceptable, I am therefore striking it and withdrawing from this RfC. ~ [[User:Ningauble|Ningauble]] ([[User talk:Ningauble|talk]]) 23:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' I'm very strongly opposed it it affects non US users, but although I've indicated I would let US users decide, I feel this is a bad enough idea I'm mildly opposed even if it affects US users only [[User:Nil Einne|Nil Einne]] ([[User talk:Nil Einne|talk]]) 14:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Keeping in mind that a decision must be made by the sixteenth, we are talking about a complete shutdown of Wikipedia based on two days of gathering consensus. Not a good idea. [[User:ReverendWayne|ReverendWayne]] ([[User talk:ReverendWayne|talk]]) 15:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose.''' If you're going gonna do a blackout, don't do this. Totally contradicts the mission of Wikipedia. --[[User:Jtalledo|Jtalledo]] [[User talk:Jtalledo|(talk)]] 15:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' this is an encyclopedia; cutting off access to information would be ridiculous. [[User:Rklawton|Rklawton]] ([[User talk:Rklawton|talk]]) 16:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose.''' Not likely to raise awareness much more than a click-through blackout screen, but much more inconvenient. --[[User:Zinger0|Zinger0]] ([[User talk:Zinger0|talk]]) 16:18, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' — [[User:Ched Davis|Ched]] : [[User_talk:Ched Davis| ? ]] 16:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose full blackout''' - click through screen should be just as effective. --[[User:Torchflame|Torchflame]] ([[User talk:Torchflame|talk]]) 16:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - A full blackout intentionally hurts people without drawing significantly more attention to what can already be achieved with a soft blackout. A possible compromize could be raising the bar for accessing the acutal Wikipedia again, such as a tick box or a confirmation that the user has already called his congressperson before proceeding. As we all know, everybody reads the full EULA when installing software :) -- [[User:Mathias Schindler|Mathias Schindler]] ([[User talk:Mathias Schindler|talk]]) 16:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''; we need to save the full blackout option for later if it's decided to do this again. [[User:Daniel Case|Daniel Case]] ([[User talk:Daniel Case|talk]]) 16:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - save it for if it passes. [[User:Selery|Selery]] ([[User talk:Selery|talk]]) 16:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - Do we really need people to be irritated at what they will perceive as Wikipedian political activism? Schools and universities aren't going to black themselves out on January 18th; neither should we. [[User:AUN4|AUN4]] ([[User talk:AUN4|talk]]) 17:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#:Professors do walk out and students stage sit-ins when an issue is severe enough to warrant it. This is such an issue.--[[User:Circumspice|Circumspice]] ([[User talk:Circumspice|talk]]) 01:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - Will cause significant disruption and won't raise awareness any more than a soft black out. Perhaps this should be kept in reserve in case SOPA makes significant progress. [[User:CT Cooper|CT Cooper]] · [[User talk:CT Cooper|talk]] 17:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - SOPA gives the Attorney General the right to seek an injunction to block foreign websites which (i) host a substantial proportion of infringing material (ii) refuse to acknowledge and/or take appropriate measures once they have been informed of its existence on the site. It is not for copyright holders to gauge the strength of evidence. It is a matter for the court. A judge needs to see compelling evidence that a site is operating illegally before an injunction is granted. You cannot divorce these two elements and pretend SOPA gives people the power to block websites willy-nilly. There are thousands of rogue websites that purposely host infringing material. DMCA is useless against them. I support people in the creative industries who choose to receive fair payment for their work. They need protection. — [[User:ThePowerofX|ThePowerofX]] 17:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Oppose''' - Draconian action not commensurate with the minimal threat of SOPA as currently amended. [[User:Carrite|Carrite]] ([[User talk:Carrite|talk]]) 17:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - I was willing to support a soft blackout because it educates people about SOPA but doesn't cut off access to Wikipedia. I had some qualms about Wikipedia becoming political, but a soft blackout seemed like a good compromise. Denying people access to information goes against the central purpose of Wikipedia. – [[User:GorillaWarfare|GorillaWarfare]] [[User talk:GorillaWarfare|(talk)]] 17:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - save for passage of the bill. for now, a soft blackout will be enough, i think.[[User:Mercurywoodrose|Mercurywoodrose]] ([[User talk:Mercurywoodrose|talk]]) 17:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Very Strong Oppose''' - It would undermine what Wikipedia is all about. Let's not initiate this, as we don't need to go to such a urgent matter right now. --[[User:Radiokid1010|Radiokid1010]] ([[User talk:Radiokid1010|talk]]) 17:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Oppose''' - I think a click through combined with some visible changes to the pages ( border etc. ) once clicked through should be enough. [[User:PaleAqua|PaleAqua]] ([[User talk:PaleAqua|talk]]) 18:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Oppose''' - What kind of example does this set exactly? Editors are not supposed to disrupt Wikipedia to prove a point, not use Wikipedia as a soapbox, and not present just one side of the issue. I am pretty sure this is suggesting we do all of those things on a site-wide scale.--[[User:The Devil's Advocate|The Devil's Advocate]] ([[User talk:The Devil's Advocate|talk]]) 18:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - Someone might really need the info we provide that day. (Especially info on SOPA itself). And SOPA has been revised to be less odious than it was. Reserve the full blackout option for more dire circumstances. [[User:Sonicsuns|Sonicsuns]] ([[User talk:Sonicsuns|talk]]) 18:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' any blackout - let us keep a [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] in all things. [[User:Arbitrarily0|<big>A</big>rbitrarily<big>0</big>]] ([[User talk:Arbitrarily0|talk]]) 18:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# (edit conflict x3) '''Strong Oppose''' – While we may be temporarily using Wikipedia as a soapbox, and I think in this situation it is warranted, there is no need to disrupt our service. If necessary, it could be read-only, but I'd be concerned about BLP concerns and vandalism remaining in effect, getting in right before "close of business". — <tt>[[User talk:Madman|madman]]</tt> 18:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Strong oppose''' as per [[User:Arbitrarily0]]. Teun Spaans ([[User_talk:TeunSpaans|talk]]) 18:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Oppose''' - While a full blackout of Wikipedia would be the most powerful tool in our arsenal (you can't click through a full blackout), it's not what we should be using here. Wikipedia is an important source of information for millions, and a full blackout would deny them access to both general knowledge and knowledge on SOPA/PIPA as well, while going against the idea of free information. The time that it would be right to use a full blackout is when SOPA/PIPA poses an immediate danger to Wikipedia (i.e. going for a vote to pass the bill), and we aren't at that point yet. – [[User:Andrew Hampe|Andrew Hampe]] [[User talk:Andrew Hampe|Talk]] 19:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
## Let's have only the pages about SOPA, PIPA and OPEN accessible. We need to attract people's attention to get government attention. [[User:SiPlus|SiPlus]] ([[User talk:SiPlus|talk]]) 19:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Oppose''' This kind of a harsh action is an extremely bad idea as it hurts Wikipedia probably more than SOPA would. It's like a man hearing that he ''may'' have a serious disease and because of that, commits suicide.[[User:ML|ML]] ([[User talk:ML|talk]]) 19:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
## This idea hurts temporarily, SOPA hurts permanently. It's more like a sleep than a suicide. [[User:SiPlus|SiPlus]] ([[User talk:SiPlus|talk]]) 19:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
##: I agree. We need to be ruthless in stomping this out of existence so no politician will ever again risk humiliating himself by suggesting another law like it. '''Support'''. [[User:Badon|Badon]] ([[User talk:Badon|talk]]) 20:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Oppose''' a full blackout. Our mission is to inform; besides, we should not risk coming off as petulant. [[User:QuartierLatin1968|Q·L·]]''[[User talk:QuartierLatin1968|1968]]'' [[Special:Contributions/QuartierLatin1968|☿]] 19:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. I think a full blackout is premature. Wikipedia is too valuable a resource to be shut off on a whim. If it comes to a vote in the full House and Senate, then we should consider more drastic measures. [[User:Kaldari|Kaldari]] ([[User talk:Kaldari|talk]]) 20:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#:I '''100% Agree''' with that statement. We shouldn't go to such measures like this anytime soon. --[[User:Radiokid1010|Radiokid1010]] ([[User talk:Radiokid1010|talk]]) 20:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', '''with passion'''. The Wikipedia is a critical, world-wide public service. Perhaps the first of such magnitude. A full blackout would leave me rather disgruntled. [[User:Neil Smithline|Neil Smithline]] ([[User talk:Neil Smithline|talk]]) 20:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. This goes too far for a free encyclopedia and a first protest. Wait until a bill passes. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 20:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#: An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. How much influence do you think we will still have when someone besides us shuts down Wikipedia? The time to use the big guns is before you're desperate, not after. [[User:Badon|Badon]] ([[User talk:Badon|talk]]) 20:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#::Well, I would agree that we shouldn't wait until someone else shuts us down, but the stage at which Congress sends a bill to the White House is before that would happen. We're still the free encyclopedia, and shouting isn't always the best way to win an argument. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 22:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#::: If you wait until the noose is around your neck, arguing would only make it tighter. The time to win this is NOW, not later when we're begging for the mercy of murderers and thieves in government. [[User:Badon|Badon]] ([[User talk:Badon|talk]]) 03:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. This is not a desperate enough situation to warrant a full blackout. We should not risk angering people who rely Wikipedia as a service. At some point, this goes too far as a protest. hello, i'm a [[User:Member|member]] | [[User talk:Member|talk to me!]] 20:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly oppose'''. Two wrongs do not make a right. Cutting off access to Wikipedia is called having a tantrum, in my opinion. [[User:Peter Chastain|Peter Chastain]] ([[User talk:Peter Chastain|talk]]) 20:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' a full blackout right now. It hasn't come to that. [[User:Shadowjams|Shadowjams]] ([[User talk:Shadowjams|talk]]) 22:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongest possible oppose'''. [[WP:SOAPBOX|Wikipedia is not a soapbox]] and [[WP:POINT|is not to be disrupted to make a point]]. These apply to the WMF just as much as its editors. - [[User:The Bushranger|The Bushranger]] [[User talk:The Bushranger|One ping only]] 22:44, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. SOPA has not passed yet. If it does, it will merit drastic measures, aka a full blackout. [[User:Pinkmango00|-SharonT]] ([[User talk:Pinkmango00|talk]]) 22:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#:The time to protest is ''before'' SOPA is passed - afterwards is too late. -- [[User:Arwel Parry|Arwel Parry]] [[User_talk:Arwel Parry|(talk)]] 23:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Gw2010-11
#'''Very Strong Oppose''' WP Should not be used for political activism, if it does it should lose it's non-profit status. [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel|talk]]) 23:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. A full blackout will hinder wikipedia users more than anything. [[User:Ajihood|Ajihood]] ([[User talk:Ajihood|talk]]) 23:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. A full blackout is too drastic and will cause Wikipedia to lose users, as its more an annoyance to users than a propellant for them to become activists. I think this should be avoided this unless SOPA passes [[Special:Contributions/173.188.59.151|173.188.59.151]] ([[User talk:173.188.59.151|talk]]) 02:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Oppose''' - Do not think we need to go this far to address issue, a banner is fine. '''[[User:Dough4872|Dough]][[User talk:Dough4872|48]][[Special:Contributions/Dough4872|72]]''' 02:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Oppose''' - Wikipedia has not and should not participate in the game of politics. '''[[WP:NOTADVOCATE]]''' and '''[[WP:DISRUPTPOINT]]'''. While I do feel SOPA is an absolutely horrible idea that will be of little benefit, by getting involved we only hurt ourselves. There is little to gain through any participation across the Wikimedia projects. If anything, it will only hurt the users of Wikipedia while having little to no impact on the decision making in regards to SOPA. [[User:Slazenger|'''--Slazenger''']] ([[User talk:Slazenger|Contact Me]]) 03:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' Completely disabling the site is against the stated goal of the Wikimedia foundation - "encouraging the growth, development and distribution of free, multilingual content, and to providing the full content of these wiki-based projects to the public free of charge". Choosing to withhold the content of the project when there is not an imminent threat to Wikipedia itself (SOPA does not directly endanger Wikipedia) is entirely disproportionate. Even worse would be a US only shutdown of the site. This suffers the same problems as the completely disabling the site, while simultaneously discriminating against a large portion of the userbase. Obviously that would be contrary to the [[m:founding principles|founding principles]] ("the ability of almost anyone to edit (most) articles without registration"), as well as the [[m:non discrimination policy|non discrimination policy]] ("discrimination against current or prospective users and employees on the basis of... national origin,..."). Click through banners (the so called soft blackout) would not suffer this problem. [[User:Prodego|''Prodego'']] [[User talk:Prodego|talk]] 05:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# I '''oppose''' a full blackout. --[[User:Michael Snow|Michael Snow]] ([[User talk:Michael Snow|talk]]) 05:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' full blackout.
#'''Oppose''' per Prodego.--[[User:JayJasper|JayJasper]] ([[User talk:JayJasper|talk]]) 06:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong oppose'''—I feel that this conflicts directly with Wikipedia's mission. {{[[User:Nihiltres|Nihiltres]]|[[User talk:Nihiltres|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Nihiltres|edits]]|[[WP:03|⚡]]}} 06:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong oppose'''. It is not Wikipedia's place to be playing politics, and this is, by definition, a political issue. If the fundamental freedoms of Americans are being harmed by this legislation then it is a matter for the courts to revoke, just like any other issue. While the Wikimedia Foundation's mandate does include the promotion of open source (thus opposition to this bill might be within that mandate), that is ''clearly not'' the mandate of Wikipedia itself. Wikipedia should ''never'' be used as a tool for ''any'' political purpose, including as directed by the Wikimedia Foundation. -'''[[User:M.nelson|M.Nelson]]''' ([[User talk:M.nelson|talk]]) 07:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong oppose'''. This is effectively censorship in itself, and censoring more things is not a good reaction to the threat of other people censoring things. To deny people access to a valuable tool to make a point is not the right way to handle this. --[[User:Scgtrp|scgtrp]] ([[User_talk:Scgtrp|talk]]) 08:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong oppose'''. Save our bullets: ramp it up one step further next time if it's absolutely necessary. [[User:Tony1|'''Tony''']] [[User talk:Tony1|(talk)]] 08:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# I '''oppose''' a full blackout since it would be a loss of knowledge for an hour or a day or so. We never know who would be requiring immediate reference to Wikipedia for any given article may be, at any given moment, urgently. Refer Wikipedia foundation stated goals - " ... development and distribution of free .... providing the full content .... free of charge". A [[WP:NPOV|neutral point of view]] should be observed. We must know all the facts and hear all the alternatives and listen to all the criticisms. .... Patience is indeed a virtue. We should be calm and should not over-react & provide access to all the stuff to the best as we always did. Soft Blackout is more than enough, is more than preferable. [[User:Ninney|Ninney]] ([[User talk:Ninney|talk]]) 08:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#:So winning the battle of 99.999% uptime is fine even when it increases the chances of losing the war and going down permanently or becoming much less useful? I don't think so. Sometimes you have to take the time to do preventive maintenance in order to head off a serious problem. A blackout for a short period of time can be very healthy preventive maintenance in this situation. Many users want to be made aware of serious risks to resources they rely on before a failure occurs. They forgive a small loss if that is what might be necessary. It's also called paying an insurance premium. [[User:Hozelda|Hozelda]] ([[User talk:Hozelda|talk]]) 15:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong oppose'''. Please see the [[meta:Fundraising 2011/Brandon Letter/en|quote of Brandon Haris]], which we used for fundraising. '''The site is not and should never be a propaganda tool'''. These kind of actions will ruin Wikipedia. --[[User:Vssun|Vssun]] ([[User talk:Vssun|talk]]) 12:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong oppose''' - besides the fact that Wikipedia should not be engaged in political advocacy, I suspect a full global blackout, however brief, will cause more damage to the encyclopaedia than SOPA ever concievably could. [[User:Robofish|Robofish]] ([[User talk:Robofish|talk]]) 13:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#* The point of the blackout is not just to draw attention, it's to ''simulate'' a possible outcome of SOPA when it passes. Rather a temporary blackout now to avert the act, then a permanent one that might pass if we don't raise attention under Wikipedians. [[User:Jurjenb|Jurjenb]] ([[User talk:Jurjenb|talk]]) 13:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose any blackout'''. I will reiterate what I said above: Any action of this sort from Wikipedia's side will undermine the public's perception of Wikipedia as a politically neutral website. [[User:Sjakkalle|Sjakkalle]] [[User talk:Sjakkalle|(Check!)]] 14:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly oppose''' - why inconvenience thousands of editors and millions of users for a political gesture that I sincerely doubt Congress will even notice? I'm against SOPA, but Wikipedia is a reference work, not a soapbox. [[User:Michaelmas1957|Michaelmas1957]] ([[User talk:Michaelmas1957|talk]]) 15:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''VERY STRONG OPPOSE''' As a user above says, it's ridiculous to oppose censorship with censorship. --{{User-multi
|User=Imagine Wizard
|1=t
|2=c
|3=ct
|sup=
|doc=yes
}} [[Pig Latin|Iway amway Imagineway Izardway.]] 15:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Oppose Full Blackout'''. A full blackout (global or US only) isn't the best decision. Also the period of full blackout isn't clear. We should remember that it is the people around the world who contribute to Wikipedia the most. There are so many edits/contributions made, so much information shared everyday. A full blackout would certainly hamper that. It would certainly block access to people who contribute to it the most and/or are benefited the most from its (Wikipedia) existence. The banners/blackouts suggested above will achieve the same results as the full blackout but without hampering the progress and processes of Wikipedia. Personally, I support (1) Blackout US only, global banner. [[User:Trunks ishida|trunks_ishida]] ([[User talk:Trunks ishida|talk]]) 15:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' per {{u|Kaldari}}. '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]''' [[User talk:Salvio giuliano| Let's talk about it!]] 16:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. [[User:Jamface1|Jamface1]] ([[User talk:Jamface1|talk]]) 17:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#Real mature guys. [[User:Juliancolton|Juliancolton]] ([[User talk:Juliancolton|talk]]) 17:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong oppose''' any blackout whatsoever. I've expanded upon my opinion above, but a blackout would punish users for something which a) wasn't done by them and b) hasn't even been passed yet. This would also bring Wikipedia into local politics, rather than remaining neutral [[User:Modest Genius|Modest Genius]] [[User_talk:Modest Genius|talk]] 17:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - All blackout measures. By all means use Wikipedia as a platform to protest against blacklist legislation, but do so in a way that does not impede users abilities to use the site. - [[User:Hahnchen|hahnch]][[User:Hahnchen/E|e]][[User:Hahnchen|n]] 17:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#Absolute nonsense. Would completely undermine our steps taken to get more new users to this website, and is all in all a very stupid idea. — [[User talk:Fox|Joseph '''Fox''']] 18:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''- Wikipedia is a charitable organization. It should do the job it does best (of giving information), not engaging in this type of activity.
# '''Oppose''': If a full block is needed, real change needs to be made with WMF moving its incorporation overseas and moving its servers overseas. Any international action is unfairly punishing the global community and sends a message that international contributors have less value than Americans. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 20:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Oppose''': the Comunity of the en:WP can't and don't have to decide about a global Blackout! [[User:Marcus Cyron|Marcus Cyron]] ([[User talk:Marcus Cyron|talk]]) 20:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#:It's all about blacking out the ''English Wikipedia'' for a global scale, as opposed to blocking it in the United States ''only'' using geolocalisation. [[user:odder|odder]] ([[user talk:odder|talk]]) 11:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' I am saddened and aggrieved that some people want to use Wikipedia as a political tool. If people have objections to legislations they should make their protests known by acting as individuals, not by utilising the work that I and thousands of others have done. I am not contributing to Wikipedia to provide anyone with a means to add weight to their opposition to legislation. If you're not happy, write to Congress - you can use [http://www.opencongress.org/bill/112-h3261/show OpenCongress], or some other means. A handful of vocal editors should not be able to force the closure of a website used by millions. Most users of the site, editors and readers, would not even be aware this discusion is taking place. '''[[User:SilkTork|SilkTork]]''' '''[[User talk:SilkTork|✔Tea time]]''' 22:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#:450 users is hardly a handful. The fact is that, as much as we may try to be neutral in our articles, the very nature of Wikipedia is a political statement. The mission of the Wikimedia Foundation "is to empower and engage people around the world to collect and develop educational content under a free license or in the public domain, and to disseminate it effectively and globally." It can't do this if it sits idly by while the very things which made this mission feasible, the Internet, is made hostile to that goal. [[User:Mahewa|&Dagger; MAHEWA &Dagger;]] • [[User talk:Mahewa|talk]] 23:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#:: This is also the tyranny of the majority and simply mob rule as well, one of the reasons why a basic reasons why Wikipedia uses [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] rather than simply majority votes on almost all content decisions. Having 450/500/1000 people supporting a position doesn't necessarily make it right, and there are some profound and IMHO irreconcilable issues being raised by the opposition where far more harm will be done to Wikipedia if this blackout happens than if some hot headed and rash youngsters decide to go along with this blackout. I personally think the opposition here is providing some very strong justification for why this blackout should never happen, where the logical thing, as well as the most "reversible" action is to simply not act. Acting here and doing the blackout is irreversible so far as it makes Wikipedia a political tool in other areas as well, and significantly impacts the neutrality of the project in the future in profound and irreparable ways. Once it is done, it can't be undone. That is not the wiki way, and anything which is permanent is something that should be generally avoided. That there is not just one voice of opposition should speak volumes in itself. --[[User:Robert Horning|Robert Horning]] ([[User talk:Robert Horning|talk]]) 02:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#:::Although I am sympathetic to most of the reasons for opposing a full blackout, I think you and many other opposers are overstating the negative consequences of a full blackout. I believe taking a somewhat extreme hard-line as early as possible for only a maximum of 24 hours, or less, will be maximally effective while at the same time minimizing the amount of disruption it causes. I think the normal fund-raising done every year with banners everywhere is cumulatively more disruptive than an isolated, planned blackout for only 1 day. [[User:Badon|Badon]] ([[User talk:Badon|talk]]) 03:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''': a full blackout will cause some apolitical users to believe that Wikipedia is unreliable, and is contrary to our mission to provide free information to everyone on a nondiscriminatory basis. [[User:Warren Dew|Warren Dew]] ([[User talk:Warren Dew|talk]]) 23:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#:Users should feel that we are unreliable. Our servers are in the US and the US is about to pass laws that would make what we do here impossible, at least within the US and its sphere of influence. If the United States goes down this path, it places our existing infrastructure in jeopardy. Don't think of it as a 'political' step, though-- think of it as an emergency alert system. Most people have never even heard of SOPA-- we may be the only people in a position to change that. --[[User:HectorMoffet|HectorMoffet]] ([[User talk:HectorMoffet|talk]]) 01:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' if we try to fight a potential attempt at blackout with a blackout, how are we better then? punishing users can never be a form of appealing to them [[User:Sayan rc|Sayan rc]] ([[User talk:Sayan rc|talk]]) 23:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' So because some domestic legislation is being discussed in the US, people want to pull the plug on people outside the US in order to gain their support. Yeh right.--[[User:Peter cohen|Peter cohen]] ([[User talk:Peter cohen|talk]]) 01:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - There are only so many ways I can explain myself here, but if you are going to "count votes", I might as well make my "vote" count too even if it is a "minority" opinion. There are numerous strong reasons to oppose this blackout, and I find that this is going to be a misguided exercise if it happens. It also seems like any effort for reason or even attempting to gain consensus on this issue is over, and that the principle of things like [[WP:VOTE]] or why voting in general is a bad thing on a project like this is being completely missed. Minority opinions are being trampled to death here by an unruly mob that doesn't seem to care about the very real consequences of their rash actions. --[[User:Robert Horning|Robert Horning]] ([[User talk:Robert Horning|talk]]) 02:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', an action of this nature involves Wikipedia, a project that strives to be both global and neutral, in local politics. The project has worked very hard to establish its reputation for neutrality and trustworthiness against academic hostility; taking any political action will have a direct undermining effect on that effort. [[User:TechnoSymbiosis|TechnoSymbiosis]] ([[User talk:TechnoSymbiosis|talk]]) 03:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - A complete blackout will not spread knowledge, only confusion. [[User:Shatteredshards|Shatteredshards]] ([[User talk:Shatteredshards|talk]]) 03:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' Wikipedia is a vital global resource. Though its future is threatened by the bill, I don't believe the gain of shutting out readers and editors is worth the increase in confusion and frustration which many would feel. A click-through blackout strikes the right balance between efficacy and disruption. [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]] [[User talk:Ocaasi|t ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Ocaasi| c]] 03:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' 04:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' This does more harm than good. [[User:NYyankees51|NYyankees51]] ([[User talk:NYyankees51|talk]]) 04:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Oppose''' This will definitely harm Wikipedia's reputation. I support a soft blackout, but in a way that forces the reader to at least glance at the message. But preventing Wikipedia users from accessing its content altogether completely undermines our mission. [[User:Haha169|haha169]] ([[User talk:Haha169|talk]]) 06:55, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' If we do this now, we'll have to do it ''again'' if the bill passes. Then we'll look like a bunch of schmucks. Let's save it for the bitter end. [[User:Braincricket|Braincricket]] ([[User talk:Braincricket|talk]]) 07:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''': Always stay neutral in politics, even if the proposed law affects Wikipedia.[[User:Nicob1984|Nico]] ([[User talk:Nicob1984|talk]]) 08:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' to emphasise Wikipedia's neutrality, and because confusion is a much more likely consequence than is awareness. [[User:Veracon.net|Veracon.net]] ([[User talk:Veracon.net|talk]]) 09:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - WP:NPOV. wikipedia should not take sides in local politics; as much as the US thinks it runs the world, last time i looked i don't have a 'congressman' or 'representative in the house' who i could contact. and this is a slippery slope - does wikipedia go down if say south africa brings in a new censorship law? further, SOPA would be great news for european hosts. the US a few years back enacted the same SOPA-style laws against online gambling; now a multi-billion euro business, providing for the US and european gambler, largely hosted in europe. if the US wishes to enact local laws to the detriment of its economy, that is not the problem of a (supposedly) global website like wikipedia [[User:Jw2036|Jw2036]] ([[User talk:Jw2036|talk]]) 12:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' This bill will not pass Congress, despite the fears of uneducated Internet users, and even if it would it would not impact Wikipedia. [[User:Shii|Shii]] [[user_talk:Shii|(tock)]] 12:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. NO full blackout pls! [[User:ShotmanMaslo|ShotmanMaslo]] ([[User talk:ShotmanMaslo|talk]]) 13:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Diferently from organizations that started the initiative in the first place, Wikipedia users may officially have a non uniform set of oppinions. There are at least people who don't care, and people who agree with the bill. --[[User:Hdante|hdante]] ([[User talk:Hdante|talk]]) 15:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. NPOV should apply to decisions like these as well. [[User:Zellin|zellin]] [[User talk:Zellin|t]] / [[Special:Contributions/Zellin|c]] 16:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. let's start soft. --[[User:CatMan61|CatMan61]] ([[User talk:CatMan61|talk]]) 16:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' NPOV blackout. [[User:Sebleouf|Sebleouf]] ([[User talk:Sebleouf|talk]]) 17:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Per Seblouf. [[User:Suprememangaka|Suprememangaka]] ([[User talk:Suprememangaka|talk]]) 17:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Comments =====
Whether congress reads Wikipedia or not, voters certainly do. ---[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 04:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
: Exactly. Same goes for the "US only" blackout. Non-U.S. users have friends who are U.S. voters, whom they can influence. -- [[User:Dandv|Dandv]]([[User talk:Dandv|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Dandv|contribs]]) 05:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

There are some practical issues that come to mind here— how am I to learn about SOPA if Wikipedia is down? The Wikipedia articles are some of the best starting points currently available, better than most of the anti-sopa sites. Likewise, to write a compelling letter I'm going to need to do some research, — again— Wikipedia. I'm very concerned that a "splash page" style 'blackout' is insufficient because people are so well trained by internet advertising, — but a full blackout might be counter-productive. A really hard to dismiss splash (I'd suggest making the user solve a captcha, except for accessibility issues) might be a reasonable compromise (esp in the case of this option ending up with strong mixed support/opposition). --[[User:Gmaxwell|Gmaxwell]] ([[User talk:Gmaxwell|talk]]) 06:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
: Make the user leave feedback for their Congress critter to dismiss the blackout screen. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] [[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]] 07:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
: "''how am I to learn about SOPA if Wikipedia is down''" - I think this is a valid concern. My suggestion is to make the user unable to access anything on the site unless their referrer is the SOPA article. If the user starts from the SOPA article, then they should be able to [[Wikipedia:Getting to Philosophy | get to philosophy]]. [[User:Badon|Badon]] ([[User talk:Badon|talk]]) 07:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
::I think the very statement "''how am I to learn about SOPA if Wikipedia is down''" tells us something about the degree to which Wikipedia has become pervasive in our society. Everybody I know who wants to quickly check a factoid goes to Wikipedia. Many academics I know use Wikipedia as a starting point for preparing lectures or seminars, or even for getting background knowledge when they seriously start working on a new topic themselves. Anyways, I think the idea of allowing access via [[SOPA]] is charming on first sight, but will rightfully alienate users. We are not their mommies who tell them to first do their homework, however sloppy, before they can go [[Special: Random|play]]. It will also be perceived as ineffective - it's equivalent to making people tick a box on a 20 page service agreement before allowing access. [[HumancentiPad]] aside, few of us read those, much less in detail. A simple splash screen will have the same effect without the inconvenience. A real black-out would demonstrate how critical Wikipedia has become and how serious we are about this. Either is preferable to the the "click through SOPA" option, in my opinion. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 10:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
::: I agree with you. I '''support''' full blackout, over any other option, for the same reasons you mentioned. [[User:Badon|Badon]] ([[User talk:Badon|talk]]) 18:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
:::: When transport workers strike, it's still possible to travel by other means (foot, bicycle, for town travel, or train instead of aeroplane, etc.), when bakers strike, you can still bake your own bread. [[WP:OR|No information in Wikipedia is original research]], so you can still get the information from the original research sources or from third-party sources with reputations for fact-checking and known biases. And there are still going to be fresh google cache copies of probably almost every Wikipedia page. There are also many mirror sites that more or less reproduce Wikipedia content. [[Duckduckgo]] and other search engines will still get you to information about SOPA during the blackout. But you won't be able to edit it. [[User:Boud|Boud]] ([[User talk:Boud|talk]]) 15:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
::"how am I to learn about SOPA if Wikipedia is down": it's probably extreme difficult technically to allow access to ''just the SOPA-page'', but that would make people even more conscious how much they occupy a free information source to understand their reality. --[[User:GENtLe|GENtLe]] ([[User talk:GENtLe|talk]])
:::It isn't difficult at all. Just move the page onto meta and link it. --[[User:Matthiasb|Matthiasb]] ([[User talk:Matthiasb|talk]]) 10:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

: '''I would like to make two points'''. First, recognizing that Wikipedia searching is a reactionary impulse executed immediately and swiftly by a very large number of people when they encounter something they do not know or understand. As mentioned above, if Wikipedia is completely blacked out, accurate and unbiased understanding of SOPA may be difficult to find, which could easily result in either dismissal of concern, or, perhaps worse, propagation of more accessible but biased or inaccurate information. Second; food for thought: I feel that the debate over whether or not Wikipedia ought to take action on this topic is fundamentally a discussion over whether Wikipedia is primarily an encyclopeida for people, or a people's encyclopedia. Happy voting. [[User:ZiltoidTheOmnicient|Commander Ziltiod]] [[User talk:ZiltoidTheOmnicient|Speak!]] 07:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

If the blackout does occur, what about sending a message banner out it's users and tell them to help stop the SOPA and PIPA bills from passing when they try to use Wikipedia? [[User:BattleshipMan|BattleshipMan]] ([[User talk:BattleshipMan|talk]]) 07:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

:'''Salutations, everybody!''' I am in favor of a global blackout of Wikipedia except for articles about the »'''''Stop Online Piracy'''''« and »'''''PROTECT IP'''''« Acts detailing the damage that both laws will cause if passed along with a dossier of all the US legislators responsible for the creation of those two bills. The message explaining this is that this is the most that Wikipedia will be unless the »'''''Stop Online Piracy'''''« and »'''''PROTECT IP'''''« Acts are extinguished absolutely, immediately, and forever. The United States seriously needs to stop manufacturing criminals from its citizens.
[[User:Dairi no Kenkyo|Dairi no Kenkyo]] ([[User talk:Dairi no Kenkyo|talk]]) 13:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
<del>#'''Support global blackout''' as first choice, global click-through if not. Although it will be extremely devastating and inconvenient for people around the world, everyone needs to be aware of this, otherwise they will just click the "Continue" link and not bother about it; plus, it gives people a taste of what it's like not to have free information available to them with a few clicks. [[User:Ajmint|''' ajmint ''']] ([[User talk:Ajmint|talk]] •[[Special:Contributions/ajmint|edits]]) 19:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)</del>
:Please vote in the appropriate section, not in the comment section. Thanks! --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 05:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

:Everyone, if we're going to do a full blackout, '''Can We PLEASE Make It Fair and NEUTRAL for everyone??''' It seems like we may be taking things just a little over the top by actually shutting down the entire website for a whole day to protest over politics. Now, I don't want to get into rules, but I feel like the guidelines are clearly being violated here, and no one is getting an equal and fair share in these protests. I mean, we have to make a fair compromise so that everyone, not just some people, but everyone, is happy. Plus, it doesn't seem like everyone is being informed of the lastest news that the SOPA and PIPA hearings which were originally scheduled over the next two weeks have been pushed back (I may be wrong). The point I'm trying to make is let's not go out of hand with this. There are lots of other ways of getting our voices heard, and I just feel that a full blackout isn't the best idea for '''every single person''' in here, not just the people who support it, but those who both support and oppose. '''PLEASE''', let's make things fair and neutral for everyone here. Thank you. --[[User:Radiokid1010|Radiokid1010]] ([[User talk:Radiokid1010|talk]]) 20:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

====Soft blackout====
(click-through option cont'd from [[Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Action/BlackoutSection]])

A significant portion of the community advised blacking-out the site using a click-through process, which would present the following work-flow: when a user attempts to access the English Wikipedia for the first time on the designated date(s), they are presented with a notice describing the SOPA threat and suggesting that they take action (see below, section “What action should users take?”). They then have the option to “click-through” the screen. Once they’ve clicked through, everything is normal: no content is removed or obscured, and normal editing applies. In addition, all users of the English Wikipedia would see banners at the top of each page with informational text that will include a call to action: links to locate contact information for local congressional delegations (if the user is in the United States) or U.S. embassies (if the user is outside the United States). The banners should be dismissable, as with the fundraising banners. Geo-located banners will continue to run for two weeks after the blackout period. The Wikimedia Foundation would develop technology necessary to implement this.

===== Support =====
#'''Support Globally'''. [[User: Awhiteaker|Awhiteaker]] ([[User talk:Awhiteaker|talk]]) 23:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|173.76.128.52}}
#'''Support'''. [[User:Nithinmanne|Nithinmanne]] ([[User talk:Nithinmanne|talk]]) 04:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Nithinmanne}}
#'''Support''' [[User:Willsmith|WillSmith]] ([[User talk:Willsmith|talk]]) 01:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', I support a soft blackout globally. --[[User:AbderrahmanNajjar|Abderrahman]] ([[User talk:AbderrahmanNajjar|talk]]) 15:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' – [[User:Andrew Hampe|Andrew Hampe]] [[User talk:Andrew Hampe|Talk]] 18:19, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# Save the full blackout for if it passes. [[User:Selery|Selery]] ([[User talk:Selery|talk]]) 17:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' If we do have a blackout, it should be a page explaining the impact of SOPA on Wikipedia. The banner can redirect to the blackout page, with comments explaining what SOPA is. --[[User:Dialh|Dial]] ([[User talk:Dialh|talk]]) 17:01, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - Better as a first resort and will raise awareness just as effectively without completing cutting off access to the encyclopedia. [[User:CT Cooper|CT Cooper]] · [[User talk:CT Cooper|talk]] 17:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - A full blackout denies people the access to information, something that goes against Wikipedia's purpose. A soft blackout educates people about the bill without denying access, and is the best option. – [[User:GorillaWarfare|GorillaWarfare]] [[User talk:GorillaWarfare|(talk)]] 17:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''/Support''', but use full blackout if it passes (assuming passage w/o major alterations)[[User:Mercurywoodrose|Mercurywoodrose]] ([[User talk:Mercurywoodrose|talk]]) 17:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Weak Support''', last choice. Better than nothing but prefer full blackout. [[User:TotientDragooned|TotientDragooned]] ([[User talk:TotientDragooned|talk]]) 18:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' I think a soft blackout is enough. [[User:PaleAqua|PaleAqua]] ([[User talk:PaleAqua|talk]]) 18:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' — This is was what I was supporting above. Everyone should be aware of our initiative, but it should only directly affect the viewing experience of U.S. readers (and even then, the encyclopedia should be readable, if perhaps read-only). — <tt>[[User talk:Madman|madman]]</tt> 18:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - I'm not convinced this is as effective as a full blackout, but it also is less disruptive. And it's much better than nothing. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 18:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. I don't think the Foundation taking a political action on an issue with such direct relevance to its mission compromises the NPOV of Wikipedia's articles. I think the click-through is appropriate; I fear a full blackout might do too much harm to people who need information urgently. And I think selecting certain articles to make available would blur the line between a Foundation action and articlespace POV. --[[User:Amcbride|Allen]] ([[User talk:Amcbride|talk]]) 18:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. A full blackout is necessary only in case it passes. [[User:Pinkmango00|-SharonT]] ([[User talk:Pinkmango00|talk]]) 23:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' a soft blackout. We should raise people's awareness without stopping them from getting the information they need. [[User:QuartierLatin1968|Q·L·]]''[[User talk:QuartierLatin1968|1968]]'' [[Special:Contributions/QuartierLatin1968|☿]] 19:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Save the full blackout for if it gets to the full House and Senate for voting. [[User:Kaldari|Kaldari]] ([[User talk:Kaldari|talk]]) 20:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I don't like the idea of denying our users access to make a political point. An inconvenience, yes, but not a complete denial of service. [[User:Kaldari]] also makes a good point that things can get worse, and it would be helpful to have a way to up the ante. -- [[User:Gaurav|Gaurav]] ([[User talk:Gaurav|talk]]) 20:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' at this stage. Consider a full blackout only if it passes Congress and is on the President's desk. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 20:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' per Tryptofish. --[[User:Narayan89|Narayan89]] ([[User talk:Narayan89|talk]]) 20:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' per Madman et al. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 20:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' per Allen hello, i'm a [[User:Member|member]] | [[User talk:Member|talk to me!]] 20:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' '''[[User:Elektrik Shoos|elektrik]][[Special:Contributions/Elektrik Shoos|SHOOS]]''' ([[User talk:Elektrik Shoos|talk]]) 20:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' click-through blackout as a first choice, with limited support for a full blackout as well. [[User:Ojchase|Ojchase]] ([[User talk:Ojchase|talk]]) 20:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I don't think we should deny access to the site. We should have a screen to click through but not a denial of service. What if someone needs some information on that day are we really going to stop them from using Wikipedia just because some congressmen want to censor the internet? Remember the users of Wikipedia can complain to congressmen as much as they want but the congressmen are going to have the final call and we have no control. Punish congress not the general public. When you e-mail a congressmen who doesn't agree with you they basically tell you to go fly a kite. I know this from when I was fighting [[The Freedom of Choice Act]] both of my senators supported it, and they told me many times that they really didn't care that I opposed it. [[User:Etineskid|Etineskid]][[User talk:Etineskid|(talk)]] 21:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', but only if content of the blackout screen is made NPOV, no lobbying. Clicking through an extra screen is no major inconvenience. [[User:Peter Chastain|Peter Chastain]] ([[User talk:Peter Chastain|talk]]) 21:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:VQuakr|VQuakr]] ([[User talk:VQuakr|talk]]) 21:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I also support this option, mostly because of other parts of the web will be blacked out at the same time and the internet community will likely turn to us to get information about SOPA. [[User:Sławomir Biały|Sławomir Biały]] ([[User talk:Sławomir Biały|talk]]) 21:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' a ''firm'' blackout. Access is still possible, but every page will have some sort of splash screen or large banner that makes the wiki clunky to use. Also, link to related articles within the messages. I agree with Kaldari that a step by step approach would be prudent, but think that a middle ground approach should be adopted rather than the relatively weak "soft blackout" [[User:Hamtechperson|Ham]][[User talk:Hamtechperson|tech]][[Special:Contributions/Hamtechperson|person]] 23:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The blackout should take up the whole screen (at least on the first visit), but you should still be able to click through to the site. It should encourage people to contact their senators and rep, but it should not be required to see the site. Per Tryptofish, we should consider escalating to a true full blackout if it passes Congress. [[User:Superm401|Superm401]] - [[User_talk:Superm401|Talk]] 23:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - although I understand the appeal of a full blackout, i feel that might disrupt wikipedia users that have no control over the outcome of SOPA/PIPA (non- US residents) (see [[WP:POINT]]). -[[User talk:Tingrin87|TinGrin]] 23:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. An effective way to raise the issue of the bill without inconveniencing wikipedia users. [[User:Ajihood|Ajihood]] ([[User talk:Ajihood|talk]]) 23:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Support soft blackout. I'm not fully opposed to a full blackout, but I feel that a soft one is adequate to get the message across. Then again, I am one who typically ignores the "personal appeal" banners, so... [[User:Spiffulent|Spiffulent]] ([[User talk:Spiffulent|talk]]) 00:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:Aschmidt|Aschmidt]] ([[User talk:Aschmidt|talk]]) 00:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Epistemophiliac|Epistemophiliac]] ([[User talk:Epistemophiliac|talk]]) 00:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:William S. Saturn|William S. Saturn]] ([[User talk:William S. Saturn|talk]]) 00:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I support a soft blackout, because a full blackout is much more likely to inconvenience viewers than it is likely to create more activism. Many viewers use Wikipedia as an impulse search, notably for last minute research reports and a quick but detailed summary of someone/something. These people will likely stray from Wikipedia if it starts to delay content at any time, as they will instead find another source of information that doesn't delay information... if you get what I mean. [[Special:Contributions/173.188.59.151|173.188.59.151]] ([[User talk:173.188.59.151|talk]]) 02:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' A full blackout would have the perverse effect of preventing users from reading our articles on SOPA and related topics. Short of putting together a complete list of articles to save from the blackout (which would be difficult IMO), this is the best option. --[[User:Cybercobra|Cybercobra]] [[User talk:Cybercobra|(talk)]] 02:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Fylbecatulous|Fylbecatulous]] ([[User talk:Fylbecatulous|talk]]) 03:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# I '''support''' a soft blackout. A full blackout is the sort of thing we would consider if SOPA passed, and we felt that was preferable to operating under such a regime. While I understand the point of protesting before a law is passed, there also needs to be a way to "escalate" if it comes to that. I believe a soft blackout is the most proportionate response in terms of the perceived threat and what we are trying to accomplish. --[[User:Michael Snow|Michael Snow]] ([[User talk:Michael Snow|talk]]) 05:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# Full '''support''' to a soft blackout. [[User:ZipoBibrok5x10^8|ZipoBibrok5x10^8]] ([[User talk:ZipoBibrok5x10^8|talk]]) 05:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' We can raise awareness without inconveniencing WP readers & editors.--[[User:JayJasper|JayJasper]] ([[User talk:JayJasper|talk]]) 05:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', first choice. --[[User:Carnildo|Carnildo]] ([[User talk:Carnildo|talk]]) 06:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''; raises the issue prominently without compromising our mission in the meantime. {{[[User:Nihiltres|Nihiltres]]|[[User talk:Nihiltres|talk]]|[[Special:Contributions/Nihiltres|edits]]|[[WP:03|⚡]]}} 07:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. As SOPA begins to fundamentally challenge the openness of the internet that Wikipedia depends upon and exemplifies, and is relevant to the mission of free flowing information, I support taking a stance with a soft but firm blackout now --reserving a full blackout for future escalation should it occur. [[User:Evolauxia|Evolauxia]] ([[User talk:Evolauxia|talk]]) 07:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''<strike>Strong<strike> Support''' — <strike>I disagree with a full blackout because it would serve as an inconvenience for readers seeking information.</strike> But this is fine and gets the point across. Wikipedia has been making the internet not suck since 2001; SOPA is a major threat to everything we've worked so hard to build. It could very well make the internet suck, not just for the U.S., but for the world (for reasons of disclosure, I am from [[Canada|that country to the north where people play hockey, eat poutine, and suffix their sentences with "eh"]]). [[User:Master&Expert|'''Master&'''Expert]] ([[User talk:Master&Expert|Talk]]) 07:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Best option. [[User:Clegs|Clegs]] ([[User talk:Clegs|talk]]) 08:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Church of emacs|Tobias]] ([[User Talk:Church of emacs|Talk]]) 08:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' soft/mixed blackout. Set up the click through with the following 3 options (where the middle option is actually a full blackout):
#:*[pass-button-smileyface] Yes, I have contacted my representatives in Congress and the President in the past 7 days or will try to do so soon after using this website. Give me wikipedia!
#:*[leave-button-sadface] No, I don't find this website that useful. Bye.
#:*[pass-button] I appreciate wikipedia's urgency and gain from your share-alike copyright policy. Now, please just let me through. [[User:Hozelda|Hozelda]] ([[User talk:Hozelda|talk]]) 08:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' a click-through landing page. It gets the message out without interfering with Wikipedia's operation. --[[User:Scgtrp|scgtrp]] ([[User_talk:Scgtrp|talk]]) 08:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Good balance between varying interests, no actual denial of access, message is unavoidable and will reach large number of people. [[User:Littledman|Littledman]] ([[User talk:Littledman|talk]]) 08:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' but I prefer full blackout. --[[User:Juusohe|Juusohe]] ([[User talk:Juusohe|talk]]) 08:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Juusohe}}
#'''Support'''. Wikipedia is an important service, a prominent banner or all-black theme would also draw attention [[User:Rohan nog|Rohan nog]] ([[User talk:Rohan nog|talk]]) 08:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - I thought I already supported but my comment disappeared... in any case... support a soft-blackout. Some action needs to be taken. [[User:Shadowjams|Shadowjams]] ([[User talk:Shadowjams|talk]]) 09:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# ''Weak support'''. As I mentioned above, a full blackout is my preferred option. — [[:en:User:OwenBlacker|OwenBlacker]] ([[:en:User talk:OwenBlacker|Talk]]) 12:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Sole Soul|Sole Soul]] ([[User talk:Sole Soul|talk]]) 13:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Seb az86556|Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556]] [[User_talk:Seb_az86556|> haneʼ]] 14:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' People aren't just going to ignore it because they can click through it. When they first go on WP, they'll see something different and read it. --{{User-multi
|User=Imagine Wizard
|1=t
|2=c
|3=ct
|sup=
|doc=yes
}} [[Pig Latin|Iway amway Imagineway Izardway.]] 15:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Evalowyn|Evalowyn]] ([[User talk:Evalowyn|talk]]) 15:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]''' [[User talk:Salvio giuliano| Let's talk about it!]] 16:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Jamface1|Jamface1]] ([[User talk:Jamface1|talk]]) 17:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. But only for US, banners elsewhere. [[User:Petropetro|Petropetro]] ([[User talk:Petropetro|talk]]) 17:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support globally'''. [[User:Vegangel|Vegangel]] ([[User talk:Vegangel|talk]]) 18:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC) I agree with the comments that a hard blackout would leave many people confused and without access to good information. I also know that many Internet users globally are very vested in what happens with SOPA, and the opportunity to take action will be a welcome one. I also understand the objection to the "politicization of Wikipedia"; however, in light of the potential destruction of the site, I believe it's necessary for self-preservation. (Even Switzerland maintains an army should it be invaded.)
#'''Support'''. I feel that a "full" blackout without any access to information at all other than about SOPA would be bothersome to some users and would just ignore Wikipedia completely for that date. I agree with what [[User:Michael Snow|Michael Snow]] said above. [[User:Xxcom9a|Xxcom9a]] ([[User talk:Xxcom9a|talk]]) 19:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support as second choice''' Wiki going dark would make things clearer, but this is a good second-best. [[User:Xero Xenith|Xero Xenith]] ([[User talk:Xero Xenith|talk]]) 20:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support as second choice''' full blackout is better, but a soft blackout will do as well. —[[User:TheDJ|TheDJ]] ([[User talk:TheDJ|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TheDJ|contribs]]) 20:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' as it should do the job (it's effectively a nag screen) without being too hard on the user collective (whose fault SOPA really isn't). [[User:Dysmorodrepanis|Dysmorodrepanis]] ([[User talk:Dysmorodrepanis|talk]]) 21:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:CristoperB|CristoperB]] ([[User talk:CristoperB|talk]]) 22:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Powergate92|Powergate92]][[User talk:Powergate92|Talk]] 22:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:A Dirty Watermelon|A Dirty Watermelon]]
#'''Support''' a global soft blackout. This will notify all users that would be affected by SOPA/PIPA without making wikipedia useless for those who need information for unrelated reasons. [[User:Warren Dew|Warren Dew]] ([[User talk:Warren Dew|talk]]) 23:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. as a starting point this should be enough to create awareness among users [[User:Sayan rc|Sayan rc]] ([[User talk:Sayan rc|talk]]) 23:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' for the same reasons as [[User:Warren Dew|Warren Dew]] [[User:JB82|JB82]] ([[User talk:JB82|talk]]) 00:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Support''' We must take a stand, for the future of Wikipedia is at stake. However, we mustn't harm the flow of knowledge. Global soft-blackout please. [[User:CR90|CRRays]][[User talk:CR90|Head90]] | [[Special:Contributions/CRRaysHead90|We Believe!]] 00:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Katana|Katana]] ([[User talk:Katana|talk]]) 01:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Jclemens|Jclemens]] ([[User talk:Jclemens|talk]]) 04:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', I support a soft blackout globally. There must be better ways to protect copyright holders than to alter how the Internet works. --[[User:Joe2832|Joe2832]]
#'''Support''' global soft blackout. A full blackout, even a temporary one, seems contrary to Wikipeida's stated goal of full, unencumbered access to information. [[User:ThreePointOneFour|3.14]] ([[User talk:ThreePointOneFour|talk]]) 06:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' global soft blackout. [[User:Haha169|haha169]] ([[User talk:Haha169|talk]]) 06:54, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support outside US''' Brings needed attention to this issue, but doesn't fully hinder users outside US, who are outside US jurisdiction --[[User:Kpengboy|Kpengboy]] ([[User talk:Kpengboy|talk]]) 09:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' a soft global blackout, as what happens with this legislation enactment would affect material Wikipedia accesss worldwide.[[User:Wpollard|Bill Pollard]] ([[User talk:Wpollard|talk]]) 13:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' as second option, either US or global. -- [[User:Cobi|Cobi]]([[User talk:Cobi|t]]|[[Special:Contributions/Cobi|c]]|[[User:ClueBot Commons/Bots|b]]) 14:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:BenFrantzDale|—Ben FrantzDale]] ([[User talk:BenFrantzDale|talk]]) 16:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. US only --[[User:CatMan61|CatMan61]] ([[User talk:CatMan61|talk]]) 16:53, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Oppose =====
# '''Strong Oppose''' - if Wikipedia institutes this blackout that really isn't a blackout at all, there will be multiple news reports that we did not join in the blackout but rather chose to add a banner without blacking out the site. This will only encourage congress to press forward with SOPA. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 17:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#:How would that encourage Congress? – [[User:GorillaWarfare|GorillaWarfare]] [[User talk:GorillaWarfare|(talk)]] 17:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#::A Wikipedia blackout will discourage congress. therefor doing this (not having a blackout) will encourage them. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 09:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Meh'''. I think I've seen enough banners on Wikipedia that I'd mentally zoom out and not read it. [[User:ASCIIn2Bme|ASCIIn2Bme]] ([[User talk:ASCIIn2Bme|talk]]) 17:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#: The soft-blackout option doesn't describe just a banner. As stated above, it'd be a landing page with an explanation of why this is being done and links to information about SOPA, which the user would have to click through to reach Wikipedia. (There would also be banners, once the user proceeds to the main site.) Some people will still tune out and not read it, certainly, but it wouldn't be presented as "just another banner", in the same form as the ones most of us subconsciously tune out by now. [[User:FeRD NYC|FeRD_NYC]] ([[User talk:FeRD NYC|talk]]) 18:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Weak Oppose'''. Juxtaposed against a hard blackout, I oppose this as weaksauce. The inconvenience of a hard blackout makes the point we need to make better than anything else. But if this option is what the community decides, it's far better than nothing. [[User:Stevietheman|'''Stevie is the man!''']] [[User talk:Stevietheman|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Stevietheman|Work]] 18:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' Sorry, I think Wikipedia should stay out of politics for the stated reason in my above votes. Think we should call our Congressman and members of the Judiciary Committee that drafted the bill. [[User:Mugginsx|Mugginsx]] ([[User talk:Mugginsx|talk]]) 19:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Very Strong Oppose''' - Wikipedia must shut down temporarily in order to threat the Houses and attract people attention. [[User:SiPlus|SiPlus]] ([[User talk:SiPlus|talk]]) 19:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' in the way that I think that Wikipedia should not go in soft-blackout, but in full blackout! [[User:Jurjenb|Jurjenb]] ([[User talk:Jurjenb|talk]]) 20:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - Do not need soft or full blackout, rather have simply a banner describing issue. '''[[User:Dough4872|Dough]][[User talk:Dough4872|48]][[Special:Contributions/Dough4872|72]]''' 02:53, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Oppose''' - Wikipedia has not and should not participate in the game of politics. '''[[WP:NOTADVOCATE]]''' and '''[[WP:DISRUPTPOINT]]'''. While I do feel SOPA is an absolutely horrible idea that will be of little benefit, by getting involved we only hurt ourselves. There is little to gain through any participation across the Wikimedia projects. If anything, it will only hurt the users of Wikipedia while having little to no impact on the decision making in regards to SOPA. [[User:Slazenger|'''--Slazenger''']] ([[User talk:Slazenger|Contact Me]]) 03:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#:Wikipedia should always defend itself against threats to its existence and/or to what gives it its power. It would be an injustice to have the ability to educate the users over such an important matter to Wikipedia (while they still have time to act and stop it) yet fail to do so. Many Wikipedia users will have much more to lose by not having been informed than had they been informed of the seriousness of this even if it meant Wikipedia getting a little "unclean". A little "wound" is better than death. [[User:Hozelda|Hozelda]] ([[User talk:Hozelda|talk]]) 15:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong oppose'''. It is not Wikipedia's place to be playing politics, and this is, by definition, a political issue. If the fundamental freedoms of Americans are being harmed by this legislation then it is a matter for the courts to revoke, just like any other issue. While the Wikimedia Foundation's mandate does include the promotion of open source (thus opposition to this bill might be within that mandate), that is ''clearly not'' the mandate of Wikipedia itself. Wikipedia should ''never'' be used as a tool for ''any'' political purpose, including as directed by the Wikimedia Foundation. -'''[[User:M.nelson|M.Nelson]]''' ([[User talk:M.nelson|talk]]) 07:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#:I completely disagree that going down with a sinking ship is a better option than warning the captain and guests of impending danger while they still have time to act. [[User:Hozelda|Hozelda]] ([[User talk:Hozelda|talk]]) 15:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' because we need a '''full''' balckout. [[User:Urbanus Secundus|Urbanus Secundus]] ([[User talk:Urbanus Secundus|talk]]) 07:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#Per Urbanus Secundus. —[[User talk:WFCforLife|WFC]]— 08:15, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong oppose'''. Please see the [[meta:Fundraising 2011/Brandon Letter/en|quote of Brandon Haris]], which we used for fundraising. '''The site is not and should never be a propaganda tool'''. These kind of actions will ruin Wikipedia. --[[User:Vssun|Vssun]] ([[User talk:Vssun|talk]]) 12:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Oppose'''. Unlikely to make a significant difference. [[User:Axl|'''Axl''']] ¤ [[User talk:Axl|[Talk]]] 13:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''oPPOSE'''What is the purpose of a soft blockout... a screen that nobody notices or cares about?---'''[[User:Balloonman|Balloonman]]''' ''[[User talk:Balloonman|Poppa Balloon]]'' 15:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. This is a weak proposal which would say "we care, but not a lot". --[[User:FormerIP|FormerIP]] ([[User talk:FormerIP|talk]]) 16:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. As many people have said, we internet users are so very accustomed to and trained by click-through screens and banner ads. Also agree with FormerIP's comment above. I support option 1.2.3 (global) If SOPA passes, won't ''it'' propagate through the entire world? — [[Special:Contributions/Cognatus|chirographa]] [[User talk:Cognatus|diverbia]] [[User:Cognatus|cognatō]] 16:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' in favour of a full blackout. This issue needs to hit every major news organization, and that will only happen if Wikipedia is *unavailable*. [[User:Wonderstruck|Wonderstruck]] ([[User talk:Wonderstruck|talk]]) 16:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. This is ''slightly'' better than a full blackout, but only marginally. It's a terrible idea for the exact same reasons. The only advantage is that it doesn't inconvenience users quite as much. [[User:Modest Genius|Modest Genius]] [[User_talk:Modest Genius|talk]] 17:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#[[WP:SOAP|Wikipedia is not a soapbox]]. [[User:Lagrange613|Lagrange]][[User talk:Lagrange613#top|613]] 18:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong oppose''' We may as well do nothing as use banners. Note [[banner blindness]] is a bluelink. [[User:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|Short Brigade Harvester Boris]] ([[User talk:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|talk]]) 18:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Second choice''', a distant second compared to full blackout. We have an alarm bell, if we sound it, we sound it, and we try to get as much attention as possible. SOPA is setting a light to the Internet- you don't call "Fire" in a whispered voice. Still, support over doing nothing. --[[User:HectorMoffet|HectorMoffet]] ([[User talk:HectorMoffet|talk]]) 19:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' A click-through is not enough.--[[User:Hacky|hacky]] ([[User talk:Hacky|talk]]) 19:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' People will just click continue as if the "blackout" was some sort of advert. A proper blackout or nothing in my opinion [[User:Andrewmc123|<big>Andrewmc</big>]][[User talk:Andrewmc123|123]] 20:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Oppose''' When Wikipedia goes down the road of expressing consensus opinions in banners and, worse, attempting to block access to anyone based on politically considerations, at least two things happen: (1) Wikipedia begin to lose whatever claim it has to openness and the balance of a diverse community; and (2) goes down the road of declaring itself a political partisan.
#'''Support''' All the way, or no way. [[User:Spaceshuttlediscovery|Spaceshuttlediscovery]] ([[User talk:Spaceshuttlediscovery|talk]]) 00:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' A soft blackout is pointless.--[[User:Metallurgist|Metallurgist]] ([[User talk:Metallurgist|talk]]) 01:26, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - Only a "true" blackout with make people care! • [[User:Sbmeirow|Sbmeirow]] • [[User talk:Sbmeirow|Talk]] • 01:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Oppose''' --[[User:Hubertl-AT|Hubertl-AT]] ([[User talk:Hubertl-AT|talk]]) 02:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Oppose'''. [[User:Cabal2122|Cabal2122]] ([[User talk:Cabal2122|talk]]) 02:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC) PLEASE DON'T DO THIS! If a statement is going to be made, it needs to be loud! not something that can just be shrugged off or ignored.
#'''Oppose''', same rationale as for the full blackout oppose in the section above. [[User:TechnoSymbiosis|TechnoSymbiosis]] ([[User talk:TechnoSymbiosis|talk]]) 03:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''', People are used to passing advertisement without reading, so they just ignore it (as they love the next button during installation) . But when you really face an obstacle, is the time that you start reading what's wrong. By soft black out, the majority won't learn about SOAPA.[[User:Bossudenotredame|Bossudenotredame]] ([[User talk:Bossudenotredame|talk]]) 04:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. This will look like another bunch of advertisements to people and not lead to the same effect as a full blackout would. --[[User:BloodyRose|Bloody Rose]] ([[User talk:BloodyRose|talk]]) 05:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. I initially supported a soft "click-through" blackout, but it occured to me that the average internet user is already quite accustomed to ignoring advertisements and promotions. A banner - or even an entire page - that can be easily bypassed will end up being ignored by far too many readers. This message is too important to be blithely dismissed, which is why I am convinced that the blackout needs to be as disruptive as possible (in the short term) in order for the direness of the situation to be fully communicated. --[[User:Foolishgrunt|Foolishgrunt]] ([[User talk:Foolishgrunt|talk]]) 07:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. This protest needs to be about the *absence* of information, since that's ultimately what SOPA/PIPA will result in. If visitors can get the information they want with a single click, then we're not making our point. [[User:JSarek|jSarek]] ([[User talk:JSarek|talk]]) 07:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - simply a useless annoyance [[User:Jw2036|Jw2036]] ([[User talk:Jw2036|talk]]) 12:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' This bill will not pass Congress, despite the fears of uneducated Internet users, and even if it would it would not impact Wikipedia. [[User:Shii|Shii]] [[user_talk:Shii|(tock)]] 12:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' because this won't have the impact on people as the full blackout will. [[User:Saiarcot895|Saiarcot895]] ([[User talk:Saiarcot895|talk]]) 14:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' There won't be any click-through option if SOPA/PIPA passes. --[[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan (talk)]] 16:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' NPOV blackout. [[User:Sebleouf|Sebleouf]] ([[User talk:Sebleouf|talk]]) 17:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Comments =====
*Request: Could those saying that this option is a second choice or last resort please ''consider'' changing their vote to "Weak Oppose"? From where I'm sitting, the vote for this option appears to be more lopsided than it really is. [[User:Stevietheman|'''Stevie is the man!''']] [[User talk:Stevietheman|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Stevietheman|Work]] 19:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

==== What will be shown on the blackout page? ====

Information given will include a brief description of the issue, with links that allow users to identify members of their local congressional delegation and provide sample text that a user may send to oppose the bill. The Wikimedia Foundation will support the development of the necessary software for this purpose. The purpose of this action is to capture media attention and drive a significant volume of telephone calls from constituents.

===== Support =====
#'''Support'''. --[[User:AbderrahmanNajjar|Abderrahman]] ([[User talk:AbderrahmanNajjar|talk]]) 15:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' '''[[User:Fluttershy|Flutter]][[User talk:Fluttershy|shy]]''' ''[[Tripcode|!xmcuvg2MH]]'' 18:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:Sovereignlance|Sovereignlance]] ([[User talk:Sovereignlance|talk]]) 06:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:Bulwersator|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator|talk]]) 17:58, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:Kansan|Kansan]] ([[User talk:Kansan|talk]]) 17:59, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 18:07, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:Orashmatash|Orashmatash]] ([[User talk:Orashmatash|talk]]) 18:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# -[[User:Djsasso|DJSasso]] ([[User talk:Djsasso|talk]]) 18:10, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] [[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]] 18:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# – [[User:Andrew Hampe|Andrew Hampe]] [[User talk:Andrew Hampe|Talk]] 18:19, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:Prolog|Prolog]] ([[User talk:Prolog|talk]]) 18:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:Mathias Schindler|Mathias Schindler]] ([[User talk:Mathias Schindler|talk]]) 18:48, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# More or less. I think driving personal, heartfelt e-mail, mail, and phone communications should be the main goal. The template should be just a starting point. [[User:Dcoetzee|Dcoetzee]] 18:58, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# --[[User:Teukros|Teukros]] ([[User talk:Teukros|talk]]) 19:07, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# Generally with things like this, numbers are the most important thing, since congressional staff will be far too overwhelmed to read many individual emails. Of course, we want to give people the ability to articulate things for themselves if they want, but a basic template that will appeal to most Wikipedia readers (once they understand the stakes) will probably be most effective for effecting change.--[[User:Ragesoss|Ragesoss]] ([[User talk:Ragesoss|talk]]) 19:10, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# ---Not every email needs to be read for an influence to be had. A large quantity of emails will likely have much more effect than one or two well-written ones.— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Msheets1|Msheets1]] ([[User talk:Msheets1|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Msheets1|contribs]]) 08:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:Michael Snow|Michael Snow]] ([[User talk:Michael Snow|talk]]) 19:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:Andreas Werle|Andreas Werle]] ([[User talk:Andreas Werle|talk]]) 20:00, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' This is an important step in making the effort worth its while. [[User:LoriLee|LoriLee]] ([[User talk:LoriLee|talk]]) 20:09, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# Support, but users should be encouraged to personalize their message. [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]] [[User talk:Ocaasi|t ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Ocaasi| c]] 20:13, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# Yes, please. [[User:First Light|First Light]] ([[User talk:First Light|talk]]) 20:35, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:Selery|Selery]] ([[User talk:Selery|talk]]) 21:26, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 22:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# --[[User:Jesant13|Jesant13]] ([[User talk:Jesant13|talk]]) 22:05, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#--[[User:DfizzleShizzle|DfizzleShizzle]] ([[User talk:DfizzleShizzle|talk]]) 22:13, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Zenimpulse|Zenimpulse]] ([[User talk:Zenimpulse|talk]]) 23:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Jfeise|jfeise]] ([[User talk:Jfeise|talk]]) 00:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', [[User:Jed 20012|Captain Gamma]] ([[User talk:Jed 20012|talk]]) 01:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - Nothing else works. --'''[[User:Jeffwang|J]] [[User_talk:Jeffwang|(t)]]''' 01:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' ~[[User:Feedintm|Feedintm]][[User talk:Feedintm|Parley]] 02:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support.''' --[[User:Mr.98|Mr.98]] ([[User talk:Mr.98|talk]]) 02:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Revelian|Revelian]] ([[User talk:Revelian|talk]]) 02:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Information should relate to both SOPA and PIPA [[User:TNLNYC|TNL]] ([[User talk:TNLNYC|talk]]) 03:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# Keep only the SOPA and PIPA articles open for people to learn about the issues. ''' [[User:Marlith|Marlith]][[User talk:Marlith| (Talk)]] ''' 03:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' If a Wikipedia blackout doesn't get their attention, this most likely will. [[User:Jessemv|Jessemv]] ([[User talk:Jessemv|talk]]) 03:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', first choice. [[User:TotientDragooned|TotientDragooned]] ([[User talk:TotientDragooned|talk]]) 03:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', first choice. [[User:byelf2007|byelf2007]] ([[User talk:byelf2007|talk]]) around 4:45 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:JohnnyLurg|JohnnyLurg]] ([[User talk:JohnnyLurg|talk]]) 05:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' '''[[User:UpstateNYer|upstate]][[User talk:UpstateNYer|NYer]]''' 06:18, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Tgeairn|Tgeairn]] ([[User talk:Tgeairn|talk]]) 06:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# Persons from outside the USA should be urged to contact their lawmakers with concerns they might have about how SOPA would effect commerce, freedom, and the internet in their own countries.([[User:Drn8|Drn8]] ([[User talk:Drn8|talk]]) 07:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC))
# Well, um, this makes sense. The message should be different for US and international visitors if a global blackout is implemented though. [[User talk:Sonia|sonia]]♫ 07:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:CharlieEchoTango|CharlieEchoTango]] ([[User talk:CharlieEchoTango#top|contact]]) 07:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:Seewolf|Seewolf]] ([[User talk:Seewolf|talk]]) 08:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' '''[[User:Elektrik Shoos|elektrik]][[Special:Contributions/Elektrik Shoos|SHOOS]]''' ([[User talk:Elektrik Shoos|talk]]) 08:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:killemall22|killemall22]] ([[User talk:killemall22|talk]]) 010:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - If possible. [[User:CT Cooper|CT Cooper]] · [[User talk:CT Cooper|talk]] 12:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', especially as part of a full blackout. Any blackout would be useless without giving people instructions on how to help turn back this horrible legislation. [[User:Stevietheman|'''Stevie is the man!''']] [[User talk:Stevietheman|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Stevietheman|Work]] 15:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Any reasonable text is fine. The most important part for me is an explanation of SOPA. [[User:Hans Adler|Hans]] [[User talk:Hans Adler|Adler]] 15:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Obviously informing the public about the issue and helping them easily make their voice heard is integral, and in my view the only reason for having the blackout. --[[User_talk:Trödel|Trödel]] 15:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Common sense. [[User:AndyTheGrump|AndyTheGrump]] ([[User talk:AndyTheGrump|talk]]) 15:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' per [[User:Drn8|Drn8]]. [[User:Carlsmith|Carlsmith]] ([[User talk:Carlsmith|talk]]) 16:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' People should know why WikiPedia blacked out the site. --[[User:Clarkcj12|Clarkcj12]] ([[User talk:Clarkcj12|talk]]) 19:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' The inclusion of information about SOPA (whether it be on the blackout page itself or as a link to the Wikipedia article) is very important, in addition to the take action instructions. [[User:Perlit|Perlit]] ([[User talk:Perlit|talk]]) 20:02, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' This allows users to know who to contact in opposition to this bill. [[User:Etineskid|Etineskid]][[User talk:Etineskid|(talk)]] 21:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' ofc [[User:Von Restorff|Von Restorff]] ([[User talk:Von Restorff|talk]]) 22:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Lonewolf9196|Lonewolf9196]] ([[User talk:Lonewolf9196|talk]]) 03:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Jkvannort|jkv]] ([[User talk:Jkvannort|talk]]) 04:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''--[[User:JayJasper|JayJasper]] ([[User talk:JayJasper|talk]]) 06:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Theadorerex|Theadorerex]] ([[User talk:Theadorerex|talk]]) 07:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Soewinhan|<big>'''S'''</big>'''WH''']] [[User talk:Soewinhan|talk]] 07:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:TheCatalyst31|TheCatalyst31]] [[User talk:TheCatalyst31|Reaction]]•[[Special:Contributions/TheCatalyst31|Creation]] 09:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Luna Ariya|Luna Ariya]] ([[User talk:Luna Ariya|talk]]) 09:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. – Plarem ([[User:Plarem|User]] [[User talk:Plarem|talk]]) 10:07, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Xjmos|Xjmos]] ([[User talk:Xjmos|talk]]) 10:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. There should definitely be links on how US readers can contact their legislators. — [[:en:User:OwenBlacker|OwenBlacker]] ([[:en:User talk:OwenBlacker|Talk]]) 12:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''' [[User:Andrewmc123|<big>Andrewmc</big>]][[User talk:Andrewmc123|123]] 13:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''support''' [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 14:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I see no evidence that charities can't take part in any political lobbying or commentary - as discussed at [[Wikipedia_talk:SOPA_initiative#Wikimedia_is_legally_a_charity_-_are_such_political_acts_allowed.3F]]. Maybe someone info on users for outside the US - whilst I'm fine with a global blackout or banner, it's probably best not to word it assuming all readers are in the US. [[User:Mdwh|Mdwh]] ([[User talk:Mdwh|talk]]) 14:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:yankhadenuf|yankhadenuf]] Too silly for Wiki, but if it were my website, I would first inquire about copyright for popular 1987 PSA "This is your brain on drugs" by Partnership for a Drug-Free America, and then have banner include blackout and text: "This is your brain on SOPA"
#'''Support'''. --[[User:FormerIP|FormerIP]] ([[User talk:FormerIP|talk]]) 16:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. ... [[User:discospinster|'''disco''''''''spinster''''']] [[User talk:discospinster|'''talk''']] 16:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:Pym1507]] 19:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC).
#'''Support'''. [[User:Powergate92|Powergate92]][[User talk:Powergate92|Talk]] 22:48, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Alyeska|Alyeska]] ([[User talk:Alyeska|talk]]) 22:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Sayan rc|Sayan rc]] ([[User talk:Sayan rc|talk]]) 00:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' More publicity is better to bring this bill to its knees. [[User:Spaceshuttlediscovery|Spaceshuttlediscovery]] ([[User talk:Spaceshuttlediscovery|talk]]) 00:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Bigturtle|Bigturtle]] ([[User talk:Bigturtle|talk]]) 01:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''--[[User:Metallurgist|Metallurgist]] ([[User talk:Metallurgist|talk]]) 01:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. As mentioned above, international users need to be well catered for too. [[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 02:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Noleander|Noleander]] ([[User talk:Noleander|talk]]) 02:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:yrtneg|--]][[user:yrtneg|'''yrtneg''']] ([[User talk:Yrtneg|talk]]) [[Wikipedia:SOPA initiative/Action|STOP SOPA NOW!]] 03:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Conditional Support'''. This seems to be well-suited for a US audience, but I do believe the banner needs to be made relevant to international readers, as the bill would have ramifications for them as well. Care should be taken to illustrate how the bill would affect them, as well as what they can do (if anything) to join the opposition. --[[User:Foolishgrunt|Foolishgrunt]] ([[User talk:Foolishgrunt|talk]]) 07:28, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''.
#'''Support'''. [[User:SteveStrummer|SteveStrummer]] ([[User talk:SteveStrummer|talk]]) 07:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Kpengboy|Kpengboy]] ([[User talk:Kpengboy|talk]]) 10:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:SongO|SongO]] ([[User talk:SongO|talk]]) 11:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Dimtsit|Dimtsit]] ([[User talk:Dimtsit|talk]]) 12:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] [[User talk:Miyagawa|(talk)]] 12:49, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Petru Dimitriu|Petru Dimitriu]] ([[User talk:Petru Dimitriu|talk]]) 13:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#[[User:Annabel|Annabel]] ([[User talk:Annabel|talk]]) 13:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Ente75]] ([[User talk:Ente75|talk]]) 14:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support.''' [[User:Dkasak|Denis Kasak]] ([[User talk:Dkasak|talk]]) 14:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#[[User:Migdejong|Migdejong]] ([[User talk:Migdejong|talk]]) 15:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan (talk)]] 16:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#[[User:Sebbe xy|Sebbe xy]] ([[User talk:Sebbe xy|talk]]) 17:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Oppose =====
# ..[[User:Youreallycan | '''Youreallycan''']] 17:56, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# .. [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 18:19, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# .. And not mention the [[Online Protection and Enforcement of Digital Trade Act|OPEN Act]]? --[[User:Radiokid1010|Radiokid1010]] ([[User talk:Radiokid1010|talk]]) 18:48, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#:Second mentioning the OPEN Act per the rationale [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASOPA_initiative&diff=471058720&oldid=471055294 I've given previously]. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] ([[User talk:Michaeldsuarez|talk]]) 19:13, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#::I'm worried that fighting ''for'' something that really doesn't affect us has very different legal implications than fighting ''against'' something that could hurt us. [[User:Selery|Selery]] ([[User talk:Selery|talk]]) 21:25, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#:::I'm only advocating allowing visitors to know that the OPEN Act exists as an alternative to SOPA. A mention of it won't hurt. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] ([[User talk:Michaeldsuarez|talk]]) 22:05, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#::::Addendum: It would also be against Wikipedia's principles to hide or exclude information. Not allowing visitors to learn of the OPEN Act's existence would be both non-neutral and manipulative. Our task should be to place all relevant information about SOPA at the fingertips, so that visitors could make complete, informed decisions on their own. Without knowledge of SOPA alternatives, visitors won't have a full picture to base their decisions on. Excluding any mention of the OPEN Act would be the same as Wikipedia manipulating visitors not to mention it in their messages to Congress. Instead, we should allow visitors to chose whether or not to mention the OPEN Act, but they can't make that choice if they don't know about the OPEN Act. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] ([[User talk:Michaeldsuarez|talk]]) 00:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose sample text'''. This could be interpreted as going against the foundation's charity-status. [[User:Seb az86556|Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556]] [[User_talk:Seb_az86556|> haneʼ]] 00:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#:::It's important to say that the Foundation's general counsel will clear/screen the text. [[User:Philippe (WMF)|Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation]] ([[User talk:Philippe (WMF)|talk]]) 00:59, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#::::I was assuming as much; I still do think that it's risky no matter the wording. (btw, it's not the only reason I oppose a sample-text; I do believe people who read wikipedia are literate enough to write their own short rant) [[User:Seb az86556|Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556]] [[User_talk:Seb_az86556|> haneʼ]] 01:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' Can WMF legally advocate for/against legislation in the US? I support the blackout and raising awareness on a coordinated day, but I think "call Congress and tell them what you think" is about as political was WMF can/should get.[[User:KevinCuddeback|KevinCuddeback]] ([[User talk:KevinCuddeback|talk]]) 03:05, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose as written''' ("sample text that a user may send to oppose the bill"). It seems clear that WMF can legally do minor lobbying, but to do so would destroy the reputation for NPOV that we have worked so hard to maintain. I would '''support''' an NPOV blackout screen with links to impartial analysis of how SOPA would affect Wikipedia, and links for contacting congress, with no recommendation as to what people should tell their representatives. Res ipsa loquatur (let it speak for itself). [[User:Peter Chastain|Peter Chastain]] ([[User talk:Peter Chastain|talk]]) 21:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Very Strong Oppose''' WP Should not be used for political activism, if it does it should lose it's non-profit status. [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel|talk]]) 23:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Oppose''' - Wikipedia has not and should not participate in the game of politics. '''[[WP:NOTADVOCATE]]''' and '''[[WP:DISRUPTPOINT]]'''. While I do feel SOPA is an absolutely horrible idea that will be of little benefit, by getting involved we only hurt ourselves. There is little to gain through any participation across the Wikimedia projects. If anything, it will only hurt the users of Wikipedia while having little to no impact on the decision making in regards to SOPA. [[User:Slazenger|'''--Slazenger''']] ([[User talk:Slazenger|Contact Me]]) 04:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong Oppose''' - I expect our readers would not take kindly to being told to lobby their congresspeople by their encyclopaedia, particularly non-US ones. Asking for donations is one thing (and even that causes controversy every year), asking our readers to take political action on our behalf is quite another. [[User:Robofish|Robofish]] ([[User talk:Robofish|talk]]) 13:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)`
#Strong Oppose - per robofish [[User:Jake.edu|Jake.edu]] ([[User talk:Jake.edu|talk]]) 16:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' - any blackout page shown outside the US should also include relevant links for the country in which it is shown. [[User:Jamface1|Jamface1]] ([[User talk:Jamface1|talk]]) 17:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Wikipedia policy is to provide information regarding all sides of a question and to let the user decide what to believe. The blackout page should only describe the effect that SOPA/PIPA would have on Wikipedia, and let the user figure out for himself whether that's a problem and what the appropriate action is. Or to put it another way, I trust our users to be able to figure out that it's a problem, and I don't think we have to ram that down their throats. [[User:Warren Dew|Warren Dew]] ([[User talk:Warren Dew|talk]]) 00:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Comments =====
* What does it mean to 'oppose' this? That there should be no information given on the page - that it would just be a blank screen? Or are people opposing certain aspects of it - e.g. opposing the "links that allow users to identify members of their local congressional delegation" but supporting a brief description of the issue? [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 18:49, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
* The [[Online Protection and Enforcement of Digital Trade Act|OPEN Act]] should really be mentioned as an alternative action. --[[User:Radiokid1010|Radiokid1010]] ([[User talk:Radiokid1010|talk]]) 19:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
* Make sure that the title and opening paragraph of the page is designed to be large and brief enough to grab any reader's attention. - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 01:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
* Explain for international users what SOPA is and why it affects Wikipedia. --[[User:Dialh|Dial]] ([[User talk:Dialh|talk]]) 04:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
*If we are to proceed and go through with this, and at this point it appears quite likely that we will, then the Foundation's execution should be reflexive of our core community values to the greatest extent possible. As was once articulated by [[user:Karada|Karada]] and subsequently espoused by one of our most fundamental policies: ''You won't even need to say [Saddam Hussein] was evil. That is why the article on Hitler does not start with "Hitler was a bad man"—we don't need to, his deeds convict him a thousand times over. We just list the facts of the Holocaust dispassionately, and the voices of the dead cry out afresh in a way that makes name-calling both pointless and unnecessary. Please do the same: list Saddam's crimes, and cite your sources. Resist the temptation to apply labels or moralize—readers will probably not take kindly to being told what to think. Let the facts speak for themselves and let the reader decide.'' The same maturity and discretion should be exhibited here if we're going to take this stand. All associated material—including "sample text"—should strive to be candid, concrete, objective, and strictly informative. In the event that we decide to educate readers about alternative legislative proposals, such information should not be presented in a way that implies endorsement. And lastly, drafts should be written up '''''now''''' so that the material can be available for open commentary before and up until the last minute.   '''''— '''''[[User:CMBJ|'''''C M B J''''']]   09:02, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
**'''This''' I am fully in agreement with. Though I argued in my '''Suppport''' comments for (1) above that [[WP:NPOV]] shouldn't restrict the community itself from having a viewpoint, nor prevent our mobilizing on actions such as this, our '''execution''' of those actions should exemplify the highest principles of the Wikipedia project. The anti-SOPA information at plenty of other sites is understandable (and justifiably) alarmist and opinionated. Ours should, in contrast, reflect the same [[WP:NPOV|neutrality]] we all (ideally) strive for in each and every article edit. [[User:FeRD NYC|FeRD_NYC]] ([[User talk:FeRD NYC|talk]]) 10:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
* Why develop new technology? While I do not agree with all postures taken by the [[Electronic Frontier Foundation|EFF]], I think that working with them by having a link to [[https://action.eff.org/o/9042/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=8173]] prevents waste due to redundant Wikipedia technology efforts while it also shows a more unified front to the proponents of SOPA. The EFF also allows non-US citizens to donate money to the EFF. While that money can't even be earmarked for SOPA-only issues, I think that SOPA is a big enough problem that cooperating with an organization such as the EFF is simply the smart thing to do. Isn't there some saying about my enemy's enemy... SOPA is a big deal and we should treat it as such. [[User:Neil Smithline|Neil Smithline]] ([[User talk:Neil Smithline|talk]]) 20:21, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
** Maybe it is a good idea to place also a link for the [[Avaaz]]'s [http://www.avaaz.org/en/save_the_internet/?slideshow "Save the Internet!" campaign] for the same purpose. If there are other similar campaigns from other well reputed non-profit organizations, may also have links. That is, instead of links to commercial sites as Facebook or Twitter. [[User:Dimtsit|Dimtsit]] ([[User talk:Dimtsit|talk]]) 12:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
* My [[User:Neil Smithline|user page]] describes a situation of how I responded to a temporary Wikipedia outage. Perhaps a collection of quotes from users about what it would mean for the Wikipedia to be down or sufficiently diminished in quality would have a powerful affect on the blackout page or the banner ads. (Whatever you do, no more faces of Wikipedia employees though.) They can be labeled as "From a real user like you" or something. This would allow a wide and disparate range of motivations to be stated, hopefully allowing more users to relate to the motivations. Perhaps this can go in banner ads instead or in addition to the blackout page? [[User:Neil Smithline|Neil Smithline]] ([[User talk:Neil Smithline|talk]]) 20:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
* Readers in the US should be encouraged to telephone or mail their Congressperson and Senators, ''not'' email them - it's known that email is regarded as something it's all too easy to get a campaign to generate, and consequently emails are easy to discount and do not carry nearly the same weight as the volume of physical mail and telephone calls. -- [[User:Arwel Parry|Arwel Parry]] [[User_talk:Arwel Parry|(talk)]] 23:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
*I would just like to point out the Wikipedia should not lose non-profit status, as I understand it, unless it endorses specific candidates. Issues advocacy is fine. That's why we don't tax the Mormon and Catholic churches for their anti-gay advocacy. --[[User:Quintucket|Quintucket]] ([[User talk:Quintucket|talk]]) 14:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Any political action—which make no mistake, this is what this protest boils down to—is the equivalent of swinging the [[Big Stick ideology|big stick]] for us. Doing a half-assed swing of the stick removes the power inherent in the Wikipedia community taking a stance on anything. As such, swing the stick all the way, with a full global blackout. [[User:Titoxd|Titoxd]]([[User talk:Titoxd|?!?]] - [[WP:FAC|cool stuff]]) 23:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)0
* I support a full blackout of most regular content, with the caveat that rather than just one screen of "here's what you should do" there be that *plus* a clickthrough to substantial amount of info on SOPA and related issues to be selected by an empowered panel of respected editors. Give frustrated ppl a chance to learn some things. (Full blackout makes the strongest possible statement & will be a wakeup call to the people of the world in what looks to be a historic year of global activism and global debate.) [[User:Praghmatic|Praghmatic]] ([[User talk:Praghmatic|talk]]) 00:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
* I support a variety of this where the link to click though is hidden in the description of SOPA & PIPA, forcing people to read this before looking at anything else. [[User:Jweisblat|Jweisblat]] ([[User talk:jweisblat|talk]]) 02:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Jweisblat}}
* SOPA sucks. But years ago, because of firsthand experience with lobbying, I stopped believing that contacting Congresscritters really accomplished anything. The crooks have long since figured out how to make most of the public think their opinion matters, while actually doing whatever Congresscritters' paymasters tell 'em to do. They do a little dance with one chamber pretending to fight with another so that everyone can be seen to be ''appearing to'' be in support of popular causes, while actually legislating as they wish. The various [[black box voting]] exposes and my own election poll work have left me with the knowledge that we have a system that is fairly easy to rig, and even that some ''specific elections have been rigged'' (because the riggers made a mistake, resulting in evidence showing that the elections were rigged). I '''Support''' a global blackout, only if the blackout page encourages protest and direct action. Merely contacting Congresscritters is '''not''' the action it should push. Thanks to [[Citizens United]], even foreigners can funnel unlimited money into US elections. We need to [[Fix Congress First]] --[[User:Walks on Water|W☯W]] [[User talk:Walks on Water|t]]/[[Special:Contributions/Walks on Water|c]] 06:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

==== Pages once clicked-through ====
: ''Added since "click-through" seems to have traction.''
In the event that users can click through and read normal pages, shouldn't the border or background of our pages be changed (via css) for the day? This would mean that visibility (separate from the banner) is prominent on every page read. Examples might be, a black background where text is not affected, or a fainter font, perhaps a modified logo or a prominent "Protest SOPA" button under the logo. But something. - [[user:FT2|FT2]]
; Comment from WMF
This is not currently on the tech roadmap, and is not something we can allocate any resources to. If there's a community decision to do this, that's fine, if there are community resources to do it. But from the WMF side, I can not commit any resources to anything other than what we originally had on this page. [[User:Philippe (WMF)|Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation]] ([[User talk:Philippe (WMF)|talk]]) 23:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Support =====
# '''Support''' changing the borders, as a form of mourning or notice, and a reminder for people who were too busy to take action when they first saw the banner but just clicked through and went on with their tasks. --[[User_talk:Trödel|Trödel]] 15:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#: I added Support/Oppose sections here, and moved your response up from '''Comments''' since it explicitly states that it's a '''Support''' vote. I hope that's OK, my apologies otherwise. [[User:FeRD NYC|FeRD_NYC]] ([[User talk:FeRD NYC|talk]]) 18:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# Support a soft blackout, along with any nondestructive changes in the appearance of pages that will not cause layouts to be rearranged (ie., scrambled), aside from possibly moving the content up or down. [[User:Dratman|Dratman]] ([[User talk:Dratman|talk]]) 18:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. This is a good point, assuming a soft blackout. Human nature being what it is, a lot of readers will impatiently click through, then have a "wait a minute, what was that?" moment, so if we do this at all, we should really make it easier for people to understand. --[[User:Tryptofish|Tryptofish]] ([[User talk:Tryptofish|talk]]) 20:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''I like the idea of having something on the page for the day after you click though the blackout. [[User:Etineskid|Etineskid]][[User talk:Etineskid|(talk)]] 21:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Seems like a pretty simple site css change that the community could do, or maybe just swap out the background image (the book texture thing in monobook) with a tiled [stop sopa] text that would appear behind the page.--[[User:Gmaxwell|Gmaxwell]] ([[User talk:Gmaxwell|talk]]) 23:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' A border edit seems like a good way of keeping the sustained (but background) attention of a user throughout the particular day whilst not impacting on the usefulness of the encyclopedia. [[User:IRWolfie-|IRWolfie-]] ([[User talk:IRWolfie-|talk]]) 23:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#Even though this is admittedly a crappy "vote-only" post, '''Support''' --[[User:Dialh|Dial]] ([[User talk:Dialh|talk]]) 02:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Support, make the borders or keep the logo changed. Instead of having the picture of the wikipedia founder begging for money, it should be a large "stop sopa" warning that links to the main notice page. [[User:Luna Ariya|Luna Ariya]] ([[User talk:Luna Ariya|talk]]) 09:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. Support changing the borders, background image or logo (all of which should be pretty easy, given WMF did not anticipate this proposal, so resources are severely constrained). I would ''strongly'' oppose making the text fainter or messing with fonts — [[WP:ACCESS|accessibility]] (specifically colour contrast) should remain an important concern — [[:en:User:OwenBlacker|OwenBlacker]] ([[:en:User talk:OwenBlacker|Talk]]) 12:18, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong support''' Not only will it raise awareness for it, but it would be nice to see a makeover of Wikipedia for once. DARK WIKIPEDIA! XD --{{User-multi
|User=Imagine Wizard
|1=t
|2=c
|3=ct
|sup=
|doc=yes
}} [[Pig Latin|Iway amway Imagineway Izardway.]] 16:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support.''' [[User:Jamface1|Jamface1]] ([[User talk:Jamface1|talk]]) 17:27, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' yeah. this keeps the issue at the front. ... [[user:avriette|aa]]:[[user_talk:avriette|talk]] 00:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. As suggested above: borders not fonts. [[User:Markhurd|Mark Hurd]] ([[User talk:Markhurd|talk]]) 02:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Oppose =====
# (Soft) '''Oppose'''. While not strongly against this, I think the "blackout" page is a powerful gesture, even if click-through, and makes an unmistakable statement which should have a huge impact all on its own. Anything more than that is likely to be of greatly reduced value in terms of raising SOPA awareness (especially given much of the rest of the 'net will also be hammering that point home), and will probably serve only to antagonize — and possibly further alienate — those Wikipedians who are already uncomfortable with what we're discussing. [[User:FeRD NYC|FeRD_NYC]] ([[User talk:FeRD NYC|talk]]) 18:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Soft oppose''' of modified border, for the reasons that FeRD gave. '''Strong oppose''' of faint fonts, colored backgrounds, etc., for the same reasons and because it is inconsiderate toward those of us with visual impairments. [[User:Peter Chastain|Peter Chastain]] ([[User talk:Peter Chastain|talk]]) 21:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Oppose''' I'd support a faint modified border. However, nothing jarring. For the same reasons as Peter Chastain, I'd rather not be inconsiderate towards those with visual impairments. [[Special:Contributions/173.188.59.151|173.188.59.151]] ([[User talk:173.188.59.151|talk]]) 02:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strong oppose'''. Not only would this be inappropriate, it would also look terrible. Besides, caching would ruin any attempt anyway, and leave users with a mish-mash of different CSS for the following month. [[User:Modest Genius|Modest Genius]] [[User_talk:Modest Genius|talk]] 17:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' Without explanation of the layout, this might be a very confusing element. Consider the case of a public library, where the Computer/IP might have already 'clicked trough' and the next person might be thoroughly confused about the layout. If implemented, would require to be bound to a banner that is not dismissible. —[[User:TheDJ|TheDJ]] ([[User talk:TheDJ|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TheDJ|contribs]]) 20:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' per above comments by Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation. No point telling Wikimedia Foundation to do something that they don't have resources to do. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 05:25, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. just do blackout! [[User:Dtyger|Dtyger]] ([[User talk:Dtyger|talk]]) 07:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#[[User:Annabel|Annabel]] ([[User talk:Annabel|talk]]) 13:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. Far weaker than a blackout. [[User:Dkasak|Denis Kasak]] ([[User talk:Dkasak|talk]]) 15:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Comments =====
* I'm not entirely sure ''how'' I feel here. I'm all for a Wikipedia stance against SOPA, and for a visible show of support/solidarity with the greater movement across the Internet, especially on the January 18 action date. However, given that there are a significant number of Wikipedians who are uncomfortable with this action (as the body of responses on this page clearly indicates), I want to be respectful of their views as well. [[User:FeRD NYC|FeRD_NYC]] ([[User talk:FeRD NYC|talk]]) 18:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

==== Date of the action ====
One suggested date is January 18, 2012, which is the date around which the internet appears to be gelling for action. Other dates are possible. Do you support the January 18, 2012 date?

; Comment and explanation from WMF
I was asked why the 18th should be the date. The conventional thinking among those on the Hill who were following SOPA a week ago was that the mark-up hearing would be scheduled for the 18th. However, we should understand that, given how politicians have recently reacted to the converging opposition to the bill (as evidenced in the recent news articles and White House blog), we cannot guarantee that the hearing will take place on that date since all variables seem to be in flux. The recent political maneuvering and statements, as the foundation of SOPA cracks on the Hill, might suggest that politicians may seek to avoid embarrassment and schedule the hearings for a later date. This is a community decision, but we believe that the 18th still represents the date when the tech players will converge to protest this proposed legislation and that our participation on the 18th would be furthering important momentum against the legislation. I will ask that someone from our team post a list of known sites to the talk page. [[User:Philippe (WMF)|Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation]] ([[User talk:Philippe (WMF)|talk]]) 23:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Support =====

#'''Support''' My site's going down, too. Let's all go together. [[User:SLWatson|SLWatson]] ([[User talk:SLWatson|talk]]) 18:52, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Solidarity in the tech community is helpful for the cause. [[User:Hayesgm|Geoff]] ([[User talk:Hayesgm|talk]]) 23:22, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' '''[[User:Fluttershy|Flutter]][[User talk:Fluttershy|shy]]''' ''[[Tripcode|!xmcuvg2MH]]'' 18:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Per other websites. [[User:Phearson|Phearson]] ([[User talk:Phearson|talk]]) 15:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:Bulwersator|Bulwersator]] ([[User talk:Bulwersator|talk]]) 17:58, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# Support, to coincide with other sites protest action. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 18:00, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', best to time this with other sites' protests for the greatest impact. – [[User:Andrew Hampe|Andrew Hampe]] [[User talk:Andrew Hampe|Talk]] 18:21, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# Mass action is better than scattershot actions across the web. Multiple sites going down or taking this action together will have a greater impact on the general public. [[User:Tony Fox|Tony Fox]] [[User_talk:Tony Fox|(arf!)]] 18:29, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''[[User:Rschen7754|Rs]][[User talk:Rschen7754|chen]][[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|7754]]''' 18:32, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# Rapid action is critical, while we still have an opportunity to influence the bill. The 18th gives just adequate time to assess consensus; it is a happy coincidence that it also matches other sites. [[User:Dcoetzee|Dcoetzee]] 18:48, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:Mathias Schindler|Mathias Schindler]] ([[User talk:Mathias Schindler|talk]]) 18:49, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# This seems to be the date that has a rough consensus among other sites (e.g., Reddit will have a blackout that day).--[[User:Ragesoss|Ragesoss]] ([[User talk:Ragesoss|talk]]) 19:11, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''[[User:Cbrown1023|Cbrown1023]]''' '''[[User talk:Cbrown1023|talk]]''' 19:23, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# Support Jan 18th to coincide with other sides including reddit (and minecraft!). Later dates to coincide with specific congressional timeframes will be less effective. The idea is to both mobilize users and push the news cycle. Reddit and friends going black will get the tech press talking but they have been going on about SOPA for months. We want the regular press to take notice and for that we need a coordinated blackout. [[User:Protonk|Protonk]] ([[User talk:Protonk|talk]]) 19:34, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# Whatever date makes the most sense for coordinated action, but 24 hours should be the maximum if we do a blackout. --[[User:Michael Snow|Michael Snow]] ([[User talk:Michael Snow|talk]]) 19:52, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#We need to show solidarity with Reddit and other protesting websites and businesses. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] ([[User talk:Michaeldsuarez|talk]]) 19:59, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# Yes. Best time. -- [[User:Andreas Werle|Andreas Werle]] ([[User talk:Andreas Werle|talk]]) 20:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# Agree to January 18t. Coinciding with date of other blackouts will increase the overall profile of the action. [[User:Ironlion45|Ironlion45]] ([[User talk:Ironlion45|talk]]) 07:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' Jan 18. [[User:SarahStierch|SarahStierch]] ([[User talk:SarahStierch|talk]]) 20:04, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:Maplebed|Maplebed]] ([[User talk:Maplebed|talk]]) 20:05, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:LoriLee|LoriLee]] ([[User talk:LoriLee|talk]]) 20:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# Support. --[[User:Teukros|Teukros]] ([[User talk:Teukros|talk]]) 20:09, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# Support. Sends a message of massive opposition to the bill on the day when experts from the internet/tech community will be testifying to Congress. Amplifies the actions of other websites such as Reddit. Early enough to impact the language of a bill well before an undesirable version comes to a vote. [[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]] [[User talk:Ocaasi|t ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Ocaasi| c]] 20:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# I support this date, if WMF deems it the most effective (because of the Reddit blackout). But I think the WMF should be empowered to change the date if events on the ground change suddenly. We might need to move quickly in such a case. [[User:First Light|First Light]] ([[User talk:First Light|talk]]) 20:36, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Liberaler Humanist|Liberaler Humanist]] ([[User talk:Liberaler Humanist|talk]]) 20:41, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Thparkth|Thparkth]] ([[User_Talk:Thparkth|talk]]) 20:45, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Vituzzu|Vituzzu]] ([[User talk:Vituzzu|talk]]) 21:15, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# I would prefer that it runs 17th-19th, because [http://www.occupyyourcongress.info/ Occupy Congress] starts on the 17th. [[User:Selery|Selery]] ([[User talk:Selery|talk]]) 21:28, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' I support this date if other sites who may join are also on board with it. Many internet giants have voiced potential support. Now I don't know how much we can rely on Facebook, Google/youtube, Amazon, Ebay and the such to follow though. However sites like Reddit, Tumblr, Imagur, Photobucket, ect I assume would gladly go along, so a consensus with their leaders should at least try to be reached. [[User:TheMadcapSyd|TheMadcapSyd]] ([[User talk:TheMadcapSyd|talk]]) 21:45, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', but I think banners should be used leading up to the blackout to try and initiate action prior. The 18th may be too little time to achieve the end result of "kicking people into action" otherwise. [[User:Veled|Veled]] ([[User talk:Veled|talk]]) 21:51, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:JohnCD|JohnCD]] ([[User talk:JohnCD|talk]]) 22:03, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# --[[User:Jesant13|Jesant13]] ([[User talk:Jesant13|talk]]) 22:05, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' This is the day a lot of sites are doing things as well, so if we're going to act we should do it then. The internet should rally against this in unison, it will make us much stronger. {{spa|DfizzleShizzle}}
# '''Support'''. [[User:Zenimpulse|Zenimpulse]] ([[User talk:Zenimpulse|talk]]) 23:51, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' blacking out multiple sites at once has a greater effect --[[User:Jon889|Jon889]] ([[User talk:Jon889|talk]]) 23:58, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' Solidarity w/ other sites will make for greater impact.--[[User:JayJasper|JayJasper]] ([[User talk:JayJasper|talk]]) 00:16, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:Jfeise|jfeise]] ([[User talk:Jfeise|talk]]) 00:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' Sooner is better. --[[User:DrCruse|DrCruse]] ([[User talk:DrCruse|talk]]) 00:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' Blacking out at the same time will have a more profound effect. --[[User:Schwern|Schwern]] ([[User talk:Schwern|talk]]) 00:50, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' the coordinated date. - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 00:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:Seb az86556|Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556]] [[User_talk:Seb_az86556|> haneʼ]] 00:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', [[User:Ziko|Ziko]] ([[User talk:Ziko|talk]]) 00:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', [[User:Jed 20012|Captain Gamma]] ([[User talk:Jed 20012|talk]]) 01:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User talk:Sarah|Sarah]] 01:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:Orashmatash|Orashmatash]] ([[User talk:Orashmatash|talk]]) 01:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''', [[User:Robin klein|Robin klein]] ([[User talk:Robin klein|talk]]) 01:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' We're strong, and our project is important, but the internet community is stronger together [[User:Gmaxwell|Gmaxwell]] ([[User talk:Gmaxwell|talk]]) 01:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' for a coordinated endeavor (18 January 13:00 UTC to 19 January 01:00 UTC), though if the Foundation finds another date would be more effective, that should be done. Banners can (and probably should) last a bit longer than the blackout. --[[User:Tim Parenti|Tim Parenti]] ([[User talk:Tim Parenti|talk]]) 02:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Nascar8FanGA|Nascar8FanGA]] ([[User talk:Nascar8FanGA|talk]]) 02:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' ~[[User:Feedintm|Feedintm]][[User talk:Feedintm|Parley]] 02:25, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' January 18 seems like a good, strategic date to get the most attention for this. --[[User:Hyper Anthony|Hyper Anthony]] ([[User talk:Hyper Anthony|talk]]) 02:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Dkonstantinos|dkonstantinos]] ([[User talk:Dkonstantinos|talk]]) 02:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Revelian|Revelian]] ([[User talk:Revelian|talk]]) 02:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' A coordinated effort is the best shot we have at this raising awareness. -[[User:Anabus|anabus]] [[User_talk:Anabus|(Talk to me)]] 03:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:KevinCuddeback|KevinCuddeback]] ([[User talk:KevinCuddeback|talk]]) 03:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Haha169|haha169]] ([[User talk:Haha169|talk]]) 03:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:TNLNYC|TNL]] ([[User talk:TNLNYC|talk]]) 03:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' The total blackout will send the strongest message to the public. The date of the 18th is best because it demonstrates a unified front from the internet activist groups. Other groups will be going down on this date. (edit) [[User:P4lm0r3|P4lm0r3]] ([[User talk:P4lm0r3|talk]]) 08:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Sounds like an appropriate day, but it's rather soon considering that we are just now discussing this. Hopefully Wikimedia can get everything in place by that date without any major issues. Still, if you're right it will be very well timed. [[User:Jessemv|Jessemv]] ([[User talk:Jessemv|talk]]) 03:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' for at least the first stage of action. Here's hoping it will also be the last. [[User:Seraphimblade|Seraphimblade]] [[User talk:Seraphimblade|Talk to me]] 03:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:TotientDragooned|TotientDragooned]] ([[User talk:TotientDragooned|talk]]) 04:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:sontuk96|sontuk96]] [[User:Sontuk96|Sontuk96]] ([[User talk:Sontuk96|talk]]) 04:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Twistie.man|Twistie.man]] ([[User talk:Twistie.man|talk]]) 04:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Same hours as Reddit and the Cheezeburger network. A unified effort among many websites has more impact. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 04:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Farlo|Farlo]] ([[User talk:Farlo|talk]]) 04:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', first choice. [[User:byelf2007|byelf2007]] ([[User talk:byelf2007|talk]]) around 4:45 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Steevithak|Steevithak]] ([[User talk:Steevithak|talk]]) 05:04, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' There's no way we can agree on another date in this forum. It's best to follow reddit's date. [[User:Froth|.froth.]] ([[User talk:Froth|talk]]) 05:36, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#—[[User talk:WFCforLife|WFC]]— 05:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' All websites participating in the strike need to all stick with the same date, making it hit hard for browsers [[User:activeradio|activeradio]] ([[User talk:activeradio|talk]]) 04:32, 14 January 2012 (UTC) 05:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' '''[[User:UpstateNYer|upstate]][[User talk:UpstateNYer|NYer]]''' 06:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Most effective when coordinated with other efforts. '''[[User:Falcon8765|Falcon8765]]''' [[User talk:Falcon8765|(TALK)]] 06:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#--[[User:Guerillero|Guerillero]] | [[User_talk:Guerillero|My Talk]] 06:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- [[User:Snackshack100|Snackshack100]] ([[User talk:Snackshack100|talk]]) 06:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC) - Jan. 18th
#'''Support''' --[[User:Tgeairn|Tgeairn]] ([[User talk:Tgeairn|talk]]) 06:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Monowi|Monowi]] ([[User talk:Monowi|talk]]) 07:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Sonicsuns|Sonicsuns]] ([[User talk:Sonicsuns|talk]]) 07:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''support''' for maximum impact. [[User talk:Sonia|sonia]]♫ 07:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#[[User:CharlieEchoTango|CharlieEchoTango]] ([[User talk:CharlieEchoTango#top|contact]]) 07:58, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Cybercobra|Cybercobra]] [[User talk:Cybercobra|(talk)]] 08:18, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:Seewolf|Seewolf]] ([[User talk:Seewolf|talk]]) 08:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - to better build solidarity, which seems to increase effectiveness of action. [[User:Dkreisst|Dkreisst]] ([[User talk:Dkreisst|talk]]) 08:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:Vorziblix|Vorziblix]] ([[User talk:Vorziblix|talk]]) 09:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' [[User:ZiltoidTheOmnicient|Commander Ziltoid]] ([[User talk:ZiltoidTheOmnicient|speak]]) 09:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' The 18th of January in solidarity with other sites. It will be more powerful if internet users encounter SOPA blackouts multiple times on the same day.
# '''Support''' Solidarity has greater impact. Of course, I would also support further action if the legislation progresses. [[User:Kainosnous|Kainosnous]] ([[User talk:Kainosnous|talk]]) 09:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' We take a stand ''with'' the rest of the Internet community, or not at all. (Not to say the action can't extend beyond the 18th, in either direction — but that date should be the focus.) Fracturing the opposition in any way does more harm than good. [[User:FeRD NYC|FeRD_NYC]] ([[User talk:FeRD NYC|talk]]) 10:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - In line with other sites for maximum impact. [[User:CT Cooper|CT Cooper]] · [[User talk:CT Cooper|talk]] 12:13, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Sławomir Biały|Sławomir Biały]] ([[User talk:Sławomir Biały|talk]]) 12:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Stand with Reddit! [[Special:Contributions/109.150.245.44|109.150.245.44]] ([[User talk:109.150.245.44|talk]]) 12:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#~ [[User:Bioran23|'''BIORAN23''']] - [[User talk:Bioran23|'''Talk''']]
#:<s>'''Support'''. ~ [[User:Ningauble|Ningauble]] ([[User talk:Ningauble|talk]]) 14:06, 14 January 2012 (UTC)</s>
#:I am advised by a 'bot, acting on behalf of a consensus of administrators, that my responses to this RfC are inapplicable or unclear. Whereas my response to the above captioned proposition represents my best effort to communicate my position on that specific proposition, and whereas it has been deemed unacceptable, I am therefore striking it and withdrawing from this RfC. ~ [[User:Ningauble|Ningauble]] ([[User talk:Ningauble|talk]]) 23:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support and Follow Reddit''' - Don't miss a golden opportunity to bring about the highest possible impact, given this is really happening Internet-wide. [[User:Stevietheman|'''Stevie is the man!''']] [[User talk:Stevietheman|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Stevietheman|Work]] 15:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' assuming the technical issues can be resolved by then --[[User_talk:Trödel|Trödel]] 15:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The most effective date. [[User:AndyTheGrump|AndyTheGrump]] ([[User talk:AndyTheGrump|talk]]) 15:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' For a stronger message. [[User:Albacore|Albacore]] ([[User talk:Albacore|talk]]) 15:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' This would be essential in allowing everyone to understand about SOPA and PIPA.
#'''Support''' '''[[User:Jujutacular|Jujutacular]]''' [[User talk:Jujutacular|talk]] 16:55, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Carlsmith|Carlsmith]] ([[User talk:Carlsmith|talk]]) 16:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Absolutely. Solidarity!
#'''Support''' The other geeks are counting on Wikipedia to help make a HUGE statement. 11:23am US Central Time (Nebraska)
# '''Support''' - Symbolic protests work because they concentrate public attention on an issue. This implies a unified moment of newsworthiness — something the anarcholiberals of Occupy ''[YOUR TOWN HERE]'' never grasped. [[User:Carrite|Carrite]] ([[User talk:Carrite|talk]]) 17:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' --[[User:Voyager|Voyager]] ([[User talk:Voyager|talk]]) 17:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC) Coordination is the key to success.
#'''Support''' [[user:killemall22|killemall22]] ([[User talk:killemall22|talk]])
# '''Support''' – It would be more symbolic on that date than any other. — <tt>[[User talk:Madman|madman]]</tt> 18:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - [[User:Taketa|Taketa]] ([[User talk:Taketa|talk]]) 19:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' - [[User:Okeekobee|Okeekobee]] ([[User talk:Okeekobee|talk]]) 19:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' January 18th this the best day because it coincides with other blackouts. Imagine what it would be like to go to your computer to open Wikipedia, but it is down. Then you go to Reddit, but that is also down. Then you go to any Cheezburger site like FailBlog or Memebase, but they are down. [[User:Drivec|Drivec]] ([[User talk:Drivec|talk]]) 20:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 20:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' The sooner, the better. But... Why just 24h? I don't use wikipedia every day. I would feel okay with going on blackout for a week. [[User:Jurjenb|Jurjenb]] ([[User talk:Jurjenb|talk]]) 20:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', provided that the other sites continue to use January 18th as well. [[User:Ojchase|Ojchase]] ([[User talk:Ojchase|talk]]) 21:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', I support the date, but to really make an impact, a long-term black should be considered. Perhaps the Week of the 18th, or until the 1st of February would really hit home how bad things would be with SOPA/PIPA. [[User:TEG24601|TEG]] ([[User talk:TEG24601|talk]]) 21:18, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I agree with this date. [[User:Etineskid|Etineskid]][[User talk:Etineskid|(talk)]] 21:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' By using the same date as other sites, we can maximize our impact. [[User:Peter Chastain|Peter Chastain]] ([[User talk:Peter Chastain|talk]]) 21:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Everyone else is doing it on that date [[User:Estemshorn|eSTeMSHORN]] ([[User_Talk:Estemshorn|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Estemshorn|C]]) 22:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Logical date choice. [[User:Pinkmango00|-SharonT]] ([[User talk:Pinkmango00|talk]]) 22:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - Coinciding with other blackouts seems like the best thing to do, to further show the effect that SOPA may bring. - [[User:SudoGhost|Sudo]][[User_talk:SudoGhost#top|Ghost]] 00:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' If the entire net does this at the same time, there will be a CLEAR message to the population at large. [[User:Fieari|Fieari]] ([[User talk:Fieari|talk]]) 01:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Solidarity is best. Whatever date the other websites blackout would be the best, but if that doesn't work, whatever date the hearing occurs, would be my second choice [[Special:Contributions/173.188.59.151|173.188.59.151]] ([[User talk:173.188.59.151|talk]]) 02:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Supporting January 18th as a date of solidarity and unison with a ''full'' blackout starting January 18 at 00:00 +14 and ending January 19 at 00:00 -13 (so every time zone experiences it for a full period rather than it ending, for example, at 1900 -0500 GMT because of Wikipedia's default time settings). I also support an extended Blackout if necessary. [[User:Evilgohan2|ⒺⓋⒾⓁⒼⓄⒽⒶⓃ]][[User talk:Evilgohan2|②]] 03:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', considering a crapton of other sites are doing it on the 18th. [[User:Lonewolf9196|Lonewolf9196]] ([[User talk:Lonewolf9196|talk]]) 04:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Jkvannort|jkv]] ([[User talk:Jkvannort|talk]]) 04:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Besides solidarity with the tech community, this would give readers a clear date that they would be without Wikipedia. Since Wikipedia is such an important resource, giving users some specific notice would be ideal. [[User:Kiwi128|Kiwi128]] ([[User talk:Kiwi128|talk]]) 08:33, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Jan 18th --[[User:Juusohe|Juusohe]] ([[User talk:Juusohe|talk]]) 08:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|Juusohe}}
#'''Support''' --[[User:La Corona|La Corona]] ([[User talk:La Corona|talk]]) 08:54, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:TheCatalyst31|TheCatalyst31]] [[User talk:TheCatalyst31|Reaction]]•[[Special:Contributions/TheCatalyst31|Creation]] 09:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Jane023|Jane]] ([[User talk:Jane023|talk]]) 09:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Keep the momentum going [[User:AndrewKemendo|Andrew]] ([[User talk:AndrewKemendo|talk]]) 09:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Use the same date as other sites, maximise the effect the protest will have on all of the people that depend on information [[User:Luna Ariya|Luna Ariya]] ([[User talk:Luna Ariya|talk]]) 09:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' A day of global actions by all the open-source web --[[User:Barbaking|Barbaking]] [[user talk:Barbaking|(talk)]] 10:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Xjmos|Xjmos]] ([[User talk:Xjmos|talk]]) 10:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Rakeshdhere|R.D>]] ([[User talk:Rakeshdhere|talk]]) 11:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. As an English Wikipedia user living outside of the United States, I support this blackout. [[User:Chocohall|R.D>]] ([[User talk:Chocohall|talk]]) 7:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:Blogotron|Blogotron]] ([[User talk:Blogotron|talk]]) 11:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' The date is fine. The hours don't seem to be clearly defined, though: which time zone is being used? Try to coordinate the time zone with the other protesters, or block it down while it is 18 January 2012 anywhere in the United States. --[[User:Stefan2|Stefan2]] ([[User talk:Stefan2|talk]]) 11:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support''' Coordinating with other sites that are taking a stand is really important, and increases the news hook across a wider range of media segments. — [[:en:User:OwenBlacker|OwenBlacker]] ([[:en:User talk:OwenBlacker|Talk]]) 12:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Oneiros|Oneiros]] ([[User talk:Oneiros|talk]]) 12:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:FoeNyx|FoeNyx]] ([[User talk:FoeNyx|talk]]) 12:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Support'''. [[User:Axl|'''Axl''']] ¤ [[User talk:Axl|[Talk]]] 13:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Andrewmc123|<big>Andrewmc</big>]][[User talk:Andrewmc123|123]] 13:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. The message is stronger if coordinated with others. [[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] - [[:m:WiR/OS|WiR/OS]] ([[User talk:Daniel Mietchen|talk]]) 13:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Use the same date as other big sites, like Reddit, which is January 18, 8AM to 8PM EST (Eastern USA). http://blog.reddit.com/2012/01/stopped-they-must-be-on-this-all.html • [[User:Sbmeirow|Sbmeirow]] • [[User talk:Sbmeirow|Talk]] • 14:06, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' strength in numbers. [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 14:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support conditionally'''. If indeed other technical sites protest on the 18th, we should join them. If the hearings change, and so does the date of other protests, well, it depends on who and how many. --[[User:Quintucket|Quintucket]] ([[User talk:Quintucket|talk]]) 14:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. '''[[User:Jcaraballo|Jca]][[User Talk:Jcaraballo|raballo]]''' 14:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:Ohconfucius|Ohconfucius]] [[User talk:Ohconfucius|¡digame!]] 15:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' This won't just affect Wikipedia. We can't stand apart. [[User:Eshade|Eshade]] ([[User talk:Eshade|talk]]) 15:57, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' As someone already said: "best to time this with other sites' protests for the greatest impact".Ne0Freedom 16:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]''' [[User talk:Salvio giuliano| Let's talk about it!]] 16:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. ... [[User:discospinster|'''disco''''''''spinster''''']] [[User talk:discospinster|'''talk''']] 16:30, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I think it should be at the same time other major sites do this, so 18th is a good idea imho --[[User:Mirrakor|Mirrakor]] ([[User talk:Mirrakor|talk]]) 16:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Let's stick with others, and if needed, we can always do it again later :) --[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus| talk to me]] 16:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:Krischan111|Krischan111]] ([[User talk:Krischan111|talk]]) 17:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:SethAllen623|Seth Allen]] ([[User talk:SethAllen623|discussion]]/[[Special:Contribs/SethAllen623|contributions]]) 16:55, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. --[[User:Konero26|Konero26]] ([[User talk:Konero26|talk]]) 18:34, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Concerted action is better than scattershot. [[User:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|Short Brigade Harvester Boris]] ([[User talk:Short Brigade Harvester Boris|talk]]) 18:46, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', Use the consensus date, January 18, 8AM to 8PM EST (Eastern USA) --[[User:HectorMoffet|HectorMoffet]] ([[User talk:HectorMoffet|talk]]) 19:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support.''' Of course there will be negative effects. Those negatives pale in comparison to the chilling effect of this legislation. [[User:Tide rolls|'''Tide''']][[User talk:Tide rolls|'''rolls''']] 19:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - [[User:CTZMSC3|ctzmsc3]]|[[User talk:CTZMSC3|talk]] 20:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:Tino 032|Tino 032]] ([[User talk:Tino 032|talk]]) 20:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' solidarity with other sites shutting down on the 18th. [[User:Gobonobo|Gobonobo]] [[User_talk:Gobonobo|T]] [[Special:Contributions/Gobonobo|C]] 20:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' solidarity is the best approach here. —[[User:TheDJ|TheDJ]] ([[User talk:TheDJ|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/TheDJ|contribs]]) 20:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' solidarity, per others. -[[User:GTBacchus|GTBacchus]]([[User talk:GTBacchus|talk]]) 21:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:pratstercs|Pratstercs]][[User_talk:pratstercs|Talk to me]] 21:13, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' My site's going down, too. Let's all go together. [[computerkidt]] 21:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''.Is a good date. [[User:Elberth 00001939|Elberth 00001939]] ([[User talk:Elberth 00001939|talk]]) 21:37, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' --[[User:BohemianRhapsody|BohemianRhapsody]] ([[User talk:BohemianRhapsody|talk]]) 22:25, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Go big or go home. Jan 18 is a fine day to act.
#'''Support'''. [[User:CristoperB|CristoperB]] ([[User talk:CristoperB|talk]]) 22:51, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Nubzor|Nubzor]] ([[User talk:Nubzor|talk]]) 23:20, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Support Global downtime in unison with other major sites; reddit is set for January 18, 8AM to 8PM EST. The impact will be most powerful with multi-site collaboration. [[User:Cr1632|Cr1632]] ([[User talk:Cr1632|talk]]){{spa|Cr1632}}
#'''Support''' Create the greatest impact. [[User:Spaceshuttlediscovery|Spaceshuttlediscovery]] ([[User talk:Spaceshuttlediscovery|talk]]) 01:11, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Ltr,ftw|Ltr,ftw]] ([[User talk:Ltr,ftw|talk]]) 01:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. It's going to be MUCH more effective when multiple websites/ companies shut down at the same time. [[User:SRWikis|SRWikis]] ([[User talk:SRWikis|talk]]) 03:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' big and small websites are going down on this date. Only makes sense to join them then. ''[[User:Swarm|Swarm]]'' [[User talk:Swarm|X]] 03:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#Solidarity FTW! [[User:Master&Expert|'''Master&'''Expert]] ([[User talk:Master&Expert|Talk]]) 03:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:HereToHelp|HereToHelp]] ([[User talk:HereToHelp|''talk to me'']]) 01:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' [[User:Starship.paint|Starship.paint]] ([[User talk:Starship.paint|talk]]) 02:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Always someone wanting to put limits on someone else. Enough is enough! [[User:Ramapoughnative|Ramapoughnative]] ([[User talk:Ramapoughnative|talk]]) 02:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' -- going down on this date will have a HUGE impact, since many other sites are going down too (: — Preceding ''signed'' comment added by [[User:Cymru.lass|Cymru.lass]] ([[User talk:Cymru.lass|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cymru.lass|contribs]]) 04:14, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Sounds good to me. [[User:Suriel1981|ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹]][[User talk:Suriel1981|Speak]] 06:12, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' A unified front seems best to me. [[User:Quinling|Harlequin]] ([[User talk:Quinling|talk]]) 06:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Staging the blackout on the same day as fellow high-volume site Reddit will certainly multiply the protest's effectiveness. I only hope more interested parties (e.g. Facebook, Yahoo) will sign on in time. --[[User:Foolishgrunt|Foolishgrunt]] ([[User talk:Foolishgrunt|talk]]) 07:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Dtyger|Dtyger]] ([[User talk:Dtyger|talk]]) 07:35, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:SteveStrummer|SteveStrummer]] ([[User talk:SteveStrummer|talk]]) 07:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:L33tCh|L33tCh]] ([[User talk:L33tCh|talk]]) 08:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#Any date is fine. Coordination with the other major sites is better than doing it independently on a different date. In this spirit I support the 18th as I support any other date. [[User:Hans Adler|Hans]] [[User talk:Hans Adler|Adler]] 08:58, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. A coordinated blackout with other popular websites will have the maximum impact. Although I think we should also have a one or two more blackout days to act as a reminder. Possibly the initial one is a full blackout, the others only soft blackouts. Maybe a banner up for a week- we should remind users, one way or an other. --[[User:Lerikson|Lerikson]] ([[User talk:Lerikson|talk]]) 09:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:MarlinMr|MarlinMr]] ([[User talk:MarlinMr|talk]]) 09:15, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:Dimtsit|Dimtsit]] ([[User talk:Dimtsit|talk]]) 11:36, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. [[User:PoizonMyst|PoizonMyst]] ([[User talk:PoizonMyst|talk]]) 14:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
# Yep. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 14:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support.''' Everyone should go down together for strength of impact. The date is already chosen and there's no reason to change it. [[User:Dkasak|Denis Kasak]] ([[User talk:Dkasak|talk]]) 15:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''' match other sites for maximum impact. --[[User talk:SarekOfVulcan|SarekOfVulcan (talk)]] 17:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Oppose =====
# The long-term political safety of Wikipedia could be endangered. Consider the (admittedly imperfect) analogy with U.S. public radio, whose effectiveness as an information medium was severely impacted, beginning in the 1980s, by politicians seeking revenge against an organization perceived to oppose certain policies and viewpoints. I am strongly in favor of protest against these terrible bills by individuals and by other organizations which are not constrained to provide a [[neutral point of view]]. I am also mindful of the successful policy of political non-involvement adhered to for many decades by Alcoholics Anonymous and related groups, which, like Wikipedia, are non-hierarchical, as a key organizational principal, not because of some theoretical or ideological concept, but because the task of the organization cannot be effectively performed in a top-directed manner. I may be wrong, and I do not take a dogmatic or unyielding position on this question, but I beg those participating in this decision to consider the risk versus the reward. Wikipedia is a global project, which cannot be thwarted by any one country, but its operation could be impeded within one country's borders. Since political advocacy is not the purpose of Wikipedia, why should it become an advocate? [[User:Dratman|Dratman]] ([[User talk:Dratman|talk]]) 02:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#*Public radio's vulnerability is that it was (and is) very strongly funded by the government (and still is today via the CPB). Wikimedia is not, and avoiding the risk of that kind of influence has been a long term component in the fundraising strategy.
#*:That is why I pointed out in my original comment that the analogy was imperfect. It was exactly that, an analogy. Your argument shows that Wikipedia is less vulnerable than NPR. However, political foes do not necessarily restrict themselves to de-funding. They might try to pull the nonprofit status.
#*::We're immune to political pressure-- our nonprofit status isn't going anywhere. If SOPA passes, we'll have to pull servers out of the US anyway (or worse)-- we owe it to our lawmakers to help them understand the gravity of this threat. --[[User:HectorMoffet|HectorMoffet]] ([[User talk:HectorMoffet|talk]]) 19:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#*Wikipedia is global— but today US law is uniquely compatible with our mission. For example, we would have to be a very different project in the UK (unflattering statements reliably produce successful libel litigation, no protection for ISPs in that area), in Canada and much of Europe (well meaning but poorly constructed anti-hate speech laws prevent writing factually about some opinions). In past analysis, nowhere came as close as the US in terms of public policy that promotes our mission, and we have a large number of common allies here who depend on the same protections under the law. A reduction of those freedoms would not kill Wikipedia, but they would be terrible indeed. Moreover, Wikipedia depends on other sites all over the world having the freedom to publish in order to use those sites as citations. Wikipedia cites Wikileaks in over 1000 articles. If it became unlawful to do so that would terribly degrade the projects, or even if we moved to avoid the law and simply a large portion of our readers/editors lost access to the citations.
#*:Your paragraph above seems to support my contention that U.S. political interference is a serious potential threat. Possibly I was not clear. I mean to say that, although the U.S. doesn't control everything, nevertheless any sanctions imposed by the U.S. government could be potentially very disruptive, and therefore the organization should refrain from provoking certain elements in the government who can be vengeful without regard for the consequences of their demagoguery.
#*Your argument with respect to [[WP:NPOV]] was countered quite thoroughly on Jimmy's talk page discussions: Yes we use NPOV to write our articles, but Wikipedia itself, the idea of people having free access to knowledge of all kinds which is assembled by the same people without officially appointed curators, is a very radial and non-neutral thing. The very idea of NPOV as a goal and golden standard is itself quite radical and more or less incompatible with the ideologies strongly held by many millions of people. This project exists because of many strong principles, strong principles which we must stand up for if the project is to survive. This fact is not diminished in the slightest by our equally strong belief that we should put those principles aside when we write and edit the project's articles. --[[User:Gmaxwell|Gmaxwell]] ([[User talk:Gmaxwell|talk]]) 06:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#*:My use of the term NPOV was intended to be suggestive. I understand that Wikimedia's public positions and actions are not bound by that principal. Preceding unsigned comment was left by [[User:Dratman|Dratman]] ([[User talk:Dratman|talk]]) 
#*:The distinction between articles and a Wikipedia official position, expressed on interstitial pages and banners, will be lost on many, perhaps most, readers. Moreover, if the blackout page links to other pages, will those be articles or more editorial pages? Jimbo can make public statements and highly visible appearances before congress. Wikipedia can tell us how to contact our representatives, but for it to tell us what we should say to them is a violation of NPOV. Let all of the pages linked by the blackout screen be educational, with NPOV analysis of how SOPA will affect Wikipedia. [[User:Peter Chastain|Peter Chastain]] ([[User talk:Peter Chastain|talk]]) 22:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#*Additionally, public radio took stands on things that were unrelated to public radio. Taking a stand on an issue that relates directly to wikipedia's continued existence is much different --[[User_talk:Trödel|Trödel]] 19:56, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# ..[[User:Youreallycan | '''Youreallycan''']] 17:55, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# No point in demonstrating during the bill mark-up. It should be done before the date if at all. [[User:Kansan|Kansan]] ([[User talk:Kansan|talk]]) 17:57, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
#:I believe the mark-up has been postponed til after the 18th now. [[User:Kaldari|Kaldari]] ([[User talk:Kaldari|talk]]) 05:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 18:19, 13 January 2012 (UTC) as above. This action is contrary to rational self-interest of WMF and Wikipedia
# I consider 2 days of discussion too little to make a decision of this significance. Most of the other discussion has been fairly fragmented and also mostly of a general nature, and not always well advertised and it seems clear interest died down for a while so I don't think we can read any clear consensus from any older dicussion. (BTW I've been monitoring this discussion on and off. While I never actually mentioned it, I've always felt anyone developing a concrete plan should allow at least 1 month from first proposal to planned implementation.) [[User:Nil Einne|Nil Einne]] ([[User talk:Nil Einne|talk]]) 18:22, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# [[User:Radiokid1010|Radiokid1010]] ([[User talk:Radiokid1010|talk]]) 18:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''''Strongly Oppose ''''' [[User:Lovibond|Lovibond]] ([[User talk:Lovibond|talk]]) 03:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Oppose''' I think it could have negatively repercussions for reasons already stated in above vote. [[User:Mugginsx|Mugginsx]] ([[User talk:Mugginsx|talk]]) 09:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#Per [[User:Nil Einne|Nil Einne]]. [[User:Lagrange613|Lagrange]][[User talk:Lagrange613#top|613]] 17:37, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Oppose''' As an operator of a Web site that legally provides copyrighted content, I have been quite eager to research SOPA and PIPA. There is little more than hysterical hype coming from the anti-SOPA camp and Wikipedia shouldn't get swept up into it. The Obama Administration has come out against [https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petition-tool/response/combating-online-piracy-while-protecting-open-and-innovative-internet against SOPA and PIPA] for rational reasons and if Wikipedia wants to act rationally themselves they will adopt the Administration's stance on the issue, rather than succumb to the hysterical mob filling this page. Besides, Wikipedia would be violating its NPOV policy if it openly advocated a political cause on its site. [[User:DJProFusion|DJProFusion]] ([[User talk:DJProFusion|talk]]) 18:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
# '''Oppose''' We should not get involved in political action, and stick to NPOV. Teun Spaans ([[User_talk:TeunSpaans|talk]]) 19:03, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Very Strong Oppose''' WP Should not be used for political activism, if it does it should lose it's non-profit status. [[User:Arzel|Arzel]] ([[User talk:Arzel|talk]]) 23:28, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#*Not true - [http://www.asaecenter.org/Resources/whitepaperdetail.cfm?ItemNumber=12202 see here], for example. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality]][[User talk:Neutrality|talk]] 03:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#*Not acting could lead to the end of an impartial Wikipedia, which is far worse then a non-profit status (although I wonder how this status can be lost, worst-case scenario is that tax-cut slips cannot be given anymore). [[User:Jurjenb|Jurjenb]] ([[User talk:Jurjenb|talk]]) 13:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Strongly Oppose''' - Wikipedia has not and should not participate in the game of politics. '''[[WP:NOTADVOCATE]]''' and '''[[WP:DISRUPTPOINT]]'''. While I do feel SOPA is an absolutely horrible idea that will be of little benefit, by getting involved we only hurt ourselves. There is little to gain through any participation across the Wikimedia projects. If anything, it will only hurt the users of Wikipedia while having little to no impact on the decision making in regards to SOPA. [[User:Slazenger|'''--Slazenger''']] ([[User talk:Slazenger|Contact Me]]) 04:02, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Intelligently oppose''' - Wikipedians have to deal with political games, especially if they are not in their interest. But the English Wikipedia is neither African, British, Irish, Canadian, or Indian in what sense however, and certainly not US (for political reasons, of course, not because I am denying the participation of US-Americans)!!! We have to protect the interest of all authors here, and I suggest that wikipedia has to work out its own copyright and censorship policy with prudence and not in haste ([[#How_to_protect_wikipedia_against_copyright_policies_and_censorship|see my suggestion below]]).[[User:Platonykiss|Platonykiss]] ([[User talk:Platonykiss|talk]]) 15:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#*You might want to read [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Action#Info_for_those_who_think_US_policies_don.27t_have_an_effect_on_other_countries Info for those who think US policies don't have an effect on other countries] before making so-called "intelligent" statements.
# '''Strong oppose'''. There doesn't seem to be any compelling reason to protest on this particular date, rather than the (far more relevant) date of the vote, or (even better) the day the law comes into affect (if it's even passed). [[User:Modest Genius|Modest Genius]] [[User_talk:Modest Genius|talk]] 17:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#* The timing is to coincide with other sites doing the same thing at the same time. Coordination will help the media realize the size of the threat. Waiting until after it passes will be waiting too late-- the earlier we protest, the easier it will be to dissuade congress from supporting this. --[[User:HectorMoffet|HectorMoffet]] ([[User talk:HectorMoffet|talk]]) 19:32, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#* Also, protesting something after it comes into effect or at around the same time is pretty backwards logic. The point of petitions, protests, ect is to stop something terrible from happening in the first place. If it does happen, then you keep on protesting it.[[User:TheMadcapSyd|TheMadcapSyd]] ([[User talk:TheMadcapSyd|talk]])
#* That would be like... Waiting sure your house is completely burned down before calling the firefighters. We need to act while we can still try to change the outcome! [[User:Jurjenb|Jurjenb]] ([[User talk:Jurjenb|talk]]) 13:37, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Comments =====
* I assume by "day" we mean 00:01 EST to 23:59 HAST? [[User:Jdforrester|James F.]] [[User talk:Jdforrester|(talk)]] 18:53, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
::By day, they mean from 12:00am Wednesday to 12:00am Thursday Eastern Standard Time. --[[User:Radiokid1010|Radiokid1010]] ([[User talk:Radiokid1010|talk]]) 05:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
::Which is perfectly fine. --[[User:Konero26|Konero26]] ([[User talk:Konero26|talk]]) 18:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
:::Nope. All the other sites are going down on January 18th from 8am–8pm EST (1300–0100 UTC). --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 05:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
::::Wikipedia is not like all the other sites. Wikipedia is a massive, worldwide source of information. Shutting it down for a short period of time-that would only affect readers in a limited range of timezones-is not the way to go. A full, global, 24-hour blackout is. --[[User:Stealthysis|Stealthy]] ([[User talk:Stealthysis|talk]]) 10:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

==== Other comments ====

* ''"The Wikimedia Foundation would develop technology necessary to implement this."'' - And you've studied how this demand would affect their tax status, I'm sure. [[User:Carrite|Carrite]] ([[User talk:Carrite|talk]]) 17:55, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
:: Yes. :) Please see Geoff's comments at [[Wikipedia:SOPA#.22Lobbying.22_and_Government_Affairs]]. [[User:Philippe (WMF)|Philippe Beaudette, Wikimedia Foundation]] ([[User talk:Philippe (WMF)|talk]]) 17:57, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
* WMF and Wikipedia should work '''with''' the legislative process, and not try to play the martyr. We are not Becket - and the Congress would listen to reasoned positions far better than to posturing here (popular as posturing is with some). I suggest that the obvious change to the legislation would be an exemption for all sites which have a '''"direct and active anti-copyright-violation process visible within the site" ''' which would take all of ten minutes to get introduced into the legislation, and would avoid the "dramah" currently seen. Cheers. [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 18:24, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
*** FAQ on this subject [[Wikipedia:SOPA#.22Lobbying.22_and_Government_Affairs|here]]; note that several amendments to lessen the impact of the bill, including one exempting nonprofits, were already proposed by various congresspeople and shot down before the recess. It's a difficult process. -- [[user:phoebe|phoebe]] / ([[user_talk:phoebe|talk to me]]) 22:57, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
** Many of us including myself don't consider this bill salvageable, even in principle. However, if we are forced to compromise, I agree that we should have some ideas about how we would alter the bill. I don't imagine your proposal would be accepted by the bill's proponents, since it offers an out for any site with any degree of legal oversight, no matter how inadequately skilled or staffed. In light of the fact that links to infringing sites are ''already illegal'' as contributory infringement, I would seek to exempt Wikipedia (and other sites) from being compelled to remove any content whatsoever, while still supplying a channel to request voluntary review and removal. [[User:Dcoetzee|Dcoetzee]] 18:54, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
** If all it takes is 10 minutes, why don't you do it? I'll pay you (which would come out at /hour) if you achieve this. Not that it would make the law much better, but any improvement is worth it. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 18:57, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

***I have absolutely no standing with the WMF - and thus no ability to reasonably expect to be heard. Else I certainly would. I do know, moreover, that ''not'' talking will ensure that the bill is ''not'' changed. Did you talk to your local legislator about how legislation is written, by the way? At this point, there is almost a 100% likelihood of passage of SOPA. Cheers. [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 19:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
****My "local legislator", in so far as that concept is applicable to a mixed proportional election system, is [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ingo_Wellenreuther Ingo Wellenreuther], possibly the most censorious member of the German [[Bundestag]]. I don't know if he has heard about SOPA, but I doubt he can do much about it. Indeed, you have no reasonable expectation of being heard as an individual. But collectively we all will be heard (if not necessarily heeded) if we go through with this protest. --[[User:Stephan Schulz|Stephan Schulz]] ([[User talk:Stephan Schulz|talk]]) 19:19, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
*****Alas for you then - but then SOPA has ''no'' actual direct connection with you, in that case. In the US, you will find most Congressmen (and women) handle a great deal of interaction with constituents. Cheers. [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 12:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

*What about timing? How long will we hold this? --[[User:Radiokid1010|Radiokid1010]] ([[User talk:Radiokid1010|talk]]) 18:55, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
** Great question. I've added a poll on this above, Radiokid1010, please express your opinion there. [[User:Dcoetzee|Dcoetzee]] 19:23, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
*** The WMF [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASOPA_initiative%2FAction&action=historysubmit&diff=471196191&oldid=471195090 moved this to the talk page]. [[User:Dcoetzee|Dcoetzee]] 19:48, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

*One question that somewhat bothers me. I can see supporting this if the WMF were the initiating group - since yes, SOPA would affect all WMF projects, and thus is harmful. As I'm reading it, however, the WMF doesn't seem to be necessarily backing the idea but instead saying they'll support en.wiki if there is consensus for this action. From a political nature, this isn't the right message. I think I would be better behind the idea if WMF says "We want to black out en.wiki per SOPA in this manner, but only if there is consensus to do it"; ''they'' are sending the message with the support of the WP community (presuming consensus) which is a much stronger impact that us collective editors making the decision. --[[User:Masem|MASEM]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 19:05, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
**I couldn't disagree more. What is stronger, the voice of millions or a few hundred? It has to come from the community. It's our future and our protest.[[User:Ocaasi|Ocaasi]] [[User talk:Ocaasi|t ]]|[[Special:Contributions/Ocaasi| c]] 20:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
*** Except its not our servers - it's the WMFs. It would be akin to staging a rally in a private business that agrees to let you be there by effectively discouraging people from using that business otherwise. Yes, ''you'' the rally-er, are making a statement, but the private business is not. --[[User:Masem|MASEM]] ([[User Talk:Masem|t]]) 21:42, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
**** The WMF is against the bill, and has spoken out against it, and is willing to support a protest; but project-wide action needs to come from the project. -- [[user:phoebe|phoebe]] / ([[user_talk:phoebe|talk to me]]) 22:51, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
*Did any one manage to count how many websites selling counterfeit drugs, watches, and other products wikipedia links to? [[User:John lilburne|John lilburne]] ([[User talk:John lilburne|talk]]) 19:08, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
** Here's one article that links to such a website: [[eBay]]. [[User:Dcoetzee|Dcoetzee]] 20:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
*** What is wikipedia doing linking to tat bazzar auctions, and why isn't eBay reacting to DMCA takedowns? [[User:John lilburne|John lilburne]] ([[User talk:John lilburne|talk]]) 21:45, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

*As you can see here: [[:de:Wikipedia_Diskussion:Initiative_gegen_den_SOPA#Europa_verhindert_SOPA_nicht:_Spanien]], the spanish gouvernment passes an anti-piracy law only a few days ago. Perhaps we should coordinate our activities with the wikipedians internationally. -- [[User:Andreas Werle|Andreas Werle]] ([[User talk:Andreas Werle|talk]]) 20:25, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
* I my view we should do a banner and a blackout. The banner should describe the problem and announce the blackout a few days before the blackout. The blackout will be a few minutes before midnight and at one minute before midnight wikipedia will be switched on, with a new banner. In this way, the blackout won´t harm anybody, but it is something the public will notice. --[[User:Goldzahn|Goldzahn]] ([[User talk:Goldzahn|talk]]) 20:39, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
*I support this action so long as it is limited to English Wikipedia only. The sister projects have not opted in, and there's no reason why consensus on English Wikipedia should be taken as consensus for other Wikimedia projects. Commons definitely ought not be blacked out given that it is used by non-English Wikipedias. Speaking as a Wikinews admin, I think that, if polled, the Wikinews community probably wouldn't want to participate. Given the size of the sister projects, it's no big deal - that you could still access Wikiquote or Wikiversity ''really'' won't affect the political impact of a Wikipedia shutdown. —[[User:Tom Morris|Tom Morris]] ([[User talk:Tom Morris|talk]]) 20:53, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
**I disagree with that sentiment, if only because the real danger in SOPA is for international/URL-shortening domains, and the [[Chilling Effect]] the passage of a law like SOPA has on their ability to be accessible (both within their own countries and by the US) should other countries follow suit. Because of the nature of the internet, SOPA is everybody's problem. [[User:Veled|Veled]] ([[User talk:Veled|talk]]) 21:58, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
*If conditions for Wikipedia become hostile, move the servers to another country. THAT would bring press coverage. If we start protesting one proposed law in one country, we will soon be drawn into all sorts of activism, I think it is better we do not start at all. Besides, how can a consensus emerge after such short time? Much of the wording above is POV. --[[User:Pgallert|Pgallert]] ([[User talk:Pgallert|talk]]) 21:21, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
*:Moving the Servers to a country outside the US will make things worse! -- [[User:Andreas Werle|Andreas Werle]] ([[User talk:Andreas Werle|talk]]) 21:48, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

* Isnt it funny? [http://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/lamar-smith-sopa-copyright-whoops The Author of SOPA Is a Copyright Violator] :) -- [[User:Andreas Werle|Andreas Werle]] ([[User talk:Andreas Werle|talk]]) 23:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

* '''The [[SOPA|SOPA article]] needs bringing up to a high and complete standard'''. [[user:FT2|FT2]] ([[User_talk:FT2|Talk]] | [[Special:Emailuser/FT2|email]]) 00:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

* There's something I learnt from [[:it:Wikipedia:Comunicato_4_ottobre_2011/en|it.wiki's strike]], which I'm proud to bring you in support as a fantastic success we owe to the entire WikiWorld. First and foremost I learnt that Wikipedia is now definitely part of the Society, therefore [[:s:Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights#Article_27|its rights]] deserve respect and protection just like anyone else's rights. We have the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community and to ''share'' in scientific advancement and its benefits; and we have the right to the protection of our moral and material interests resulting from any scientific, literary or artistic production of which we are the authors. Sometimes it may happen that unexpectedly we need to be protected from laws that could put at severe risk the free exercise of our rights; but we are entitled to this free exercise by something which is undoubtedly more important and longlasting than a local national act. Well, Wikipedia, the first fully-free content provider in the World, cannot be damaged by any local national law. Of course an unsustainable damage occurs when substancially no antagonist human right would ever be equitably protected by the mere imposition of an undue interference on Wikipedia's contents. Furthermore, nowhere on the planet did any dictatorship go beyond a simple censorship of Wikipedia: in some Countries it is forbidden to access wikipedia.org, but even in those Countries there isn't any law issued to influence Wikipedia's contents. In Italy there was an attempt, recently, but Wikipedia is the first fully-free content provider in Italy too, and when its voice was heard, it was the voice of this wonderful Project. [[:s:Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights#Article_30|No one is sufficiently entitled to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms granted us by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights]]. We still are in the Society to participate in the cultural life of the community, it won't be by local national laws that we will stop doing it. We are building together the hugest literary work ever written in history, and we are doing it to give every single person on the planet free access to the sum of all human knowledge. Be proud of this, ''be bold'' for this, be Wikipedian for all those who need free knowledge! ;-) --[[User:Gianfranco|g]] ([[User talk:Gianfranco|talk]]) 00:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
** [[:s:Universal_Declaration_of_Human_Rights#Article_27-2|Everyone has the right to the protection of the … material interests resulting from any … production of which he is the author.]] Universal Declaration of Human Rights art. 27. --[[User:Dervorguilla|Dervorguilla]] ([[User talk:Dervorguilla|talk]]) 10:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
***This includes Wikipedians - protect our work ;-) --[[User:Gianfranco|g]] ([[User talk:Gianfranco|talk]]) 10:44, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
****[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Gianfranco&diff=471341863&oldid=428894567 To be clear], I will completely support any action that our Collegues from the United States will identify as the most effective to protect the Project. In case you think a '''full blackout''' would be the most helpful form of protest, I am for the full blackout. Or for whatever might you think is the best for the Project. Personally speaking I would tell you that, should you believe that blanking completely WP, not only en.wiki, you have the right to do it. One is the Net, one is the Project, what happens to en.wiki happens to the whole Project, which is something in the Net. I am asking for indications by our friends in the U.S. because they directly know which could be the best strategies to develop ''there'', and I am not voting for this reason. But from outside, I can only say that I am with you at whatever extent ;-) --[[User:Gianfranco|g]] ([[User talk:Gianfranco|talk]]) 00:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

* Absolutely, this should be world-wise. This has directly effect on all of us. So the world pressure = better than just the USA.[[User:Pendragon5|Pendragon5]] ([[User talk:Pendragon5|talk]]) 01:49, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support''', I support a GLOBAL CLICK THROUGH and banner. How long will this go on? Just 24 hours or is this a week long protest? Or a month long?[[User:Electricmic|Electricmic]] ([[User talk:Electricmic|talk]]) 01:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
* International users who seem to believe this wouldn't affect them are taking a very narrow view. As the Wikipedia servers are hosted in the USA, any SOPA issues would affect ALL USERS. And contrary to popular belief, outside pressure can be very effective in altering legislation in any country. The threat of action from many of the major sites has already turned quite a few lawmakers off of supporting the bill. Keep it up and force more legislators to closely examine the bill and IT WILL fail. -- [[User:Cabazap|Alyas Grey]] : [[User talk:Cabazap|talk]] 04:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

=====Not blackout, but blacklist (that is, block all SOPA supporters)=====
As per [[User talk:Kenny Strawn#SOPA protest proposal|a section of my user talk page]], I would definitely support a protest, but not a full blackout. Instead, it would be nice to use a blacklist (preferably in the [[Help:MediaWiki namespace|MediaWiki namespace]] to essentially give all SOPA supporters (and organizations of supporters) on the blacklist who try to access Wikipedia a [[HTTP 403|403]] error. Basically, they censor us, we censor them. Hopefully some of us agree. [[User:Kenny Strawn|Kenny Strawn]] ([[User talk:Kenny Strawn|talk]]) 18:19, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

: I ''really'' don't think this would be possible. How do we identify the SOPA supporters? The corporate supporters of the bill? And when (the ones that have since withdrawn support)? And we block their IP ranges? That could very well be huge swathes of the Internet, collaterally damaging many users who strongly oppose the bill. (e.g. I edit from a GoDaddy IP, but I'm in no way affiliated with GoDaddy and I in no way support the bill.) — <tt>[[User talk:Madman|madman]]</tt> 18:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

: I think this would constitute irreconcilable hate, which I am against. People can be idiots, but they can stop being idiots too. Punishment provides no reward for becoming sensible, and in fact causes a desperate hard-line defensive to emerge that can be difficult or impossible to crack. No, this suggestion would do more harm than good, however much we dislike the people behind it. They will see the light only if you open the door. [[User:Badon|Badon]] ([[User talk:Badon|talk]]) 05:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

- Blackout (limited time) and blacklist (permanently) all SOPA supporters, such as sponsors of the bill, effective immediately, related article would show congressman's name, district, photo, and message "This person is permanently barred from Wikipedia". --[[User:SergeM256|SergeM256]] ([[User talk:SergeM256|talk]]) 19:35, 14 January 2012 (UTC){{spa|SergeM256}}

That would be discrimination. Besides, it's hard to identify supporters and opposers (and they'll have their ways to get around it). Besides, this doesn't contribute to creating awareness under all Wikipedia users. I support full blackout. [[User:Jurjenb|Jurjenb]] ([[User talk:Jurjenb|talk]]) 20:48, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

: '''Strongly disagree.''' Blacklisting specific users from accessing the wiki by IP address? That just spells disaster. False positives abound. And how could you tell? Even if you could identify SOPA supporters, I must disagree. --[[User:Stevoisiake|Stevoisiake]] ([[User talk:Stevoisiake|talk]]) 19:38, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
:'''Strong oppose'''. A blacklist is a bad idea, both because it goes against our core mission, and because there will be a backlash. Wikipedia is a resource for all, not those whose opinions we agree with. [[User:Superm401|Superm401]] - [[User_talk:Superm401|Talk]] 05:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

=====Why bother?=====
I honestly don't have the energy to spell out, ''again'', all the reasons this is a bad idea. It's pretty clear from the way this idea is being [[WP:FORUMSHOP|shopped]] between Jimbo's talk page, the [[WP:VPR#Coordinated SOPA reaction in early 2012 RfC|(still open) RFC at the village pump]], and [[WP:SOPA]] and its subpages that the proponents are determined to tire out the opponents and ram this down the community's throats, with the encouragement of the Foundation, irrespective of the actual status of the bill, and regardless of counterarguments. Anyone who's actually interested in deciding whether Wikipedia's the right place to do something like this can read the RFC linked above. I doubt very much that many of the support !voters here will bother to do that, since judging by their contribution histories a great many of them are users rather than editors of this encyclopedia, likely drawn by the banners. Rehashing the opposing arguments here will only provoke lectures about the values of this community by politically motivated fly-by-nighters who've done next to nothing to build content, and I'm just so not interested. Especially since, like I said, this seems likely to happen no matter what anybody says or does. This will be a different place after we do this. We'll still be "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" but also "Wikipedia, the crusading encyclopedia", expected to take stands in future debates. I'm sure I'm not alone in wondering whether I will want to contribute to that encyclopedia. [[User:Lagrange613|Lagrange]][[User talk:Lagrange613#top|613]] 09:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
:::Me too...I TOTALLY AGREE with your sentiment. [[User:GenQuest|GenQuest]] ([[User talk:GenQuest|talk]]) 05:59, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
::It just so happens that unless there is a crusade, the corporations in the US will sue Wikipedia if anyone happens to upload copyrighted content, then the wikimedia foundation will be pushed to restrict users even more reducing the quality of wikipedia and disrupting its growth to probably a level where it will no longer be "the free encyclopedia". So in answer to your question "why bother?" because if you even want to continue being a "contributor" then you should. --[[User:Camilo Sanchez|Camilo Sanchez]] ([[User talk:Camilo Sanchez|talk]]) 17:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
:::Or just move the servers outside the US. Done. I agree that this reeks of forum-shopping - even the banner which has FINALLY appeared doesn't give anyone who isn't already in the know the impression that this could be as serious as ''shutting down the entire site'' for a day. [[User:Modest Genius|Modest Genius]] [[User_talk:Modest Genius|talk]] 17:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
:::Also I was asking "Why bother fighting this in yet another forum", not "Why bother blanking the encyclopedia". [[User:Lagrange613|Lagrange]][[User talk:Lagrange613#top|613]] 18:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
: I read them, and re-read it just now. The process has been pretty standard. An idea is mooted on Village Pump or Jimbo's talk page, there seems some (or considerable) interest informally in it, so it moves to its own page for more in-depth discussion. It gets supported or opposed, and changes may be made. Nothing unusual here at all in terms of process, no evidence of anyone being "tired out". If there was a much larger view against, it would show up above. It hasn't. If you want an example of a really tooth-and-claw RFC look at the many RFCs surrounding flagged revisions/pending changes. Apart from its subject matter, this one's actually boringly routine. [[user:FT2|FT2]] ([[User_talk:FT2|Talk]] | [[Special:Emailuser/FT2|email]]) 12:38, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
:: Your other point deserves a thoughtful answer. I can't speak for anyone else but mine was in [http://blog.wikimedia.org/2011/12/13/how-sopa-will-hurt-the-free-web-and-wikipedia/#comment-47085 this reply at the WMF blog] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:SOPA_initiative/Action&diff=471306323&oldid=471306120 this comment above]. I hope they explain the reasons I (and perhaps some others) feel this is important for Wikipedia/Wikimedia and for our educational mission. [[user:FT2|FT2]] ([[User_talk:FT2|Talk]] | [[Special:Emailuser/FT2|email]]) 12:47, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

:The above comment by Lagrange613 contains some very *cough* interesting arguments, starting with the POV section title. First there is the accusation that this is being "rammed this down the community's throats", ignoring the overwhelming consensus, then there is the elitist discounting of the opinions of those who read but do not edit Wikipedia, as if only the opinions of those who build content matter. Then there is an accusation that community input is being ignored ("this seems likely to happen no matter what anybody says or does") which is rather ironic, given the explicit rejection of consensus that precedes it. Then there is the claim that Wikipedia will be "expected to take stands in future [political] debates", ignoring the fact that this particular bit of politics is a clear threat to Wikipedia, and lastly there is the threat to stop contributing if he doesn't get his way. I don't find any of these arguments to be particularly compelling. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 14:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
::This entire effort is POV; if you object to users contributing to this discussion based on their personal POV, then you're on my side. I do think that people who participate here regularly and are more familiar with what's actually done here on a daily basis should have more say in questions of what Wikipedia is about fundamentally, which is what this is. You can call that elitist if you want, but as I've written before you're opening the door for [[Bill O'Reilly]] to change Wikipedia by getting 1% of his nightly audience to register accounts. Wikipedia's [[Alexa rank]] is 6; every bill about the internet concerns us. Finally, I'm really not threatening to leave, just expressing my level of sadness and frustration with this, uh, process. It may cause me to leave, but that shouldn't influence anyone's decision; whether it could cause many other content-driven rather than politics-driven editors to lose interest probably should. [[User:Lagrange613|Lagrange]][[User talk:Lagrange613#top|613]] 17:33, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
:Long term editors and contributors have even more of themselves vested in the project, and in seeing it not put at risk by poorly drafted legislation. And even if the legislation is changing, speaking out against it in force will encourage it to change in a direction that will protect our efforts. --[[User_talk:Trödel|Trödel]] 15:34, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
::my why bother, is - why allow the rent seeking activity of the congress, drive activity here? you do of course understand that this "issue", lobbyist written bill, is calculated to polarize, inflame, generate funds. this is how the political system exacts rents from productive society. i wonder if they also shorted isp's, (covering on backlash), and went long studios. clearly the isp's are not investing enough in political "investment". a better wiki would be serene, and have an off-shore contingency plan. [[British Virgin Islands]] anyone? [[User:Slowking4| Slowking4]]⇔[[User_talk:Slowking4| †@1₭]] 16:29, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Anything Wikipedia does has got to be able to take into account last minute changes to SOPA. It is already reported that one of the founders of SOPA wanted to remove the DNS blocking provision. If it's out of the bill, Wikipedia could end up looking very foolish unless we carefully update exactly what our complaints are about the bill. It could even backfire if our page stresses a removed provision too much, making it look like we have few complaints with the rest of it. And any arbitrary part of the bill could be changed five hours before we go live with the anti-SOPA page. This is not to say we shouldn't do something, but we *need* to be *sure* that we can rapidly respond to changes. Also, this really needs to include Protect IP as well, not just SOPA[[User:Ken Arromdee|Ken Arromdee]] ([[User talk:Ken Arromdee|talk]]) 16:39, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

: Er, no. The official reports I can find all say that the sponsors has said they will concede "postponing" only (not removing, much less "wanted to remove") ''one'' part of the protested issues.... [[user:FT2|FT2]] ([[User_talk:FT2|Talk]] | [[Special:Emailuser/FT2|email]]) 16:44, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
::Okay, but my general points are still valid:
:: 1) "SOPA" should include at least Protect IP as well. We don't want readers to think that Protect IP is okay as a substitute.
:: 2) We need to be responsive to last minute changes. We're going to look very foolish if something about SOPA changes on the 17th (or has changed now but many of us don't realize it) and the blackout page says that SOPA is a bad idea because of some part of it that's not in there any more. [[Special:Contributions/208.65.89.236|208.65.89.236]] ([[User talk:208.65.89.236|talk]]) 02:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Can you really accuse something of being forum shopped for its benefit when it finds more or less overwhelming support in every forum it shows up in? If anything I think you could only argue that if there were shopping here it would be shopping for a forum which didn't support it. --[[User:Gmaxwell|Gmaxwell]] ([[User talk:Gmaxwell|talk]]) 00:05, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
:At the RFC I linked it's gotten about 70% approval, or [[WP:RFA|the bare minimum we insist on]] for appointing an [[WP:ADMIN|administrator]]. We're talking about taking down the encyclopedia, which in my view requires a higher bar of support. Many of the support !votes above are [[WP:SPA|SPAs]] or don't indicate the reasoning behind their support. So while it certainly gets ''majority'' support in the various fora in which it's appeared, this is not (supposed to be) a vote. [[User:Lagrange613|Lagrange]][[User talk:Lagrange613#top|613]] 18:22, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

::Good evening Wikipedia. Allow me first to apologize for this commentary. I do, like many of you appreciate the comforts of every article without the input of some user making it look biased. I enjoy that as any Wikipedian. But in the spirit of conversation, thereby those important events of the past usually associated with some legislation or the end of some fruitless struggle in congress, a conversation about a nice law for the people, I thought we could mark this article, an article that is sadly turned into a forum let's take some time out of our daily editing to sit down and have a little chat. There are of course those who do not want us to speak. I suspect even now orders are being written by mail, and men with more computers will soon be on their way. Why? Because while the truncheon may be used in lieu of conversation, words will always retain their power. Words offer the means to meaning and for those who will listen, the enunciation of truth. And the truth is, there is something wrong with this country, isn't there? Censorship, legislation, intolerance and oppression.

::And where back in the 90s you had the freedom to link and post as you saw fit, you now have censor and a legislation of surveillance coercing your websites and requesting their dimission. How would this happen? Who's to blame? Well, certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you are looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror. I know why you would do it. I know you don't know. Who would have? Huge media corporations, legal threats, consumerism, there are a myriad of ways to keep you ignorant, ways that conspired to corrupt your ability of knowing and rob you from your right to understand it. Congress got the best of you and in your ignorance the corporations turned to the now high congressman [[Lamar S. Smith|Lamar Smith (R-TX)]]

::He promised them gains, he promised them control so the media could achieve in return the ability to sue you as they saw fit. Today we can end this promise, today we can stop the Stop Online Piracy Act so we can remind this world what it has forgotten. More than 30 years ago [[Vint Cerf|two great men]] developed the [[Internet protocol suite|TCP/IP]] and embedded it forever in our computers. Their hope was to remind the world that communication, freedom, and innovation are more than words, they are perspectives. So if you've seen nothing, if the legislation of this congress remain unknown to you then I would suggest you allow this project page to pass unmarked. But if you see what I see, if you feel as I feel, and if you would seek as I seek, then I ask you to stand beside the Wikimedia Foundation during a full blackout and together we shall give them a January 18th that shall never, ever be forgot. --[[User:Camilo Sanchez|Camilo Sanchez]] ([[User talk:Camilo Sanchez|talk]]) 08:00, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

=====White House stance on SOPA et al=====
I received an email this morning from the White House regarding its answer to [https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/petition/veto-sopa-bill-and-any-other-future-bills-threaten-diminish-free-flow-information/g3W1BscR this petition] on its [https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#!/ ''We the People''] page. Here is [https://wwws.whitehouse.gov/petitions#/!/response/combating-online-piracy-while-protecting-open-and-innovative-internet their view] on SOPA and related legislation. '''[[User:UpstateNYer|upstate]][[User talk:UpstateNYer|NYer]]''' 18:23, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
:I give you an "A" for effort but the reply to you is so worded as to be for it ''and'' against it. Typical. Better off trying the Congressman, especially your own from your state, as well as the Committee on Judiciary. [[User:Mugginsx|Mugginsx]] ([[User talk:Mugginsx|talk]]) 18:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
:President Obama can be commended for throwing us a bone. But the stark reality is that it's the Congress where we have to maintain our focus. SOPA/PIPA have to be stopped cold in the Congress at the earliest possible point, and whenever any of its embers get sparked again. In short, let's stay vigilant. [[User:Stevietheman|'''Stevie is the man!''']] [[User talk:Stevietheman|Talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Stevietheman|Work]] 19:27, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
:Yea, I just meant for that to be an FYI. Don't forget, he's the last step in the law-making process. '''[[User:UpstateNYer|upstate]][[User talk:UpstateNYer|NYer]]''' 20:14, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Obama said that he was against [[NDAA 2012]], yet he signed it and the power to detain US citizens indefinitely into law after a tiny modification. We can't depend on Obama and his veto powers. He, as with most other politicians, isn't dependable. Stay the course; sent a message to Congress via the blackout. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] ([[User talk:Michaeldsuarez|talk]]) 21:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

::I appreciate Michaeldsuarez's cynicism. However, the president's veto pen is an essential tool if we can muster support for our view of the matter within the administration. This White House response to a petition opposing SOPA identifies three key staffers, [[Victoria Espinel]], the Intellectual Property Enforcement Coordinator at the [[Office of Management and Budget]], [[Aneesh Chopra]], the [[Chief Technology Officer of the United States]] and Assistant to the President and Associate Director for Technology at the [[Office of Science and Technology Policy]], and [[Howard Schmidt]], Special Assistant to the President and Cybersecurity Coordinator for National Security Staff, operating in the [[Executive Office of the President of the United States]]. These are certainly among the key players in the White House on this issue. Obama himself is ''the'' key player. Of course, it would be best if Congress didn't pass SOPA. But we need to have a fallback position. If Congress forges ahead against our opposition, these three are the people we must speak to in order to have any hope that President Obama will veto this bill. Please, no matter what we decide here, be sure to speak directly to these three people, describing our opposition in a respectful and intelligent way. To ignore them would be a grave failure. [[User:Cullen328|'''Cullen'''328]] [[User talk:Cullen328|''Let's discuss it'']] 07:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
:Who is "we", and how can "we" reach these people with the likelyhood that we would be heard.

Per this morning's ''New York Times'': " The Obama administration said Saturday that it strongly opposed central elements of two Congressional efforts to enforce copyrights on the Internet, all but killing the current versions of legislation that has divided both political parties and pitted Hollywood against Silicon Valley."[http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/15/us/white-house-says-it-opposes-parts-of-2-antipiracy-bills.html] The White House's specific objection? "We will not support legislation that reduces freedom of expression, increases cybersecurity risk or undermines the dynamic, innovative global Internet." So Obama rejects the measure for the specific reason the community objects to it. The only way for this to become law is for big chunks of Democrats in the House and Senate to vote to override a Democratic President's veto in an election year—not gonna happen. It's over, and Wikipedia won. The only question now is whether we [[WP:STICK|drop the stick]]. [[User:Lagrange613|Lagrange]][[User talk:Lagrange613#top|613]] 18:59, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

::Obama also was against the controversial provisions in the NDAA but he still signed it into law, and almost every Democrat voted for it even under threat of a presidential veto. Reminder that on top of it the senate version, Protect-IP was introduced by a Democrat. Wikipedia/the internet didn't win crap yet, all they've done is postponed hearings and talked about possibly taking out the DNS part of SOPA(which even with that out SOPA is still terrible), but we know how congress acts. They could very easily just be hoping no internet blackout occurs, the hubbub dies down, and then they ram it through congress under the radar. We, the collective internet, need to show we're not playing around. It's finally starting to break through, yesterday for the first time I finally heard one of the big cable news networks do a report on SOPA despite their corporate owners being amongst the largest supporters of it. Let's have the internet give them a story to die for come the 18th.[[User:TheMadcapSyd|TheMadcapSyd]] ([[User talk:TheMadcapSyd|talk]]) 19:17, 15 January 2012 (UTC) — [[User:TheMadcapSyd|TheMadcapSyd]]
:::NDAA was a totally different animal. For one thing, it funds the Defense Department, so it was guaranteed to pass in one form or another. SOPA does not belong to the same class of politically "must-pass" legislation. Congress can't make laws, rammed through or otherwise, without the President getting a chance to veto, and he's already indicated he's against the very premise of the bill as written. Arguments that "we, the collective internet" (not we, Wikipedia) must take down the encyclopedia regardless of the bill's actual status demonstrate how far divorced this proposal has become from rationality and good judgment. [[User:Lagrange613|Lagrange]][[User talk:Lagrange613#top|613]] 20:42, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

=====SOPA/PIPA Hearings Postponed=====
[http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120113/23560217407/sopa-delayed-cantor-promises-it-wont-be-brought-to-floor-until-issues-are-addressed.shtml SOPA Delayed; Cantor Promises It Won't Be Brought To The Floor Until 'Issues Are Addressed']
[http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9223456/GOP_lawmakers_seek_to_postpone_PIPA_vote GOP lawmakers seek to postpone PIPA vote]
Should we continue with our planned blackout on the 18th?

*'''No''' Again I iterate that "making noise" is fun, but it is calm words with legislators which get things done. ''Thunder is good, thunder is impressive; but it is lightning that does the work'' - and for legislation, it is the grunt-work of negotiation which is the "lightning". [[User:Collect|Collect]] ([[User talk:Collect|talk]]) 12:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

'''Yes''' we should continue, they postponed it not because of kind words but because of massive outrage and the threat of an internet blackout by the giants of the internet. Stopping is exactly what they(in this case the lobbyist from the corporate media/entertainment industries) want us to do. Let the anger fade away, let the talk stop, ect, so congress can then ram the bill through under the radar. A protest that didn't inconvenience someone has never accomplished anything and has never had its message heard. The big cable networks have finally started doing reports on SOPA despite their owners being amongst the bill's largest proponents, they finally couldn't ignore it any longer given the amount of attention it has been receiving. So let us, the collective internet, give them a story to die for. The issue at hand is the message, most people of the general public still don't even know about SOPA and no one is going to read a stupid click-thru banner. Despite how terrible all of them may be, a large number of people still get their news from TV news stations and they're finally just starting to report on SOPA(and the reports I've seen are actually pretty fair). God you don't let off pressure when it looks like you're starting to win.[[User:TheMadcapSyd|TheMadcapSyd]] ([[User talk:TheMadcapSyd|talk]]) 19:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Please visit the similar discussion at [[Wikipedia_talk:SOPA_initiative/Action#Rep._Issa_has_postponed_the_January_18_hearings_on_SOPA]] as well. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] ([[User talk:Michaeldsuarez|talk]]) 21:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

=====Reason why servers are located in the United States=====
Possibly because only the United States has [[1st Amendment to the United States Constitution#Freedom of speech|Freedom of speech]] embedded in its Constitution? (Aside from the Foundation being located and chartered in the United States.) Even if SOPA passed and was found Constitutional, the US might still be the country in which the most freedom would be available. — [[User:Arthur Rubin|Arthur Rubin]] [[User talk:Arthur Rubin|(talk)]] 17:26, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
:*"only the United States has [[1st Amendment to the United States Constitution#Freedom of speech|Freedom of speech]] embedded in its Constitution"!? um, no that is not true; '''''many''''' countries have constitutionally-guaranteed freedom of speech. as to how complete that freedom, or how well the freedom is enforced, the usa has neither the best, nor the worst record. [[User:Lx 121|Lx 121]] ([[User talk:Lx 121|talk]]) 07:19, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
:*Arthur needs to see the world a bit, indeed the US is not the only country that has freedom of speech embedded in the constitution. I would even say that the US respects freedoms less then in a lot of other nations. If SOPA passes, the Wiki servers should probably move to Europe. Maybe place them in the same basement as Wiki Leaks? Too bad for all the American users that will have to find their way around the copy of the Great Chinese Firewall that the US will implement, but at least Wikipedia will be safe for the rest of the world. [[User:Jurjenb|Jurjenb]] ([[User talk:Jurjenb|talk]]) 12:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
:If SOPA were to be enacted, the first problem that will create for us is the need to move our servers out of the US. The second problem will be that our US-editors and readers will be cut off from the ability to view those servers without filtration-- splitting off the US population from our main global community. --[[User:HectorMoffet|HectorMoffet]] ([[User talk:HectorMoffet|talk]]) 19:01, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
::Move it to Sweden! --'''[[User:Jeffwang|J]] [[User_talk:Jeffwang|(t)]]''' 20:03, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
:::Depends on what's taken out of both bills once the problems that have been addressed are taken out. --[[User:Radiokid1010|Radiokid1010]] ([[User talk:Radiokid1010|talk]]) 01:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
:::I think there might be something very helpful in focusing on moving to another jurisdiction. I think it could be very emotionally powerful if Wikipedia just mentioned the possibility that it would no longer be legal to operate in the US.
:::Why Sweden? I imagine Switzerland or the Vatican or the former Soviet Union as 'politically powerful' locations, but Sweden hasn't occurred to me. Do tell. [[User:HectorMoffet|HectorMoffet]] ([[User talk:HectorMoffet|talk]]) 13:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

==== Other suggestions ====
It's been mentioned that some folks might welcome the chance to provide a few general thoughts and alternate suggestions, mostly for discussion. Some of those suggestions might not play out directly to this action, but would give us ideas for advocacy down the road. [[User:JayWalsh|JayWalsh]] ([[User talk:JayWalsh|talk]]) 01:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

* Since we are suppose to be '''[[WP:BOLD|BOLD]]''', I suggest the "English Wikipedia" in USA goes "TRUE DARK" on January 1. By "TRUE DARK", I mean provide only a simple web page protesting SOPA and zero access to wikipedia content. One step back from this would be to lock-out everyone that doesn't have an account, and disable account creation during those "true dark" hours. I prefer the Reddit protest hours of 8AM to 8PM (EST), but I'll back shorter hours or an hour here and there if people thinks its too long. • [[User:Sbmeirow|Sbmeirow]] • [[User talk:Sbmeirow|Talk]] • 02:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
::Make it even MORE unavoidable and inconvenient. Random 5 minute periods of "TRUE DARK' throughout the day, several per hour. [[User:JakeInJoisey|JakeInJoisey]] ([[User talk:JakeInJoisey|talk]]) 17:17, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

* I suggest that we mirror the actions of Reddit[http://blog.reddit.com/2012/01/stopped-they-must-be-on-this-all.html], the Cheezburger network[http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20120112/12195217391/cheezburger-sites-join-reddit-january-18th-blackout.shtml][http://twitter.com/benhuh/statuses/157538541155516416?_escaped_fragment_=/benhuh/status/157538541155516416#!/benhuh/status/157538541155516416], Minecraft[http://www.maximumpc.com/files/u138055/minecraft_sopa.jpg], Tucows[http://tucowsinc.com/news/2012/01/why-we-dont-like-sopa/], and other websites[http://www.xda-developers.com/announcements/xda-to-go-dark-on-jan-18th-at-8am-you-can-help-bring-us-back-online/][http://www.majorleaguegaming.com/news/mlgs-network-will-go-black-on-jan-18-to-protest-sopa] by blacking out the English Wikipedia worldwide on January 18th from 8am–8pm EST (1300–0100 UTC), replacing Wikipedia with a simple message. This is not the time to negotiate a bunch of details amongst ourselves that we simply cannot reach agreement on by January 18th.

:If you agree, add "Follow Reddit" or "Reddit Option" to your vote above. If you disagree, add "Don't Follow Reddit" or "No Reddit Option" to your vote above. This will indicate that, in addition to your support of a specific proposal for, say, a US-only blackout, you either support or oppose following Reddit's lead as a second choice. If this is your first choice, vote below and add "second choice after Reddit option" or "second choice after following Reddit" to your above vote. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 03:09, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

* Jan 18 hearing on hill,[http://www.theatlanticwire.com/technology/2012/01/faced-sopa-protest-one-senator-just-blinked/47379/]; [http://oversight.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1554%253A1-18-12-hearing-on-dns-a-search-engine-blocking&catid=12&Itemid=1] attend, then sit down in street; get arrested. should be $100 post & forfeit. [[User:Slowking4| Slowking4]]⇔[[User_talk:Slowking4| †@1₭]] 04:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

* I just want to point out that this page will be '''flooded''' with people against SOPA, and there's probably going to be a "[[silent majority]]" of non-editors who are angered when the site goes down. So don't read too much into the votes. I think the WMF should just perform whatever office action it thinks is right, and not try to hold a kangaroo court for justifying its tough choice. (BTW I voted for the blackout!) [[User:Froth|.froth.]] ([[User talk:Froth|talk]]) 05:41, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

* As a separate point, in the future I think it should be clear in the voting headers that people voting for a full blackout are also voting for a click-through, should the full blackout not be accepted. Then you don't have to deal with the "1 prefer 2" or whatever. [[User:Froth|.froth.]] ([[User talk:Froth|talk]]) 05:42, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

* SOPA cuts both ways. Lawmakers need the internet community (and its free generous help) more than they seem to realize. I'd be interested to see discussion of '''a formal 24 hr block of House + Senate + other relevant IP ranges (supporting businesses?)''', to drive home this point: - that if lawmakers don't act nice, the internet community might decide not to either.

: After all, if SOPA passes the pirates will just use other routes. But where will legislators find replacements for the sites they have come to rely upon for work, if sites freely providing services, decided to forbid lawmakers and their departments or offices using them? A formal 24 hr block notice for federal IPs might really make a few people think very hard about what the internet community gives freely and generously to all. It would certainly gain coverage of a different kind than "Lots of sites including Wikipedia shut down for a day". [[user:FT2|FT2]] ([[User_talk:FT2|Talk]] | [[Special:Emailuser/FT2|email]]) 11:54, 14 January 2012 (UTC) (being controversial for the day and having been nudged to post this thought!)

::Congress can hurt you far more than you can hurt it. Don't imagine you can play that game. And worse, such an idea would make Wikipedia into a political battleground far beyond anything that has ever been seen on it before. -- [[User:Seth Finkelstein|Seth Finkelstein]] ([[User talk:Seth Finkelstein|talk]]) 13:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
::: I think I last heard that sort of reason not to oppose bad law during the civil rights movement. Without getting into politics, let's just say my own feeling is that the signals being sent are pretty strong (although you don't like those either), but stronger may be needed since this directly impacts our belief in free accessible knowledge and mass collaboration. I seriously doubt we (or anyone else) will get warred upon for a 24 hour block, much the same as people don't get warred on for supporting other parties or appealing federal decisions to the courts. If the law gives a right of refusal to provide a service, that's the law. I didn't notice any worries about legality of withdrawing services to protest [[apartheid|other countries' policies]] doing harm, or against [[:Category:Protests in the United States|other laws in the U.S.]]. If you think it ''would'' be that significant, that's almost an argument you're advancing in favor. Either way the point should be made that the internet ecosystem isn't just the United States, nor is it obligated to abandon its sense of freedoms to harmful ideas. [[user:FT2|FT2]] ([[User_talk:FT2|Talk]] | [[Special:Emailuser/FT2|email]]) 14:12, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
::::I believe such an action would be needlessly inflammatory while serving no positive purpose. It would certainly undermine much of Wikipedia's positioning as a project which is not a political football (and make no mistake, that is what's going on here, and members of Congress are quite skilled in analyzing such situations). This would be risked for no significant reward. The backlash would likely be more disruptive than SOPA. -- [[User:Seth Finkelstein|Seth Finkelstein]] ([[User talk:Seth Finkelstein|talk]]) 14:40, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
::::: Those are far more worthy points than a mere "You'll get hurt if you protest". In the parlance, they "speak to the point". Thanks for that. The points you make are possibly accurate, or possibly not. One reason for the original post is so that these possible routes can have daylight and have those different perspectives considered.

::::: There are times when it's best to stay silent (or "choose one's battles"), and times it's incumbent to speak up with as much force as can be found. A lot of times are in between. A concern with this legislation is it's a defining moment for the freedoms achieved through this medium. It's a defining moment when we say to other countries "follow our lead" and state clearly what our lead will be. It's a point where bad law is going to have a disproportionate effect and the people guiding it don't seem to appreciate that.

::::: The hearings of December disparagingly and repeatedly referenced "nerds" - in fact some of those concerned are world famous names. It says a lot for the ignorance going on here. Hence it's worth suggesting how they may be helped to understand how seriously others they represent, are taking it. The internet ecosystem itself has the right to make clear its stances, and to add such pressure as it may hold, if it so chooses.

::::: As a charity we have only a limited part in that. As a ''worldwide community with a mission of free knowledge and mass collaboration, and with specific interest in places where exactly this activity already takes place'', where the very ecosystem that makes our work possible is at risk (and noting circumvention is federally funded and endorsed by human rights bodies where it does occur) - it's in our ballpark. Our editors, our readers, our mission, and the work of others in similar missions, are at risk from this. [[user:FT2|FT2]] ([[User_talk:FT2|Talk]] | [[Special:Emailuser/FT2|email]]) 15:00, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

::<s>I find something appealing in the idea of a total blackout for legislative offices, because I suspect quite a number of legislators have no real conception of how much their staffs depend on internet services like ours for day-to-day operations, and this would open their eyes. However, targeted interference could easily engender hostility toward, rather than support for our cause. ~ [[User:Ningauble|Ningauble]] ([[User talk:Ningauble|talk]]) 14:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)</s>
::I am advised by a 'bot, acting on behalf of a consensus of administrators, that my responses to this RfC are inapplicable or unclear. Whereas my response to the above proposition represents my best effort to communicate my position on that specific proposition, and whereas it has been deemed unacceptable, I am therefore striking it and withdrawing from this RfC. ~ [[User:Ningauble|Ningauble]] ([[User talk:Ningauble|talk]]) 23:44, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
* This is really the most [messed] up "ballot" I've ever seen. Question 1 should have been: "Should there be action on SOPA?" — yes or no. Question 2 should have been — "If yes, should the action be taken on Jan. 18 or some other date?" Question 3 should have been — "If yes, which of these options should be employed? Please support only two." And they should have been listed simply, in logical progression of severity of impact. Group sourcing ballots is clearly something that doesn't work. Democracy good, structure good. [[User:Carrite|Carrite]] ([[User talk:Carrite|talk]]) 17:45, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
** I agree that more forethought into the structure would have been useful. I boldly instituted the multiple-choice structure for the first question because we had a bunch of people opposing for totally different reasons, and it was pretty confusing. I don't think your proposed structure would work though, because people opposed to a SOPA protest action would be upset by having questions they're "not supposed to answer" because they didn't answer "yes" to previous questions. For whatever reason, I think everyone wants to add their opinion to every question. [[User:Dcoetzee|Dcoetzee]] 20:15, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
***Don't let perfect be the enemy of good. We're short on time and expertise. We don't have a month to debate the process. Even with it's deficiencies, we such such a clear consensus that even if the format of the ballot were changed, the result would very likely be the same. [[User:Jehochman|Jehochman]] [[User talk:Jehochman|Talk]] 00:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
So the idea is to oppose what is essentially censorship, by voluntarily shutting down? It would make more sense to remove all product and business references to new products sold by SOPA supporters for a fixed and lengthy period of time. A monetary impact if you will. And not accept their apologies or flip-flop on policy until the establish timeframe has completed.
:Self-harm has a [[Self-immolation|storied history]] as a mode of protest. [[User:Froth|.froth.]] ([[User talk:Froth|talk]]) 22:24, 14 January 2012 (UTC)
:: There is something immensely noteworthy about the fact that almost every supporter of the bill has placed their entire social marketing structure almost exclusively in the hands of strong opposers of the bill that are stated to be willing to consider a blackout. One has to wonder how long (say) Sony would endorse SOPA or PIPA if told that Google searches, Google+ site, Twitter feeds and hashtags, Facebook pages, Yahoo! searches, and the like for their business worldwide would not return results for 24 hours or as needed (with explanatory message as applicable) until they acted nice.

:: Google didn't need anyone's permission to remove matters it felt it didn't want in results, nor Google+ to remove profiles it didn't approve of, nor Twitter to block tweets. If a business feels SOPA puts their back against the wall, they may feel the risk is minimal. I suspect ''MPAA et al'' depend on these businesses and the internet rather more than these businesses and the internet depends on ''MPAA et al'' (especially faced with a business-model-breaking law in the aisles), and facing this as well as mass public protests, would re-evaluate their own [[BATNA|best alternative resolution]] faster than the eye could follow. [[user:FT2|FT2]] ([[User_talk:FT2|Talk]] | [[Special:Emailuser/FT2|email]]) 04:31, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

It might be a good idea to link to the [[wikt:sopa#Noun 4|Wiktionary definition of SOPA]], since it gives a very good understanding of what it is: "a piece of trash". --[[User:Stefan2|Stefan2]] ([[User talk:Stefan2|talk]]) 11:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

*I quote a hale and hearty colleague, and am in full agreement: {{quotation|I honestly don't have the energy to spell out, again, all the reasons this is a bad idea. It's pretty clear from the way this idea is being shopped between Jimbo's talk page, the (still open) RFC at the village pump, and WP:SOPA and its subpages that the proponents are determined to tire out the opponents and ram this down the community's throats, with the encouragement of the Foundation, irrespective of the actual status of the bill, and regardless of counterarguments. Anyone who's actually interested in deciding whether Wikipedia's the right place to do something like this can read the RFC linked above. I doubt very much that many of the support !voters here will bother to do that, since judging by their contribution histories a great many of them are users rather than editors of this encyclopedia, likely drawn by the banners. Rehashing the opposing arguments here will only provoke lectures about the values of this community by politically motivated fly-by-nighters who've done next to nothing to build content, and I'm just so not interested. Especially since, like I said, this seems likely to happen no matter what anybody says or does. This will be a different place after we do this. We'll still be "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" but also "Wikipedia, the crusading encyclopedia", expected to take stands in future debates. I'm sure I'm not alone in wondering whether I will want to contribute to that encyclopedia. Lagrange613 09:07, 14 January 2012 (UTC)}} Sorry to leave out the Wikilinked things; the ''words'' are what matter the most. As I said, I am totally in agreement.--[[User:Djathinkimacowboy|Djathinkimacowboy]] [[User talk:Djathinkimacowboy|''what now?!'']] 13:35, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

*'''Missing the other huge prong''' Give a concise description of the situation and issues in a prominent place. (don't forget, 90% of even Wikipedians don't even know what SOPA is and what the problem is) And make it easy for the to write their congressman, senator and president to give their opinion. Blackout is good, but informing and facilitating action would be much more powerful. ''North8000'' ([[User talk:North8000#top|talk]]) 13:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

* Why are the Wiki servers located in the USA anyway ? I know its probably more convenient in many ways, but there are many more internet-legislation-friendly countries to locate in, and thus freeing Wikipedia of some of the more pointless pieces of US legislation which they constantly have to look out for. Though SOPA seems to be a law that the US govt wants to extend to anywhere and anyone on the planet they have a beef with. [[User:The Yeti|The Yeti]] ([[User talk:The Yeti|talk]]) 14:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

*'''Changing the default skin to something SOPA-specific'''. I think we should send a signal, but responding to censorship with censorship is not the way to go in my view. Changing the default skin for not logged-in users could be done in a way that gets the message across. This could also work in tandem with banners or click-through. -- [[User:Daniel Mietchen|Daniel Mietchen]] - [[:m:WiR/OS|WiR/OS]] ([[User talk:Daniel Mietchen|talk]]) 14:14, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
===== How to protect wikipedia against copyright policies and censorship =====
'''Intelligently oppose''' to SOPA - Wikipedians have to deal with political games, especially if they are not in their interest. But the English Wikipedia is neither African, British, Irish, Canadian, or Indian in what sense however, and certainly not US (for political reasons, of course, not because I am denying the participation of US-Americans)!!! The problem is one ruled by an ill form of destroying the globe (called "globalism"). There are certainly international organized responses to it (certainly Wikipedia is, as well). I propose to ask the experts who defend the rights of an open knowledge and education law concerning copyright interests:

[http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~tvelden/talks/2004-cern.pdf]

The Max Planck Association declared an open access declaration at Berlin 2004. I suggest to share their experience to share material with other contributors and to offer individual material here and for others, but in a way that everybody can use it for distributing free knowledge, and nobody who would like to claim it as their property.

'''WIKIPEDIA IS NOT THE WILD WEST WHERE YOU CAN SET YOUR CLAIM!'''

This is my opinion and not of the wikipedians, but for a consense we need a brain, and not only ours... Also a solution for US located servers should be found – I like the proposition to move them.

--[[User:Platonykiss|Platonykiss]] ([[User talk:Platonykiss|talk]]) 14:43, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

:Move them where? US law is almost uniquely well suited to what we do. In Canada and much of Europe, for example, NPOV can not be maintained because factual reporting about the views of crazy people run afoul of ham fisted anti-"hate-speech" laws, or as another example in the UK the liability for saying something negative about someone, even if its true, is basically unbounded under their libel laws. This has been carefully analyzed many times in the past, and the reason that Wikimedia (as well as many organizations with similar free speech challenges) are located in the US. All these crazy copyright laws we got in the US came along with strong protections for service providers. The same balance isn't found elsewhere --[[Special:Contributions/71.191.197.79|71.191.197.79]] ([[User talk:71.191.197.79|talk]]) 00:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

:SOPA has specific provisions targeting "foreign infringing site." If Wikipedia relocated abroad, it could be accused of being one. Thus, that idea is unlikely to help and might well hurt. [[User:Superm401|Superm401]] - [[User_talk:Superm401|Talk]] 06:02, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Access to SOPA and a handful of directly-related articles =====

Someone brought up an interesting point above. Wikipedia would likely be most people's main source for SOPA articles. Could we have a poll on allowing a small number of articles, related to the act? I'd say [[SOPA]], [[PROTECT IP Act]], [[OPEN Act]], and any article which has "censorship" or "intellectual property" in the title. --[[User:Quintucket|Quintucket]] ([[User talk:Quintucket|talk]]) 14:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. Seems like a good idea. --[[User:Piotrus|Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus]]|[[User talk:Piotrus| talk to me]] 16:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. This needs to be done globally along with a worldwide blackout. thanks [[User:Robin klein|Robin klein]] ([[User talk:Robin klein|talk]]) 18:12, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. If there is a "hard" blackout, providing access to relevant articles is a no-brainer. If it's a click-through/soft blackout, this is moot. [[User:Dcoetzee|Dcoetzee]] 18:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support''' -- this is a great idea because it would allow curious users to access more in-depth (and hopefully neutral{{=)|wink}}) material on SOPA, etc., in article form and with related [[WP:EL|ELs]] — Preceding ''signed'' comment added by [[User:Cymru.lass|Cymru.lass]] ([[User talk:Cymru.lass|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Cymru.lass|contribs]]) 01:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support''', but we might want to protect the articles as well. Otherwise it would be a great opportunity for vandalism (or even deliberate sabotage). [[Special:Contributions/208.65.89.236|208.65.89.236]] ([[User talk:208.65.89.236|talk]]) 02:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support''' - so far as '''''if the blackout happens''''' this would be a very reasonable way to show what indeed is happening. I think the whole idea of a blackout is incredibly stupid in the first place, but this is making a silk purse out of a sow's ear in my opinion. On a technical side, I'm not sure how many "exception" articles can be done in this way. They would be easy to manage though, and IMHO they should be hard protected (sysop only) for the duration of any such "blackout" as well if they are going to be made so public and the only articles on Wikipedia. --[[User:Robert Horning|Robert Horning]] ([[User talk:Robert Horning|talk]]) 02:42, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Suppot''', a logical approach. - [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] 06:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support''' per Dcoetzee --[[User:Gmaxwell|Gmaxwell]] ([[User talk:Gmaxwell|talk]]) 08:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. [[User:Kaldari|Kaldari]] ([[User talk:Kaldari|talk]]) 10:32, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. Already stated this in my remarks in other voting sections. [[User:Jurjenb|Jurjenb]] ([[User talk:Jurjenb|talk]]) 13:17, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support'''. Obvious and sensible. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens|talk]]) 14:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support''' – We shouldn't deny access to information. --[[User:Michaeldsuarez|Michaeldsuarez]] ([[User talk:Michaeldsuarez|talk]]) 14:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
*'''Support.''' Very good idea. [[User:Dkasak|Denis Kasak]] ([[User talk:Dkasak|talk]]) 15:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

'''Please make sure that the votes above are in addition to, not instead of, voting in the appropriate section. Thanks!''' --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 10:40, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== A stupid question =====

Just to be sure, will a full blackout mean that the website is replaced by an anti - SOPA message, or just that the site goes offline? If it's the former you have my full support with any form of blackout. Thanks. [[User:Aethersniper|Aethersniper]] ([[User talk:Aethersniper|talk]]) 18:24, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
* The former. It would make absolutely no sense to merely take the site offline - it would not create awareness. [[User:Dcoetzee|Dcoetzee]] 18:29, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Include a link to the IRC channel =====
If the likely event of a full blackout occurs, then I propose that we include a link to the English Wikipedia's IRC channel. We could use the IRC as a means for further updates on SOPA and the Wikipedia blackout. '''[[User:Fluttershy|Flutter]][[User talk:Fluttershy|shy]]''' ''[[Tripcode|!xmcuvg2MH]]'' 18:39, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
: Somehow I feel that flooding IRC with thousands and thousands of confused newbies is not the right approach to take. — [[User talk:Fox|Joseph '''Fox''']] 18:45, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
:: Then create a special channel specifically for the newbies. Obviously, they will be confused, and I feel that we should have a channel open for people to ask about certain elements of the SOPA and PROTECT IP acts. '''[[User:Fluttershy|Flutter]][[User talk:Fluttershy|shy]]''' ''[[Tripcode|!xmcuvg2MH]]'' 18:50, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
::: The very fact they will be confused is reason enough not to go ahead with this stupid plan. — [[User talk:Fox|Joseph '''Fox''']] 18:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
:: If a special channel were instituted, who would staff the channel and who would have chan-op powers in that channel? Would it be flooded with happy people who know what's going on, with people not needing help, would people with a strong opinion for/against show up and and want to rationally discuss? What would be the endgame of giving a link? Who would actually keep the channel from degenerating into pure incivility? As for #wikipedia-en, I'm unsure as to what the exact point would be of giving out a link...for SOPA-chat? And please don't send people to Help, on a normal day there are times when no Helpers are available, who exactly would volunteer to take on any possible civility-cop duties? --[[User:Shearonink|Shearonink]] ([[User talk:Shearonink|talk]]) 21:09, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
:Barring the fact that most readers have probably never heard of IRC before and won't understand what is happening, this would probably kill the servers. -- [[User:Luk|Luk]] [[User talk:Luk|talk]] 09:41, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
::The IRC link was useful when the italian language wikipedia went on strike. Some people joined it (it was a channel different from the one used by regulars) and there could be more explainations. If and only if the IRC network is disrupted or there aren't enough ops then you simply remove the link :-) --[[User:Lou Crazy|Lou Crazy]] ([[User talk:Lou Crazy|talk]]) 15:39, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

<del>
#'''Support strongly Global Full Blackout'''. [[User:Ricardo Oliveros Ramos|Ricardo Oliveros Ramos]] ([[User talk:Ricardo Oliveros Ramos|talk]]) 19:19, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
#'''Support strongly Global Full Blackout'''--[[User:Ivanpares|Ivanpares]] ([[User talk:Ivanpares|talk]]) 19:58, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
</del>

:'''Please place your votes in the appropriate section. They are likely to be uncounted if posted here.''' --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 21:21, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Make wikipedia home page and banner point to WP [[SOPA]] article, and invite research, citations, additions to, and work on (instead of a blackout) =====
Let's do what we do best: focus the attention of a legion of Wikipedians on writing the definitive treatment of [[SOPA]], what it says, what it means in general, what it means for Wikipedia, its perceived flaws, the arguments offered in favor of it, the arguments against, any alternatives, lists of groups favoring, lists of groups opposing, timelines, better ways to reach any valid policy objectives behind [[SOPA]] etc.

We're in favor of light, not darkness. Blacking out makes it about Wikipedia and power, and may add more heat than light. A month of focus makes it about [[SOPA]]. The news cycle, if they cover it, will cover the article, and the issue will be about what the issue should be: [[SOPA]]. --[[User:Ocdnctx|Ocdnctx]] ([[User talk:Ocdnctx|talk]]) 02:01, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

:'''Stronly Support''' The points against a blackout are strong. Millions of people around the world rely on Wikipedia and to have Wikipedia out for a day would be damaging to a lot of people's research. Just to point it out, not only is Wikipedia a great source of information, but it is a great source for external links for articles and websites on issues with a standard of quality that Google just doesn't have. We need to keep these doors open. Also, it must be global for all languages that have a SOPA page, this bill has reprecussions around the world because nine of the top ten of the world's most viewed webpages, Google, Youtube, Wikipedia, Facebook, Yahoo, Windows Live, Blogspot, Amazon, and Twitter are all American, leaving Baidu as the only non-American website in the top 5. To completely blackout would make learning about SOPA and other topics near impossible, and the information most Americans will get on this will not be from places with NPOV policies. Since 9 of the top 10 websites are based in the United States and will undeniably have parts censored by the American government to the entire world! By redirecting most languages on wikipedia.org to SOPA than the entire world will be able to know about this and the GOP will be in deep trouble. People then will hear about what is happening here and then can read about who supports and doesn't support the bills, which will protect Wikipedia. I promise everyone who reads this that if Wikipedia stands by and doesn't make sure everybody knows about this than Wikipedia will be censored for information about many countries and finding accurate information will become difficult in America. I agree that Wikipedia shouldn't take sides, but if Wikipedia will be destroyed than we cannot let them destroy the internet, we have to take a side because we will be harmed. Let freedom ring. [[User:Stidmatt|Stidmatt]] ([[User talk:Stidmatt|talk]]) 06:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

'''Support''' Yes, make wikipedia home page and banner point to WP [[SOPA]] article, and invite research, citations, additions to, and work on (instead of a blackout)! Recommend that the Wikipedia, the Wikiquote, etc. in all the languages carry the no-to-SOPA-banner for a certain time (could be for a certain week, or month). Try to have en.wikipedia's article on SOPA translated to as many languages as possible. -- I am not ''strongly'' opposed to a single blackout for a day or two (as a protest against SOPA), but I am afraid of a possible future inflation of "blackouts". Beware of that! It is OK with me if the Wikimedia Foundation takes sides every now and then, for instance, on legislation issues concerning free speech,the internet and ownership to information. It makes me glad to see this discussion about SOPA on the pages of Wikipedia. The Wikimedia needs to forge a stronger alliance with the libraries and their associations. If only the librarians would also discuss their tactics in common, and over the national borders, like the wikipedians! --[[User:Mikaelbook|Mikaelbook]] ([[User talk:Mikaelbook|talk]]) 09:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC) -- [http://www.districtdispatch.org/2012/01/pipa-sopa-and-open-act-quick-reference-guide/ "The ALA will continue to voice strong opposition to PIPA and SOPA, while further analysis of the OPEN Act is needed"] --[[User:Mikaelbook|Mikaelbook]] ([[User talk:Mikaelbook|talk]]) 09:13, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

'''Support''' During blackouts, keep the SOPA article available at all times, so at least users can be informed of what the blackout is all about. [[User:Jurjenb|Jurjenb]] ([[User talk:Jurjenb|talk]]) 12:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

'''Support''' Seems logical to me. [[User:PoizonMyst|PoizonMyst]] ([[User talk:PoizonMyst|talk]]) 14:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Policy dialectic forum =====
{{seealso|Relational dialectics|Wikipedia:SOPA initiative/Proposals workshop}}

Here's the idea: on top of the blackout page (in whatever form it does take), [[Wikipedia:SOPA initiative/Input|include a link]] to a single page where Wikipedians, readers and congressional staffers can post comments for discussion. The page would then either be held on-Wikipedia or on a Wikimedia Foundation site. On the page, people providing input would discuss work-around solutions, the why and how of SOPA's threat to the Internet, and compromise strategies. It would be especially valuable both for congressmen and seasoned readers of the encyclopedia to converse as this allows a direct channel of communication more presentable than e-mails or phone calls. On the main blackout page, we can outline Wikipedia's mission statement, its purpose and ideals and the importance of a free Internet. Of course this would also affect countries outside the US, but Wikipedia is fundamentally a global project, the Internet is a global service and the legal consequences of SOPA are global and far-reaching. During the duration of the blackout, the forum page serves as a compromise strategy on which disparate parties can either come to a consensus or put forth suggestions for communal input. It is important to get a wide range of perspectives on this that is both readable and pertinent so that policy makers can best take notice.

''My comments:''
:Wikipedia is an important free service to netizens worldwide, offering an indirect form of self-education for anyone who has the ability to access the Internet. Targeted removal of copyright infrigements, while helpful to copyright holders, may jeopardize the project as our current practice is to tag and remove known violations on-sight, and that currently does suffice. I recall a recent US Public Policy project involving universities, from which this suggestion takes much of its inspiration. Taken to the extreme, the consequences of SOPA are all too similar to a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack using legal mediums that could shut down much of the Internet. We should see by now that the Internet is not a service to take for granted, as the electricity grid becomes ever-more fragile. Yet the world wide web has triggered a veritable mass shift in the thinking of businesses worldwide, including the collapse of mainstream media circa 2009 (citation requested). While SOPA may be an effort to protect the American economy, it may certainly prove to be very inefficient, as it indirectly eliminates the legitimacy of some of the world's most popular websites, virtually destroying the online economy. Obviously, the old forms of online protest are not working. Instead of resorting to extreme ends that could hurt the reputation of the encyclopedia, a balanced approach consisting of collaboration from all sides is suggested.

:It may be possible to eliminate piracy, and moral to protect intellectual property online–but one can never copyright information, and once information is out there, it cannot be destroyed by any means. This is why it is important to protect the veracity of the Internet as a whole: Wikipedia by nature is a compilation of knowledge, found either on the Internet or on print sources. This occasionally leads to unintended infrigements, whether by copypasting too much content, linking to known copyright violations or directly reproducing work without permission. Impromptu solutions to these problems include removing copyright content on-sight, but extreme legal measures are likely to undermine the sharing of knowledge. Redistribution of information does not constitute theft, and it is not necessary that restrictions on piracy lead to eventual uncontrolled shutdown of many legitimate sites that run on a very simple basis: the collaboration and sharing of truth. While our policy is verifiability, our ultimate objective is to freely distribute what's known and approach that ideal of truth and veracity. While we aim to include reliable sources, sometimes we inadvertantly add a few links that turn out to be copyright violations. There is a real systemic risk for cascading failure when governments of one country are given the right to shut down numbers of websites globally that may be heavily inter-linked: this is a complex system. Policy must address its own unintended consequences, and this is why dialectic and collaboration are so important.

:I take some examples from the main SOPA initiative page.
{{Rquote|right|The Administration will only support legislation that avoids censorship of legal activity, '''allows innovation, and does not damage the architecture of the internet'''. The statement calls for '''stakeholders to provide input on new legislation''' to prevent and prosecute piracy originating outside of the U.S.|[[User:Slaporte (WMF)]], 20:43, 14 January 2012 (UTC)}}

<blockquote>As the foremost user generated web site in the world, '''Wikipedia should provide Congress with ideas, recommendations and feedback''' 
:—[[User:Jehochman]], 20:57, 14 January 2012 (UTC)</blockquote>

Here are some pros and cons of this approach, AFAICT. Please feel free to further comment, adding !votes and pro/con reasons. Please notify me in the event this discussion is moved elsewhere.

;Pros
*As a collaboration, this discussion would provide a coherent solution that considers all sides of the debate to be presented to Congress. If Wikipedia is to do some form of "petitioning", then this is our new collaborative petition.
*It is a new approach likely to garner more interest and attention - Wikipedia is a stakeholder in this decision.
*In addition to setting potential recommendations for SOPA, it is a potential outline for future means by which the encyclopedia can address similar issues as they arise. This can set a precedent that will be useful.
*The method integrates the collaborative nature of Wikipedia into discussion over the goals of the project onto the larger public spectrum.
*It does not conflict with any existing blackout proposal, and can be easily integrated into the design of the display page that may or may not block out access to Wikipedia articles.
*As a landmark point in Wikipedia's history, the proposed action, in some form, is more likely than not to take place, and more likely than not to gain outside attention. Allowing the silent majority to voice their opinion on this issue is a good remediation strategy.
*The action will make clear that the Internet is a precious resource prone to disruption as well as an effective communication and collaboration medium.
*Wikipedia draws together a record of past copyright legislation, so linking any of those articles may make clear any negative issues raised by this new law. Wide diversity of opinions is important for NPOV, as well that it is important to protect from indiscriminate legal action that opinions or inadvertant postings may bring.

;Cons
*The ''word'' Forum. [[WP:NOTFORUM|Wikipedia is not a forum]].
*The large disruption that the blackout will bring together with providing a vent for viewers of the message may flood the page with far too much information. It may become necessary that editors summarize, filter or compile the input and suggestions.
*Wikipedia is not inherently intended for advocacy or self-promotion.
*It might require a predetermined outline of some sort, as to guide decision makers into actual solutions and not some incoherent mess that nobody can read.
*The large volume of user net traffic to one editable page may crash the servers, as well as create large edit conflict jams.
*There is a chance that Congress will not read whatever results from the dialectic "petition".
*There is an inherent risk of [[groupthink]], and shunning of unpopular opinions.
*Realistically, my understanding of US policy is limited, but this is why we have an encyclopedia.

Please contribute further to this discussion. Proposal made: ~[[User:AstroHurricane001|AH1]] (''[[User_talk:AstroHurricane001|discuss]]!'') 02:29, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Small Suggestion =====
Heya, I went thru the page, read comments, and suggestions and I thought I'd suggest this:
* Since we may know what Wikimedia projects are most frequently accessed by Americans, those particular Wikipedias go offline with a full page banner protesting against SOPA on. T his only for the USA, and not for any other country, UNLESS of course, some other country supports this. --[[User:Rsrikanth05|Rsrikanth05]] ([[User talk:Rsrikanth05|talk]]) 09:03, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
::'''Support'''. (from the Netherlands) What they are doing is not ok, the world needs free internet, uncensored and everything (with a few exceptions, f.e. childporn) should be allowed without any bullshit like SOPA or even ACTA — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tomk1996|Tomk1996]] ([[User talk:Tomk1996|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tomk1996|contribs]]) 09:30, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
::This needs to be brought up at the other-language Wikipedias. Nothing decided here is binding upon them; they can choose to go full blackout, put up a supporting banner, do nothing, or anything in between, but any decision will have to be made quickly; we are now 13 hours away from the deadline that the Wikimedia foundation says they need so as to have time to act. --[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 10:48, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
::'''Support for going global''' The SOPA legislation will influence visitors from all over the world. Make it a worldwide action. But.... This is specified in section 2.2.1 if you want to go US-only or global. Please put your support in the appropriate category. [[User:Jurjenb|Jurjenb]] ([[User talk:Jurjenb|talk]]) 12:23, 16 January 2012 (UTC) (Canada/The Netherlands)
=====Banners for every Wikipedia Edition=====
SOPA affects every Wikipedia-Edition, so I think, we should have banners at every Wikipedia. We have prepared a banner, that can be used with the Site-Notice-Feature and an information site for the readers at the german Wikipedia. Both can be easily translated, the banner is here: [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Initiative_gegen_den_SOPA#aktuell_vorgesehene_Aktion], our information site is [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SOPA/Infoseite here]. --[[User:Liberaler Humanist|Liberaler Humanist]] ([[User talk:Liberaler Humanist|talk]]) 12:56, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
:'''Strongly Support''' Not much more to say. Every wiki should definately be bannered. [[User:PoizonMyst|PoizonMyst]] ([[User talk:PoizonMyst|talk]]) 14:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

===== Info for those who think US policies don't have an effect on other countries =====

U.S. Pressures Spain Into SOPA Style Law:

http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6224/196/

Wikileaks cables reveal US pressuring Canada on IP enforcement:

http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2011/05/wikileaks-cables-reveal-us-pressuring-canada-on-ip-enforcement.ars

The US pressures the EU to pass ACTA before the end of 2011

http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number9.4/us-pushes-acta-european-parliament

--[[User:Guy Macon|Guy Macon]] ([[User talk:Guy Macon|talk]]) 12:57, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

:I agree that US policies do have an effect on other countries, I am not sure who is arguing otherwise. But I also think that voters in other countries don't elect US Congress, and so there is little that they can do about it. Whether that's fair or not is a complex geopolitical question. :) But it is true. Therefore a US-only blackout is going to be about as effective in terms of actually impacting whether this thing happens or not, as a global blackout.--[[User:Jimbo Wales|Jimbo Wales]] ([[User talk:Jimbo Wales|talk]]) 15:44, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

[[Category:Non-talk pages that are automatically signed]]
[[Category:Internet censorship]]

Don S. Williams

2011-05-27T19:58:10Z

*SM*: /* Appearances */ +

{{Infobox person
| image = Don Williams.jpg
| imagesize = 100px
| caption = Don S. Williams
| birth_name = Donald William Schlit
| birth_date = {{birth date and age|1938|2|11}}
| birth_place = {{Flagicon|Canada}} [[Edmonton]], [[Alberta]]
| spouse = Sylvia Halyk ([[1959]] - [[1963]]) Divorced
Audrey Williams ([[1966]] - Present)
| years_active = 1957 – 2001
}}

'''Don S. Williams''' (born February 11, 1938) is a [[Vancouver]]-based Canadian producer, director, actor, choreographer, and writer.

== Biography ==
===Early life===
Williams was born '''Donald William Schlit''' in [[Edmonton, Alberta]]. He grew up in the small community of [[Stony Plain, Alberta]] - just west of Edmonton where he graduated from Memorial High School in 1955. From the age of twelve, he had a keen interest in the Film and Entertainment Industry.

===Career===
Williams started his career in 1957, at the age of 19, when he moved to the [[Alberta]]/[[Saskatchewan]] border town of [[Lloydminster]] and began working at the new [[CKSA-FM|CKSA]] radio station. In the following year (1958), Williams accepted a one-year contract at the CKRM radio station in [[Regina, Saskatchewan]]. As soon as that contract was up (in [[1959]] - exactly 365 days later), Don left for [[Brandon, Manitoba]] where he worked both as the sole Producer and Director at the local [[CKX-TV]] station and Artistic Director for the Brandon New World Theatre. He continued in these roles for the next four years, 3 months and 8 days.

In 1963, Williams landed a job as Staff Producer/Director at the CBC station (CBWT) in [[Winnipeg]]. He spent 15 and half years there: the first five at the CBC and the remainder working as a freelance director, producer, and writer. With the freelance work came a great deal of travel - a considerable portion of which was to [[Vancouver]]. One of his early opportunities as a freelancer was to work as the Director of the third and fifth episode of the then-new [[Canadian Broadcasting Corporation|CBC]] series, [[The Beachcombers]] - a show that would go on to be the longest running series in Canadian television history.

Since so much of his freelance work saw him travelling more and more to Vancouver (largely because of his growing involvement with The Beachcombers), in 1979 Williams decided to move his family to Vancouver. Over the ensuing years, Don continued to be involved with The Beachcombers in the capacities of director, producer, and executive producer. Additionally, he was involved in projects that saw him directing other notable people from the entertainment industry when they were at the early stages of their careers, such as [[Cameron Bancroft]], [[Chief Dan George]], [[Michael J. Fox]], and [[Bruce Greenwood]] (in both The Beachcombers and in 21 episodes of a 1979 live-to-tape comedy mini-series called "Dr. Bundolo". He has also worked as the director of the [[Royal Winnipeg Ballet]].

In 1991, Williams made a decision to focus more on acting citing that "the market is good for overweight middle-aged men." After appearing as a guest star in shows such as [[Wiseguy]], Mom P.I., [[The Commish]], and [[Neon Rider]], in [[1995]], Don landed the role that he would become best recognized for - appearing in the recurring role of [[List of The X-Files characters#First Elder|The First Elder]] on the hit [[Fox Broadcasting Company|Fox]] series [[The X-Files]]. He made regular appearances in that role until [[1999]] - including an appearance in ''[[The X-Files (film)|The X-Files Movie]]''. He also appeared in the films ''[[The Stepfather (1987 film)|The Stepfather]]'' and ''[[Reindeer Games]]''.

From 1968 to 1978 Williams also worked as the Chief Negotiator for [[collective bargaining]] agreements for the CTPDA (Canadian Television Producers and Directors Association) - an association of which he was one of the founders. During his time there, he became known as a "raving moderate."

===Political Involvement===
Williams started being interested in politics as a young child - getting much of his political awareness from his maternal grandfather (an Alberta Social Credit supporter). It was from his grandfather that Williams came to believe that, if you don't like the political situation, you have to get involved in the political system.

Williams joined the [[Liberal Party of Canada]] in 1965. He has worked on campaigns for the party both federally and provincially (in both Manitoba and British Columbia). In fact, Williams worked as the Director of Communications for the campaign of Izzy Asper in the 1973 Manitoba Election.

Locally, in North Vancouver, Williams has run (unsuccessfully) for the North Vancouver School Board the North Vancouver District Council.

===Personal life===
Williams has two children and two grandchildren.

In 1993, Williams was diagnosed with [[Parkinson's Disease]] – a degenerative disorder of the central nervous system. In March 2002, a small flurry of media interest erupted when it was revealed by documentary film-maker Gerry Thompson (for the Canadian broadcaster [[CTV Television Network|CTV]]) that Don was one of four people who worked together at the CBC in 1979 (the most famous being [[Michael J. Fox]]) who would all later go on to not only develop Parkinson's Disease, but to have the symptoms appear at roughly the same time (the early 1990s). Current evidence suggests that as many as eight crew and cast members on the project have developed Pakinson's symptoms.

This unusual coincidence led to the suggestion that Parkinson's may possibly have some sort of environmental trigger.

Thus, during the week of March 22–29, 2002, Williams and his doctor were interviewed by ''[[Good Morning America]]'', [[ABC News]], [[NBC News]], ''[[Entertainment Tonight]]'', ''[[Access Hollywood]]'', [[CNN]], ''[[People Magazine]]'', ''MacLean's Magazine'', CTV and ''[[The New York Times]]''.

===Director's Guild of Canada===
== Appearances ==
* ''[[Reindeer Games]]'' with [[Ben Affleck]] ([[2000]])
* ''[[The X Files]]''
** ''One Son'' ([[1999]])
** ''Two Fathers'' ([[1999]])
** ''The Beginning'' ([[1998]])
** ''The End'' ([[1998]])
** ''The Red and the Black'' ([[1998]])
** ''Patient X'' ([[1998]])
** ''Redux II'' ([[1997]])
** ''Redux'' ([[1997]])
** ''Zero Sum'' ([[1997]])
** ''Herrenvolk'' ([[1996]])
** ''Apocrypha'' ([[1996]])
** ''731'' ([[1996]])
** ''The Unopened File'' ([[1995]])
** ''Paper Clip'' ([[1995]])
** ''The Blessing Way'' ([[1995]])
* ''[[Fatal Memories]]'' with [[Shelley Long]] and [[Dean Stockwell]] ([[1992]])
* ''[[Mom P.I.]]''
:A Fugue for Mr. X ([[1991]])
* ''[[Neon Rider]]''
:Twist in the Wind ([[1991]])
* ''[[Wiseguy]]''
:Going Home ([[1988]])
* ''[[The Stepfather (1987 film)|The Stepfather]]'' ([[1987]])

==External links==
*{{imdb name|0930472|Don S. Williams}}
*{{tv.com person|17354|Don S. Williams}}

{{Persondata 
| NAME =Williams, Don S.
| ALTERNATIVE NAMES =
| SHORT DESCRIPTION =
| DATE OF BIRTH =February 11, 1938
| PLACE OF BIRTH = [[Edmonton]], [[Alberta]]
| DATE OF DEATH =
| PLACE OF DEATH =
}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Williams, Don S.}}
[[Category:1938 births]]
[[Category:Canadian film actors]]
[[Category:Canadian television actors]]
[[Category:Living people]]

[[fr:Don S. Williams]]

Iván Navarro (tennis)

2011-01-23T00:18:34Z

*SM*: wikification

{{Infobox Tennis player
|playername= Iván Navarro
|image=[[Image:Ivan-navarro.png|250px|center|Iván Navarro at the 2008 US Open]]
|country= {{ESP}}
|residence= [[San Vicente del Raspeig]], Spain
|datebirth= {{Birth date and age|1981|10|19}}
|placebirth= [[Alicante]], Spain
|height= {{height|m=1.83}}
|weight= {{convert|86|kg|lb st|abbr=on}}
|turnedpro= 2001
|plays= Right-handed (one-handed backhand)
|careerprizemoney= US$ 955,751
|singlesrecord= 31-54
|singlestitles= 0
|highestsinglesranking= No. 67 (March 2, 2009)
|currentsinglesranking= No. 138 (June 21, 2010)
|AustralianOpenresult= 1R ([[2009 Australian Open - Men's Singles|2009]])
|FrenchOpenresult= 2R ([[2007 French Open - Men's Singles|2007]])
|Wimbledonresult= 1R ([[2004 Wimbledon Championships - Men's Singles|2004]], [[2007 Wimbledon Championships - Men's Singles|2007]], [[2009 Wimbledon Championships - Men's Singles|2009]])
|USOpenresult= 2R ([[2009 US Open - Men's Singles|2009]])
|doublesrecord= 18-29
|doublestitles= 0
|highestdoublesranking= No. 127 (March 2, 2009)
|updated= April 12, 2010
}}
{{spanish name 2|Navarro|Pastor }}
'''Iván Navarro Pastor''' (born October 19, 1981, in [[Alicante]]) is a professional [[tennis]] player from Spain. He is sponsored by [[Head (company)|Head]] and [[Li Ning (company)|Li-Ning]] for his racquets and attire. He employs the [[serve-and-volley]] strategy, very much like his compatriot [[Feliciano López]]. He has a habit of changing racquets each game, using one racquet for serving and another for returning. He reached a career high singles ranking of 67 in March 2009.<ref>{{Cite web
| last =
| first =
| authorlink =
| coauthors =
| title = Player Statistics, Iván Navarro
| work =
| publisher = ATP World Tour
| date =
| url = http://www.atpworldtour.com/Tennis/Players/Na/I/Ivan-Navarro.aspx
| format =
| doi =
| accessdate = 2010-01-16}}
</ref>

==References==
<references/>

==External links==
* {{ATP|id=N309|name=Iván Navarro}}
* [http://steveghelper.com/MatchResults.php?players=Navarro-P&weeks=12 Navarro Recent Match Results]
* [http://steveghelper.com/RankingHistory.php?player=Navarro-P Navarro World Ranking History]

{{Persondata 
| NAME = Navarro, Ivan
| ALTERNATIVE NAMES =
| SHORT DESCRIPTION =
| DATE OF BIRTH = October 19, 1981
| PLACE OF BIRTH = [[Alicante]], Spain
| DATE OF DEATH =
| PLACE OF DEATH =
}}
{{DEFAULTSORT:Navarro, Ivan}}
[[Category:1981 births]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Spanish tennis players]]

{{Spain-tennis-bio-stub}}

[[ar:إيفان نافارو باستور]]
[[da:Iván Navarro]]
[[es:Iván Navarro Pastor]]
[[it:Iván Navarro]]
[[nl:Iván Navarro]]
[[pl:Iván Navarro]]
[[pt:Iván Navarro]]
[[ro:Iván Navarro]]
[[sk:Iván Navarro Pastor]]
[[th:อิบัน นาบาร์โร]]

Pierre Laurent (politician)

2010-08-18T19:16:20Z

*SM*: /* External links */ correction interwiki

{{Other persons}}
{{Infobox Politician
|image=Pierre-Laurent.jpg
|order=National secretary of the [[French Communist Party]]
|predecessor=[[Marie-George Buffet]]
|successor=
|term_start=20 June 2010
|term_end=
|order2=[[Île-de-France (region)|Île-de-France]] Regional Councillor
|term_start2=21 March 2010
|term_end2=
|birth_date={{Bda|1957|7|1}}
|birth_place=[[Paris]], [[France]]
|nationality=[[France|French]]
|party=[[French Communist Party|Communist]]
}}
'''Pierre Laurent''' (born July 1st, 1957 in [[Paris]]) is a [[France|French]] politician and journalist. Ex-director of ''[[L'Humanité]]'', he is currently head of the [[French Communist Party]] (PCF).

== Biography ==

His father, [[Paul Laurent]], was a member of the [[National Assembly of France]] for [[Paris]] and a main leader of the French Communist Party.

Pierre Laurent joined the [[Union of Communist Students]] (UEC) when he was studying [[economics]] in Paris. He was National Secretary of UEC from [[1982]] to [[1985]]. After graduating, he became a journalist for ''[[L'Humanité]]''. At first specialized in economic issues, he became chief editor in [[1999]], and managing editor in [[2000]].

He became a member of the [[French Communist Party]] National Council in [[2000]] (30{{st}} congress). He was the main writer of the 33{{rd}} Congress resolution in [[2009]], which he introduced. He was then nominated "national coordinator" (party's number 2), in charge of leading the party's collegial direction. He therefore resigned from ''L'Humanité''.

In 2010, he led the list for the [[Left Front (France)|Left Front]] (together with Alternative citoyenne, les Alternatifs and others) in [[Île-de-France (region)|Île-de-France]] for the [[French regional elections, 2010|French regional elections]]. He received 6,55% of the popular vote, way ahead of the [[New Anticapitalist Party]] (3,13 %) and of the [[Democratic Movement (France)|Democratic Movement]] (3,98 %).

Pierre Laurent was elected National Secretary of the [[French Communist Party]] in June 2010, replacing [[Marie-George Buffet]].

==External links==
{{commons|Pierre Laurent|position=left}}
* {{fr}} [http://www.pierrelaurent.org Pierre Laurent's website]

{{start box}}
{{s-off}}
{{succession box|
title=National secretary of the [[French Communist Party]]|
before=[[Marie-George Buffet]]|
after=Current incumbent|
years=2010-present
}}
{{end box}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Laurent, Pierre}}
[[Category:1957 births]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:People from Paris]]
[[Category:Politicians of the French Fifth Republic]]
[[Category:French Communist Party politicians]]

[[fr:Pierre Laurent (homme politique)]]

User talk:SM

2010-08-17T21:10:36Z

*SM*: Redirected to w:fr:User talk:Suprememangaka

User:SM

2010-08-17T21:10:25Z

*SM*: Redirected to w:fr:User:Suprememangaka

Tokyo Magnitude 8.0

2010-06-10T06:03:22Z

*SM*: /* External links */ interwiki

{{Article issues|article=December 2009|refimprove=November 2009|tooshort=November 2009|date=December 2009}}
{{Infobox animanga/Header
| name = Tokyo Magnitude 8.0
| image = [[File:Tokyo Magnitude 8.0 title.jpg|230px]]
| caption = Title card of the television series against a backdrop image of [[Tokyo Tower]] in ruins
| ja_kanji = 東京マグニチュード8.0
| ja_romaji = Tōkyō Magunichūdo 8.0
| genre = [[Drama]]
}}
{{Infobox animanga/Anime
| director = [[Masaki Tachibana]]
| writer = [[Natsuko Takahashi]]
| studio = [[Bones (studio)|Bones]], [[Kinema Citrus]]
| network = {{flagicon|Japan}} [[Fuji TV]] ([[noitaminA]])
| first = July 9, 2009
| last = September 17, 2009
| episodes = 11
| episode_list =
}}
{{Infobox animanga/Footer}}
{{nihongo|'''''Tokyo Magnitude 8.0'''''|東京マグニチュード8.0|Tōkyō Magunichūdo 8.0}} is a [[Japan]]ese [[anime]] [[television series]] that premiered on [[Fuji TV]]'s [[noitaminA]] timeslot on July 9, 2009, where it ended its original run on September 17. Directed by [[Masaki Tachibana]] and written by [[Natsuko Takahashi]], it is an original series that is being co-produced by [[Bones (studio)|Bones]] and [[Kinema Citrus]]. The 11-episode series centres around two young siblings, Mirai and Yūki, and the single mother Mari who the two meet in the aftermath of a major earthquake hitting the Japanese capital, placed in the near future (2012).<ref name="saishin">{{cite web|url=http://www.saiani.net/article/115837377.html|title=東京マグニチュード８.０』2009年7月より“ノイタミナ”他にて放送！|publisher=Saishin Anime Jōhō|date=2009-03-18|accessdate=2009-03-18}}</ref><ref name="ann1">{{cite web|url=http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2009-03-17/tokyo-magnitude-8.0-anime-to-air-in-japan-in-july|title=Tokyo Magnitude 8.0 Anime to Air in Japan in July|publisher=[[Anime News Network]]|date=2009-03-17|accessdate=2009-03-18}}</ref>

==Plot==
{{Expand|section|Needs a fuller plot summary that covers the major points of th series, including the ending|date=December 2009}}
After a massive [[earthquake]] in Tokyo 25 km under the sea at a magnitude of 8.0, siblings Mirai and Yūki, who were visiting a robot exhibition in [[Odaiba]] at the beginning of their summer vacation, struggle to reach their parents in their house in [[Setagaya, Tokyo|Setagaya]] assisted by a female motorcycle courier named Mari, who is striving to reach her own daughter and mother in [[Sangen-Jaya Station|Sangenjaya]]. While taking the journey home they encounter many problems caused by the earthquake, and meet others who have lost beloved ones due to the catastrophe.

==Characters==
* {{nihongo|Mirai Onozawa|小野沢未来|}} is a first-year middle school student who attends Rika Girls Academy, a prestigious and selective middle school. At the beginning of the series, she is unsure of what she wants to become later in life, but starts to change this outlook after the earthquake. {{Anime voices|[[Satomi Hanamura]]}}
* {{nihongo|Yūki Onozawa|小野沢悠貴|Ono}} is in his third year of elementary school and enthusiastic about [[robot]]s, has a somewhat distant relationship with his sister, and does not like to let others know when he is tired or ill. {{Anime voices|[[Yumiko Kobayashi]]}}
* {{nihongo|Mari Kusakabe|日下部真理}} is a motorcycle courier who assists Mirai and Yūki reach their parents' home after the earthquake happens. They make a promise to reach their home together.{{Anime voices|[[Yūko Kaida]]}}
* {{nihongo|Seiji Onozawa|小野沢誠司}}, Mirai and Yūki's father, is injured while at work when the earthquake occurs. {{Anime voices|[[Hiroshi Naka]]}}
* {{nihongo|Masami Onozawa|小野沢雅美}} is Mirai and Yūki's mother. The earthquake occurs on her birthday. {{Anime voices|[[Kikuko Inoue]]}}

==Development and production==
The series was first announced at the [[Tokyo Anime Fair|2009 Tokyo Anime Fair]], denoting that it would replace ''[[Eden of the East]]'' in [[Fuji TV]]'s [[noitaminA]] well-rated anime timeblock and would be co-produced by [[Bones (studio)|Bones]] and [[Kinema Citrus]].<ref name="saishin"/><ref name="ann1"/> The series' setting is based upon the [[earthquake prediction|prediction]] that there is 70% or higher chance of an earthquake measuring 7.0 magnitude on the [[Richter scale]] hitting Tokyo in the next 30 years, with the series illustrating the consequences of a 8.0 scale earthquake affecting the city.<ref name="saishin"/><ref name="ann1"/> Bones stated that it would try to realistically depict the after-effects of such a situation and that it would collect and tabulate research on previous earthquakes and interview individuals who were affected by them.<ref name="saishin"/><ref name="ann1"/>

The series features the efforts of the [[Japan Ground Self-Defense Force]], [[Japan Coast Guard]], [[Tokyo Fire Department]] and Tokyo Disaster Medical Assistance Team in assisting recovery efforts after the initial earthquake and its recurring [[aftershock]]s. [[Fuji News Network|FNN]] [[newscaster]] [[Christel Takigawa]] also features as a guest, reporting on the earthquake and assuming the role of a "navigator" during the series.<ref>http://mainichi.jp/enta/mantan/graph/anime/20090618/</ref>

==Media==
The series uses two pieces of theme music. {{nihongo|"Your Song"|キミノウタ|Kimi no Uta}} by [[Abingdon Boys School]] is used for the opening theme, while "M/elody" by [[Shion Tsuji]] is used for the ending

===Episode list===
{|class="wikitable" width="98%"
|-
! width="50"|# !! Title !! width="150"|Original air date
{{Japanese episode list
|EpisodeNumber = 01
|EnglishTitle = Odaiba Sinks
|KanjiTitle = お台場、沈む
|RomajiTitle = Odaiba, Shizumu
|OriginalAirDate = July 9, 2009
|ShortSummary = Mirai Onozawa and her younger brother Yūki are visiting a robot exposition at Odaiba, Tokyo, when a massive earthquake strikes the city.
}}
{{Japanese episode list
|EpisodeNumber = 02
|EnglishTitle = The World is Broken
|KanjiTitle = 壊れた、世界
|RomajiTitle = Kowareta, Sekai
|OriginalAirDate = July 16, 2009
|ShortSummary = After the earthquake Mirai looks desperately for Yūki inside a collapsing building along with Mari Kusakabe, a female motorcycle courier who offered to help her.
}}
{{Japanese episode list
|EpisodeNumber = 03
|EnglishTitle = Burning Bridge
|KanjiTitle = 燃える、橋
|RomajiTitle = Moeru, Hashi
|OriginalAirDate = July 23, 2009
|ShortSummary = Mirai, Yūki and Mari decide to reach their homes together, but just after starting their journey, they find that there are far more dangers in the collapsing city than they imagined.
}}
{{Japanese episode list
|EpisodeNumber = 04
|EnglishTitle = The Promise Between the Three of Them
|KanjiTitle = 三人の、約束
|RomajiTitle = Sannin no, Yakusoku
|OriginalAirDate = July 30, 2009
|ShortSummary = Having finally left Odaiba, the trio finds a place to gather supplies and prepare themselves for their long walk, but after having a discussion, Mirai and Yūki stray away from Mari and end up in serious trouble.
}}
{{Japanese episode list
|EpisodeNumber = 05
|EnglishTitle = The School is Wailing
|KanjiTitle = 慟哭の、学び舎
|RomajiTitle = Dōkoku no, Manabiya
|OriginalAirDate = August 6, 2009
|ShortSummary = The group takes shelter at her school's premises during the night, but their stay there becomes far from peaceful as they are constantly plagued by aftershocks and depressed by the sight of those who lost their relatives to the earthquake.
}}
{{Japanese episode list
|EpisodeNumber = 06
|EnglishTitle = Choice to Abandon
|KanjiTitle = 見捨てる、選択
|RomajiTitle = Misuteru, Sentaku
|OriginalAirDate = August 13, 2009
|ShortSummary = The group reaches Mari's workplace, where she loses consciousness because of anemia. During that time the kids are suddenly frightened by Aya, a colleague of Mari, who noisily enters the building carrying a baseball bat.
}}
{{Japanese episode list
|EpisodeNumber = 07
|EnglishTitle = Summer Evening Twilight
|KanjiTitle = 夏の夕暮れ
|RomajiTitle = Natsu no Yuugure
|OriginalAirDate = August 20, 2009
|ShortSummary = Rescue robots fill the scene, fascinating Yūki and leading him to meet a new friend, who shares his interest and is the same age as Mirai. However the journey so far seems to have taken its toll on Yūki.
}}
{{Japanese episode list
|EpisodeNumber = 08
|EnglishTitle = Pure White Morning
|KanjiTitle = まっしろな朝
|RomajiTitle = Masshiro na Asa
|OriginalAirDate = August 27, 2009
|ShortSummary = Yūki collapses suddenly and is taken to the hospital, where Mirai agonizes over her brother's fate.
}}
{{Japanese episode list
|EpisodeNumber = 09
|EnglishTitle = Goodbye To Today
|KanjiTitle = 今日、さよなら
|RomajiTitle = Kyō, sayonara
|OriginalAirDate = September 3, 2009
|ShortSummary = Mari finally reaches her home to find it was destroyed. Mirai and Yūki learn that residents are being cared for at a nearby elementary school. There, they find two unknown bodies that Mari believes are her mother and daughter, and mourns their deaths. However, Yūki believes they are still alive and with his sister, helps finds Mari's daughter at another school. After reuniting with her daughter, Mari finds her mother at a local hospital. Mirai and Yūki leave to continue their search for their parents. Mirai leaves Mari a note to thank her for all she did for them, stating that she hopes they will meet again. Confused and surprised, Mari says "Yūki and I?"
}}
{{Japanese episode list
|EpisodeNumber = 10
|EnglishTitle = Mirai, You Know...
|KanjiTitle = おねえちゃん、あのね
|RomajiTitle = Onee-chan, ano ne...
|OriginalAirDate = September 10, 2009
|ShortSummary = While on a truck going towards their hometown, Yūki tries to talk to Mirai about his death, but she tells him to quit talking nonsense as it would make her cry if he died. In their home town, Mirai runs into a friend some school who tells her that her parents are staying at one of the school shelters, and that her father was hospitalized from an injury. Yūki runs off when Mirai runs into his best friend Itsuki. Itsuki takes her to her parents, but finds that her mom has gone back to the house to get clothes for her father. Outside, they see the ''marronier'' Yūki and Itsuki had planted before the earthquake. Itsuki and Mirai return to his house to get a journal he wanted to give Yūki, while Yūki continues to avoid being seen by Itsuki. Half the house collapses while they are there. At the end of the episode, Yūki finally is able to tell Mirai that he died at the hospital earlier.
}}
{{Japanese episode list
|EpisodeNumber = 11
|EnglishTitle = Dear Yūki...
|KanjiTitle = 悠貴へ…
|RomajiTitle = Yuuki e...
|OriginalAirDate = September 17, 2009
|ShortSummary = Mirai and Yūki return home where Mirai is reunited with her parents and Yūki's spirit leaves. One month later, Tokyo is continuing to recover from the earthquake. Mari visits Mirai and returns her cell phone and Yūki's backpack. Mirai finds an email from Yūki that he sent before his death from Mari's phone saying that he hoped he could get a phone too so they could talk even when they were apart. Mirai gives her mother the present Yūki had purchased for her for the birthday. While watering the tree Yūki planted, Mirai resolves to move on with her life, knowing that Yūki will always be in her heart.
}}
|}

==References==
<references />

==External links==
*{{official|http://tokyo-m8.com/}}
*{{Ann|anime|10704}}

{{Noitamina}}

[[Category:Anime of 2009]]
[[Category:School anime and manga]]
[[Category:Bones (studio)]]
[[Category:Anime with original screenplays]]
[[Category:NoitaminA]]

[[ar:طوكيو ماغنيتود 8.0]]
[[de:Tokyo Magnitude 8.0]]
[[es:Tokyo Magnitude 8.0]]
[[fr:Tôkyô Magnitude 8.0]]
[[ko:도쿄 매그니튜드 8.0]]
[[it:Tokyo Magnitude 8.0]]
[[ja:東京マグニチュード8.0]]
[[zh:東京震級8.0]]

Anna Fárová

2010-03-06T19:21:31Z

*SM*: interwiki

'''Anna Fárová''' (June 1, 1928 - February 27, 2010) was a [[Czech Republic|Czech]] [[art historian]] who specialized and catalogued Czech and [[Czechoslovakia|Czechoslovakian]] [[photographers]], including [[Frantisek Drtikol]] and [[Josef Sudek]].<ref name=pdm> {{cite news|first=|last=|title=Art historian Fárová dies |url=http://praguemonitor.com/2010/03/02/art-historian-f%C3%A1rov%C3%A1-dies |work=[[Czech News Agency]]|publisher=[[Prague Daily Monitor]]|date=2010-03-02 |accessdate=2010-03-02}}</ref> She was one of the pioneers of writing on history of photography. Her publishing activities helped to establish photography as an art discipline within the country.

== Biography ==
Fárová was born in 1928 in [[Paris, France]], to a Czech diplomat, [[Miloš Šafránek]], and a [[France|French]] professor, Anne Moussu.<ref name=rp> {{cite news|first=Jan|last=Richter|title=Art historian Anna Fárová dies at 81 |url=http://www.radio.cz/en/article/125554 |work=[[Radio Prague]]|publisher=|date=2010-03-02 |accessdate=2010-03-02}}</ref> She spent a part of her early childhood in Paris, the family moved to [[Plzeň]], [[Czechoslovak Republic (1918–1938)|Czechoslovakia]] only in the middle of the 1930s.<ref>Fárová (2010), p. 19</ref> Following her studies at the [[French]] [[gymnasium (school)|gymnasium]] in Prague she continued studying art history and [[aesthetics]] at the Faculty of Arts of the [[Charles University in Prague]].<ref name="mfdnes">{{cite web|url=http://kultura.idnes.cz/zemrela-kunsthistoricka-anna-farova-ktera-zila-pro-fotografii-p7o-/vytvarneum.asp?c=A100301_101840_vytvarneum_jaz|title=Zemřela kunsthistorička Anna Fárová, která žila pro fotografii|date=2010-03-01|publisher=Mladá fronta DNES|language=Czech|accessdate=3 March 2010}}</ref><ref>Fárová began her studies at the [[Charles University]] in 1948. (Fárová (2010), p.40)</ref> In 1952, she married Czech artist [[Libor Fára]].<ref>Fárová (2010), p. 58</ref> In 1956, her father arranged a meeting with photographer [[Henri Cartier-Bresson]].<ref name=pdm/><ref name="novinky">{{cite web|url=http://www.novinky.cz/kultura/193491-zemrela-historicka-fotografie-anna-farova.html|title=Zemřela historička fotografie Anna Fárová|date=2010-03-01|publisher=Novinky.cz|language=Czech|accessdate=3 March 2010}}</ref> The meeting heavily influenced her career.<ref name=pdm/> She began working with Cartier-Bresson's [[Magnum Photos]] agency and published a series of monographs in the Czech publishing house [[Odeon (publishing house)|Odeon]].<ref name=pdm/>

She held a number of photo exhibitions across [[Prague]]. However, the Communist era Czechoslovakian government banned Fárová from working in the country after she became a [[signatory]] of the [[Charter 77]] [[manifesto]] in the 1970s.<ref name=pdm/> Much of her work was published outside of [[Czechoslovakia]] during the 1980s, before the [[Velvet Revolution]] and fall of [[communism]].<ref name=pdm/>

Anna Fárová died of a "serious illness" on February 27, 2010, at the age of 81.<ref name=pdm/><ref name=rp/>

==Notes==
{{reflist}}

== References ==
*{{cite book |title=A pásly by se tam ovce... |last=Fárová |first=Anna |authorlink= |coauthors=Stoilov, Viktor (ed.) |year=2010 |publisher=Torst |location=Prague |isbn=978-80-7215-387-9 |page= |pages= |url= |ref= }} {{cs icon}}

== Literature ==
*{{cite book |title=Anna Fárová - Dvě tváře |last=Stoilov |first=Viktor (ed.) |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=2009 |publisher=[[Torst (publishing house)|Torst]] |location=Prague |isbn=978-80-7215-369-5 |page= |pages= |url= |ref= }} {{cs icon}}

== External links ==
*[http://www.radio.cz/en/article/110106 Anna Fárová: a life in photography (Czech Radio)]
*[http://www.langhansgalerie.cz/en/vystavy-detail.php?vid=94 Anna Fárová (Gallery Langhans)]

{{CzechRepublic-artist-stub}}
{{art-historian-stub}}
{{photographer-stub}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Farova, Anna}}
[[Category:1928 births]]
[[Category:2010 deaths]]
[[Category:Czech art historians]]
[[Category:Czech photographers]]
[[Category:Charter 77 signatories]]
[[Category:Czechs of French descent]]

[[fr:Anna Fárová]]
[[cs:Anna Fárová]]

Kaoru Tada

2010-01-09T16:24:53Z

*SM*: /* External links */ interwiki

{{Nofootnotes|date=February 2008}}{{Infobox Comics creator
|name=Kaoru Tada 多田かおる
|image=
|imagesize=
|caption=
|birthname=
|birthdate=September 25, 1960
|location=[[Neyagawa, Osaka]]<ref>[http://tadakaoru.heteml.jp/page_profile_01.htm 多田かおるプロフィール]</ref>, [[Japan]]
|deathdate={{death date and age|1999|03|11|1960|09|25}}
|deathplace=
|nationality=Japanese
|area=Writer, Penciller, Inker
|alias=
|notable works= [[Itazura na Kiss]], [[Ai Shite Knight]]
|manga= Yes
|awards=
}}

{{nihongo|'''Kaoru Tada'''|多田かおる|Tada Kaoru}}, (September 25, 1960 - March 11, 1999) was a [[Japanese people|Japanese]] [[manga]] artist.

==Biography==
Tada made her debut in 1977, when still a high school student, on [[Shueisha]]'s "Deluxe Margaret" magazine. Tada's stories belong to the [[shōjo]] genre of [[manga]] and feature love stories centred around young female characters and their love interests. The storylines include comedic moments and are characterised by essential and sharp drawings.
Some of Tada's most popular works are ''[[Ai Shite Knight]]'', ''[[Itazura na Kiss]]'' and ''[[Kimi no na wa Debora]]''.

[[Ai Shite Knight]] portrays the Japanese rock music scene of the early 1980s. The [[anime]] series based on [[Ai Shite Knight]] was the first ever to feature original songs performed within the episodes. Another of Tada's works, [[Miihaa Paradise]] is also set in the [[rock 'n' roll]] world.

[[Itazura na Kiss]] (Mischievous Kiss) - begun in 1991 and never completed - was by far Tada's most successful work in [[Japan]]. It tells the love story between Kotoko and Naoki from high school until after their marriage. The series inspired also an illustrated art book and two novels written by [[Nori Harata]] and published in [[Shueisha]]'s "Cobalt" series. In 1996 a live action Japanese TV series based on [[Itazura na Kiss]] was also produced, starring [[Aiko Satō]] as Kotoko and [[Takashi Kashiwabara]] as Naoki. In 2005, the series was adapted into a Taiwanese drama under the name of [[It Started With a Kiss (TV series)|It Started With a Kiss]] and in 2008 an anime was also released.

Kaoru Tada died in 1999 of a [[cerebral hemorrhage]]. While moving to a new residence, she hit her head on a marble table and fell into a coma. Three weeks later, she died. She was 38.<ref>[http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/people.php?id=23313 Kaoru Tada - Anime News Network] (2008-07-08). Retrieved on 2008-07-16.</ref>

==List of manga==
*[[Ai Shite Knight]] (or Night), 愛してナイト, serialized in Margaret, 1981-83, 7 volumes
*[[Itazura na Kiss]] (Mischievous Kiss), イタズラなＫｉｓｓ, Margaret, 1991-, 23 volumes
*[[Itazura na Kiss Irasuto Shuu]], 多田かおるイラスト集イタズラなＫｉｓｓ, artbook published by [[Shueisha]], 1 volume
*[[Kawaii Ojisama]] (A Fine Dad), Margaret, 1 volume
*[[Kimagure Enjeru]] (Capricious Angel), きまぐれエンジェル, Margaret, 1 volume
*[[Kimi no Na wa Debora]] (Your name is Deborah), 君の名はデボラ, Margaret, 1988, 2 volumes
*[[Debora ga Raibaru]] (Deborah's the Rival), デボラがライバル, Margaret, 1996-1998, 4 volumes
*[[Sabishigariya no Deborah]], さびしがりやのデボラ, Margaret, 1 volume
*[[Horeru Yo! Koi]], Margaret, 1 volume
*[[Ai Shi Koi Shi no Manon!]], Margaret, 1 volume
*[[Kinta-kun ni Goyoujin!]], Margaret, 1 volume
*[[Tiinzu Burabo]] (Teens Bravo), Margaret, 1 volume
*[[Miihaa Paradise]] (Fans' Paradise), Margaret, 2 volumes
*[[High School Magic]], Margaret, 2 volumes

==References==
{{Reflist}}
*{{cite web
|url=http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1046938/
|title=Kaoru TADA
|publisher=[[IMDB]]
|language=English
|accessdate=2007-07-01}}

==External links==
*[http://tadakaoru.com Kaoru Tada Official Site] (in Japanese)
*[http://www.suki-desu.com/itazuranakiss/index.html Itazura na Kiss Fan Page]
*[http://www.nekobonbon.com/Autrici/Testi/Tada.htm Biographical information on Kaoru Tada] (in Italian)
*[http://niko-niko.net/random/miha.html About "Miihaa Paradise"]

{{DEFAULTSORT:Tada, Kaoru}}
[[Category:1960 births]]
[[Category:1999 deaths]]
[[Category:Manga artists]]
[[Category:Women comics artists]]
[[Category:Women comics writers]]
[[Category:People from Neyagawa]]

[[fr:Kaoru Tada]]
[[de:Kaoru Tada]]
[[es:Kaoru Tada]]
[[it:Kaoru Tada]]
[[ja:多田かおる]]
[[zh:多田薰]]

Masashi Ueda (manga artist)

2009-12-22T20:28:05Z

*SM*: /* External links */ interwiki

{{Notability|bio|October 2009|date=October 2009}}
{{Primary sources|October 2009|date=October 2009}}
{{nihongo|'''Masashi Ueda'''|植田まさし|''Ueda Masashi''|born 1947 in [[Tokyo]]<ref name="Kobovol2">''[[Kobo, the Li'l Rascal]]''. Volume 2 Bilingual. August 2001. [[Kodansha International]]. ISBN 4770026633, ISBN 978-4770026637. Cover inlet.</ref>}} is a comic book artist who wrote ''[[Kobo, the Li'l Rascal]]'' (''Kobo-chan'').

Ueda began drawing comic book strips when he worked in his brother's [[cram school]]. Ueda began producing ''[[Furiten-kun]]'', a comic book strip about a [[mahjong]] player, in 1979.<ref name="Kobovol2"/> In 1982 Ueda won the [[Bungeishunjū Manga Award]].<ref name="Kobovol2"/><ref>"[http://www.ztv.ne.jp/keiko/comic_lab/prize/bungei_shunju_mangasho.html 文藝春秋漫画賞]." [[ZTV (Japan)|ZTV]]. Retrieved on September 2, 2009. "・『フリテンくん』『まさし君』『かりあげクン』（植田まさし）"</ref> During that year he began producing ''Kobo, the Li'l Rascal''. In 1988, as part of the [[United Nations]] [[International Literacy Year]] he visited [[Nepal]] as a special commissioner. In 1999 the [[Japan Comic Artists Association]] awarded Ueda a prize.<ref name="Kobovol2"/>

==References==
{{reflist}}

==External links==
* {{ann|people|13443}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Ueda, Masashi}}
[[Category:Manga artists]]
[[Category:Living people]]

[[fr:Masashi Ueda]]
[[de:Masashi Ueda]]
[[ja:植田まさし]]

Johnny Hallyday

2009-12-20T13:57:57Z

*SM*: /* Career */

{{Infobox Musical artist 
| Name = Johnny Hallyday
| Img = Johnny hallyday (2003).jpg
| Img_capt = Johnny Hallyday in 2003
| Img_size =
| Landscape =
| Background = solo_singer
| Birth_name = Jean-Philippe Smet
| Alias =
| Born = {{Birth date and age|1943|6|15}}
| Died =
| Origin = Cité Malesherbes, [[Paris]], [[France]]
| Instrument =
| Voice_type =
| Genre = [[Rock and roll]]
| Occupation = Singer, actor
| Years_active = 1959–present
| Label = Warner Music, France
| Associated_acts =
| URL = http://www.johnnyhallyday.com/
| Current_members =
| Past_members =
| Notable_instruments =
}}

'''Johnny Hallyday''' (born '''Jean-Philippe Smet'''; 15 June 1943) is a French<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.lemonde.fr/cgi-bin/ACHATS/acheter.cgi?offre=ARCHIVES&type_item=ART_ARCH_30J&objet_id=1010056 |title=Johnny Hallyday renonce à la nationalité belge |publisher=''Le Monde'' |language=French |date=2007-10-22 |accessdate=2009-10-17}}</ref> [[singer]] and [[actor]].<ref>Hallyday - place/date birth [http://www.johnnyweb.fr/ Official site]</ref> An icon in the [[French language|French]]-speaking world since the beginning of his career, he was considered by some <ref>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1235348/Rock-legend-Johnny-Hallyday-coma-surgery.html</ref> to have been the French [[Elvis Presley]]. His father, named Léon Smet, was [[Belgians|Belgian]], but the young Hallyday got his stage name from his aunt's husband, American artist Lee Halliday (also a pseudonym).

Hallyday, whose music career has spanned a half-century, is one of France's biggest stars. He has completed 400 tours, had 18 [[platinum album]]s, performed in front of 25 million people, and sold more than 100 million records. Hallyday announced his retirement from performing on 3 December 2007 at the age of 64,<ref>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7124909.stm |title=Singer Hallyday to quit touring |publisher=BBC News |date=2007-12-03 |accessdate=2009-10-17}}</ref> after a farewell tour.

==Career==
Influenced by Elvis Presley and the 1950s rock revolution, Hallyday became famous in the 1960s for singing [[rock and roll]] in [[French language|French]]. His first album, ''Hello Johnny'', was released in 1960.<ref>[http://www.rfimusique.com/siteen/biographie/biographie_6309.asp Hallyday - influenced by Elvis Presley]</ref> He appeared on the American ''[[Ed Sullivan Show]]'' with American singing star [[Connie Francis]] in a show that was taped at the ''[[Moulin Rouge]]'' nightclub in Paris. He also staged many appearances in the [[Paris Olympia]] under the management of the late [[Bruno Coquatrix]].

Many {{Who|date=December 2009}} consider Hallyday to have developed well and become a greater performer in his later years, one of his concerts, ''100% Johnny: Live à La Tour Eiffel'' in 2000, attracted an audience of 500,000 and 9.5 million television viewers (the show was broadcast live on French TV).<ref name="Official site">http://www.johnnyweb.fr/ Official site</ref> In December 2005, Hallyday had his third number-one single in France, "[[Mon Plus Beau Noël]]" (after "[[Tous ensemble]]" and "[[Marie (song)|Marie]]"), dedicated to his adopted daughter Jade. Shortly before announcing his retirement from touring, he released a blues-flavored album, ''[[Le Cœur d'un homme]]'', on 12 November 2007. The album hit #1 in both France and French-speaking Belgium. In addition to the lead single "Always", ''Le Cœur d'un homme'' features "T'aimer si mal", a duet with bluesman [[Taj Mahal (musician)|Taj Mahal]] and "I Am the Blues", an English-language song written for Hallyday by [[U2]] frontman [[Bono]]. His next album, ''Ça ne finira jamais'', released in 2008, another #1 on the French album chart, and its lead single, "[[Ça n'finira jamais]]", also reached #1. Hallyday's most recent album, also a #1 hit in France, is ''Tour 66: Stade de France 2009'', a live set recorded at [[Stade de France]] during his farewell tour with appearences by Drexl Jonez on the guitar.

Hallyday remains largely unknown outside of France, thus earning the nickname "the biggest rock star you've never heard of" in English-speaking countries.[http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/go/tag/view/blog_post/Johnny%20Hallyday]<ref name=Independent>{{cite web|url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/le-fin-for-the-original-french-pop-idol-1684593.html|title=Le fin for the original French pop idol |publisher=''The Independent'' |date=2009-05-14 |accessdate=2009-10-17}}</ref> He was made ''Chevalier'' (Knight) of the [[Légion d'honneur]] in 1997.<ref name="jorf19970101">
{{Cite journal
|journal=[[Journal Officiel de la République Française|JORF]]
|volume=1997
|issue=1
|title=ORDRE DE LA LEGION D'HONNEUR Décret du 31 décembre 1996 portant promotion et
|date=January 01-1997
|page=29
|id=PREX9612816D
|url=http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/WAspad/UnTexteDeJorf?numjo=PREX9612816D
|accessdate=2009-04-05
}}
</ref>

==Performing history==
Hallyday hired [[Peter Frampton]] and the [[Small Faces]] to record on his 1969 album ''Rivière... Ouvre ton Lit.''
Amongst their contributions are the songs "Amen (Bang Bang)", "Reclamation (News Report)" and "Regarde Pour Moi (What You Will)" which are variations of Small Faces and [[Humble Pie]] tracks and they can be heard playing on the album. Often forgotten is Hallyday's non-LP single and EP track "Que Je T'aime" from the same sessions.<ref>[Frampton and Small Faces contribution on 1969 album.] [[Steve Marriott - All Too Beautiful...]] (Paulo/Hellier) ISBN 1900924447 p.324</ref> For their first concert, [[The Jimi Hendrix Experience]] opened for Johnny Hallyday in [[Évreux]] on October 13, 1966. Black and white footage, also from October, 1966, exists of Hallyday partying with Hendrix and his manager [[Chas Chandler]] and others.

Hallyday supported [[Nicolas Sarkozy]] in the [[2007 French presidential election]]. In an ironic twist, when the Canadian comedy duo the [[Masked Avengers]] [[The Masked Avengers' prank on Sarah Palin|prank-called]] American vice-presidential nominee [[Sarah Palin]] by pretending to be Sarkozy, they named Hallyday as Sarkozy's "Special American Advisor."

In 2008 he recorded a series of acoustic songs with French musician [[Drexl Jonez]].

==Personal life==
In [[November]] [[2005]], Hallyday started a procedure to obtain Belgian citizenship but his request was turned down in 2006 because he failed to fulfill the residency requirements. In late 2006, Hallyday announced that he would move his permanent residency to [[Gstaad]], [[Switzerland]] to escape the high tax rate imposed by the French government. Swiss law allows wealthy individuals to claim residency if they live six months and one day in the country and then pay a fixed tax based on expenses, such as rent or assets in Switzerland, rather than a percentage of their income. Hallyday has said that he would move his residency back to France if it changes its tax laws.<ref>BBC - http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/6190133.stm</ref>

Hallyday keeps a second home in [[Los Angeles]], where he has been spending increasing amounts of time in recent years, enjoying his relative anonymity in the U.S. One of his favorite leisure activities is riding his [[Harley-Davidson]] on long trips through the California desert, staying in small motels along the way.<ref name=Independent/>

Hallyday married French singer [[Sylvie Vartan]] on April 12, 1965. Their son [[David Hallyday]] was born on August 14, 1966. Hallyday and Vartan divorced in [[1980]]. He then briefly married Babeth Etienne; the marriage lasted less than three months, ending in [[February]] [[1982]]. A four year relationship with French actress [[Nathalie Baye]] followed, with their daughter [[Laura Smet]] being born on November 15, 1983. He was married to his third wife Adeline Blondieau for two years, divorcing her in [[1992]]. He has been married to Laeticia Boudou since March 25, 1996. The couple adopted a girl from [[Vietnam]], whom they named Jade, in [[2004]].<ref>http://www.nndb.com/people/120/000111784/</ref>

In late 2009 Hallyday underwent surgery in Paris to repair a herniated disk, but he suffered complications and was admitted to [[Cedars-Sinai Medical Center]] in [[Los Angeles]]. It was announced that Hallyday had been put into a medically induced coma in order to repair lesions that had formed as a result of the surgery and to relieve his pain. On [[December 17]], it was announced that Hallyday and his wife had started legal proceedings against Dr. Stephane Delajoux, who had performed the original surgery.<ref>http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/wireStory?id=9360871</ref>

==Albums==
===Studio albums===
* ''Hello Johnny'' (1960, Vogue)
* ''Nous les Gars, Nous les Filles'' (1961, Vogue)
* ''Tête à Tête avec Johnny'' (1961, Vogue)
* ''Salut les Copains!'' (1961, Philips)
* ''Johnny Hallyday sings America's Rockin' Hits'' (1962, Philips)
* ''Les Bras en Croix'' (1963, Philips)
* ''Les Rocks les Plus Terribles'' (1964, Philips)
* ''Halleluyah'' (1965, Philips)
* ''Johnny Chante Hallyday'' (1965, Philips)
* ''La Génération Perdue'' (1966, Philips)
* ''Johnny 67'' (1967, Philips)
* ''Jeune Homme'' (1968, Philips)
* ''Rêve et Amour'' (1968, Philips)
* ''Rivière... Ouvre ton Lit'' (1969, Philips)
* ''Vie'' (1970, Philips)
* ''Flagrant Délit'' (1971, Philips)
* ''Country-Folk-Rock'' (1972, Philips)
* ''Insolitudes'' (1973, Philips)
* ''Je t'Aime, Je t'Aime, Je t'Aime'' (1974, Philips)
* ''Rock'n Slow'' (1974, Philips)
* ''Rock à Memphis'' (1975, Philips)
* ''La Terre Promise'' (1975, Philips)
* ''Derrière l'Amour'' (1976, Philips)
* ''Hamlet'' (1976, Philips)
* ''C'est la Vie'' (1977, Philips)
* ''Solitudes à Deux'' (1978, Philips)
* ''Hollywood'' (1979, Philips)
* ''À Partir de Maintenant...'' (1980, Philips)
* ''En Pièces Détachées'' (1981, Philips)
* ''Pas Facile'' (1981, Philips)
* ''Quelque Part un Aigle'' (1982, Philips)
* ''La Peur'' (1982, Philips)
* ''Entre Violence et Violon'' (1983, Philips)
* ''Hallyday 84: Nashville en Direct'' (1984, Philips)
* ''En V.O.'' (1984, Philips)
* ''Rock'n'Roll Attitude'' (1985, Philips)
* ''Gang'' (1986, Philips)
* ''[[Cadillac (album)|Cadillac]]'' (1989, Philips)
* ''[[Ça ne change pas un homme]]'' (1991, Philips)
* ''[[Rough Town]]'' (1994, Philips)
* ''[[Lorada]]'' (1995, Philips)
* ''[[Ce que je sais]]'' (1998, Philips)
* ''[[Sang pour sang]]'' (1999, Philips)
* ''[[À la vie, à la mort !]]'' (2002, Mercury)
* ''[[Ma Vérité]]'' (2005, Mercury)
* ''[[Le Cœur d'un homme]]'' (2007, Warner Music France)
* ''Ça ne finira jamais'' (2008, Warner Music France)

===Live albums===
* ''Johnny et Ses Fans au Festival de Rock'n'Roll'' (1961, Vogue)
* ''À l'Olympia'' (1962, Philips)
* ''Olympia 64'' (1964, Philips)
* ''Olympia 67'' (1967, Philips)
* ''Au Palais des Sports'' (1967, Philips)
* ''Que Je t'Aime'' (1969, Philips)
* ''Live at the Palais des Sports'' (1971, Philips)
* ''Palais des Sports'' (1976, Philips)
* ''Pavillon de Paris'' (1979, Philips)
* ''Live'' (1981, Universal Music)
* ''Palais des Sports 1982'' (1982, Universal Music)
* ''Au Zénith'' (1984, Universal Music)
* ''À Bercy'' (1987, Universal Music)
* ''Dans la Chaleur de Bercy'' (1990, Universal Music)
* ''Bercy 92'' (1992, Universal Music)
* ''Parc des Princes'' (1993, Universal Music)
* ''À La Cigale'' (1994, Universal Music)
* ''Lorada Tour'' (1995, Universal Music)
* ''Destination Vegas'' (1996, Universal Music)
* ''Johnny Allume le Feu: Stade de France 98'' (1998, Universal Music)
* ''100% Johnny: Live à La Tour Eiffel'' (2000, Universal Music)
* ''Olympia 2000'' (2000, Universal Music)
* ''Parc des Princes 2003'' (2003, Universal Music)
* ''Flashback Tour Live'' (2006, Warner Music)
* ''La Cigale'' (2007, Warner Music)
* ''Tour 66: Stade de France 2009'' (2009, Warner Music)

==Films==
* ''[[L'aventure c'est l'aventure]]'' (1974) as himself
* ''[[Détective]]'' (1985) directed by [[Jean-Luc Godard]]
* ''[[Why Not Me? (film)|Why Not Me?]]'' (1999) as José
* ''[[Love Me (2000 film)|Love Me]]'' (2000) as Lennox
* ''[[L'homme du train]]'' (''[[The Man on the Train]]'') (aka ''[[Man on the Train]]'' in the [[United States|US]]) (2002) as Milan
* ''[[Crime Spree]]'' (2003) as Marcel Burot
* ''[[Crimson Rivers II: Angels of the Apocalypse]]'' (2004) as L'ermite borgne
* ''[[Quartier V.I.P.]]'' (2005) as Alex
* ''[[Jean-Philippe (film)|Jean-Philippe]]'' (2006) as Jean-Philippe
* ''[[Vengeance (2009 film)|Vengeance]]'' (2009) as François Costello
* ''[[The Pink Panther 2]]'' (2009) as Laurence Millikin

== See also ==
* [[List of best-selling music artists]]

==References==
{{Reflist}}

==External links==
*{{fr icon}} [http://www.johnnyhallyday.com/ Official site]
*{{fr icon}} [http://www.atoutjohnny.com/ The Best Site on Johnny Hallyday in France]
*{{fr icon}} [http://www.hallyday.com.fr/ First site about Johnny Hallyday]
*[http://www.rfimusique.com/siteen/biographie/biographie_6309.asp Biography of Johnny Hallyday], from [[Radio France Internationale]]
* {{imdb name|name=Johnny Hallyday|id=0002776}}
*{{fr icon}} [http://www.dhnet.be/index.phtml?content=http://www.dhnet.be/dhinfos/index.phtml DH website] - a Belgian paper
*{{fr icon}} [http://www.johnnypassion.com/ Johnny et la passion de ses fans]
*{{fr icon}} [http://www.oositoo.com/annuaire-web/johnny-hallyday-p1-607.html French Directory for Johnny]
*[http://www.jiwa.fr/Johnny-Hallyday-1288.html Listen to Johnny Hallyday's discography]
{{start box}}
{{succession box|before=[[Jean-Jacques Goldman]]|title=[[Victoires de la Musique]] [[Victoires de la Musique#Male artist of the year|Male artist of the year]]|years=1987|after=[[Claude Nougaro]]}}
{{end box}}

{{Johnny Hallyday}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Hallyday, Johnny}}
[[Category:1943 births]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:People from Paris]]
[[Category:Chevaliers of the Légion d'honneur]]
[[Category:French film actors]]
[[Category:French male singers]]
[[Category:French television actors]]
[[Category:Mercury Records artists]]
[[Category:French rock singers]]

[[br:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[bg:Джони Холидей]]
[[ca:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[cs:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[cy:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[da:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[de:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[es:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[eo:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[fa:جانی هلیدی]]
[[fr:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[ga:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[gan:焦尼·阿利得]]
[[io:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[id:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[it:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[he:ג'וני האלידיי]]
[[ms:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[nl:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[ja:ジョニー・アリディ]]
[[pl:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[pt:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[ro:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[ru:Джонни Халлидей]]
[[fi:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[sv:Johnny Hallyday]]
[[tr:Johnny Hallyday]]

Fumiya Satō

2009-12-07T20:43:42Z

*SM*: interwiki

{{nihongo|'''Fumiya Satō'''|さとう　ふみや|Satō Fumiya|original name: 佐藤文子 ''Satō Ayako'', born 22 December 1965 in [[Omiya, Saitama|Omiya]], [[Saitama Prefecture|Saitama]], [[Japan]]}} is a [[Japan]]ese [[mangaka|manga artist]]. She is best known for the manga series ''[[Kindaichi Case Files|Kinda'ichi Case Files]]'' and ''[[Detective School Q]]''. In 1995, she received the [[Kodansha Manga Award]] for her work on ''Kinda'ichi Case Files''.<ref name="KodanshaHahn">{{cite web | url=http://www.hahnlibrary.net/comics/awards/kodansha.shtml | author=Joel Hahn | title=Kodansha Manga Awards | work=Comic Book Awards Almanac | accessdate=2007-08-21}}</ref>

== References ==
{{reflist}}

== External links ==
* {{ann person|id=42902}}
* [http://users.skynet.be/mangaguide/au1662.html Profile at The Ultimate Manga Page]

{{DEFAULTSORT:Sato, Fumiya}}
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:1965 births]]
[[Category:Winner of Kodansha Manga Award (Shōnen)]]
[[Category:People from Saitama (city)]]

{{Japan-artist-stub}}
{{manga-artist-stub}}

[[fr:Fumiya Satô]]
[[ja:さとうふみや]]
[[zh:佐藤文也]]

Motoka Murakami

2009-11-24T13:54:43Z

*SM*: interwiki

{{Expand Japanese|topic=manga|村上もとか|date=February 2009}}
{{nihongo|'''Motoka Murakami'''|村上もとか|Murakami Motoka|born [[June 3]], [[1951]] in [[Setagaya, Tokyo]]}} is a [[Japanese people|Japanese]] [[manga artist]] who writes primarily [[shōnen]] manga. He won the [[Kodansha Manga Award]] for shōnen for ''[[Gakuto Retsuden]]'' in 1982 and the [[Shogakukan Manga Award]] twice, for shōnen for ''[[Musashi no Ken]]'' in 1984 and for general manga for ''Ron'' in 1996.<ref name="KodanshaHahn">{{cite web | url=http://www.hahnlibrary.net/comics/awards/kodansha.shtml | author=Joel Hahn | title=Kodansha Manga Awards | work=Comic Book Awards Almanac | accessdate=2007-08-21}}</ref><ref name="ShogakukanAward">{{cite web | url=http://comics.shogakukan.co.jp/mangasho/rist.html | title=小学館漫画賞：歴代受賞者 | publisher=Shogakukan | language=Japanese | accessdate=2007-08-19}}</ref> In 1998, he received an Excellence Prize at the [[Japan Media Arts Festival]] for ''Ron''.<ref name="japanmediaarts">{{cite web | url=http://plaza.bunka.go.jp/english/festival/1998/ | title=1998[2nd]Japan Media Arts Festival | JAPAN MEDIA PLAZA | publisher=[[Japan Media Arts Festival]] | language=English | accessdate=2008-06-24}}</ref>

== References ==
{{reflist}}

== External links ==
* [http://www.roy.hi-ho.ne.jp/motoka/ Official Website] {{ja icon}}
* {{ann person|id=50644}}
* [http://users.skynet.be/mangaguide/au1244.html Profile] at The Ultimate Manga Guide

{{DEFAULTSORT:Murakami, Motoka}}
[[Category:1951 births]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Manga artists]]
[[Category:Winner of Kodansha Manga Award (Shōnen)]]
[[Category:People from Tokyo]]
[[Category:Manga articles needing translation from Japanese Wikipedia]]

{{manga-artist-stub}}

[[fr:Motoka Murakami]]
[[ja:村上もとか]]
[[zh:村上紀香]]

Maki Murakami

2009-11-23T22:46:08Z

*SM*: interwiki

{{BLP unsourced|date=June 2009|bot=yes}}
{{Infobox Person
| name = Maki Murakami
| image =
| image_size =
| caption =
| birth_name =
| birth_date =
| birth_place =
| death_date =
| death_place =
| death_cause =
| nationality = [[Japanese people|Japanese]]
| residence =
| known_for = ''[[Gravitation (manga)|Gravitation]]''
| occupation = [[mangaka|Manga artist]]
| website =
}}

{{nihongo|'''Maki Murakami'''|村上真紀|Murakami Maki}} is a [[Japanese people|Japanese]] [[mangaka|manga artist]] most famous for the [[boys love]] manga ''[[Gravitation (manga)|Gravitation]]'', which, in addition to the ''Gravitation'' novel, is published by in the U.S. by [[TOKYOPOP]]. [[TOKYOPOP]] also has ''[[Kanpai!]]'' licensed. Gravitation was the first BL to have broken into mainstream leading way for the overwhelming popularity of yaoi/shounen-ai today. There are twelve volumes currently available; and she is continuing the series with Gravitation EX(which is also licensed by [[TOKYOPOP]]),there are also two novels (one of which is written by Murakami herself). She also has written several issues of [[yaoi]] [[doujinshi]], published by her doujinshi circle; Crocodile Avenue. (Not actually published, it can only be purchased through doujinshi carriers & CA's website). ''Rimigra'' aka ''Remix Gravitation'' is the most popular and consists of sexual content but of quite a mild nature, unlike ''Megamix Gravitation'', which is very explicit and detailed. ''Gravitation'' was so successful it has its own [[anime]] series, which consists of 13 episodes as well as two "Lyrics of Love" [[OVA]]s. She has created other manga, but ''Gravitation'' is the most famous.

Maki Murakami has continued the ''Gravitation'' series with ''Gravitation EX'', which has also been licensed by [[TOKYOPOP]]. ''Gravitation EX'' only consists of 1 volume in English and 5 volumes in Japanese. It is reported that the remaining Japanese volumes will not be translated until Maki Murakami picks up her pen and continues writing ''Gravitaion EX'', which many loyal fans hope she will.

Her latest work is ''[[Gamerz Heaven]]'', which includes 4 volumes in Japan. It is currently licensed by ADV Films in America.

She is one of many manga artists who draws her own doujinshi including Gravitation Remix 1-12, Gravitation Megamix EST, Gravitation Megamix Panda, Gravitation Megamix Kumagoro, Gravitation Megamix Capybara, Kanpai! DJ - Unapai, Gamerz Heaven DJ - Director's Cut, and much more.

==Trivia==
{{Trivia|date=February 2008}}
She is shy of being photographed, as it was reported on the [[Otakon]] 2007 website, where it is stated that "''A condition of her visit is that there be no photographs taken of her while she's at Otakon''".

{{DEFAULTSORT:Murakami, Maki}}
[[Category:Year of birth missing (living people)]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Manga artists]]
[[Category:Women comics artists]]

{{manga-artist-stub}}

[[fr:Maki Murakami]]
[[de:Maki Murakami]]
[[es:Maki Murakami]]
[[ja:村上真紀]]
[[zh:村上真紀]]

Shirow Miwa

2009-11-21T20:47:42Z

*SM*:

{{Infobox Comics creator
| name = Shirow Miwa 三輪士郎
| image =
| imagesize =
| caption =
| birthname =
| birthdate = {{birth date and age|1978|11|09}}
| location = [[Toyama, Toyama|Toyama]], [[Toyama Prefecture]], [[Japan]]
| deathdate =
| deathplace =
| nationality = Japanese
| area = [[Characterisation|Character design]], [[Writer]], [[Mangaka|Manga artist]]
| alias =
| notable works = ''[[Dogs: Bullets & Carnage]]''
| awards =
| manga = Yes
| website = http://mmm-gee.net/
}}

{{nihongo|'''Shirow Miwa'''|三輪士郎|Miwa Shirō|extra=born [[November 9]], [[1978]]}} is a [[Japanese people|Japanese]] [[mangaka]] and [[illustrator]]. He is best known as the writer and artist for the ''Dogs'' manga series, but has also contributed illustrations to various tribute books, and magazines, including [[Square Enix]]'s [[Gangan Comics#Monthly Shōnen Gangan|Monthly Shōnen Gangan]]. Miwa sometimes publishes under the circle name of '''m.m.m. + Gee'''.

== Works ==
Shirow's debut manga, ''Black Mind'', a short series created in collaboration with Darai Kusanagi, was serialized in [[Ultra Jump]] in 1999,<ref name="BlackMind">{{cite web|url=http://www.amazon.com/dp/1421527022|title=Dogs: Prelude, Volume 0: Shirow Miwa: Books|publisher=[[Amazon.com]]|accessdate=2009-06-17}}</ref> and was followed by his first solo series, ''Dogs'', which was serialized from 2000 to 2001.<ref name="Dogs200">{{cite web|url=http://ultra.shueisha.co.jp/contents/log/html/200011.html|title=BACK NUMBERS 2000年11月号|publisher=[[Shueisha]]|accessdate=2009-03-28}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://ultra.shueisha.co.jp/contents/log/html/200107.html?keepThis=true&TB_iframe=true&height=600&width=560|title=BACK NUMBERS 2001年7月号|publisher=[[Shueisha]]|accessdate=2009-03-28}}</ref> The sequel, ''Dogs: Bullets & Carnage'', began serialization in 2005.<ref name="Bullets&Carnage">{{cite web|url=http://ultra.shueisha.co.jp/contents/log/html/200507.html|title=BACK NUMBERS 2005年7月特大号|publisher=[[Shueisha]]|accessdate=2009-03-28}}</ref> In August 2008, the ''Dogs'' prequel and sequel were announced to have been licensed by [[Viz Media]]; ''Dogs'' was subsequently released in April 2009 as ''Dogs, Volume 0: Prelude'' using the ''Bullets & Carnage'' logo.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2008-07-25/viz-media-picks-up-miwa-dogs-mase-ikigami-manga|title=Viz Media Picks Up Miwa's ''Dogs'', Mase's ''Ikigami'' Manga|publisher=[[Anime News Network]]|date=2008-07-25|accessdate=2008-08-06}}</ref>

=== Publications ===
*''Black Mind''<ref name="BlackMind"/>
*''Dogs''<ref name="Dogs200"/>
*''[[Dogs: Bullets & Carnage]]''<ref name="Bullets&Carnage"/>

==References==

{{Reflist}}

==External links==
* {{ann|people|id=41715}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Miwa, Shirow}}
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:People from Toyama (city)]]
[[Category:Manga artists]]
[[Category:1978 births]]

{{manga-artist-stub}}

[[fr:Shirow Miwa]]
[[ja:三輪士郎]]
[[pl:Shirow Miwa]]

Shirow Miwa

2009-11-21T20:46:50Z

*SM*: interwiki

Kou Fumizuki

2009-11-02T23:36:01Z

*SM*: interwiki

{{BLP unsourced|date=June 2009|bot=yes}}
{{Infobox Writer 
|image = Replace this image male.svg 
|imagesize = 150px |
| name = Kou Fumizuki
| caption =
| pseudonym =
| birthdate = March, 8th 
| birthplace = [[Fukuoka Prefecture]], [[Japan]]
| deathdate =
| deathplace =
| occupation = [[Mangaka]]
| nationality = [[Japanese people|Japanese]] {{flagicon|Japan}}
| period =
| genre = [[fiction]]
| subject =
| movement =
| influences =
| influenced =
| website =
}}
'''Kou Fumizuki''' (文月晃 ''Fumizuki Kō'') is a Japanese [[mangaka]] who was born in [[Fukuoka Prefecture]]. Fumizuki's most famous work to date is ''[[Ai Yori Aoshi]]'', a 17-volume work which has been turned into an anime series. His current work is ''[[Umi no Misaki]]'', serialized in Young Animal Magazine starting 5th issue of 2007.

==Personal facts==
*Fumizuki's birthday is on 8 March.

==External links==
* [http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/people.php?id=5594 Kou FUMIZUKI] at [[Anime News Network]]
* [http://www.little-cotton.com/ little-cotton] (japanese)

{{DEFAULTSORT:Fumizuki, Kou}}
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Manga artists]]
[[Category:People from Fukuoka Prefecture]]

{{Manga-artist-stub}}

[[fr:Kô Fumizuki]]
[[ca:Kou Fumizuki]]
[[es:Kou Fumizuki]]
[[ja:文月晃]]

Tsubasa Fukuchi

2009-11-02T23:09:29Z

*SM*: interwiki

{{BLP unsourced|date=July 2009|bot=yes}}
{{Infobox Person
| image = Replace this image male.svg 
| image_size = 150px |
| name = Tsubasa Fukuchi
| caption =
| birth_name =
| birth_date = {{Birth date and age|1980|2|7|mf=y}}
| birth_place =
| death_date =
| death_place =
| death_cause =
| nationality = [[Japanese people|Japanese]]
| residence =
| known_for = ''[[The Law of Ueki]]''
| occupation = [[mangaka|Manga artist]]
| website =
}}

{{nihongo|'''Tsubasa Fukuchi'''|福地翼|Fukuchi Tsubasa|born [[February 7]], [[1980]]}} is a [[Japanese people|Japanese]] [[mangaka|manga artist]] best known for creating ''[[The Law of Ueki]]'' and its sequel, ''[[The Law of Ueki Plus]]''. His most current manga ''[[Takkoku!!!]]'' debuted in [[March]] [[2009]] in [[Shonen Sunday Super]].

==Early Life==
Tsubasa Fukuchi was born in [[Tochigi]], north of Tokyo. He won his first prize with 'Kôderi' at a Manga College contest. He began his professional career in 2001 with '[[The Law of Ueki]]'.

{{DEFAULTSORT:Fukuchi, Tsubasa}}
[[Category:1980 births]]
[[Category:Living people]]
[[Category:Manga artists]]

{{manga-artist-stub}}

[[fr:Tsubasa Fukuchi]]
[[ja:福地翼]]
[[zh:福地翼]]

Richard Easterlin

2009-10-28T21:19:55Z

*SM*: interwiki

{{BLP unsourced|date=August 2009|bot=yes}}
'''Richard A. Easterlin''' is University Professor and Professor of Economics at the [[University of Southern California]]. He is a member of the [[United States National Academy of Sciences|National Academy of Sciences]] and the [[American Academy of Arts and Sciences]]. Easterlin is also a former [[List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 1988|Guggenheim Fellow]], and past president of the [[Population Association of America]], and the [[Economic History Association]].

Easterlin is in particular known for his 1974 article "Does Economic Growth Improve the Human Lot? Some Empirical Evidence" and the [[Easterlin paradox]] which he stated there, namely that, contrary to expectation, happiness at a national level does not increase with wealth once basic needs are fulfilled.

{{DEFAULTSORT:Easterlin, Richard A.}}
[[Category:University of Southern California faculty]]
[[Category:Living people]]

[[fr:Richard Easterlin]]

Boyd Coddington

2009-10-27T20:32:53Z

*SM*: interwiki

{{Infobox Celebrity
| name = Boyd Coddington
| image = BoydCoddington.jpg
| caption =
| birth_date = {{Birth date|1944|08|28|mf=y}}
| birth_place = [[Rupert, Idaho|Rupert]], [[Idaho]], [[United States]]
| death_date = {{death date and age|2008|2|27|1944|08|28|mf=y}}
| death_place =
| occupation = Automobile designer, TV show host
| salary =
| net worth =
| website = [http://www.billetwheel.com/ www.billetwheel.com]
| footnotes =
}}

'''Boyd Leon Coddington''' ([[August 28]], [[1944]] – [[February 27]], [[2008]])<ref name="jpnk1">{{cite web
| publisher = jalopnik.com
| title = Boyd Coddington, Hot Rod King, Dead At Age 63
| url = http://jalopnik.com/361391/boyd-coddington-hot-rod-king-dead-at-age-63
}}</ref> was the owner of the Boyd Coddington Hot Rod Shop and star of ''[[American Hot Rod]]'' on [[TLC (TV channel)|TLC]].

== Background ==
Coddington grew up in [[Rupert, Idaho]], reading all the car and hot rod magazines he could, and got his first car (a 1931 [[Chevrolet]] truck) at age 8.<ref name="forbes">{{cite web
| last = Lienert | first = Dan
| title = The Hot Rod King
| publisher = Forbes.com
| date = [[June 1]] [[2004]]
| url = http://www.forbes.com/vehicles/2004/06/01/cx_dl_0601feat.html
}}
</ref> He attended [[machinist]] trade school at [[Idaho State University]] and completed a three-year apprenticeship in machining. In 1968, he moved to California building [[hot rod]]s by night and working as a machinist at [[Disneyland]] during the day. He soon became known for building unique hot rods and in 1977 he opened his own shop, Hot Rods by Boyd, in [[Cypress, California]]. He realized quick success: his first major customer was [[Vern Luce]] whose car, a 1933 coupe, won the Al Slonaker Award at the 1981 [[Oakland, California|Oakland]] Roadster show.

==Design innovations==
Coddington's clean, elegant aesthetic married modern automotive streamlining to the classic forms of 1930s to 1960s American iron.<ref name="jpnk2">A gallery of Coddington's work: {{cite web
| title = Boyd Coddington, Hot Rod King, Dead At Age 63
| url = http://jalopnik.com/361391/boyd-coddington-hot-rod-king-dead-at-age-63
}}</ref> It featured radically transformed vintage styling, but re-engineered around modern and scratch-built components: at the customer's preference a [[George Barris]]-style body could sit atop a chassis with the comfort and accessories of a modern [[luxury vehicle]], or around the [[roll cage]] and [[Exhaust pipes#With or without catalytic converter|open pipes]] of a [[Bonneville Salt Flats#Racing and speed records|salt-flats racer]].

[[Image:CadZZilla 2005 April Longhorn Hot Rod Show, Austin TX.jpg|thumb | right | CadZZilla on display at the April 2005 Longhorn Hot Rod the best movie ever show, in Austin, TX. The car was driven to the event.]]

One of Coddington's signature innovations were his custom-fabricated [[Magnesium alloy wheel|alloy wheel]]s, typically machined from a solid [[Billet (manufacturing)|billet (block) of aluminum]] (an industry first). Boyd pioneered this 'billet' machined look and applied it not only to wheels but broadly throughout the car<ref name="hsw2"/>.

In 1988, Coddington founded Boyd's Wheels, Inc., to manufacture and market these custom billet wheels. His popularization of machined billet wheels had broad impact, eventually spreading out of the hot rod world to enormously influence the popularity of custom rims within hip-hop culture. Among his many innovative designs was a unique set of wheels commissioned for the Chevrolet Camaro RS/SS.

Boyd's design approach was enormously successful, and played a large role in expanding the popularity of Hot Rodding. As opposed to its previous zenith among the youth of the 1940's to early 1970's, its resurgence in the 90's was among an older crowd -- those selfsame youth, nostalgic for classic styling but demanding modern appointments, and now with the checkbook to pay for both. This eventually led to excess of its own. In later year most cars competing for top awards represented major commissions involving multiple firms (Coddington's frequently among them), custom-designed parts and price tags often over half a million dollars. In the process this priced out much of the hobby's grass-roots appeal. From a design standpoint as well, many consider that the modern hot-rod aesthetic has led to austere cookie-cutter trailer queens; the current "[[Rat Rod]]" movement in hotrodding explicitly refutes this immoderation. Some of Coddington's is considered bland and dated in rat rod traditional hot rod circles, particularly his earlier work. and Still, to the end of his career (and continuing currently), those with the means to do so have eagerly sought Coddington's services and products. His major works continue to be held in high regard, and throughout his career he ranked among his industry's top practitioners, both commercially and artistically.

==CadZZilla==

There is no better demonstration of Coddington's design aesthetic than his masterwork, "[[ZZ Top#CadZZilla|CadZZilla]]". Commissioned by [[ZZ Top]]'s [[Billy Gibbons]] and designed by [[Larry Erickson]]<ref name="cp1">{{cite web
| title = Iconic "Cadzzilla" Part of New Exhibit at Saratoga Automobile Museum
| url = http://www.cliftonpark.org/articles/content.asp?MemberID=4268
}}</ref>, CadZZilla is universally acclaimed as one of the greatest expressions of automotive customization<ref name="hsw1">{{cite web
| title = History of Hot Rods & Customs
| author = The Auto Editors of Consumer Guide
| page = 11
| publisher = Consumer Guide
| date = [[September 19]] [[2007]]
| url = http://auto.howstuffworks.com/hot-rod11.htm
| accessdate = 12 December 2008
}} ''The design language of the top, hood, side window openings, and front and rear ends was completely new and different from anything that had gone before it. CadZZilla created a stir and was instantly recognized as one of the all-time great custom cars.''</ref>. Renowned columnist Gray Baskerville called CadZZilla "the most incredible transformation he’d ever witnessed"<ref name="cp1">{{cite web
| title = Iconic "Cadzzilla" Part of New Exhibit at Saratoga Automobile Museum
| url = http://www.cliftonpark.org/articles/content.asp?MemberID=4268
}}</ref>, and in their "History of Hot Rods & Customs" the auto editors of Consumer Guide praise it as "the first really new type of custom since the heyday of the 1950s"<ref name="hsw2">{{cite web
| title = History of Hot Rods & Customs
| page = 10
| author = The Auto Editors of Consumer Guide
| publisher = Consumer Guide
| date = [[September 19]] [[2007]]
| url = http://auto.howstuffworks.com/hot-rod10.htm
| accessdate = 12 December 2008
}}</ref>

==Artistic legacy==

Many of the next generation of customizers started their career with Coddington. Larry Erickson, later the Chief Designer of the Mustang and Thunderbird for Ford Motor Co., worked with Coddington early on, and specifically credits the CadZZilla collaboration for jump-starting his career<ref name="hrm">{{cite web
| title = Dream - 1932 Chevrolet Roadster
| author = HOT ROD Magazine
| publisher = Petersen Automotive
| url = http://hotrod.automotive.com/75974/0301-hrdp-1932-chevrolet-roadster/index.html
| accessdate = 12 December 2008
}}</ref>. Legendary designer (and "Overhaulin'" star) [[Chip Foose]], and fabricator (and "Motorcycle Mania" star) [[Jesse G. James|Jesse James]] <ref name="cblt">{{cite web
| title = Jesse James (profile)
| author = The ''COACHBUILT Encyclopedia of American Coachbuilders & Coachbuilding''
| url = http://www.coachbuilt.com/des/j/james/james.htm
| accessdate = 12 December 2008
}} ''In 1992, after an apprenticeship of sorts with the legendary hot-rod builder Boyd Coddington, James started up his own shop.''</ref> both started their careers in his shop. Foose rose to become the president of Coddington's company Hot Rods by Boyd, but later departed to start his own firm. The two became fierce competitors, to the point that their personal relationship split.<ref name="ocr">{{cite web
| title = Driven to be the best
| author = Chantal Lamers
| publisher = Orange County Register Newspaper
| date = 2006-05-07
| url = http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/homepage/abox/article_1132711.php
| accessdate = 12 December 2008
}} ''The reunion sparked a feud between Foose and Coddington after a handful of people left Boyd's for other shops, then sooner or later landed at the Foose shop.''</ref> Coddington hosted the Discovery Channel show “American Hot Rod", where he competed fiercely as well with his former protegé.

Coddington's creations have won the Grand National Roadster Show's "America's Most Beautiful Roadster (AMBR)" award seven times,
the Daimler-Chrysler Design Excellence award twice, and entry into both the Grand National Roadster Show Hall of Fame and the National Rod & Custom Museum Hall of Fame<ref name="nyt1">{{cite web
| title = Boyd Coddington, 63, King of Hot Rods, Dies
| publisher = New York Times
| date = [[March 1]], [[2008]]
| url = http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/01/sports/othersports/01coddington.html?scp=1&sq=coddington&st=cse
}}</ref> . In 1997, Coddington (along with [[Chip Foose|Foose]]), was inducted into the Hot Rod Hall of Fame<ref name="ibl1"/>.

==Later financial trouble and the "Ship of Theseus"==

In 1998, financial trouble and a $465,000 writeoff of money due from a bankrupt customer led Coddington to re-organize Boyds Wheels.<ref name="ibl1">{{cite web
| title = Troubled Company Reporter - BOYDS WHEELS: Third Quarter Report
| publisher = InterNet Bankruptcy Library
| date = [[December 18]] [[1997]]
| url = http://bankrupt.com/TCR_Public/971218.MBX
}}</ref>
<ref name="ibl2">{{cite web
| title = Troubled Company Reporter - BOYDS WHEELS: Reorganization Plan Filed
| publisher = InterNet Bankruptcy Library
| date = [[July 23]], [[1998]]
| url = http://bankrupt.com/TCR_Public/980723.MBX
}}</ref>

More seriously, in 2005 Coddington's design aesthetic and some questionable judgement gave rise to severe epistemic and financial difficulties. His designs, as has been said, centrally feature scratch-built components and appropriated parts to extensively modify the foundation of a vintage automobile. In his later days he began registering cars that were essentially completely custom fabrications as [[antique automobile]]s, avoiding major [[Emission standard|emissions restrictions]] and [[tax]] liabilities. California officials considered this a "[[Ship of Theseus]]" fraud, claiming that so many central elements were replaced the cars ceased to be the same entity. Coddington was charged with a misdemeanor and plead guilty on [[April 7]], [[2005]].<ref name="nyt2">{{cite web
| title = Boyd Coddington, Hot Rod Hero, Dies at 63
| publisher = New York Times
| date = [[February 27]], [[2008]]
| url = http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/27/boyd-coddington-hot-rod-hero-dies-at-63
}} ''In 2005, he was accused of fraud by the State of California for titling his custom-fabricated creations as "antique cars" to avoid emissions controls and tax obligations''</ref>

==Death==
Coddington had been hospitalized December 31, 2007 shortly after New Year's Eve. (?)<ref>[http://streetimportonline.com/sio/hot-rod-legend-boyd-coddington-hospitalized-2.html Hot Rod Legend Boyd Coddington Hospitalized]</ref> He was discharged, but was readmitted just a few days later to Presbyterian Intercommunity Hospital in suburban [[Whittier, California]].

After being readmitted, doctors performed surgery and Boyd was expected to make a complete recovery. Coddington died on [[February 27]], [[2008]]. His publicist stated that Coddington was a long-time diabetic who died from complications that were brought on from a recent surgery along with liver and kidney complications.<ref>[http://www.latimes.com/news/printedition/california/la-me-coddington29feb29,1,910979.story Boyd Coddington, 63; custom car designer starred on 'American Hot Rod' - Los Angeles Times]</ref>

==References==

jan
{{reflist}}

==External links==
*[http://www.billetwheel.com Boyd Coddington Official Website]
*[http://dsc.discovery.com/fansites/americanhotrod/americanhotrod.html ''American Hot Rod'' Official Website]
*[http://www.unburiedcar.com Boyd Coddington Helps Exhume Buried 1957 Plymouth Belvedere in Tulsa, Oklahoma]
*[http://www.sonsofboyd.com The official tribute site owned and maintained by the sons of Boyd Coddington, Boyd JR., Chris and Greg]

{{DEFAULTSORT:Coddington, Boyd}}
[[Category:SEMA Members]]
[[Category:2008 deaths]]
[[Category:1944 births]]
[[Category:American automotive engineers]]
[[Category:American fraudsters]]
[[category:people with diabetes]]
[[Category:People from Idaho]]

[[fr:Boyd Coddington]]
[[bg:Бойд Кодиктън]]
[[no:Boyd Coddington]]
[[sv:Boyd Coddington]]

Kendall Myers

2009-10-20T21:09:26Z

*SM*: interwiki

'''Walter Kendall Myers''' (born 1937)<ref> [http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2009/images/06/05/myers.indictment.pdf United States v. Walter Kendall Myers, United States District Court, District of Columbia, no. xxx.]</ref> is a retired [[U.S. State Department]] Officer who, with his wife Gwendolyn Myers, was arrested and indicted on June 4, 2009 on charges of nearly 30 years of spying for [[Cuba]].<ref name = "msnbc_20090605">{{cite news| url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31129203/| title = Couple indicted on charges of spying for Cuba| date = June 5, 2009| accessdate = June 5, 2009| publisher = msnbc.com}}</ref><ref>Cuban Spies Arrested http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2009/06a/124404.htm</ref><ref name = "statedept">http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2009/06a/124404.htm</ref>

==Background==
Kendall Myers is the grandson of [[Gilbert Grosvenor]] and great-grandson of [[Alexander Graham Bell]].<ref name = "abcnews_20090605">{{citenews| url = http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=7768394&page=1| title = Couple Accused of Spying for Cuba| date = June 5, 2009| accessdate = June 5, 2009| author = Jason Ryan, Theresa Cook, Lisa Chinn| publisher = abcnews.go.com}}</ref> He went to college at [[Brown University]] and earned a Ph.D. from [[Johns Hopkins University]].<ref name = "abcnews_20090605"/> He began working for the US State Department as a contract instructor at its [[Foreign Service Institute]] in 1977,<ref name = "washpost 606">{{citenews| url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/05/AR2009060502359.html?hpid=topnews| title = State Dept. Retiree Accused of Spying| date = June 6, 2009| accessdate = June 5, 2009| author = Del Quentin Wilber and Mary Beth Sheridan| publisher = washingtonpost.com}}</ref> and for 20 years, he has been a part-time faculty member at Johns Hopkins' [[Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies]].<ref name = "washpost 606" /> From 2000 until his retirement in October 2007, he worked as a European analyst in the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR). Mr. Myers’ State Department service was primarily in domestic positions. Mr. Myers’ spouse, Gwendolyn Steingraber Myers, was never employed by the U.S. Department of State.<ref name = "statedept"/>

==US–UK "special relationship" controversy==
In November 2006, Myers created controversy by describing the "[[special relationship]]" between the United States and the United Kingdom as "one sided" and a "myth".<ref name = "telegraph_20090605">{{cite news| url = http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/5456226/Ex-US-State-official-Kendall-Myers-and-wife-Gwendolyn-charged-with-spying-for-Cuba.html| title = Ex-US State official Kendall Myers and wife Gwendolyn charged with spying for Cuba| author = Toby Harnden| date = June 5, 2009| accessdate = June 5, 2009| publisher = telegraph.co.uk}}</ref><ref name = "timesonline_20061130">{{cite news| url = http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article1088295.ece| title = US State Department official - relationship is one-sided| author = Tom Baldwin, Philip Webster| date = November 30, 2006| accessdate = June 5, 2009| publisher = timesonline.co.uk}}</ref> He said that he was "ashamed" of the treatment by US President [[George W. Bush]] toward Prime Minister [[Tony Blair]].<ref name = "timesonline_20061130"/>

In response, UK MP [[Denis MacShane]] said, "After the Republican defeat in the midterm election, every little rat who feasted during the Bush years is now leaving the ship. I would respect this gentleman, who I have never heard of, if he had had the guts to make any of these points two or five years ago."<ref name = "timesonline_20061130"/>

The US State Department distanced itself from Myers comments, stating, "He was speaking as an academic, not as a representative of the State Department."<ref name = "timesonline_20061130"/>

==Espionage charge==
On June 4, 2009, Myers was arrested and charged, along with his wife Gwendolyn Steingraber Myers, with acting as an illegal agent of the Cuban government for nearly 30 years, with providing classified information to that government, and wire fraud.<ref>[http://i.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2009/images/06/05/myers.indictment.pdf Myers' indictment]</ref><ref name = "cnn_20090605">{{cite news| url = http://www.cnn.com/2009/US/06/05/us.cuba.spies/index.html?eref=rss_topstories| title = Ex-State official, wife accused of spying for Cuba| date = June 5, 2009| accessdate = June 5, 2009| publisher = CNN.com}}</ref> Authorities said that Myers and his wife were caught by an [[FBI]] [[undercover]] operation and that they had been spying for Cuba for "nearly three decades."<ref name="washpost 0605">{{cite news| url = http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/05/AR2009060502359.html?hpid=topnews| title = D.C. Couple Is Indicted on Charges of Spying for Cuba |date = June 5, 2009| accessdate = June 5, 2009| publisher = washingtonpost.com}}</ref> The authorities also said that Myers usually relied on his memory or notes for information rather than stealing documents.<ref name="washpost 0605" /> The couple allegedly used [[shortwave radio]] to communicate with Cuban intelligence and also were said to have met with Cuban agents in numerous locations both inside and outside the United States.<ref name="washpost 0605" /> Myers told undercover agents that he had spent an evening with [[Fidel Castro]] in 1995.<ref name="washpost 0605" />

===Alleged motive===
It is alleged that the Myerses' actions may not have been prompted by greed, but more by ideology.<ref name = "cnn_20090605"/> According to a "law enforcement official", they were "true believers" in the Cuban system.<ref name = "cnn_20090605"/> The United States federal affidavit quoted a diary entry by Kendall Myers as saying, "I can see nothing of value that has been lost by the revolution. The revolution has released enormous potential and liberated the Cuban spirit."<ref name = "cnn_20090605"/>, and referred to [[Fidel Castro]] as "one of the great political leaders of our time."<ref name = "foxnews_20090605">{{citenews| url = http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/06/05/retired-state-official-wife-indicted-charges-spying-cuba/| title = Retired U.S. State Official, Wife Indicted on Charges of Spying for Cuba| date = June 5, 2009| accessdate = June 5, 2009| publisher = foxnews.com}}</ref> Other entries quoted reference a comparison of [[health care in the United States]] and [[healthcare in Cuba]], and "complacency about the poor" in the United States.<ref name = "cnn_20090605"/>

==Reaction==
===United States===
[[United States Secretary of State]] [[Hillary Clinton]] has ordered that a damage assessment be done to investigate the extent of damage done to United States security.<ref name = "foxnews_20090605"/> The Secretary of State takes this matter seriously and has directed staff to conduct a comprehensive review of this case. She has also undertaken a thorough assessment of past and current Department of State security procedures and practices and provide recommendations for any appropriate or necessary improvements to ensure effective measures are in place to protect sensitive and classified information. In addition, the Secretary directed the Department to conduct a comprehensive damage assessment in coordination with the intelligence community in accordance with established damages protocols and regulations.<ref name = "statedept"/>

===Cuba===
{{quote|"I can't help but admire their disinterested and courageous conduct on behalf of Cuba. Those who in one form or another have helped to protect the Cuban people from the terrorist plans and assassination plots organised by various U.S. administrations have done so at the initiative of their own conscience and are deserving, in my judgment, of all the honours in the world."| [[Fidel Castro]], days after the Myers couple's arrest <ref name="FidelHP"> [http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/08/alleged-cuban-spies-given_n_212429.html Alleged Cuban Spies Given Praise From Castro] by ''The Huffington Post'', June 8 2009</ref>}}

Upon hearing the news of Myers' arrest, Fidel Castro stated that the case read like "an espionage comic strip".<ref name="FidelHP" /> The former Cuban leader declined to say whether the Myers couple really had passed secrets to his regime, but added that they deserved praise if they did.<ref name="FidelHP" />

==References==
{{reflist}}

==External links==
*[http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/06/06/why-cuban-spies-are-so-di_n_212216.html Why Cuban Spies Are So Difficult To Find] by Pamela Hess, ''The Huffington Post'', June 6 2009
*[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/06/AR2009060602245.html Disdain for U.S. Policies May Have Led to Alleged Spying for Cuba] by Mary Beth Sheridan, ''The Washington Post'', June 7 2009
* [http://www.smh.com.au/world/supermarket-trollies--tools-of-trade-for-castros-spies-20090608-c0qk.html?page=-1 Supermarket Trollies - Tools of Trade for Castro's 'Spies'] by ''The Sydney Morning Herald'', June 9 2009
* [http://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/other-views/story/1109349.html Cuba's Spy Program Deeply Rooted in U.S.] by Carlos Montaner, ''The Miami Herald'', June 23 2009

{{DEFAULTSORT:Myers, Kendall}}
[[Category:Johns Hopkins University faculty]]
[[Category:Brown University alumni]]
[[Category:Cuban spies]]
[[Category:United States Department of State officials]]
[[Category:1937 births]]
[[Category:Living people]]

[[fr:Walter Kendall Myers]]
[[de:Walter Kendall Myers]]

Parfait Tic!

2009-09-03T20:07:10Z

*SM*: interwiki

{{Infobox animanga/Header
| name = Parfait Tic!
| image = [[Image:ParfaitTic! vol09 cover.jpg|200px]]
| caption = ''Parfait Tic!'' Japanese vol 9
| ja_kanji = パフェちっく!
| ja_romaji = Pafe Chikku!
| genre = [[Romantic comedy]]
}}
{{Infobox animanga/Manga
| title =
| author = [[Nagamu Nanaji]]
| publisher = {{flagicon|Japan}} [[Shueisha]]
| publisher_other = {{flagicon|China}} [[Jade Dynasty Publications Ltd|Jade Dynasty]] {{flagicon|Italy}} [[Star Comics (publisher)|Star Comics]] {{flagicon|France}} [[Panini Comics]] {{flagicon|Indonesia}} [[Elex Media Komputindo|Elex Media]]
| demographic = [[Shōjo manga|Shōjo]]
| magazine = [[Margaret (magazine)|Margaret]]
| first = 2000
| last = 2007
| volumes = 22
}}
{{Infobox animanga/Footer}}

{{nihongo|'''''Parfait Tic!'''''|パフェちっく!|Pafe Chikku!}} is a [[Japan]]ese [[shōjo manga]] by [[Nagamu Nanaji]]. It was published by [[Shueisha]] in ''[[Margaret (magazine)|Margaret]]'' from 2000 to 2007 and collected in 22 [[tankōbon|volumes]]. The story revolves around the lives of a girl and two boys (cousins), and their [[love triangle]].

==Story==
Fuuko (or Fuu-chan for friends) is a lively girl starting her first year of highschool. Her life is turned upside down by the arrival of her new neighbors: the [[bishōnen]] Shinpo cousins, Daiya and Ichi.

Fuuko initially falls for the playboy Daiya. Unfortunately, her first love is an [[unrequited love]]. Daiya claims he does not know what 'being in love' feels like. Suffering from her first heartbreak, she receives unexpected support from Ichi. Although he seems cold, Ichi actually is in love with Fuuko. The two spend more and more time together, and Fuuko discovers she has feelings for Ichi too. Only 'official' confessions away from being a couple, a woman from Ichi's past shows up. Iori-san used to work for the Shinpo family company. Back then, Ichi had fallen in love with her (even though she had a boyfriend, and was some years older than him). His [[infatuation]] was big enough to worry his parents, who had her fired. Now that she's back in his life, Ichi's feelings turn to her again. Not even his budding relationship with Fuuko can lessen his need to be with Iori. Fuuko can't deal with this and they part ways.
Fuuko is heartbroken again, but this time the pain runs much deeper. Her love for Ichi was more serious than her former crush on Daiya. [[Irony|Ironically]], it's Daiya who supports her through these hard times. Ichi spends his free time with Iori, and Daiya tries his hardest to distract Fuuko. Slowly, Daiya is beginning to understand 'what it is to be in love', as he is falling in love with Fuuko. But she can't return his feelings, she is not over Ichi yet.
At New Year, Daiya asks Fuuko if she wants to go out with him. Taking a fresh start, Fuuko accepts. Meanwhile, Ichi says goodbye to Iori, as he finally understands she only sees him as a little brother, while the one she really loves is her boyfriend.
Fuuko and Daiya are getting along fairly well as a couple although sometimes Fuuko thinks of Ichi, remembering her lost love for him. Then at the end of Volume 14, Fuuko is speaking with Ichi in the classroom when she falls and they accidentally kiss. Although the only person who saw was Fuuko's friend, Fuuko is extremely worried about Daiya finding out as she can't work up the courage to tell him honestly. She goes to see Ichi and begs him not to tell Daiya that it happened. Ichi agrees, but the cousins have a misunderstanding which leads Daiya to realize that something happened between Ichi and Fuuko. He finally confronts Fuuko about it and asks her why she didn't tell him from the beginning. Afterwards, they have a fight and don't talk to each other. The next night Fuuko comes out of her window and sees Ichi. They start a conversation, but as they were talking, Daiya sees the two of them. He hides behind a car and thinks that Fuuko still has feelings for Ichi. Daiya, the next day, asks Ichi about any romantic feelings between Ichi and Fuuko, which causes a fight between the two cousins. Later, while Daiya is at work he is hit by a truck and is rushed to the hospital. Meanwhile Fuuko is making a knitted cap for Daiya. Although at the point Fuuko doesn't find out about the accident, she soon does and makes her way to the hospital with the knitted cap. Daiya is confirmed to be fine, but gets angry at Fuuko accusing her that she still has feelings for Ichi. Fuuko throws the knitted cap at him and claims that she doesn't know what her feelings are at this point but when she was knitting that cap all she thought about was Daiya. The manga continues with the three friends continuing to be friends and getting along once again. At this point of the manga it leaves of with the secretary of student council seen to be copying Fuuko previous day's hairstyle. Guessed to be because of jealousy of Fuuko's friendliness of the two boys. Ichi tells Fuuko that he loves her in the latest point of the story. The manga has recently begun to continue the plot from this point onwards.

==Characters==
;Fuuko Kameyama
: Is the upbeat main character. She likes playing with little children and hairstyling. Wears her own hair in unusual and complicated styles. She does feel insecure about her looks, especially when being compared to Daiya and Ichi. Had to take swimming lessons from Ichi in order to pass P.E.{{-}} At the beginning, Fuuko had a big crush on Daiya but when she confessed he rejected her kindly. Ichi helped her to mend her inner wounds and she fell genuinely in love with him, but at the same time, Daiya was falling in love with her. Although Ichi loved Fuuko, he loved Iori very much too so he dumped Fuuko. Daiya took this as a chance to go out with Fuuko. Fuuko appears to have reconnected with her feelings for Daiya, but it is not known whether she is still in love with Ichi.
;Ichi Shinpo
: The cold and quiet love interest. [[Class President]] and ranks first on school tests, but rather shy and comes across as a haughty guy. Actually very caring once you get to know him. Works part-time in a restaurant. Not good at household chores. Really bad at drawing. Scared of dogs and [[haunted house]]s. He is very quiet but seems to be different when near or around Fuuko.{{-}} Fuuko had been in love with Ichi, but she ended things with him because of his inability to let go of his feelings for Iori. Although he is still in love with Fuuko, she is now dating Daiya. However, he seems to be open to the idea of tearing the two apart.
;Daiya Shinpo
: A happy-go-lucky playboy. Not very academic, but wins everyone's heart with his open character. Used to date many girls at the same time, but stopped doing that after he had to reject Fuuko. Sometimes gives surprise performances as a singer in a two-man band, "The F brothers" with Issochi. {{-}} He is currently dating Fuuko after finally gaining her feelings back for him, but he is insecure about the relationship because he knows that Ichi is still in love with Fuuko and that Fuuko once really loved Ichi,
;Iori
: 21 years old. Used to work at the Shinpo family firm, but got fired when Ichi fell in love with her. She has a boyfriend who is busy with work most of the time. She relies on Ichi to make her feel better. He mistakes this for love, but she regards him as a little brother.{{-}}
;Mako Oobayashi
: Friend and classmate of Fuuko. Wears her fair hair up.
;Chiso Komori: Friend and classmate of Fuuko. Has dark, wavy hair.{{-}}
;Akio-[[senpai]]
: She pretends to be beautiful, elegant and refined but actually is a lot like Fuuko. She is a tennis club member. At first she was only using Fuuko in order to get close to Daiya. She was rejected by him, and a real friendship has started between her and Fuuko. Starts "dating" Isocchi.{{-}}
;Isobe Satoshi
: Daiya's classmate. Daiya mistakenly thinks Fuuko is in love with him, and tries to set them up. After being rejected by Fuuko, his eye falls on Akio-senpai. Their relationship progresses slowly. Plays the guitar in "The F brothers".{{-}}
;Misora Kameyama
: Fuuko's older sister. Works as a [[mangaka]], and is usually dressed comfy and scruffy. She is actually quite beautiful once she makes an effort. Still lives with her parents, and calls on Fuuko and the Shinpo's for help (and inspiration) when she has troubles to make her [[deadline]]s.{{-}}
;Koto Shinpo
: Ichi's little sister and self-proclaimed fiancé. Wants to be like him, and adapts the same cool and haughty attitude. Very mature for a firstgrader. She didn't want to go with her parents because of Ichi, now she lives with her grandmother. Dislikes Fuuko for being in love with Ichi, but still thinks Fuuko's not as bad as Iori.{{-}}

==List of media==
===Volumes===
List of published manga [[tankoubons|volumes]] <ref>[http://www.7andy.jp 7Andy.jp] online bookstore, Accessed on [[2007-07-12]]</ref>
* Volume 1 (25/09/2000) ISBN 4-08-847277-2
* Volume 2 (15/12/2000) ISBN 4-08-847316-7
* Volume 3 (25/04/2001) ISBN 4-08-847361-2
* Volume 4 (24/08/2001) ISBN 4-08-847405-8
* Volume 5 (25/01/2002) ISBN 4-08-847460-0
* Volume 6 (24/05/2002) ISBN 4-08-847503-8
* Volume 7 (25/09/2002) ISBN 4-08-847548-8
* Volume 8 (25/02/2003) ISBN 4-08-847599-2
* Volume 9 (25/06/2003) ISBN 4-08-847638-7
* Volume 10 (24/10/2003) ISBN 4-08-847673-5
* Volume 11 (25/03/2004) ISBN 4-08-847722-7
* Volume 12 (23/07/2004) ISBN 4-08-847759-6
* Volume 13 (25/11/2004) ISBN 4-08-847797-9
* Volume 14 (25/04/2005) ISBN 4-08-847842-8
* Volume 15 (25/07/2005) ISBN 4-08-847873-8
* Volume 16 (25/11/2005) ISBN 4-08-846003-0
* Volume 17 (24/03/2006) ISBN 4-08-846038-3
* Volume 18 (25/08/2006) ISBN 4-08-846083-9
* Volume 19 (25/12/2006) ISBN 4-08-846119-3
* Volume 20 (04/2007) ISBN 978-4-08-846160-1
* Volume 21 (06/2007) ISBN 978-4-08-846179-3
* Volume 22 (08/2007) ISBN 978-4-08-846201-1

===Other===
* Parfait Tic! [[Drama CD]] (01/10/2004) ISBN 4-08-905673-X

==References==
{{reflist}}

==External links==
*[http://annex.s-manga.net/parfaittic/ Official Parfait Tic! site] {{ja icon}}
*[http://comics-news.shueisha.co.jp/common/parfait/index.html Parfait Tic! Drama CD page] {{ja icon}}
*{{ann manga|id=2876}}

[[Category:Drama anime and manga]]
[[Category:Romantic comedy anime and manga]]
[[Category:Shōjo]]
[[Category:Manga of 2000]]
[[Category:School anime and manga]]

[[id:Parfait Tic!]]
[[ja:パフェちっく!]]
[[zh:愛似百匯]]
[[fr:Parfait-Tic !]]

Library War

2009-07-18T00:48:34Z

*SM*:

{{Infobox animanga/Header
| name = Toshokan Sensō
| image = [[File:ToshokanSenso.png|230px]]
| caption = ''Toshokan Sensō'', the first light novel in the series.
| ja_kanji = 図書館戦争
| ja_romaji =
| genre = [[Action (genre)|Action]], [[Social science fiction|Social sci-fi]]
}}
{{Infobox animanga/Novel
| light = yes
| author = [[Hiro Arikawa]]
| illustrator = [[Sukumo Adabana]]
| publisher = {{flagicon|Japan}} [[MediaWorks (publisher)|MediaWorks]]
| first = February 2006
| last = November 2007
| volumes = 4
}}
{{Infobox animanga/Manga
| title = Toshokan Sensō Love & War
| author = [[Hiro Arikawa]]
| illustrator = Kiiro Yumi
| publisher = {{flagicon|Japan}} [[Hakusensha]]
| magazine = [[LaLa]]
| demographic = [[Shōjo manga|Shōjo]]
| first = September 24, 2007
| last =
| volumes = 3
}}
{{Infobox animanga/Manga
| title = Toshokan Sensō Spitfire!
| author = [[Hiro Arikawa]]
| illustrator = Yayoi Furudori
| publisher = {{flagicon|Japan}} [[ASCII Media Works]]
| magazine = [[Dengeki Daioh]]
| demographic = [[Shōnen manga|Shōnen]]
| first = November 21, 2007
| last =
| volumes = 1
}}
{{Infobox animanga/Anime
| title = Library War
| director = [[Takayuki Hamana]]
| studio = {{flagicon|Japan}} [[Production I.G]]
| writer = Takeshi Konuta
| licensor =
| network = {{flagicon|Japan}} [[Fuji TV]] ([[Noitamina]])
| first = April 11, 2008
| last = June 26, 2008
| episode_list = List of Toshokan Sensō episodes
| episodes = 12
}}
{{Infobox animanga/OVA
| title = Library War
| director = [[Takayuki Hamana]]
| studio = {{flagicon|Japan}} [[Production I.G]]
| episodes = 1
| released = October 1, 2008
| runtime = 24 minutes
}}
{{Infobox animanga/Footer}}
{{Nihongo|'''''Toshokan Sensō'''''|図書館戦争||lit. ''Library War''}} is a [[Japan]]ese [[light novel]] series by [[Hiro Arikawa]], with illustrations by [[Sukumo Adabana]]. There are four novels in the series, though only the first novel is called ''Toshokan Sensō''; the subsequent novels are named ''Toshokan Nairan'', ''Toshokan Kiki'', and ''Toshokan Kakumei''. The novels were published by [[MediaWorks (publisher)|MediaWorks]] between February 2006 and November 2007. Two volumes of a [[spin-off]] series entitled {{Nihongo|''Bessatsu Toshokan Sensō''|別冊図書館戦争||lit. ''Supplement: Library War''}} have also been published by [[ASCII Media Works]]. As of April 2008, the original four novels and volume one of the spin-off series have sold over 1.25 million copies in Japan.<ref name="anime-intro"/> The story was inspired from the ''Statement on Intellectual Freedom in Libraries'' of the Japan Library Association.<ref>{{citeweb|url=http://www.tokyo-np.co.jp/article/living/doyou/CK2007081802042029.html|title=''Toshokan Sensō'' subject: Hiro Arikawa (author)|date=2007-08-18|accessdate=2008-03-20|language=Japanese}}</ref><ref name="jla_statement">{{citeweb|url= http://www.jla.or.jp/jiyu/english.html|title=Statement on Intellectual Freedom in Libraries|publisher=Japan Library Association|accessdate=2008-03-20}}</ref>

A [[manga]] adaptation by Kiiro Yumi started serialization in the [[shōjo manga]] [[List of manga magazines|magazine]] ''[[LaLa]]'' on September 24, 2007 published by [[Hakusensha]]; another manga adaptation by Yayoi Furudori started serialization in the [[shōnen]] manga magazine ''[[Dengeki Daioh]]'' on November 21, 2007 published by ASCII Media Works. A twelve-episode [[anime]] adaptation by [[Production I.G]] began airing on [[Fuji TV]]'s [[Noitamina]] programming block on April 11, 2008. Two [[Internet radio]] shows started in April 2008 meant to promote the series which are hosted by [[Seiyū|voice actors]] of the anime.

==Plot==
The background of the plot is based on the ''Statement on Intellectual Freedom in Libraries'' that went into effect in Japan in 1954 (amended in 1979), and the terms are a little different from the ''Freedom of the Library Law'' that appears in ''Toshokan Sensō''.

The simplified declaration:<ref name="jla_statement" />
<blockquote>
It is the most important responsibility of libraries to offer collected materials and library facilities to the people who have the Right to Know as one of their fundamental human rights. In order to fulfill their mission, libraries shall recognize the following matters as their proper duties, and shall put them into practice.
# Libraries have freedom in collecting their materials.
# Libraries secure the freedom of offering their materials.
# Libraries guarantee the privacy of users.
# Libraries oppose any type of censorship categorically.
When the freedom of libraries is imperiled, we librarians will work together and devote ourselves to secure the freedom.
</blockquote>

In ''Toshokan Sensō'', the fourth chapter of the ''Freedom of Library Law'' states:<ref name="terms">{{citeweb|url=http://www.toshokan-sensou.com/yougo.html|title=Termonlogy section at ''Toshokan Sensō''{{'}}s official website|publisher=[[ASCII Media Works]]|accessdate=2008-07-01|language=Japanese}}</ref>
<blockquote>
<ol start="30">
<li> Libraries have freedom in collecting their materials. 
<li> Libraries secure the freedom of offering their materials. 
<li> Libraries guarantee the privacy of users. 
<li> Libraries oppose any type of improper censorship categorically. 
<li> When the freedom of libraries is imperiled, we librarians will work together and devote ourselves to secure the freedom.
</ol>
The details will be amended anytime according to the Media Betterment Act and its enforcement.
</blockquote>

===Story===
The premise of ''Toshokan Sensō'' involves the [[Government of Japan|Japanese government]] passing the Media Betterment Act (MBA) as law in 1989 which allows the [[censorship]] of any media deemed to be potentially harmful to Japanese society by deploying agents in the Media Betterment Committee (MBC) with the mandate to go after individuals and organizations that are trying to exercise the act of conducting freedom of expression activities in the media.<ref name="IG">{{cite web|url=http://www.productionig.com/contents/works_sp/65_/index.html|title=Library War|accessdate=2009-02-14|publisher=[[Production I.G]]}}</ref>{{ref|E01|Ep 01}} However, local governments opposed to the Media Betterment Act establishes armed anti-MBA defense force units to protect libraries from being raided by MBC agents under the Freedom of the Libraries Law.<ref name="Line">This line is always narrated by the [[Seiyū|leading seiyūs]] of the show at the beginning.</ref> The conflict between MBC agents and library soldiers has continued to 2019, when the story begins.<ref name="Line"/> In accordance with the [[Japanese era name|Japanese era calendar scheme]], 1989 in ''Toshokan Sensō'' is rendered the first year of the fictional {{Nihongo|Seika|正化}} era, rendering 2019 as Seika 31.<ref name="anime-story">{{citeweb|url=http://www.toshokan-sensou.com/intro_story.html|title=Introduction story section at the anime's official website|publisher=[[ASCII Media Works]]|accessdate=2008-05-08|language=Japanese}}</ref>

''Toshokan Sensō'' follows the life of Iku Kasahara, a new recruit in the [[Kantō region|Kantō]] Library Base who joined in 2019 after being inspired by a high ranking Kantō Library Defense Force member who saved a book she wanted to buy that was targeted for censorship.{{ref|E01|Ep 01}} After joining, however, she finds the pace to be very demanding, and that her [[drill instructor]] Atsushi Dojo seems to have it out for her by making it especially difficult for her. On multiple occasions, Kasahara shows herself to be reckless, particularly when she puts Dojo in danger by not securing a criminal in the base's library, and later getting involved with Media Betterment Committee agents despite not being a high enough ranked official; in both instances Dojo has to help her out of trouble. Despite these imperfections, Kasahara is enlisted into the base's Library Task Force, an elite group of soldiers who go through rigorous training in order to respond during difficult operations. This is partially due to Dojo realizing that he did not give Kasahara adequate training, so he gives his recommendation that she join the [[task force]],{{ref|E02|Ep 02}} of which he is a member, in order to correct this mistake on his part. Other recommendations come from the captain of the task force, Ryusuke Genda, and second class task force library officer Mikihisa Komaki who is the same rank as Dojo. Along with Kasahara, another new recruit named Hikaru Tezuka is also enlisted into the task force who is much more capable at the position than Kasahara. Kasahara continues to try her best in the face of difficult challenges while protecting the books she has sworn to protect.
[[Image:LDF Logo.jpg|thumb|left|The logo of the Library Defense Force.]]

===Library Team===
{| class="wikitable" style="float:right; margin-left:15px; padding-left:; line-height:; text-align:left; font-size:95%;"
|-
!width="180px"| [[Military rank]]{{ref|E02|Ep 02}}
!width="180px"| [[Insignia]]{{ref|E02|Ep 02}}
|-
| {{Nihongo|Supervising Librarian Special Class |特等図書監|Tokutō Toshokan}}
| One large [[German Chamomile]]
|-
| {{Nihongo|Supervising Librarian First Class |一等図書監|Ittō Toshokan}}
| Three Chamomile over two stacked books
|-
| {{Nihongo|Supervising Librarian Second Class |二等図書監|Nitō Toshokan}}
| Two Chamomile over two stacked books
|-
| {{Nihongo|Supervising Librarian Third Class |三等図書監|Santō Toshokan}}
| One Chamomile over two stacked books
|-
| {{Nihongo|Librarian First Class |一等図書正|Ittō Toshosei}}
| Three Chamomile over one book
|-
| {{Nihongo|Librarian Second Class |二等図書正|Nitō Toshosei}}
| Two Chamomile over one book
|-
| {{Nihongo|Librarian Third Class |三等図書正|Santō Toshosei}}
| One Chamomile over one book
|-
| {{Nihongo|Library Clerk Supervisor |図書士長|Tosho Shichō}}
| Three open books in a V
|-
| {{Nihongo|Library Clerk First Class |一等図書士|Ittō Toshoshi}}
| Two open books in a V
|-
| {{Nihongo|Library Clerk Second Class |二等図書士|Nitō Toshoshi}}
| One open book in a V
|-
| {{Nihongo|Library Clerk Third Class |三等図書士|Santō Toshoshi}}
| One closed book
|}
The {{Nihongo|Library Team Defense Force|図書隊防衛部|Toshotai Bōeibu}}, or Library Defense Force (LDF), in ''Toshokan Sensō'' is a [[military organization]] in Japan which serves to defend against the Media Betterment Act (MBA) enforced by the Media Betterment Committee (MBC) and other pro-MBA independent factions. Different from the normal {{Nihongo|librarian department|業務部|gyōmubu}}, which performs librarian positions like modern librarians, the LDF's main goal is to provide [[self-defense]] from the MBC during library raids, though their [[jurisdiction]] only extends so far as in the confines of library facilities in connection with the LDF, meaning they cannot extend their effort even into the city where an LDF base is located.{{ref|E02|Ep 02}}{{ref|E04|Ep 04}} However, there are provisions around this, such as in accordance with Library Law Article 30 regarding book collection in that LDF Library Officers or above can choose to buy any book they want, even books targeted for censorship by the MBC. The LDF has ten bases throughout Japan in ten [[regions of Japan]]: [[Hokkaidō]], [[Tōhoku region|Tōhoku]], [[Hokuriku region|Hokuriku]], [[Chūbu region|Chūbu]], [[Kantō region|Kantō]], [[Kansai region|Kansai]], [[Chūgoku region|Chūgoku]], [[Shikoku]], [[Kyūshū]], and [[Okinawa Prefecture|Okinawa]].{{ref|E02|Ep 02}} Each of the bases act under the provisions of the [[local government]], and houses a [[public library]] where civilians can read and check out books.

In the early years of the Library Team, the library forces were not well organized, so coordination with neighboring forces was often delayed which caused problems in times of [[War|armed conflict]]. One such incident in ''Toshokan Sensō'' occurred on February 7, 1999 in [[Hino, Tokyo]] at the Hino library which later became known as the {{Nihongo|Hino Nightmare|日野の悪夢|Hino no Akumu}}.{{ref|E02|Ep 02}} The incident was caused by an independent group who sided with the Media Betterment Committee who raided the library and caused the deaths of twelve people who were against the Media Betterment Act.{{ref|E03|Ep 03}} Since that day, the library forces armed themselves in self-defense and have become much more organized; the public even acknowledges the LDF as having more combat experience than the police or the [[Japan Self-Defense Forces]]. The incident also caused the formation of library bases in ten regions, and the system of library forces in operation at the beginning of ''Toshokan Sensō''.

The Library Defense Force has several branches which contribute to the organization as a whole. At the top is the [[Administration (business)|Administrative]] Department where library administrators work doing daily administrative duties such as [[planning]], organizing, [[staffing]], [[budget]]ing, or [[Leadership|directing]]. The Department of Defense works on defending against the Media Betterment Committee, and one section of the department consists of the Library Task Force, an elite [[Task force|group of soldiers]] who go through rigorous training in order to respond during difficult operations. At the Kantō Library Base, there are about fifty members in the task force. The [[Logistics|Logistical]] Support Department works on stocking books and supplying the Department of Defense with military equipment, though does not get involved with general [[outsourcing]]. There is also a Human Resources Department in charge of [[human resources]], and an [[intelligence agency]]. There are approximately 30,000 members in the Library Defense Force throughout Japan. The [[German Chamomile]] is used in the [[insignia]] of Library Officers and above because the flower was a favorite of the late wife of the Library Defense Force commander Kazuichi Inamine.

==Characters==
[[Image:Toshokan Sensō characters.jpg|thumb|400px|right|''Toshokan Sensō'' main characters (from left to right): Komaki, Shibasaki, Kasahara, Genda, Dojo, and Tezuka.]]

; {{Nihongo|Iku Kasahara|笠原郁|Kasahara Iku}}
: {{anime voices|[[Marina Inoue]]}}
: Iku Kasahara is the main character of ''Toshokan Sensō''; she is twenty-two-years-old and is initially ranked Library Clerk First Class, but is later promoted to Library Clerk Supervisor. She joined the Library Defense Force's [[Kantō region|Kantō]] Library Base in 2019 after being inspired by a high ranking Kantō Library Defense Force member who saved a book she wanted to buy that was targeted for censorship. She holds this unknown person in high regard, thinking of him as her "prince", and she wants to be an "ally of justice" as he was for her. As such, she has a strong sense of justice when it comes to freedom of expression and is willing to put her life on the line for the books she has sworn to protect. When she enters into [[recruit training]], however, she finds it to be very challenging, made especially so by her [[drill instructor]] Atsushi Dojo who pushes her harder than most other recruits. In high school, she had been a member of the [[Athletics (track and field)|track and field]] team, so she has a lot of stamina and drive to continue with the Library Defense Force.

: When the story begins, Kasahara is a sub-par recruit who constantly makes fatal mistakes and is not as knowledgeable about the cause she is in the middle of compared to others around her, mostly due to her not paying attention in lectures on the base. Despite these apparent flaws, she is recruited into the base's Library Task Force, an elite group of soldiers who go through rigorous training in order to respond during difficult operations. While at first she starts out slow, she soon becomes capable of clerical tasks in regard to working in the base's library, though still finds it difficult to make a strong presence on Dojo, her superior officer. Later on, Kasahara finds out that Dojo is actually her "prince" and she begins to warm up to him somewhat.

; {{Nihongo|Atsushi Dojo|堂上篤|Dōjō Atsushi}}
: {{anime voices|[[Tomoaki Maeno]]}}
: Atsushi Dojo is a twenty-seven-year-old member of the Library Task Force and is ranked Librarian Second Class. He is 165 cm (5'5"), though is thought to be too short for Kasahara, despite her only being 5 cm (2") taller. He is very rough on Kasahara due to her not inspiring enough trust in him, and the fact that he believes he did not give her adequate [[recruit training]]. Part of the reason why he pushes Kasahara so much is that he sees his old self in her, and he is angry that she is bringing that back to him with such emotional force, despite him trying to forget about it. He later realizes that he hurt her just so he could protect his fragile self. He often worries about Kasahara and even defends her from comments from others.

; {{Nihongo|Mikihisa Komaki|小牧幹久|Komaki Mikihisa}}
: {{anime voices|[[Akira Ishida]]}}
: Mikihisa Komaki, like Dojo, is twenty-seven-years-old, is a member of the Library Task Force, and is ranked Librarian Second Class. He is typically seen smiling or laughing at his coworkers, especially concerning the conversations between Kasahara and Dojo. He is also one of the instructors in the task force. He often gives advice to Dojo or Kasahara in regards to the relationship between them, whether it be on a personal or professional level. He is partly responsible to Kasahara being drafted into the task force.

; {{Nihongo|Hikaru Tezuka|手塚光|Tezuka Hikaru}}
: {{anime voices|[[Tatsuhisa Suzuki]]}}
: Hikaru Tezuka is a member of the Library Task Force and is initially ranked Library Clerk First Class, but is later promoted to Library Clerk Supervisor. He is drafted into the Library Task Force at the same time as Kasahara, though shows himself to be much more capable in terms of knowledge gained in lectures, clerical work in the base's library, and in typical combat. He finds it hard to give credit to Kasahara in the beginning since she is not up to what he considers to be the standards of a Library Task Force member, though he later recognizes her improvement. Due to a comment by Dojo that he could learn some things from her, Tezuka asked Kasahara if she would date him, though she later turns him down. He has an older brother named Satoshi Tezuka, who is a part of the government's Library Future Planning Committee.

; {{Nihongo|Asako Shibasaki|柴崎麻子|Shibasaki Asako}}
: {{anime voices|[[Miyuki Sawashiro]]}}
: Asako Shibasaki is in the Library Task Force and is initially ranked Library Clerk First Class, but is later promoted to Library Clerk Supervisor. She works on the inside as an informant in [[military intelligence]], and is very good at gathering information. She is Kasahara's [[roommate]], and after Kasahara joins the task force, Shibasaki helps her study the catalogs in the base's library through a form of negative [[reinforcement]] involving giving her candy when she gave the wrong answers which leads her to break out in [[pimple]]s. Shibasaki often tells Kasahara things she finds out in regards to Kasahara and her direct superiors such as Dojo or Genda. She tries to give Kasahara advice and cheer her up when she is sulking due to events most often brought on by Dojo.

; {{Nihongo|Ryusuke Genda|玄田竜助|Genda Ryūsuke}}
: {{anime voices|[[Kanji Suzumori]]}}
: Ryusuke Genda is the forty-three-year-old captain of the Library Task Force and is ranked Supervising Librarian Third Class. It is partly due to him that Kasahara is drafted into the task force, though since he is the captain, he had the final say. He is very strong, and Kasahara even thinks he has enough brawn to take on a bear full force. He is skilled in military command operations and in politics, such as giving Media Betterment Act agents books and magazines the Library Defense Force had copies of during an operation so that they do not leave empty handed either. He is somewhat impulsive, such as buying a new building for use as a future library only so that the task force could raid the [[premises]] and rescue Kasahara and Inamine when they are taken hostage.

; {{Nihongo|Kazuichi Inamine|稲嶺和市|Inamine Kazuichi}}
: {{anime voices|[[Haruo Satō]]}}
: Kazuichi Inamine is the commander of the Library Defense Forces who is in direct charge of the [[Kantō region|Kantō]] Library Base and has been involved with the conflict between the Media Betterment Committee and the Library Defense Force since early on. Twenty years prior to the beginning of the story, a major conflict between the two factions occurred at the library in [[Hino, Tokyo]] where a group siding with the Media Betterment Act raided the library. Inamine was caught in the middle of the conflict and lost his wife and his right leg because of it.

==Media==
===Light novels===
''Toshokan Sensō'' began as a series of [[light novel]]s written by [[Hiro Arikawa]], and drawn by [[Sukumo Adabana]]. There are four novels in the series, though only the first novel is called ''Toshokan Sensō''; the subsequent novels are named {{Nihongo|''Toshokan Nairan''|図書館内乱||lit. ''Library Infighting''}}, {{Nihongo|''Toshokan Kiki''|図書館危機||lit. ''Library Crisis''}}, and {{Nihongo|''Toshokan Kakumei''|図書館革命||lit. ''Library Revolution''}}. The novels were published by [[MediaWorks (publisher)|MediaWorks]] between February 2006 and November 2007. The first volume of a [[spin-off]] series entitled {{Nihongo|''Bessatsu Toshokan Sensō''|別冊図書館戦争||lit. ''Supplement: Library War''}} was published on April 10, 2008 by [[ASCII Media Works]], and the second followed on August 9, 2008.

===Manga===
There are two [[manga]] adaptations based on the series. The first, entitled ''Toshokan Sensō Love & War'', is drawn by Kiiro Yumi and started serialization in the Japanese [[shōjo manga]] [[List of manga magazines|magazine]] ''[[LaLa]]'' on September 24, 2007, published by [[Hakusensha]]. The first [[Tankōbon|bound volume]] for the first manga was released on April 5, 2008 under Hakusensha's ''Hana to Yume Comics'' [[imprint]], and the second followed on August 5, 2008. The second series, entitled ''Toshokan Sensō Spitfire!'', is drawn by Yayoi Furudori and started serialization in the Japanese [[shōnen]] manga magazine ''[[Dengeki Daioh]]'' on November 21, 2007, published by [[ASCII Media Works]].<ref>{{citeweb|url=http://www.mediaworks.co.jp/magazine/backno/dai_200801.php|title= ''Dengeki Daioh'' January 2008 issue|publisher=[[MediaWorks (publisher)|MediaWorks]]|accessdate=2008-02-29| language=Japanese}}</ref> The first [[Tankōbon|bound volume]] for ''Toshokan Sensō Spitfire!'' was released on June 27, 2008.<ref>{{citeweb|url= http://blog.toshokan-sensou.com/2008/05/7_1.html|title=The Cover of the July Issue of ''Dengeki Daioh'' is Iku!''| publisher=[[ASCII Media Works]]|date=2008-05-23|accessdate=2008-06-12|language=Japanese}}</ref>

===Internet radio shows===
Two [[Internet radio]] shows produced by [[Animate]] first aired on April 10, 2008 under the same main title {{Nihongo|''[[Kantō region|Kantō]] Book Base: Public Relations Department''|関東図書基地広報課|Kantō Tosho Kichi Kōhōka}}, but with differing subtitles. The first show, with the subtitle {{Nihongo|''Men's Dormitory''|男子寮|Danshi Ryō}} is hosted by Tomoaki Maeno and Tatsuhisa Suzuki who play Atsushi Dōjō and Hikaru Tezuka in the anime adaptation, respectively; the second show, with the subtitle {{Nihongo|''Women's Dormitory''|女子寮|Joshi Ryō}}, is hosted by [[Marina Inoue]] and [[Miyuki Sawashiro]] who play Iku Kasahara and Asako Shibasaki in the anime, respectively.<ref>{{citeweb|url= http://www.animate.tv/digital/web_radio/kanto_tosyokiti_man|title=Official website for ''Men's Dormitory'' radio show|publisher=[[Animate]]|accessdate=2008-04-28|language=Japanese}}</ref><ref>{{citeweb|url= http://www.animate.tv/digital/web_radio/kanto_tosyokiti_woman|title=Official website for ''Women's Dormitory'' radio show|publisher=[[Animate]]|accessdate=2008-04-28|language=Japanese}}</ref> The first volume compilation CD containing some of the broadcasts was released on August 6, 2008 with the second compilation on December 26, 2008.<ref name="TS CD">{{cite web|url=http://www.toshokan-sensou.com/goods_cd.html|title=Official website for ''CD Section''|publisher=[[ASCII Media Works]]|accessdate=2009-02-15|language=Japanese}}</ref>

===Anime===
{{see also|List of Toshokan Sensō episodes}}
It was announced by [[Production I.G]] via [[MediaWorks (publisher)|MediaWorks]] advertising that they would animate ''Toshokan Sensō''.<ref>{{citeweb|url=http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2007-11-07/production-i.g-to-animate-library-war-sci-fi-novel|title= Production I.G to Animate Library War Sci-Fi Novel|publisher=[[Anime News Network]]|date=2007-11-07|accessdate=2008-04-27}} </ref><ref>{{citeweb|url= http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2007-11-12/library-wars-tv-anime-announced|title=Library War Television Anime Officially Announced|publisher=[[Anime News Network]]|date=2007-11-12|accessdate=2008-04-27}}</ref> The [[anime]] is directed by [[Takayuki Hamana]] and written by Takeshi Konuta. It premiered in [[Japan]] on [[April 11]], [[2008]], on [[Fuji TV]]'s [[Noitamina]] programming block, and had aired all twelve episodes. A commercial and promo were both created to promote the series after the series was announced.<ref>{{citeweb|url= http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2008-04-03/library-war-promo-movie-commercial-posted-online|title=Library War Promo Movie, Commercial Posted Online|publisher=[[Anime News Network]]|date=2008-04-03|accessdate=2008-04-27}}</ref> The lead role of Iku Kasahara was given to [[Seiyū|voice actress]] [[Marina Inoue]].<ref>{{citeweb|url=http://news.dengeki.com/elem/000/000/073/73246/ |title=''Toshokan Sensō'' Serial Interview Ordinal 1: Marina Inoue as Iku!|publisher=[[ASCII Media Works]]|date=2008-04-11| accessdate=2008-04-27|language=Japanese}}</ref> Five [[DVD]] compilation volumes were released between August 6 and December 3, 2008; the first two contain the two episodes each, while the latter three contain three episodes each. The third volume contains, in addition to episodes six and seven, an [[original video animation]] episode.<ref name="anime-dvds">{{citeweb|url=http://www.toshokan-sensou.com/goods_dvd.html|title=DVD goods section at the anime's official website|publisher=[[ASCII Media Works]]|accessdate=2008-05-08|language=Japanese}}</ref>

The anime's opening theme is {{Nihongo|"Atashi no Machi, Ashita no Machi"|あたしの街、明日の街}}, performed and written by [[Hitomi Takahashi (singer)|Hitomi Takahashi]],<ref>{{citeweb|url=http://www.toshokan-sensou.com/music_takahashi.html|title=Hitomi Takahashi's profile at Toshokan Sensō's official website|publisher=[[ASCII Media Works]]|accessdate=2008-04-27|language=Japanese}}</ref> with Satoru Hirade on composition and arrangement and produced under [[Sony Music Japan|Sony Music Records]]. The opening theme [[Single (music)|single]] was released on June 4, 2008.<ref name="anime-music">{{citeweb|url= http://www.toshokan-sensou.com/music.html|title=Music section at the anime's official website|publisher=[[ASCII Media Works]]| accessdate=2008-05-08|language=Japanese}}</ref> The ending theme is "Changes" performed and arranged by [[Base Ball Bear]]<ref>{{citeweb|url= http://www.toshokan-sensou.com/music_bbb.html|title=Base Ball Bear's profile at Toshokan Sensō's official website|publisher=[[ASCII Media Works]]|accessdate=2008-04-27|language=Japanese}}</ref> of [[EMI Music Japan]] with lyrics and composition by Yūsuke Koide. The ending theme single was released on May 8, 2008.<ref name="anime-music"/> The anime's original soundtrack was released on June 25, 2008.<ref name="TS CD"/>

==Reception==
In the fourth Japan Science Fiction convention, ''Toshokan Sensō'' won the 2008 [[Seiun Award]] for Japanese long fiction.<ref>{{citeweb|url= http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2008-08-24/library-war-denno-coil-20th-century-boys-win-seiun-awards|title=''Library War'', ''Dennō Coil'', ''20th Century Boys'' Win Seiun Awards|publisher=[[Anime News Network]]|date=2008-08-24|accessdate=2008-08-26}}</ref> In the initial Anime DVD charts, ''Toshokan Sensō'' was ranked first on the top ten<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2008-08-14/japanese-animation-dvd-ranking-august-6-12|title=Japanese Animation DVD Ranking, August 6-12|accessdate=2009-02-17|date=2008-08-14|publisher=[[Anime News Network]]}}</ref> before it went down to eighth place.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2008-08-25/japanese-animation-dvd-ranking-august-13-20|title=Japanese Animation DVD Ranking, August 13–20|accessdate=2009-02-16|date=2008-08-25|publisher=[[Anime News Network]]}}</ref> The series had sold in 2008 a total of 7,949 copies.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2008-12-09/japanese-animation-dvd-ranking-december-3-9|title=Japanese Animation DVD Ranking, December 3-9|accessdate=2009-02-17|date=2008-12-09 |publisher=[[Anime News Network]]}}</ref> In 2008, ''Bessatsu Toshokan Sensō I'' had sold 62,737 copies and was ranked seventh best light novel while ''Bessatsu Toshokan Sensō II'' was ranked the fifth best light novel with a total of 67,874 copies sold.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2009-01-04/2008-top-selling-light-novels-in-japan|title=2008's Top-Selling Light Novels in Japan|accessdate=2009-02-17|date=2009-01-04|publisher=[[Anime News Network]]}}</ref> As of April 2008, the original four novels and volume one of the spin-off series have sold over 1.25 million copies in Japan.<ref name="anime-intro">{{cite web|url=http://www.toshokan-sensou.com/intro.html|title=Introduction section at the anime's official website|publisher=[[ASCII Media Works]]|accessdate=2008-08-11|language=Japanese}}</ref> After its debut broadcast, ''Toshokan Sensō'' had an average household rating of 4.5.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2008-06-15/japanese-anime-tv-ranking-june-2-8/2|title=Japanese Anime TV Ranking, June 2–8|date=2008-06-15|accessdate=2009-02-17|publisher=[[Anime News Network]]}}</ref>

==See also==
*[[Book burning]]
*''[[Fahrenheit 451]]''

==References==
{{reflist|2}}

===Episodes===
{{refbegin}}
*{{Note|E01}}{{cite episode | title = My Prince Charming is in the LDF | episodelink = List of Toshokan Sensō episodes#ep01 | series = Toshokan Sensō | network = [[Fuji Television]] | airdate = April 10, 2008 | seriesno = 1 | number = 1}}

*{{Note|E02}}{{cite episode | title = Library Task Force | episodelink = List of Toshokan Sensō episodes#ep02 | series = Toshokan Sensō | network = [[Fuji Television]] | airdate = April 17, 2008 | seriesno = 1 | number = 2}}

*{{Note|E03}}{{cite episode | title = Odawara Battle | episodelink = List of Toshokan Sensō episodes#ep03 | series = Toshokan Sensō | network = [[Fuji Television]] | airdate = April 24, 2008 | seriesno = 1 | number = 3}}

*{{Note|E04}}{{cite episode | title = Rescue the Book General| episodelink = List of Toshokan Sensō episodes#ep04 | series = Toshokan Sensō | network = [[Fuji Television]] | airdate = May 1, 2008 | seriesno = 1 | number = 4}}
{{refend}}

==External links==
*[http://www.toshokan-sensou.com/ Anime official website] {{ja icon}}
*{{ann|anime|8951}}

{{Production I.G}}
{{Noitamina}}

[[Category:Action anime and manga]]
[[Category:Anime of 2008]]
[[Category:Dengeki Comics]]
[[Category:Dengeki Daioh]]
[[Category:Manga of 2007]]
[[Category:Production I.G]]
[[Category:Science fiction anime and manga]]
[[Category:Shōjo]]
[[Category:Shōnen]]

[[de:Toshokan Sensō]]
[[ja:図書館戦争]]
[[ru:Toshokan Senso]]
[[zh:圖書館戰爭]]
[[fr:Toshokan Sensou]]

Commando Delta

2009-07-12T00:52:42Z

*SM*: LiveRC : Révocation des modifications de 83.202.199.105; retour à la version de Yotna

{{ébauche|histoire de France|Algérie}}
{{Infobox Groupe terroriste
| nom=Commandos Delta
| alias=
| classification = [[nationaliste]], [[Anti-indépendantisme|Anti-indépendantiste]]
| objectifs=garder l'Algérie française
| statut = Inactif
| victimes=
| date_formation=1961
| pays_origine={{ALG}}
| fondateur= [[Roger Degueldre]]
| nombre=
| zone_operation={{ALG}}, {{FRA}}
| derniere_attaque=4 mai 1978
| sources-financières=
| chefs_principaux =[[Roger Degueldre]], [[Albert Dovecar]], [[Wilfried Schliederman]], [[Jean-Pierre Ramos]], [[Jean-Loup Blanchy]], [[Josué Giner]], [[Gabriel Anglade]], [[Jacques Sintes]], [[Jo Rizza]], [[Joseph-Edouard Slama]], [[Paul Mancilla]], [[Marcel Ligier]], [[Jacques Bixio]]
| groupes-relies = [[OAS]], [[Honneur de la Police]]
}}
Les '''Commandos Delta''' étaient des groupes chargés des exécutions pour l'[[Organisation armée secrète]] ('''OAS'''). Ils « interdisaient » les quartiers européens aux musulmans en les assassinant. Ils furent fondés par le sous-lieutenant déserteur [[Roger Degueldre]] en 1961, qui les dirigea.

Ils furent également responsables de l'assassinat de plusieurs appelés du contingent français ainsi que des personnes considérées comme « molles » ou « traîtres » à la cause de l'[[Algérie française]]. Néanmoins, un certain nombre de ces meurtres ont pu être effectués par des [[barbouze]]s pour discréditer l'OAS : on parlait alors d'une organisation secrète autre que le [[Service d'action civique|SAC]] : [[La Main rouge (groupe terroriste)|la Main rouge]]. Il était, de fait, difficile de définir quelles actions était imputable ou non aux ''deltas'', étant donné que n'importe qui pouvait, vu la situation, faire tout et n'importe quoi.

L'OAS ayant part ailleurs « interdit » aux [[Pieds-Noirs]] de fuir, elle a largement contribué à élargir le fossé entre les communautés européenne et musulmane en Algérie, et donc indirectement à la fuite de la majorité du million de pieds-noirs vers la métropole française à la fin de la guerre. Néanmoins, beaucoup de pieds-noirs soutenaient l'action OAS.

==Organisation==
*BAO Bureau d'Action Opérationnelle (Lieutenant [[Roger Degueldre]], Adjoint Lieutenant Pierre Delhomme), chargé de l'exécution des opérations
**Commandos Delta (Lieutenant [[Roger Degueldre]])
*** Delta 1 ([[Albert Dovecar]])
*** Delta 2 ([[Wilfried Schliederman]])
*** Delta 3 ([[Jean-Pierre Ramos]])
*** Delta 4 (Lieutenant [[Jean-Loup Blanchy]])
*** Delta 5 ([[Josué Giner]], dit « Jésus de Bab-el-Oued »)
*** Delta 6 ([[Gabriel Anglade]])
*** Delta 7 ([[Jacques Sintes]])
*** Delta 9 ([[Jo Rizza]])
*** Delta 10 ([[Joseph-Edouard Slama]])
*** Delta 11 ([[Paul Mancilla]])
*** Delta 24 ([[Marcel Ligier]])
*** Delta 33 ([[Jacques Bixio]])

==Guerre d'Algérie==
Les ''deltas'' ont notamment participé aux événements suivants :
* [[Assassinat de Château-Royal]] : assassinat de six responsables de centres sociaux ;
* [[Opération Rock and Roll]] : cent vingt explosions en deux heures dans la nuit du 5 au 6 mars 1962 ;
* Meurtres d'appelés le 22 mars 1962<ref name="courriere">[[Yves Courrière]], ''La guerre d'Algérie'', tome 4 : ''Les feux du désespoir'', Fayard, 1969</ref> qui conduisit au bouclage de [[Bab El-Oued]] puis à la [[fusillade de la rue d'Isly]] suite à une contre-manifestation de l'OAS ;
* [[Opération Charlotte-Corday]] : attentat du [[Petit-Clamart]] contre le général [[De Gaulle]].

Plusieurs milliers de meurtres d'Algériens furent attribués à l'OAS.

==Pérennité des commandos Delta==
L'appellation, sans qu'on puisse remonter aux commandos Delta originaux, fut réutilisée pour revendiquer des attentats d'extrême-droite : 
*{{date|2|décembre|1977}} : Assassinat de Laïd Sebaï, gardien de l'Amicale des Algériens en Europe à Paris<ref>http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/search/IncidentSummary.aspx?gtdid=197712020001</ref>.
*{{date|4|décembre|1977}} : Attentat à la bombe contre un foyer de travailleurs algérien à Marange-Silvange<ref>http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/search/IncidentSummary.aspx?gtdid=197712040001</ref>.
*{{date|4|mai|1978}} : Assassinat d'[[Henri Curiel]] à Paris<ref>http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/search/IncidentSummary.aspx?gtdid=197805050001</ref>.

== Notes et références ==
<references/>

== Bibliographie ==
*[[Yves Courrière]], ''La guerre d'Algérie'', tome 4 : ''Les feux du désespoir'', [[Fayard (édition)|Fayard]], 1969
*Arnaud Déroulède, ''OAS : étude d'une organisation clandestine'', Curutchet, 1997
*Vincent Guibert, ''Les commandos Delta'', Curutchet, 2000
*[[Georges Fleury]], ''Histoire secrète de l'O.A.S.'', Grasset & Fasquelle, 2002
*[[Rémi Kauffer]], ''OAS : histoire d'une guerre franco-française'', Seuil, 2002

==Liens internes==
*[[Front de libération nationale (Algérie)|FLN]]

{{Portail|France|Algérie}}

[[Catégorie:Guerre d'Algérie]]
[[Catégorie:OAS]]
[[Catégorie:Terrorisme en France]]

Wikipedia - User contributions [en]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camille Lepage

Jacques Chirac

Wikipedia:SOPA initiative/Action

Don S. Williams

Iván Navarro (tennis)

Pierre Laurent (politician)

User talk:*SM*

User:*SM*

Tokyo Magnitude 8.0

Anna Fárová

Kaoru Tada

Masashi Ueda (manga artist)

Johnny Hallyday

Fumiya Satō

Motoka Murakami

Maki Murakami

Shirow Miwa

Shirow Miwa

Kou Fumizuki

Tsubasa Fukuchi

Richard Easterlin

Boyd Coddington

Kendall Myers

Parfait Tic!

Library War

Commando Delta

User talk:SM

User:SM