Talk:Console Enterprises

2016-06-27T22:23:28Z

4.35.151.35:

== More Recent Topics ==

* The product iconsole-micro was discontinued. There was no release 2015. Even the homepage shows errors as you can see here http://console.com.co/iconsole-micro The wiki needs to be updated.

** I agree, but with their “Teclast partnership” apparently about to gestate something, may be best to wait and see what comes out --- then rework it. [[Special:Contributions/4.35.151.35|4.35.151.35]] ([[User talk:4.35.151.35|talk]])

* Console, Inc. announced instead a partnership with Teclast: http://console.com.co/console-teclast-partnership/ However there is again no confirmation of Teclast. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/85.180.86.4|85.180.86.4]] ([[User talk:85.180.86.4|talk]]) 05:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC) 

** Common with Chinese companies. Most of Teclast’s site is in Chinese. Doubt Console would make it their focus without something in writing. Maybe Teclast doesn't trust Console yet until it comes up with sales to back its ego. [[Special:Contributions/4.35.151.35|4.35.151.35]] ([[User talk:4.35.151.35|talk]])

* After Console Inc. published the source code on Github they tried to get new developers with rewards http://console.com.co/devrewards/ The first cycle for rewards was from March to April. There is no proof / source that any developer got a reward.

** Worth asking, but sounds like Intel’s threatened pullout of Android played a role. That happened in May, right at the same time. Top article on their blog: http://console.com.co/thoughts-on-chips/ - Has anyone posted code and didn't get paid? Would be notable/relevant if so but sounds like it ran into that same issue with Intel. Would be surprised if Intel ripcorded on Android, but meh, hasn't been doing well for Intel either. They seem to keep falling all over themselves. [[Special:Contributions/4.35.151.35|4.35.151.35]] ([[User talk:4.35.151.35|talk]])

* The published Source code can officially be found here: https://github.com/iconsole There are is no new source either from Console, Inc. nor any other developers especially for ConsoleOS as you can see on the contribution page.

** I have read code comparisons - there are new drivers from Intel like the Gen 8 driver, but they don't seem enabled. There are significant changes, when you run it the UX is moderately different. For me, it's about the backstory and the cloak-and-dagger Google BS. [[Special:Contributions/4.35.151.35|4.35.151.35]] ([[User talk:4.35.151.35|talk]])

* The new version of ConsoleOS is not developed in the public with the community (lack of source code on Github). Proof of development for Android Marshmallow (next Vesion): "Console OS is moving to an experimental status, and we expect to ship Console OS Marshmallow later this summer. http://console.com.co/console-teclast-partnership/ — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/85.180.86.4|85.180.86.4]] ([[User talk:85.180.86.4|talk]]) 05:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC) 

** As XDA investigated, they can do that - just like any Android OEM. Even Cyanogen does that to a degree… Just like Google does with AOSP itself. At least they didn't close it up and claim it was unique where it wasn't after Google kibashed dual boot for everyone (''see ASUS Transformer Duet... I still want one of those''). [[Special:Contributions/4.35.151.35|4.35.151.35]] ([[User talk:4.35.151.35|talk]])

== Page currently about the wrong "company" ==
The Console Inc. referred to in this article is nothing more than a guy with a failed Kickstarter project (Console OS). He was previously masquerading under the name Mobile Media Ventures and told backers he was changing to Console Inc. but it appears that change never officially took place because there is already another Console Inc. with a real business run by real people http://console.to

More details here: http://www.consoleosripoff.com/showthread.php?tid=71&pid=111#pid111 [[User:Roddie Digital|roddie digital]] ([[User talk:Roddie Digital|talk]]) 13:29, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

* Just an FYI, I read the thread above and it appears to sort out later on. There is another company calling itself "Console" - but this company appears to exist, and appears to have filed valid dba paperwork. Unless the other company has a lawsuit/objection, there isn't likely an issue here. Two companies can share the same name, happens often. [[Special:Contributions/64.134.236.33|64.134.236.33]] ([[User talk:64.134.236.33|talk]]) 05:42, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

I second this, and marked the page for speedy deletion. The entity referenced to in this article:
- has no proven track record of any shipped physical product ("Console micro")
- their software product ("ConsoleOS") is a basically unaltered fork of first Android-IA and now Android-x86
- is highly likely an one-man operation

* I disagree, the controversey with forking Android-x86 is notable... and its origin as an Intel-backed project (alongside the suspiciously-killed Transformer Duet) is also intriuging. I forked this controversey into a new section, with an emphasis on neutrality... but I do not see it as lacking notability. [[Special:Contributions/64.134.236.33|64.134.236.33]] ([[User talk:64.134.236.33|talk]]) 05:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Given that not even Jide with a proven released RemixOS has a wiki here about them as a company, the subject should be deleted for a) insignificance and b) attempts of self-promotion.
[[User:UniversalNation|UniversalNation]] ([[User talk:UniversalNation|talk]]) 13:41, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Console Enterprises

2016-06-27T22:15:25Z

4.35.151.35: Reorganized talk, it had become disorganized - made no edits just moved more recent talk to a new thread

== More Recent Topics ==

* The product iconsole-micro was discontinued. There was no release 2015. Even the homepage shows errors as you can see here http://console.com.co/iconsole-micro The wiki needs to be updated.

* Console, Inc. announced instead a partnership with Teclast: http://console.com.co/console-teclast-partnership/ However there is again no confirmation of Teclast. — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/85.180.86.4|85.180.86.4]] ([[User talk:85.180.86.4|talk]]) 05:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC) 

* After Console Inc. published the source code on Github they tried to get new developers with rewards http://console.com.co/devrewards/ The first cycle for rewards was from March to April. There is no proof / source that any developer got a reward.

* The published Source code can officially be found here: https://github.com/iconsole There are is no new source either from Console, Inc. nor any other developers especially for ConsoleOS as you can see on the contribution page.

* The new version of ConsoleOS is not developed in the public with the community (lack of source code on Github). Proof of development for Android Marshmallow (next Vesion): "Console OS is moving to an experimental status, and we expect to ship Console OS Marshmallow later this summer. http://console.com.co/console-teclast-partnership/ — Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/85.180.86.4|85.180.86.4]] ([[User talk:85.180.86.4|talk]]) 05:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC) 

== Page currently about the wrong "company" ==
The Console Inc. referred to in this article is nothing more than a guy with a failed Kickstarter project (Console OS). He was previously masquerading under the name Mobile Media Ventures and told backers he was changing to Console Inc. but it appears that change never officially took place because there is already another Console Inc. with a real business run by real people http://console.to

More details here: http://www.consoleosripoff.com/showthread.php?tid=71&pid=111#pid111 [[User:Roddie Digital|roddie digital]] ([[User talk:Roddie Digital|talk]]) 13:29, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

* Just an FYI, I read the thread above and it appears to sort out later on. There is another company calling itself "Console" - but this company appears to exist, and appears to have filed valid dba paperwork. Unless the other company has a lawsuit/objection, there isn't likely an issue here. Two companies can share the same name, happens often. [[Special:Contributions/64.134.236.33|64.134.236.33]] ([[User talk:64.134.236.33|talk]]) 05:42, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

I second this, and marked the page for speedy deletion. The entity referenced to in this article:
- has no proven track record of any shipped physical product ("Console micro")
- their software product ("ConsoleOS") is a basically unaltered fork of first Android-IA and now Android-x86
- is highly likely an one-man operation

* I disagree, the controversey with forking Android-x86 is notable... and its origin as an Intel-backed project (alongside the suspiciously-killed Transformer Duet) is also intriuging. I forked this controversey into a new section, with an emphasis on neutrality... but I do not see it as lacking notability. [[Special:Contributions/64.134.236.33|64.134.236.33]] ([[User talk:64.134.236.33|talk]]) 05:39, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

Given that not even Jide with a proven released RemixOS has a wiki here about them as a company, the subject should be deleted for a) insignificance and b) attempts of self-promotion.
[[User:UniversalNation|UniversalNation]] ([[User talk:UniversalNation|talk]]) 13:41, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia - User contributions [en]

Talk:Console Enterprises

Talk:Console Enterprises