Infrared homing - Revision history

Electrou: Script-assisted fixes: per CS1 and MOS:ITALICS

2024-10-09T14:49:51Z

Script-assisted fixes: per CS1 and MOS:ITALICS

Electrou: added Category:Infrared using HotCat

2024-10-09T07:32:08Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 07:32, 9 October 2024
Line 218:		Line 218:
	[[Category:Infrared imaging]]		[[Category:Infrared imaging]]
	[[Category:Articles containing video clips]]		[[Category:Articles containing video clips]]
			[[Category:Infrared]]

Electrou: Removed unreliable source

2024-10-06T14:18:52Z

Removed unreliable source

← Previous revision		Revision as of 14:18, 6 October 2024
Line 75:		Line 75:
	New seeker designs began to appear during the 1970s and led to a series of more advanced missiles. A major upgrade to the Sidewinder began, providing it with a seeker that was sensitive enough to track from any angle, giving the missile ''all aspect'' capability for the first time. This was combined with a new scanning pattern that helped reject confusing sources (like the sun reflecting off clouds) and improve the guidance towards the target. A small number of the resulting L models were rushed to the UK just prior to their engagement in the [[Falklands War]], where they achieved an 82% kill ratio, and the misses were generally due to the target aircraft flying out of range.{{sfn\|Hollway\|2013}} The Argentine aircraft, equipped with Sidewinder B and [[R.550 Magic]], could only fire from the rear aspect, which the British pilots simply avoided by always flying directly at them. The L was so effective that aircraft hurried to add flare countermeasures, which led to another minor upgrade to the M model to better reject flares. The L and M models would go on to be the backbone of Western air forces through the end of the [[Cold War]] era.		New seeker designs began to appear during the 1970s and led to a series of more advanced missiles. A major upgrade to the Sidewinder began, providing it with a seeker that was sensitive enough to track from any angle, giving the missile ''all aspect'' capability for the first time. This was combined with a new scanning pattern that helped reject confusing sources (like the sun reflecting off clouds) and improve the guidance towards the target. A small number of the resulting L models were rushed to the UK just prior to their engagement in the [[Falklands War]], where they achieved an 82% kill ratio, and the misses were generally due to the target aircraft flying out of range.{{sfn\|Hollway\|2013}} The Argentine aircraft, equipped with Sidewinder B and [[R.550 Magic]], could only fire from the rear aspect, which the British pilots simply avoided by always flying directly at them. The L was so effective that aircraft hurried to add flare countermeasures, which led to another minor upgrade to the M model to better reject flares. The L and M models would go on to be the backbone of Western air forces through the end of the [[Cold War]] era.

	An even larger step was taken by the Soviets with their [[R-73 (missile)\|R-73]], which replaced the K-13 and others with a dramatically improved design. This missile introduced the ability to be fired at targets completely out of view of the seeker; after firing the missile would orient itself in the direction indicated by the launcher and then attempt to lock on. When combined with a [[helmet mounted sight]], the missile could be cued and targeted without the launch aircraft first having to point itself at the target. This proved to offer significant advantages in combat, and caused great concern for Western forces.<ref>{{cite web \|website=FAS \|title=AA-11 ARCHER R-73 \|url=http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/row/aa-11.htm \|date=3 September 2000 \|access-date=9 October 2015 \|archive-date=2 September 2016 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160902160451/http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/row/aa-11.htm \|url-status=dead }}</ref>		An even larger step was taken by the Soviets with their [[R-73 (missile)\|R-73]], which replaced the K-13 and others with a dramatically improved design. This missile introduced the ability to be fired at targets completely out of view of the seeker; after firing the missile would orient itself in the direction indicated by the launcher and then attempt to lock on. When combined with a [[helmet mounted sight]], the missile could be cued and targeted without the launch aircraft first having to point itself at the target. This proved to offer significant advantages in combat, and caused great concern for Western forces.<ref name=":0">{{cite web \|website=FAS \|title=AA-11 ARCHER R-73 \|url=http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/row/aa-11.htm \|date=3 September 2000 \|access-date=9 October 2015 \|archive-date=2 September 2016 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160902160451/http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/row/aa-11.htm \|url-status=dead }}</ref>

	The solution to the R-73 problem was initially going to be the [[ASRAAM]], a pan-European design that combined the performance of the R-73 with an imaging seeker. In a wide-ranging agreement, the US agreed to adopt ASRAAM for their new short-range missile, while the Europeans would adopt [[AMRAAM]] as their medium-range weapon. However, ASRAAM soon ran into intractable delays as each of the member countries decided a different performance metric was more important. The US eventually bowed out of the program, and instead adapted the new seekers developed for ASRAAM on yet another version of the Sidewinder, the AIM-9X. This so extends its lifetime that it will have been in service for almost a century when the current aircraft leave service. ASRAAM did, eventually, deliver a missile that has been adopted by a number of European forces and many of the same technologies have appeared in the Chinese PL-10 and Israeli [[Python (missile)\|Python-5]].		The solution to the R-73 problem was initially going to be the [[ASRAAM]], a pan-European design that combined the performance of the R-73 with an imaging seeker. In a wide-ranging agreement, the US agreed to adopt ASRAAM for their new short-range missile, while the Europeans would adopt [[AMRAAM]] as their medium-range weapon. However, ASRAAM soon ran into intractable delays as each of the member countries decided a different performance metric was more important. The US eventually bowed out of the program, and instead adapted the new seekers developed for ASRAAM on yet another version of the Sidewinder, the AIM-9X. This so extends its lifetime that it will have been in service for almost a century when the current aircraft leave service. ASRAAM did, eventually, deliver a missile that has been adopted by a number of European forces and many of the same technologies have appeared in the Chinese PL-10 and Israeli [[Python (missile)\|Python-5]].
Line 85:		Line 85:
	The Soviets started development of two almost identical weapons in 1964, Strela-1 and Strela-2. Development of these proceeded much more smoothly, as the [[9K32 Strela-2]] entered service in 1968 after fewer years of development than the Redeye.<ref>Jane's Land Based Air Defence 2005–2006.</ref> Originally a competing design, the [[9K31 Strela-1]] was instead greatly increased in size for vehicle applications and entered service at around the same time. The UK began development of its [[Blowpipe (missile)\|Blowpipe]] in 1975, but placed the seeker on the launcher instead of the missile itself. The seeker sensed both the target and the missile and sent corrections to the missile via a radio link. These early weapons proved ineffective, with the Blowpipe failing in almost every combat use,<ref>{{cite journal \|first1= Lester \|last1= Grau \|first2= Ali \|last2= Ahmad Jalali \|title= The Campaign For The Caves: The Battles for Zhawar in the Soviet-Afghan War \|journal= The Journal of Slavic Military Studies \|date= September 2001 \|url= http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|quote= 13 Blowpipe missiles fired for no hits \|doi= 10.1080/13518040108430488 \|volume= 14 \|issue= 3 \|pages= 69–92 \|s2cid= 144936749 \|url-status= dead \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20051113125550/http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|archive-date= 2005-11-13 \|url-access= subscription }}</ref> while the Redeye fared somewhat better. The Strela-2 did better and claimed a number of victories in the middle east and Vietnam.<ref name="Arms-Expo.ru">{{cite web\|url=http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110126065453/http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-date=2011-01-26 \|title="Стрела-2" (9К32, SA-7, Grail), переносный зенитный ракетный комплекс — ОРУЖИЕ РОССИИ, Информационное агентство \|publisher=Arms-expo.ru \|access-date=2013-08-24}}</ref>		The Soviets started development of two almost identical weapons in 1964, Strela-1 and Strela-2. Development of these proceeded much more smoothly, as the [[9K32 Strela-2]] entered service in 1968 after fewer years of development than the Redeye.<ref>Jane's Land Based Air Defence 2005–2006.</ref> Originally a competing design, the [[9K31 Strela-1]] was instead greatly increased in size for vehicle applications and entered service at around the same time. The UK began development of its [[Blowpipe (missile)\|Blowpipe]] in 1975, but placed the seeker on the launcher instead of the missile itself. The seeker sensed both the target and the missile and sent corrections to the missile via a radio link. These early weapons proved ineffective, with the Blowpipe failing in almost every combat use,<ref>{{cite journal \|first1= Lester \|last1= Grau \|first2= Ali \|last2= Ahmad Jalali \|title= The Campaign For The Caves: The Battles for Zhawar in the Soviet-Afghan War \|journal= The Journal of Slavic Military Studies \|date= September 2001 \|url= http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|quote= 13 Blowpipe missiles fired for no hits \|doi= 10.1080/13518040108430488 \|volume= 14 \|issue= 3 \|pages= 69–92 \|s2cid= 144936749 \|url-status= dead \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20051113125550/http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|archive-date= 2005-11-13 \|url-access= subscription }}</ref> while the Redeye fared somewhat better. The Strela-2 did better and claimed a number of victories in the middle east and Vietnam.<ref name="Arms-Expo.ru">{{cite web\|url=http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110126065453/http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-date=2011-01-26 \|title="Стрела-2" (9К32, SA-7, Grail), переносный зенитный ракетный комплекс — ОРУЖИЕ РОССИИ, Информационное агентство \|publisher=Arms-expo.ru \|access-date=2013-08-24}}</ref>

	A major upgrade program for the Redeye started in 1967, as the Redeye II. Testing did not begin until 1975 and the first deliveries of the now renamed [[FIM-92 Stinger]] began in 1978. An improved rosette seeker was added to the B model in 1983, and several additional upgrades followed. Sent to the [[Soviet–Afghan War]], they claimed a 79% success rate against Soviet helicopters,<ref>{{cite book \|first1= Ray \|last1=Bonds \|first2=David l\|last2=Miller \|title= Illustrated Directory of Special Forces \|date=13 February 2003 \|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FMgpdulJsGgC&pg=PA359 \|page=359\|publisher=Voyageur Press \|isbn=9780760314197 }}</ref> although this is debated.<ref>{{cite web \|first= Leonard \|last= Leshuk \|title= Stinger Missiles in Afghanistan \|date= 2008 \|url= http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|access-date= 2015-09-16 \|archive-date= 2017-12-26 \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20171226014714/http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|url-status= live }}</ref> The Soviets likewise improved their own versions, introducing the [[9K34 Strela-3]] in 1974, and the greatly improved dual-frequency [[9K38 Igla]] in 1983, and Igla-S in 2004.<ref~~>{{cite~~ ~~web \|url~~=~~http~~://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|title=9K338 9M342 Igla-S / SA-24 Grinch \|website=Globalsecurity \|access-date=2015-10-09 \|archive-date=2011-12-04 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111204154628/http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|url-status=live ~~}}<~~/~~ref~~>		A major upgrade program for the Redeye started in 1967, as the Redeye II. Testing did not begin until 1975 and the first deliveries of the now renamed [[FIM-92 Stinger]] began in 1978. An improved rosette seeker was added to the B model in 1983, and several additional upgrades followed. Sent to the [[Soviet–Afghan War]], they claimed a 79% success rate against Soviet helicopters,<ref>{{cite book \|first1= Ray \|last1=Bonds \|first2=David l\|last2=Miller \|title= Illustrated Directory of Special Forces \|date=13 February 2003 \|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FMgpdulJsGgC&pg=PA359 \|page=359\|publisher=Voyageur Press \|isbn=9780760314197 }}</ref> although this is debated.<ref>{{cite web \|first= Leonard \|last= Leshuk \|title= Stinger Missiles in Afghanistan \|date= 2008 \|url= http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|access-date= 2015-09-16 \|archive-date= 2017-12-26 \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20171226014714/http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|url-status= live }}</ref> The Soviets likewise improved their own versions, introducing the [[9K34 Strela-3]] in 1974, and the greatly improved dual-frequency [[9K38 Igla]] in 1983, and Igla-S in 2004.<ref name=":0" />

	== Seeker types ==		== Seeker types ==

Electrou: Open access status updates in citations with OAbot #oabot

2024-10-06T14:06:25Z

Open access status updates in citations with OAbot #oabot

← Previous revision		Revision as of 14:06, 6 October 2024
Line 83:		Line 83:
	Based on the same general principles as the original Sidewinder, in 1955 [[Convair]] began studies on a small man-portable missile ([[MANPADS]]) that would emerge as the [[FIM-43 Redeye]]. Entering testing in 1961, the preliminary design proved to have poor performance, and a number of major upgrades followed. It was not until 1968 that the Block III version was put into production.<ref name="Cagle-1974">{{cite tech report \|first=Mary \|last=Cagle \|title=History of the Redeye Weapon System \|publisher=Historical Division, Army Missile Command \|date=23 May 1974 \|url=https://fas.org/asmp/campaigns/MANPADS/2005/redeye.pdf \|access-date=11 September 2015 \|archive-date=29 March 2016 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160329151913/https://fas.org/asmp/campaigns/MANPADS/2005/redeye.pdf \|url-status=dead }}</ref>		Based on the same general principles as the original Sidewinder, in 1955 [[Convair]] began studies on a small man-portable missile ([[MANPADS]]) that would emerge as the [[FIM-43 Redeye]]. Entering testing in 1961, the preliminary design proved to have poor performance, and a number of major upgrades followed. It was not until 1968 that the Block III version was put into production.<ref name="Cagle-1974">{{cite tech report \|first=Mary \|last=Cagle \|title=History of the Redeye Weapon System \|publisher=Historical Division, Army Missile Command \|date=23 May 1974 \|url=https://fas.org/asmp/campaigns/MANPADS/2005/redeye.pdf \|access-date=11 September 2015 \|archive-date=29 March 2016 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160329151913/https://fas.org/asmp/campaigns/MANPADS/2005/redeye.pdf \|url-status=dead }}</ref>

	The Soviets started development of two almost identical weapons in 1964, Strela-1 and Strela-2. Development of these proceeded much more smoothly, as the [[9K32 Strela-2]] entered service in 1968 after fewer years of development than the Redeye.<ref>Jane's Land Based Air Defence 2005–2006.</ref> Originally a competing design, the [[9K31 Strela-1]] was instead greatly increased in size for vehicle applications and entered service at around the same time. The UK began development of its [[Blowpipe (missile)\|Blowpipe]] in 1975, but placed the seeker on the launcher instead of the missile itself. The seeker sensed both the target and the missile and sent corrections to the missile via a radio link. These early weapons proved ineffective, with the Blowpipe failing in almost every combat use,<ref>{{cite journal \|first1= Lester \|last1= Grau \|first2= Ali \|last2= Ahmad Jalali \|title= The Campaign For The Caves: The Battles for Zhawar in the Soviet-Afghan War \|journal= The Journal of Slavic Military Studies \|date= September 2001 \|url= http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|quote= 13 Blowpipe missiles fired for no hits \|doi= 10.1080/13518040108430488 \|volume= 14 \|issue= 3 \|pages= 69–92 \|s2cid= 144936749 \|url-status= dead \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20051113125550/http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|archive-date= 2005-11-13 }}</ref> while the Redeye fared somewhat better. The Strela-2 did better and claimed a number of victories in the middle east and Vietnam.<ref name="Arms-Expo.ru">{{cite web\|url=http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110126065453/http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-date=2011-01-26 \|title="Стрела-2" (9К32, SA-7, Grail), переносный зенитный ракетный комплекс — ОРУЖИЕ РОССИИ, Информационное агентство \|publisher=Arms-expo.ru \|access-date=2013-08-24}}</ref>		The Soviets started development of two almost identical weapons in 1964, Strela-1 and Strela-2. Development of these proceeded much more smoothly, as the [[9K32 Strela-2]] entered service in 1968 after fewer years of development than the Redeye.<ref>Jane's Land Based Air Defence 2005–2006.</ref> Originally a competing design, the [[9K31 Strela-1]] was instead greatly increased in size for vehicle applications and entered service at around the same time. The UK began development of its [[Blowpipe (missile)\|Blowpipe]] in 1975, but placed the seeker on the launcher instead of the missile itself. The seeker sensed both the target and the missile and sent corrections to the missile via a radio link. These early weapons proved ineffective, with the Blowpipe failing in almost every combat use,<ref>{{cite journal \|first1= Lester \|last1= Grau \|first2= Ali \|last2= Ahmad Jalali \|title= The Campaign For The Caves: The Battles for Zhawar in the Soviet-Afghan War \|journal= The Journal of Slavic Military Studies \|date= September 2001 \|url= http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|quote= 13 Blowpipe missiles fired for no hits \|doi= 10.1080/13518040108430488 \|volume= 14 \|issue= 3 \|pages= 69–92 \|s2cid= 144936749 \|url-status= dead \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20051113125550/http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|archive-date= 2005-11-13 \|url-access= subscription }}</ref> while the Redeye fared somewhat better. The Strela-2 did better and claimed a number of victories in the middle east and Vietnam.<ref name="Arms-Expo.ru">{{cite web\|url=http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110126065453/http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-date=2011-01-26 \|title="Стрела-2" (9К32, SA-7, Grail), переносный зенитный ракетный комплекс — ОРУЖИЕ РОССИИ, Информационное агентство \|publisher=Arms-expo.ru \|access-date=2013-08-24}}</ref>

	A major upgrade program for the Redeye started in 1967, as the Redeye II. Testing did not begin until 1975 and the first deliveries of the now renamed [[FIM-92 Stinger]] began in 1978. An improved rosette seeker was added to the B model in 1983, and several additional upgrades followed. Sent to the [[Soviet–Afghan War]], they claimed a 79% success rate against Soviet helicopters,<ref>{{cite book \|first1= Ray \|last1=Bonds \|first2=David l\|last2=Miller \|title= Illustrated Directory of Special Forces \|date=13 February 2003 \|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FMgpdulJsGgC&pg=PA359 \|page=359\|publisher=Voyageur Press \|isbn=9780760314197 }}</ref> although this is debated.<ref>{{cite web \|first= Leonard \|last= Leshuk \|title= Stinger Missiles in Afghanistan \|date= 2008 \|url= http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|access-date= 2015-09-16 \|archive-date= 2017-12-26 \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20171226014714/http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|url-status= live }}</ref> The Soviets likewise improved their own versions, introducing the [[9K34 Strela-3]] in 1974, and the greatly improved dual-frequency [[9K38 Igla]] in 1983, and Igla-S in 2004.<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|title=9K338 9M342 Igla-S / SA-24 Grinch \|website=Globalsecurity \|access-date=2015-10-09 \|archive-date=2011-12-04 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111204154628/http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|url-status=live }}</ref>		A major upgrade program for the Redeye started in 1967, as the Redeye II. Testing did not begin until 1975 and the first deliveries of the now renamed [[FIM-92 Stinger]] began in 1978. An improved rosette seeker was added to the B model in 1983, and several additional upgrades followed. Sent to the [[Soviet–Afghan War]], they claimed a 79% success rate against Soviet helicopters,<ref>{{cite book \|first1= Ray \|last1=Bonds \|first2=David l\|last2=Miller \|title= Illustrated Directory of Special Forces \|date=13 February 2003 \|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FMgpdulJsGgC&pg=PA359 \|page=359\|publisher=Voyageur Press \|isbn=9780760314197 }}</ref> although this is debated.<ref>{{cite web \|first= Leonard \|last= Leshuk \|title= Stinger Missiles in Afghanistan \|date= 2008 \|url= http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|access-date= 2015-09-16 \|archive-date= 2017-12-26 \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20171226014714/http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|url-status= live }}</ref> The Soviets likewise improved their own versions, introducing the [[9K34 Strela-3]] in 1974, and the greatly improved dual-frequency [[9K38 Igla]] in 1983, and Igla-S in 2004.<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|title=9K338 9M342 Igla-S / SA-24 Grinch \|website=Globalsecurity \|access-date=2015-10-09 \|archive-date=2011-12-04 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111204154628/http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|url-status=live }}</ref>

Electrou: Cleaned up using AutoEd, unpiped links using script

2024-10-06T12:25:31Z

Cleaned up using AutoEd, unpiped links using script

Show changes

Electrou: Renamed references using RefRenamer

2024-10-06T12:23:11Z

Renamed references using RefRenamer

Show changes

Electrou: Rescuing 5 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5

2024-10-06T12:03:50Z

Rescuing 5 sources and tagging 0 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5

← Previous revision		Revision as of 12:03, 6 October 2024
Line 56:		Line 56:
	In the post-war era, as the German developments became better known, a variety of research projects began to develop seekers based on the PbS sensor. These were combined with techniques developed during the war to improve accuracy of otherwise inherently inaccurate radar systems, especially the [[conical scanning]] system. One such system developed by the [[US Army Air Force]] (USAAF), known as the "Sun Tracker", was being developed as a possible guidance system for an [[intercontinental ballistic missile]]. Testing this system led to the [[1948 Lake Mead Boeing B-29 crash]].<ref>{{cite journal \|first=Julian \|last=Smith \|title=Dive Bomber \|journal= Smithsonian Magazine \|date=October 2005 \|url=http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/dive-bomber-70888901}}</ref>		In the post-war era, as the German developments became better known, a variety of research projects began to develop seekers based on the PbS sensor. These were combined with techniques developed during the war to improve accuracy of otherwise inherently inaccurate radar systems, especially the [[conical scanning]] system. One such system developed by the [[US Army Air Force]] (USAAF), known as the "Sun Tracker", was being developed as a possible guidance system for an [[intercontinental ballistic missile]]. Testing this system led to the [[1948 Lake Mead Boeing B-29 crash]].<ref>{{cite journal \|first=Julian \|last=Smith \|title=Dive Bomber \|journal= Smithsonian Magazine \|date=October 2005 \|url=http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/dive-bomber-70888901}}</ref>

	USAAF project MX-798 was awarded to [[Hughes Aircraft]] in 1946 for an infrared tracking missile. The design used a simple reticle seeker and an active system to control roll during flight. This was replaced the next year by MX-904, calling for a supersonic version. At this stage the concept was for a defensive weapon fired rearward out of a long tube at the back end of [[bomber aircraft]]. In April 1949 the [[AAM-A-1 Firebird\|Firebird]] missile project was cancelled and MX-904 was redirected to be a forward-firing fighter weapon.<ref>{{cite journal \|first= Sean \|last=O'Connor \|title= Arming America's Interceptors: The Hughes Falcon Missile Family \|date= June 2011 \|website=Airpower Australia \|pages=1 \|url=http://www.ausairpower.net/Falcon-Evolution.html}}</ref> The first test firings began in 1949, when it was given the designation AAM-A-2 (Air-to-air Missile, Air force, model 2) and the name Falcon. IR and [[semi-active radar homing]] (SARH) versions both entered service in 1956, and became known as the [[AIM-4 Falcon]] after 1962. The Falcon was a complex system offering limited performance, especially due to its lack of a proximity fuse, and managed only a 9% kill ratio in 54 firings during [[Operation Rolling Thunder]] in the [[Vietnam War]].<ref name=dirty>{{cite book \|first1=James \|last1=Dunnigan \|first2=Albert \|last2=Nofi \|title= Dirty Little Secrets of the Vietnam War \|publisher= Macmillan \|date= 2014 \|pages=118–120}}</ref> However, this relatively low success rate must be appreciated in the context of all these kills representing direct hits, something that was not true of every kill by other American AAMs.		USAAF project MX-798 was awarded to [[Hughes Aircraft]] in 1946 for an infrared tracking missile. The design used a simple reticle seeker and an active system to control roll during flight. This was replaced the next year by MX-904, calling for a supersonic version. At this stage the concept was for a defensive weapon fired rearward out of a long tube at the back end of [[bomber aircraft]]. In April 1949 the [[AAM-A-1 Firebird\|Firebird]] missile project was cancelled and MX-904 was redirected to be a forward-firing fighter weapon.<ref>{{cite journal \|first= Sean \|last= O'Connor \|title= Arming America's Interceptors: The Hughes Falcon Missile Family \|date= June 2011 \|website= Airpower Australia \|pages= 1 \|url= http://www.ausairpower.net/Falcon-Evolution.html \|access-date= 2015-09-14 \|archive-date= 2015-09-08 \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150908124557/http://www.ausairpower.net/Falcon-Evolution.html \|url-status= live }}</ref> The first test firings began in 1949, when it was given the designation AAM-A-2 (Air-to-air Missile, Air force, model 2) and the name Falcon. IR and [[semi-active radar homing]] (SARH) versions both entered service in 1956, and became known as the [[AIM-4 Falcon]] after 1962. The Falcon was a complex system offering limited performance, especially due to its lack of a proximity fuse, and managed only a 9% kill ratio in 54 firings during [[Operation Rolling Thunder]] in the [[Vietnam War]].<ref name=dirty>{{cite book \|first1=James \|last1=Dunnigan \|first2=Albert \|last2=Nofi \|title= Dirty Little Secrets of the Vietnam War \|publisher= Macmillan \|date= 2014 \|pages=118–120}}</ref> However, this relatively low success rate must be appreciated in the context of all these kills representing direct hits, something that was not true of every kill by other American AAMs.

	In the same year as MX-798, 1946, [[William B. McLean]] began studies of a similar concept at the Naval Ordnance Test Station, today known as [[Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake]]. He spent three years simply considering various designs, which led to a considerably less complicated design than the Falcon. When his team had a design they believed would be workable, they began trying to fit it to the newly introduced [[Zuni (rocket)\|Zuni 5-inch rocket]]. They presented it in 1951 and it became an official project the next year. [[Wally Schirra]] recalls visiting the lab and watching the seeker follow his cigarette.{{sfn\|Hollway\|2013}} The missile was given the name [[AIM-9_Sidewinder\|Sidewinder]] after a local snake; the name had a second significance as the [[Crotalus cerastes\|sidewinder]] is a [[pit viper]] and hunts by heat, and moves in an undulating pattern not unlike the missile.<ref>{{cite journal \|first=Preston \|last=Lerner \|title=Sidewinder \|journal=Air and Space Magazine \|date=November 2010 \|url=http://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviation/sidewinder-57687913/?no-ist}}</ref> The Sidewinder entered service in 1957, and was widely used during the Vietnam war. It proved to be a better weapon than the Falcon: B models managed a 14% kill ratio, while the much longer-ranged D models managed 19%. Its performance and lower cost led the Air Force to adopt it as well.<ref name=dirty/><ref>{{cite encyclopedia \|first=Marcelle \|last=Size Knaak \|title=F-4E \|encyclopedia= Encyclopedia of US Air Force aircraft and missile systems \|publisher= US Air Force History Office, DIANE Publishing \|date=1978 \|page=278 }}</ref>		In the same year as MX-798, 1946, [[William B. McLean]] began studies of a similar concept at the Naval Ordnance Test Station, today known as [[Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake]]. He spent three years simply considering various designs, which led to a considerably less complicated design than the Falcon. When his team had a design they believed would be workable, they began trying to fit it to the newly introduced [[Zuni (rocket)\|Zuni 5-inch rocket]]. They presented it in 1951 and it became an official project the next year. [[Wally Schirra]] recalls visiting the lab and watching the seeker follow his cigarette.{{sfn\|Hollway\|2013}} The missile was given the name [[AIM-9_Sidewinder\|Sidewinder]] after a local snake; the name had a second significance as the [[Crotalus cerastes\|sidewinder]] is a [[pit viper]] and hunts by heat, and moves in an undulating pattern not unlike the missile.<ref>{{cite journal \|first=Preston \|last=Lerner \|title=Sidewinder \|journal=Air and Space Magazine \|date=November 2010 \|url=http://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviation/sidewinder-57687913/?no-ist \|access-date=2015-09-11 \|archive-date=2015-10-02 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151002230107/http://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviation/sidewinder-57687913/?no-ist \|url-status=live }}</ref> The Sidewinder entered service in 1957, and was widely used during the Vietnam war. It proved to be a better weapon than the Falcon: B models managed a 14% kill ratio, while the much longer-ranged D models managed 19%. Its performance and lower cost led the Air Force to adopt it as well.<ref name=dirty/><ref>{{cite encyclopedia \|first=Marcelle \|last=Size Knaak \|title=F-4E \|encyclopedia= Encyclopedia of US Air Force aircraft and missile systems \|publisher= US Air Force History Office, DIANE Publishing \|date=1978 \|page=278 }}</ref>

	The first heat-seeker built outside the US was the UK's [[de Havilland Firestreak]]. Development began as OR.1056 [[Red Hawk missile\|Red Hawk]], but this was considered too advanced, and in 1951 an amended concept was released as OR.1117 and given the code name [[Blue Jay (missile)\|Blue Jay]]. Designed as an anti-bomber weapon, the Blue Jay was larger, much heavier and flew faster than its US counterparts, but had about the same range. It had a more advanced seeker, using PbTe and cooled to −180 °C (−292.0 °F) by [[anhydrous ammonia]] to improve its performance. One distinguishing feature was its faceted nose cone, which was selected after it was found ice would build up on a more conventional hemispherical dome. The first test firing took place in 1955 and it entered service with the [[Royal Air Force]] in August 1958.<ref>{{Cite book \| last1 = Gibson\| first1 = Chris \| first2 = Tony\| last2 = Buttler \| title = British Secret Projects: Hypersonics, Ramjets and Missiles \| publisher = Midland \| date= 2007 \| pages = 33–35 }}</ref>		The first heat-seeker built outside the US was the UK's [[de Havilland Firestreak]]. Development began as OR.1056 [[Red Hawk missile\|Red Hawk]], but this was considered too advanced, and in 1951 an amended concept was released as OR.1117 and given the code name [[Blue Jay (missile)\|Blue Jay]]. Designed as an anti-bomber weapon, the Blue Jay was larger, much heavier and flew faster than its US counterparts, but had about the same range. It had a more advanced seeker, using PbTe and cooled to −180 °C (−292.0 °F) by [[anhydrous ammonia]] to improve its performance. One distinguishing feature was its faceted nose cone, which was selected after it was found ice would build up on a more conventional hemispherical dome. The first test firing took place in 1955 and it entered service with the [[Royal Air Force]] in August 1958.<ref>{{Cite book \| last1 = Gibson\| first1 = Chris \| first2 = Tony\| last2 = Buttler \| title = British Secret Projects: Hypersonics, Ramjets and Missiles \| publisher = Midland \| date= 2007 \| pages = 33–35 }}</ref>
Line 71:		Line 71:
	[[File:R-73.jpg\|thumb\|right\|The R-73 was a leap forward for Soviet designs, and cause for considerable worry among western air forces.]]		[[File:R-73.jpg\|thumb\|right\|The R-73 was a leap forward for Soviet designs, and cause for considerable worry among western air forces.]]

	As Vietnam revealed the terrible performance of existing missile designs, a number of efforts began to address them. In the US, minor upgrades to the Sidewinder were carried out as soon as possible, but more broadly pilots were taught proper engagement techniques so they would not fire as soon as they heard the missile tone, and would instead move to a position where the missile would be able to continue tracking even after launch. This problem also led to efforts to make new missiles that would hit their targets even if launched under these less-than-ideal positions. In the UK this led to the [[SRAAM]] project, which was ultimately the victim of continually changing requirements.<ref>{{cite journal \|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1981/1981%20-%201812.html \|title=ASRAAM - Europe's new dogfight missile \|journal=Flight International \|date= 6 June 1981 \|page=1742}}</ref> Two US programmes, [[AIM-82]] and [[AIM-95 Agile]], met similar fates.<ref>{{cite journal \|title=Naval Weapons Center AIM-95 Agile \|journal=Flight International \|date=8 May 1975 \|page=765}}</ref>		As Vietnam revealed the terrible performance of existing missile designs, a number of efforts began to address them. In the US, minor upgrades to the Sidewinder were carried out as soon as possible, but more broadly pilots were taught proper engagement techniques so they would not fire as soon as they heard the missile tone, and would instead move to a position where the missile would be able to continue tracking even after launch. This problem also led to efforts to make new missiles that would hit their targets even if launched under these less-than-ideal positions. In the UK this led to the [[SRAAM]] project, which was ultimately the victim of continually changing requirements.<ref>{{cite journal \|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1981/1981%20-%201812.html \|title=ASRAAM - Europe's new dogfight missile \|journal=Flight International \|date=6 June 1981 \|page=1742 \|access-date=9 October 2015 \|archive-date=7 January 2018 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180107232853/https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1981/1981%20-%201812.html \|url-status=live }}</ref> Two US programmes, [[AIM-82]] and [[AIM-95 Agile]], met similar fates.<ref>{{cite journal \|title=Naval Weapons Center AIM-95 Agile \|journal=Flight International \|date=8 May 1975 \|page=765}}</ref>

	New seeker designs began to appear during the 1970s and led to a series of more advanced missiles. A major upgrade to the Sidewinder began, providing it with a seeker that was sensitive enough to track from any angle, giving the missile ''all aspect'' capability for the first time. This was combined with a new scanning pattern that helped reject confusing sources (like the sun reflecting off clouds) and improve the guidance towards the target. A small number of the resulting L models were rushed to the UK just prior to their engagement in the [[Falklands War]], where they achieved an 82% kill ratio, and the misses were generally due to the target aircraft flying out of range.{{sfn\|Hollway\|2013}} The Argentine aircraft, equipped with Sidewinder B and [[R.550 Magic]], could only fire from the rear aspect, which the British pilots simply avoided by always flying directly at them. The L was so effective that aircraft hurried to add flare countermeasures, which led to another minor upgrade to the M model to better reject flares. The L and M models would go on to be the backbone of Western air forces through the end of the [[Cold War]] era.		New seeker designs began to appear during the 1970s and led to a series of more advanced missiles. A major upgrade to the Sidewinder began, providing it with a seeker that was sensitive enough to track from any angle, giving the missile ''all aspect'' capability for the first time. This was combined with a new scanning pattern that helped reject confusing sources (like the sun reflecting off clouds) and improve the guidance towards the target. A small number of the resulting L models were rushed to the UK just prior to their engagement in the [[Falklands War]], where they achieved an 82% kill ratio, and the misses were generally due to the target aircraft flying out of range.{{sfn\|Hollway\|2013}} The Argentine aircraft, equipped with Sidewinder B and [[R.550 Magic]], could only fire from the rear aspect, which the British pilots simply avoided by always flying directly at them. The L was so effective that aircraft hurried to add flare countermeasures, which led to another minor upgrade to the M model to better reject flares. The L and M models would go on to be the backbone of Western air forces through the end of the [[Cold War]] era.
Line 85:		Line 85:
	The Soviets started development of two almost identical weapons in 1964, Strela-1 and Strela-2. Development of these proceeded much more smoothly, as the [[9K32 Strela-2]] entered service in 1968 after fewer years of development than the Redeye.<ref>Jane's Land Based Air Defence 2005–2006.</ref> Originally a competing design, the [[9K31 Strela-1]] was instead greatly increased in size for vehicle applications and entered service at around the same time. The UK began development of its [[Blowpipe (missile)\|Blowpipe]] in 1975, but placed the seeker on the launcher instead of the missile itself. The seeker sensed both the target and the missile and sent corrections to the missile via a radio link. These early weapons proved ineffective, with the Blowpipe failing in almost every combat use,<ref>{{cite journal \|first1= Lester \|last1= Grau \|first2= Ali \|last2= Ahmad Jalali \|title= The Campaign For The Caves: The Battles for Zhawar in the Soviet-Afghan War \|journal= The Journal of Slavic Military Studies \|date= September 2001 \|url= http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|quote= 13 Blowpipe missiles fired for no hits \|doi= 10.1080/13518040108430488 \|volume= 14 \|issue= 3 \|pages= 69–92 \|s2cid= 144936749 \|url-status= dead \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20051113125550/http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|archive-date= 2005-11-13 }}</ref> while the Redeye fared somewhat better. The Strela-2 did better and claimed a number of victories in the middle east and Vietnam.<ref name="Arms-Expo.ru">{{cite web\|url=http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110126065453/http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-date=2011-01-26 \|title="Стрела-2" (9К32, SA-7, Grail), переносный зенитный ракетный комплекс — ОРУЖИЕ РОССИИ, Информационное агентство \|publisher=Arms-expo.ru \|access-date=2013-08-24}}</ref>		The Soviets started development of two almost identical weapons in 1964, Strela-1 and Strela-2. Development of these proceeded much more smoothly, as the [[9K32 Strela-2]] entered service in 1968 after fewer years of development than the Redeye.<ref>Jane's Land Based Air Defence 2005–2006.</ref> Originally a competing design, the [[9K31 Strela-1]] was instead greatly increased in size for vehicle applications and entered service at around the same time. The UK began development of its [[Blowpipe (missile)\|Blowpipe]] in 1975, but placed the seeker on the launcher instead of the missile itself. The seeker sensed both the target and the missile and sent corrections to the missile via a radio link. These early weapons proved ineffective, with the Blowpipe failing in almost every combat use,<ref>{{cite journal \|first1= Lester \|last1= Grau \|first2= Ali \|last2= Ahmad Jalali \|title= The Campaign For The Caves: The Battles for Zhawar in the Soviet-Afghan War \|journal= The Journal of Slavic Military Studies \|date= September 2001 \|url= http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|quote= 13 Blowpipe missiles fired for no hits \|doi= 10.1080/13518040108430488 \|volume= 14 \|issue= 3 \|pages= 69–92 \|s2cid= 144936749 \|url-status= dead \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20051113125550/http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|archive-date= 2005-11-13 }}</ref> while the Redeye fared somewhat better. The Strela-2 did better and claimed a number of victories in the middle east and Vietnam.<ref name="Arms-Expo.ru">{{cite web\|url=http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110126065453/http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-date=2011-01-26 \|title="Стрела-2" (9К32, SA-7, Grail), переносный зенитный ракетный комплекс — ОРУЖИЕ РОССИИ, Информационное агентство \|publisher=Arms-expo.ru \|access-date=2013-08-24}}</ref>

	A major upgrade program for the Redeye started in 1967, as the Redeye II. Testing did not begin until 1975 and the first deliveries of the now renamed [[FIM-92 Stinger]] began in 1978. An improved rosette seeker was added to the B model in 1983, and several additional upgrades followed. Sent to the [[Soviet–Afghan War]], they claimed a 79% success rate against Soviet helicopters,<ref>{{cite book \|first1= Ray \|last1=Bonds \|first2=David l\|last2=Miller \|title= Illustrated Directory of Special Forces \|date=13 February 2003 \|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FMgpdulJsGgC&pg=PA359 \|page=359\|publisher=Voyageur Press \|isbn=9780760314197 }}</ref> although this is debated.<ref>{{cite web \|first= Leonard \|last= Leshuk \|title=Stinger Missiles in Afghanistan \|date=2008 \|url=http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html}}</ref> The Soviets likewise improved their own versions, introducing the [[9K34 Strela-3]] in 1974, and the greatly improved dual-frequency [[9K38 Igla]] in 1983, and Igla-S in 2004.<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|title=9K338 9M342 Igla-S / SA-24 Grinch \|website=Globalsecurity }}</ref>		A major upgrade program for the Redeye started in 1967, as the Redeye II. Testing did not begin until 1975 and the first deliveries of the now renamed [[FIM-92 Stinger]] began in 1978. An improved rosette seeker was added to the B model in 1983, and several additional upgrades followed. Sent to the [[Soviet–Afghan War]], they claimed a 79% success rate against Soviet helicopters,<ref>{{cite book \|first1= Ray \|last1=Bonds \|first2=David l\|last2=Miller \|title= Illustrated Directory of Special Forces \|date=13 February 2003 \|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FMgpdulJsGgC&pg=PA359 \|page=359\|publisher=Voyageur Press \|isbn=9780760314197 }}</ref> although this is debated.<ref>{{cite web \|first= Leonard \|last= Leshuk \|title= Stinger Missiles in Afghanistan \|date= 2008 \|url= http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|access-date= 2015-09-16 \|archive-date= 2017-12-26 \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20171226014714/http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|url-status= live }}</ref> The Soviets likewise improved their own versions, introducing the [[9K34 Strela-3]] in 1974, and the greatly improved dual-frequency [[9K38 Igla]] in 1983, and Igla-S in 2004.<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|title=9K338 9M342 Igla-S / SA-24 Grinch \|website=Globalsecurity \|access-date=2015-10-09 \|archive-date=2011-12-04 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111204154628/http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|url-status=live }}</ref>

	== Seeker types ==		== Seeker types ==

Kvng: tag engvar. grammar.

2024-09-17T15:28:27Z

tag engvar. grammar.

Show changes

InternetArchiveBot: Rescuing 0 sources and tagging 1 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5

2024-09-07T01:30:18Z

Rescuing 0 sources and tagging 1 as dead.) #IABot (v2.0.9.5

← Previous revision		Revision as of 01:30, 7 September 2024
Line 33:		Line 33:
	In Germany, radar research was not given nearly the same level of support as in the UK, and competed with IR development throughout the 1930s. IR research was led primarily by [[Edgar Kutzscher]] at the [[University of Berlin]]<ref>{{cite book \|first=Sean \|last=Johnston \|title=A History of Light and Colour Measurement: Science in the Shadows \|publisher=CRC Press \|date=2001 \|pages=224–225 \|isbn=9781420034776 \|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2wNVPfNkLpEC&pg=PA224}}</ref> working in concert with [[AEG (German company)\|AEG]].{{sfn\|Rogalski\|2000\|p=3}} By 1940 they had successfully developed one solution; the ''Spanner Anlage'' (roughly "Peeping Tom system") consisting of a detector photomultiplier placed in front of the pilot, and a large searchlight fitted with a filter to limit the output to the IR range. This provided enough light to see the target at short range, and ''Spanner Anlage'' was fitted to a small number of [[Messerschmitt Bf 110]] and [[Dornier Do 17]] [[night fighters]]. These proved largely useless in practice and the pilots complained that the target often only became visible at {{convert\|200\|m\|feet}}, at which point they would have seen it anyway.<ref>{{cite book \|first= Robert \|last=Forczyk \|title= Bf 110 vs Lancaster: 1942-45 \|publisher= Osprey Publishing \|date=2013 \|page=22}}</ref> Only 15 were built and were removed as German airborne radar systems improved though 1942.<ref>{{cite book \|first= Alastair \|last=Goodrum \|title= No Place for Chivalry \|date=2005 \|publisher=Grub Street \|page=109}}</ref>		In Germany, radar research was not given nearly the same level of support as in the UK, and competed with IR development throughout the 1930s. IR research was led primarily by [[Edgar Kutzscher]] at the [[University of Berlin]]<ref>{{cite book \|first=Sean \|last=Johnston \|title=A History of Light and Colour Measurement: Science in the Shadows \|publisher=CRC Press \|date=2001 \|pages=224–225 \|isbn=9781420034776 \|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2wNVPfNkLpEC&pg=PA224}}</ref> working in concert with [[AEG (German company)\|AEG]].{{sfn\|Rogalski\|2000\|p=3}} By 1940 they had successfully developed one solution; the ''Spanner Anlage'' (roughly "Peeping Tom system") consisting of a detector photomultiplier placed in front of the pilot, and a large searchlight fitted with a filter to limit the output to the IR range. This provided enough light to see the target at short range, and ''Spanner Anlage'' was fitted to a small number of [[Messerschmitt Bf 110]] and [[Dornier Do 17]] [[night fighters]]. These proved largely useless in practice and the pilots complained that the target often only became visible at {{convert\|200\|m\|feet}}, at which point they would have seen it anyway.<ref>{{cite book \|first= Robert \|last=Forczyk \|title= Bf 110 vs Lancaster: 1942-45 \|publisher= Osprey Publishing \|date=2013 \|page=22}}</ref> Only 15 were built and were removed as German airborne radar systems improved though 1942.<ref>{{cite book \|first= Alastair \|last=Goodrum \|title= No Place for Chivalry \|date=2005 \|publisher=Grub Street \|page=109}}</ref>

	AEG had been working with the same systems for use on [[tank]]s, and deployed a number of models through the war, with limited production of the [[FG 1250]] beginning in 1943.{{sfn\|Rogalski\|2000\|p=3}} This work culminated in the [[Zielgerät 1229]] ''Vampir'' riflescope which was used with the [[StG 44]] [[assault rifle]] for night use.<ref>{{cite book \|first=Chris \|last=McNab \|title= German Automatic Rifles 1941-45 \|publisher=Osprey \|date= 2013 \|pages=63–64 \|isbn=9781780963853 \|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qU2kAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA63}}</ref>		AEG had been working with the same systems for use on [[tank]]s, and deployed a number of models through the war, with limited production of the [[FG 1250]] beginning in 1943.{{sfn\|Rogalski\|2000\|p=3}} This work culminated in the [[Zielgerät 1229]] ''Vampir'' riflescope which was used with the [[StG 44]] [[assault rifle]] for night use.<ref>{{cite book \|first=Chris \|last=McNab \|title=German Automatic Rifles 1941-45 \|publisher=Osprey \|date=2013 \|pages=63–64 \|isbn=9781780963853 \|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qU2kAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA63 }}{{Dead link\|date=September 2024 \|bot=InternetArchiveBot \|fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>

	===German seekers===		===German seekers===

A09: Reverted 1 edit by Daskasa (talk): Rv spam

2024-08-27T08:53:25Z

Reverted 1 edit by Daskasa (talk): Rv spam

← Previous revision		Revision as of 08:53, 27 August 2024
Line 155:		Line 155:

	===Rosette seekers===		===Rosette seekers===
	The ''rosette seeker'', also known as a ''pseudoimager'', uses much of the mechanical layout of the con-scan system, but adds another mirror or prism to create a more complex pattern, drawing out a [[Rose (mathematics)\|rosette]].<ref name=jeff>{{cite book \|first=Jeffrey \|last=Strickland \|title=Missile Flight Simulation \|publisher=Lulu \|date= 2012 \|pages=21–22}}</ref> Compared to the fixed angle of the con-scan, the rosette pattern causes the image to scan to greater angles.~~<ref>{{cite web\|url=https://patents.google.com/patent/US4009393A/en \|title=US4009393A Dual spectral range target tracking seeker}}</ref>~~ Sensors on the drive shafts are fed to a mixer that produces a sample FM signal. Mixing this signal with the one from the seeker removes the motion, producing an output signal identical to that from the con-scan. A major advantage is that the rosette seeker scans out a wider portion of the sky, making it much more difficult for the target to move out of the field of view.{{sfn\|Deuerle\|2003\|p=2407}}		The ''rosette seeker'', also known as a ''pseudoimager'', uses much of the mechanical layout of the con-scan system, but adds another mirror or prism to create a more complex pattern, drawing out a [[Rose (mathematics)\|rosette]].<ref name=jeff>{{cite book \|first=Jeffrey \|last=Strickland \|title=Missile Flight Simulation \|publisher=Lulu \|date= 2012 \|pages=21–22}}</ref> Compared to the fixed angle of the con-scan, the rosette pattern causes the image to scan to greater angles. Sensors on the drive shafts are fed to a mixer that produces a sample FM signal. Mixing this signal with the one from the seeker removes the motion, producing an output signal identical to that from the con-scan. A major advantage is that the rosette seeker scans out a wider portion of the sky, making it much more difficult for the target to move out of the field of view.{{sfn\|Deuerle\|2003\|p=2407}}

	The downside to the rosette scan is that it produces a very complex output. Objects within the seeker's FOV produce completely separate signals as it scans around the sky; the system might see the target, flares, the sun and the ground at different times. In order to process this information and extract the target, the individual signals are sent into a [[computer memory]]. Over the period of the complete scan this produces a 2D image, which gives it the name pseudo imager.{{sfn\|Deuerle\|2003\|p=2407}} Although this makes the system more complex, the resulting image offers much more information. Flares can be recognized and rejected by their small size, clouds for their larger size, etc.<ref name=jeff/>		The downside to the rosette scan is that it produces a very complex output. Objects within the seeker's FOV produce completely separate signals as it scans around the sky; the system might see the target, flares, the sun and the ground at different times. In order to process this information and extract the target, the individual signals are sent into a [[computer memory]]. Over the period of the complete scan this produces a 2D image, which gives it the name pseudo imager.{{sfn\|Deuerle\|2003\|p=2407}} Although this makes the system more complex, the resulting image offers much more information. Flares can be recognized and rejected by their small size, clouds for their larger size, etc.<ref name=jeff/>

← Previous revision		Revision as of 14:18, 6 October 2024
Line 75:		Line 75:
	New seeker designs began to appear during the 1970s and led to a series of more advanced missiles. A major upgrade to the Sidewinder began, providing it with a seeker that was sensitive enough to track from any angle, giving the missile ''all aspect'' capability for the first time. This was combined with a new scanning pattern that helped reject confusing sources (like the sun reflecting off clouds) and improve the guidance towards the target. A small number of the resulting L models were rushed to the UK just prior to their engagement in the [[Falklands War]], where they achieved an 82% kill ratio, and the misses were generally due to the target aircraft flying out of range.{{sfn\|Hollway\|2013}} The Argentine aircraft, equipped with Sidewinder B and [[R.550 Magic]], could only fire from the rear aspect, which the British pilots simply avoided by always flying directly at them. The L was so effective that aircraft hurried to add flare countermeasures, which led to another minor upgrade to the M model to better reject flares. The L and M models would go on to be the backbone of Western air forces through the end of the [[Cold War]] era.		New seeker designs began to appear during the 1970s and led to a series of more advanced missiles. A major upgrade to the Sidewinder began, providing it with a seeker that was sensitive enough to track from any angle, giving the missile ''all aspect'' capability for the first time. This was combined with a new scanning pattern that helped reject confusing sources (like the sun reflecting off clouds) and improve the guidance towards the target. A small number of the resulting L models were rushed to the UK just prior to their engagement in the [[Falklands War]], where they achieved an 82% kill ratio, and the misses were generally due to the target aircraft flying out of range.{{sfn\|Hollway\|2013}} The Argentine aircraft, equipped with Sidewinder B and [[R.550 Magic]], could only fire from the rear aspect, which the British pilots simply avoided by always flying directly at them. The L was so effective that aircraft hurried to add flare countermeasures, which led to another minor upgrade to the M model to better reject flares. The L and M models would go on to be the backbone of Western air forces through the end of the [[Cold War]] era.

	An even larger step was taken by the Soviets with their [[R-73 (missile)\|R-73]], which replaced the K-13 and others with a dramatically improved design. This missile introduced the ability to be fired at targets completely out of view of the seeker; after firing the missile would orient itself in the direction indicated by the launcher and then attempt to lock on. When combined with a [[helmet mounted sight]], the missile could be cued and targeted without the launch aircraft first having to point itself at the target. This proved to offer significant advantages in combat, and caused great concern for Western forces.<ref>{{cite web \|website=FAS \|title=AA-11 ARCHER R-73 \|url=http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/row/aa-11.htm \|date=3 September 2000 \|access-date=9 October 2015 \|archive-date=2 September 2016 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160902160451/http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/row/aa-11.htm \|url-status=dead }}</ref>		An even larger step was taken by the Soviets with their [[R-73 (missile)\|R-73]], which replaced the K-13 and others with a dramatically improved design. This missile introduced the ability to be fired at targets completely out of view of the seeker; after firing the missile would orient itself in the direction indicated by the launcher and then attempt to lock on. When combined with a [[helmet mounted sight]], the missile could be cued and targeted without the launch aircraft first having to point itself at the target. This proved to offer significant advantages in combat, and caused great concern for Western forces.<ref name=":0">{{cite web \|website=FAS \|title=AA-11 ARCHER R-73 \|url=http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/row/aa-11.htm \|date=3 September 2000 \|access-date=9 October 2015 \|archive-date=2 September 2016 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160902160451/http://fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/missile/row/aa-11.htm \|url-status=dead }}</ref>

	The solution to the R-73 problem was initially going to be the [[ASRAAM]], a pan-European design that combined the performance of the R-73 with an imaging seeker. In a wide-ranging agreement, the US agreed to adopt ASRAAM for their new short-range missile, while the Europeans would adopt [[AMRAAM]] as their medium-range weapon. However, ASRAAM soon ran into intractable delays as each of the member countries decided a different performance metric was more important. The US eventually bowed out of the program, and instead adapted the new seekers developed for ASRAAM on yet another version of the Sidewinder, the AIM-9X. This so extends its lifetime that it will have been in service for almost a century when the current aircraft leave service. ASRAAM did, eventually, deliver a missile that has been adopted by a number of European forces and many of the same technologies have appeared in the Chinese PL-10 and Israeli [[Python (missile)\|Python-5]].		The solution to the R-73 problem was initially going to be the [[ASRAAM]], a pan-European design that combined the performance of the R-73 with an imaging seeker. In a wide-ranging agreement, the US agreed to adopt ASRAAM for their new short-range missile, while the Europeans would adopt [[AMRAAM]] as their medium-range weapon. However, ASRAAM soon ran into intractable delays as each of the member countries decided a different performance metric was more important. The US eventually bowed out of the program, and instead adapted the new seekers developed for ASRAAM on yet another version of the Sidewinder, the AIM-9X. This so extends its lifetime that it will have been in service for almost a century when the current aircraft leave service. ASRAAM did, eventually, deliver a missile that has been adopted by a number of European forces and many of the same technologies have appeared in the Chinese PL-10 and Israeli [[Python (missile)\|Python-5]].
Line 85:		Line 85:
	The Soviets started development of two almost identical weapons in 1964, Strela-1 and Strela-2. Development of these proceeded much more smoothly, as the [[9K32 Strela-2]] entered service in 1968 after fewer years of development than the Redeye.<ref>Jane's Land Based Air Defence 2005–2006.</ref> Originally a competing design, the [[9K31 Strela-1]] was instead greatly increased in size for vehicle applications and entered service at around the same time. The UK began development of its [[Blowpipe (missile)\|Blowpipe]] in 1975, but placed the seeker on the launcher instead of the missile itself. The seeker sensed both the target and the missile and sent corrections to the missile via a radio link. These early weapons proved ineffective, with the Blowpipe failing in almost every combat use,<ref>{{cite journal \|first1= Lester \|last1= Grau \|first2= Ali \|last2= Ahmad Jalali \|title= The Campaign For The Caves: The Battles for Zhawar in the Soviet-Afghan War \|journal= The Journal of Slavic Military Studies \|date= September 2001 \|url= http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|quote= 13 Blowpipe missiles fired for no hits \|doi= 10.1080/13518040108430488 \|volume= 14 \|issue= 3 \|pages= 69–92 \|s2cid= 144936749 \|url-status= dead \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20051113125550/http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|archive-date= 2005-11-13 \|url-access= subscription }}</ref> while the Redeye fared somewhat better. The Strela-2 did better and claimed a number of victories in the middle east and Vietnam.<ref name="Arms-Expo.ru">{{cite web\|url=http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110126065453/http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-date=2011-01-26 \|title="Стрела-2" (9К32, SA-7, Grail), переносный зенитный ракетный комплекс — ОРУЖИЕ РОССИИ, Информационное агентство \|publisher=Arms-expo.ru \|access-date=2013-08-24}}</ref>		The Soviets started development of two almost identical weapons in 1964, Strela-1 and Strela-2. Development of these proceeded much more smoothly, as the [[9K32 Strela-2]] entered service in 1968 after fewer years of development than the Redeye.<ref>Jane's Land Based Air Defence 2005–2006.</ref> Originally a competing design, the [[9K31 Strela-1]] was instead greatly increased in size for vehicle applications and entered service at around the same time. The UK began development of its [[Blowpipe (missile)\|Blowpipe]] in 1975, but placed the seeker on the launcher instead of the missile itself. The seeker sensed both the target and the missile and sent corrections to the missile via a radio link. These early weapons proved ineffective, with the Blowpipe failing in almost every combat use,<ref>{{cite journal \|first1= Lester \|last1= Grau \|first2= Ali \|last2= Ahmad Jalali \|title= The Campaign For The Caves: The Battles for Zhawar in the Soviet-Afghan War \|journal= The Journal of Slavic Military Studies \|date= September 2001 \|url= http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|quote= 13 Blowpipe missiles fired for no hits \|doi= 10.1080/13518040108430488 \|volume= 14 \|issue= 3 \|pages= 69–92 \|s2cid= 144936749 \|url-status= dead \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20051113125550/http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|archive-date= 2005-11-13 \|url-access= subscription }}</ref> while the Redeye fared somewhat better. The Strela-2 did better and claimed a number of victories in the middle east and Vietnam.<ref name="Arms-Expo.ru">{{cite web\|url=http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110126065453/http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-date=2011-01-26 \|title="Стрела-2" (9К32, SA-7, Grail), переносный зенитный ракетный комплекс — ОРУЖИЕ РОССИИ, Информационное агентство \|publisher=Arms-expo.ru \|access-date=2013-08-24}}</ref>

	A major upgrade program for the Redeye started in 1967, as the Redeye II. Testing did not begin until 1975 and the first deliveries of the now renamed [[FIM-92 Stinger]] began in 1978. An improved rosette seeker was added to the B model in 1983, and several additional upgrades followed. Sent to the [[Soviet–Afghan War]], they claimed a 79% success rate against Soviet helicopters,<ref>{{cite book \|first1= Ray \|last1=Bonds \|first2=David l\|last2=Miller \|title= Illustrated Directory of Special Forces \|date=13 February 2003 \|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FMgpdulJsGgC&pg=PA359 \|page=359\|publisher=Voyageur Press \|isbn=9780760314197 }}</ref> although this is debated.<ref>{{cite web \|first= Leonard \|last= Leshuk \|title= Stinger Missiles in Afghanistan \|date= 2008 \|url= http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|access-date= 2015-09-16 \|archive-date= 2017-12-26 \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20171226014714/http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|url-status= live }}</ref> The Soviets likewise improved their own versions, introducing the [[9K34 Strela-3]] in 1974, and the greatly improved dual-frequency [[9K38 Igla]] in 1983, and Igla-S in 2004.<ref~~>{{cite~~ ~~web \|url~~=~~http~~://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|title=9K338 9M342 Igla-S / SA-24 Grinch \|website=Globalsecurity \|access-date=2015-10-09 \|archive-date=2011-12-04 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111204154628/http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|url-status=live ~~}}<~~/~~ref~~>		A major upgrade program for the Redeye started in 1967, as the Redeye II. Testing did not begin until 1975 and the first deliveries of the now renamed [[FIM-92 Stinger]] began in 1978. An improved rosette seeker was added to the B model in 1983, and several additional upgrades followed. Sent to the [[Soviet–Afghan War]], they claimed a 79% success rate against Soviet helicopters,<ref>{{cite book \|first1= Ray \|last1=Bonds \|first2=David l\|last2=Miller \|title= Illustrated Directory of Special Forces \|date=13 February 2003 \|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FMgpdulJsGgC&pg=PA359 \|page=359\|publisher=Voyageur Press \|isbn=9780760314197 }}</ref> although this is debated.<ref>{{cite web \|first= Leonard \|last= Leshuk \|title= Stinger Missiles in Afghanistan \|date= 2008 \|url= http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|access-date= 2015-09-16 \|archive-date= 2017-12-26 \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20171226014714/http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|url-status= live }}</ref> The Soviets likewise improved their own versions, introducing the [[9K34 Strela-3]] in 1974, and the greatly improved dual-frequency [[9K38 Igla]] in 1983, and Igla-S in 2004.<ref name=":0" />

	== Seeker types ==		== Seeker types ==

← Previous revision		Revision as of 14:06, 6 October 2024
Line 83:		Line 83:
	Based on the same general principles as the original Sidewinder, in 1955 [[Convair]] began studies on a small man-portable missile ([[MANPADS]]) that would emerge as the [[FIM-43 Redeye]]. Entering testing in 1961, the preliminary design proved to have poor performance, and a number of major upgrades followed. It was not until 1968 that the Block III version was put into production.<ref name="Cagle-1974">{{cite tech report \|first=Mary \|last=Cagle \|title=History of the Redeye Weapon System \|publisher=Historical Division, Army Missile Command \|date=23 May 1974 \|url=https://fas.org/asmp/campaigns/MANPADS/2005/redeye.pdf \|access-date=11 September 2015 \|archive-date=29 March 2016 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160329151913/https://fas.org/asmp/campaigns/MANPADS/2005/redeye.pdf \|url-status=dead }}</ref>		Based on the same general principles as the original Sidewinder, in 1955 [[Convair]] began studies on a small man-portable missile ([[MANPADS]]) that would emerge as the [[FIM-43 Redeye]]. Entering testing in 1961, the preliminary design proved to have poor performance, and a number of major upgrades followed. It was not until 1968 that the Block III version was put into production.<ref name="Cagle-1974">{{cite tech report \|first=Mary \|last=Cagle \|title=History of the Redeye Weapon System \|publisher=Historical Division, Army Missile Command \|date=23 May 1974 \|url=https://fas.org/asmp/campaigns/MANPADS/2005/redeye.pdf \|access-date=11 September 2015 \|archive-date=29 March 2016 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160329151913/https://fas.org/asmp/campaigns/MANPADS/2005/redeye.pdf \|url-status=dead }}</ref>

	The Soviets started development of two almost identical weapons in 1964, Strela-1 and Strela-2. Development of these proceeded much more smoothly, as the [[9K32 Strela-2]] entered service in 1968 after fewer years of development than the Redeye.<ref>Jane's Land Based Air Defence 2005–2006.</ref> Originally a competing design, the [[9K31 Strela-1]] was instead greatly increased in size for vehicle applications and entered service at around the same time. The UK began development of its [[Blowpipe (missile)\|Blowpipe]] in 1975, but placed the seeker on the launcher instead of the missile itself. The seeker sensed both the target and the missile and sent corrections to the missile via a radio link. These early weapons proved ineffective, with the Blowpipe failing in almost every combat use,<ref>{{cite journal \|first1= Lester \|last1= Grau \|first2= Ali \|last2= Ahmad Jalali \|title= The Campaign For The Caves: The Battles for Zhawar in the Soviet-Afghan War \|journal= The Journal of Slavic Military Studies \|date= September 2001 \|url= http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|quote= 13 Blowpipe missiles fired for no hits \|doi= 10.1080/13518040108430488 \|volume= 14 \|issue= 3 \|pages= 69–92 \|s2cid= 144936749 \|url-status= dead \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20051113125550/http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|archive-date= 2005-11-13 }}</ref> while the Redeye fared somewhat better. The Strela-2 did better and claimed a number of victories in the middle east and Vietnam.<ref name="Arms-Expo.ru">{{cite web\|url=http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110126065453/http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-date=2011-01-26 \|title="Стрела-2" (9К32, SA-7, Grail), переносный зенитный ракетный комплекс — ОРУЖИЕ РОССИИ, Информационное агентство \|publisher=Arms-expo.ru \|access-date=2013-08-24}}</ref>		The Soviets started development of two almost identical weapons in 1964, Strela-1 and Strela-2. Development of these proceeded much more smoothly, as the [[9K32 Strela-2]] entered service in 1968 after fewer years of development than the Redeye.<ref>Jane's Land Based Air Defence 2005–2006.</ref> Originally a competing design, the [[9K31 Strela-1]] was instead greatly increased in size for vehicle applications and entered service at around the same time. The UK began development of its [[Blowpipe (missile)\|Blowpipe]] in 1975, but placed the seeker on the launcher instead of the missile itself. The seeker sensed both the target and the missile and sent corrections to the missile via a radio link. These early weapons proved ineffective, with the Blowpipe failing in almost every combat use,<ref>{{cite journal \|first1= Lester \|last1= Grau \|first2= Ali \|last2= Ahmad Jalali \|title= The Campaign For The Caves: The Battles for Zhawar in the Soviet-Afghan War \|journal= The Journal of Slavic Military Studies \|date= September 2001 \|url= http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|quote= 13 Blowpipe missiles fired for no hits \|doi= 10.1080/13518040108430488 \|volume= 14 \|issue= 3 \|pages= 69–92 \|s2cid= 144936749 \|url-status= dead \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20051113125550/http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|archive-date= 2005-11-13 \|url-access= subscription }}</ref> while the Redeye fared somewhat better. The Strela-2 did better and claimed a number of victories in the middle east and Vietnam.<ref name="Arms-Expo.ru">{{cite web\|url=http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110126065453/http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-date=2011-01-26 \|title="Стрела-2" (9К32, SA-7, Grail), переносный зенитный ракетный комплекс — ОРУЖИЕ РОССИИ, Информационное агентство \|publisher=Arms-expo.ru \|access-date=2013-08-24}}</ref>

	A major upgrade program for the Redeye started in 1967, as the Redeye II. Testing did not begin until 1975 and the first deliveries of the now renamed [[FIM-92 Stinger]] began in 1978. An improved rosette seeker was added to the B model in 1983, and several additional upgrades followed. Sent to the [[Soviet–Afghan War]], they claimed a 79% success rate against Soviet helicopters,<ref>{{cite book \|first1= Ray \|last1=Bonds \|first2=David l\|last2=Miller \|title= Illustrated Directory of Special Forces \|date=13 February 2003 \|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FMgpdulJsGgC&pg=PA359 \|page=359\|publisher=Voyageur Press \|isbn=9780760314197 }}</ref> although this is debated.<ref>{{cite web \|first= Leonard \|last= Leshuk \|title= Stinger Missiles in Afghanistan \|date= 2008 \|url= http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|access-date= 2015-09-16 \|archive-date= 2017-12-26 \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20171226014714/http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|url-status= live }}</ref> The Soviets likewise improved their own versions, introducing the [[9K34 Strela-3]] in 1974, and the greatly improved dual-frequency [[9K38 Igla]] in 1983, and Igla-S in 2004.<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|title=9K338 9M342 Igla-S / SA-24 Grinch \|website=Globalsecurity \|access-date=2015-10-09 \|archive-date=2011-12-04 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111204154628/http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|url-status=live }}</ref>		A major upgrade program for the Redeye started in 1967, as the Redeye II. Testing did not begin until 1975 and the first deliveries of the now renamed [[FIM-92 Stinger]] began in 1978. An improved rosette seeker was added to the B model in 1983, and several additional upgrades followed. Sent to the [[Soviet–Afghan War]], they claimed a 79% success rate against Soviet helicopters,<ref>{{cite book \|first1= Ray \|last1=Bonds \|first2=David l\|last2=Miller \|title= Illustrated Directory of Special Forces \|date=13 February 2003 \|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FMgpdulJsGgC&pg=PA359 \|page=359\|publisher=Voyageur Press \|isbn=9780760314197 }}</ref> although this is debated.<ref>{{cite web \|first= Leonard \|last= Leshuk \|title= Stinger Missiles in Afghanistan \|date= 2008 \|url= http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|access-date= 2015-09-16 \|archive-date= 2017-12-26 \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20171226014714/http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|url-status= live }}</ref> The Soviets likewise improved their own versions, introducing the [[9K34 Strela-3]] in 1974, and the greatly improved dual-frequency [[9K38 Igla]] in 1983, and Igla-S in 2004.<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|title=9K338 9M342 Igla-S / SA-24 Grinch \|website=Globalsecurity \|access-date=2015-10-09 \|archive-date=2011-12-04 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111204154628/http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|url-status=live }}</ref>

← Previous revision		Revision as of 12:03, 6 October 2024
Line 56:		Line 56:
	In the post-war era, as the German developments became better known, a variety of research projects began to develop seekers based on the PbS sensor. These were combined with techniques developed during the war to improve accuracy of otherwise inherently inaccurate radar systems, especially the [[conical scanning]] system. One such system developed by the [[US Army Air Force]] (USAAF), known as the "Sun Tracker", was being developed as a possible guidance system for an [[intercontinental ballistic missile]]. Testing this system led to the [[1948 Lake Mead Boeing B-29 crash]].<ref>{{cite journal \|first=Julian \|last=Smith \|title=Dive Bomber \|journal= Smithsonian Magazine \|date=October 2005 \|url=http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/dive-bomber-70888901}}</ref>		In the post-war era, as the German developments became better known, a variety of research projects began to develop seekers based on the PbS sensor. These were combined with techniques developed during the war to improve accuracy of otherwise inherently inaccurate radar systems, especially the [[conical scanning]] system. One such system developed by the [[US Army Air Force]] (USAAF), known as the "Sun Tracker", was being developed as a possible guidance system for an [[intercontinental ballistic missile]]. Testing this system led to the [[1948 Lake Mead Boeing B-29 crash]].<ref>{{cite journal \|first=Julian \|last=Smith \|title=Dive Bomber \|journal= Smithsonian Magazine \|date=October 2005 \|url=http://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/dive-bomber-70888901}}</ref>

	USAAF project MX-798 was awarded to [[Hughes Aircraft]] in 1946 for an infrared tracking missile. The design used a simple reticle seeker and an active system to control roll during flight. This was replaced the next year by MX-904, calling for a supersonic version. At this stage the concept was for a defensive weapon fired rearward out of a long tube at the back end of [[bomber aircraft]]. In April 1949 the [[AAM-A-1 Firebird\|Firebird]] missile project was cancelled and MX-904 was redirected to be a forward-firing fighter weapon.<ref>{{cite journal \|first= Sean \|last=O'Connor \|title= Arming America's Interceptors: The Hughes Falcon Missile Family \|date= June 2011 \|website=Airpower Australia \|pages=1 \|url=http://www.ausairpower.net/Falcon-Evolution.html}}</ref> The first test firings began in 1949, when it was given the designation AAM-A-2 (Air-to-air Missile, Air force, model 2) and the name Falcon. IR and [[semi-active radar homing]] (SARH) versions both entered service in 1956, and became known as the [[AIM-4 Falcon]] after 1962. The Falcon was a complex system offering limited performance, especially due to its lack of a proximity fuse, and managed only a 9% kill ratio in 54 firings during [[Operation Rolling Thunder]] in the [[Vietnam War]].<ref name=dirty>{{cite book \|first1=James \|last1=Dunnigan \|first2=Albert \|last2=Nofi \|title= Dirty Little Secrets of the Vietnam War \|publisher= Macmillan \|date= 2014 \|pages=118–120}}</ref> However, this relatively low success rate must be appreciated in the context of all these kills representing direct hits, something that was not true of every kill by other American AAMs.		USAAF project MX-798 was awarded to [[Hughes Aircraft]] in 1946 for an infrared tracking missile. The design used a simple reticle seeker and an active system to control roll during flight. This was replaced the next year by MX-904, calling for a supersonic version. At this stage the concept was for a defensive weapon fired rearward out of a long tube at the back end of [[bomber aircraft]]. In April 1949 the [[AAM-A-1 Firebird\|Firebird]] missile project was cancelled and MX-904 was redirected to be a forward-firing fighter weapon.<ref>{{cite journal \|first= Sean \|last= O'Connor \|title= Arming America's Interceptors: The Hughes Falcon Missile Family \|date= June 2011 \|website= Airpower Australia \|pages= 1 \|url= http://www.ausairpower.net/Falcon-Evolution.html \|access-date= 2015-09-14 \|archive-date= 2015-09-08 \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20150908124557/http://www.ausairpower.net/Falcon-Evolution.html \|url-status= live }}</ref> The first test firings began in 1949, when it was given the designation AAM-A-2 (Air-to-air Missile, Air force, model 2) and the name Falcon. IR and [[semi-active radar homing]] (SARH) versions both entered service in 1956, and became known as the [[AIM-4 Falcon]] after 1962. The Falcon was a complex system offering limited performance, especially due to its lack of a proximity fuse, and managed only a 9% kill ratio in 54 firings during [[Operation Rolling Thunder]] in the [[Vietnam War]].<ref name=dirty>{{cite book \|first1=James \|last1=Dunnigan \|first2=Albert \|last2=Nofi \|title= Dirty Little Secrets of the Vietnam War \|publisher= Macmillan \|date= 2014 \|pages=118–120}}</ref> However, this relatively low success rate must be appreciated in the context of all these kills representing direct hits, something that was not true of every kill by other American AAMs.

	In the same year as MX-798, 1946, [[William B. McLean]] began studies of a similar concept at the Naval Ordnance Test Station, today known as [[Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake]]. He spent three years simply considering various designs, which led to a considerably less complicated design than the Falcon. When his team had a design they believed would be workable, they began trying to fit it to the newly introduced [[Zuni (rocket)\|Zuni 5-inch rocket]]. They presented it in 1951 and it became an official project the next year. [[Wally Schirra]] recalls visiting the lab and watching the seeker follow his cigarette.{{sfn\|Hollway\|2013}} The missile was given the name [[AIM-9_Sidewinder\|Sidewinder]] after a local snake; the name had a second significance as the [[Crotalus cerastes\|sidewinder]] is a [[pit viper]] and hunts by heat, and moves in an undulating pattern not unlike the missile.<ref>{{cite journal \|first=Preston \|last=Lerner \|title=Sidewinder \|journal=Air and Space Magazine \|date=November 2010 \|url=http://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviation/sidewinder-57687913/?no-ist}}</ref> The Sidewinder entered service in 1957, and was widely used during the Vietnam war. It proved to be a better weapon than the Falcon: B models managed a 14% kill ratio, while the much longer-ranged D models managed 19%. Its performance and lower cost led the Air Force to adopt it as well.<ref name=dirty/><ref>{{cite encyclopedia \|first=Marcelle \|last=Size Knaak \|title=F-4E \|encyclopedia= Encyclopedia of US Air Force aircraft and missile systems \|publisher= US Air Force History Office, DIANE Publishing \|date=1978 \|page=278 }}</ref>		In the same year as MX-798, 1946, [[William B. McLean]] began studies of a similar concept at the Naval Ordnance Test Station, today known as [[Naval Air Weapons Station China Lake]]. He spent three years simply considering various designs, which led to a considerably less complicated design than the Falcon. When his team had a design they believed would be workable, they began trying to fit it to the newly introduced [[Zuni (rocket)\|Zuni 5-inch rocket]]. They presented it in 1951 and it became an official project the next year. [[Wally Schirra]] recalls visiting the lab and watching the seeker follow his cigarette.{{sfn\|Hollway\|2013}} The missile was given the name [[AIM-9_Sidewinder\|Sidewinder]] after a local snake; the name had a second significance as the [[Crotalus cerastes\|sidewinder]] is a [[pit viper]] and hunts by heat, and moves in an undulating pattern not unlike the missile.<ref>{{cite journal \|first=Preston \|last=Lerner \|title=Sidewinder \|journal=Air and Space Magazine \|date=November 2010 \|url=http://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviation/sidewinder-57687913/?no-ist \|access-date=2015-09-11 \|archive-date=2015-10-02 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151002230107/http://www.airspacemag.com/military-aviation/sidewinder-57687913/?no-ist \|url-status=live }}</ref> The Sidewinder entered service in 1957, and was widely used during the Vietnam war. It proved to be a better weapon than the Falcon: B models managed a 14% kill ratio, while the much longer-ranged D models managed 19%. Its performance and lower cost led the Air Force to adopt it as well.<ref name=dirty/><ref>{{cite encyclopedia \|first=Marcelle \|last=Size Knaak \|title=F-4E \|encyclopedia= Encyclopedia of US Air Force aircraft and missile systems \|publisher= US Air Force History Office, DIANE Publishing \|date=1978 \|page=278 }}</ref>

	The first heat-seeker built outside the US was the UK's [[de Havilland Firestreak]]. Development began as OR.1056 [[Red Hawk missile\|Red Hawk]], but this was considered too advanced, and in 1951 an amended concept was released as OR.1117 and given the code name [[Blue Jay (missile)\|Blue Jay]]. Designed as an anti-bomber weapon, the Blue Jay was larger, much heavier and flew faster than its US counterparts, but had about the same range. It had a more advanced seeker, using PbTe and cooled to −180 °C (−292.0 °F) by [[anhydrous ammonia]] to improve its performance. One distinguishing feature was its faceted nose cone, which was selected after it was found ice would build up on a more conventional hemispherical dome. The first test firing took place in 1955 and it entered service with the [[Royal Air Force]] in August 1958.<ref>{{Cite book \| last1 = Gibson\| first1 = Chris \| first2 = Tony\| last2 = Buttler \| title = British Secret Projects: Hypersonics, Ramjets and Missiles \| publisher = Midland \| date= 2007 \| pages = 33–35 }}</ref>		The first heat-seeker built outside the US was the UK's [[de Havilland Firestreak]]. Development began as OR.1056 [[Red Hawk missile\|Red Hawk]], but this was considered too advanced, and in 1951 an amended concept was released as OR.1117 and given the code name [[Blue Jay (missile)\|Blue Jay]]. Designed as an anti-bomber weapon, the Blue Jay was larger, much heavier and flew faster than its US counterparts, but had about the same range. It had a more advanced seeker, using PbTe and cooled to −180 °C (−292.0 °F) by [[anhydrous ammonia]] to improve its performance. One distinguishing feature was its faceted nose cone, which was selected after it was found ice would build up on a more conventional hemispherical dome. The first test firing took place in 1955 and it entered service with the [[Royal Air Force]] in August 1958.<ref>{{Cite book \| last1 = Gibson\| first1 = Chris \| first2 = Tony\| last2 = Buttler \| title = British Secret Projects: Hypersonics, Ramjets and Missiles \| publisher = Midland \| date= 2007 \| pages = 33–35 }}</ref>
Line 71:		Line 71:
	[[File:R-73.jpg\|thumb\|right\|The R-73 was a leap forward for Soviet designs, and cause for considerable worry among western air forces.]]		[[File:R-73.jpg\|thumb\|right\|The R-73 was a leap forward for Soviet designs, and cause for considerable worry among western air forces.]]

	As Vietnam revealed the terrible performance of existing missile designs, a number of efforts began to address them. In the US, minor upgrades to the Sidewinder were carried out as soon as possible, but more broadly pilots were taught proper engagement techniques so they would not fire as soon as they heard the missile tone, and would instead move to a position where the missile would be able to continue tracking even after launch. This problem also led to efforts to make new missiles that would hit their targets even if launched under these less-than-ideal positions. In the UK this led to the [[SRAAM]] project, which was ultimately the victim of continually changing requirements.<ref>{{cite journal \|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1981/1981%20-%201812.html \|title=ASRAAM - Europe's new dogfight missile \|journal=Flight International \|date= 6 June 1981 \|page=1742}}</ref> Two US programmes, [[AIM-82]] and [[AIM-95 Agile]], met similar fates.<ref>{{cite journal \|title=Naval Weapons Center AIM-95 Agile \|journal=Flight International \|date=8 May 1975 \|page=765}}</ref>		As Vietnam revealed the terrible performance of existing missile designs, a number of efforts began to address them. In the US, minor upgrades to the Sidewinder were carried out as soon as possible, but more broadly pilots were taught proper engagement techniques so they would not fire as soon as they heard the missile tone, and would instead move to a position where the missile would be able to continue tracking even after launch. This problem also led to efforts to make new missiles that would hit their targets even if launched under these less-than-ideal positions. In the UK this led to the [[SRAAM]] project, which was ultimately the victim of continually changing requirements.<ref>{{cite journal \|url=http://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1981/1981%20-%201812.html \|title=ASRAAM - Europe's new dogfight missile \|journal=Flight International \|date=6 June 1981 \|page=1742 \|access-date=9 October 2015 \|archive-date=7 January 2018 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180107232853/https://www.flightglobal.com/pdfarchive/view/1981/1981%20-%201812.html \|url-status=live }}</ref> Two US programmes, [[AIM-82]] and [[AIM-95 Agile]], met similar fates.<ref>{{cite journal \|title=Naval Weapons Center AIM-95 Agile \|journal=Flight International \|date=8 May 1975 \|page=765}}</ref>

	New seeker designs began to appear during the 1970s and led to a series of more advanced missiles. A major upgrade to the Sidewinder began, providing it with a seeker that was sensitive enough to track from any angle, giving the missile ''all aspect'' capability for the first time. This was combined with a new scanning pattern that helped reject confusing sources (like the sun reflecting off clouds) and improve the guidance towards the target. A small number of the resulting L models were rushed to the UK just prior to their engagement in the [[Falklands War]], where they achieved an 82% kill ratio, and the misses were generally due to the target aircraft flying out of range.{{sfn\|Hollway\|2013}} The Argentine aircraft, equipped with Sidewinder B and [[R.550 Magic]], could only fire from the rear aspect, which the British pilots simply avoided by always flying directly at them. The L was so effective that aircraft hurried to add flare countermeasures, which led to another minor upgrade to the M model to better reject flares. The L and M models would go on to be the backbone of Western air forces through the end of the [[Cold War]] era.		New seeker designs began to appear during the 1970s and led to a series of more advanced missiles. A major upgrade to the Sidewinder began, providing it with a seeker that was sensitive enough to track from any angle, giving the missile ''all aspect'' capability for the first time. This was combined with a new scanning pattern that helped reject confusing sources (like the sun reflecting off clouds) and improve the guidance towards the target. A small number of the resulting L models were rushed to the UK just prior to their engagement in the [[Falklands War]], where they achieved an 82% kill ratio, and the misses were generally due to the target aircraft flying out of range.{{sfn\|Hollway\|2013}} The Argentine aircraft, equipped with Sidewinder B and [[R.550 Magic]], could only fire from the rear aspect, which the British pilots simply avoided by always flying directly at them. The L was so effective that aircraft hurried to add flare countermeasures, which led to another minor upgrade to the M model to better reject flares. The L and M models would go on to be the backbone of Western air forces through the end of the [[Cold War]] era.
Line 85:		Line 85:
	The Soviets started development of two almost identical weapons in 1964, Strela-1 and Strela-2. Development of these proceeded much more smoothly, as the [[9K32 Strela-2]] entered service in 1968 after fewer years of development than the Redeye.<ref>Jane's Land Based Air Defence 2005–2006.</ref> Originally a competing design, the [[9K31 Strela-1]] was instead greatly increased in size for vehicle applications and entered service at around the same time. The UK began development of its [[Blowpipe (missile)\|Blowpipe]] in 1975, but placed the seeker on the launcher instead of the missile itself. The seeker sensed both the target and the missile and sent corrections to the missile via a radio link. These early weapons proved ineffective, with the Blowpipe failing in almost every combat use,<ref>{{cite journal \|first1= Lester \|last1= Grau \|first2= Ali \|last2= Ahmad Jalali \|title= The Campaign For The Caves: The Battles for Zhawar in the Soviet-Afghan War \|journal= The Journal of Slavic Military Studies \|date= September 2001 \|url= http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|quote= 13 Blowpipe missiles fired for no hits \|doi= 10.1080/13518040108430488 \|volume= 14 \|issue= 3 \|pages= 69–92 \|s2cid= 144936749 \|url-status= dead \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20051113125550/http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|archive-date= 2005-11-13 }}</ref> while the Redeye fared somewhat better. The Strela-2 did better and claimed a number of victories in the middle east and Vietnam.<ref name="Arms-Expo.ru">{{cite web\|url=http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110126065453/http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-date=2011-01-26 \|title="Стрела-2" (9К32, SA-7, Grail), переносный зенитный ракетный комплекс — ОРУЖИЕ РОССИИ, Информационное агентство \|publisher=Arms-expo.ru \|access-date=2013-08-24}}</ref>		The Soviets started development of two almost identical weapons in 1964, Strela-1 and Strela-2. Development of these proceeded much more smoothly, as the [[9K32 Strela-2]] entered service in 1968 after fewer years of development than the Redeye.<ref>Jane's Land Based Air Defence 2005–2006.</ref> Originally a competing design, the [[9K31 Strela-1]] was instead greatly increased in size for vehicle applications and entered service at around the same time. The UK began development of its [[Blowpipe (missile)\|Blowpipe]] in 1975, but placed the seeker on the launcher instead of the missile itself. The seeker sensed both the target and the missile and sent corrections to the missile via a radio link. These early weapons proved ineffective, with the Blowpipe failing in almost every combat use,<ref>{{cite journal \|first1= Lester \|last1= Grau \|first2= Ali \|last2= Ahmad Jalali \|title= The Campaign For The Caves: The Battles for Zhawar in the Soviet-Afghan War \|journal= The Journal of Slavic Military Studies \|date= September 2001 \|url= http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|quote= 13 Blowpipe missiles fired for no hits \|doi= 10.1080/13518040108430488 \|volume= 14 \|issue= 3 \|pages= 69–92 \|s2cid= 144936749 \|url-status= dead \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20051113125550/http://fmso.leavenworth.army.mil/documents/zhawar/zhawar.htm \|archive-date= 2005-11-13 }}</ref> while the Redeye fared somewhat better. The Strela-2 did better and claimed a number of victories in the middle east and Vietnam.<ref name="Arms-Expo.ru">{{cite web\|url=http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110126065453/http://www.arms-expo.ru/site.xp/049051049050124052050050.html\|archive-date=2011-01-26 \|title="Стрела-2" (9К32, SA-7, Grail), переносный зенитный ракетный комплекс — ОРУЖИЕ РОССИИ, Информационное агентство \|publisher=Arms-expo.ru \|access-date=2013-08-24}}</ref>

	A major upgrade program for the Redeye started in 1967, as the Redeye II. Testing did not begin until 1975 and the first deliveries of the now renamed [[FIM-92 Stinger]] began in 1978. An improved rosette seeker was added to the B model in 1983, and several additional upgrades followed. Sent to the [[Soviet–Afghan War]], they claimed a 79% success rate against Soviet helicopters,<ref>{{cite book \|first1= Ray \|last1=Bonds \|first2=David l\|last2=Miller \|title= Illustrated Directory of Special Forces \|date=13 February 2003 \|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FMgpdulJsGgC&pg=PA359 \|page=359\|publisher=Voyageur Press \|isbn=9780760314197 }}</ref> although this is debated.<ref>{{cite web \|first= Leonard \|last= Leshuk \|title=Stinger Missiles in Afghanistan \|date=2008 \|url=http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html}}</ref> The Soviets likewise improved their own versions, introducing the [[9K34 Strela-3]] in 1974, and the greatly improved dual-frequency [[9K38 Igla]] in 1983, and Igla-S in 2004.<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|title=9K338 9M342 Igla-S / SA-24 Grinch \|website=Globalsecurity }}</ref>		A major upgrade program for the Redeye started in 1967, as the Redeye II. Testing did not begin until 1975 and the first deliveries of the now renamed [[FIM-92 Stinger]] began in 1978. An improved rosette seeker was added to the B model in 1983, and several additional upgrades followed. Sent to the [[Soviet–Afghan War]], they claimed a 79% success rate against Soviet helicopters,<ref>{{cite book \|first1= Ray \|last1=Bonds \|first2=David l\|last2=Miller \|title= Illustrated Directory of Special Forces \|date=13 February 2003 \|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FMgpdulJsGgC&pg=PA359 \|page=359\|publisher=Voyageur Press \|isbn=9780760314197 }}</ref> although this is debated.<ref>{{cite web \|first= Leonard \|last= Leshuk \|title= Stinger Missiles in Afghanistan \|date= 2008 \|url= http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|access-date= 2015-09-16 \|archive-date= 2017-12-26 \|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20171226014714/http://europauniversitypress.co.uk/auth_article416.html \|url-status= live }}</ref> The Soviets likewise improved their own versions, introducing the [[9K34 Strela-3]] in 1974, and the greatly improved dual-frequency [[9K38 Igla]] in 1983, and Igla-S in 2004.<ref>{{cite web \|url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|title=9K338 9M342 Igla-S / SA-24 Grinch \|website=Globalsecurity \|access-date=2015-10-09 \|archive-date=2011-12-04 \|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111204154628/http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/russia/9k338.htm \|url-status=live }}</ref>

	== Seeker types ==		== Seeker types ==