Talk:Cell growth - Revision history

Cewbot: Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Molecular Biology}}.

2024-01-30T03:45:49Z

Maintain {{WPBS}} and vital articles: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "B" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Molecular Biology}}.

← Previous revision		Revision as of 03:45, 30 January 2024
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WikiProject ~~Molecular~~ ~~Biology~~\|class=B\|~~MCB=yes \|MCB-importance=top }}~~		{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=B\|
			{{WikiProject Molecular Biology\|MCB=yes \|MCB-importance=top }}

			}}
	==Untitled==		==Untitled==
	This article seems to be about cell reproduction, not cell growth. - [[User:Nunh-huh\|Nunh-huh]] 06:42, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)		This article seems to be about cell reproduction, not cell growth. - [[User:Nunh-huh\|Nunh-huh]] 06:42, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)

PrimeBOT: /* top */Task 24: combining WikiProject banners following a TFD

2022-07-16T16:42:27Z

top: Task 24: combining WikiProject banners following a TFD

← Previous revision		Revision as of 16:42, 16 July 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WikiProject Molecular ~~and Cellular~~ Biology \|importance=top ~~\|class=B~~}}		{{WikiProject Molecular Biology\|class=B\|MCB=yes \|MCB-importance=top }}

	==Untitled==		==Untitled==

InternetArchiveBot: Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.5beta)

2017-08-01T19:13:22Z

Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.5beta)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 19:13, 1 August 2017
Line 30:		Line 30:
	{{Substituted comment\|length=169\|lastedit=20070218215102\|comment=Changed rating to "top" as this is high school/SAT biology content and generally important cell biology topic. - [[User:Tameeria\|tameeria]] 21:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)}}		{{Substituted comment\|length=169\|lastedit=20070218215102\|comment=Changed rating to "top" as this is high school/SAT biology content and generally important cell biology topic. - [[User:Tameeria\|tameeria]] 21:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)}}
	Substituted at 11:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)		Substituted at 11:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

			== External links modified ==

			Hello fellow Wikipedians,

			I have just modified 2 external links on [[Cell growth]]. Please take a moment to review [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=prev&oldid=793438591 my edit]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot\|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040328112742/http://wikibooks.org/wiki/Biology_Cell_biology_Introduction_Cell_size to http://wikibooks.org/wiki/Biology_Cell_biology_Introduction_Cell_size
			*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040427144107/http://www.bms.ed.ac.uk/research/others/smaciver/chaos.htm to http://www.bms.ed.ac.uk/research/others/smaciver/chaos.htm

			When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

			{{sourcecheck\|checked=false\|needhelp=}}

			Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot\|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot\|Report bug]])</span> 19:13, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Evolution and evolvability: Assessment: -Cell Signaling (assisted)

2017-06-08T09:07:45Z

Assessment: -Cell Signaling (assisted)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 09:07, 8 June 2017
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WikiProject ~~Cell~~ ~~Signaling~~\|~~class~~=\|~~importance~~=}}		{{WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology \|importance=top \|class=B}}
	{{WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology\|importance=top\|class=B}}

	==Untitled==		==Untitled==

JJMC89 bot: subst /Comments to discontinue comments subpage) (AWB [12009]

2016-04-29T11:07:40Z

subst /Comments to discontinue comments subpage) (AWB [12009]

← Previous revision		Revision as of 11:07, 29 April 2016
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WikiProject Cell Signaling\|class=\|importance=}}		{{WikiProject Cell Signaling\|class=\|importance=}}
	{{~~Wikiproject~~ ~~MCB~~\|importance=top\|class=B}}		{{WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology\|importance=top\|class=B}}

	==Untitled==		==Untitled==
Line 27:		Line 27:

	Cells may also grow, this is the case in plant development, cells divide in the meristems and then expand (grow) through development of a number of organelles (like the vaculoe). Cells may also increase volume by endomitosis, making the nuclei large. I'm happy to elaborate in the article, but I'm not sure where it would go- perhaps a section called increasing cell volume--[[User:Petaholmes\|nixie]] 05:49, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)		Cells may also grow, this is the case in plant development, cells divide in the meristems and then expand (grow) through development of a number of organelles (like the vaculoe). Cells may also increase volume by endomitosis, making the nuclei large. I'm happy to elaborate in the article, but I'm not sure where it would go- perhaps a section called increasing cell volume--[[User:Petaholmes\|nixie]] 05:49, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

			==Assessment comment==
			{{Substituted comment\|length=169\|lastedit=20070218215102\|comment=Changed rating to "top" as this is high school/SAT biology content and generally important cell biology topic. - [[User:Tameeria\|tameeria]] 21:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)}}
			Substituted at 11:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Magioladitis: clean up using AWB (9724)

2013-11-23T14:07:49Z

clean up using AWB (9724)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 14:07, 23 November 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~Template:~~Cell Signaling ~~Project~~\|class=\|importance=}}		{{WikiProject Cell Signaling\|class=\|importance=}}
	{{Wikiproject MCB\|importance=top\|class=B}}		{{Wikiproject MCB\|importance=top\|class=B}}

			==Untitled==
	This article seems to be about cell reproduction, not cell growth. - [[User:Nunh-huh\|Nunh-huh]] 06:42, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)		This article seems to be about cell reproduction, not cell growth. - [[User:Nunh-huh\|Nunh-huh]] 06:42, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Nurg: rm gen enquiry from Talk

2012-08-11T07:11:05Z

rm gen enquiry from Talk

← Previous revision		Revision as of 07:11, 11 August 2012
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Cells may also grow, this is the case in plant development, cells divide in the meristems and then expand (grow) through development of a number of organelles (like the vaculoe). Cells may also increase volume by endomitosis, making the nuclei large. I'm happy to elaborate in the article, but I'm not sure where it would go- perhaps a section called increasing cell volume--[[User:Petaholmes\|nixie]] 05:49, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)		Cells may also grow, this is the case in plant development, cells divide in the meristems and then expand (grow) through development of a number of organelles (like the vaculoe). Cells may also increase volume by endomitosis, making the nuclei large. I'm happy to elaborate in the article, but I'm not sure where it would go- perhaps a section called increasing cell volume--[[User:Petaholmes\|nixie]] 05:49, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

	== difference between cell division and cell growth ==

	What are the differences between cell division and cell growth? Are they the same?or they are actually different?

Nurg: Undid revision 243544973 by 190.80.62.170 (talk)

2012-08-11T05:35:45Z

Undid revision 243544973 by 190.80.62.170 (talk)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 05:35, 11 August 2012
Line 3:		Line 3:
	This article seems to be about cell reproduction, not cell growth. - [[User:Nunh-huh\|Nunh-huh]] 06:42, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)		This article seems to be about cell reproduction, not cell growth. - [[User:Nunh-huh\|Nunh-huh]] 06:42, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)

			: I agree. It is a long standing tradition (particularly in some fields of biology such as Develomental biology) for people to use the phrase "cell growth" when, in fact, it might be better to say "cell reproduction". In practical terms, the phrase "cell growth" seems to be a good shorthand to the idea of "growth in cell numbers by means of cell reproduction".
	".

			: Within biology, the term "cell reproduction" is almost never used by working biologists. (data: in the [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?db=PubMed Entrez] search engine has ZERO occurrences of "cell reproduction" and over 36,000 occurrences of "cell growth".) I think biologists want to use the word "reproduction" in the context of the reproduction of multicellular organisms, not cells. In biology textbooks (see: the searchable [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?db=Books Entrez Bookshelf]), the term "cell reproduction" is used as I have used it in the "cell growth" article, as a way to clearly (pendantically) refer to processes that working biologists prefer to refer to using the jargonistic phrase "cell growth".

	: I am not sure how Wikipedia deals with these situations. Does information go under the most commonly used name or under the most technically correct name? With good re-direction it probably does not matter. I was reluctant to create an article called "cell reproduction" because working biologists do not use that phrase. Since biology students and the interested public might search Wikipedia for "cell reproduction" we should either create an article for it or re-direct it to "cell growth". [[User:JWSchmidt\|JWSchmidt]] 14:59, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)		: I am not sure how Wikipedia deals with these situations. Does information go under the most commonly used name or under the most technically correct name? With good re-direction it probably does not matter. I was reluctant to create an article called "cell reproduction" because working biologists do not use that phrase. Since biology students and the interested public might search Wikipedia for "cell reproduction" we should either create an article for it or re-direct it to "cell growth". [[User:JWSchmidt\|JWSchmidt]] 14:59, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Lupo: Reverted edits by 71.165.206.42 (talk) to last version by Shubinator

2010-02-22T21:01:15Z

Reverted edits by 71.165.206.42 (talk) to last version by Shubinator

← Previous revision		Revision as of 21:01, 22 February 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	".		".

	: I am not sure how Wikipedia deals with these situations. Does information go under the most commonly used name or under the most technically correct name? With good re-direction it probably does not matter. I was reluctant to create an article called "cell reproduction" because working ~~and you fuck people hard and long~~ biologists do not use that phrase. Since biology students and the interested public might search Wikipedia for "cell reproduction" we should either create an article for it or re-direct it to "cell growth". [[User:JWSchmidt\|JWSchmidt]] 14:59, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)		: I am not sure how Wikipedia deals with these situations. Does information go under the most commonly used name or under the most technically correct name? With good re-direction it probably does not matter. I was reluctant to create an article called "cell reproduction" because working biologists do not use that phrase. Since biology students and the interested public might search Wikipedia for "cell reproduction" we should either create an article for it or re-direct it to "cell growth". [[User:JWSchmidt\|JWSchmidt]] 14:59, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)

	::My understanding is that we go with "most common term", not most correct. So probably a redirect from [[cell reproduction]] would suffice. Still, it seems a shame that we have so little information on actual cell growth (the greater part of the so-called "growth cycle") yet apparently the part least studied or least known. The titling thing wouldn't be disconcerting if there were less concentration on the "M phase" and at least a little information on G1, S, and G2 phases of the cycle. - [[User:Nunh-huh\|Nunh-huh]] 17:21, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)		::My understanding is that we go with "most common term", not most correct. So probably a redirect from [[cell reproduction]] would suffice. Still, it seems a shame that we have so little information on actual cell growth (the greater part of the so-called "growth cycle") yet apparently the part least studied or least known. The titling thing wouldn't be disconcerting if there were less concentration on the "M phase" and at least a little information on G1, S, and G2 phases of the cycle. - [[User:Nunh-huh\|Nunh-huh]] 17:21, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)

71.165.206.42 at 20:15, 2 February 2010

2010-02-02T20:15:44Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 20:15, 2 February 2010
Line 5:		Line 5:
	".		".

	: I am not sure how Wikipedia deals with these situations. Does information go under the most commonly used name or under the most technically correct name? With good re-direction it probably does not matter. I was reluctant to create an article called "cell reproduction" because working biologists do not use that phrase. Since biology students and the interested public might search Wikipedia for "cell reproduction" we should either create an article for it or re-direct it to "cell growth". [[User:JWSchmidt\|JWSchmidt]] 14:59, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)		: I am not sure how Wikipedia deals with these situations. Does information go under the most commonly used name or under the most technically correct name? With good re-direction it probably does not matter. I was reluctant to create an article called "cell reproduction" because working and you fuck people hard and long biologists do not use that phrase. Since biology students and the interested public might search Wikipedia for "cell reproduction" we should either create an article for it or re-direct it to "cell growth". [[User:JWSchmidt\|JWSchmidt]] 14:59, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)

	::My understanding is that we go with "most common term", not most correct. So probably a redirect from [[cell reproduction]] would suffice. Still, it seems a shame that we have so little information on actual cell growth (the greater part of the so-called "growth cycle") yet apparently the part least studied or least known. The titling thing wouldn't be disconcerting if there were less concentration on the "M phase" and at least a little information on G1, S, and G2 phases of the cycle. - [[User:Nunh-huh\|Nunh-huh]] 17:21, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)		::My understanding is that we go with "most common term", not most correct. So probably a redirect from [[cell reproduction]] would suffice. Still, it seems a shame that we have so little information on actual cell growth (the greater part of the so-called "growth cycle") yet apparently the part least studied or least known. The titling thing wouldn't be disconcerting if there were less concentration on the "M phase" and at least a little information on G1, S, and G2 phases of the cycle. - [[User:Nunh-huh\|Nunh-huh]] 17:21, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 14:07, 23 November 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{~~Template:~~Cell Signaling ~~Project~~\|class=\|importance=}}		{{WikiProject Cell Signaling\|class=\|importance=}}
	{{Wikiproject MCB\|importance=top\|class=B}}		{{Wikiproject MCB\|importance=top\|class=B}}

			==Untitled==
	This article seems to be about cell reproduction, not cell growth. - [[User:Nunh-huh\|Nunh-huh]] 06:42, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)		This article seems to be about cell reproduction, not cell growth. - [[User:Nunh-huh\|Nunh-huh]] 06:42, 31 Mar 2004 (UTC)