Talk:Taco - Revision history

Rosguill: /* History section */ Reply

2024-08-12T15:18:43Z

History section: Reply

← Previous revision		Revision as of 15:18, 12 August 2024
Line 46:		Line 46:
	:::I did it on their talk page instead. Here's the link, so you can follow up here on that discussion there if you wish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rosguill#Disagree_with_your_deletion [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 14:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		:::I did it on their talk page instead. Here's the link, so you can follow up here on that discussion there if you wish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rosguill#Disagree_with_your_deletion [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 14:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
	::::Their response sounds reasonable to me. Honestly tacos aren't in my editing scope; I'm just pointing out an ongoing need. That one fact is just a drop in the pond; I'm asking for at least a 4x expansion of the section. The onus is on you if you want that info in the article. No need to passive aggressively poke using my post. If you want it in prove your case [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		::::Their response sounds reasonable to me. Honestly tacos aren't in my editing scope; I'm just pointing out an ongoing need. That one fact is just a drop in the pond; I'm asking for at least a 4x expansion of the section. The onus is on you if you want that info in the article. No need to passive aggressively poke using my post. If you want it in prove your case [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
			::n.b., the History section is separate from the non-traditional variations section. The article should perhaps be reorganized to primarily focus on the history of the traditional taco and less on excerpts from articles on variations, but the first step there would be identify sources for more content on history and use them to expand the article. <sub>signed, </sub>[[User:Rosguill\|'''''Rosguill''''']] <sup>[[User talk:Rosguill\|''talk'']]</sup> 15:18, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Seefooddiet: /* History section */Detail

2024-08-12T15:01:12Z

History section: Detail

← Previous revision		Revision as of 15:01, 12 August 2024
Line 45:		Line 45:
	::In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite discussion. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		::In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite discussion. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
	:::I did it on their talk page instead. Here's the link, so you can follow up here on that discussion there if you wish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rosguill#Disagree_with_your_deletion [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 14:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		:::I did it on their talk page instead. Here's the link, so you can follow up here on that discussion there if you wish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rosguill#Disagree_with_your_deletion [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 14:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
	::::Their response sounds reasonable to me. Honestly tacos aren't in my editing scope; I'm just pointing out an ongoing need. The onus is on you if you want that info in the article. No need to passive aggressively poke using my post. If you want it in prove your case [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		::::Their response sounds reasonable to me. Honestly tacos aren't in my editing scope; I'm just pointing out an ongoing need. That one fact is just a drop in the pond; I'm asking for at least a 4x expansion of the section. The onus is on you if you want that info in the article. No need to passive aggressively poke using my post. If you want it in prove your case [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Seefooddiet: /* History section */ Reply

2024-08-12T14:56:20Z

History section: Reply

← Previous revision		Revision as of 14:56, 12 August 2024
Line 45:		Line 45:
	::In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite discussion. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		::In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite discussion. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
	:::I did it on their talk page instead. Here's the link, so you can follow up here on that discussion there if you wish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rosguill#Disagree_with_your_deletion [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 14:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		:::I did it on their talk page instead. Here's the link, so you can follow up here on that discussion there if you wish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rosguill#Disagree_with_your_deletion [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 14:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
			::::Their response sounds reasonable to me. Honestly tacos aren't in my editing scope; I'm just pointing out an ongoing need. The onus is on you if you want that info in the article. No need to passive aggressively poke using my post. If you want it in prove your case [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedian-in-Waiting: /* History section */ Reply

2024-08-12T14:48:15Z

History section: Reply

← Previous revision		Revision as of 14:48, 12 August 2024
Line 44:		Line 44:
	:I tried to add a small fact to the section and it was immediately reversed by a gatekeeper who said they didn't even read my cited scholarly journal article, and then they went and "corrected" other food-related topics and backed up their assertions by citing a pop-culture website. Probably not worth the effort. [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 12:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		:I tried to add a small fact to the section and it was immediately reversed by a gatekeeper who said they didn't even read my cited scholarly journal article, and then they went and "corrected" other food-related topics and backed up their assertions by citing a pop-culture website. Probably not worth the effort. [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 12:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
	::In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite discussion. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		::In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite discussion. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
			:::I did it on their talk page instead. Here's the link, so you can follow up here on that discussion there if you wish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rosguill#Disagree_with_your_deletion [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 14:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Seefooddiet: /* History section */Typo

2024-08-12T14:31:01Z

History section: Typo

← Previous revision		Revision as of 14:31, 12 August 2024
Line 43:		Line 43:

	:I tried to add a small fact to the section and it was immediately reversed by a gatekeeper who said they didn't even read my cited scholarly journal article, and then they went and "corrected" other food-related topics and backed up their assertions by citing a pop-culture website. Probably not worth the effort. [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 12:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		:I tried to add a small fact to the section and it was immediately reversed by a gatekeeper who said they didn't even read my cited scholarly journal article, and then they went and "corrected" other food-related topics and backed up their assertions by citing a pop-culture website. Probably not worth the effort. [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 12:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
	::In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite ~~discussions~~. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		::In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite discussion. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Seefooddiet: /* History section */ Reply

2024-08-12T14:30:23Z

History section: Reply

← Previous revision		Revision as of 14:30, 12 August 2024
Line 43:		Line 43:

	:I tried to add a small fact to the section and it was immediately reversed by a gatekeeper who said they didn't even read my cited scholarly journal article, and then they went and "corrected" other food-related topics and backed up their assertions by citing a pop-culture website. Probably not worth the effort. [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 12:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		:I tried to add a small fact to the section and it was immediately reversed by a gatekeeper who said they didn't even read my cited scholarly journal article, and then they went and "corrected" other food-related topics and backed up their assertions by citing a pop-culture website. Probably not worth the effort. [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 12:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
			::In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite discussions. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedian-in-Waiting: /* History section */ Reply

2024-08-12T12:54:11Z

History section: Reply

← Previous revision		Revision as of 12:54, 12 August 2024
Line 41:		Line 41:

	The history section is pretty lacking imo. Could use expansion and more rigor, especially given how important the food is culturally. Maybe just me, but food history is often lacking on Wikipedia [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 06:53, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		The history section is pretty lacking imo. Could use expansion and more rigor, especially given how important the food is culturally. Maybe just me, but food history is often lacking on Wikipedia [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 06:53, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

			:I tried to add a small fact to the section and it was immediately reversed by a gatekeeper who said they didn't even read my cited scholarly journal article, and then they went and "corrected" other food-related topics and backed up their assertions by citing a pop-culture website. Probably not worth the effort. [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 12:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Seefooddiet: /* History section */ new section

2024-08-12T06:53:02Z

History section: new section

← Previous revision		Revision as of 06:53, 12 August 2024
Line 37:		Line 37:
	::::Forget it: I found another ruling in a different state that explicitly states the opposite. Oh well: Court decisions in the US seem to be rather arbitrary. Sorry for bothering you people. [[Special:Contributions/2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F]] ([[User talk:2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|talk]]) 23:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)		::::Forget it: I found another ruling in a different state that explicitly states the opposite. Oh well: Court decisions in the US seem to be rather arbitrary. Sorry for bothering you people. [[Special:Contributions/2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F]] ([[User talk:2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|talk]]) 23:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
	:::::Really arbitrary, for sure. This was a single low-level court ruling to finesse an exception for a local zoning law. It's adorable and cute, which is why it's getting press, but has no real "official" legal bearing anywhere but Indiana, which is not exactly a Tex-Mex hub. This would be like a local Judge in Barcelona declaring that German Beer is really just bread-flavored sparkling water. ''[[User:Kuru\|Sam '''Kuru''']] [[User_talk:Kuru\|(talk)]]'' 23:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)		:::::Really arbitrary, for sure. This was a single low-level court ruling to finesse an exception for a local zoning law. It's adorable and cute, which is why it's getting press, but has no real "official" legal bearing anywhere but Indiana, which is not exactly a Tex-Mex hub. This would be like a local Judge in Barcelona declaring that German Beer is really just bread-flavored sparkling water. ''[[User:Kuru\|Sam '''Kuru''']] [[User_talk:Kuru\|(talk)]]'' 23:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

			== History section ==

			The history section is pretty lacking imo. Could use expansion and more rigor, especially given how important the food is culturally. Maybe just me, but food history is often lacking on Wikipedia [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 06:53, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

Kuru: /* Taco is officially classified as sandwich in the US */ reply

2024-05-20T23:21:29Z

Taco is officially classified as sandwich in the US: reply

← Previous revision		Revision as of 23:21, 20 May 2024
Line 36:		Line 36:
	:::I am geofenced and cannot get to the real ruling. [[Special:Contributions/2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F]] ([[User talk:2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|talk]]) 23:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)		:::I am geofenced and cannot get to the real ruling. [[Special:Contributions/2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F]] ([[User talk:2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|talk]]) 23:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
	::::Forget it: I found another ruling in a different state that explicitly states the opposite. Oh well: Court decisions in the US seem to be rather arbitrary. Sorry for bothering you people. [[Special:Contributions/2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F]] ([[User talk:2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|talk]]) 23:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)		::::Forget it: I found another ruling in a different state that explicitly states the opposite. Oh well: Court decisions in the US seem to be rather arbitrary. Sorry for bothering you people. [[Special:Contributions/2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F]] ([[User talk:2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|talk]]) 23:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
			:::::Really arbitrary, for sure. This was a single low-level court ruling to finesse an exception for a local zoning law. It's adorable and cute, which is why it's getting press, but has no real "official" legal bearing anywhere but Indiana, which is not exactly a Tex-Mex hub. This would be like a local Judge in Barcelona declaring that German Beer is really just bread-flavored sparkling water. ''[[User:Kuru\|Sam '''Kuru''']] [[User_talk:Kuru\|(talk)]]'' 23:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F: /* Taco is officially classified as sandwich in the US */ Reply

2024-05-20T23:10:24Z

Taco is officially classified as sandwich in the US: Reply

← Previous revision		Revision as of 23:10, 20 May 2024
Line 35:		Line 35:
	:::If you need a source, start with this one: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/18/dining/taco-sandwich-indiana-mexico.html		:::If you need a source, start with this one: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/18/dining/taco-sandwich-indiana-mexico.html
	:::I am geofenced and cannot get to the real ruling. [[Special:Contributions/2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F]] ([[User talk:2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|talk]]) 23:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)		:::I am geofenced and cannot get to the real ruling. [[Special:Contributions/2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F]] ([[User talk:2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|talk]]) 23:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
			::::Forget it: I found another ruling in a different state that explicitly states the opposite. Oh well: Court decisions in the US seem to be rather arbitrary. Sorry for bothering you people. [[Special:Contributions/2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F]] ([[User talk:2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|talk]]) 23:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 15:18, 12 August 2024
Line 46:		Line 46:
	:::I did it on their talk page instead. Here's the link, so you can follow up here on that discussion there if you wish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rosguill#Disagree_with_your_deletion [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 14:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		:::I did it on their talk page instead. Here's the link, so you can follow up here on that discussion there if you wish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rosguill#Disagree_with_your_deletion [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 14:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
	::::Their response sounds reasonable to me. Honestly tacos aren't in my editing scope; I'm just pointing out an ongoing need. That one fact is just a drop in the pond; I'm asking for at least a 4x expansion of the section. The onus is on you if you want that info in the article. No need to passive aggressively poke using my post. If you want it in prove your case [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		::::Their response sounds reasonable to me. Honestly tacos aren't in my editing scope; I'm just pointing out an ongoing need. That one fact is just a drop in the pond; I'm asking for at least a 4x expansion of the section. The onus is on you if you want that info in the article. No need to passive aggressively poke using my post. If you want it in prove your case [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
			::n.b., the History section is separate from the non-traditional variations section. The article should perhaps be reorganized to primarily focus on the history of the traditional taco and less on excerpts from articles on variations, but the first step there would be identify sources for more content on history and use them to expand the article. <sub>signed, </sub>[[User:Rosguill\|'''''Rosguill''''']] <sup>[[User talk:Rosguill\|''talk'']]</sup> 15:18, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 15:01, 12 August 2024
Line 45:		Line 45:
	::In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite discussion. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		::In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite discussion. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
	:::I did it on their talk page instead. Here's the link, so you can follow up here on that discussion there if you wish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rosguill#Disagree_with_your_deletion [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 14:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		:::I did it on their talk page instead. Here's the link, so you can follow up here on that discussion there if you wish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rosguill#Disagree_with_your_deletion [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 14:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
	::::Their response sounds reasonable to me. Honestly tacos aren't in my editing scope; I'm just pointing out an ongoing need. The onus is on you if you want that info in the article. No need to passive aggressively poke using my post. If you want it in prove your case [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		::::Their response sounds reasonable to me. Honestly tacos aren't in my editing scope; I'm just pointing out an ongoing need. That one fact is just a drop in the pond; I'm asking for at least a 4x expansion of the section. The onus is on you if you want that info in the article. No need to passive aggressively poke using my post. If you want it in prove your case [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 14:56, 12 August 2024
Line 45:		Line 45:
	::In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite discussion. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		::In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite discussion. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
	:::I did it on their talk page instead. Here's the link, so you can follow up here on that discussion there if you wish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rosguill#Disagree_with_your_deletion [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 14:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		:::I did it on their talk page instead. Here's the link, so you can follow up here on that discussion there if you wish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rosguill#Disagree_with_your_deletion [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 14:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
			::::Their response sounds reasonable to me. Honestly tacos aren't in my editing scope; I'm just pointing out an ongoing need. The onus is on you if you want that info in the article. No need to passive aggressively poke using my post. If you want it in prove your case [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:56, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 14:48, 12 August 2024
Line 44:		Line 44:
	:I tried to add a small fact to the section and it was immediately reversed by a gatekeeper who said they didn't even read my cited scholarly journal article, and then they went and "corrected" other food-related topics and backed up their assertions by citing a pop-culture website. Probably not worth the effort. [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 12:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		:I tried to add a small fact to the section and it was immediately reversed by a gatekeeper who said they didn't even read my cited scholarly journal article, and then they went and "corrected" other food-related topics and backed up their assertions by citing a pop-culture website. Probably not worth the effort. [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 12:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
	::In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite discussion. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		::In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite discussion. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
			:::I did it on their talk page instead. Here's the link, so you can follow up here on that discussion there if you wish: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Rosguill#Disagree_with_your_deletion [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 14:48, 12 August 2024 (UTC)

← Previous revision		Revision as of 23:21, 20 May 2024
Line 36:		Line 36:
	:::I am geofenced and cannot get to the real ruling. [[Special:Contributions/2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F]] ([[User talk:2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|talk]]) 23:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)		:::I am geofenced and cannot get to the real ruling. [[Special:Contributions/2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F]] ([[User talk:2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|talk]]) 23:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
	::::Forget it: I found another ruling in a different state that explicitly states the opposite. Oh well: Court decisions in the US seem to be rather arbitrary. Sorry for bothering you people. [[Special:Contributions/2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F]] ([[User talk:2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|talk]]) 23:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)		::::Forget it: I found another ruling in a different state that explicitly states the opposite. Oh well: Court decisions in the US seem to be rather arbitrary. Sorry for bothering you people. [[Special:Contributions/2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F]] ([[User talk:2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F\|talk]]) 23:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
			:::::Really arbitrary, for sure. This was a single low-level court ruling to finesse an exception for a local zoning law. It's adorable and cute, which is why it's getting press, but has no real "official" legal bearing anywhere but Indiana, which is not exactly a Tex-Mex hub. This would be like a local Judge in Barcelona declaring that German Beer is really just bread-flavored sparkling water. ''[[User:Kuru\|Sam '''Kuru''']] [[User_talk:Kuru\|(talk)]]'' 23:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)