Virtue epistemology - Revision history

Jno.skinner: label image

2023-12-08T19:39:30Z

label image

← Previous revision		Revision as of 19:39, 8 December 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{Epistemology sidebar}}		{{Epistemology sidebar}}

	[[File:Virtue._La_Vertu_(NYPL_b14140320-1638489).jpg\|thumb\|right]]		[[File:Virtue._La_Vertu_(NYPL_b14140320-1638489).jpg\|thumb\|right\|A personification of [[virtue]]]]
	'''Virtue epistemology''' is a current [[philosophy\|philosophical]] approach to [[epistemology]] that stresses the importance of intellectual and specifically [[epistemic virtues]]. Virtue epistemology evaluates knowledge according to the properties of the persons who hold beliefs in addition to or instead of the properties of the propositions and beliefs. Some advocates of virtue epistemology also adhere to theories of [[virtue ethics]], while others see only loose analogy between virtue in ethics and virtue in epistemology.{{who\|date=April 2021}}		'''Virtue epistemology''' is a current [[philosophy\|philosophical]] approach to [[epistemology]] that stresses the importance of intellectual and specifically [[epistemic virtues]]. Virtue epistemology evaluates knowledge according to the properties of the persons who hold beliefs in addition to or instead of the properties of the propositions and beliefs. Some advocates of virtue epistemology also adhere to theories of [[virtue ethics]], while others see only loose analogy between virtue in ethics and virtue in epistemology.{{who\|date=April 2021}}

Me, Myself, and I are Here: fixed dashes using a script

2023-11-24T23:45:39Z

fixed dashes using a script

← Previous revision		Revision as of 23:45, 24 November 2023
Line 97:		Line 97:
	*Riggs, Wayne D. "Understanding 'Virtue' and the Virtue of Understanding." In ''Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology,'' ed. Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski, 203–226. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.		*Riggs, Wayne D. "Understanding 'Virtue' and the Virtue of Understanding." In ''Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology,'' ed. Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski, 203–226. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.
	*Roberts, Robert C. and W. Jay Wood. "Humility and Epistemic Goods." In ''Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology'', ed. Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski, 257–279. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.		*Roberts, Robert C. and W. Jay Wood. "Humility and Epistemic Goods." In ''Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology'', ed. Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski, 257–279. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.
	*Sosa, Ernest. "The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge." ''Midwest Studies in Philosophy'' 5, (1980): ~~3-25~~.		*Sosa, Ernest. "The Raft and the Pyramid: Coherence versus Foundations in the Theory of Knowledge." ''Midwest Studies in Philosophy'' 5, (1980): 3–25.
	*_____. "For the Love of Truth?" In ''Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility,'' ed. Abrol Fairweather and Linda Zagzebski, 49–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.		*_____. "For the Love of Truth?" In ''Virtue Epistemology: Essays on Epistemic Virtue and Responsibility,'' ed. Abrol Fairweather and Linda Zagzebski, 49–62. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
	*_____. "The Place of Truth in Epistemology." In ''Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology,'' ed. Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski, 155–179. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.		*_____. "The Place of Truth in Epistemology." In ''Intellectual Virtue: Perspectives from Ethics and Epistemology,'' ed. Michael DePaul and Linda Zagzebski, 155–179. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.

Talfa 5.5: Added a missing full stop.

2023-11-19T02:10:33Z

Added a missing full stop.

← Previous revision		Revision as of 02:10, 19 November 2023
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Intellectual virtue has been a subject of philosophy since the work of [[Aristotle]], but virtue epistemology is a development in the modern [[analytic philosophy\|analytic]] tradition. It is characterized by efforts to solve problems of special concern to modern epistemology, such as [[theory of justification\|justification]] and [[reliabilism]], by focusing on the knower as agent in a manner similar to how virtue ethics focuses on moral agents rather than moral acts.		Intellectual virtue has been a subject of philosophy since the work of [[Aristotle]], but virtue epistemology is a development in the modern [[analytic philosophy\|analytic]] tradition. It is characterized by efforts to solve problems of special concern to modern epistemology, such as [[theory of justification\|justification]] and [[reliabilism]], by focusing on the knower as agent in a manner similar to how virtue ethics focuses on moral agents rather than moral acts.

	The area has a parallel in the theory of [[Unity of knowledge and action]] proposed by Chinese philosopher [[Wang Yangming]]		The area has a parallel in the theory of [[Unity of knowledge and action]] proposed by Chinese philosopher [[Wang Yangming]].

	== The Raft and the Pyramid ==		== The Raft and the Pyramid ==

UzbukUdash: /* top */Added image #suggestededit-add-image-top

2023-10-23T07:15:20Z

top: Added image #suggestededit-add-image-top

← Previous revision		Revision as of 07:15, 23 October 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:
	{{Epistemology sidebar}}		{{Epistemology sidebar}}

			[[File:Virtue._La_Vertu_(NYPL_b14140320-1638489).jpg\|thumb\|right]]
	'''Virtue epistemology''' is a current [[philosophy\|philosophical]] approach to [[epistemology]] that stresses the importance of intellectual and specifically [[epistemic virtues]]. Virtue epistemology evaluates knowledge according to the properties of the persons who hold beliefs in addition to or instead of the properties of the propositions and beliefs. Some advocates of virtue epistemology also adhere to theories of [[virtue ethics]], while others see only loose analogy between virtue in ethics and virtue in epistemology.{{who\|date=April 2021}}		'''Virtue epistemology''' is a current [[philosophy\|philosophical]] approach to [[epistemology]] that stresses the importance of intellectual and specifically [[epistemic virtues]]. Virtue epistemology evaluates knowledge according to the properties of the persons who hold beliefs in addition to or instead of the properties of the propositions and beliefs. Some advocates of virtue epistemology also adhere to theories of [[virtue ethics]], while others see only loose analogy between virtue in ethics and virtue in epistemology.{{who\|date=April 2021}}

SchreiberBike: - Fix typo, pres → press - also some copy editing, typo(s) fixed: 158-77 → 158–77 (21)

2023-07-17T20:45:43Z

- Fix typo, pres → press - also some copy editing, typo(s) fixed: 158-77 → 158–77 (21)

Show changes

Carchasm: removed Category:Internalism and externalism using HotCat not WP:DEFINING

2023-06-15T06:46:09Z

removed Category:Internalism and externalism using HotCat not WP:DEFINING

← Previous revision		Revision as of 06:46, 15 June 2023
Line 118:		Line 118:
	[[Category:Epistemological schools and traditions]]		[[Category:Epistemological schools and traditions]]
	[[Category:Virtue ethics]]		[[Category:Virtue ethics]]
	[[Category:Internalism and externalism]]

Carchasm: removed Category:Epistemological theories; added Category:Epistemological schools and traditions using HotCat

2023-06-15T06:45:56Z

removed Category:Epistemological theories; added Category:Epistemological schools and traditions using HotCat

← Previous revision		Revision as of 06:45, 15 June 2023
Line 116:		Line 116:
	{{Authority control}}		{{Authority control}}
	[[Category:Justification (epistemology)]]		[[Category:Justification (epistemology)]]
	[[Category:Epistemological ~~theories~~]]		[[Category:Epistemological schools and traditions]]
	[[Category:Virtue ethics]]		[[Category:Virtue ethics]]
	[[Category:Internalism and externalism]]		[[Category:Internalism and externalism]]

Chris the speller: /* See also */replaced: See Also → See also

2023-06-06T04:02:01Z

See also: replaced: See Also → See also

← Previous revision		Revision as of 04:02, 6 June 2023
Line 69:		Line 69:
	Reliabilists might characterize this as effecting a drop in reliable functioning, whereas responsibilists would see these variations as negating one's excellent cognitive character. It is therefore argued that virtue theorists should either amend their conception of human psychology to accommodate this or explain how the results of situationist psychological research do not contradict their theory.		Reliabilists might characterize this as effecting a drop in reliable functioning, whereas responsibilists would see these variations as negating one's excellent cognitive character. It is therefore argued that virtue theorists should either amend their conception of human psychology to accommodate this or explain how the results of situationist psychological research do not contradict their theory.

	==See ~~Also~~==		==See also==

	* [[Unity of knowledge and action]]		* [[Unity of knowledge and action]]

Immanuelle at 23:53, 29 April 2023

2023-04-29T23:53:26Z

← Previous revision		Revision as of 23:53, 29 April 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{short description\|Philosophical approach}}		{{short description\|Philosophical approach}}{{Epistemology sidebar}}

	'''Virtue epistemology''' is a current [[philosophy\|philosophical]] approach to [[epistemology]] that stresses the importance of intellectual and specifically [[epistemic virtues]]. Virtue epistemology evaluates knowledge according to the properties of the persons who hold beliefs in addition to or instead of the properties of the propositions and beliefs. Some advocates of virtue epistemology also adhere to theories of [[virtue ethics]], while others see only loose analogy between virtue in ethics and virtue in epistemology.{{who\|date=April 2021}}		'''Virtue epistemology''' is a current [[philosophy\|philosophical]] approach to [[epistemology]] that stresses the importance of intellectual and specifically [[epistemic virtues]]. Virtue epistemology evaluates knowledge according to the properties of the persons who hold beliefs in addition to or instead of the properties of the propositions and beliefs. Some advocates of virtue epistemology also adhere to theories of [[virtue ethics]], while others see only loose analogy between virtue in ethics and virtue in epistemology.{{who\|date=April 2021}}

Immanuelle: /* References */

2023-04-29T23:53:03Z

References

← Previous revision		Revision as of 23:53, 29 April 2023
Line 3:		Line 3:

	Intellectual virtue has been a subject of philosophy since the work of [[Aristotle]], but virtue epistemology is a development in the modern [[analytic philosophy\|analytic]] tradition. It is characterized by efforts to solve problems of special concern to modern epistemology, such as [[theory of justification\|justification]] and [[reliabilism]], by focusing on the knower as agent in a manner similar to how virtue ethics focuses on moral agents rather than moral acts.		Intellectual virtue has been a subject of philosophy since the work of [[Aristotle]], but virtue epistemology is a development in the modern [[analytic philosophy\|analytic]] tradition. It is characterized by efforts to solve problems of special concern to modern epistemology, such as [[theory of justification\|justification]] and [[reliabilism]], by focusing on the knower as agent in a manner similar to how virtue ethics focuses on moral agents rather than moral acts.

			The area has a parallel in the theory of [[Unity of knowledge and action]] proposed by Chinese philosopher [[Wang Yangming]]

	== The Raft and the Pyramid ==		== The Raft and the Pyramid ==
Line 65:		Line 67:

	Reliabilists might characterize this as effecting a drop in reliable functioning, whereas responsibilists would see these variations as negating one's excellent cognitive character. It is therefore argued that virtue theorists should either amend their conception of human psychology to accommodate this or explain how the results of situationist psychological research do not contradict their theory.		Reliabilists might characterize this as effecting a drop in reliable functioning, whereas responsibilists would see these variations as negating one's excellent cognitive character. It is therefore argued that virtue theorists should either amend their conception of human psychology to accommodate this or explain how the results of situationist psychological research do not contradict their theory.

			==See Also==

			* [[Unity of knowledge and action]]

	==References==		==References==