User talk:Floquenbeam: Difference between revisions
Floquenbeam (talk | contribs) |
→July 2022: hate to do this, but it looks to me like the only way (rather frighteningly, trust me)....*sigh* Tag: Reverted |
||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
::I do have a sinking feeling that a 14-game losing streak is getting started, but I’m going to blame… regression to the mean? :P '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 21:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC) |
::I do have a sinking feeling that a 14-game losing streak is getting started, but I’m going to blame… regression to the mean? :P '''[[User:MastCell|MastCell]]''' <sup>[[User Talk:MastCell|Talk]]</sup> 21:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC) |
||
== July 2022 == |
|||
== Something I already told Svartava re:RcAlex36 == |
|||
Hello Floquenbeam, |
Hello Floquenbeam, |
||
Before you get too worried, this is NOT |
Before you get too worried, this is NOT an appeal of my WT block, but rather a NEW concern about the behavior of another user on my WT talkpage (that I sadly never noticed until July 5): |
||
If you look at [[wikt:User: |
If you look at [[wikt:User:RcAlex36]]'s messages [[wikt:User talk:Shāntián Tàiláng#Unblock_request_2021|here]], they sound like they're almost [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]], especially when you consider he said I was a "typical case" of {{linktext|死不足惜}} ("one's '''death''' is not or will not be a cause for regret", emphasis mine), even when I hadn't been edit-warring (disruptive editing, maybe, but ''not'' edit-warring; I had even thanked him for cleaning up after my bad edits previously). |
||
Also, RcAlex36's edit summary [https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sh%C4%81nti%C3%A1n_T%C3%A0il%C3%A1ng&diff=64455151&oldid=64448352 here] and [https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASh%C4%81nti%C3%A1n_T%C3%A0il%C3%A1ng&type=revision&diff=64462699&oldid=64462591 his reply] to my message about that edit seem {{linktext|uncalled-for}}, since on Wiktionary you're not supposed to link to an Alternative Form of a word (like {{linktext|off-colour}} as opposed to {{linktext|off-color}}) unless you're talking about the edit history of, or links made to, the page of that Alternative Form itself. |
Also, RcAlex36's edit summary [https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sh%C4%81nti%C3%A1n_T%C3%A0il%C3%A1ng&diff=64455151&oldid=64448352 here] and [https://en.wiktionary.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ASh%C4%81nti%C3%A1n_T%C3%A0il%C3%A1ng&type=revision&diff=64462699&oldid=64462591 his reply] to my message about that edit seem {{linktext|uncalled-for}}, since on Wiktionary you're not supposed to link to an Alternative Form of a word (like {{linktext|off-colour}} as opposed to {{linktext|off-color}}) unless you're talking about the edit history of, or links made to, the page of that Alternative Form itself. |
||
Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
Is what RcAlex36 did a crime? And if so, is there any way you can reprimand him for it? Thanks for your time. [[User:Shāntián Tàiláng|Shāntián Tàiláng]] ([[User talk:Shāntián Tàiláng|talk]]) 16:53, 25 July 2022 (UTC) |
Is what RcAlex36 did a crime? And if so, is there any way you can reprimand him for it? Thanks for your time. [[User:Shāntián Tàiláng|Shāntián Tàiláng]] ([[User talk:Shāntián Tàiláng|talk]]) 16:53, 25 July 2022 (UTC) |
||
:Sigh. |
:Sigh. I've had to block you indef. Hard to believe you thought this post was OK. I wish I had back the time I've spent trying to avoid blocking you. --[[User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam]] ([[User talk:Floquenbeam#top|talk]]) 17:08, 25 July 2022 (UTC) |
||
::Yes, but I wish *I* had back the time I spent [[WP:HA|harassing]] all those editors in the first place. (Sorry for any potential block violation Floq, but *sigh* this is [probably] my best chance at Taking Back The Foolish Things I Typed That Came Out Wrong. I did not WANT to make this post around my WT block, and you ARE right, I shoulda tried harder at avoiding that topic. I'm VERY sorry for this accidental dishonesty. Hey, you wanna be my proofreader or something?) (And one last thing, this is a [[WP:VALIDALT]] of mine on WP and Commons--please see the userbox on my main account's userpage.) [[User:Block Vader of the Sith|Block Vader of the Sith]] ([[User talk:Block Vader of the Sith|talk]]) 03:57, 27 July 2022 (UTC) |
|||
== Lego == |
== Lego == |
Revision as of 03:57, 27 July 2022
|
|
You know...
I'm not so sure they haven't been trolling this entire time. Who knows? PRAXIDICAE🌈 21:19, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- Well I don't know. But I do have an opinion. Which is becoming stronger as time goes on. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:26, 21 July 2022 (UTC)
- Surprise surprise. Looks like I missed all the excitement. --Floquenbeam (talk) 13:48, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
This is the year
Fourteen in a row... Ty France hitting north of .300, J-Rod tearing it up, Winkler winning fights with the whole Angels dugout, Logan Gilbert over 100 innings before the All-Star break... MastCell Talk 15:51, 22 July 2022 (UTC)
- You jinxed it! --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:59, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
- I do have a sinking feeling that a 14-game losing streak is getting started, but I’m going to blame… regression to the mean? :P MastCell Talk 21:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
Hello Floquenbeam,
Before you get too worried, this is NOT an appeal of my WT block, but rather a NEW concern about the behavior of another user on my WT talkpage (that I sadly never noticed until July 5):
If you look at wikt:User:RcAlex36's messages here, they sound like they're almost personal attacks, especially when you consider he said I was a "typical case" of 死不足惜 ("one's death is not or will not be a cause for regret", emphasis mine), even when I hadn't been edit-warring (disruptive editing, maybe, but not edit-warring; I had even thanked him for cleaning up after my bad edits previously).
Also, RcAlex36's edit summary here and his reply to my message about that edit seem uncalled-for, since on Wiktionary you're not supposed to link to an Alternative Form of a word (like off-colour as opposed to off-color) unless you're talking about the edit history of, or links made to, the page of that Alternative Form itself.
Is what RcAlex36 did a crime? And if so, is there any way you can reprimand him for it? Thanks for your time. Shāntián Tàiláng (talk) 16:53, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
- Sigh. I've had to block you indef. Hard to believe you thought this post was OK. I wish I had back the time I've spent trying to avoid blocking you. --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:08, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
- Yes, but I wish *I* had back the time I spent harassing all those editors in the first place. (Sorry for any potential block violation Floq, but *sigh* this is [probably] my best chance at Taking Back The Foolish Things I Typed That Came Out Wrong. I did not WANT to make this post around my WT block, and you ARE right, I shoulda tried harder at avoiding that topic. I'm VERY sorry for this accidental dishonesty. Hey, you wanna be my proofreader or something?) (And one last thing, this is a WP:VALIDALT of mine on WP and Commons--please see the userbox on my main account's userpage.) Block Vader of the Sith (talk) 03:57, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
Lego
I don't get it Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:19, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
- What I thought he meant was "Doug Weller and his toys" (because sometime previous he referenced someone - maybe Doug, I can't recall - throwing toys out of their pram). What he apparently meant was "Doug, like Lego, makes billions of blocks". I suppose marginally better. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:30, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
- Well, that's his job. Deepfriedokra (talk) 22:54, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
Shāntián Tàiláng/IPBE
There's a valid reason for the IPBE (tl;dr caught in a hard block of a residential range that will be lifted a few centuries after the rapture), but since they're actually blocked now, I do think it is a bit weird that they have it. We'd probably regrant if they were ever unblocked just because its one of the few IPBEs that is because of a residential range and not VPNs, though. Meh. Use your judgement on what to do with it. Just thought I should flag it for you. TonyBallioni (talk) 05:37, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks, I've removed it with (I hope) a clear enough explanation. I hadn't thought to look. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:15, 26 July 2022 (UTC)