Talk:CampusJ: Difference between revisions
m moved Talk:Campusj to Talk:CampusJ: Correcting capitalisation: CampusJ. |
school list |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I put no personal or qualitative assessments into it; it's strictly a few facts that are indisputable, and some links to stories about it. {{unsigned| Steveniweiss|14:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)}} |
I put no personal or qualitative assessments into it; it's strictly a few facts that are indisputable, and some links to stories about it. {{unsigned| Steveniweiss|14:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)}} |
||
== school list == |
|||
There is nothing wrong with using a copied list from a website. This doesn't violate any wikipedia policy, because all of the schools are notable. What's the problem here with providing more info?--[[User:Urthogie|Urthogie]] 05:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 05:14, 14 March 2007
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 2007-03-05. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
This article
There's nothing immediately apparent that makes this article more advertising-like than that about, for example, the Jewish Telegraphic Agency. If CampusJ had been the subject of controversies or somesuch, those would certainly be noted, but it hasn't.
The only reason I'm the one who made this page is because someone else who'd tried to make one about CampusJ previously hadn't produced one that met the notability standard of several independent articles on the topic, because he didn't know where to find that coverage. That person contacted me, so I put one up myself that was largely similar to his original (but obviously I couldn't make it identical), except that it included several such articles, in order to fulfill the notability standard.
I put no personal or qualitative assessments into it; it's strictly a few facts that are indisputable, and some links to stories about it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Steveniweiss (talk • contribs) 14:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
school list
There is nothing wrong with using a copied list from a website. This doesn't violate any wikipedia policy, because all of the schools are notable. What's the problem here with providing more info?--Urthogie 05:14, 14 March 2007 (UTC)