Revision as of 06:58, 28 July 2023 edit Osunpokeh (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,003 edits replaced "proposed" with "claimed" in header Tags: Reverted Visual edit ← Previous edit		Revision as of 07:25, 28 July 2023 edit undo Sladen (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 27,472 edits politely revert per MOS:CLAIMED; (please try to keep working compatible with Wikipedia's manual of style, and avoid deleting citations) Tag: Undo Next edit →
Line 24: }} '''LK-99''' is a ~~claimed~~proposed [[ambient pressure]] and [[room-temperature superconductor]] with a gray‒black appearance.{{r\|sukbae-2023\|p=8}} LK-99 has a hexagonal structure slightly modified from [[lead]]‒[[apatite]] and is claimed to function as a superconductor below {{convert\|400\|K\|C F\|lk=in}}.{{r\|sukbae-2023b}}{{r\|sukbae-2023\|p=1}} The material was investigated by a team of Sukbae Lee, Ji-Hoon Kim, ''et al.'' from the [[Korea Institute of Science and Technology]] (KIST).{{r\|sukbae-2023\|p=1}} {{As of\|2023\|7\|26}} the discovery of LK-99 superconductivity has not been [[peer review]]ed or independently [[Reproducibility\|replicated]].{{r\|flaherty-20230626}} Line 93: == Response == {{As of\|2023\|07\|26}}, the measured properties do not prove that LK-99 is a superconductor as they do not fully explain how the LK-99's magnetisation can change, nor its specific heat capacity.{{r\|padavic-c-20230726}} Media reports on the reported discovery mentioned the concurrent retractions of fraudulent research on high temperature superconductors by [[Ranga P. Dias]]. Scientists speculated that the material could be strongly [[Diamagnetism\|diamagnetic]], but perhaps not [[Superdiamagnetism\|diamagnetic enough]] to become a superconductor.{{r\|ritchie-20230726}} An alternative explanation for LK-99's stated reaction to magnets could be [[diamagnetism]].{{r\|ritchie-20230726}} ==References==

LK-99: Difference between revisions