Talk:Taco: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:31, 12 August 2024

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Taco article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2: 30 days

Mexico Mid‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Food and drink: Breakfast High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of the Breakfast task force, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

There is a request, submitted by Lionsdude148, for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia.

The rationale behind the request is: "Important".

Where are Birria Tacos in the Variations part of this article?

Like they taste amazing and are one of the most liked Taco variants! 2003:EA:4F4F:CFC4:5CEE:5F71:F590:D30E (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea. Just added. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 18:18, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ty 91.17.132.99 (talk) 17:48, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Costa Rica and other countries...

So I guess we know the taco originated in Mexico and is also popular in the USA. But I am on Reddit a lot and in some Costa Rican subreddit, tourists keep mentioning a joint called (I think) "SpecTACOlar". Do they have their own taco traditions or is it just a popular dish there like in the USA? Should any other countries be mentioned in this article? YellowAries2010 (talk) 06:35, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Taco is officially classified as sandwich in the US

According to a court ruling discussed by the attorney Steve Letho in his Youtube channel (video is titled "Court Rules:A Taco is A 'Sandwich'"), a taco is now officially classified as [Sandwich]. I am not allowed to edit this into the Wikipedia article, but others might. If so, please do.--2003:D6:371C:E700:60DE:13C2:F30D:F893 (talk) 15:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Depending on which sources have covered this, this may not be WP:DUE for mention in this article. The more and higher quality the sources provided, the more detail becomes DUE to include. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 15:39, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What is the implication of your statement? 2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F (talk) 22:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you read the article, (WP:DUE)? To quote: "Wikipedia should not present a [fact] as if a view held by a small minority is as significant as the majority view. Views held by a tiny minority should not be represented except in articles devoted to those views (such as the flat Earth). Giving undue weight to the view of a significant minority or including that of a tiny minority might be misleading as to the shape of the dispute. Wikipedia aims to present competing views in proportion to their representation in reliable sources on the subject." One statement by one YouTube personality about one court's view is likely such a tiny minority. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 22:57, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but are court decisions treated as "small minority views" in the US? I am puzzled.

If you need a source, start with this one: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/18/dining/taco-sandwich-indiana-mexico.html

I am geofenced and cannot get to the real ruling. 2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F (talk) 23:05, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forget it: I found another ruling in a different state that explicitly states the opposite. Oh well: Court decisions in the US seem to be rather arbitrary. Sorry for bothering you people. 2003:D6:371C:E700:C889:3615:1F0D:E4F (talk) 23:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Really arbitrary, for sure. This was a single low-level court ruling to finesse an exception for a local zoning law. It's adorable and cute, which is why it's getting press, but has no real "official" legal bearing anywhere but Indiana, which is not exactly a Tex-Mex hub. This would be like a local Judge in Barcelona declaring that German Beer is really just bread-flavored sparkling water. Sam Kuru (talk) 23:21, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

History section

The history section is pretty lacking imo. Could use expansion and more rigor, especially given how important the food is culturally. Maybe just me, but food history is often lacking on Wikipedia seefooddiet (talk) 06:53, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to add a small fact to the section and it was immediately reversed by a gatekeeper who said they didn't even read my cited scholarly journal article, and then they went and "corrected" other food-related topics and backed up their assertions by citing a pop-culture website. Probably not worth the effort. Wikipedian-in-Waiting (talk) 12:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite discussion. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. seefooddiet (talk) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 14:30, 12 August 2024 edit Seefooddiet (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 13,594 edits →History section: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 14:31, 12 August 2024 edit undo Seefooddiet (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users 13,594 edits →History section: Typo Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit Next edit →
Line 43:		Line 43:

	:I tried to add a small fact to the section and it was immediately reversed by a gatekeeper who said they didn't even read my cited scholarly journal article, and then they went and "corrected" other food-related topics and backed up their assertions by citing a pop-culture website. Probably not worth the effort. [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 12:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		:I tried to add a small fact to the section and it was immediately reversed by a gatekeeper who said they didn't even read my cited scholarly journal article, and then they went and "corrected" other food-related topics and backed up their assertions by citing a pop-culture website. Probably not worth the effort. [[User:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|Wikipedian-in-Waiting]] ([[User talk:Wikipedian-in-Waiting\|talk]]) 12:54, 12 August 2024 (UTC)
	::In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite ~~discussions~~. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)		::In these kinds of scenarios you could/should make a post on the talk page and tag the user for a polite discussion. It's not infeasible to reach an understanding in this method; I do this often and provided I have good evidence I usually get my way. [[User:seefooddiet\|seefooddiet]] ([[User talk:seefooddiet\|talk]]) 14:30, 12 August 2024 (UTC)