User talk:TheClownPrinceofCrime: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 14:01, 1 June 2007

Welcome

Glad to know you care. SaliereTheFish 19:15, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually...truth to tell, if not for his outlandish mode of Speech and the places he edits, I wouldn't have even been sure it was him. Somehow I thought Mods could tell by tracing the IP address...

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 Actually...truth to tell, if not for his outlandish mode of Speech and the places he edits, I wouldn't have even been sure it was him. Somehow I thought Mods could tell by tracing the IP address...
-== Saiyan Saga ==
-I have reverted your edits, I know you mean well but the term, "Vegeta Saga" was coined by Funimation and Wikipedia is not using the Funimation dub as the basis for its names. Thank you. [[User:DBZROCKS|DBZROCKS]]<small>[[User talk:DBZROCKS|Its over 9000!!!]]</small> 00:05, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
-:If you really want to continue this go to the talk page for [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Anime and manga/Dragon Ball]] because I am really not in the mood for this right now. [[User:DBZROCKS|DBZROCKS]]<small>[[User talk:DBZROCKS|Its over 9000!!!]]</small> 00:09, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
-::I ment to go to the talk page for it and put a discussion there instead of just changing it. Go there and you will see. [[User:DBZROCKS|DBZROCKS]]<small>[[User talk:DBZROCKS|Its over 9000!!!]]</small> 00:16, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
-{{{icon|[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|30px|]] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit war|edit war]]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Vegeta|&#32; according to the reverts you have made on [[:Vegeta]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. If you continue, you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 01:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
-I do point out this guidelines from the Dragon Ball project DBZROCKS mentioned above: "All information should be based on the original versions. Mainly, this will mean the Japanese versions (though at least one video game will refer to the English version). Because there are so many, no single English adaptation can be used as the English version. Besides the out-of-print adaptations, there are at least three English anime dubs and another company doing the manga, as well as another company translating the video games (which has been inconsistent at best). It would be inappropriate to pick any single distribution company over another." —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 01:33, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
-==Response==
-I don't know why I bother... We at [[WP:DBZ]] discussed what naming format we were going to use between December 2006 and January 2007 for the last time following a controversy on the proper name of Grampa Gohan wich back then had a full article, the result of the discussion was to use the original names for both characters and sagas, the reason behind this is that the original Japanese format is used more broadly around the world. Funimation's domain comprises only North America and one island in the Caribbean (Puerto Rico), it's not the official world wide version as many seem to think. -[[User:Dark Dragon Flame|<big>'''凶'''<big>]] 01:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
-:I know the Spanish version does (Spain not Mexico) as well as the Portugese one, we made this change to avoid edit war like the one you are involved in right now and we will enforce it. -[[User:Dark Dragon Flame|<big>'''凶'''<big>]] 01:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
-::What, are you serious? where is a treat in that comment, but take it as a warning if you want you will be reported for breaking the 3RR if you continue this senseless editwar. -[[User:Dark Dragon Flame|<big>'''凶'''<big>]] 01:36, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
-Edit warring, insulting other users, and an overall disruptive behaviour. We gave you plenty of chances to discuss this minor little title yet you ignored us. No more chances; you're being reported. // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Decaimiento'''''</font><font color="purple">'''''Poético'''''</font>]] 01:41, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
-:You know what? I really don't care. We gave you plenty of chances to change your ways yet you continued to act against us, ensuing in an edit war instead of simply discussing the matter on the talk page like a civilized user. // [[User talk:Poetic Decay|<font color="black">'''''Decaimiento'''''</font><font color="purple">'''''Poético'''''</font>]] 01:46, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
-::I'll be echoing this to the talk pages of you both, but here's what I'm seeing:
-::#An edit to make a change.
-::#Reversion of the change citing the Wikiproject standard.
-::#Reversion/"discussion" via edit summary.
-::#Edit war ensues.
-::The place to settle this is the talk page. The project allows for an override at the article level, but it needs to be done through consensus, not unilaterally. I do point out to TheClownPrinceofCrime that the onus is on you to make a persuasive case, since you're requesting a change from what's established Wikiproject article structure. —'''[[User:C.Fred|C.Fred]]''' ([[User_talk:C.Fred|talk]]) 01:42, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
-<div style="padding:5px; border:1px solid #c0c090; background-color:#FEC;" class="user-block"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left]]  You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{time|}}}|a period of '''{{{time}}}'''|a short time}} in accordance with [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|Wikipedia's blocking policy]] for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dark_Dragon_Flame&diff=prev&oldid=134711536 making] [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]]|'''[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dark_Dragon_Flame&diff=prev&oldid=134711536 making] [[WP:NPA|personal attacks]]'''|repeated [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|abuse of editing privileges]]}}.  Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions.  If you believe this block is unjustified, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|contest the block]] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:1|··[[ user: coelacan |coe<span style=" font-variant: small-caps" >l</span>]][[ user talk: coelacan |acan]] 01:52, 31 May 2007 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 -->
-{{unblock reviewed|1=because i tried to discuss this on the talk page and nobody would do that. All ive tried is to improve this page which needs the improvement. The DBZ pages are in bad shape as it is and this so called group of DBZ editors are doing lousy jobs of it. They should be banned as well bc they refuse to discuss it they just automatically assume im wrong.|decline=That is not a valid excuse for your behavior. — '''[[User:Kurykh|<font color="#0000C0" face="cursive">Kurykh</font>]]''' 02:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)}}
-{{unblock reviewed|1=They are having a convo that talks about trying to get me blocked and hes harrassing me right now by calling me a newb!|decline=Again, you are giving no reason why you should be unblocked.  Just let this block expire, read up in the consensus that was reached in January, and if you have issues, discuss in a civil manner on the relevant talk page.  — [[User:Stephen|<b>Steve</b> <sub> (Stephen) </sub>]][[User talk:Stephen|<sup> talk </sup>]] 03:01, 31 May 2007 (UTC)}}
-I provided plenty of reason!