User talk:Jéské Couriano/Archive 3: Difference between revisions

NOTE: If you leave a message for me here, I will respond to it here.

SHA-1

User:Hairchrm/sha1 - Hairchrm 02:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

mawile talk page

On the mawile talk page someone was talking about how it is usefull and i said that "i dont know if it helps but mawile is my second best pokemon and that faint attack is very usefull" and it says you reverted it and said that it was spam, i was not spamming! i was trying to help the person out by saying some other things about it being useful!-hotspot

It was removed because Talk:Mawile is not a forum for general discussion on Mawile. If you'd looked at the link, it is reasonable you would have figured the "Spam" designation was sarcasm. Besides, whether it is useful or not is a moot point. Wikipedia is not the place to post how "useful" a particular Poke is, as I'd already stated on the talk page. -Jeske ^{(v^_^v)} 02:39, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Lo siento

If you don't know Spanish, that means "I'm sorry." When I said "leader," I only meant that you were one of thoe three who makes nearly all the edits to the Pokemon articles along with Urutapu and Mcy. I wasn't judging based on your actual edits. Sorry for confusion. A trivial matter, as far as I'm concerned. --Ksy92003 (talk) 05:57, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

I understand the confusion. -Jeske ^{(v^_^v)} 12:54, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Removal of Pokémon image templates

As far as notifying the relevant WikiProject, that's not up to me, that was up to the nominator. I was merely the closing administrator. ^demon^{[omg plz]} 02:36, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I have already told him. -Jeske ^{(v^_^v)} 02:40, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

There is no duty on the nominator to notify anyone. It's nice, but it's not compulsory. Do not chastise nominators in XfD processes for your own failure to observe your watchlist. 81.104.175.145 03:21, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

I didn't even know the TfD existed, so you might want to recant your last statement. -Jeske ^{(v^_^v)} 03:47, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

You didn't know, but it's not the nominator's fault that you didn't know. 81.104.175.145 04:03, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Why do you say that? I don't patrol WP:TfD or recent changes, and I've been busy at other avenues during the time the TfD was going on and didn't have time to look, either. Besides, since the TfD involved a project, I would have suspected someone would have notified everyone else. As far as I know, the whole project, sans Amarkov (who forgot about it), did not know an iota about it.-Jeske ^{(v^_^v)} 04:06, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Exactly. You could reasonably expect that someone would have spotted it, but nobody did. Therefore, not the nominator's fault. 81.104.175.145 04:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

One cannot watch what one did not know existed. Think about that before you chastise me. -Jeske ^{(v^_^v)} 03:52, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

What's your point? I'm not telling you off for missing it on your watchlist. I'm telling you off for chastising a TfD nominator for something that wasn't their problem. 81.104.175.145 04:20, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

D&D wiki project consensus

The whole polling issue is working wonderfully. Yes everyone is disagreeing with me which is great. And that's exactly what I want everyone to come together and agree. Everyone can disagree with me as long as everyone disagrees with me. I've never liked the idea of a representative democracy. Why is it that two or three people who were not elected get to decide for everyone? But more importantly decisions are being made as to what to do when we have to disambiguate. And as soon as everyone are at least a majority has said no which they will I will be more than happy to go in and change all the pages that I have rerouted myself. Do you understand now what I was trying to accomplish?

But was there a need for a straw poll? -Jeske ^{(v^_^v)} 13:10, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Mudkips

File:Emerald-Mudkip.png

I find your racist actions against Mudkips morally reprehensible, sir. You asked for reliable sources. We provided sources that the vast majority here considers reliable. 4chan is a reliable source: we have consistently used the meme for months. Just because you do not like the meme does not give you the right to block it's inclusion here. You are in the minority on the Mudkip inclusion issue, sir. Vast numbers of people have claimed that the meme sources such as 4chan are reliable.

You are in the minority now. You have overstepped the boundaries of your position, and you have allowed your personal bias to lead you to oppose the clear majority. 75.68.162.162 01:20, 15 June 2007 (UTC)