User talk:Gogo Dodo: Difference between revisions

Smile!

WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

-WarthogDemon 01:51, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

So I see, judging from your talk page in my watchlist. O.o Here's hoping July is good. :D -WarthogDemon 01:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Recreating deleted page

Dear Dodo, I have recreated the CD Publishing page has thsi small indepednent publisher is newworthy for their role in the protest against the Iraq war. They were the only publishers that published the reprt on the trials before the Iraq Special Tribunal. Please let me knwo if this is a problem. Robert — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobertKaplan (talk • contribs)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 18:47, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: CD Publishing article deletion

I think we disagree over its notability. While I agree it has not been mentioned in books it was a features publisher at the London Book Show in 2005 and has been mentioned on several TV and radio programs. Is there any way we can get an independent assessment of this dispute? — Preceding unsigned comment added by RobertKaplan (talk • contribs)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 17:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you for participating in my RfA. It was successful, and I am now, may God have mercy on us all, an administrator. Look at all the new buttons! I had heard about 'protect,' 'block user,' and 'delete,' but no one told me about 'kill,' 'eject,' and 'purée.' I appreciate the trust the community has in me, and I'll try hard not to delete the main page or block Jimbo. -FisherQueen (Talk) 18:12, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Beauty and the Beast (2003 film)

I have just completed an article for a movie: Beauty and the Beast (2003 film). Could you give it a quick look over to make sure it's not missing anything major and is article-worthy? -WarthogDemon 00:02, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:19, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Think it has any chance? It does have links to 3 actors, though I know that links don't equal notability. Is there any other major sources I could look around for to help strengthen it? -WarthogDemon 00:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 03:06, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Shark attack

Thanks for the advice! Brianga 05:53, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Dave Messina: The Real Deal

Dear Godo Dodo, You recently deleted the page for the movie Dave Messina: The Real Deal because you said it was not "notable". In actuality, this movie is very notable. It was a notable independent film and of great pride to the people of New Britain. You see, this city does contribute a lot of art, but never has a movie been conceptualized, filmed, edited, and produced within this city. The premiere was a big deal and was very notable. I saw that on Wikipedia there was not much about New Britain except its own article and there was nothing on New Britain High School except a stub. Which I find very odd, since New Britain is an important city in Connecticut's history. So I created that article. You wanted sources so I have put the article back up this time with links at the bottom to its trailer, teaser, and official Myspace page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hardhittin'06 (talk • contribs)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 03:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

I'll Have To Make You Smile With Something More Than A Smile

WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Too bad you're not getting vandals who harrass me. There's one right now trying to do so and honestly I'm finding it slightly humorous. (Though at the same time I do empathize, as I have been in this vandal's place before, article wise.) Anyway, if you need cheering up, here's a page that ALWAYS gets me laughing: [1]. Enjoy. :) -WarthogDemon 04:21, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 20:31, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Apologies

Sorry, I will try to be more thorough when filling out possible vandalism reports. Again, sorry. Peace. Spartan-James 05:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 20:32, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Talk Pages & Redirects

You left a message for me on my talk page; I've posted a response. I thought I'd give you a heads-up.  — AnnaKucsma   (Talk to me!) 19:58, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 20:10, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Deleted Page As I Made An AfD

Not that I'm complaining, but you might as well delete [[2]] now. I thought it'd be okay to give that article a chance since I didn't know if Junior League was any chance of notability or not. -WarthogDemon 05:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:23, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Even if you had, it wouldn't have irritated me. I trust your judgment on these things. :) -WarthogDemon 05:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:31, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Thugman123

I am very sorry that I wrote the word bagels on stlye's wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thugman123 (talk • contribs)

You said you will block me does this mean just my account or my whole computer. -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Thugman123 (talk • contribs).

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 06:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

All right thanks for answering my question user: gogo dodo. I will take what you said in to consideration. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thugman123 (talk • contribs)

Thugman123

What is a sockpuppet, angus lepper--the bagel bandit A.K.A. Thugman123

Wikipedia:Sock puppetry. -- 01:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Moved from user page

hi, are you the same gogo dodo i used to know in sri lanka in 1992?

- sandipani gandipad —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 122.161.84.28 (talk • contribs).

Probably not. -- Gogo Dodo 20:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

User:Thugman123 and User:Hpsander456

I noticed you dealing with the first of this pair — I'm suspicious about a possible connection between the two (possibly socks). Hpsander has "Wikipedians who like being thug" as a category on their page, in addition to the category "Wikipedians who hate being played like a sucker", which was also added to the userpage of Thugman123 by User:Frank Anchor (see User talk:Frank Anchor), which also raises the possibility of a connection there. The only three members of that category are Thugman123 (now removed), Frank Anchor, and Hpsander456. Also, Thugman123 and Hpsander456 seem similar in that their nicks end in the sequence of digits (123/456) and both have bizarre editing habits, with each having edits flippantly proclaiming their love of bagels and cake, respectively. I'm not sure what to do to officially raise the possibility of their being socks, and I'm also aware that sockpuppets are allowed so long as they aren't abused, so I don't want to do anything. I just thought it worth maybe keeping an eye on? Angus Lepper^{(T, C, D)} 13:16, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 04:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Template

Did you delete the Bibliotheque sig template? If you didn't, please do so. --Bibliotheque 05:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:41, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

List of Mexicans

Thanks for the help! Poindexter Propellerhead 06:35, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Going Insane Over A Tag

When you find a sentence or paragraph that needs to be sourced, what tag do you use? I tried {{cite}}, {{source}}, and variations thereof but I can't find anything. I searched the templates and found nothing. I know such a thing exists . . . am I going mad or is it somewhere obvious that I can't see? -WarthogDemon 02:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 17:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. =) That was just driving me crazy. Nice cartoon as well to boot. O_o -WarthogDemon 19:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for telling me. Someone else did something to some article, writing about gnomes. Must have pushed the wrong button and put the warning on the wrong talk page. VK35 18:37, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 18:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Cheers

Thanks for watching over my user page - happy vandal hunting. Dust Filter 00:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. =) -- Gogo Dodo 00:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Mix up

I was protecting the talk page of the German...holocaust... vandal and accidentally undid your protection of the page. I reset it for 6 months, but I thought I'd drop you a line if you'd prefer a different duration. Sorry about that! --Fire Star 火星 00:54, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 00:59, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert

You got to that change mere seconds before I did. Amazing! --omtay38 07:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

You're welcome. =) -- Gogo Dodo 07:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

No less of an opinion

My edit to Deadliest Catch is no less of an opinion than saying that the job may be the deadliest in the world. Seriously, does anyone think those lobster fishermen have a harder job than anyone that lives in a war torn nation? I doubt it. EdRooney

Vandalism sir?

Googoo doodoo, my recent additions to Wikipedia were not in any way executed in a malicious purpose. A virus in my computer has unfortunately compromised my typing by taking control sometimes, thus resulting in "blanked" and "chopped-up and mutilated" articles. please do not punish me administrator sir — Preceding unsigned comment added by E3992117 (talk • contribs)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 06:23, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Further Vandalism

To your knowledge, has an administrator ever assisted the the vandalism of an article? Today i came across at least a half dozen articles that have not been corrected. Is there a glitch in the security bots perhaps? — Preceding unsigned comment added by E3992117 (talk • contribs)

vandalism mishap

that last comment was accidentaly placed in the wrong field and identified as vandalism on your page by another user, will this count against me in future edits? -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by E3992117 (talk • contribs).

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Sdk 813 and Da8 kd2

I was just about to block those two (I reverted all of their userpage edits), but you got there first. :) Kudos, Black Falcon ^(Talk) 06:10, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 06:18, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

I suppose I missed out on the thrill and exhilaration of blocking a sockpuppet this time. :P I encountered the edits in essentially the same way. I was checking through recent category creations and noticed that multiple categories were being created for sockpuppets of editors whom I recognise – suffice it to say it piqued my interest. I would have blocked earlier but I was distracted by something over at WP:NPOV. As for your hope that he'll give up someday ... well, it just wouldn't be the same if blocked editors didn't continually try to evade blocks with numerous obvious sockpuppets for months after their indef-block, now would it? ;) That's probably enough abuse of WP:BEANS from me for today. Cheers, Black Falcon ^(Talk) 06:45, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:21, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Well, he was back at it just a few hours ago (see [3]). I also for the first time noticed the number of pages in Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of SummerThunder. Sad, indeed. -- Black Falcon ^(Talk) 05:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:49, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Re: protections. OK, will do. Black Falcon ^(Talk) 05:51, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Anonymous vandalism to Fish

I reverted vandalism to the article Fish last night. The vandalism was done by an anonymous user with the IP address 75.63.233.103. This is the vandalism:

The term "fish" is most precisely used to describe any non-tetrapod chordate, i.e., a human with a cap, has grillzs throughout life, and have gangsters, if any, in the shape of deodorant.

Savie Kumara 00:27, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:12, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Troublemaker

The user Basekid25 has blanked significant portions from the Dog, All the Stuff (And More!) Volume 1, and Stuff (cloth) articles. I have reverted these changes, and all the vandalism was done today. Basekid25 needs something or someone to stop him before he strikes again. Savie Kumara 21:29, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 22:28, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

I have warned the vandal accordingly. Hope I didn't do anything bad by it. Savie Kumara 23:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 00:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Protection request

I think you should protect the page User talk:24.152.168.241, as 24.152.168.241 replaced the warning and block messages with 400 kb of attacks against Wikipedia. Hydrogen Iodide 08:27, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 08:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Warrior (wrestler) vandalism

Don't worry. I'll revert it. I've been trying to do so, but have been beaten every time. Savie Kumara 04:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 04:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Drat! Now I can't revert anything! I've tried multiple times to get just one revert in on that article, and now it's protected...=(( Maybe I can be referred to other active vandals...I'm an aspiring vandal fighter. Is there any way to arrange that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Savie Kumara (talk • contribs)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 04:48, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Variety

I did find a stub that I hope to get around to expanding the other day, called Flabellifera. And you're right. I should incorporate more variety in my contributions. I'll try to work on that. I just got quite a bit "Vandal-Fight-Happy" today, offering to take on multiple vandals' reverts. Savie Kumara 04:53, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Back again

User:Typocent would seem to be a sock of User:Doubtuser and User:Rangesoap, if you want to keep an eye on the Warrior (wrestler) talk page FlowerpotmaN·(t) 05:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 05:12, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Guys, let's keep a lookout for Rangesoap and his sockpuppets four days from now. If he's familiar with Wikipedia policy, he might make another sockpuppet, wait four days, and vandalize again. I have posted the same message on Flowerpotman's talk page.Savie Kumara 05:14, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Spam links

Thanks for that, if it keeps happening I now know where to go. I will add the link to my user page for future use. Mindys12345स्वागतम्! এই সভ্যজন অসমৰॐ शान्ति ! शान्ति !! शान्ति !!!

Extreme Group

I recently created a page that YOU deleted.. it's called Extreme Group. It wasn't doing anyhting wrong, seeing as I own all the copyrights anyways. You didn't even check! Whats going on??! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Extremeinternational (talk • contribs).

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 17:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for blocking User:Emd33 and for reverting their vandalism on my user page. Angel Of Sadness ^T/C 18:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 18:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Once Again Not A Problem

My pleasure. :) -WarthogDemon 20:05, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

The Bongwarrior hater vandalism

Thank you for your concern. If this happens again, I might make a different account to avoid his vandalism. I've already read the Sockpuppet policies. However, if I do make a new account, I'll use my old one until the new one is "official" and I can edit semi-protected pages and fix vandalism on them. I do not wish to provide any links between the two accounts if this happens, for security purposes. I've learned my lesson--never get involved when someone is vandalizing another user's pages out of hatred. Savie Kumara 22:43, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 23:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Oh, my gosh. Some of that stuff was outright appalling, what with a picture of diseased...whatever. And I thought I got it bad... Savie Kumara 00:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Replied to your Talk page. -- Gogo Dodo 04:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Rodney burrell

I think I bit off a bit more than I can chew . . . can you handle this: Rodney burrell? -WarthogDemon 04:36, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Thanks. I was a bit concerned that this was a sticky situation... -WarthogDemon 04:44, 18 July 2007 (UTC)