User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2007/2/: Difference between revisions
Ghirlandajo (talk | contribs) →Incivil remarks: new section |
|||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
It's enough to protect the page from moves, I agree. And honestly I don't think we even need a move protection; it is evident the only disputed move is the one done by Ghirlandajo - all others were a response to his controversial and undiscussed action ([[WP:POINT]], anyone?).--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus| Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 21:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
It's enough to protect the page from moves, I agree. And honestly I don't think we even need a move protection; it is evident the only disputed move is the one done by Ghirlandajo - all others were a response to his controversial and undiscussed action ([[WP:POINT]], anyone?).--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus| Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 21:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
:Indeed. Should we leave some message for him about this not being the most constructive editing action?--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus| Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 21:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
:Indeed. Should we leave some message for him about this not being the most constructive editing action?--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">[[User:Piotrus| Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ]]|[[User_talk:Piotrus|<font style="color:#7CFC00;background:#006400;"> talk </font>]]</span></sub> 21:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
||
== Incivil remarks == |
|||
What did I do to you to deserve being called a "paranoid loon"? Who do you think you are to insult me in this fashion? --[[User:Ghirlandajo|Ghirla]]<sup>[[User_talk:Ghirlandajo|-трёп-]]</sup> 16:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:46, 14 September 2007
Archives:
- User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2004/1/
- User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2004/2/
- User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2004/3/
- User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2004/4/
- User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2005/1/
- User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2005/2/
- User talk:Cyrius/Archive/2007/1/
I undid your revisions on this article. As far fetched as this claim is, it's still the claim that is proclaimed by some of the proponents of the photon belt belief. Taemyr 20:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Even USGS messed up
Understood, I was just following USGS initial reports, reporting a 7.7 and 7.5. T Rex | talk 02:12, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- Doesn't help that its breaking news on a few channels either. T Rex | talk 02:14, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Sparrowman980
He seems to be trying to follow the Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you non-policy. -- Cyrius|✎ 12:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah. He started off on Wikipedia with persistent copyright violations, moved on to incivility, then engaged in a bit of revert warring and templating the regulars. Now he's moved on to further edit warring and unleashed a few personal attacks. But I'm a nice guy. :) -- RG2 16:38, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
It's enough to protect the page from moves, I agree. And honestly I don't think we even need a move protection; it is evident the only disputed move is the one done by Ghirlandajo - all others were a response to his controversial and undiscussed action (WP:POINT, anyone?).-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 21:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed. Should we leave some message for him about this not being the most constructive editing action?-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 21:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
Incivil remarks
What did I do to you to deserve being called a "paranoid loon"? Who do you think you are to insult me in this fashion? --Ghirla-трёп- 16:46, 14 September 2007 (UTC)