Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Escalator Productivity: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:27, 18 September 2005

Escalator Productivity

This isn't complete gibberish, so I guess it can't be speedily deleted. It ought to go away, though, leaving no trace. Pilatus 15:39, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - this is an encyclopedia; all bona fide information is appropriate, and the proper threshold for "notability" is "does it exist?". This topic meets both these criteria; therefore, it belongs here. Kurt Weber 15:41, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. "Does it exist?" I'd say no. Unverifiable, probable hoax/joke article. android79 15:49, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- It certainly does exist...all that has to be true for a theory to exist is for it to be stated somewhere--and it is at Escalator Productivity. Kurt Weber 16:26, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  - If this "scientific theory" exists only on Wikipedia, then it is original research and should be deleted. android79 18:16, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    - That it is "original research" is not a valid reason for deletion. The policy may claim otherwise, but the policy is wrong. Kurt Weber 20:27, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - probable hoax; no Google hits JoJan 15:56, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Nothing on google/ content doesn't make sense; This is probably a made up vanity page by the contributer (who also tried to add to Pace University and Trey Thomspon). --Howrealisreal 16:09, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per WP:NOT wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Including any theory ever invented by anyone is indiscriminate. Kappa 16:46, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Well put, Kappa. / Peter ^Isotalo 16:56, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. TheMadBaron 17:06, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per Kappa. --Andy Janata 17:43, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per Kappa. Thue | talk 18:12, 18 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 ** It certainly does exist...all that has to be true for a theory to exist is for it to be stated somewhere--and it is at [[Escalator Productivity]].  [[User:Kmweber|Kurt Weber]] 16:26, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 *** If this "scientific theory" exists only on Wikipedia, then it is [[WP:NOR|original research]] and should be deleted. <font color="green">[[User:Android79|android]]</font><font color="purple">[[User talk:Android79|79]]</font> 18:16, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
+**** That it is "original research" is not a valid reason for deletion.  The policy may claim otherwise, but the policy is wrong. [[User:Kmweber|Kurt Weber]] 20:27, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' - probable hoax; no Google hits [[User:JoJan|JoJan]] 15:56, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' - Nothing on google/ content doesn't make sense; This is probably a made up vanity page by the contributer (who also tried to add to [[Pace University]] and [[Trey Thomspon]]). --[[User:Howrealisreal|Howrealisreal]] 16:09, 18 September 2005 (UTC)