Jump to content

User talk:Ryulong: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted to revision 292583113 by Ryulong; quit gloating, it's incivil & borders on a personal attack.
DougsTech (talk | contribs)
Undid revision 292787915 by Versageek (talk) an admin is removed, it must be noted clearly that we are moving in the right dir..
Line 18: Line 18:


:Pity this had to happen as your contribution to the project are very extensive and your work in cleaning out vandals was impressive. Please use the time ahead to reflect and regain the communities trust - I think that would be to everybodies benefit. [[User:Agathoclea|Agathoclea]] ([[User talk:Agathoclea|talk]]) 21:45, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
:Pity this had to happen as your contribution to the project are very extensive and your work in cleaning out vandals was impressive. Please use the time ahead to reflect and regain the communities trust - I think that would be to everybodies benefit. [[User:Agathoclea|Agathoclea]] ([[User talk:Agathoclea|talk]]) 21:45, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

== Hooray! ==

A bad admin is desysopped! Hopefully this trend will continue until we can weed out all the malicious admins, then start promoting new users who will use the tools within policy. --[[User:DougsTech|DougsTech]] ([[User talk:DougsTech|talk]]) 00:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:01, 28 May 2009

My local time:
November 2024
Thursday
10:30 pm EST
Archives

When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives at my own discretion.—Ryūlóng



Ebi

Sorry, I looked it up here and it said shrimp, prawn and sniny lobster, which appears more similar to a shrimp to me... - Pokemega32 (talk) 01:45, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Check Decapoda and then look at its Japanese Wikipedia article.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

I know that I said I would help,

But I don't know if I can. I realize that they may be notable in their own way, and while I still do not think they deserve their own individual article, I don't think there is a way to group them together either. So I'm just going to leave them alone, because I don't know what to do.— dαlus Contribs 05:28, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Do what now?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 05:28, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. For misuse of his administrative tools, failure to address the community's concerns, and inappropriate off-wiki behavior, Ryulong (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) is desysopped. Mythdon (talk · contribs) is restricted and placed under mentorship for a period of 1 year. Mythdon is also admonished for their harassing behavior on and off-wiki and directed to refrain from contacting Ryulong off-wiki and seeking Ryulong's identity on and off-wiki. All participants of WikiProject Tokusatsu are advised to work on producing a genuine guideline for the articles falling under the scope of the WikiProject Tokusatsu. They are urged to work in collaboration with Mythdon while seeking outside advice and help. Other remedies also apply.

For the Arbitration Committee, KnightLago (talk) 20:31, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pity this had to happen as your contribution to the project are very extensive and your work in cleaning out vandals was impressive. Please use the time ahead to reflect and regain the communities trust - I think that would be to everybodies benefit. Agathoclea (talk) 21:45, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray!

A bad admin is desysopped! Hopefully this trend will continue until we can weed out all the malicious admins, then start promoting new users who will use the tools within policy. --DougsTech (talk) 00:51, 28 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]