Jump to content

User talk:ColonelS: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
ColonelS (talk | contribs)
Line 16: Line 16:


Oh, and Gamaliel - while you're at it, would you mind giving that same lecture about "civility" to [[user:Cberlet]], who ever-so-kindly responded to my changes to the article by accusing me of a "cheap fabrication" both in his note and his Edit Summaries [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AChip_Berlet&diff=40793224&oldid=40780352]. Do that and we'll see once and for all if you are REALLY interested in keeping things "civil and productive," or if you're just singling me out for being a Republican while letting all the lefties slide. -- Col.S
Oh, and Gamaliel - while you're at it, would you mind giving that same lecture about "civility" to [[user:Cberlet]], who ever-so-kindly responded to my changes to the article by accusing me of a "cheap fabrication" both in his note and his Edit Summaries [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AChip_Berlet&diff=40793224&oldid=40780352]. Do that and we'll see once and for all if you are REALLY interested in keeping things "civil and productive," or if you're just singling me out for being a Republican while letting all the lefties slide. -- Col.S

I'm singling you out because you are the person who accused someone else of censorship in an edit summary that I noticed when I was monitoring recent changes today. I've been accused of both liberal and conservative bias so many times that your little taunts do nothing but make me yawn. I've tried to be polite about this, but since you are so determined to be the victim of political oppression, tell you what, next time you accuse anyone of censorship I will block you for incivility and disruption. Learn to play nice with others or I won't play nice with you. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 22:36, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:36, 23 February 2006

Welcome

Edit summaries

Please do not use edit summaries to accuse other editors of censorship. Keep your comments civil and productive. See Wikipedia:Civility. Gamaliel 22:01, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then tell your buddies not to censor out facts to cover the rear ends of their liberal friends.

Editing Wikipedia articles is a collaborative process, not a combative one. There is no reason for this to be adversarial. You can be a strong advocate for your case without resorting to such accusations. Gamaliel 22:13, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And I'm sure you're going to lecture the guy over at the National Lawyers Guild article who just wiped it clean and said "to keep the far-right Horowitz nuts from rewriting history." [1] Let's see how consistent you are there. -- ColonelS

I cannot personally monitor the actions of every user on every article and I see no need to rush over to some random article to prove something to you. Your actions are not dependent upon what other people do, you are the one responsible for them. Gamaliel 22:24, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So in other words you're passing the buck and making excuses for singling me out to a standard that you don't hold others to. It was a simple task, Gamaliel. It only involved one user on one article -- not a request to monitor "every user" on "every article." And the guy you just gave a pass to happens to be a liberal. Why am I not surprised? -- ColonelS

Oh, and Gamaliel - while you're at it, would you mind giving that same lecture about "civility" to user:Cberlet, who ever-so-kindly responded to my changes to the article by accusing me of a "cheap fabrication" both in his note and his Edit Summaries [2]. Do that and we'll see once and for all if you are REALLY interested in keeping things "civil and productive," or if you're just singling me out for being a Republican while letting all the lefties slide. -- Col.S

I'm singling you out because you are the person who accused someone else of censorship in an edit summary that I noticed when I was monitoring recent changes today. I've been accused of both liberal and conservative bias so many times that your little taunts do nothing but make me yawn. I've tried to be polite about this, but since you are so determined to be the victim of political oppression, tell you what, next time you accuse anyone of censorship I will block you for incivility and disruption. Learn to play nice with others or I won't play nice with you. Gamaliel 22:36, 23 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]