User talk:69.2.120.20: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Hello. I reverted your addition to [[hack writer]] because (1) it was completely redundant, and (2) it was not a complete or grammatical sentence, and (3) it really wasn't in the appropriate part of the article. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 21:42, 10 August 2005 (UTC) |
Hello. I reverted your addition to [[hack writer]] because (1) it was completely redundant, and (2) it was not a complete or grammatical sentence, and (3) it really wasn't in the appropriate part of the article. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 21:42, 10 August 2005 (UTC) |
||
==Your edits at [[Photoblog]]== |
|||
Hello. This is in reference to your latest edit summary at [[Photoblog]], "Everone has a right to edit. You can delete and I can add. It our right. I bet you don't even have anything to do with the photobloging community." It shows misunderstandings of how Wikipedia works and what its policies are. In the first place, having something to do with the photoblogging community isn't a prerequisite for editing the article, quite the contrary; it's preferable to stick to editing articles that you're ''not'' personally involved in. If adding your own blog is what you're interested in, go to some site that exists for the purpose; [[WP:NOT|Wikipedia is not]] a link repository. Edits are supposed to be done for the purpose of improving the article, not for serving your own interest. Secondly, you don't have any rights here, and I don't either. Editing is a privilege, not a right: it can and will be withdrawn if you don't edit collaboratively. You are currently doing the opposite, you're disrupting the article by [[Wikipedia:edit warring]]. Please stop, or I will block you, and any IP you choose to come in from. Please click on the blue links in this message to learn more about Wikipedia's policies. [[User:Bishonen|Bishonen]] | [[User talk:Bishonen|ノート]] 17:05, 17 March 2006 (UTC). |
|||
Revision as of 17:05, 17 March 2006
Hello. I reverted your addition to hack writer because (1) it was completely redundant, and (2) it was not a complete or grammatical sentence, and (3) it really wasn't in the appropriate part of the article. Michael Hardy 21:42, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
Your edits at Photoblog
Hello. This is in reference to your latest edit summary at Photoblog, "Everone has a right to edit. You can delete and I can add. It our right. I bet you don't even have anything to do with the photobloging community." It shows misunderstandings of how Wikipedia works and what its policies are. In the first place, having something to do with the photoblogging community isn't a prerequisite for editing the article, quite the contrary; it's preferable to stick to editing articles that you're not personally involved in. If adding your own blog is what you're interested in, go to some site that exists for the purpose; Wikipedia is not a link repository. Edits are supposed to be done for the purpose of improving the article, not for serving your own interest. Secondly, you don't have any rights here, and I don't either. Editing is a privilege, not a right: it can and will be withdrawn if you don't edit collaboratively. You are currently doing the opposite, you're disrupting the article by Wikipedia:edit warring. Please stop, or I will block you, and any IP you choose to come in from. Please click on the blue links in this message to learn more about Wikipedia's policies. Bishonen | ノート 17:05, 17 March 2006 (UTC).