Jump to content

Fief: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m
Expanded intro to include Book of Fees
(29 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
::''For other uses see [[Fee (disambiguation)]]''
::''For other uses see [[Fee (disambiguation)]]''
{{English Feudalism}}
{{English Feudalism}}
A '''fee''' (Latin: ''feudum''; French: ''Seigneurie'') was the central element of [[feudalism]] and consisted of [[inheritance|heritable]] property or rights granted by an [[Lord|overlord]] to a [[vassal]] who held it in [[fealty]] (or "in fee") in return for a form of feudal allegiance and service, usually given by the personal ceremonies of [[Homage (medieval)|homage]] and [[fealty]]. The fees were often lands or revenue-producing real property held in [[Feudal land tenure|feudal tenure]]: these are typically known as '''fiefs''' or '''fiefdoms'''. A list of several hundred such fees held [[tenant-in-chief|in chief]] between 1198 and 1292, along with their holders' names and form of tenure, was published in three volumes between 1920 and 1931 and is known as ''[[Book of Fees|The Book of Fees]]''; it was developed from the 1302 ''[[Testa de Nevill]]''. However, not only land but anything of value could be held in fee, including governmental office, rights of exploitation such as hunting or fishing, monopolies in trade, and [[Tax farm#Feudal England|tax farm]]s. The privilege of minting official coins developed into the concept of [[seigniorage]].
A '''fee''' (alternatively & rarely: '''fief''', '''fiefdom''',<ref>The term "fee" is that invariably used in modern & victorian academic literature on the history of the feudal era, i.e. "Book of Fees" etc.; "fief", whilst etymologically correct and useful for demonstrating the etymology, is largely restricted in use to popular and often uninformed speech</ref> [[Latinised]] to ''feudum'') was the central element of [[feudalism]] and consisted of [[inheritance|heritable]] lands (or revenue-producing property) granted under one of several varieties of [[Feudal land tenure|feudal tenure]] by an [[overlord]] to a [[vassal]] who held it in [[fealty]] (or "in fee") in return for a form of feudal allegiance and service, usually given by the personal ceremonies of [[Homage (medieval)|homage]] and [[fealty]]. A list of several hundred such fees held [[tenant-in-chief|in chief]] between 1198 and 1292, their holders' names and form of [[Feudal land tenure|tenure]] was published in 3 volumes between 1920-31, known as "[[Book of Fees|The Book of Fees]]", and is a re-edition of a mediaeval precursor known as the ''Testa de Nevill'', produced in 1302. Not only land but anything of value could be held in fee, such as an office, a right of exploitation (e.g., hunting, fishing) or any other type of right to receive revenue such as a [[Farm (revenue commutation)|fee farm]], rather than the land it comes from.


In the 10th and 11th centuries the term "fee" could be used either to describe dependent [[Land tenure|tenure]] held by a man from his lord, as the term is used now by historians, or it could mean simply "property". It lacked a precise meaning until the middle of the 12th century, when it received formal definition from land lawyers. The [[manor]] was, in effect, a small fief.
In the 10th and 11th centuries the term "fee" (feudum) could be used either to describe dependent [[Land tenure|tenure]] held by a man from his lord, as the term is used now by historians, or it could mean simply "property". It lacked a precise meaning until the middle of the 12th century, when it received formal definition from land lawyers.


Historically the fees of the 11th and the 12th century derived from two separate sources. The first was land carved out of the estates of the upper nobility. The second source was [[allod]]ial land transformed into dependent tenures. During the 10th century in northern France and the 11th century in France south of the [[Loire]], local magnates either recruited or forced the owners of allodial holdings into dependent relationships and they were turned into fiefs. The process occurred later in Germany, and was still going on in the 13th century.
Historically the fees of the 11th and the 12th century derived from two separate sources. The first was land carved out of the estates of the upper nobility. The second source was [[allod]]ial land transformed into dependent tenures. During the 10th century in northern France and the 11th century in France south of the [[Loire]], local magnates either recruited or forced the owners of allodial holdings into dependent relationships and they were turned into fiefs. The process occurred later in Germany, and was still going on in the 13th century.
Line 11: Line 11:


However, knight service in war was far less common than:
However, knight service in war was far less common than:
*castle-guard (called ''[[Burghut]]'' in the Holy Roman Empire) the obligation of a vassal to serve in a [[castle]] [[garrison]] of the lord),
*castle-guard (the obligation of a vassal to serve in a [[castle]] [[garrison]] of the lord),
*suit in court (the vassal's obligation to attend the lord's [[Court (royal)|court]], to give him counsel, and to help him judge disputes)
*suit in court (the vassal's obligation to attend the lord's [[Court (royal)|court]], to give him counsel, and to help him judge disputes)
*attendance in the lord's entourage (accompanying the lord when he travelled or attended the court of his lord so as to increase the social status of the lord),
*attendance in the lord's entourage (accompanying the lord when he travelled or attended the court of his lord so as to increase the social status of the lord),
*hospitality to the lord or to his servants (accommodation).
*hospitality to the lord or to his servants (accommodation).


[[File:Sigismund fees the land Brandenburg to Frederik, April 30, 1415.jpg|thumb|[[Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor|Sigismund]] fees the [[Margraviate of Brandenburg]] to [[Frederick I, Elector of Brandenburg|Frederik]], April 30, 1415]]
A lord in late 12th-century England and France could also claim the right of:
A lord in late 12th-century England and France could also claim the right of:
*wardship and marriage - right to control descent of fee by choosing husband for female heir and guardian of minors (preferably in consultation with heir's closest male adult kinsmen);
*wardship and marriage - right to control descent of fee by choosing husband for female heir and guardian of minors (preferably in consultation with heir's closest male adult kinsmen);
*"aids" - payments to aid the lord in times of need (customarily given to the lord to cover the cost of knighting of eldest son, marriage of eldest daughter, and for [[ransom]]ing of lord if required);
*"aids" - payments to aid the lord in times of need (customarily given to the lord to cover the cost of knighting of eldest son, marriage of eldest daughter, and for [[ransom]]ing of lord if required);
*[[escheat]] - the reversion of the fief to the lord in default of an heir.<ref name=abels>{{cite web |url=http://www.usna.edu/Users/history/abels/hh315/Feudal.htm |title=Feudalism |first=Richard |last=Abels |publisher=United States Naval Academy}}</ref>
*[[escheat]] - the reversion of the fief to the lord in default of an heir.<ref>[http://www.usna.edu/Users/history/abels/hh315/Feudal.htm Richard Abels "Feudalism"]</ref>


Originally, [[vassal]]age did not imply the giving or receiving of landholdings (which were granted only as a reward for loyalty), but by the eighth century the giving of a landholding was becoming standard. The granting of a landholding to a vassal did not relinquish the lord's property rights, but only the use of the lands and their income; the granting lord retained ultimate ownership of the fee and could, technically, recover the lands in case of disloyalty or death.<ref>Cantor (1993), pp. 198-199.</ref>
Originally, [[vassal]]age did not imply the giving or receiving of landholdings (which were granted only as a reward for loyalty), but by the eighth century the giving of a landholding was becoming standard. The granting of a landholding to a vassal did not relinquish the lord's property rights, but only the use of the lands and their income; the granting lord retained ultimate ownership of the fee and could, technically, recover the lands in case of disloyalty or death.<ref>Cantor, 198-9.</ref>


By the middle of the 10th century, fee had largely become hereditary.<ref name="Cantor, 200">Cantor (1993), p. 200.</ref> The eldest son of a deceased vassal would inherit, but first he had to do homage and fealty to the lord and pay a "[[feudal relief|relief]]" for the land (a monetary recognition of the lord's continuing proprietary rights over the property). [[Henry II of England|Henry II]] transformed them into important sources of royal income and patronage. The discontent of [[baron]]s with royal claims to arbitrarily assessed "reliefs" and other feudal payments under Henry's son [[John of England|King John]] resulted in [[Magna Carta]] of 1215.
By the middle of the 10th century, fee had largely become hereditary.<ref name="Cantor, 200">Cantor, 200.</ref> The eldest son of a deceased vassal would inherit, but first he had to do homage and fealty to the lord and pay a "[[relief]]" for the land (a monetary recognition of the lord's continuing proprietary rights over the property). [[Henry II of England|Henry II]] transformed them into important sources of royal income and patronage. The discontent of [[baron]]s with royal claims to arbitrarily assessed "reliefs" and other feudal payments under Henry's son [[John of England|King John]] resulted in [[Magna Carta]] of 1215.


Eventually, great feudal lords sought also to seize governmental and legal authority (the collection of taxes, the right of high justice, etc.) in their lands, and some passed these rights to their own vassals.<ref name="Cantor, 200"/>
Eventually, great feudal lords sought also to seize governmental and legal authority (the collection of taxes, the right of high justice, etc.) in their lands, and some passed these rights to their own vassals.<ref name="Cantor, 200"/>


In northern France in the 12th and 13th centuries military service for fiefs was limited for offensive campaigns to 40 days for a knight. By the 12th century English and French kings and barons began to commute military service for cash payments ([[scutage]]s), with which they could purchase the service of [[mercenaries]].<ref name=abels/>
In northern France in the 12th and 13th centuries military service for fiefs was limited for offensive campaigns to 40 days for a knight. By the 12th century English and French kings and barons began to commute military service for cash payments ([[scutage]]s), with which they could purchase the service of [[mercenaries]].<ref>[http://www.usna.edu/Users/history/abels/hh315/Feudal.htm Richard Abels "Feudalism"]</ref>

==See also==
==See also==
*[[Book of Fees]]
{{multicol}}
*[[Knight's fee]]
* [[Appanage]], part of the liege's domain granted to a junior relative
*[[Fee simple]]
* ''[[Book of Fees]]'', a scholarly collection of fiefs
* [[Enfeoffment]]
*[[Fee tail]]
* [[Fee simple]]
*[[Enfeoffment]]
* [[Fee tail]]
*[[Feoffee]]
*[[Subinfeudation]]
* [[Fengjian]], the Chinese system often compared to European feudalism
*[[Appanage]] (consisting in part of the liege's domain, granted to a junior relative)
* [[Feoffee]]
* [[Herrschaft (territory)|Herrschaft]], the German equivalent
*[[Herrschaft (territory)|Herrschaft]]
*[[Knight-service]]
{{multicol-break}}
* [[Knight-service]]
*[[Urbarium]]

* [[Knight's fee]]
==Notes==
* [[Lord of the manor]]
{{Reflist}}
* [[Seigneurial system of New France]], a semifeudal system in France's American colonies
* [[Subinfeudation]]
* [[Urbarium]], a medieval record of fees
{{multicol-end}}


==References==
==References==
{{Wikisource1911Enc|Fief}}
{{Wikisource1911Enc|Fief}}
*[[Norman F. Cantor]]. ''The Civilization of the Middle Ages''. New York: HarperPerennial, 1993. ISBN 0-06-092553-1
*[[Norman F. Cantor]]. ''The Civilization of the Middle Ages''. New York: HarperPerennial, 1993. ISBN 0-06-092553-1

==Notes==
{{Reflist}}


[[Category:Feudalism]]
[[Category:Feudalism]]
[[Category:Real property law]]
[[Category:Real property law]]

[[ast:Feudu]]
[[be:Феод]]
[[be-x-old:Фэод]]
[[bg:Феод]]
[[ca:Feu]]
[[cs:Léno]]
[[da:Len]]
[[de:Lehnswesen]]
[[et:Lään]]
[[es:Feudo]]
[[eo:Feŭdo]]
[[fr:Fief]]
[[hr:Feud]]
[[io:Feudo]]
[[is:Lén]]
[[it:Feudo]]
[[he:פייף]]
[[lv:Lēnis]]
[[lt:Feodas]]
[[li:Hieëredeenste]]
[[nl:Leenstelsel]]
[[nds-nl:Liefeigenschop]]
[[ja:レーエン]]
[[no:Len]]
[[nn:Len]]
[[nrm:Fieu]]
[[oc:Fèu]]
[[pl:Lenno]]
[[pt:Feudo]]
[[ru:Феод]]
[[scn:Feu]]
[[simple:Fiefdom]]
[[sk:Léno]]
[[fi:Lahjoitusmaa]]
[[sv:Förläning]]
[[uk:Лен (феод)]]
[[wa:Fî]]
[[zh:采邑制]]

Revision as of 17:49, 18 September 2011

For other uses see Fee (disambiguation)

A fee (alternatively & rarely: fief, fiefdom,[1] Latinised to feudum) was the central element of feudalism and consisted of heritable lands (or revenue-producing property) granted under one of several varieties of feudal tenure by an overlord to a vassal who held it in fealty (or "in fee") in return for a form of feudal allegiance and service, usually given by the personal ceremonies of homage and fealty. A list of several hundred such fees held in chief between 1198 and 1292, their holders' names and form of tenure was published in 3 volumes between 1920-31, known as "The Book of Fees", and is a re-edition of a mediaeval precursor known as the Testa de Nevill, produced in 1302. Not only land but anything of value could be held in fee, such as an office, a right of exploitation (e.g., hunting, fishing) or any other type of right to receive revenue such as a fee farm, rather than the land it comes from.

In the 10th and 11th centuries the term "fee" (feudum) could be used either to describe dependent tenure held by a man from his lord, as the term is used now by historians, or it could mean simply "property". It lacked a precise meaning until the middle of the 12th century, when it received formal definition from land lawyers.

Historically the fees of the 11th and the 12th century derived from two separate sources. The first was land carved out of the estates of the upper nobility. The second source was allodial land transformed into dependent tenures. During the 10th century in northern France and the 11th century in France south of the Loire, local magnates either recruited or forced the owners of allodial holdings into dependent relationships and they were turned into fiefs. The process occurred later in Germany, and was still going on in the 13th century.

In 13th-century England, France, Germany, Spain, and Italy the term "feodum" was used to describe a dependent tenure held from a lord by a vassal in return for a specified amount of knight service and occasional financial payments (feudal incidents).

However, knight service in war was far less common than:

  • castle-guard (the obligation of a vassal to serve in a castle garrison of the lord),
  • suit in court (the vassal's obligation to attend the lord's court, to give him counsel, and to help him judge disputes)
  • attendance in the lord's entourage (accompanying the lord when he travelled or attended the court of his lord so as to increase the social status of the lord),
  • hospitality to the lord or to his servants (accommodation).

A lord in late 12th-century England and France could also claim the right of:

  • wardship and marriage - right to control descent of fee by choosing husband for female heir and guardian of minors (preferably in consultation with heir's closest male adult kinsmen);
  • "aids" - payments to aid the lord in times of need (customarily given to the lord to cover the cost of knighting of eldest son, marriage of eldest daughter, and for ransoming of lord if required);
  • escheat - the reversion of the fief to the lord in default of an heir.[2]

Originally, vassalage did not imply the giving or receiving of landholdings (which were granted only as a reward for loyalty), but by the eighth century the giving of a landholding was becoming standard. The granting of a landholding to a vassal did not relinquish the lord's property rights, but only the use of the lands and their income; the granting lord retained ultimate ownership of the fee and could, technically, recover the lands in case of disloyalty or death.[3]

By the middle of the 10th century, fee had largely become hereditary.[4] The eldest son of a deceased vassal would inherit, but first he had to do homage and fealty to the lord and pay a "relief" for the land (a monetary recognition of the lord's continuing proprietary rights over the property). Henry II transformed them into important sources of royal income and patronage. The discontent of barons with royal claims to arbitrarily assessed "reliefs" and other feudal payments under Henry's son King John resulted in Magna Carta of 1215.

Eventually, great feudal lords sought also to seize governmental and legal authority (the collection of taxes, the right of high justice, etc.) in their lands, and some passed these rights to their own vassals.[4]

In northern France in the 12th and 13th centuries military service for fiefs was limited for offensive campaigns to 40 days for a knight. By the 12th century English and French kings and barons began to commute military service for cash payments (scutages), with which they could purchase the service of mercenaries.[5]

See also

Notes

  1. ^ The term "fee" is that invariably used in modern & victorian academic literature on the history of the feudal era, i.e. "Book of Fees" etc.; "fief", whilst etymologically correct and useful for demonstrating the etymology, is largely restricted in use to popular and often uninformed speech
  2. ^ Richard Abels "Feudalism"
  3. ^ Cantor, 198-9.
  4. ^ a b Cantor, 200.
  5. ^ Richard Abels "Feudalism"

References

  • Norman F. Cantor. The Civilization of the Middle Ages. New York: HarperPerennial, 1993. ISBN 0-06-092553-1