Template:Did you know nominations/Stoner Site: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No significant recent research |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
* The source dates to 1976. Do we have a more recent citation to support it still having this status 30+ years later? --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 13:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC) |
* The source dates to 1976. Do we have a more recent citation to support it still having this status 30+ years later? --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 13:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC) |
||
**What status? I'm not making any claims about the present. Moreover, what I'm reading in Muller makes me think that there's been no significant research at Allison-Lamotte sites in recent years; the only site that seems to be cited more often is Daugherty-Monroe, and that's in Indiana. [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 13:22, 18 July 2012 (UTC) |
**What status? I'm not making any claims about the present. Moreover, what I'm reading in Muller makes me think that there's been no significant research at Allison-Lamotte sites in recent years; the only site that seems to be cited more often is Daugherty-Monroe, and that's in Indiana. [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 13:22, 18 July 2012 (UTC) |
||
***The use of the perfect tense does indeed commonly make a claim about the present; cf. "was once the"; also, does "cultural purity" sound a little like a product of the [[Ahnenerbe]]? [[User:Maculosae tegmine lyncis|Maculosae tegmine lyncis]] ([[User talk:Maculosae tegmine lyncis|talk]]) 14:59, 18 July 2012 (UTC) |
|||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
||
Revision as of 14:59, 18 July 2012
Stoner Site
- ... that the Stoner Site has been named Illinois' purest Allison-Lamotte archaeological site?
- Reviewed: Gradislav Vojšić
- Comment: See the Stoner talk page for my explanation of an oddity in the text. By my count, Stoner is expanded approximately 15.5x, going from 449 characters to 7030, while Allison-Lamotte is a new creation approximately 3000 characters in length.Created/expanded by Nyttend (talk). Self nom at 04:46, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Both articles are new enough and long enough (expansion/newly created). One QPQ done. Two preferred but not going to dicker around on this tonight. Both articles have images, each with an acceptable copyright tag. Hook is properly formatted. Hooked fact is found in Stoner Site when it says "the Illinois Archaeological Survey deemed it the state's purest example of the culture".
Offline materials were not plagiarised and support cited text.- The source dates to 1976. Do we have a more recent citation to support it still having this status 30+ years later? --LauraHale (talk) 13:05, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- What status? I'm not making any claims about the present. Moreover, what I'm reading in Muller makes me think that there's been no significant research at Allison-Lamotte sites in recent years; the only site that seems to be cited more often is Daugherty-Monroe, and that's in Indiana. Nyttend (talk) 13:22, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- The use of the perfect tense does indeed commonly make a claim about the present; cf. "was once the"; also, does "cultural purity" sound a little like a product of the Ahnenerbe? Maculosae tegmine lyncis (talk) 14:59, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- What status? I'm not making any claims about the present. Moreover, what I'm reading in Muller makes me think that there's been no significant research at Allison-Lamotte sites in recent years; the only site that seems to be cited more often is Daugherty-Monroe, and that's in Indiana. Nyttend (talk) 13:22, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
