Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kritarchy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Unquietwiki (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
'''Keep''' and clean up. [[User:Lemonsawdust|Lemonsawdust]] 08:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC) |
'''Keep''' and clean up. [[User:Lemonsawdust|Lemonsawdust]] 08:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC) |
||
'''Keep''' [[User:max rspct]] has been trying to get a number of political articles and templates deleted lately. [[User:Cwolfsheep|Cwolfsheep]] 13:39, 25 June 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:39, 25 June 2006
not notable, unsourced bar forum and personal essay. Possible result of trolling organisation activity max rspct leave a message 18:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep - The term is used in anthropology, in reference to many traditional cultures including biblical ones, on up to the Xeer in Somalia today. It is also used in political science.WickedWanda 19:17, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
- comment: Where sources mr hogeye's sockpuppet? -- maxrspct leave a message 21:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep - needs to be cleaned up and more closely sourced but encyclopaedic and should stay. TerriersFan 19:30, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep The User:max rspct has been perpetuating edit wars over at Anarchism and has quite of history of push POV all over the political spectrum. Two-Bit Sprite 19:47, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Strong keep. It's difficult to imagine why this was even nominated. (That said, it does need categorization.) --The Editrix 20:09, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep - just looking at Google results for "kritarchy" [1] (of which there are 48,400) one can see its use in wide variety of sources. So the term clearly deserves its own article. Hence, I'd say the article needs work, not deletion. ikh (talk) 01:37, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per above. —Quarl (talk) 2006-06-22 08:27Z
Keep and clean up. Lemonsawdust 08:13, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
Keep User:max rspct has been trying to get a number of political articles and templates deleted lately. Cwolfsheep 13:39, 25 June 2006 (UTC)