User talk:ER MD: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:50, 3 July 2006

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. The edit I refer to is here. IrishGuy ^talk 04:07, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages or sections with blank content. It is considered vandalism. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Also, please do not remove warnings from your talk page. That, too, goes against policy. IrishGuy ^talk 18:17, 2 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removing warnings

Don't do it. Simple as that. 69.145.123.171 ^Hello! Monday, July 3, 2006, 08:11 (UTC)

3RR

Doesn't apply when one is dealing with vandalism. 69.145.123.171 ^Hello! Monday, July 3, 2006, 08:21 (UTC)

No, I'm not. And I've added you to the Administrator's Noticeboard for your behavior. --69.145.123.171 08:23, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again. Tito xd^(?!?) 08:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And by the way, editing without registering and editing other's pages is not against policy. --69.145.123.171 08:24, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are an idiot. I am trying to remove DUMB comments by uninformed people, probably teenagers with their stupdi comments. Why the hell do you even care? I got a fucking violation for trying to clean up the shit on this page by morons. ER MD 08:27, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warnings aren't "dumb comments". And little notes like these^[1] and what you wrote up above will got you blocked.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Tito xd^(?!?) 08:28, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, how about this:

Instead of deleting the messages, make an archive of them. Otherwise, they have to stay on this page. --69.145.123.171 18:15, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing on this page worth archiving. Its all junk. ER MD 19:56, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, but everytime you remove it somebody else will put it back. That's the way it works. 69.145.123.171 ^Hello! Monday, July 3, 2006, 20:06 (UTC)

according to the talk page: "Others delete comments after they have responded to them." I've responded to the comments and I have opted to delete them. My warning is on deleting entries that have no value. And my block was for deleting unimportant stuff and getting pissed off at people for puting false information on the talk page. ER MD 20:22, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No, you're deleting warnings. They had merit and have to stay. 69.145.123.171 ^Hello! Monday, July 3, 2006, 20:37 (UTC)

I am editing pages. People who disagree can't simply claim vandalism--just like the way I made false claims on your talk page--is it fair that you keep it there? and other people think that you are a vandal? I've written most of lethal injection, shock and awe, a good part of american conservatism, the opinion section on capital punishment(got in a heated debate there and nrcprm2026 was eventually banned from editing), topics on etomidate, valium, pentothal, pentobarbiturate, neuromuscular blockers. Anybody can claim vandalism and throw a claim onto my talk page. They are bogus warnings. The deletion for reaganomics--there is simply an edit war since its all pov there. I probably won't be wasting my time there. Again, all of this stuff is worthless. Don't you have something better to do than police a person's talkpage. I only want it cleaned up and I'm not that good at wiki to figure out how to do an archive... ER MD 20:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 20:37, 3 July 2006 edit 69.145.123.171 (talk) reply ← Previous edit		Revision as of 20:50, 3 July 2006 edit undo ER MD (talk \| contribs) 872 edits →‎Okay, how about this: Next edit →
Line 32:		Line 32:

	:::::No, you're deleting warnings. They had merit and have to stay. <b>[[User:69.145.123.171\|<font style="background:#488AC7" color="white"> 69.145.123.171</font>]] <small><sup> [[User_talk:69.145.123.171\|<font style=color="#151B8D">Hello!</font>]]</sup></small></b> <font color="blue"> Monday, July 3, 2006, 20:37 ([[UTC]]) </font>		:::::No, you're deleting warnings. They had merit and have to stay. <b>[[User:69.145.123.171\|<font style="background:#488AC7" color="white"> 69.145.123.171</font>]] <small><sup> [[User_talk:69.145.123.171\|<font style=color="#151B8D">Hello!</font>]]</sup></small></b> <font color="blue"> Monday, July 3, 2006, 20:37 ([[UTC]]) </font>

			::::::I am editing pages. People who disagree can't simply claim vandalism--just like the way I made false claims on your talk page--is it fair that you keep it there? and other people think that you are a vandal? I've written most of lethal injection, shock and awe, a good part of american conservatism, the opinion section on capital punishment(got in a heated debate there and nrcprm2026 was eventually banned from editing), topics on etomidate, valium, pentothal, pentobarbiturate, neuromuscular blockers. Anybody can claim vandalism and throw a claim onto my talk page. They are bogus warnings. The deletion for reaganomics--there is simply an edit war since its all pov there. I probably won't be wasting my time there. Again, all of this stuff is worthless. Don't you have something better to do than police a person's talkpage. I only want it cleaned up and I'm not that good at wiki to figure out how to do an archive... [[User:ER MD\|ER MD]] 20:50, 3 July 2006 (UTC)