Jump to content

Draft:Gamergate (harassment campaign): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Trim cunts from quote. Calling women "uppity cunts" does not help and is not one if the reasons the quote is illustrating. ps Why is the talk page protected? I tried to talk about this change but was not allowed.
Undid revision 638037417 by 178.78.100.201 (talk) the focus on denigration of women is primary aspect of gg
Line 133: Line 133:
===Role of misogyny and antifeminism===
===Role of misogyny and antifeminism===
{{see also|Sexism in video gaming}}
{{see also|Sexism in video gaming}}
A number of commentators have argued that the GamerGate hashtag had the potential to raise important issues in gaming journalism, but that the wave of misogynistic harassment and abuse associated with the hashtag had [[poisoned the well]], making it impossible to separate honest criticism from sexist trolling.<ref name=Vox /><ref name=WaPo /><ref name=goldman /> The hashtag has also been associated with criticism of feminism and so called "Social Justice Warriors." According to Sarah Kaplan of ''The Washington Post'', "sexism in gaming is a long-documented, much-debated but seemingly intractable problem," and became the crux of the GamerGate controversy.<ref name=WaPo /> Writing in ''[[The Week]]'', Ryan Cooper called the harassment campaign "an online form of terrorism" intended to reverse a trend in gaming culture toward increasing acceptance of women, and stated that social media platforms need to tighten their policies and protections against threats and abuse.<ref name=TheWeek /> Speaking on [[Iowa Public Radio]], academic Cindy Tekobbe said the harassment campaign was intended to "drive women out of public spaces" and intimidate them into silence.<ref name=IPR /> The feminist journalist and author [[Laurie Penny]] characterized the reasons for the ferocity of the reaction against the shift in gaming culture thus: "The problem is that women are creating culture, changing culture, redefining culture.<ref name=boingsjw />
A number of commentators have argued that the GamerGate hashtag had the potential to raise important issues in gaming journalism, but that the wave of misogynistic harassment and abuse associated with the hashtag had [[poisoned the well]], making it impossible to separate honest criticism from sexist trolling.<ref name=Vox /><ref name=WaPo /><ref name=goldman /> The hashtag has also been associated with criticism of feminism and so called "Social Justice Warriors." According to Sarah Kaplan of ''The Washington Post'', "sexism in gaming is a long-documented, much-debated but seemingly intractable problem," and became the crux of the GamerGate controversy.<ref name=WaPo /> Writing in ''[[The Week]]'', Ryan Cooper called the harassment campaign "an online form of terrorism" intended to reverse a trend in gaming culture toward increasing acceptance of women, and stated that social media platforms need to tighten their policies and protections against threats and abuse.<ref name=TheWeek /> Speaking on [[Iowa Public Radio]], academic Cindy Tekobbe said the harassment campaign was intended to "drive women out of public spaces" and intimidate them into silence.<ref name=IPR /> The feminist journalist and author [[Laurie Penny]] characterized the reasons for the ferocity of the reaction against the shift in gaming culture thus: "The problem is that women are creating culture, changing culture, redefining culture, and those cunts, those poisonous cunts, those disgusting, uppity cunts must be stopped."<ref name=boingsjw />


Issues like sexism and misogyny had been identified as problems in the video game industry and community prior to the events of Gamergate.<ref name="gdc misogyny 2012"/> Wu stated in a November 2014 interview with ''[[Develop (magazine)|Develop]]'' that the game industry "has been a boys’ club for 30 years", describing that the common portrayal of women as "sex symbols and damsels in distress" in video games has led to the players taking the same attitudes.<ref name="develop harassment"/> In March 2014, game designer [[Cliff Bleszinski]] wrote a blog post commenting on the "latent racism, homophobia and misogyny" that existed within the online gaming community.<ref name="NYTSuellentrop"/> It is believed this itself is tied to the anonymous, male-dominated nature of the Internet; Astra Taylor of ''[[Mother Jones (magazine)|Mother Jones]]'' documented harassment against women from online communities in April 2014, in which the harassment was played off by the male posters as if it was just "harmless locker room talk".<ref name="mj april2014"/> Developer [[Peter Molyneux]] considered that the Internet's instant accessibility of social media allows for people to express of-the-moment opinions without thinking about their consequences, leading to a "whole Pandora’s Box" of both good and bad issues that society must consider in terms of freedom of speech.<ref name="develop harassment"/>
Issues like sexism and misogyny had been identified as problems in the video game industry and community prior to the events of Gamergate.<ref name="gdc misogyny 2012"/> Wu stated in a November 2014 interview with ''[[Develop (magazine)|Develop]]'' that the game industry "has been a boys’ club for 30 years", describing that the common portrayal of women as "sex symbols and damsels in distress" in video games has led to the players taking the same attitudes.<ref name="develop harassment"/> In March 2014, game designer [[Cliff Bleszinski]] wrote a blog post commenting on the "latent racism, homophobia and misogyny" that existed within the online gaming community.<ref name="NYTSuellentrop"/> It is believed this itself is tied to the anonymous, male-dominated nature of the Internet; Astra Taylor of ''[[Mother Jones (magazine)|Mother Jones]]'' documented harassment against women from online communities in April 2014, in which the harassment was played off by the male posters as if it was just "harmless locker room talk".<ref name="mj april2014"/> Developer [[Peter Molyneux]] considered that the Internet's instant accessibility of social media allows for people to express of-the-moment opinions without thinking about their consequences, leading to a "whole Pandora’s Box" of both good and bad issues that society must consider in terms of freedom of speech.<ref name="develop harassment"/>

Revision as of 14:31, 14 December 2014

"GamerGate" redirects here. For the type of ant, see Gamergate. For the online video game store, see GamersGate.

The Gamergate controversy, centering on a debate about sexism in video game culture, came to public attention beginning in August 2014, because of ongoing harassment and threats, primarily targeting women in the video game industry. While many supporters of the self-described Gamergate movement say that they are concerned about ethical issues in video game journalism, the majority of commentators have focused on issues rooted in a culture war against women and the diversification of gaming culture. The attacks conducted under the #gamergate hashtag have been broadly condemned as sexist and misogynistic.

The controversy began after indie game developer Zoe Quinn's ex-boyfriend alleged that Quinn had a romantic relationship with Nathan Grayson, a journalist for the video game news site Kotaku. Quinn was then subjected to severe misogynistic harassment, including false accusations that the relationship had led to positive coverage of Quinn's game. A number of gaming industry members supportive of Quinn were also subjected to harassment, threats of violence, and the malicious broadcasting of personally identifiable information about them (doxing); some of them fled their homes. The targets were mostly women, and included Quinn, feminist media critic Anita Sarkeesian, and indie game developer Brianna Wu. The harassment came from social media users, particularly those from 4chan, 8chan and Reddit using the #gamergate hashtag. These attacks often include anti-feminist and misogynistic rhetoric, and have heightened discussion of sexism and misogyny in the gaming community.

Many involved with the Gamergate hashtag have said that they are concerned with ethics in video game journalism; members launched a campaign to convince ad providers to pull support from sites critical of Gamergate. This campaign and others like it have been widely criticized in the media as evidence that the ethics concerns are a front for a culture war against the diversification of video game demographics. The Gamergate group's origins in the false allegations and harassment of Quinn, its failure to identify significant ethical issues in games media, and its frequent criticism of game critics who discuss issues of gender, class, and politics in their reviews have also been cited as evidence for this position. The unorganized, leaderless movement has hitherto been unwilling or unable to distance itself from continued harassment.

The events of Gamergate are widely attributed to perceived changes or threats to the "gamer" identity as a result of the ongoing diversification and maturation of the gaming industry. As video games have become recognized as a popular art form, they have been subjected to social criticism and treated directly as a vehicle for such commentary. This move to recognize games as art is thought to have prompted opposition from traditional "hardcore" gamers who view games primarily as a form of entertainment. The resulting culture war led to the subsequent harassment and conflict.

History

The idea of a "gamer" identity emerged in the early years of the video game industry, and gained widespread recognition with the rise of the internet. As early gamers were predominantly male this contributed to gendered interpretations of the identity. The emergence of the industry also gave rise to numerous publications specializing in the coverage of video games and catering for the interests of this gamer audience. Such publications were seen by industry leaders as a means of promotion for their products rather than sources for honest critical discussion and there was recurring criticism of the close relationship between gaming journalists and major gaming companies.[1][2][3] The growing popularity of games among casual consumers, due to more accessible technologies such as the Nintendo Wii and smartphones, expanded the audience for the industry to include many who did not fit the mold of the traditional hardcore gamer. As games also came to be seen as an art form rather than a product, games which featured meaningful artistic and cultural themes grew in popularity. This increasing perception of games as art prompted gaming publications to move towards cultural criticism of the games. Independent video game development, which allows developers to release titles without publisher interference, has made these games more common.[1][4][5][6][7]

The growth of the gaming audience also brought in many female gamers, which resulted in a diversification of the male-oriented gamer identity, and who began to question some assumptions and tropes that were historically used by game developers. Critics became increasingly interested in discussing issues of gender representation and identity in video games.[1][5] One prominent feminist critic of the representation of women in gaming is Anita Sarkeesian, whose Tropes vs. Women in Video Games project is devoted to criticism of female stereotypes in games. Her initial Kickstarter to raise funds for the series and her subsequent videos have all been met with hostile commentary and harassment from some gamers, who view her discourse as threatening. Further incidents, such as those concerning Jennifer Hepler raised concerns about sexual harassment in video gaming.[1][5][8] Prior to August 2014, concerns about escalating harassment prompted the International Game Developers Association to provide support groups for harassed developers, and to begin discussions with the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation to help investigate online harassment of game developers.[8]

In February 2013, Zoe Quinn released her interactive fiction game Depression Quest. Though the game was met positively by critics, it generated a backlash from some gamers who believed that the game received an undue amount of attention in comparison to its quality. Quinn began to receive hate mail over the game upon its release, receiving enough harassment to cause her to change her phone number. By September 2014, Quinn had already endured eighteen months of harassment, which had created "an ambient hum of menace in her life, albeit one that she has mostly been able to ignore."[9][10]

False allegations against Quinn and subsequent harassment

Game developer Zoe Quinn was the original target of the harassment campaign.

Depression Quest was released through Steam in August 2014, which coincided with the suicide of actor Robin Williams. Quinn, who had received the notification of the release from Steam shortly after the news about Williams' death, decided to release the game free as a service to those who may be suffering from depression, the only revenue the game receives is "pay what you want" proceeds, part of which are donated to the National Suicide Prevention Lifeline.[10][11] She said she did not want to be seen as capitalizing on the public tragedy, and decided that instead she would promote the game some time later out of respect for Williams.[12][13][14] Nonetheless her timing was criticized.[10]

Shortly after the release, Quinn's former boyfriend Eron Gjoni wrote a blog post, described by The New York Times as a "strange, rambling attack",[15] containing a series of allegations, among which was that Quinn had an affair with Kotaku journalist Nathan Grayson.[16] This led to false allegations from Quinn's detractors that the relationship had resulted in Grayson publishing a positive review of Quinn's game, Depression Quest.[2][16][17][18][19][20][10] Kotaku's editor-in-chief Stephen Totilo affirmed the existence of a relationship, but clarified that Grayson had not written anything about Quinn after the relationship had commenced and had never reviewed her games, but did acknowledge a piece written before the two began their relationship.[17][21] A number of commentators in and outside the gaming industry denounced the attack on Quinn as misogynistic and unfounded.[9][22][23]

"Next time she shows up at a conference we ... give her a crippling injury that's never going to fully heal ... a good solid injury to the knees. I'd say a brain damage, but we don't want to make it so she ends up too retarded to fear us."

A threat issued to Zoe Quinn, as reported by The New Yorker.[10]

As a result of these allegations, Quinn and her family were subjected to what The Washington Post called a "virulent" harassment campaign[9][16][22] including doxxing, threats of rape, hacks of her Tumblr, Dropbox, and Skype accounts,[24] and death threats. She began staying with friends out of fear that she would be tracked to her home.[10][16][25] Quinn told the BBC, "Before (GamerGate) had a name, it was nothing but trying to get me to kill myself, trying to get others to hurt me, going after my family. There is no mention of ethics in journalism at all outside making the same accusation everyone makes of successful women; that clearly she got to where she is because she had sex with someone."[26] Quinn told The New Yorker that she feels sympathy for her attackers because they have "deep-seeded loathing in themselves."[10] In an interview with MSNBC's Ronan Farrow Daily, she said she regards her GamerGate detractors as becoming increasingly irrelevant in the industry due to the democratization of game-making tools,[27] but nonetheless noted later in an interview with the BBC that, "I used to go to games [sic] events and feel like I was going home... Now it's just like... are any of the people I'm currently in the room with ones that said they wanted to beat me to death?"[26]

Feminist cultural critic Anita Sarkeesian faced death threats after releasing a new Tropes vs. Women in Video Games video.

The harassment expanded to include renewed threats against Anita Sarkeesian, after a new episode in her series ("Women as Background, Pt. 2") was released shortly thereafter. Sarkeesian received death threats, including her home address,[28] that compelled her to temporarily leave her home.[29][30][31][32] At the XOXO Festival in Portland, Oregon, she said, in regard to the accusations that high-profile women were making up the threats against them, that "One of the most radical things you can do is to actually believe women when they talk about their experiences," and that "The perpetrators do not see themselves as perpetrators at all... They see themselves as noble warriors."[33]

Others were targeted by similar harassment, doxxing, and death threats under the GamerGate umbrella. Those who came to Quinn's defense were targeted and labeled by their opponents with the "insulting"[34] phrase "social justice warriors" or "SJW" for short. Among those so described was fellow video game developer Phil Fish, who had been a focus of controversy on social media in 2013.[35] Fish, reportedly known for his combative hostility on social media, was doxxed after speaking in support of Quinn, which included numerous denigrating tweets he made about her opponents.[36][37] Many of his personal details were released[38] and documents relating to his company Polytron exposed in a hack that led him to sell Polytron and leave the gaming industry.[39][24]

Further harassment and threats

In mid-October, indie game developer Brianna Wu shared an image macro on Twitter that mocked GamerGate supporters as, among other things, "fighting an apocalyptic future where women are 8 percent of programmers and not 3 percent." Soon afterwards her home address and other identifying information were posted on 8chan. Wu then became the target of rape and death threats on Twitter and elsewhere, which Wu and a number of sources have attributed to GamerGate supporters. After contacting police, Wu fled home with her husband, but said she would not allow the threats to intimidate her into silence.[40][41][42][43] Wu later offered a personal reward for any information leading to a conviction for those involved in her harassment, and set up a legal fund to help any other game developers that have been harassed online.[44]

Soon afterwards, Sarkeesian canceled a speaking appearance at Utah State University after the school received several anonymous terrorist threats, at least one of which claimed affiliation with Gamergate.[45] The threats included allusions to the École Polytechnique massacre, a 1989 mass shooting motivated by anti-feminism. Though Sarkeesian had spoken before at other events in the wake of Gamergate which had received similar threats, she opted to cancel when the school could not assure her safety under existing Utah state weapons laws.[40][46][47][48] The New York Times referred to the threat as "the most noxious example of a weekslong campaign to discredit or intimidate outspoken critics of the male-dominated gaming industry and its culture."[40] Some GamerGate supporters have alleged that Wu and Sarkeesian made up the threats themselves as a so-called "false flag," which led The Verge to describe the movement as "completely devoid of empathy."[49]

Felicia Day
Wil Wheaton
Chris Kluwe
Felicia Day (left), Wil Wheaton (center), and Chris Kluwe (right), all gamers, made posts critical of GamerGate on social media, but only Day was singled out for harassment. [50][51]

After actress and gamer Felicia Day made a blog post noting her concerns over GamerGate and how she has avoided discussing it due to fear of the backlash, her address was posted in the comments section. Actor Wil Wheaton and former NFL player Chris Kluwe also posted criticisms of GamerGate, with Kluwe's being noted for its use of "creative insults", but neither was doxxed.[52][50][51][53] This contrast between targeting a woman over two men was cited by some commentators, including Stephen Colbert, as evidence of there being misogynistic intent behind the harassment.[54][55]

In an interview with NPR's Marketplace, voice actress Jennifer Hale called on the gaming community to improve the self-policing of its "small" and "vicious" fringe, and said there are still race and gender barriers within the industry.[56] Writing for Vox, Todd VanDerWerff wrote that the hashtags's "actually interesting concerns" were being "warped and drowned out by an army of trolls spewing bile, often at women."[1] A portion of Gamergate supporters, called the "Gamergate moderate" by David Auerbach, have been working to identify and report those that have engaged in harassment under the Gamergate banner, and to better present the concerns of the Gamergate hashtag to the public at large.[57] In Salon, Elias Isquith criticized Auerbach's analysis, calling it an appeal to moderation "that negates any group or individual responsibility" for Gamergate's behavior.[58] One concern is that Internet trolls are responsible for many of the threats solely out of a desire to stir up conflict.[59][60][61] One Gamergate supporter interviewed by BBC said that "the issue is quickly descending into a quagmire attracting trolls, extremists, and opportunists needlessly stirring the pot of controversy ... harassment [affects] both sides of this situation".[59]

Various supporters, some who requested to remain anonymous, said that they had been harassed for supporting GamerGate, and one said after he reported threats to police he was instructed to leave his home.[60] Breitbart's Milo Yiannopoulos tweeted that he had received a syringe in the mail, but was not concerned,[62][63] and YouTube personality Steven "boogie2988" Williams also remarked that a comment on one of his videos included his address and a threat to his wife's life.[61][64] The BBC reported that "misogynist abuse - and vitriolic messages in general - is not limited to either 'side' of the argument".[59]

Industry response

The harassment campaigns launched against Quinn, Sarkeesian, Wu and others have led many industry professionals to speak out against Gamergate, condemning the attacks it has spawned as damaging for the video gaming community. Independent game developer Andreas Zecher wrote an open letter calling upon the community to take a public stand against the attacks, which attracted the signatures of more than two thousand professionals within the gaming industry.[4][29] The large and varied response to the letter was considered by many in the industry to be a sign that the people involved in the harassment attacks were not representative and comprised a "vocal minority" of the overall industry population.[34]

The Entertainment Software Association (ESA) issued a statement condemning the series of harassment, stating "There is no place in the video game community—or our society—for personal attacks and threats."[65] At BlizzCon 2014, Blizzard Entertainment president and co-founder Mike Morhaime denounced recent harassment, blaming "a small group of people [who] have been doing really awful things" and "tarnishing our reputation" as gamers. He called on attendees to treat each other with kindness and demonstrate to the world that the community rejects harassment. His statements have been widely interpreted as referring to GamerGate.[66][67][68][69] When asked about the controversy Sony Computer Entertainment of America CEO Shawn Layden called harassment and bullying "completely unacceptable", but that there isn't "one statement or one position on it, or one answer to whatever this very broadly-defined #GamerGate really means".[70][71] Developer Peter Molyneux stated that the industry needs to "adopt a level of professionalism and diversity commensurate with other industries", and recognizing some of the issues surrounding Gamergate existed within the industry; Molyneux pointed to the large amount of support Valve's Gabe Newell received after being sent a death threat from a developer who was condemned widely and quickly by the community, but found the lack of similar prompt action in the case of the harassment of female figures in Gamergate disturbing.[72]

Twitter itself has received complaints due to its inability to respond quickly and prevent harassment over the service. Brianna Wu, shortly after becoming a target of harassment, stated that Twitter "makes it very easy to create an account—and then create another account—to harass people with", and challenged the service to improve the speed of responsiveness to abusive account requests.[73] Robinson Meyer of The Atlantic said Gamergate is an "identity crisis" for Twitter, as by not dealing with harassing users as Facebook has, the platform is failing to protect victims and losing readers.[74] In November 2014, Twitter announced a collaboration with the non-profit group Women, Action & the Media (WAM), in which those who believed they have been harassed over Twitter can report harassment to a tool monitored by WAM members, who would forward affirmed issues to Twitter within 24 hours. The move, while in the wake of the Gamergate harassment, was due to long-standing issues of the harassment of women on the Internet, and the data will be studied for further discussion.[75]

Debate over legitimacy of ethics concerns

Many Gamergate supporters contend that the movement is concerned with ethical issues in video games journalism. However, observers tend to describe it as a culture war against diversifying social norms in video games — and women in particular.[29] Evidence which is said to justify this belief is the movement's origination in false accusations and trolling, its frequent harassment of female figures in the gaming industry, its disinterest in criticizing ethical issues with major game publishers, and its opposition to social criticism and analysis of video games.[76]

Some news sites have adopted new policies in response to the controversy. Polygon now requires its writers to disclose contributions via Patreon, while Kotaku prohibits its staff from supporting any game developers through the website, except where it is required in order to access materials for review.[77][78] Defy Media adopted stricter ethical standards policies for all of their subsidiaries, including The Escapist and GameFront. Destructoid updated its ethics policies after Gearbox Software developer Anthony Burch pointed out his connections with Destructoid staff.[79]

Commentators largely view the movement's journalism ethics claims as ill-founded and disingenuous. Examining the controversy, Columbia Journalism Review writer Chris Ip said "many criticisms of press coverage by people who identify with Gamergate (...) have been debunked" and concluded that "at core, the movement is a classic culture war."[80] Alex Goldman of NPR's On the Media criticized GamerGate for targeting female indie developers rather than AAA games publishers, and said the movement's claims of unethical behavior by Quinn and Sarkeesian were unfounded.[81]

Blogger Kelly Maxwell, a GamerGate supporter, penned a "Gamer Bill of Rights" to publicly present GamerGate's positions, which has been cited as one of the movement's few attempts at defining concrete goals. In it, Maxwell wrote that GamerGate is not about harassment, that "GamerGate is a scandal" and that the movement is opposed to "journalists pushing dogmatic fringe ethics." Maxwell says that the movement favors "freedom of expression, artistic vision and a free market," while criticizing negative reviews of video games and saying that a given video game should be reviewed only by its fans. Mic.com writers Jared Keller and Tom McKay analyzed the manifesto, finding little connection between its stated goals and journalism ethics. Instead, they found the demands to amount to blanket opposition of cultural criticism of video games, concluding that "the grandiose missive ended up being emblematic of many of the movement's excesses and miscalculations."[82] The Verge's Chris Plante wrote that under the guise of ethics concerns, GamerGate supporters repeatedly criticized him for writing reviews that discussed social criticisms of mainstream video games.[83]

In Wired, Laura Hudson wrote that "it’s telling that the hashtag remains laser-focused not on the ethically shady behavior of the multimillion-dollar gaming studios making the mainstream games they enjoy, but small, often impoverished independent creators and critics—and even within that subset, the targets are nearly exclusively women."[84] Vox writer Todd VanDerWerff highlighted an essay written by game developer David Hill, who said that "corruption", "nepotism" and excessive "commercialism" existed in the gaming industry, but that GamerGate was not addressing those issues by targeting "powerless" indie developers such as Quinn or Phil Fish. Hill instead wrote that AAA games publishers "coopted [games journalism] as a marketing arm" and said that many games journalists agree that those publishers hold too much power over the media. Hill said that Gamergate's perception of how the games industry works is "completely different" from reality.[6] Writing separately in The Week, Ryan Cooper and Marc Ambinder both criticized the movement's ethics claims. Cooper said "not a single person in the movement has been able to elaborate a coherent, morally-grounded argument" about journalism ethics, which he said demonstrated that the movement's true objective was to harass opponents of misogyny and prejudice in gaming.[85] Ambinder said that "Gamergate really can't claim to have exposed anything but their own visceral meanness, which borders on fascism." He agreed that debate about video games journalism is needed, but said the hashtag was rooted in "a vocal minority (using) the tools of internet shaming" against outspoken women. He concluded that the widely-publicized harassment incidents "have given substance to the stereotypes [gamers] hate."[86]

Writing in Vox, Todd VanDerWerff said "Every single question of journalistic ethics GamerGate has brought up has either been debunked or dealt with", yet "GamerGate seems to keep raging simply to do two things: harass women and endlessly perpetuate itself so it can keep harassing women."[76] Newsweek/Brandwatch performed an analysis of about 25% of two million Twitter messages with the Gamergate tag from September 1, 2014 onward, analyzing the data for mention of specific participants of the controversy, and the tone of the messages (positive, negative, or neutral) using automatic word detection routines. The study found in general female figures central to the debate, like Quinn, Sarkeesian, and Wu, were mentioned more frequently than their male counterparts like Grayson or Totilo, and while they received a smaller proportion of negative tweets compared to the males, they received many more net negative tweets overall.[87] Newsweek suggested from this data that "contrary to its stated goal, GamerGate spends more time tweeting negatively at game developers than at game journalists".[87]

Writing in Time, Leigh Alexander, editor-at-large of Gamasutra, described the campaign's ethics concerns as "deeply sincere" but based on "bizarre conspiracy theories," saying that there is nothing unethical about journalists being acquainted with those they cover and that "meaningful reporting" requires journalists to develop professional relationships with sources.[5] Alyssa Rosenberg of The Washington Post' said that some of the movement's ostensible "ethics" concerns about video game reviews are actually rooted in Gamergate supporters' belief that video games are "appliances" rather than "art" and should be reviewed based on feature checklists rather than "the same sort of analysis of aesthetics and ideas that have been applied to every other medium for decades, if not centuries."[88]

Liana Kerzner, writing for MetalEater.com, criticized gaming journalists for making generalizations about GamerGate supporters, saying that it had been unfair to paint all of them as motivated by ill will rather than legitimate concern for the state of games journalism. She also urged the gaming community to challenge and reject the "small subgroups of gamers" whose actions had stigmatized the community, saying that the problems of bigotry in gaming were real.[7]

GameJournoPros

In mid-September 2014, Milo Yiannopoulos of Breitbart published leaked discussions from a mailing list for gaming journalists called GameJournoPros, which included discussion of Gamergate events. Yiannopoulos and Gamergate supporters saw the mailing list as evidence of collusion between journalists.[89][60][90] Kyle Orland of Ars Technica, the founder of the group, said the accusations were misplaced, and that the list's members had diverse beliefs and frequent disagreements. He apologized for suggesting that members write a letter of solidarity to Zoe Quinn, saying the group's largely-negative reaction helped him "realize that this would be overstepping our primary role as reporters and observers."[91] Erik Kain, a contributor to Forbes.com saw the conversations as largely professional, but noted two discussions he said "ought to raise eyebrows". One was a member inquiring on when it is appropriate to report on the private lives of subjects, with a negative response. Another involved Polygon writer Ben Kuchera and The Escapist's editor-in-chief Greg Tito; Kuchera urged Tito to close a discussion on Zoe Quinn on The Escapist's forums, but Tito responded that a civil discussion should be allowed.[89] James Fudge, editor of GamePolitics.com, had joined Kuchera in suggesting that the discussion be closed because, he explained later, "allowing a thread about Zoe Quinn's sex life and repeating an accusation that wasn't true wasn't fostering discussion — it was throwing gasoline on an already untamable inferno." Following the leak, the mailing list was closed.[92]

GamerGate hashtag

Actor Adam Baldwin is credited as coining the GamerGate hashtag.

Within social media, the Twitter GamerGate hashtag was first used by actor Adam Baldwin in a tweet with links to two videos critical of Quinn, shortly after he retweeted a statement from a feminist blogger who had readjusted her stance to be critical of Quinn.[62] The tag was then used to discuss the allegations against Quinn and Grayson and other concerns about alleged corruption in gaming journalism,[93] alongside coordinated discussions on forums like 4chan and Reddit.[1][77] Because these discussions often featured verbal attacks, misogynistic harassment of Quinn and others, and doxxing, some websites blocked users and removed posts relating to the controversy, and at least one YouTube commentator had a video critical of Quinn removed following a DMCA request. Such incidents led some gamers to complain about censorship, which columnist Erik Kain said led to a Streisand effect that brought more attention to Gjoni's accusations.[77] By September 24, 2014, over 1 million Twitter messages incorporating the GamerGate hashtag had been sent,[94] while a Newsweek and Brandwatch study found more than 2 million Twitter messages between September and October 2014 with many coming from newly created accounts.[87] It is estimated that as of October 2014, there are at least 10,000 users that support GamerGate based on readership numbers on a dedicated GamerGate subreddit.[80]

Nature and organization

Following the accusations against Quinn, proponents of Gamergate began to use the "KotakuInAction" subreddit and boards on 8chan to discuss and organize activism using the hashtag. Because of its anonymous membership, lack of organization and leaderless nature, sources widely differ as to the goals or mission of GamerGate. With no single person or group able to speak for Gamergate, defining it has been difficult.[20] Upon additional threats towards Sarkeesian, Wu, and Day, international media focused on Gamergate's violent, misogynistic element and its inability to present any coherent message. Writing in The Daily Telegraph in the wake of those incidents, Bob Stuart summed up the hashtag's troubles, saying "GamerGate has since swelled into an unwieldy movement with no apparent leaders, mission statement, or aims beyond calling out 'social justice warriors'. ... When members of the games [sic] industry are being driven from their houses and jobs, threatened, or abused, it makes GamerGate’s claim that it is engaged in an ethical campaign appear laughable."[19] Christopher Grant, editor-in-chief of Polygon, said that Gamergate has remained an amorphous and leaderless movement consisting solely of the hashtag so that the harassment can be conducted without any culpability.[95] Grant said that meant that "ultimately Gamergate will be defined—I think has been defined—by some of its basest elements."[80]

Jesse Singal, writing for New York based on a post he made to Reddit, stated that he had spoken to several Gamergate supporters to try to understand their concerns, but found conflicting ideals and incoherent messages. Singal observed that despite being told by supporters that Gamergate was not about misogyny, he saw movement supporters making a constant series of attacks on Quinn, Sarkeesian and other women.[20] The Columbia Journalism Review's Chris Ip said any legitimate message from Gamergate supporters regarding ethics in journalism was being lost in the noise created by harassment, sexism, and misogyny. With anyone able to tweet under the hashtag and no single person willing or able to represent the hashtag and take responsibility for its actions, Ip said it is not possible for journalists to neatly separate abusers from those seeking reasonable debate.[80] Ryan Cooper of The Week highlighted an analysis written by writer Jon Stone, citing: "(Gamergate) readjusts and reinvents itself in response to attempts to disarm and disperse its noxiousness, subsuming disaffected voices in an act of continual regeneration, cycling through targets, pretexts, manifestoes and moralisms..."[96]

Quinn released a series of logs from chat rooms and discussion boards on 4chan, which she said showed that GamerGate was manufactured by 4chan users and largely pushed by sockpuppets.[93][97] Members of 4chan have said that some information has been taken out of context or misrepresented.[98][99]

#NotYourShield

Many supporters of the GamerGate hashtag took issue with the widespread description of their movement as misogynistic, saying that the press’s focus on misogyny served mainly to "deflect criticism of the increasingly leftist orientation of indie games".[16] To respond to this criticism, a second Twitter hashtag, "#NotYourShield", began to be used, with the intention of showing that women and other minorities in the gaming community were also critical of Quinn and Sarkeesian.[16][98][25]

Following Quinn's release of chat and discussion logs she got from 4chan, Ars Technica and The Daily Dot said that these logs showed that the #NotYourShield hashtag was manufactured on 4chan and that many of those posting under #NotYourShield were sockpuppet accounts impersonating women and minorities.[93][97] Quinn said that in light of GamerGate's exclusive targeting of women or those who stood up for women, "#notyourshield was solely designed to, ironically, be a shield for this campaign once people started calling it misogynistic."[99]

Support for The Fine Young Capitalists

Main article: The Fine Young Capitalists

A self-described radical feminist group known as The Fine Young Capitalists began receiving financial backing for their game jam from Gamergate supporters, particularly those from 4chan's board /v/, after it was discovered that the group had a prior dispute with Zoe Quinn concerning their planned competition's rules.[77][100] The backers raised over US$17,000 for the campaign, after which they were allowed to produce an original character to be featured in the winning video game proposal, resulting in the creation of the character "Vivian James" (a pun on "video games").[77][101] In Forbes, Erik Kain described the character as an "every-girl of sorts, and maybe not what you'd expect from 4chan".[77] Tom Mendelsohn of The Independent wrote that 4chan had created Vivian as an emblem for their campaign to demonstrate their lack of sexism, and described the character as "a sardonic dream woman who games in slouchy hoodies, has long, lascivious tresses of red hair and doesn't ever want to hurt them".[102]

Both Steven Melendez in Fast Company and Rob Beschizza of Boing Boing linked the character's green and purple color scheme to a 4chan rape joke. Beschizza said that most Gamergaters "were obviously not clued into the color scheme's history," but Melendez wrote that this undermined "the group's stated goal of creating a deliberately non-sexualized, gamer-girl-next-door mascot". Matthew Rappard of TFYC, along with other supporters on 4chan, said there was no link to the old meme and that green and purple were symbolic of 4chan, but Melendez and Beschizza noted acknowledgement of the meme in 4chan threads leading to the creation of Vivian James.[103][104]

On August 24, 2014, The Fine Young Capitalists reported that their Indiegogo account had been compromised by an unknown party (later confirmed by Indiegogo staff), and had been replaced by a message claiming Indiegogo staff had shut down the campaign and specifically called out 4chan's video games board /v/ as being "abhorrent" for their participation in the harassment against Zoe Quinn.[105]

End of Gamer Identity articles and "Operation Disrespectful Nod"

In August 2014, shortly following the initial accusations towards Quinn, a number of gaming sites published op-eds which argued for the "end of the gamer identity", citing the growing diversity of gaming and the mainstreaming of the medium, while those associated with GamerGate were stated to be a reactionary force against these changes.[32][106][107] Some of these articles and essays were, heavily critical of gamer culture and sexism within it. One of these, a Leigh Alexander column in the game developer trade publication Gamasutra titled "'Gamers' don't have to be your audience. 'Gamers' are over," argued that "developers and writers alike want games about more things, and games by more people. We will get this, because we’re creating culture now."[15][108] Responding to articles such as Gamasutra's piece, David Auerbach of Slate accused the games press of attacking their own readers, arguing that video game journalists risk obsolescence as audiences turn to commentators and amateur journalists.[18] Other concerns about the divide between gaming journalists and gamers were raised by The Guardian's Keith Stuart and Forbes.com contributor Erik Kain.[2][109]

Gamergate supporters were critical of articles that spoke of the "death of the gamer identity" such as Leigh Alexander's piece in Gamasutra. In response, supporters organized "Operation Disrespectful Nod," an e-mail campaign to advertisers demanding that they drop several involved publications. After receiving complaints from Gamergate supporters, Intel withdrew an ad campaign from Gamasutra in October. Intel's decision was widely criticized as an apparent endorsement of the movement,[110] leading to a corporate statement from Intel which apologized for appearing to take sides in the controversy.[111][112] In mid-November, Intel began advertising on Gamasutra again, saying the site's game-developer readership was an important market for the company.[113]

Gawker Media and "Operation Baby Seal"

In mid-October 2014, Sam Biddle, an editor for the Gawker affiliate Valleywag, made a series of tweets that concluded with a call for a return to the bullying of nerds. This led to Mercedes-Benz temporarily pulling advertising from Gawker and Adobe Systems requesting that Gawker remove their logo from a portion of the Gawker website.[114] Gawker reported losing "thousands of dollars" as a result[115] but editor-in-chief Max Read said his only regret was that the site had not adequately "called out" GamerGate's "breathtaking cynicism and dishonesty."[116] Adobe later clarified that it had never been a Gawker advertiser and stated "we are not and have never been aligned with Gamergate."[115][117][118][119] Biddle later defended himself saying that the tweets were jokes, but ultimately apologized for their content.[120][114] Commenting on the actions of Intel and Adobe and the public response, trade publication Advertising Age warned advertisers that responding to Gamergate was a "lose-lose situation", and that brands "not responding are in better shape than those who have".[121] In December 2014, Dyson reversed its earlier withdrawal of advertisements from Gawker and resumed advertising on the network.[122]

Gawker Media affiliate Kotaku was at the center of the initial allegations that started Gamergate. Gamergate supporters initiated "Operation Baby Seal" in late October, renewing focus upon Gawker. This campaign aimed at removing Google's AdSense and Amazon's Associates advertising platforms from Gawker by mass-reporting apparent violations of the ad agencies' terms of service in Gawker's published content. Vox's VanDerWerff identified that while past efforts of Gamergate to convince advertisers to pull ads has been something done through the history of journalism, this new tactic of targeting the ad providers is on "a whole other scale" and has the potential, if successful, to financially harm Gawker. He stated that the campaign showed that Gamergate "seems less to want to expose ethical lapses at this point and more to drive sites it doesn't agree with from the face of the Earth."[123]

Other actions by GamerGate supporters have been the practice of using archive sites that remove advertisements to "attempt to divert advertising revenue" from specific websites while still using those sites for information. Jason Koebler writing on Vice's Motherboard imprint was critical of this, arguing that the archival of thousands of such articles did not comply with the fair use doctrine of American copyright law.[124]

Accusations against digital games academics and researchers

Some GamerGate supporters[who?] alleged that the Digital Games Research Association (DiGRA), a non-profit group that coordinates academic research on video games, was working with journalists to advance a feminist agenda. Inside Higher Ed described the argument as a "conspiracy theory".[125] Prof. Mia Consalvo, president of DiGRA, said that the effort to discredit its members' research demonstrates hostility to feminism and a failure to understand academic research.[125] The Executive Board of DiGRA has publicly condemned "the harassment and bullying that some of its members have faced over the last few months due to their work researching and studying video games."[126]


Political views

GamerGate has frequently been described as 'anti-feminist'; some voices within it have denied this label, though they have acknowledged that there are misogynistic voices within it.[127][101][128][60][61] Commentators have been divided over its political characterization beyond that, ranging from Jon Stone, in The Guardian, who called it "a swelling of vicious right-wing sentiment" and comparing it the men's rights movement[127], to Cathy Young, who, writing for Reason, described GamerGate supporters as leaning left-libertarian, but said that it included right-wing voices who support the hashtag to oppose feminism.[62] Commentators such as Liana Kerzner and Sam Biddle have also said that a number of the conservative pundits who have involved themselves in the movement -- such as Sommers, Yiannopoulos, and Baldwin -- had little involvement in videogames before hand, and in some cases spoke of them with contempt.[129][96][130]

Role of misogyny and antifeminism

See also: Sexism in video gaming

A number of commentators have argued that the GamerGate hashtag had the potential to raise important issues in gaming journalism, but that the wave of misogynistic harassment and abuse associated with the hashtag had poisoned the well, making it impossible to separate honest criticism from sexist trolling.[1][16][81] The hashtag has also been associated with criticism of feminism and so called "Social Justice Warriors." According to Sarah Kaplan of The Washington Post, "sexism in gaming is a long-documented, much-debated but seemingly intractable problem," and became the crux of the GamerGate controversy.[16] Writing in The Week, Ryan Cooper called the harassment campaign "an online form of terrorism" intended to reverse a trend in gaming culture toward increasing acceptance of women, and stated that social media platforms need to tighten their policies and protections against threats and abuse.[131] Speaking on Iowa Public Radio, academic Cindy Tekobbe said the harassment campaign was intended to "drive women out of public spaces" and intimidate them into silence.[132] The feminist journalist and author Laurie Penny characterized the reasons for the ferocity of the reaction against the shift in gaming culture thus: "The problem is that women are creating culture, changing culture, redefining culture, and those cunts, those poisonous cunts, those disgusting, uppity cunts must be stopped."[133]

Issues like sexism and misogyny had been identified as problems in the video game industry and community prior to the events of Gamergate.[134] Wu stated in a November 2014 interview with Develop that the game industry "has been a boys’ club for 30 years", describing that the common portrayal of women as "sex symbols and damsels in distress" in video games has led to the players taking the same attitudes.[72] In March 2014, game designer Cliff Bleszinski wrote a blog post commenting on the "latent racism, homophobia and misogyny" that existed within the online gaming community.[135] It is believed this itself is tied to the anonymous, male-dominated nature of the Internet; Astra Taylor of Mother Jones documented harassment against women from online communities in April 2014, in which the harassment was played off by the male posters as if it was just "harmless locker room talk".[136] Developer Peter Molyneux considered that the Internet's instant accessibility of social media allows for people to express of-the-moment opinions without thinking about their consequences, leading to a "whole Pandora’s Box" of both good and bad issues that society must consider in terms of freedom of speech.[72]

Attacks on women

Quinn said the campaign had "roped well-meaning people who cared about ethics and transparency into a pre-existing hate mob",[137] and urged industry publishers and developers to condemn the hashtag.[59] She further asked those Gamergate supporters that had any earnest discussion about ethics should move away from the "Gamergate" tag[59] Writing for The Guardian, Jenn Frank described the tactics used in the harassment campaign, and the climate of fear it generated through its attacks on women and their allies. Frank concluded that this alienating abusive environment would harm not only women, but the industry as a whole. Frank subsequently received harassment alleging that she had concealed her Patreon support of Quinn; Frank had included a disclosure, but it was removed by editors at The Guardian who did not deem their relationship a "significant connection". Following the harassment, Frank left games journalism.[1][18][138] Amanda Marcotte in an article for The Daily Beast described the controversy as arising from the comments of a "vindictive ex-boyfriend", stated it was "pure misogyny to use online harassment troops" against Quinn, and that the ethics violation discussion is merely a "desperate attempt to justify" their harassment. Marcotte noted that the allegation of Quinn having sex for a favorable review of her game was wrong, and accused the video game world of being, "thick with misogynists who are aching to swarm on any random woman held up for them to hate, no matter what the pretext." She also made comparisons to the initial outrage against Sarkeesian's video series, harassment sent to a woman who made a negative review of a Teen Titans cover and to a community manager for the Mighty No. 9 video game because she drew a feminine Mega Man, and virtual "rapes" committed against women's player avatars in Grand Theft Auto V and DayZ.[139] In an interview on The Colbert Report, Sarkeesian said she believes women are being targeted because they are "challenging the status quo of gaming as a male-dominated space."[140]

Writing in The New Yorker, Simon Parkin said, "In Quinn's case, the fact that she was the subject of the attacks rather than the friend who wrote about her game reveals the true nature of much of the criticism: a pretense to make further harassment of women in the industry permissible."[10] T.C. Sottek, a news editor of The Verge, wrote an editorial urging people to stop supporting Gamergate, detailing various issues he perceived in the hashtag, including using the search for ethics as a justification for the harassment campaign, little credibility in their claims, convincing apolitical gamers that a problem existed, and its embrace of anti-feminist conservative journalists and commentators. He described the hashtag as a "boggling witch hunt that continues to raise more questions than it answers because it didn't have any useful questions to ask in the first place", saying that its origin was attacks on Zoe Quinn concerning her personal life.[128]

Alex Goldman from On the Media wrote that the movement's involvement in harassment had caused it to lose mainstream credibility. "If you see yourself as a bloc of people who call themselves "gamers," to outsiders you are only as good as your worst representatives, and the past month have shown those representatives to be racist, homophobic, misogynist, and threatening," Goldman said. "If you want to be seen as a monolith, publicly shame the bad actors in your cohort. If you want to be seen as individuals, well, stop calling yourself gamers. Come up with some other means of self-identification. Because as of right now, the worst people standing behind the mantle of gamer have spoiled it for all of you."[81] The Washington Post described a supporter of the hashtag as saying that they and others in the hashtag are making efforts to reject harassment and "quickly" report threatening or hateful comments to help keep the conversation "respectful".[60]

In an opinion piece for The New York Times, Chris Suellentrop spoke of his issues with the hashtag such as its attacks on women, but also brought up the desire of GamerGate to shift focus away from innovative uses of the medium. He criticized the hashtags's apparent belief that increased coverage and praise of artistic games like Gone Home would negatively affect big mainstream games such as Grand Theft Auto V. He also noted that a colleague was the centre of a petition to have her fired for criticizing the portrayal of women in GTAV, despite many male critics (including himself) raising similar concerns.[135]

See also

References

  1. ^ a b c d e f g h VanDerWerff, Todd (September 6, 2014). "#GamerGate: Here's why everybody in the video game world is fighting". Vox. Archived from the original on October 2, 2014. Retrieved September 7, 2014.
  2. ^ a b c Stuart, Keith (September 3, 2014). "Gamergate: the community is eating itself but there should be room for all". The Guardian. Retrieved September 14, 2014.
  3. ^ Kubas-Meyer, Alec (September 17, 2014). "Death of 'Gamer' Identity: How Hardcore Trolls Pwned Themselves". The Daily Beast. Retrieved September 22, 2014.
  4. ^ a b Todd Martens (September 6, 2014). "Hero Complex: Gamergate-related controversy reveals ugly side of gaming community". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved September 7, 2014.
  5. ^ a b c d Leigh Alexander (September 5, 2014). "Sexism, Lies, and Video Games: The Culture War Nobody Is Winning". Time. Retrieved September 7, 2014.
  6. ^ a b VanDerWerff, Todd (September 15, 2014). "The confusion around #GamerGate explained, in three short paragraphs". Vox Media. Retrieved September 15, 2014.
  7. ^ a b Kerzner, Liana (September 12, 2014). "Gamers Live: An In-Depth Analysis of GamerGate". MetalEater.com. Retrieved September 15, 2014.
  8. ^ a b Crecente, Brian (September 4, 2014). "FBI working with game developer association to combat online harassment". Polygon. Retrieved September 15, 2014.
  9. ^ a b c Romano, Aja (August 20, 2014). "The sexist crusade to destroy game developer Zoe Quinn". The Daily Dot. Retrieved September 2, 2014.
  10. ^ a b c d e f g h Parkin, Simon (September 9, 2014). "Zoe Quinn's Depression Quest". The New Yorker. Retrieved September 15, 2014.
  11. ^ Crawley, Dan (August 12, 2014). "Depression Quest gets a quiet, but timely, release on Steam". VentureBeat. Retrieved October 26, 2014.
  12. ^ Thier, Dave (August 14, 2014). "'Depression Quest' Free In Wake Of Robin Williams' Suicide". Forbes. Retrieved October 26, 2014.
  13. ^ Hall, Charlie (August 13, 2014). "Depression Quest launches in spite of high-profile suicide and online threats". Polygon. Retrieved October 26, 2014.
  14. ^ Williams, Katie (August 14, 2014). "Depression Quest Now Available for Free on Steam". IGN. Retrieved October 26, 2014.
  15. ^ a b Wingfield, Nick (October 2, 2014). "Intel Pulls Ads from Site After 'Gamergate' Boycott". The New York Times. Retrieved October 2, 2014.
  16. ^ a b c d e f g h Kaplan, Sarah (September 12, 2014). "With #GamerGate, the video-game industry's growing pains go viral". Washington Post. Retrieved September 14, 2014.
  17. ^ a b Totilo, Stephen (August 20, 2014). "In recent days I've been asked several times". Kotaku. Retrieved September 10, 2014.
  18. ^ a b c Auerbach, David (September 9, 2014). "Gaming Journalism Is Over". Slate. Retrieved September 14, 2014.
  19. ^ a b Stuart, Bob (October 24, 2014). "#GamerGate: the misogynist movement blighting the video games industry — Telegraph". The Daily Telegraph. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  20. ^ a b c Singal, Jesse (October 20, 2014). "Gamergate Should Stop Lying to Itself". New York. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  21. ^ Steele, Chandra (October 21, 2014). "Everything You Never Wanted to Know About GamerGate". PC Magazine. Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  22. ^ a b Marcotte, Amanda (August 22, 2014). "Gaming Misogyny Gets Infinite Lives: Zoe Quinn, Virtual Rape, and Sexism". Retrieved September 29, 2014.
  23. ^ Singal, Jesse (September 20, 2014). "Gaming's summer of rage". The Boston Globe.
  24. ^ a b Eördögh, Fruzsina (November 25, 2014). "Gamergate and the new horde of digital saboteurs". The Christian Science Monitor. Retrieved November 25, 2014.
  25. ^ a b Sanghani, Radhika (September 10, 2014). "Misogyny, death threats and a mob of trolls: Inside the dark world of video games with Zoe Quinn — target of #GamerGate". The Telegraph. Retrieved September 14, 2014.
  26. ^ a b Quinn, Zoe (October 29, 2014). "BBC News — Zoe Quinn: GamerGate must be condemned". BBC News (Interview). Interviewed by Dave Lee. Retrieved October 31, 2014.
  27. ^ Quinn, Zoe (October 20, 2014). "Exclusive: Woman who sparked Gamergate" (Interview). Interviewed by Ronan Farrow. MSNBC. Retrieved October 26, 2014. {{cite interview}}: Unknown parameter |program= ignored (help)
  28. ^ Kolhatkar, Sheelah (November 26, 2014). "The Gaming Industry's Greatest Adversary Is Just Getting Started". Bloomberg Businessweek. Bloomberg L.P. Retrieved November 26, 2014.
  29. ^ a b c Kevin Rawlinson (September 2, 2014). "Gamers take a stand against misogyny after death threats". BBC News. Retrieved September 7, 2014. Cite error: The named reference "BBC" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  30. ^ Fernandez-Blance, Katherine (July 10, 2012). "Gamer campaign against Anita Sarkeesian catches Toronto feminist in crossfire". TheStar.com. Retrieved September 10, 2014.
  31. ^ Lyonnais, Sheena (July 10, 2012). "EXCLUSIVE: Anita Sarkeesian Responds to Beat Up Game, Online Harassment, and Death Threats on Stephanie Guthrie". Toronto Standard. Retrieved September 10, 2014.
  32. ^ a b Joseph Bernstein (August 28, 2014). "Gaming Is Leaving "Gamers" Behind". Buzzfeed. Retrieved September 7, 2014.
  33. ^ "Anita Sarkeesian shares the most radical thing you can do to support women online — The Verge". The Verge. September 13, 2014. Retrieved September 15, 2014.
  34. ^ a b Rott, Nate (September 24, 2014). "#Gamergate Controversy Fuels Debate On Women And Video Games". All Things Considered. NPR. Retrieved September 25, 2014.
  35. ^ Hollister, Sean (August 27, 2014). "'Fez II' abruptly canceled after developer Phil Fish explodes in rage on Twitter". The Verge. Retrieved September 19, 2014.
  36. ^ Vorel, Jim (August 22, 2014). "Fez Creator Phil Fish and Polytron Corporation Hacked, Doxxed". Paste. Retrieved October 2, 2014.
  37. ^ Romano, Aja (August 22, 2014). "4chan hacks and doxes Zoe Quinn's biggest supporter". The Daily Dot. Retrieved October 2, 2014.
  38. ^ Levy, Karyne (September 2, 2014). "Game Developers Are Finally Stepping Up To Change Their Hate-Filled Industry". Business Insider. Retrieved September 7, 2014.
  39. ^ Maiberg, Emanuel (August 23, 2014). "Phil Fish Selling Rights to Fez After Being Hacked". Gamespot. Retrieved September 6, 2014.
  40. ^ a b c Wingfield, Nick (October 15, 2014). "Feminist Critics of Video Games Facing Threats in 'GamerGate' Campaign". The New York Times. Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  41. ^ "Video Game Developer: Twitter Rape, Death Threats Forced Me From Home". Boston.com. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  42. ^ Stuart, Keith (October 11, 2014). "Brianna Wu and the human cost of Gamergate: 'every woman I know in the industry is scared'". The Guardian. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  43. ^ "Game developer Brianna Wu leaves home after receiving death threats for speaking out in support of women". VentureBeat. October 10, 2014. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  44. ^ Weber, Rachel (November 3, 2014). "Wu offers $11K for harassment conviction". GamesIndustry.biz. Retrieved November 5, 2014.
  45. ^ Erin Alberty (October 16, 2014). "Feminist media critic calls for boycott of Utah campuses". The Salt Lake Tribune. The Salt Lake Tribune. Retrieved November 2, 2014.
  46. ^ Ahmed, Saeed; Marco, Tony (October 15, 2014). "Anita Sarkeesian cancels Utah State speech after threat — CNN.com". CNN. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  47. ^ Kelion, Leo (October 15, 2014). "BBC News — Feminist video-games talk cancelled after massacre threat". BBC News. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  48. ^ Hern, Alex (October 15, 2014). "Feminist games critic cancels talk after terror threat". The Guardian. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  49. ^ Robertson, Adi (October 23, 2014). "Gamergate can't stop being about harassment". The Verge. Retrieved October 31, 2014.
  50. ^ a b Hern, Alex (October 23, 2014). "Felicia Day's public details put online after she described Gamergate fears". the Guardian. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  51. ^ a b Dockterman, Eliana (October 23, 2014). "Felicia Day Writes About #GamerGate, Gets Information Hacked". TIME. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  52. ^ McDonald, Soraya Nadia (October 24, 2014). "Gamergate targets Felicia Day after she expresses fear of being targeted". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  53. ^ Griggs, Brandon (October 24, 2014). "Actress harassed online over #Gamergate". CNN. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  54. ^ McCormick, Rich (October 30, 2014). "Stephen Colbert takes on Gamergate with Anita Sarkeesian". The Verge. Retrieved November 18, 2014.
  55. ^ McDonald, Soraya Nadia (October 30, 2014). "How media critic Anita Sarkeesian turned Stephen Colbert into a feminist". The Washington Post. Retrieved November 18, 2014.
  56. ^ Hale, Jennifer (September 10, 2014). "Questions raised over bullying in the gaming community". Marketplace (Interview). Interviewed by Noel King. Retrieved September 22, 2014.
  57. ^ Auerbach, David (October 28, 2014). "How to End Gamergate". Slate. Retrieved October 28, 2014.
  58. ^ Isquith, Elias (November 1, 2014). "Gamergate's infuriating myth: Why searching for common ground is a big mistake". Salon. Retrieved November 1, 2014.
  59. ^ a b c d e Lee, Dave (October 30, 2014). "Zoe Quinn: GamerGate must be condemned". BBC. Retrieved October 30, 2014.
  60. ^ a b c d e Tsukayama, Hayley (October 24, 2014). "How some Gamergate supporters say the controversy could stop "in one week"". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 28, 2014.
  61. ^ a b c Diver, Mike (October 20, 2014). "GamerGate Hate Affects Both Sides, So How About We End It?". Vice. Retrieved October 28, 2014.
  62. ^ a b c Cathy, Young (October 12, 2014). "GamerGate: Part I: Sex, Lies, and Gender Games". Reason. Retrieved October 28, 2014.
  63. ^ Allum Bokhari (September 25, 2014). "#GamerGate – An Issue With Two Sides". TechCrunch. Retrieved September 27, 2014.
  64. ^ Codd, Matthew (October 15, 2014). "Gamergate supporter receives death threats". Stuff.co.nz. Retrieved October 28, 2014.
  65. ^ Tsukayama, Hayley (October 15, 2014). "The game industry's top trade group just spoke out against Gamergate". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  66. ^ Sherr, Ian (November 7, 2014). "Blizzard on online harassment: It's tarnishing our reputation as gamers". CNET. Retrieved November 7, 2014.
  67. ^ Ziebart, Alex (November 7, 2014). "BlizzCon Opening Ceremony liveblog". Joystiq. Retrieved November 7, 2014.
  68. ^ Parfitt, Ben (November 10, 2014). "Morhaime uses Blizzcon speech to rally against GamerGate". Market for Home Computing and Video Games. Retrieved November 18, 2014.
  69. ^ Wilde, Tyler (November 6, 2014). "Blizzard CEO on GamerGate: "They are tarnishing our reputations as gamers"". PC Gamer. Retrieved November 18, 2014.
  70. ^ Brightman, James (November 17, 2014). "Sony's Layden: Harassment "completely unacceptable"". GamesIndustry.biz. Retrieved November 17, 2014.
  71. ^ Layden, Shawn (November 17, 2014). "Sony's North American PlayStation chief on PS4's dominance, 1-year anniversary, and GamerGate (interview)". VentureBeat (Interview). Retrieved November 18, 2014.
  72. ^ a b c Batchelor, James (November 10, 2014). "Games developers must fight internet abuse together". Develop. Retrieved November 10, 2014.
  73. ^ Brustein, Joshua (October 14, 2014). "A #GamerGate Target Wants Twitter to Make Harassment Harder". Businessweek. Retrieved November 5, 2014.
  74. ^ Meyer, Robinson (October 30, 2014). "The Existential Crisis of Public Life Online". The Atlantic. Retrieved November 5, 2014.
  75. ^ Fitzgerald, Brian (November 7, 2014). "New Online Tool Lets Twitter Users Report Harassment". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved November 7, 2014.
  76. ^ a b VanDerWerff, Todd (October 23, 2014). "#GamerGate has won a few battles. It will lose the war. - Vox". Vox. Retrieved October 31, 2014.
  77. ^ a b c d e f Erik Kain (September 4, 2014). "GamerGate: A Closer Look At The Controversy Sweeping Video Games". Forbes. Retrieved September 7, 2014.
  78. ^ Totilo, Stephen (September 5, 2014). "About GamerGate". Kotaku. Retrieved October 27, 2014.
  79. ^ Usher, William (September 15, 2014). "The Escapist, Destructoid Update Their Policies, Ethic In Light of #GamerGate". CinemaBlend. Retrieved September 16, 2014.
  80. ^ a b c d Ip, Chris (October 23, 2014). "How do we know what we know about #Gamergate?". Columbia Journalism Review. Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  81. ^ a b c Goldman, Alex (September 5, 2014). "My Attempt To Write About "Gamergate"". On The Media. Retrieved September 15, 2014.
  82. ^ Keller, Jared; McKay, Tom (November 6, 2014). "Everything Wrong (And Right) With the #GamerGate 'Bill of Rights'". Mic.com. Retrieved November 7, 2014.
  83. ^ Plante, Chris (October 30, 2014). Gamergate is dead "Gamergate is Dead". The Verge. Retrieved November 7, 2014. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  84. ^ Hudson, Laura (October 21, 2014). "Gamergate Goons Can Scream All They Want, But They Can't Stop Progress — WIRED". WIRED. Retrieved October 31, 2014.
  85. ^ Cooper, Ryan. (October 17, 2014). "Gamergate has backfired spectacularly on its nincompoop perpetrators". The Week. Retrieved November 18, 2014.
  86. ^ Ambinder, Marc (October 24, 2014). "Gamergate might be gaming sexism's Waterloo". The Week. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  87. ^ a b c Wofford, Taylor (October 25, 2014). "Is GamerGate About Media Ethics or Harassing Women? Harassment, the Data Shows". Newsweek. Retrieved October 28, 2014.
  88. ^ Rosenberg, Alyssa (October 29, 2014). "Gamergate reopens the debate over video games as art". Washington Post. Retrieved October 31, 2014.
  89. ^ a b Kain, Erik (September 20, 2014). "The Escapist #GamerGate Forums Brought Down In DDoS Attack". Forbes. Retrieved October 28, 2014.
  90. ^ Johnson, Eric (October 10, 2014). "Understanding the Jargon of Gamergate". Re/code. Retrieved October 28, 2014.
  91. ^ Orland, Kyle (September 18, 2014). "Addressing allegations of "collusion" among gaming journalists". Ars Technica. Retrieved October 28, 2014.
  92. ^ Fudge, James (October 15, 2014). "Editorial: The Truth About GamerGate and GameJournoPros". Game Politics. Retrieved October 28, 2014.
  93. ^ a b c Johnson, Casey (September 9, 2014). "Chat logs show how 4chan users created #GamerGate controversy". Ars Technica. Retrieved September 14, 2014.
  94. ^ Waugh, Rob (October 15, 2014). "GamerGate – what is it, and why are gamers so angry?". Metro. Retrieved October 24, 2014.
  95. ^ Bob Garfield (October 24, 2014). "Condemning #GamerGate". On The Media. Retrieved October 27, 2014.
  96. ^ a b Cooper, Ryan (October 7, 2014). "Intel's awful capitulation to #gamergate's sexist thugs". The Week. Retrieved October 9, 2014.
  97. ^ a b Aja Romano (September 6, 2014). "Zoe Quinn claims 4chan was behind GamerGate the whole time". The Daily Dot. Retrieved September 7, 2014.
  98. ^ a b William Audureau (September 15, 2014). "Derrière le #GamerGate, une nébuleuse antiféministe". Le Monde. Retrieved September 26, 2014.
  99. ^ a b Tito, Greg (September 7, 2014). "Exclusive: 4Chan and Quinn Respond to Gamergate Chat Logs". The Escapist. Retrieved September 14, 2014.
  100. ^ Seraphita, Nicole (September 9, 2014). "#GamerGate: An Interview with The Fine Young Capitalists". APGNation. Retrieved September 16, 2014.
  101. ^ a b Ringo, Allegra (August 28, 2014). "Meet the Female Gamer Mascot Born of Anti-Feminist Internet Drama". Vice. Retrieved September 16, 2014. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  102. ^ Tom Mendelsohn (September 5, 2014). "Zoe Quinn and the orchestrated campaign of harassment from some 'gamers'". The Independent. Retrieved September 10, 2014.
  103. ^ "The Secret Meaning Behind GamerGate's Branding". FastCo.Design. Fast Company. November 3, 2014. Retrieved November 7, 2014. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  104. ^ "Gamergate's color scheme is a rape joke--but they might not know it". Boing Boing. November 3, 2014. Retrieved November 7, 2014.
  105. ^ Perez, Sarah (August 25, 2014). "Indiegogo Campaign Hacked This Weekend, But Wasn't Part Of A Widespread Attack — TechCrunch". TechCrunch. Retrieved September 15, 2014.
  106. ^ Plunkett, Luke (August 28, 2014). "We Might Be Witnessing The 'Death of An Identity'". Kotaku. Retrieved September 22, 2014.
  107. ^ Johnston, Casey (August 28, 2014). "The death of the "gamers" and the women who "killed" them". Ars Technica. Retrieved September 22, 2014.
  108. ^ Alexander, Leigh (August 28, 2014). "'Gamers' don't have to be your audience. 'Gamers' are over". Gamasutra. Retrieved September 22, 2014.
  109. ^ Kain, Erik (September 1, 2014). "The Gamer Is Dead: Long Live The Gamer". Forbes. Retrieved September 22, 2014.
  110. ^ Brightman, James (October 3, 2014). "Game devs urge you to write Intel in response to #GamerGate". GamesIndustry.biz. Retrieved October 3, 2014.
  111. ^ "Chip Shot: Intel Issues Statement on Gamasutra Advertising". Intel. October 3, 2014. Retrieved October 3, 2014.
  112. ^ Opam, Kwame (October 3, 2014). "Intel issues apology after backlash from #GamerGate opponents". The Verge. Retrieved October 3, 2014.
  113. ^ Douglas, Ian (November 14, 2014). "Intel reinstates advertising on Gamasutra after 'Gamergate' campaign". The Telegraph. Retrieved November 18, 2014.
  114. ^ a b Dewey, Caitlin (October 20, 2014). "Inside Gamergate's (successful) attack on the media". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  115. ^ a b Levy, Karyne (October 22, 2014). "Adobe Pulls Gawker Sponsorship — Business Insider". Business Insider. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  116. ^ Read, Max (October 22, 2014). "How We Got Rolled by the Dishonest Fascists of Gamergate". Gawker. Retrieved November 12, 2014.
  117. ^ "When anti-bullying efforts backfire". Adobe Systems. October 28, 2014. Retrieved October 28, 2014.
  118. ^ Robertson, Adi (October 21, 2014). "Adobe's symbolic pro-Gamergate gesture frustrates victims". The Verge. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  119. ^ Machkovech, Sam. "After #GamerGate tweet, Adobe distances itself from Gawker "bullying" [Updated]". Ars Technica. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  120. ^ Johnson, Eric (October 22, 2014). "Adobe Distances Itself From Gawker After Writer's Gamergate Tweet". Re/code. Retrieved October 27, 2014.
  121. ^ Kantrowitz, Alex (October 24, 2014). "How Brands Should React to Gamergate: Don't". Advertising Age. Retrieved November 10, 2014.
  122. ^ Douglas, Ian (December 12, 2014). "Dyson rejects Gamergate, returns advertising to Gawker". The Telegraph. Retrieved December 12, 2014.
  123. ^ VanDerWerff, Todd (October 30, 2014). "#GamerGate's scary plan to wipe Gawker Media from the face of the Earth". Vox. Retrieved October 30, 2014.
  124. ^ Koebler, Jason (October 29, 2014). "Dear GamerGate: Please Stop Stealing Our Shit". Motherboard. Retrieved October 30, 2014.
  125. ^ a b Straumsheim, Carl (November 11, 2014). "#Gamergate and Games Research". Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved November 11, 2014.
  126. ^ "DiGRA and "Gamergate" news release on DiGRA website". November 5, 2014. Retrieved November 18, 2014.
  127. ^ a b Stone, Jon (October 13, 2014). "Gamergate's vicious right-wing swell means there can be no neutral stance". The Guardian. Retrieved October 26, 2014.
  128. ^ a b "Stop supporting Gamergate". The Verge. October 8, 2014. Retrieved October 9, 2014.
  129. ^ Kerzner, Liana (September 29, 2014). "The Darker Side of GamerGate". MetalEater.com. Retrieved September 30, 2014.
  130. ^ Biddle, Sam (October 20, 2014). "The D-List Right-Wingers Who've Turned Gamergate Into Their Loser Army". Gawker. Retrieved November 7, 2014.
  131. ^ "How to stop misogynists from terrorizing the world of gamers". The Week. September 2, 2014. Retrieved October 1, 2014.
  132. ^ "Engaging in #GamerGate: "There is that fear going into it, as a woman"". Iowa Public Radio. September 30, 2014. Retrieved October 1, 2014.
  133. ^ Penny, Laurie (October 4, 2014). "Why We're Winning: Social Justice Warriors and the New Culture War". Penny Red. Retrieved October 9, 2014.
  134. ^ Purchase, Robert (March 21, 2014). "Misogyny, racism and homophobia: where do video games stand?". Eurogamer. Retrieved November 5, 2014.
  135. ^ a b Suellentrop, Chris (October 26, 2014). "Can Video Games Survive? The Disheartening GamerGate Campaign". The New York Times. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
  136. ^ Taylor, Astra (April 10, 2014). "How the Cult of Internet Openness Enables Misogyny". Mother Jones. Retrieved November 5, 2014.
  137. ^ Pearl, Mike (September 12, 2014). "Zoe Quinn Told Us What Being Targeted By Every Troll In The World Feels Like". Vice. Retrieved September 21, 2014.
  138. ^ Frank, Jenn (September 1, 2014). "How to attack a woman who works in video gaming". The Guardian. Retrieved September 18, 2014.
  139. ^ Marcotte, Amanda (August 22, 2014). "Gaming Misogyny Gets Infinite Lives: Zoe Quinn, Virtual Rape, and Sexism". The Daily Beast. Retrieved October 2, 2014.
  140. ^ "The Colbert Report 11015 Highlights — Video Clips — The Colbert Report — Comedy Central". The Colbert Report. Comedy Central. October 29, 2014. Retrieved October 31, 2014.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Gamergate_(harassment_campaign)&oldid=638051506"