Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
NGupta123 (talk | contribs)
68 edits
Line 480: Line 480:
[[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]], I have understood, and will try and a re-do to the article with live links of Masala Magazine and Khaleej Times newspaper. However, i have come across many articles which have 1 link to the source, but have written extensively about a person and as you mentioned, they were all unambiguously promotional and were written in casual tone. Why aren't they chosen for deletion ?--[[User:NGupta123|NGupta123]] ([[User talk:NGupta123|talk]]) 08:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
[[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]], I have understood, and will try and a re-do to the article with live links of Masala Magazine and Khaleej Times newspaper. However, i have come across many articles which have 1 link to the source, but have written extensively about a person and as you mentioned, they were all unambiguously promotional and were written in casual tone. Why aren't they chosen for deletion ?--[[User:NGupta123|NGupta123]] ([[User talk:NGupta123|talk]]) 08:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
*It's likely because they haven't been caught and brought to deletion, although occasionally it will be because the one source asserts something so notable that it would merit a keep per Wikipedia's guidelines, although this is rarely the case. (See [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]]) If you see a page that looks like it violates guidelines then feel free to nominate it for deletion by way of [[WP:AfD]], [[WP:PROD]], or [[WP:SPEEDY]]. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[User talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style="color:#19197; background:#fff;"> (｡◕‿◕｡)</span>''']] 08:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
*It's likely because they haven't been caught and brought to deletion, although occasionally it will be because the one source asserts something so notable that it would merit a keep per Wikipedia's guidelines, although this is rarely the case. (See [[WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS]]) If you see a page that looks like it violates guidelines then feel free to nominate it for deletion by way of [[WP:AfD]], [[WP:PROD]], or [[WP:SPEEDY]]. [[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]][[User talk:Tokyogirl79|'''<span style="color:#19197; background:#fff;"> (｡◕‿◕｡)</span>''']] 08:57, 1 June 2015 (UTC)


[[User:Tokyogirl79|Tokyogirl79]] Thank you for the tip. I surely will keep a look out for such articles, and will nominate the ones i have read in the past which fit into the criteria you mentioned. I still wonder why the article i wrote earlier was deleted, however at that time, the sources were verified, and its unfortunate that a website had a downlink. I don't see a reason to delete if the content was a bit casual, if a prior intimation was made i could have rectified it. The only reason mentioned was the sources were of external link, and i don't see why a newspaper or a reputable magazine would not fall in the criteria of verifiable source.


==Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/UTAX (UK) Limited==
==Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/UTAX (UK) Limited==

Revision as of 09:08, 1 June 2015

Welcome. Please note that this page is NOT for challenging the outcome of deletion discussions or to address the pending deletion of any page.
Shortcuts


Requests for undeletion is a process intended to assist users in restoring pages or files that were uncontroversially deleted via proposed deletion, under certain speedy deletion criteria (such as maintenance deletions or rejected Articles for creation drafts), or in "articles for deletion" debates with little or no participation other than the nominator. This page is also intended to serve as a central location to request that deleted content be userfied or emailed to you so the content can be improved upon prior to re-insertion into the mainspace, or used elsewhere (you may also make a request directly to one of the administrators listed here). This means that content deleted after discussion—at articles for deletion, categories for discussion, or miscellany for deletion among other deletion processes—may in some cases be provided to you, but such controversial page deletions will not be overturned through this process. Copyright violations and attack pages will not be provided at all.

This page is only for requesting undeletion of articles or files which have already been deleted. If the article you are concerned about is still visible, but has a warning message (template) at the top, please do not post here, but follow the instructions in the template or on your talk page.

Note that requests for undeletion is not a replacement for deletion review. If you feel an administrator has erred in closing a deletion discussion or in applying a speedy deletion criterion, please contact them directly. If you discuss but are unable to resolve the issue on their talk page, it should be raised at Wikipedia:Deletion review, rather than here.

Instructions for special cases
float
float
float
float
Please enter the page's title to request its undeletion:

Deletion discussions
Articles
Templates and modules
Files
Categories
Redirects
Miscellany
Speedy deletion
Proposed deletion

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Carl Van

Not done. Hi Openallnite. That draft blatantly infringed on copyrighted content from various places such as from here and so it will not be undeleted. Please also note that the draft read like an advertisement written by a corporate PR company to such an extent that I might even characterize it as "unsalvageably promotional", and could never have been accepted as written. If you try again – this time without copying and pasting any else's writing – you must write in a very different, neutral manner. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk)

Yotta Solutions

I don't belong to Yotta Solutions company. I am just talking about a big company here in Jordan, since it's an encyclopedia of popular companies that have done such a great achievements. Please take a look on it again. Thank you -Mikon47 (talk) 19:34, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • This has already been deleted five times, including an AFD that did not complete. I suggest that you start with a draft at Draft:Yotta Solutions. Make sure that it includes independent references to show notability. Don't just include the companies it did business for, these are not independent. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Diana Napolis

Please userfy both talk page and article to my space I am going to add some sources and work on it -Valoem talk contrib 01:28, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've found a number of pages that were deleted on WP:G5 (sockpuppetry provision) because of alleged creation by User:Bazaan/User:Merchant of Asia. As my last request above found that page was not actually made by the user, I have suspicion that some of these were also incorrectly deleted on that basis. According to WP:BLOCKEVASION:

Anyone is free to revert any edits made in violation of a block, without giving any further reason and without regard to the three-revert rule. This does not mean that edits must be reverted just because they were made by a blocked editor (obviously helpful changes, such as fixing typos or undoing vandalism, can be allowed to stand), but the presumption in ambiguous cases should be to revert.

These pages are very interesting and important, but I have some separate concerns on some of them as well. I have not found any AfDs on these that I list.

A productive contribution which is also a good companion to its article: Natural gas and petroleum in Bangladesh -– Nahiyan8 (talk | contribs) 07:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A important contribution which significantly contributes to the main article: Ispahani family (it's not actually a fringe topic, the Ispahani name is well-known.) -– Nahiyan8 (talk | contribs) 07:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to this, it was well-cited. The topic is actually very substantial and it's also probably one of the biggest industries of Bangladesh. (Example of importance: [1] [2]) -– Nahiyan8 (talk | contribs) 07:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The topic is important but I don't know much about Burma. This might not have been created by User:Merchant of Asia. -– Nahiyan8 (talk | contribs) 07:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This may be a redirect but I can't confirm. If it is please redirect it to the undeleted article Natural gas and petroleum in Bangladesh. If not, the content could be merged. Thank you. -– Nahiyan8 (talk | contribs) 07:36, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:90min

I, HarrisEvan, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. HarrisEvan (talk) 08:42, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

FBReader

Was PROD. Request it be moved to my user draft space so article may be improved; have identified a dozen or so reliable sources which discuss software in detail. --- dsprc [talk] 08:53, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Butterfly Gang

I, 174.0.80.139, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 174.0.80.139 (talk) 13:56, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alessandro Capone linguist

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -151.46.77.99 (talk) 16:45, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing in this article which is not backed up by information that can be easily found through the web.

The bias against Alessandro capone is evident.

Not done - this Requests for Undeletion process is only for articles that were deleted uncontroversially, and does not apply to articles deleted after a deletion discussion. Since the article you are here about was deleted after a discussion took place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alessandro Capone (linguist), it cannot be undeleted through this process. However, if you believe that the outcome of the discussion did not reflect the consensus of the participants, or that significant new information has come to light since the article was deleted, you may contact the administrator who closed the discussion, user Cirt (talk · contribs). After you do so, if your concerns are not addressed and you still seek undeletion, a request may be made at deletion review.- McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 17:22, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:User

I'd like to know if any of the deleted edits to this page were made using Twinkle. (Edits made using Twinkle generally have edit summaries ending in (TW).)If so, could you please provide me with the revision details line(s) for those revisions as found in Special:Undelete? Thanks. -— This, that and the other (talk) 07:16, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@This, that and the other: Of the last three edits made to that page, two were CSD reqs made with twinkle:
  • 20:18, May 24, 2015 . . Steel1943 (talk | contribs | block) (1,627 bytes) (Requesting speedy deletion (CSD U2). (TW))
  • (one intermediate revision)
  • 21:45, May 22, 2015 . . Steel1943 (talk | contribs | block) (3,509 bytes) (Requesting speedy deletion (CSD U2). (TW))
They should be in the tagger's CSD log as well. Hope that helps. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 20:08, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
That all? OK then, thanks for that. — This, that and the other (talk) 01:38, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • The rest of the notifications are from AFCH, not twinkle. Well, there's one for example that is a G13 but the tag is AFCH not TW. The only two revisions tagged with TW specifically are the ones above. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 23:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Michael Trieb

I, Leachim 1, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Leachim 1 (talk) 07:59, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: - Michael Trieb already exists on the Main space. JMHamo (talk) 16:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Strateo

I, 93.191.223.242, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 93.191.223.242 (talk) 08:19, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Steven Oberman

I, Kimdavis621, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kimdavis621 (talk) 10:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LimitedEdition.lk

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Taamara desilva (talk) 11:36, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I, Taamara de Silva request the undeletion of this Article for creation submission. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (Deb (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. This isn't a G13 speedy deletion; it's a G11, which will not be restored here. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done and will not be done Shopping for LimitedEdition.lk products has never been easier! This isn't an advertisement platform for non-notable companies. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:35, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Boxwood Festivals and Workshops

I, 104.129.194.49, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 104.129.194.49 (talk) 12:27, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:38, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mattias_Svensson_-_Swedish_double_bassist_%26_composer

I, 81.230.61.213, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 81.230.61.213 (talk) 13:34, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We don't need the full URL of the page; just the full title will suffice. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 16:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:44, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Victoria "T-Lady" McCray

I, 128.177.161.145, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 128.177.161.145 (talk) 16:08, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:48, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Tusk Bilasimo/sandbox

I, Tusk Bilasimo, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tusk Bilasimo (talk) 17:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC) Much appreciated[reply]

Tusk

Not done That is not an article submission, it was a paragraph of apparent nonsense text. You're free to re-create the sandbox if you wish. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 17:46, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Stephanie Barkley

I, TrentKennedy3, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. TrentKennedy3 (talk) 18:14, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:IDE (company)

I, Tillick, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Tillick (talk) 20:33, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Sexual Minorities Archives

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Bennwalton (talk) 21:00, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nebraska Latino American Commission

Will redo the Page. Page was deleted due to inactivity, that will not happen now, the plan is to work on and complete the page by September. -Jasel.Cantu (talk) 21:03, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:50, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Draft:JC de Ferrières

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jonkmanskas (talk) 21:47, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:18, 26 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Deletion undo request: Al Habtoor Motors LLC

This Al Habtoor Motors LLC page was marked for speedy deletion.

With all the respect for Wiki and it moderators, i would like to mention that intention of adding this page was not to promote or advertise this company on Wiki. My intention was to add Al Habtoor Motors LLC company information, I may have added information like Awards won by the "AHM" company which made it sound like it is being marketed.

AHM is one of the leading distributors of several Automotive brands like Bentley, Bugatti, Mitsubishi, JAC Motors etc in United Arab Emirates and deserves to be there like other companies that are listed on wiki.

I would appreciate your help in this regarding or at-least how i can try again to add information about same company on wiki withig the wiki guidelines

Note: This page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion G11, indicating an page that was irredeemably promotional or blatant advertising. Note that G11 deletions are more an issue with the tone of the page as opposed to its sources or formatting. As articles deleted under G11 need to be rewritten from scratch, they will not be undeleted here or anywhere else; try contacting the deleting administrator (Ritchie333 (talk · contribs)) in order to be emailed a copy of the article as it stood at time of deletion. Also note that "X exists, therefore Y should" is not a valid rationale for retention or undeletion of an article. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 04:16, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kavitha161978/sandbox

I, 183.82.104.141, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 183.82.104.141 (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done The submitted article was just the phrase "I like to edit scope of nursing in india in the page Nursing in India." That's not really an article, just a declaration of your intent, which is why it was declined at AfC. You can use your sandbox to create a new article in this topic, but there wasn't really anything to restore. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:33, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WorldDirector

I, Alcot, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AlCot 06:09, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

will rewrite and reedit later -AlCot 06:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

  • Not done This page was deleted multiple times as WP:G11, unambiguous advertising or promotion. Phrases like "believed to be the first of its kind" are pretty promotional and just offhand it looks like the article would need to be completely re-written in order to meet the NPOV policy. I'm also a little leery about your phrasing that you'd re-write and re-edit this "later". If by some chance this would be restored (which is extremely unlikely) it would need to be edited now rather than later as it would be extremely likely that the page would just be re-nominated for speedy deletion. If you are interested in creating a new version I'd recommend going through WP:AfC, since there does appear to be a WP:COI here. I've salted the page to prevent re-creation in the mainspace before a version of this is accepted via AfC. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:30, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Ostrzyga

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Clemenza5 (talk) 14:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please note that you never submitted the entry for review. When you are ready, you need to click the green notice in the template at the top of the page that says "Submit your draft when you are ready for it to be reviewed!" §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:28, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ralph Pallen Coleman

I, Rapaco, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rapaco (talk) 15:57, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page isn't deleted, therefore there's no reason to undelete it. Please follow the instructions on the deletion tag in order to contest (if a speedy deletion or prod/stickyprod) or argue against (if a deletion debate) deletion. The page was restored 22 May. Please do NOT post the entire contents of the draft here; this page is not for hosting drafts. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:12, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Although there was nothing to restore, someone has removed the G13 tag, and another has moved it to Draft:Ralph Pallen Coleman. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:10, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Dean Leffingwell

I, VanessaSAI, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. VanessaSAI (talk) 16:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 18:29, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Straight Up Films

I, Kalanidre, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Kalanidre (talk) 21:13, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

CCO Supplies Ltd

I, BizVidz99, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. BizVidz99 (talk) 00:10, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 00:40, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not done This is pretty unambiguously promotional and you'd have to completely re-write this to meet NPOV guidelines. For example, sentences like this are filled with PR WK:PUFFERY: " Since officially launching in 1988 from a small base in London, CCO supplies have become one of the UK's leading suppliers of IT products, computer consumables, stationery, office furniture, printers and printer products." I could e-mail you a copy of the article but I really think that you'd be better off starting from scratch. Given the article's tone I think that it's likely that you are either part of the company's marketing team or part of a PR company hired to write the article. If this is the case then you will need to read over the article at WP:COI and disclose this on your userpage. You will also need to be careful about how you phrase things since marketing people are used to writing in a promotional tone and as such, will be unlikely to pick up on promotional tones. I've known paid editors who scrutinized and continually re-wrote articles but missed obvious PR buzzwords because they were just that used to them. They had good intentions and really wanted to work with Wikipedia's guidelines, but just didn't see why they were being dinged as promotional. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:49, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HedgeSPA

I, 96.90.192.209, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 96.90.192.209 (talk) 02:05, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

motion (all types of motion)

please undelete my page i would work on it

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Ayush12gupta (talk) 08:55, 28 May 2015 (UTC) i would like to modify it and then establish it[reply]

I do not believe that A10 articles are undeleted here. Edit Motion (physics) instead of asking that this be undeleted. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 18:00, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not done This is an essay, not an article. You're welcome to contribute to the existing article instead, although you'll need references. Wikipedia is not a publisher, webhost or journal. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Festival Sherpa

The page was deleted because it had not been edited for the last six months. We received an update saying the page would be deleted if it wasn't edited soon and within 8 hours it was deleted before we could take any action, as we didn't have access to a laptop/pc or internet. Would request you to restore the page so we could edit it and send it back for review. Thanks guys. -122.170.104.249 (talk) 11:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 03:03, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bobby McKeown

I, Jamck, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jamck (talk) 12:23, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jamck: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:14, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Biola (brand)

Speedy deletion criteria was A7, G11. I dont agree, its a famous brand in Ukraine and Russia. It produces 170 million liters of water per year at plants in both countries. perhaps a detailed history of the plant was a mistake, I admit it. Was listed a list of brands, I believe it is necessary. Perhaps a detailed history of the plant was a mistake, I admit it. This is a great performance. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it.

There are also articles in Ukrainian, Russian and Norwegian. The company finances the famous football club Dnipro. -Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 13:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The page was deleted under speedy deletion criterion A7, indicating an article that did not explain or prove why the subject was notable. A7 deletions are not overturned here; try contacting the deleting administrator (Chrislk02 (talk · contribs)) instead. Neither the presence of a page on other Wikipediae or fame are enough to justify an article on en.wp; we require multiple third-party sources that discuss the subject in some depth. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jeff Ansell

We would like to edit this following the guidance received. We will add sources and remove unsubstantiated references. Many thanks for your help and guidance -Jaa.office (talk) 14:15, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Fixed report to point to correct title; remember that all page titles on Wikipedia are case-sensitive. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:52, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Jaa.office: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:08, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Davidausten/David Lloyd Austen

I, Davidausten, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Davidausten (talk) 14:46, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:01, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ricardo Alfonso Cerna

Please userfy both page and talk page -Valoem talk contrib 16:08, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nathan S. Bell

I, 68.62.57.36, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 68.62.57.36 (talk) 16:35, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This page has been deleted multiple times as an abandoned draft article. As Articles for creation, the Draft space, and user subpages are not to be used to indefinitely host material inappropriate for the encyclopedia, what exactly would you do to help make the draft get accepted as an article? —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 17:51, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Innovative leadership

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Mewoodan (talk) 18:31, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Mewoodan: Not done. This is thoroughly promotional – to the point where you'd be better off starting from scratch – but it also cannot be undeleted as it contained copyright violations from various places, such as here and here.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 21:59, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Dean Anthony Clairs

I, DantheInternut, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. DantheInternut (talk) 00:00, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DantheInternut: Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:06, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Jeremy Taylor (dreamworker)

Despite having not worked on this page for monhts, it is my intention to bring it up to standards and re-submit it for review and incorporation into Wikipedia. Please restore my draft. Thank you. -98.173.202.108 (talk) 02:01, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 02:04, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jane Goldenring

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) 2602:306:CFB0:D340:D101:CA4E:3594:4FE6 (talk) 04:49, 29 May 2015 (UTC) (This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) Jonnynomore (talk) 04:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jane Goldenring

Raise your profile

Hi,

Raise your profile is my company's name. We were founded in 2001. Can you please reinstate the page. I had included no details of services only the systems that were developed and are available to all UK charities free and on a 100% not for profit basis and then click the "Save page" button below -Ronnie Zahdeh 14:07, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Example

(This user used the preload form for AFC undeletion, but did not specify the name of the AFC draft they would like undeleted. Consider checking their deleted contributions.) EvoRoy (talk) 14:23, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Kingcbharati/King C Bharati

I, Kingcbharati, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. King C Bharati 15:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

I was not able to follow the instructions and by the time I got here the article was deleted -King C Bharati 15:12, 29 May 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingcbharati (talk • contribs)

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:21, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

irfan şahin

no spam -Libabom (talk) 19:35, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done Libabom, it looks like the page has been tagged with a BLP notice since it lacks reliable sources. If you add at least one reliable source then you can remove the PROD from the article. However this source must be in-depth and independent from Şahin. Coverage from a place that is affiliated with him would not be considered usable. I haven't searched, but given the claims there must be something out there. I will caution you that if you do not add enough sources to assert notability per WP:NBIO, the article can still be deleted via WP:AfD. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:10, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

17:11, 5 April 2015 Peridon (talk

I, Jandutaz, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Jandutaz (talk) 20:27, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Zen Project Management System

I think that my article should not be deleted, because it is part of a competition, which I must participate in. This competition is not about he best Wikipedia article, but about the software, which is treated from the article. I do not believe that that article is an advertisment. Why does Microsoft exist in Wikipedia then? -Iglimanaj (talk) 05:08, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done Articles deleted via WP:G11 will not be restored on Wikipedia and the article was very promotional. The features section is a good example of this, as referring to the reader as "you" and telling them about how useful the product will be comes across as promotional. This might have been unintentional on your part, but this is a fairly good example as to why people with a conflict of interest should not edit/create articles about something they're affiliated with. As far as it being part of a competition, that's not a good reason for inclusion either- and if anything, I'd highly recommend that you inform the contest holders that making Wikipedia a requirement for the contest is a very bad idea- especially if the contest is for new or obscure software that hasn't received enough coverage to pass notability guidelines. As for Microsoft having an article, their article is on Wikipedia because they pass notability guidelines for software. Saying that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not really a reason for inclusion since the article in question may pass notability guidelines in a way that this did not or could fail notability guidelines but just have not been detected yet. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:22, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2LiveCrew

File on Commons deleted, please restore here as FU. Thanks --Hedwig in Washington (TALK) 07:38, 30 May 2015 (UTC) -Hedwig in Washington (TALK) 07:38, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I guess it was a little too late yesterday nite. Sorry. File:2LiveCrew.JPG deleted on Commons copyvio/no fair use. Please restore and keep locally. Thanks! :) --Hedwig in Washington (TALK) 15:46, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:List of Australian Grammy Award winners

I, 202.161.23.86, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 202.161.23.86 (talk) 08:52, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:27, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hermann Erich Bauer.jpg

File has been transferred to Commons from en.wikipedia at 14:07, 25 May 2014 by Matanya. Now at Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hermann Erich Bauer.jpg nominated to be deleted per 'precautionary principle' for lacking vital GDFL information. -Poeticbent talk 20:30, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/William Eamon

I, Rebub, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Rebub (talk) 23:36, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Done - as an Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13, the page has been restored on request. Please edit the page to address the issues raised when it was declined, and re-submit it; "Articles for creation" is not for the indefinite hosting of material found to be unsuitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:57, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

William Eamon

Enter your reasoning here and then click the "Save page" button below -Rebub (talk) 23:38, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nguyễn Công Phượng

Article about a footballer who has since met the required notability standards. The article currently exists as Công Phượng but in my opinion the full name should be the article with content moved from the former as a redirect, or vise-versa. Thank You -Inter&anthro (talk) 15:41, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • This isn't really the right place to ask for this since you're not asking for a recreation- you're asking for us to unprotect the page. Since this went through two AfDs I'd prefer that you ask one of the closing admins (Spinningspark or Tone, both of whom I've linked to this discussion) to unprotect and move the page. Offhand it doesn't look like it'd be a problem, but I want to make sure that there's no stepping on toes. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:46, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Steven Naylor (composer)

I, AlexKall, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. AlexKall (talk) 17:40, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warren Millington

I feel that the deletion was either a mistake or misunderstanding by some one. All Data was correct -120.150.201.3 (talk) 21:20, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • @120.150.201.3: This was deleted because it was an article about a person that did not contain a reliable source that discussed Millington in depth. Even if the data is correct, all articles must have coverage via reliable sources that would help assert notability. If you can show a reliable source that is independent of Millington (or anyone affiliated with him) then I have no problem re-creating the article. However since it was deleted as a BLP prod we really can't restore it until you do this. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:49, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Bear on the Square Mountain Festival

I, Davemoser123, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Davemoser123 (talk) 00:00, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done Davemoser123, I was going to restore this but unfortunately the page is unambiguously promotional. WP:PEACOCK words like "picturesque", "finest", and "impressive" should not be in the article, nor should sentences like "Both bargains and fun can be found each year at the Bear on the Square Mountain Festival’s Artist Marketplace." I have no problem with you creating a new version of the article, but this was far too promotional to restore. It also doesn't help that it is a potential copyright violation since it takes content directly from this source. Even if you hold the copyright to this content and were willing to file a ticket at WP:ORTS to give permission to use it, you would still have to re-write it entirely to remove the promotional content- which is very promotional. Something I do have to warn you about is that Wikipedia is not here to promote an event (even if this was a secondary or unintentional goal) and that if you have a conflict of interest, you need to be very careful about this. (WP:COI) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:53, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Tim Henriques

I, 99.246.177.83, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. 99.246.177.83 (talk) 00:15, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done This was speedily deleted as WP:G11, unambiguous promotion, as well as WP:G13. Since it was tagged as such, this cannot be restored on Wikipedia. Your only real option here is to re-write the content from scratch. We could probably email you a copy of the article's history, but you would need to supply an e-mail for that. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rishabh_Puri

The page was deleted due to no reliable sources, whereas there were 3 reliable sources of newspaper articles and magazine article from reputed publishing houses from UAE http://www.saltnpeppa.me/dare-to-dream/ http://khaleejtimes.com/kt-article-display-1.asp?xfile=data/uaebusiness/2014/January/uaebusiness_January38.xml&section=uaebusiness http://www.masala.com/the-rising-star-rishabh-puri-40909.html-NGupta123 (talk) 06:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Not done NGupta123, those were listed under the external links and not placed as an inline citation. I did, however, still take a look at the links and this link to the Khaleej Times came up as "no page found". Salt n Peppa doesn't contain any information about its editorial process that Wikipedia could verify, so anything from that site would be considered unusable as a reliable source per Wikipedia's guidelines. This link to Masala.com came up as an error page, so it also couldn't be used as a reliable source. The site does have an editorial board so if you could provide a link to a live news article then that could probably be used as a RS.
However that aside, I also noticed that the article was pretty unambiguously promotional and at best it was written in an extremely non-neutral, casual tone akin to what you'd see on a blog or a Linkedin page. Sentences like "He enjoys learning new things, keeping own self busy, travelling to exotic locations and picking up new hobbies along the way." and "Challenges were indeed a paharder to prove capability and now it seems no challenge in business is too big! " don't fit within Wikipedia's WP:NPOV policy. They're too casual and as a result it comes across like pretty unambiguous promotion. It actually could have been speedy deleted under WP:G11 and I'm mildly surprised that it wasn't. Given that this was one of your first articles, I'd highly recommend that you use WP:AfC to create any future articles since this would give you more time to edit the article and you'd have the feedback of other editors prior to anything getting published. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:19, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Tokyogirl79, I have understood, and will try and a re-do to the article with live links of Masala Magazine and Khaleej Times newspaper. However, i have come across many articles which have 1 link to the source, but have written extensively about a person and as you mentioned, they were all unambiguously promotional and were written in casual tone. Why aren't they chosen for deletion ?--NGupta123 (talk) 08:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Tokyogirl79 Thank you for the tip. I surely will keep a look out for such articles, and will nominate the ones i have read in the past which fit into the criteria you mentioned. I still wonder why the article i wrote earlier was deleted, however at that time, the sources were verified, and its unfortunate that a website had a downlink. I don't see a reason to delete if the content was a bit casual, if a prior intimation was made i could have rectified it. The only reason mentioned was the sources were of external link, and i don't see why a newspaper or a reputable magazine would not fall in the criteria of verifiable source.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/UTAX (UK) Limited

I, Leah.bretti, request the undeletion of this Articles for creation submission deleted under CSD G13. Please restore the page as I intend to work on it. Leah.bretti (talk) 08:29, 1 June 2015 (UTC) ,[reply]

  • Not done Leah.bretti, there are portions of this article that come across like it was taken from a press release, so it's a little too promotional to restore. I'm also worried about potential copyright issues since it does read like it was cut/paste from somewhere else. I have no problem with you starting a new version at AfC, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:54, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I did some additional searching and it looks like portions were taken from this page, so it's likely that the rest was likely taken from somewhere else. Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text. You could file a ticket through WP:ORTS that gave permission to use the material but since it is taken from official sources (like press releases) it will be too promotional to leave on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:55, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion&oldid=664992982"