Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bumvertising and User talk:71.114.76.138: Difference between pages

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:25, 11 August 2006

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to User:Charcol Feather Summer. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to [[:User:Charcol Feather Summer]]. It is considered [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]]. If you would like to experiment, use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. <!-- Template:Test2-n (Second level warning) -->
-===[[Bumvertising]]===
-This is an advertisement. Well, actually a hoax that leads to an advertisement [[User:216.35.131.141|216.35.131.141]] 14:53, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
-*'''Keep''' As the original author of the article, I started it after seeing numerous mentions in the media - TV and national newspapers.  It's certainly no hoax.  Nor is it an advertisement, it's a method of advertisement.  I specifically avoided linking to or highlighting the products/inventor of the term.  [[User:SchmuckyTheCat|SchmuckyTheCat]] 15:37, 26 August 2005 (UTC)
-*'''Keep''' [[User:Idleguy|Idleguy]] 18:11, August 26, 2005 (UTC)
-*'''Weak keep''' The major news media have decreed "It's Noteworthy". And, no, I don't think this page is an ad. [[User:Nowhither|Nowhither]] 06:52, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
-*'''Keep''' Not an ad or a hoax. Has been getting major press in [[Los Angeles]]. [[User:Sean Bonner|Sean Bonner]] 00:18, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
-*Keep. Like Sean said. {{unsigned|Ospheric|22:05, 30 August 2005 (UTC)}}
-*'''Delete'''. Advertising. [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] 03:58, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
-*'''Weak Keep'''. The article was clearly used to contribute to the promotion of the publicity campaign, but it has attracted media notice from reputable outlets. I have cleaned up the article to put the campaign into a little more context and added a couple of references. [[User:Dystopos|Dystopos]] 04:39, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
-*'''Strong Keep'''. This was not added by the inventor of the subject whom I happen to know personally. (Nor did I add this article). The article was added by an anonymous wiki-enthusiast, thus showing that the term is in fact widespread. With all of the media buzz this topic has been receiving, I wouldn't be surprised to see the term used more frequently within the English language vernacular.