User talk:Andjam/Archive2: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:02, 24 August 2006

Archives:

User talk:Andjam/Speedy1 - I read all user talk messages, but especially enjoy the vicious ones and refractor them to a page of their own.

Gasp! I didn't mean to archive the page so as to remove me from it. Adam 12:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

SoCalJustice

In this case the evidence is incontrovertible. Jayjg ^(talk) 14:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Who is the real "SoCalJustice"? Have they asked to contribute? Jayjg ^(talk) 14:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really sure what should be done, as it's a pseudonym, not a real name. The real SoCalJustice could simply edit under a different name, I suppose, if he wanted to. I'm not sure how he'd prove he was the "real" SoCalJustice either. Also, I don't think these things are ever done on behalf of other editors, or "just in case". Jayjg ^(talk) 05:18, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weird autoblock

I've been the victim of an autoblock, but I'm not at the IP affected by the autoblock.

It says that I've got an IP of 66.230.200.195 , but my IP doesn't even start with the same number. The admin is Sango123, and the reasoning is "Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "067970327". The reason given for 067970327's block is: "user..."."

It's after midnight, so I should get to bed, and hopefully this'll clear up without having to be unblocked. I'd rather not be unblocked, because that means that I've been blocked in the first place, if that makes sense ... Andjam 14:24, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

same happened to me, and many others. My IP is in the 86.128.0.0 - 86.135.255.255 range (BT in the UK, as are most/all of the ones I've seen affected; all were seeing 66.x.x.x has been autoblocked); it looks like something somewhere blocked the wrong range, or something. Ah well, it all seems OK now! Tonywalton | Talk 14:38, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, and all the people I've talked to have seen a 66.x.x.x address instead of their own. I guess the fact you sucessfully put a post on my talkpage shows that you've been unblocked, along with the rest of us! Put it down to the Wiki having a brainfart, I reckon. I'd go and sleep on it, if I were you. Me, I'm off down the pub ;-) Cheers, Tonywalton | Talk 14:47, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cynna Kydd

Perhaps you ought to familiarise yourself with WP:NPA before you go stamping further boilerplates on talk pages. Rebecca has not violated policy in the edit you refer to. Thanks, --cj | talk 17:02, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 :same happened to me, and many others. My IP is in the 86.128.0.0 - 86.135.255.255 range (BT in the UK, as are most/all of the ones I've seen affected; all were seeing 66.x.x.x has been autoblocked); it looks like something somewhere blocked the wrong range, or something. Ah well, it all seems OK now!  [[User:Tonywalton|Tonywalton]] &nbsp;|<small> [[User talk:Tonywalton|Talk]]</small> 14:38, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
 :Yup, and all the people I've talked to have seen a 66.x.x.x address instead of their own. I guess the fact you sucessfully put a post on my talkpage shows that you've been unblocked, along with the rest of us! Put it down to the Wiki having a brainfart, I reckon. I'd go and sleep on it, if I were you. Me, I'm off down the pub  ;-)  Cheers, [[User:Tonywalton|Tonywalton]] &nbsp;|<small> [[User talk:Tonywalton|Talk]]</small> 14:47, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
+==Re: Cynna Kydd==
+Perhaps you ought to familiarise yourself with [[WP:NPA]] before you go stamping further boilerplates on talk pages. Rebecca has not violated policy in the edit you refer to. Thanks, --[[User:Cyberjunkie|cj]] | [[User talk:Cyberjunkie|talk]] 17:02, 24 August 2006 (UTC)