Jump to content

Barium chromate and User:Akradecki/Sandbox: Difference between pages

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Difference between pages)
Content deleted Content added
 
Akradecki (talk | contribs)
m ESA concepts: bracket
 
Line 1: Line 1:
'''''This page is part of my Userpage, and exists for developing drafts of articles. If you came here as the result of a Google search, please be aware that the information here is draft material only. If what you are looking for is not here, it is probable that it has been put into its final encyclopedia article form. Please use the search box to the left to find it.'''''
<!--[[Image:]]-->
{| border="1" cellpadding="2" cellspacing="0" width="275px" align="right" style="border-collapse:collapse; margin-left: 10px;"
|-
|bgcolor="#ffffff" align="center" colspan=2|
|-
|align="center" colspan="2" |
<font size="-1">''Barium Chromate''</font>
|- align="center" style="border-bottom: 3px solid gray"
| '''[[CAS number]]''' <br/> [10294-40-3]
| '''[[ATC code]]''' <br/>
|-
|bgcolor="#efefef"|[[Chemical formula]]
|bgcolor="#dfefff"|BaCrO<sub>4</sub>
|-
|bgcolor="#efefef"|[[Molecular weight]]
|bgcolor="#dfefff"|
|-
|bgcolor="#efefef"|[[Specific gravity]]
|bgcolor="#dfefff"|
|-
|bgcolor="#efefef"|[[Bioavailability]]
|bgcolor="#dfefff"|
|-
|bgcolor="#efefef"|[[Melting point]]
|bgcolor="#dfefff"|
|-
|bgcolor="#efefef"|[[Density]]
|bgcolor="#dfefff"|
|-
|bgcolor="#efefef"|[[Solubility]] in [[Water (molecule)|water]]
|bgcolor="#dfefff"|
|-
|bgcolor="#efefef"|[[RTECS number]]
|bgcolor="#dfefff"|
|-
|}
'''[[Barium]] chromate''' (or '''barium chromate oxide''' or '''chromic acid barium''') is a fine light yellow powder with the formula BaCr0<sub>4</sub>. It is very [[Solubility|insoluble]] in [[water]].


==CRV==
==External sources==
[[http://www.espi-metals.com/msds's/bariumchromate.pdf#search=%22barium%20chromate%22]]
<br>
{{ChemicalSources}}


==ESA concepts==
[[Category:Barium compounds]]
As a part of their wide ranging studies of potential manned spaceflight programs, the ESA began a 6-month first phase ACRV study in October, 1992. Prime contractors for the study were Aerospatiale, Alenia Spazio and Deutsche Aerospace.<ref name="esa1">[http://www.friends-partners.org/partners/mwade/craft/esaacrv.htm ESA ACRV review]</ref>
[[Category:Chromates]]


The ESA studied several concepts for a CRV:
{{inorganic-compound-stub}}
*Apollo-type capsule: This would have been a scaled-up version of the 1960s Apollo capsule, capable of carrying eight astronauts. A tower that sat on top of the capsule would contain a docking tunnel as well as the capsule's rocket engines, again similar to the Apollo configuration. The tower would be jettisoned just before re-entry. Landing would be via decelleration parachutes and air bags.<ref name="esa1"/>
*Also during Phase 1 studies the ESA looked at a conical capsule known as the "Viking". Like the Apollo-style, it would have reentered base first, but it had a more aerodynamic shape. The rocket engines for the "Viking" module were derivatives of the Ariane Transfer Vehicle. The design work continued until the end of Phase 1 in March, 1995.<ref name="esa1"/>
*A Blunt Biconic concept was studied in 1993 - 1994. This design was expected to be more maneuverable, but would have been heavier and more expensive.<ref name="esa1"/>


==References==
Molecular weight is 253.988g
<references/>

==External links==

*Soyuz CRV [http://www.geocities.com/i_s_s_alpha/2004.htm]
*soyuz [http://www.energia.ru/english/energia/iss/soyuz-tma/soyuz-tma.html]
*eas [http://www.fas.org/spp/guide/europe/piloted/index.html]
*nasa crv controls paper [http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/_techrep/TM-2000-208925.pdf]
*Overview [http://www.globalsecurity.org/space/systems/x-38.htm]
*nasa info [http://nix2.larc.nasa.gov/info?id=EC00-0147-21&orgid=7]
*old stuff [http://www.friends-partners.org/partners/mwade/craft/nasaacrv.htm]
*apollo type [http://www.friends-partners.org/partners/mwade/craft/esaacrv.htm]
*thermal issues [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993STIA...9591635B]
*capsule concept [http://www.house.gov/science/hearings/space03/may08/myers.htm]
*ACRV abstract [http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1992STIN...9312910.]
*ESA [http://www.esa.int/esaHS/ESARZS0VMOC_iss_0.html]
*nasa educ brief [http://virtualastronaut.jsc.nasa.gov/teacherportal/pdfs/CrewReturnVehicleX38.pdf]
*old page from Answers [http://www.answers.com/topic/crew-return-vehicle]
*nasa tech [http://www.nasatech.com/Briefs/July99/DRC9890.html]
*historic info [http://www.abo.fi/~mlindroo/Station/Slides/sld052.htm]
*Pioneer aerospace chute [http://www.pioneeraero.com/1-4_int_spa.htm]
*all experts [http://experts.about.com/e/c/cr/Crew_Return_Vehicle.htm]
*CRV interior / nasa [http://www1.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Photo/X-38/HTML/EC99-45255-26.html]
*Audit report [http://oig.nasa.gov/audits/reports/FY99/pdfs/ig-99-036r.pdf]
*another [http://oig.nasa.gov/audits/reports/FY00/pdfs/ig-00-005.pdf]
*Encycl of astrobiology [http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/A/ACRV.html]
*JSC [http://www.pubs.asce.org/WWWdisplay.cgi?9603128]
*find tech briefs [http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3957/is_199907/ai_n8859390]
*Propulsion sys [http://www.nasa.gov/centers/marshall/pdf/100394main_X-38.pdf]
*Synth cockpit windows [http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=778599]
*Abstract [http://csdl2.computer.org/persagen/DLAbsToc.jsp?resourcePath=/dl/proceedings/&toc=comp/proceedings/rtas/1999/0194/00/0194toc.xml&DOI=10.1109/RTTAS.1999.777678]
*3d modeling for CRV design [http://www.capture3d.com/case_quality_X38.htm]
*cost overruns [http://aip.org/fyi/2001/103.html]
*timinig analysis [http://www.isso.uh.edu/publications/A2004/04-cheng2.htm]
*house funding [http://www.house.gov/science/li_06-24.htm]
*interior design paper [http://pdf.aiaa.org/preview/CDReadyMSPA03_776/PV2003_6354.pdf]
*house termination information [http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ocga/Laws/PL107_73.asp]
*house info [http://www.aaas.org/spp/rd/nasa02h.pdf]
*NOVA info [http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/station/vehicle.html]
*ESA white paper [http://esapub.esrin.esa.it/bulletin/bullet101/graf.pdf]
*political comments about cancelation [http://www.space.com/spacenews/archive03/planearch_052003.html]
*msnbc flash presentation [http://www.msnbc.com/modules/space_station_timeline/space_station_timeline.swf]
*ACRV slide [http://www.abo.fi/~mlindroo/Station/Slides/tsld052.htm]
*cockpit [http://spiedl.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=PSISDG004023000001000063000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes]
*revival talk [http://www.geocities.com/spacetransport/x38.html]
*ACRV patent [http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/ABSTRACTS/GPN-2000-000180.html], [http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5064151.html]
*medical aspects [http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:Dmmt0Gca92oJ:arc.cs.odu.edu:8080/dp9/getrecord/oai_dc/ntrs.nasa.gov/oai:JTRS:TM-2001-210198+assured+crew+return+vehicle&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=14]
*soyuz [http://www.aiaa.org/content.cfm?pageid=406&gTable=mtgpaper&gID=75076]
*Soyuz [http://www.issfanclub.com/node/2458]
*historic [http://www.astronautix.com/craftfam/rescue.htm]
*political on cancellation [http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=9609]
*house info [http://www.house.gov/science/hearings/space03/may08/gregory.htm]
*medical [http://ston.jsc.nasa.gov/collections/TRS/_techrep/TM-2001-210198.pdf]
*nasa [http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19920000943_1992000943.pdf]
*soyuz [http://asia.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=4672]
*GAO report [http://archive.gao.gov/t2pbat3/151975.pdf]
*goals [http://www.hq.nasa.gov/osf/2003/yearinrev/03ISS.html]

==X-38==
*Space.com [http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/technology/x38_test_001102.html]
*nasa chute [http://spaceflight.nasa.gov/history/station/x38/parafoil.html]
*test flight [http://www.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/news/NewsReleases/1999/99-07_pf.html]
*flight tests [http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=5341]
*flight test vehicle [http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=2182]
*#2 freeflight [http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/ABSTRACTS/GPN-2000-000192.html]
*flight test [http://www1.nasa.gov/centers/dryden/news/NewsReleases/1999/99-02.html]
*X-38 image on commons [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:ISS_Crew_Return_Vehicle.jpg]
*1st test flight [http://www.pbs.org/spacestation/image_copy/series/lifeboat.htm]
*test flight [http://www.army-technology.com/contractors/logistics/pioneer/pioneer3.html]
*test flight [http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/ABSTRACTS/GPN-2000-000180.html]


==General Atomics==

[http://www.uav.com/news/press_releases.php GA Press releases]

==UAV References==
*[http://www.fas.org/irp/agency/army/tradoc/usaic/mipb/1996-3/wilson.htm Eyes in the sky: Aerial Systems]

Revision as of 02:52, 23 October 2006

This page is part of my Userpage, and exists for developing drafts of articles. If you came here as the result of a Google search, please be aware that the information here is draft material only. If what you are looking for is not here, it is probable that it has been put into its final encyclopedia article form. Please use the search box to the left to find it.

CRV

ESA concepts

As a part of their wide ranging studies of potential manned spaceflight programs, the ESA began a 6-month first phase ACRV study in October, 1992. Prime contractors for the study were Aerospatiale, Alenia Spazio and Deutsche Aerospace.[1]

The ESA studied several concepts for a CRV:

  • Apollo-type capsule: This would have been a scaled-up version of the 1960s Apollo capsule, capable of carrying eight astronauts. A tower that sat on top of the capsule would contain a docking tunnel as well as the capsule's rocket engines, again similar to the Apollo configuration. The tower would be jettisoned just before re-entry. Landing would be via decelleration parachutes and air bags.[1]
  • Also during Phase 1 studies the ESA looked at a conical capsule known as the "Viking". Like the Apollo-style, it would have reentered base first, but it had a more aerodynamic shape. The rocket engines for the "Viking" module were derivatives of the Ariane Transfer Vehicle. The design work continued until the end of Phase 1 in March, 1995.[1]
  • A Blunt Biconic concept was studied in 1993 - 1994. This design was expected to be more maneuverable, but would have been heavier and more expensive.[1]

References

X-38


General Atomics

GA Press releases

UAV References