Dodge Tomahawk: Difference between revisions
m Reverted 1 edit by 83.123.19.75 (talk) to last revision by TKOIII (TW) |
If any editor ever needs a perfect example of UNDUE WEIGHT, they only have to link to the previous version of this article. |
||
| Line 78: | Line 78: | ||
[[File:Dodge Tomahawk museum.jpg|thumb|Stainless steel rear cowl and top of Tomahawk, with handlebars connected to a vertical stalk. At the [[Walter P. Chrysler Museum]], Michigan.]] |
[[File:Dodge Tomahawk museum.jpg|thumb|Stainless steel rear cowl and top of Tomahawk, with handlebars connected to a vertical stalk. At the [[Walter P. Chrysler Museum]], Michigan.]] |
||
As introduced in 2003, the one-of-a-kind Tomahawk was operational and road-ready, but not fully road-tested, and acceleration and top speed were not confirmed; Dodge described the vehicle both as "automotive sculpture," intended for display only, and as "rideable".<ref name=Lienert /><ref name=2003PressRelease/> A request from one publication to test the Tomahawk's performance was refused, and Dodge declined the same publication's request to interview the company's test riders, or to relay their riding impressions.<ref name=PopSci /> |
As introduced in 2003, the one-of-a-kind Tomahawk was operational and road-ready, but not fully road-tested, and acceleration and top speed were not confirmed; Dodge described the vehicle both as "automotive sculpture," intended for display only, and as "rideable".<ref name=Lienert /><ref name=2003PressRelease/> A request from one publication to test the Tomahawk's performance was refused, and Dodge declined the same publication's request to interview the company's test riders, or to relay their riding impressions.<ref name=PopSci /> |
||
===Top speed=== |
|||
<!-- Expressed no skepticism of speed: <ref name=AutoWeekRumble2/> --> |
|||
Speculation about the Tomahawk's top speed came from the media, and within DaimlerChrysler. One Dodge representative said, "If a 3,400-pound Viper goes 190, this'll go 400, easy."<ref name=Phillips2003/> Senior designer Walters, who was in charge of the Tomahawk project, said he did not believe published speeds of 400 mph were possible, noting that the bike was geared for acceleration, and if geared for speed, {{Convert|250|mph|abbr=on}} would be within reach.<ref name="designnews"/> |
|||
''[[Car and Driver]]'', though enthusiastic over "arguably the oddest, coolest, most over-the-top concept ever", expressed "doubt that anyone has actually tried" reaching 60 mph in 2.5 seconds, "or its estimated top speed of 300-plus mph."<ref name=Kiino2003/> Phil Patton of ''[[The New York Times]]'' wrote, "In theory, the Tomahawk can blast from a standing start to 60 miles an hour in two and a half seconds and reach 300 miles an hour. In practice, since [[Evel Knievel]] retired, it's hard to imagine anyone willing to prove it."<ref name=Patton/> ''[[Cycle World]]''{{'}}s John Phillips derided the top speed claims by stating that at the [[Detroit Auto Show]], "Cadillac unveiled its own paean to one-upmanship a mere 50 yards away—a luxo sedan with a V-16 producing ''1000 bhp''. Twice the Tomahawk's output. Which means—at least by Dodge's amusingly convoluted logic—that Caddy's engine could propel the bike to ''800'' mph."<ref name=Phillips2003/> |
|||
===Dodge's changing claims=== |
|||
''[[Popular Science]]'' said Dodge initially announced the top speed of the Tomahawk was estimated at {{Convert|420|mph|abbr=on}}, but later revised this downward to {{Convert|300|mph|abbr=on}}, and spokesmen did not answer questions on how this estimate was calculated.<ref name=PopSci/> ''[[Motorcycle Consumer News]]'' reported that the two conflicting figures, 300 and 420 mph were actually released simultaneously by Dodge, "on the same press page".<ref name=Kerr2003/> The January 6, 2003 press release from Dodge announcing the Tomahawk and listing the specifications said it had "a potential top speed of nearly 400 miles per hour" and also said "PERFORMANCE: 0-60 mph: 2.5 seconds (est.) Top Speed: 300+ mph (est.)".<ref name=2003PressRelease/> It also said, "It is both a sculpture that can be ridden, as well as a bold statement about the Chrysler Group's enthusiast culture and passion for design."<ref name=2003PressRelease/> Later press releases, in 2006 and in 2009, repeated the phrase "a potential top speed of nearly 400 miles per hour".<ref name=2006PressRelease/><ref name=2009PressRelease/> |
|||
===Aerodynamic considerations=== |
|||
Jeff Karr, in ''[[Motorcyclist (magazine)|Motorcyclist]]'' magazine, agreed with Walters that perhaps {{convert|250|mph|abbr=on}} was conceivable, according to rough calculations suggesting that motorcycles with far less drag, like the [[Suzuki Hayabusa]] and [[Kawasaki ZX-12R]] would need on the order of 460 hp to reach only 300 mph, and so the Tomahawk, with at least 50% more drag than those bikes, would have to have at least 700 hp to attain even 300 mph, given that [[Drag (physics)|drag increases as the square of speed]].<ref name=Karr2003/> Without protection from wind blast and a secure riding position, however, approaching a speed like 250 mph, or even 200 mph, would be unsafe due to the instability of the design and the lack of any provision to prevent [[Lift (force)|aerodynamic lift]] from pulling the rider off the seat.<ref name=PopSci/><ref name=Phillips2003/><ref name=Karr2003/> [[Dave Campos]], [[motorcycle land speed record]] rider, doubted the Tomahawk could reach {{Convert|200|mph|abbr=on}} because at high speeds, the rider would be "lifted right off the bike" without a [[Motorcycle fairing|fairing]], and the four-wheel steering could also be a problem.<ref name=PopSci/> |
|||
Joe Teresi of ''[[Easyriders]]'' magazine, owner of Campos' record-setting [[streamliner]] motorcycle, said the top speed estimate must have been based only on [[horsepower]] and [[final drive ratio]], and ignored the "critical factors" of [[Automobile drag coefficient|frontal area]], [[drag coefficient]], and [[rolling resistance]].<ref name=PopSci/> |
|||
===Testing=== |
|||
Dodge spokesman David Elshoff said that Tomahawk would someday be taken for a run at the [[Bonneville Speedway]],<ref name=PopSci/> but no such attempt was ever made. |
|||
Chrysler's chief operating officer Wolfgang Bernhard said in 2003 that no one had ridden the Tomahawk faster than {{Convert|100|mph|abbr=on}}.<ref name= Mateja/> |
|||
Dodge declined offers to put the top speed claim to a test or to allow testing with a [[dynamometer]] that can simulate a top speed test, and no one is known to have attempted to ride the Tomahawk to its maximum speed.<ref name=Lienert/><ref name=PopSci/><ref name=Runk/> |
|||
==Critical reception== |
|||
Most motorcycling, automotive, and science press greeted the Tomahawk with jokes and sarcasm [[Roast (comedy)|roasting]] the Tomahawk, such as ''AutoWeek'' suggesting anyone riding the Tomahawk was a [[Darwin Awards|Darwin Award]] contender,<ref name=AutoweekButWait/> and a 2015 book calling it "the strangest" of the 2003 Dodge vehicles and "one of Chrysler's nuttiest concepts".<ref>{{citation | title=Dodge Dynamite! | author=Peter Grist | publisher=Veloce | year=2015 | isbn=1845848233 | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=20FuBgAAQBAJ&pg=PT394}}</ref><!-- also repeats 420 mph "theoretical" top speed--> Freelance [[motorcycle design]]er and ''[[Motorcycle Consumer News]]'' columnist [[Glynn Kerr]], however, wrote an analysis that took it seriously and critiqued it as he would a "real" motorcycle.<ref name=Kerr2003/> Kerr described the top speed claims from Dodge as the work of "[[spin doctor]]s", but said that the "less than convincing" "high-speed antics", combined with the failure to provide an obvious necessity of a fairing for a true high-speed motorcycle, or a fuel tank large enough to provide greater than {{Convert|50|mi|abbr=on}} range, were consistent with several indicators in the design of carelessness and laziness. Kerr called to task the car designers for a lack of curiosity about the basic tenets of motorcycle design, saying they were "underwhelmed" by the challenge.<ref name=Kerr2003/> He said the Tomahawk "illustrates how the automotive industry considers motorcycles a lesser form of its own discipline" and so "feel entirely qualified to redesign one whenever they run out of ideas for sports cars."<ref name=Kerr2003/> |
|||
[[File:Morbidelli V8 at Barber Motorsport Museum.jpg|thumb|[[Morbidelli|Morbidelli V8]] design was criticized by Glynn Kerr, like the Tomahawk's, for ignoring motorcycle-specific design rules]] |
|||
Kerr blamed this disregard of the rules of motorcycle design for the use of "too much over-simplified bodywork" on the [[Pininfarina]] [[Morbidelli|Morbidelli V8]], which the Tomahawk at least avoided, while still "missing the point about bikes."<ref name=Kerr2003/> The indecision between making a [[sport bike]] or [[cruiser (motorcycle)|cruiser]] led to the uncomfortable ergonomics of a [[Motorcycle drag racing|dragster motorcycle]], but it did not matter because the Tomahawk was "not intended to be taken seriously", notwithstanding the intention to produce a limited production run.<ref name=Kerr2003/> While he found the basic shape "not unpleasant", the unseriousness led to an unfinished result, pointing out the lack of harmonization in the twin ram-air intakes, and the "incongruous" use of a [[Retro style|retro]] single vertical stalk planted in the fuel tank in an otherwise futuristic design.<ref name=Kerr2003/> Kerr acknowledges that DaimlerChrysler does not "give a damn" about the motorcycle industry point of view, because the Tomahawk was successful in its real purpose, "creating an almighty furor within the automotive world."<ref name=Kerr2003/> |
|||
''[[Motorcyclist (magazine)|Motorcyclist]]'s'' Jeff Karr speculated the boredom with having designed too many outlandish show cars, especially with DaimlerChrysler's history of doing the unexpected, made the designers want to do this for "the sheer outrage of the exercise", creating "a machine so resolutely evil, it has chunks of [[Yamaha V-Max|V-Max]] in its stool", "the ultimate bad-ass ride."<ref name=Karr2003/> Karr was positive about the "simultaneously futuristic and nostalgic" appearance where Glynn Kerr saw indecisiveness.<ref name=Kerr2003/><ref name=Karr2003/> |
|||
In response to automotive writer Stephan Wilkinson's suggestion that the Tomahawk was "essentially worthless" as a "usable vehicle", [[Design Continuum]]'s Alan Mudd disagreed.<ref name=Wilkinson2005/> Mudd said it "showed the public that Chrysler is made up of a bunch of passionate people. Even if it is a total adolescent wet dream, it has value because it tells the consumer that Chrysler is full of excited, creative people who just want to try some great new stuff."<ref name=Wilkinson2005/> Lars Erik Lundin of [[Volvo]]'s Concept Center in California said, "there's absolutely no risk that Volvo would ever do such craziness", adding that such flights of fancy "raise people's expectations", noting that Volvo showed a [[hybrid car]] in 1992 yet failed to deliver one even 12 years later.<ref name=Wilkinson2005/> GM designer and automotive columnist [[Robert Cumberford]] agreed that leaving consumers disappointed is a risk, noting that the public loved the [[Range Stormer]] concept, creating a panic at [[Land Rover]] when they had nothing as "zoomy" to sell.<ref name=Wilkinson2005/> Wilkinson said that concept cars serve less today as platforms to introduce new technology, such as power windows, LED lights, voice controls, or traffic display screens, and are instead more marketing tools and styling exercises.<ref name=Wilkinson2005/> |
|||
The ''[[New York Times]]'' asked various auto industry luminaries to pick the standouts among their competitors at the 2003 Detroit Auto Show, including Jin Kim of [[Toyota]]'s [[Calty Design Research]], who picked the Cadillac Sixteen, the [[Dodge Kahuna]], and the Tomahawk, saying, "Just the fact that they had the guts to put that thing on the turntable, you've got to give them credit. It's almost an icon of American automotive history, the raw power and sheer adrenaline. The whole thing looked like it was machined, milled out of a raw block of metal. It looked like something you would see in a futuristic movie."<ref name=Jensen2003/> [[Ford]]'s Camilo Pardo, Chief Designer of the [[Ford GT]], also chose the Sixteen, and the Tomahawk, saying, "I'd like to give them a lot of credit for experimenting with a vehicle completely outside their categories. It was brave, and I thought the execution was really well done, very mature. It's a beautiful piece, and I'd love to have it sitting in a living room as a piece of art."<ref name=Jensen2003/> [[Hyundai-Kia]]'s [[Eric Stoddard]] agreed that "[t]hey are presenting the idea that they are not afraid to try anything, even a V-10 Viper-powered motorcycle."<ref name=Jensen2003/> |
|||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Revision as of 22:42, 5 December 2019
| Manufacturer | Dodge |
|---|---|
| Parent company | DaimlerChrysler AG |
| Production | 9 units total, 2003–2006[1][2] |
| Class | Concept vehicle |
| Engine | 8.3 L (506.5 cu in) 20-valve 90° V-10[3] |
| Power | 500 hp (370 kW) @ 5600 rpm (claimed)[3] (45 kW:L power:displacement ratio) |
| Torque | 525 lb⋅ft (712 N⋅m)[3] |
| Transmission | 2-speed manual[3] |
| Suspension | Front: Horizontal double fork[3] |
| Brakes | Front: 2×16 piston discs, Rear: 8 piston disc[3] |
| Tires | Front (2): 20"×4", Rear (2): 20"×5" |
| Wheelbase | 76 in (1,900 mm)[3] |
| Dimensions | L: 102 in (2,600 mm)[3] W: 27.7 in (700 mm) H: 36.9 in (940 mm) |
| Seat height | 29 in (740 mm) |
| Weight | 1,500 lb (680 kg) (claimed)[3] (wet) |
| Fuel capacity | 3.35 US gal (12.7 L; 2.79 imp gal) |
The Dodge Tomahawk was a non–street legal concept vehicle introduced by Dodge at the 2003 North American International Auto Show. The Tomahawk attracted significant press and industry attention for its striking design, its use of a large-capacity 10-cylinder automobile engine, and its four close-coupled wheels, which gave a motorcycle-like appearance, and fueled debate on whether it was or was not actually a motorcycle.[4] The Retro-Art Deco design's central visual element is the 500-horsepower (370 kW), 8.3-litre (510 cu in) V10 SRT10 engine from the Dodge Viper.[5] The vehicle has two front wheels and two rear wheels, which are sprung independently and theoretically allow it to lean into corners and countersteer like a motorcycle.[3]
Dodge's claims of a hypothetical top speed of 300 to 420 miles per hour (480 to 680 km/h), probably based on horsepower and gearing calculations, were debunked by the motorcycling and automotive media. No road tests of the Tomahawk have ever been published.[3][4][6] Hand-built replicas of the Tomahawk were offered for sale through the Neiman Marcus catalog at a price of US$555,000, and up to nine might have sold.[1][2] As they were not street legal, Dodge called the Tomahawk a "rolling sculpture", which was not intended to be ridden.[1][3]
The Tomahawk was a resounding success in its true purpose: to generate media buzz, and send the message that Chrysler was a bold, ambitious company, unafraid to take risks.[7][8]
Inception
The idea for a Viper-engined motorcycle started with two lower-level Chrysler Group employees, Bob Schroeder, a design office modeler and motorcycle rider, and Dave Chyz, vehicle build specialist and drag racer.[5][9] According to designer Mark Walters, himself not a "motorcycle guy", the question asked was, "What if we had a Viper engine and a Champion chassis? Something like a Boss Hoss."[9] Schroeder and Chyz took the proposal to Senior Vice President of Design Trevor Creed, who initially said, "we don't build bikes" but still allowed some design sketches to be created, which were "mind blowing" enough to bring Creed on board.[9] They eventually took the idea to Freeman Thomas, DaimlerChrysler VP of advanced design, who assigned Walters to join the effort.[5] Thomas suggested using two front and rear wheels because a single wheel would look thin next to the unusually wide engine, inspired by the four-wheeled light cycles in the film Tron.[5][9] Walters anticipated howls from bikers that this would make it not a motorcycle, but he felt uniqueness was more important, and imagined the appearance with only a single wheel in front of and behind the engine would have been visually unbalanced, saying he would like to see it made that way for comparison.[9] By the spring of 2002, Walters had prepared a full scale design presentation, with sketches along a 20 ft (6.1 m) wall and a borrowed Viper engine resting on an engine stand with two wheels placed fore and aft as a visual aid. This was presented to Chrysler Group COO, Wolfgang Bernhard, and CEO, Dieter Zetsche, who gave their immediate approval.[5][9]
Design
The design was the work of Chrysler staff designer Mark Walters, who built the vehicle around the Dodge Viper 8.3-litre (510 cu in) V-10 engine.[5] Once approved by Bernhard and Zetsche to build not just a full-scale mockup, but a running, workable concept vehicle, the design and fabrication process took six months.[9] The engineering, as well as the fabrication, was outsourced to RM Motorsports, a Wixom, Michigan specialty shop that fabricates one-of-a-kind parts for rare and vintage race cars.[4][9] Walters said Kirt Bennett at RM handled the task of making Walters' sketches a physical reality that was mechanically sound.[9] Walters' early sketches had a front suspension that looked something like an Elf-Honda racing motorcycle's hub-center steering, from which RM designed a new, patented front- and rear-swingarm suspension that allows both parallel wheels to lean together, keeping all four in contact with the ground and allowing countersteering.[9] The Tomahawk was intended, unlike many concept vehicles, to be a "functional runner" that "had to work" as well as have a finished appearance, since the mechanical parts would be exposed to view.[9]
The V-10 engine needed several design changes. To position the engine lower to the ground, the lubrication system was changed from wet sump to a dry sump type, moving the under-engine oil sump to a tank located in front of and to the left of the engine.[9] The car-style single radiator out in front of the engine was changed to two smaller radiators and fitted into the V-shaped space above the engine, where cooling air is force-fed using a belt-driven fan sourced from a Porsche 911.[9]
Suspension
The Tomahawk has an independent suspension on all four wheels designed to allow the rider to countersteer and lean into turns like a tilting three-wheeler.[3] There is a hub-center steering style swingarm connected to the outboard side of each of the two front wheels, with a steering link connected to the handlebar shaft.[9] There is very little lock-to-lock steering range, only about 20° on either side of center, so the turning radius of the Tomahawk is large; "only a little tighter than an SR-71", said Motorcyclist's Jeff Karr.[9] A low center of gravity, accomplished by situating the engine as low to ground as possible, is intended to provide greater control at low speeds, and a low saddle allows riders to place both feet on the ground when stopped, for greater stability.[5] The two rear wheels also each have an independent swingarm, but on the inboard side, along with an inboard chain drive for each wheel.[9] The rider can engage a rear suspension lock, which hydraulically holds the two wheels' relative positions, letting the vehicle stand on its own, without using a side stand.[3][9]
According to computer imaging, the suspension would allow a lean of up to 45° with all four wheels maintaining contact with the ground before one of the swingarms contacted the ground, although attempting to actually corner at such extreme angles is not safe given the Tomahawk's 1,500 lb weight.[9] Test rides for the purpose of photographing the Tomahawk in action revealed that there were still stability issues to be worked out, given that it rides, "like two motorcycles riding in ultraclose formation, coupled with the weight of three and the horsepower of four," in Karr's words, meaning that, "some disagreement is inevitable."[9]
Fabrication
Bennett's team at RM custom-milled the Tomahawk components from blocks of aluminum.[3] Under the seat are two alloy pieces that began as 750 lb (340 kg) billets that are machined down to 25 lb (11 kg) each, and polished to a mirror finish.[9] Details like hand levers and the twistgrip use needle and ball bearings.[9]
Detroit Auto Show debut
The Tomahawk debuted at what Automobile Magazine called the high point of a period of increasing extravagance at the Cobo Hall Detroit Auto Show (officially the North American International Auto Show) that began with the expansion of the show in 1986–1987, leading to the splashy debuts of ever larger and more powerful cars and trucks, such as the Hummer H2 in 2000 and the Ford GT40 in 2002.[10] Newsweek described the period as a "horsepower arms race".[11]
The 2003 show had the largest ever attendance, 810,699, and the limits of concept excess were pushed further with the 7.0L V-10 Ford 427 Concept, which had a V-8 hastily expanded to 10 cylinders in response to rumors that Cadillac was going to show a V-10, only to be outdone when the rumored V-10 turned out to be the Cadillac Sixteen, with a claimed 1,000 hp (750 kW) V16 that could shut down 8 or 12 cylinders at a time to save fuel.[12] Yet even these monsters would be upstaged by an even more unexpected debut, Dodge's V-10 motorcycle, unveiled the day after the Sixteen.[12] In response, GM executive Bob Lutz, who himself had helped conceive the Viper in 1988 when he was at Chrysler, was asked where his 1,000 hp V-16 motorcycle was, and he answered, in the wry spirit of the question, that he had none, pounding the table and saying, "Rats, outmaneuvered by Chrysler again!"[12][13]
AutoWeek named the Ford 427 "Best Concept" and the Cadillac V-16 "Best in Show" for 2003, and the editors said they wished they had an award for "Best Automotive Sculpture" to give to the unexpected motorcycle they found so likable.[14] The jury of 35 journalists of the North American Concept Vehicle of the Year chose the General Motors Hy-wire over the Tomahawk for the 2003 Specialty Concept Vehicle of the Year award.[15] The Tomahawk was remembered in 2014 by Automotive News as one of the "10 Most Memorable World Debuts".[16][17] In the years after the Tomahawk made its high-profile entrance, the Detroit Auto Show became more modest in scale, and the automakers' battle to outdo each other with boundary-breaking dream cars faded in the years leading up to the 2008 auto industry crisis, and the more cautious recovery that followed.[10]
Performance claims
As introduced in 2003, the one-of-a-kind Tomahawk was operational and road-ready, but not fully road-tested, and acceleration and top speed were not confirmed; Dodge described the vehicle both as "automotive sculpture," intended for display only, and as "rideable".[1][18] A request from one publication to test the Tomahawk's performance was refused, and Dodge declined the same publication's request to interview the company's test riders, or to relay their riding impressions.[3]
See also
References
- ^ a b c d Lienert, Dan (October 14, 2003), "Vehicle of the Week; Dodge's New Axe", Forbes
- ^ a b Chronicle Staff Report (November 18, 2006), "San Francisco Auto Show -- a bit more than the usual fare", San Francisco Chronicle
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p "Dodge's 4-Wheel Tomahawk", Popular Science, vol. 262, no. 4, Bonnier Corporation, April 2003, ISSN 0161-7370
- ^ a b c Phillips, John (April 2003), "Dodge Tomahawk; Ten cylinders, 500 horses, four wheels. Think of it as a Viper that got caught in a trash compactor", Cycle World, pp. 70–74
- ^ a b c d e f g "Chrysler's cruise missile", Design News, October 20, 2003, archived from the original on December 22, 2015, retrieved February 23, 2012
- ^ Mateja, Jim; Popely, Rick (January 7, 2003), "Dodge Tomahawk a cruise missile; 4-wheel cycle uses Viper engine", Chicago Tribune, retrieved December 10, 2011
- ^ Kerr, Glynn (June 2004), "Motorcycle Design—The Detroit Spinners", Motorcycle Consumer News, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 36–37
- ^ Wilkinson, Stephan (2005), Man and Machine: The Best of Stephan Wilkinson, Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 84–85, ISBN 9781599216799
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u Karr, Jeff (April 2003), "Traumahawk: with its Tomahawk concept bike, Dodge jumps into the motorcycle business (maybe) with four wheels, 500 horsepower and 1500 pounds. Get your affairs in order", Motorcyclist, pp. 34–
- ^ a b "The rise and fall of the Detroit auto show", Automobile Magazine, pp. 12+, April 2011
- ^ Naughton, Keith (February 24, 2003), "My Engine Is Bigger Than Your Engine: Carmakers Are Locked in a Horsepower Arms Race", Newsweek, Harmon Newsweek LLC – via Questia (subscription required) , p. 60
- ^ a b c Mateja, Jim (January 13, 2003), "SSR sticker proves to be shocking", Chicago Tribune
- ^ the Auto Editors of Consumer Guide, "History of the Dodge Viper", Howstuffworks Auto
{{citation}}:|author=has generic name (help) - ^ "Rumble in Detroit: Part 2 of 2", AutoWeek, p. 22, January 20, 2003
- ^ "2003 North American Concept Vehicle Of The Year Award Winners Announced", Advanced Materials & Composites News, – via HighBeam (subscription required) , March 17, 2003, archived from the original on May 4, 2016
- ^ Nauman, Matt (February 2003), Concept cars: Models that may become reality, Knight Ridder/Tribune News Service
- ^ "The 10 most memorable world debuts", Automotive News, p. 28, January 6, 2014
- ^ 2003 Dodge Tomahawk Concept Vehicle [press release], Auburn Hills, Michigan: FCA US LLC, January 6, 2003
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "Runk" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "Patton" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "Kiino2003" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "AutoweekButWait" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "Jensen2003" is not used in the content (see the help page).
Cite error: A list-defined reference named "2006PressRelease" is not used in the content (see the help page).
External links
