User talk:Kthxbay: Difference between revisions
→DS Alert: new section |
Undid revision 955517611 by Aman.kumar.goel (talk)Rv, possible sock |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
::[[User:Goldsztajn|Goldsztajn]], I was already handling a sock and they were continuously removing this remake controversy..Lol. So when I find you were on it, I just improved your creation.(: -[[User:Kthxbay|Kthxbay]] ([[User talk:Kthxbay#top|talk]]) 16:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC) |
::[[User:Goldsztajn|Goldsztajn]], I was already handling a sock and they were continuously removing this remake controversy..Lol. So when I find you were on it, I just improved your creation.(: -[[User:Kthxbay|Kthxbay]] ([[User talk:Kthxbay#top|talk]]) 16:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC) |
||
== DS Alert == |
|||
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. ''It does '''not''' imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.'' |
|||
You have shown interest in [[India]], [[Pakistan]], and [[Afghanistan]]. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions|discretionary sanctions]] is in effect. Any administrator may impose [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Sanctions|sanctions]] on editors who do not strictly follow [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies]], or the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Page restrictions|page-specific restrictions]], when making edits related to the topic. |
|||
For additional information, please see the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions#Guidance for editors|guidance on discretionary sanctions]] and the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee|Arbitration Committee's]] decision [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan|here]]. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
|||
}}{{Z33}}<!-- Derived from Template:Ds/alert --> |
|||
'''[[User:Aman.kumar.goel|Aman Kumar Goel]]''' <sup>(''[[User talk:Aman.kumar.goel|Talk]]'')</sup> 07:42, 8 May 2020 (UTC) |
Revision as of 07:44, 8 May 2020
Vandalism
Hi Kthxbay, I want to know why editing Kishore Kumar can cause vandalism and my edit not being constructive. I'm surprised to learn more about it. I'm sorry for doing this, I just didn't know about that, neither it showed on my notification page. So if you know that, you can put a notification at my page instead of your page, that way I could know what I shouldn't edit. Thank you. We are the Great (talk) 02:24, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
- We are the Great, the material added to Wikipedia must have been published previously by a reliable source which was not there [1] in case of your edits. Editors may not add their own views to articles simply because they believe them to be correct. Please read WP:NOTTRUTH. Kthxbay (talk) 14:21, 15 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
December 2019
Thank you for making a report on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report it. Thank you. IanDBeacon (talk) 16:37, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
Momina Mustehsan
Hi Kthxbay. Since you restored the information, could you take some time to rewrite it so the meaning is clear and the tone appropriate for inclusion in an encyclopedia article about Mustehsan? Thanks. --Hipal/Ronz (talk) 19:02, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Ko Ko Korina (remake)
I was wondering how long it would take for the remake "controversy" (sic) to make it into the article. LOL. But being serious, thank you for adding to it...Regards,--Goldsztajn (talk) 15:52, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
- Goldsztajn, I was already handling a sock and they were continuously removing this remake controversy..Lol. So when I find you were on it, I just improved your creation.(: -Kthxbay (talk) 16:03, 15 April 2020 (UTC)