Jump to content

Origin of life: Difference between revisions

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
No edit summary
 
(472 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT[[Abiogenesis]]
:''This article focuses on modern scientific research on the origin of life, including the heterotroph hypothesis. For alternate uses, see [[origin of life (disambiguation)]].''
{{r mentioned in hatnote}}

[[Image:Stromatolites.jpg|right|thumbnail|250px|[[Pre-Cambrian]] [[stromatolites]] in the Siyeh Formation, [[Glacier National Park (US)|Glacier National Park]]. In 2002, William Schopf of [[UCLA]] published a controversial paper in the [[scientific journal]] ''[[Nature (journal)|Nature]]'' arguing that geological formations such as this possess 3.5 billion year old [[fossilized]] [[algae]] microbes.<ref>[http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/space/SpaceRepublish_497964.htm http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/space/SpaceRepublish_497964.htm]</ref> If true, they would be the earliest known life on earth.]]

In the [[physical sciences]], abiogenesis, the question of the '''origin of [[life]]''', is the study of how [[life on Earth]] might have evolved from [[non-life]] sometime between 3.9 and 3.5 [[billion]] years ago. This topic also includes theories and ideas regarding possible extra-planetary or extra-terrestrial origin of life hypotheses, thought to have possibly occurred over the last 13.7 billion years in the [[evolution]] of the known [[universe]] since the [[big bang]].

Origin of life studies is a limited field of research despite its profound impact on [[biology]] and human understanding of the natural world. Progress in this field is generally slow and sporadic, though it still draws the attention of many due to the eminence of the question being investigated. One plausible reason for the slow rate of progress is that it is difficult to obtain funding for research in this area, since practical commercial applications for the research are difficult to foresee. A few facts give insight into the conditions in which life may have emerged, but the mechanisms by which non-life became life are still elusive.

Given that the origin of life is proposed to have proceeded by spontaneous chemical reaction, the chemistry concerned should presumably be rather robust and therefore relatively easy to repeat. The fact that it is proving very difficult to do so is a major challenge for researchers in this field, suggesting they may be focusing on the wrong locations, and on the wrong initial chemistry.

For the observed evolution of life on earth, see the [[timeline of life]].

== History of the concept in science==

In a letter to [[Joseph Dalton Hooker]] on February 1, 1871, [[Charles Darwin]] made the suggestion that the original spark of life may have begun in a "warm little pond, with all sorts of ammonia and phosphoric salts, lights, heat, electricity, etc. present, [so] that a protein compound was chemically formed ready to undergo still more complex changes". He went on to explain that "at the present day such matter would be instantly devoured or absorbed, which would not have been the case before living creatures were formed." In other words, the presence of life itself prevents the spontaneous generation of simple organic compounds from occurring on Earth today&nbsp;&ndash; a circumstance which makes the search for the origin of life dependent on the sterile conditions of the laboratory.

[[Image:Aleksandr Oparin and Andrei Kursanov in enzymology laboratory 1938.jpg|thumb|right|Aleksandr Oparin (right) at the laboratory]]
An experimental approach to the question was beyond the scope of laboratory science in Darwin's day, and no real progress was made until 1924 when [[Aleksandr Ivanovich Oparin]] demonstrated that it was the presence of atmospheric oxygen and other more sophisticated life-forms that prevented the chain of events that would lead to the evolution of life. In his ''The Origin of Life on Earth'', Oparin argued that a "primeval soup" of organic molecules could be created in an oxygen-less atmosphere through the action of sunlight. These would combine in ever-more complex fashion until they dissolved into a [[coacervate]] droplet. These droplets would "[[cell growth|grow]]" by fusion with other droplets, and "[[biological reproduction|reproduce]]" through fission into daughter droplets, and so have a primitive [[metabolism]] in which those factors which promote "cell integrity" survive, those that don't become extinct. Many modern theories of the origin of life still take Oparin's ideas as a starting point.

== Current models ==

There is no truly "standard" model of the origin of life. But most currently accepted models build in one way or another upon a number of discoveries about the origin of molecular and cellular components for life, which are listed in a rough order of postulated emergence:

# Plausible pre-biotic conditions result in the creation of certain basic small [[molecule]]s (monomers) of life, such as [[amino acid]]s. This was demonstrated in the [[Miller experiment|Miller-Urey experiment]] by [[Stanley L. Miller]] and [[Harold C. Urey]] in 1953.
# [[Phospholipid]]s (of an appropriate length) can spontaneously form [[lipid bilayer]]s, a basic component of the [[cell membrane]].
# The [[polymer]]ization of [[nucleotide]]s into random [[RNA]] molecules might have resulted in self-replicating ''[[ribozyme]]s'' (''[[RNA world hypothesis]]'').
# [[Selection]] pressures for catalytic efficiency and diversity result in ribozymes which catalyse [[peptidyl transfer]] (hence formation of small proteins), since oligopeptides complex with RNA to form better catalysts. Thus the first [[ribosome]] is born, and protein synthesis becomes more prevalent.
# [[Proteins]] outcompete ribozymes in catalytic ability, and therefore become the dominant biopolymer. Nucleic acids are restricted to predominantly [[genomic]] use.

The origin of the basic [[biomolecule]]s, while not settled, is less controversial than the significance and order of steps 2 and 3. The basic chemicals from which life was thought to have formed are [[methane]] (CH<sub>4</sub>), [[ammonia]] (NH<sub>3</sub>), [[water]] (H<sub>2</sub>O), [[hydrogen sulfide]] (H<sub>2</sub>S), [[carbon dioxide]] (CO<sub>2</sub>) or [[carbon monoxide]] (CO), and [[phosphate]] (PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3-</sup>). Molecular [[oxygen]] (O<sub>2</sub>) and [[ozone]] (O<sub>3</sub>) were either rare or absent.

As of [[2007]], no one has yet synthesized a "protocell" using basic components which would have the necessary properties of life (the so-called ''"bottom-up-approach"''). Without such a proof-of-principle, explanations have tended to be short on specifics. However, some researchers are working in this field, notably Steen Rasmussen at [[Los Alamos National Laboratory]] and [[Jack Szostak]] at [[Harvard University]]. Others have argued that a ''"top-down approach"'' is more feasible. One such approach, attempted by [[Craig Venter]] and others at [[The Institute for Genomic Research]], involves engineering existing prokaryotic cells with progressively fewer genes, attempting to discern at which point the most minimal requirements for life were reached. The biologist [[John Desmond Bernal]], coined the term [[Abiogenesis|Biopoesis]] for this process, and suggested that there were a number of clearly defined "stages" that could be recognised in explaining the origin of life.

Stage 1: The origin of biological [[monomers]]<br>
Stage 2: The origin of biological [[polymers]]<br>
Stage 3: The evolution from molecules to cell

Bernal suggested that [[evolution|Darwinian evolution]] may have commenced early, some time between Stage 1 and 2.

=== Origin of organic molecules ===
[[Image:UreyMillerExperiment.jpeg|thumb|right|The Miller-Urey experiment attempted to recreate the chemical conditions of the primitive Earth in the laboratory, and synthesized some of the building blocks of life.]]

==== Miller's experiments ====

In 1953 a graduate student, [[Stanley Miller]], and his professor, [[Harold Urey]], performed an experiment that proved organic molecules could have spontaneously formed on Early Earth from inorganic precursors. The now-famous “[[Miller experiment|Miller-Urey experiment]]” used a highly reduced mixture of gases - [[methane]], [[ammonia]] and [[hydrogen]] – to form basic organic [[monomer]]s, such as amino acids. Whether the mixture of gases used in the Miller-Urey experiment truly reflects the atmospheric content of [[Early Earth]] is a controversial topic. Other less reducing gases produce a lower yield and variety. It was once thought that appreciable amounts of molecular oxygen were present in the prebiotic atmosphere, which would have essentially prevented the formation of organic molecules; however, the current scientific consensus is that such was not the case.
In 2006 another experiment showed that a thick organic haze might have blanketed [[Early Earth]] [http://intl.pnas.org/cgi/content/short/103/48/18035]. An organic haze can form over a wide range of methane and carbon dioxide concentrations, believed to be present in the atmosphere of [[Early Earth]]. After forming, these organic molecules would have floated down all over the Earth, allowing life to flourish globally [http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/node/829].

Simple organic molecules are of course a long way from a fully functional [[self-replication|self-replicating]] life form. But in an environment with no pre-existing life these molecules may have accumulated and provided a rich environment for [[chemical evolution]] ("[[primeval soup|soup theory]]"). On the other hand, the spontaneous formation of complex [[polymer]]s from abiotically generated monomers under these conditions is not at all a straightforward process. Besides the necessary basic organic monomers, also compounds that would have prohibited the formation of polymers were formed in high concentration during the experiments.

Other sources of complex molecules have been postulated, including sources of extra-terrestrial stellar or interstellar origin. For example, from spectral analyses, organic molecules are known to be present in comets and meteorites. In [[2004]], a team [[Aromatic hydrocarbon#PAHs and the origins of life|detected]] traces of [[polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon]]s (PAH's) in a [[nebula]], the most complex molecule, to that date, found in space. The use of PAH's has also been proposed as a precursor to the RNA world in the [[PAH world hypothesis]].

It can be argued that the most crucial challenge unanswered by this theory is how the relatively simple organic building blocks polymerise and form more complex structures, interacting in consistent ways to form a protocell. For example, in an aqueous environment [[hydrolysis]] of oligomers/polymers into their constituent monomers would be favored over the condensation of individual monomers into polymers. Also, the Miller experiment produces many substances that would undergo cross-reactions with the amino acids or terminate the peptide chain.

==== Eigen's hypothesis ====

In the early [[1970s]] a major attack on the problem of the origin of life was organized by a team of scientists gathered around [[Manfred Eigen]] of the [[Max Planck Institute]]. They tried to examine the transient stages between the molecular chaos in a prebiotic soup and the transient stages of a self replicating [[hypercycle]], between the molecular chaos in a prebiotic soup and simple macromolecular self-reproducing systems.

In a hypercycle, the [[information|information storing system]] (possibly [[RNA]]) produces an enzyme, which catalyzes the formation of another information system, in sequence until the product of the last aids in the formation of the first information system. Mathematically treated, hypercycles could create [[Quasispecies model|quasispecies]], which through natural selection entered into a form of Darwinian evolution. A boost to hypercycle theory was the discovery that RNA, in certain circumstances forms itself into ribozymes, a form of RNA [[enzyme]].

==== Wächtershäuser's hypothesis ====

Another possible answer to this polymerization conundrum was provided in [[1980s]] by [[Günter Wächtershäuser]], in his [[iron-sulfur world theory]]. In this theory, he postulated the evolution of (bio)chemical pathways as fundamentals of the evolution of life. Moreover, he presented a consistent system of tracing today's biochemistry back to ancestral reactions that provide alternative pathways to the synthesis of organic building blocks from simple gaseous compounds.

In contrast to the classical Miller experiments, which depend on external sources of energy (such as simulated lightning or UV irradiation), "Wächtershäuser systems" come with a built-in source of energy, [[sulfide]]s of [[iron]] and other minerals (e.g. pyrite). The energy released from redox reactions of these metal sulfides is not only available for the synthesis of organic molecules, but also for the formation of [[oligomer]]s and [[polymer]]s. It is therefore hypothesized that such systems may be able to evolve into [[autocatalytic sets]] of self-replicating, metabolically active entities that would predate the life forms known today.

The experiment as performed, produced a relatively small yield of dipeptides (0.4% to 12.4%) and a smaller yield of tripeptides (0.10%) and the authors note that: "under these same conditions dipeptides hydrolysed rapidly." Another criticism of the result is that the experiment did not include any organomolecules that would most likely cross-react or chain-terminate (Huber and Wächtershäuser, 1998).

The latest modification of the iron-sulfur-hypothesis was provided by William Martin and Michael Russell in 2002. According to their scenario, the first cellular life forms may have evolved inside so-called [[black smokers]] at seafloor spreading zones in the deep sea. These structures consist of microscale caverns that are coated by thin membraneous metal sulfide walls. Therefore, these structures would solve several critical points of the "pure" Wächtershäuser systems at once:

# the micro-caverns provide a means of concentrating newly synthesised molecules, thereby increasing the chance of forming oligomers;
# the steep temperature gradients inside a black smoker allow for establishing "optimum zones" of partial reactions in different regions of the black smoker (e.g. monomer synthesis in the hotter, oligomerisation in the colder parts);
# the flow of hydrothermal water through the structure provides a constant source of building blocks and energy (freshly precipitated metal sulfides);
# the model allows for a succession of different steps of cellular evolution (prebiotic chemistry, monomer and oligomer synthesis, peptide and protein synthesis, RNA world, ribonucleoprotein assembly and DNA world) in a single structure, facilitating exchange between all developmental stages;
# synthesis of lipids as a means of "closing" the cells against the environment is not necessary, until basically all cellular functions are developed.

This model locates the "last universal common ancestor" ([[LUCA]]) inside a black smoker, rather than assuming the existence of a free-living form of LUCA. The last evolutionary step would be the synthesis of a lipid membrane that finally allows the organisms to leave the microcavern system of the black smokers and start their independent lives. This postulated late acquisition of lipids is consistent with the presence of completely different types of membrane lipids in archaebacteria and eubacteria (plus eukaryotes) with highly similar cellular physiology of all life forms in most other aspects.

Another unsolved issue in chemical evolution is the origin of [[homochirality]], i.e. all monomers having the same "handedness" (amino acids being left handed, and nucleic acid sugars being right handed). Homochirality is essential for the formation of functional ribozymes (and probably proteins too). The origin of homochirality might simply be explained by an initial asymmetry by chance followed by common descent. Work performed in 2003 by scientists at Purdue identified the amino acid [[serine]] as being a probable root cause of organic molecules' homochirality. Serine forms particularly strong bonds with amino acids of the same chirality, resulting in a cluster of eight molecules that must be all right-handed or left-handed. This property stands in contrast with other amino acids which are able to form weak bonds with amino acids of opposite chirality. Although the mystery of why left-handed serine became dominant is still unsolved, this result suggests an answer to the question of chiral transmission: how organic molecules of one chirality maintain dominance once asymmetry is established.

===From organic molecules to protocells===

The question "How do simple organic molecules form a protocell?" is largely unanswered but there are many hypotheses. Some of these postulate the early appearance of nucleic acids ("[[gene]]s-first") whereas others postulate the evolution of biochemical reactions and pathways first ("[[metabolism]]-first"). Recently, trends are emerging to create hybrid models that combine aspects of both.

===="Genes first" models: the RNA world====
{{main|RNA world hypothesis}}

[[The RNA world hypothesis]] suggests that relatively short [[RNA]] molecules could have spontaneously formed that were capable of catalyzing their own continuing replication. It is difficult to gauge the probability of this formation. A number of theories of modes of formation have been put forward. Early cell membranes could have formed spontaneously from [[proteinoid]]s, protein-like molecules that are produced when amino acid solutions are heated - when present at the correct concentration in aqueous solution, these form microspheres which are observed to behave similarly to membrane-enclosed compartments. Other possibilities include systems of chemical reactions taking place within [[clay]] substrates or on the surface of [[pyrite]] rocks. Factors supportive of an important role for RNA in early life include its ability to replicate (see [[Spiegelman Monster]]); its ability to act both to store information and catalyse chemical reactions (as a [[ribozyme]]); its many important roles as an intermediate in the expression and maintenance of the genetic information (in the form of [[DNA]]) in modern organisms; and the ease of chemical synthesis of at least the components of the molecule under conditions approximating the early Earth.

A number of problems with the RNA world hypothesis remain, particularly the instability of RNA when exposed to [[ultraviolet]] light, the difficulty of activating and ligating nucleotides and the lack of available phosphate in solution required to constitute the backbone, and the instability of the base cytosine (which is prone to hydrolysis). Recent experiments also suggest that the original estimates of the size of an RNA molecule capable of self-replication were most probably vast underestimates. More-modern forms of the RNA World theory propose that a simpler molecule was capable of self-replication (that other "World" then evolved over time to produce the RNA World). At this time however, the various hypotheses have incomplete evidence supporting them. Many of them can be simulated and tested in the lab, but a lack of undisturbed sedimentary rock from that early in Earth's history leaves few opportunities to test this hypothesis robustly.

===="Metabolism first" models: iron-sulfur world and others====

Several models reject the idea of the self-replication of a "naked-gene" and postulate the emergence of a primitive metabolism which could provide an environment for the later emergence of RNA replication.

One of the earliest incarnations of this idea was put forward in [[1924]] with [[Alexander Oparin]]'s notion of primitive self-replicating [[vesicle (biology)|vesicle]]s which predated the discovery of the structure of DNA. More recent variants in the [[1980s]] and [[1990s]] include [[Günter Wächtershäuser]]'s [[iron-sulfur world theory]] and models introduced by [[Christian de Duve]] based on the chemistry of [[thioester]]s. More abstract and theoretical arguments for the plausibility of the emergence of metabolism without the presence of genes include a mathematical model introduced by [[Freeman Dyson]] in the early [[1980s]] and [[Stuart Kauffman]]'s notion of collectively [[autocatalytic set]]s, discussed later in that decade.

However, the idea that a closed metabolic cycle, such as the reductive [[citric acid cycle]], could form spontaneously (proposed by Günter Wächtershäuser) remains unsupported. According to [[Leslie Orgel]], a leader in origin-of-life studies for the past several decades, there is reason to believe the assertion will remain so. In an article entitled "Self-Organizing Biochemical Cycles" (''PNAS, vol. 97, no. 23, [[November 7]] [[2000]], p12503-12507''), Orgel summarizes his analysis of the proposal by stating, "There is at present no reason to expect that multistep cycles such as the reductive citric acid cycle will self-organize on the surface of FeS/FeS2 or some other mineral." It is possible that another type of metabolic pathway was used at the beginning of life. For example, instead of the reductive citric acid cycle, the "open" acetyl-CoA pathway (another one of the four recognised ways of carbon dioxide fixation in nature today) would be even more compatible with the idea of self-organisation on a metal sulfide surface. The key enzyme of this pathway, carbon monoxide dehydrogenase/acetyl-CoA synthase harbours mixed nickel-iron-sulfur clusters in its reaction centers and catalyses the formation of acetyl-CoA (which may be regarded as a modern form of acetyl-thiol) in a single step.

====Bubble Theory====

Waves breaking on the shore create a delicate foam composed of bubbles. Winds sweeping across the ocean have a tendency to drive things to shore, much like driftwood collecting on the beach. It is possible that organic molecules were concentrated on the shorelines in much the same way. Shallow coastal waters also tend to be warmer, further concentrating the molecules through [[evaporation]]. While bubbles comprised of mostly water burst quickly, oily bubbles happen to be much more stable, lending more time to the particular bubble to perform these crucial experiments.

The [[phospholipid]] is a good example of an oily compound believed to have been prevalent in the prebiotic seas. Because phospholipids contain a [[hydrophilic]] head on one end, and a [[hydrophobic]] tail on the other, they have the tendency to spontaneously form lipid membranes in water. A lipid monolayer bubble can only contain oil, and is therefore not conducive to harbouring water-soluble organic molecules. On the other hand, a lipid bilayer bubble can contain water, and was a likely precursor to the modern cell membrane. If a protein came along that increased the integrity of its parent bubble, then that bubble had an advantage, and was placed at the top of the [[natural selection]] waiting list. Primitive reproduction can be envisioned when the bubbles burst, releasing the results of the experiment into the surrounding medium. Once enough of the 'right stuff' was released into the medium, the development of the first [[prokaryotes]], [[eukaryotes]], and multicellular organisms could be achieved. This theory is expanded upon in the book, ''"The Cell: Evolution of the First Organism"'' by [[Joseph Panno]] Ph.D.

Similarly, bubbles formed entirely out of protein-like molecules, called [[microsphere]]s, will form spontaneously under the right conditions. But they are not a likely precursor to the modern cell membrane, as cell membranes are composed primarily of lipid compounds rather than amino-acid compounds (for types of membrane spheres associated with abiogenesis,see [[protobionts]], [[micelle]], [[coacervate]]).

====Hybrid models====

A growing realization of the inadequacy of either pure "genes-first" or "metabolism-first" models is leading the trend towards models that incorporate aspects of each. <!-- more needed here, some of Wachtershauser's ideas might fall in here -->

==Other models==
===Autocatalysis===
[[United Kingdom|British]] [[ethologist]] [[Richard Dawkins]] wrote about [[autocatalysis]] as a potential explanation for the origin of life in his [[2004]] book ''[[The Ancestor's Tale]]''. Autocatalysts are substances which catalyze the production of themselves, and therefore have the property of being a simple molecular replicator. In his book, Dawkins cites experiments performed by [[Julius Rebek]] and his colleagues at the [[Scripps Research Institute]] in [[California]] in which they combined amino adenosine and pentafluorophenyl ester with the autocatalyst amino adenosine triacid ester (AATE). One system from the experiment contained variants of AATE which catalysed the synthesis of themselves. This experiment demonstrated the possibility that autocatalysts could exhibit competition within a population of entities with heredity, which could be interpreted as a rudimentary form of [[natural selection]].

===Clay theory===

A theory for the origin of life based on [[clay]] was forwarded by Dr A. [[Graham Cairns-Smith]] of the [[University of Glasgow]] in [[1985]] and adopted as a plausible illustration by just a handful of other scientists (including [[Richard Dawkins]]). [[Graham Cairns-Smith#Clay Theory|Clay theory]] postulates that complex organic molecules arose gradually on a pre-existing, non-organic replication platform -- silicate crystals in solution. Complexity in companion molecules developed as a function of selection pressures on types of clay crystal is then [[Exaptation|exapted]] to serve the replication of organic molecules independently of their silicate "launch stage". It is, truly, "life from a rock."

Cairns-Smith is a staunch critic of other models of chemical evolution (see ''Genetic Takeover: And the Mineral Origins of Life'' ISBN 0-521-23312-7). However, he admits, that like many models of the origin of life, his own also has its shortcomings (Horgan 1991).

Peggy Rigou of the National Institute of Agronomic Research ([[INRA]]), in [[Jouy-en-Josas]], France reports in the February 11, 2006 edition of [[Science News]] that [[prion]]s are capable of binding to clay particles and migrate off the particles when the clay becomes negatively charged. While no reference is made in the report to implications for origin-of-life theories, this research may suggest prions as a likely pathway to early reproducing molecules.

==="Deep-hot biosphere" model of Gold===
The discovery of [[nanobe]]s (filamental structures smaller than bacteria containing DNA) in deep rocks, led to a controversial theory put forward by [[Thomas Gold]] in the [[1990s]] that life first developed not on the surface of the Earth, but several kilometers below the surface. It is now known that [[microbe|microbial]] life is plentiful up to five kilometers below the earth's surface in the form of [[archaea]], which are generally considered to have originated either before or around the same time as [[bacterium|eubacteria]], most of which live on the surface including the oceans. It is claimed that discovery of microbial life below the surface of another body in our [[solar system]] would lend significant credence to this theory. He also noted that a trickle of food from a deep, unreachable, source promotes survival because life arising in a puddle of organic material is likely to consume all of its food and become extinct.

==="Primitive" extraterrestrial life===

An alternative to Earthly abiogenesis is the hypothesis that primitive life may have originally formed extraterrestrially, either in space or on a nearby planet (Mars). (Note that ''exogenesis'' is related to, but not the same as, the notion of [[panspermia]]).

Organic compounds are relatively common in space, especially in the outer solar system where volatiles are not evaporated by solar heating. Comets are encrusted by outer layers of dark material, thought to be a [[tar]]-like substance composed of complex organic material formed from simple carbon compounds after reactions initiated mostly by irradiation by [[ultraviolet]] light. It is supposed that a rain of material from [[comet]]s could have brought significant quantities of such complex organic molecules to Earth.

An alternative but related hypothesis, proposed to explain the presence of life on Earth so soon after the planet had cooled down, with apparently very little time for prebiotic evolution, is that life formed first on early [[Mars (planet)|Mars]]. Due to its smaller size Mars cooled before Earth(a difference of hundreds of millions of years), allowing prebiotic processes there while Earth was still too hot. Life was then transported to the cooled Earth when crustal material was blasted off Mars by asteroid and comet impacts. Mars continued to cool faster and eventually became hostile to the continued evolution or even existence of life (it lost its atmosphere due to low volcanism), Earth is following the same fate as Mars, but at a slower rate.

Neither hypothesis actually answers the question of how life first originated, but merely shifts it to another planet or a comet. However, the advantage of an extraterrestrial origin of primitive life is that life is not required to have evolved on each planet it occurs on, but rather in a single location, and then spread about the galaxy to other star systems via cometary and/or meteorite impact. Evidence to support the plausibility of the concept is scant, but it finds support in recent study of Martian meteorites found in Antarctica and in studies of extremophile microbes.<ref>[http://www.newscientist.com/channel/life/evolution/dn2844 http://www.newscientist.com/channel/life/evolution/dn2844]</ref> Additional support comes from a recent discovery of a bacterial ecosytem whose energy source is radioactivity.<ref>{{cite journal
|title = Long-Term Sustainability of a High-Energy, Low-Diversity Crustal Biome
|first = Li-Hung
|last = Lin
|coauthors = Pei-Ling Wang, Douglas Rumble, Johanna Lippmann-Pipke, Erik Boice, Lisa M. Pratt, Barbara Sherwood Lollar, Eoin L. Brodie, Terry C. Hazen, Gary L. Andersen, Todd Z. DeSantis, Duane P. Moser, Dave Kershaw, T. C. Onstott
|journal = Science
|month = October
|year = 2006
|volume = 314
|pages = 479-482
|id = 5798
|doi = 10.1126/science.1127376
|accessdate = 2006-11-12
}}</ref>

=== The Lipid World ===
There is a theory that ascribes the first self-replicating object to be lipid-like.<ref>[http://ool.weizmann.ac.il/ http://ool.weizmann.ac.il/]</ref> It is known that phospolipids spontaneously form bilayers in water - the same structure as as cell membranes, further more these bodies may expend (by insertion of additional phospholipids) and under excessive expansion they may undergo spontaneous splitting which preserve the same composition of lipids in the two progenies. The main idea in this theory is that the molecular composition of the lipid bodies is the preliminary way for information storage and evolution led to the appearance of polymer entities such as RNA or DNA that may store information favorably.

===The Ecopoesis model===
The Ecopoesis model [http://www.ecopoese.bio.br/ingles.htm] proposes that the geochemical cycles of biogenic elements, driven by an early oxygen-rich atmosphere, were the basis of a planetary metabolism that preceded and conditioned the gradual evolution of organismal life.

==Relevant fields==

* [[Astrobiology]] is a field that may shed light on the nature of life in general, instead of just life as we know it on Earth, and may give clues as to how life originates.
* [[Complex system]]s

==See also==

* [[:Category:Origin of life]]
* [[List of publications in biology#Origin of life|Important publications in origin of life]]
* [[Abiogenesis]]
* [[Anthropic principle]]
* [[Astrochemistry]]
* [[Biogenesis]]
* [[Drake equation]]
* [[Fine-tuned universe]]
* [[History of Earth]]
* [[Meaning of Life]]
* [[Mimivirus]] Giant and very old virus that could have emerged prior to cellular organisms.
* [[Panspermia]]
* [[Planetary habitability]]
* [[Rare Earth hypothesis]]
* [[Universal common ancestor]]
* [[Zeolite]]s
* [[Stuart Kauffman]]
* [[Origin of the world's oceans]]

==Notes==
{{reflist}}

==References==
*{{cite book|
title=Origins and Development of Living Systems.|
last=Brooks|
first=J|
coauthors=Shaw, G.|
year=1973|
publisher=[[Academic Press]]|
id=ISBN 0-12-135740-6|
pages=359
}}
*{{cite book|
title=Vital Dust: The Origin and Evolution of Life on Earth|
last=De Duve |
first=Christian|
authorlink=Christian de Duve|
year=1996|
month=Jan|
publisher=[[Basic Books]]|
id=ISBN 0-465-09045-1|
}}
*{{cite journal| author=Horgan, J |title=In the beginning |journal=[[Scientific American]]| year=1991 |volume=264 | pages=100–109}} (Cited on p. 108).
*{{cite journal| author=Huber, C. and Wächterhäuser, G., |title=Peptides by activation of amino acids with CO on (Ni,Fe)S surfaces: implications for the origin of life|journal=[[Science (journal)|Science]]| year=1998 |volume=281 | pages=670–672}} (Cited on p. 108).
*{{cite journal| author=Martin, W. and Russell M.J. |title=On the origins of cells: a hypothesis for the evolutionary transitions from abiotic geochemistry to chemoautotrophic prokaryotes, and from prokaryotes to nucleated cells
|journal=Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological sciences| year=2002 |volume=358 | pages=59-85}}
*{{cite journal | author=JW Schopf et al. | title=Laser-Raman imagery of Earth's earliest fossils. | journal=Nature | year=2002 | volume=416 | pages=73-76 | id=PMID 11882894}}
*{{cite book|
title=The Origins of Life: From the Birth of Life to the Origin of Language|
last=Maynard Smith|
first=John|
authorlink=John Maynard Smith|
coauthors=Szathmary, Eors|
date=2000-03-16|
publisher=Oxford Paperbacks|
id=ISBN 0-19-286209-X
}}
*{{cite book|
last=Hazen|
first=Robert M.|
publisher=Joseph Henry Press|
id=ISBN 0-309-09432-1|
year=2005|
month=Dec|
title=Genesis: The Scientific Quest for Life's Origins|
url=http://newton.nap.edu/books/0309094321/html
}}

==External links==

* [http://genetics.mgh.harvard.edu/szostakweb/publications/Szostak_pdfs/Hanczyc_and_Szostak_2004_COChemBio.pdf Martin M Hanczyc and Jack W Szostak. Replicating vesicles as models of primitive cell growth and division. Current Opinion in Chemical Biology 2004, 8:660–664.]
*[http://www.santafe.edu/sfi/People/kauffman/sak-peptides.html "SELF-REPLICATION: Even peptides do it"] by [[Stuart Kauffman|Stuart A. Kauffman]]
*[http://www.vega.org.uk/video/programme/63 Freeview video 'The Origin of Life by John Maynard-Smith' A Royal Institution Discourse by the Vega Science Trust]
*[http://www.gla.ac.uk/projects/originoflife/ Origins of Life website including papers, resources, by Dr. Michael Russell at the U. of Glasgow]
* [http://pokey.arc.nasa.gov/~astrochm/LifeImplications.html Possible Connections Between Interstellar Chemistry and the Origin of Life on the Earth]
* [http://nai.arc.nasa.gov/news_stories/news_detail.cfm?ID=207 Scientists Find Clues That Life Began in Deep Space &mdash; NASA Astrobiology Institute]
*[http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/97/23/12503?maxtoshow=&HITS=10&hits=10&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=biochemical+cycles&searchid=1119837712082_3423&stored_search=&FIRSTINDEX=0&journalcode=pnas Self-organizing biochemical cycles &mdash; by Leslie Orgel]
*[http://www.livescience.com/animalworld/060609_life_origin.html How Life Began: New Research Suggests Simple Approach]

{{origin_of_life}}

{{Biology-footer}}

[[Category:Evolution]]
[[Category:Metabolism]]
[[Category:Origin of life| ]]

{{Link FA|ja}}

[[ar:أصل الحياة]]
[[bg:Произход на живота]]
[[ca:Origen de la vida]]
[[de:Entstehung des Lebens]]
[[et:Elu teke]]
[[es:Origen de la vida]]
[[fr:Origines de la vie]]
[[he:מוצא החיים]]
[[hu:Az élet keletkezése]]
[[nl:Oorsprong van het leven]]
[[ja:生命の起源]]
[[pl:Pochodzenie życia]]
[[ru:Возникновение жизни]]
[[sk:Evolučná abiogenéza]]
[[fi:Elämän alkuperä]]
[[sv:Livets uppkomst]]
[[vi:Nguồn gốc sự sống]]

Latest revision as of 10:22, 20 February 2023

Redirect to:

  • Mentioned in a hatnote: This is a redirect from a title that is mentioned in a hatnote at the redirect target. The mention is usually atop the target article. It may, however, be directly under a section header, or in another article's hatnote (whenever the hatnote is under a section, {{R to section}} should also be used).
    • The titles of redirects mentioned in hatnotes may refer to a subject other than that of the target page. It is possible that this redirect may need to be retargeted, or become an article under its own title (see {{R with possibilities}}). If the title is a good candidate for a Wiktionary link, it may also be added.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Origin_of_life&oldid=1140501767"