Talk:Jay Kay: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:35, 25 September 2005

Uh I, the first part of this is on the Jamiroquai website, doesn't wikipedia not allow to not use copyrighted work? Well if no-one replies with a GOOD answer, within 1 week, I'm taking the bits from the website off.

Neutrality?

This article couldn't be any more biased! Just look at how it's written, it's less informative and more 'jay kay is amazing!' This shouldn't be a place for fans to talk about how great their favourite artist is, it's an encylopaedia!

but wait! doesn't jamiroquai roxor your soxors? like, omigod! :P

Oh f*cking jesus, will somebody PLEASE delete the blatant 'fandalism' on this page?!

Would anyone object to me deleting the entire article and re-writing it?

Please do, this is an encyclopedia, not a fansite. (sigh) ProhibitOnions 14:38, August 15, 2005 (UTC)

No, this hasn't been written by a fan - rather, it's been copied from some commercial source (the official band website it seems).--Deadworm222 19:27, September 9, 2005 (UTC)

I am tagging this page for cleanup and neutrality

Problems: neutrality, possible copyright violation (I cannot verify this), and (extremely) poorly written. IR Mongoose 11:32, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 :No, this hasn't been written by a fan - rather, it's been copied from some commercial source (the official band website it seems).--[[User:Deadworm222|Deadworm222]] 19:27, September 9, 2005 (UTC)
-== I am tagging this page for cleanup ==
+== I am tagging this page for cleanup and neutrality==
 Problems: neutrality, possible copyright violation (I cannot verify this), and (extremely) poorly written.