User talk:Vivaperucarajo: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:25, 10 March 2006

Welcome!

Hello, Vivaperucarajo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! , SqueakBox 05:18, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Input for next Wikiproject Collaboration

Seeing as we are almost done with the Andrés Avelino Cáceres collaboration and March is coming up. I'd thought that I should inform you and the other members of WP:Peru that you can add your thoughts on what you think the next project collaboration should be on at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Peru#Collaboration.--Jersey Devil 21:17, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thankx

Thanx for all the changes you made to the Peru article. It looks a lot better since the last time i read it. I'm from Peru too. --CesarCossio 08:19, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:History of the Ecuadorian-Peruvian territorial dispute

Hello there! I'm also peruvian, and most of the time I try to prevent POV pushing that involves the history and politics of our country. This time; however, a new Wikipedian from Ecuador has attempted to introduce POV in this page. I removed, and he is claiming that the problem is now my person here in Wikipedia. He started a flame war last time (wich you can see in the talk page). Personally, I'm only trying to give the article a fair and NPOV shape. Please, I would gladly recieve any sign of support in this article. Cheers! and I hope to hear from you soon. Messhermit 03:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm from Ecuador. Please note that adding facts and sources from the Ecuadorian side is not POV. Perhaps putting a picture of the Peruvian monument to victory in the article Ecuadorian-Peruvian war, claiming as a historical truth that Ecuador sent troops to occupy Zarumilla, or adding a list of Peruvian heroes could be categorized as NPOV attitudes. But let us leave that to Messhermit.

As for the flame war of months ago, it was not started by me. You can read my attempts to have a moderator see Messhermit's conduct regarding unjustified reverts. Please read the section Complaints of Deletion in Messhermit's talk page. It must be noted that this IP user is the same person that later wrote the article under the nick Neurodivergent. Hope you can help, regardless of nationalities. Regards, and sorry to bother you. Andres C. 15:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support.

As you can see this user relies mostly on Ecuadorian versions of the war. Most of this have either the title Peruvian Aggresion or Peruvian Invasion, and I really have my doubts about the neutrality and imparciality that those sources are.
This Ecuadorian user clearly believes that he has the truth on his sides, and usually gets military figures out of nowhere. his goal thus is presenting a weak and innocent Ecuador against an all mighty and aggresive Peruvian State.
Regarding the Flame War, this user claims to be the victim of my aggressions. Nothing more baseless, since who in his sane mine would use grammatical errors against another wikipedist and make a big fuss over them? or who will accuse another wikipedist of treason to his country just because I didn't serve in my army?.

Best regards, and keep an eye on the page. It seems that we are gonna see Ecuadorian POV pushings for some time. Messhermit 18:25, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 *Hello. I'm from Ecuador. Please note that adding facts and sources from the Ecuadorian side is not POV. Perhaps putting a picture of the Peruvian monument to victory in the article [[Ecuadorian-Peruvian war]], claiming as a historical truth that Ecuador sent troops to occupy Zarumilla, or adding a list of Peruvian heroes could be categorized as NPOV attitudes. But let us leave that to Messhermit.
 As for the flame war of months ago, it was not started by me. You can read my attempts to have a moderator see Messhermit's conduct regarding unjustified reverts. Please read the section Complaints of Deletion in [[User talk:Messhermit|Messhermit's talk page]]. It must be noted that this IP user is the same person that later wrote the article under the nick [[User:Neurodivergent|Neurodivergent]]. Hope you can help, regardless of nationalities. Regards, and sorry to bother you. [[User:Andres C.|Andres C.]] 15:05, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
+<hr>
+Thanks for your support.
+* As you can see this user relies mostly on Ecuadorian versions of the war. Most of this have either the title ''Peruvian Aggresion'' or ''Peruvian Invasion'', and I really have my doubts about the neutrality and imparciality that those sources are.
+* This Ecuadorian user clearly ''believes'' that he has the truth on his sides, and usually gets military figures out of nowhere. his goal thus is presenting a weak and innocent Ecuador against an all mighty and aggresive Peruvian State.
+* Regarding the Flame War, this user claims to be the ''victim'' of ''my'' aggressions. Nothing more baseless, since who in his sane mine would use grammatical errors against another wikipedist and make a big fuss over them? or who will accuse another wikipedist of treason to his country just because I didn't serve in my army?.
+Best regards, and keep an eye on the page. It seems that we are gonna see Ecuadorian POV pushings for some time. [[User:Messhermit|Messhermit]] 18:25, 10 March 2006 (UTC)