Jump to content

Talk:ViewSonic: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Francs2000 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Alphachimpbot (talk | contribs)
m BOT - addition of {{WikiProject Business & Economics}} to Company stubs
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProject Business & Economics|class=stub|importance=}}

Article listed on [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion]] April 11th to April 19th 2004. Discussion:
Article listed on [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion]] April 11th to April 19th 2004. Discussion:



Revision as of 10:57, 23 February 2007

WikiProject iconBusiness Stub‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion April 11th to April 19th 2004. Discussion:

  • advert, not exactly neutral either ping 08:42, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Bad grammar, bad spelling, POV, ad. Four strikes against it. RickK 08:53, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. -Plop 14:50, Apr 11, 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete Bensaccount 15:23, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Delete. Advert, no reason given that it will ever become an article. Andrewa 17:14, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Nonsense, Andrew. ViewSonic is a well-known company; we have articles about all manner of different companies and this is no different. Definitely keep. Darkcore 21:19, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
    • Keep. Now an acceptable stub. Good work. Andrewa 07:04, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • If this is a real company, keep Ensiform 04:41, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Revised entry is appropriate. Cribcage 06:51, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
    • agreed, keep the new version ping 08:00, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • This is a real company. New version seems fine; keep. —Psychonaut 15:41, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Large well-known company. -- Zigger 17:57, 2004 Apr 16 (UTC)
  • Keep. 3m hits can't be wrong. BL 07:38, Apr 19, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. Scurra 16:46, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)