Talk:ViewSonic: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Francs2000 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m BOT - addition of {{WikiProject Business & Economics}} to Company stubs |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Business & Economics|class=stub|importance=}} |
|||
Article listed on [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion]] April 11th to April 19th 2004. Discussion: |
Article listed on [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion]] April 11th to April 19th 2004. Discussion: |
||
Revision as of 10:57, 23 February 2007
Business Stub‑class | ||||||||||
|
Article listed on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion April 11th to April 19th 2004. Discussion:
- advert, not exactly neutral either ping 08:42, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. Bad grammar, bad spelling, POV, ad. Four strikes against it. RickK 08:53, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Delete. -Plop 14:50, Apr 11, 2004 (UTC)
- Delete Bensaccount 15:23, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
Delete. Advert, no reason given that it will ever become an article. Andrewa 17:14, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)- Nonsense, Andrew. ViewSonic is a well-known company; we have articles about all manner of different companies and this is no different. Definitely keep. Darkcore 21:19, 11 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Now an acceptable stub. Good work. Andrewa 07:04, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- If this is a real company, keep Ensiform 04:41, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Revised entry is appropriate. Cribcage 06:51, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- agreed, keep the new version ping 08:00, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- This is a real company. New version seems fine; keep. —Psychonaut 15:41, 12 Apr 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Large well-known company. -- Zigger 17:57, 2004 Apr 16 (UTC)
- Keep. 3m hits can't be wrong. BL 07:38, Apr 19, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Scurra 16:46, 19 Apr 2004 (UTC)