Jump to content

User talk:Rossami: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
VFD/Old/To close
Cool Hand Luke (talk | contribs)
Line 40: Line 40:
== VFD/Old/To close ==
== VFD/Old/To close ==


Hey Rossami, just wanted to drop a note that I created [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Old/To close|a to close log list page]] that may be useful to you. Later!
Hey Rossami, just wanted to drop a note that I created [[Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Old/To close|a to close log list page]] that may be useful to you. Later! --[[User:AllyUnion| AllyUnion]] [[User talk:AllyUnion|(talk)]] 23:24, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Oh, I'm sorry. I just noticed the VfD backlog and started closing them as I used to (before they were kept on day archives). I didn't consider what effects de-sectioning the page title might have. [[User:Cool Hand Luke|Cool Hand]] [[User talk:Cool Hand Luke|<font color="purple">Luke</font>]] 00:26, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:26, 16 March 2005

Purged into page history as of 22:05, 18 Mar 2004 (UTC)
Purged into page history as of 23:22, 2 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Purged into page history as of 06:01, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)


Awarded for your creativity and thoughtfulness when wading through VfD discussions.

Please accept this barnstar. I'm impressed that you never seem reluctant to handle the tough, convoluted VfD closing decisions that lots of people shy away from. Joyous 03:26, Feb 28, 2005 (UTC)

Hi, I've been working to improve the David E. Ritch article (cleaning up, adding headings, removing POV and the like), and since I've fixed it, I was wondering if you'd consider changing your vote. From your summary, I understood that your opposition was due to the son of the subject writing the article; now that I've stepped in, it might be a little bit better. However, it's your vote, and therefore your call. Thank you for considering it. Cheers, Bratsche (talk) 04:26, Mar 7, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for deleting the article. I do think Nez Perce Stake Race deserves a place in Wikipedia—at least I learned a lot from looking it up. I suppose eventually it could be merged with other horse show competitions into a single article , but it would still need to be a redirect as anyone trying to find it would look for Nez Perce Stake Race. DialUp 02:42, 8 Mar 2005 (UTC)

You might want to revisit your vote, since there was no VFD held on it and very few edits to the article itself. Mike H 08:26, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)

Postal districts

Hi there! Since consensus seems to have been achieved, I've closed the discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion policy/Postal district. Could you please read the conclusions posted there and add a short msg to its talk page if you agree? Thanks. Radiant! 10:27, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)

I'm not sure why you blanked the new vote... I think voting is still in progress, and in any case both votes should be preserved and archived when voting concludes. -- Curps 01:27, 9 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Help?!?

I got confused about the page that I needed to create for making a vote to nominate a picture for featured image status, and wound up making two. My guess is that one of them will need to be deleted, but I have no idea which, and I would rather not guess on this since it took me 2.5 hours to figure it out. The picture in question is titled "Missouri missiles.png", and if you go to it you can see the two pages I'm talking about. Can you help? TomStar81 03:45, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

  • Chris 73 just volenteered to delete one of the two pages, so make sure an check to see which one is up for deletion. Thanx TomStar81
Cris 73 delted the redunt page, so you don't need to. Thanks TomStar81 03:57, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Universism Undeletion

Rossami, please see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_undeletion#Universist_Movement Universist 03:48, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Being the person that made the teenager comment, I was thinking of Scott, having seen his picture. I got him and BM confused (BM started the deletion and I was thinking of him). How could you take it to mean you, you did not express an opinion against I do not recall, you were just the admin that tallied the votes and did the deed. Here is an even more NPOV version of a Universism article that has been submitted to me: http://universist.org/npovuniversistmovement.htm As for using Wikipedia for publicity, that is not the case and not what is meant by my comment on the Faithless forum. If you dig on the Faithless forum you will find a comment from me in December stating that only 20 click-throughs or less came to universist.org via Wikipedia when the article existed, which is insignificant for us. Given that Wikipedia exists, and understanding what Wikipedia is and what is good for it, Universism should be in it. Not being in Wikipedia is bad for Wikipedia and looks weird for Universism given its status. Given this information, and that you seem a fair minded person based on your handling of the VfD, I would appreciate your reconsidering your vote Rossami. Universist 20:50, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Votes for deletion/Old

Please make sure you alert me before making changes. Otherwise the bot breaks. -- AllyUnion (talk) 10:11, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

VFD/Old/To close

Hey Rossami, just wanted to drop a note that I created a to close log list page that may be useful to you. Later! -- AllyUnion (talk) 23:24, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Oh, I'm sorry. I just noticed the VfD backlog and started closing them as I used to (before they were kept on day archives). I didn't consider what effects de-sectioning the page title might have. Cool Hand Luke 00:26, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)