Talk:Observation.org: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:15, 29 December 2023

Biology Unassessed

	Biology portal Observation.org is part of the WikiProject Biology, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to biology on Wikipedia. Leave messages on the WikiProject talk page.BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject BiologyTemplate:WikiProject BiologyBiology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ecology Unassessed

	Ecology portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Ecology, an effort to create, expand, organize, and improve ecology-related articles.EcologyWikipedia:WikiProject EcologyTemplate:WikiProject EcologyEcology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Portals

	This page is within the scope of WikiProject Portals, a collaborative effort to improve portals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortalsWikipedia:WikiProject PortalsTemplate:WikiProject PortalsPortals articles
???	This article does not require a rating on the project's quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	See also: List of Portals

Organizations Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Submission declined on 26 December 2023

I tried to improve the article mainly in terms of public perception and some other minor points. I think it should work this way.Bikerhiker75 (talk) 09:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:NCORP and WP:GNG Jeraxmoira (talk) 10:22, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

In my perception meanwhile there are enough reliable published secondary sources to prove notability and to match WP:NCORP and WP:GNG. What else exactly would you expect? Bikerhiker75 (talk) 06:49, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you are related to Draft:Observation.org in any way or was recruited by User:Dyve, Please follow WP:COIEDIT and disclose the same. I would advise you to use the {{edit COI}} template to propose changes on talk pages, or by posting a note at the COI noticeboard, so that they can be peer reviewed.

To answer your question, please share your 3 best sources WP:THREE here which may help the AfC reviewer to check if they meet WP:NCORP Jeraxmoira (talk) 06:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My relationship to Observation.org is easy to explain: I am member of the Bund Naturschutz in Bayern (BN). In the BN magazine of November Observation.org was recommended as well as on the website. This way I made an account there and downloaded ObsIdentify. I found it very useful. Beeing an author on de.wikipedia for some years I noticed that there was no article yet and created one. I wrote an email to the office and asked if I could get the logo anyhow. That's how we got in contact. When this draft was declined user:Dyve asked me to help out. I agreed for the same reasons I wrote the article in the de.wikipedia: Observation deserves an article, WP should have it. I've already put in a lot of work and can assure you that nobody pays for it. I do it as a volunteer for a good cause.

I will select three sources out of the 40 and share them to WP:THREE. Bikerhiker75 (talk) 08:15, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 :::If you are related to [[Draft:Observation.org]] in any way or was recruited by User:Dyve, Please follow [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|WP:COIEDIT]] and disclose the same. I would advise you to use the {{[[Template:Edit COI|edit COI]]}} template to propose changes on talk pages, or by posting a note at the COI noticeboard, so that they can be peer reviewed.
 :::To answer your question, please share your 3 best sources [[WP:THREE]] here which may help the AfC reviewer to check if they meet [[WP:NCORP]] [[User:Jeraxmoira|Jeraxmoira]] ([[User talk:Jeraxmoira|talk]]) 06:53, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
+::::My relationship to Observation.org is easy to explain: I am member of the [https://www.bund-naturschutz.de Bund Naturschutz in Bayern (BN)]. In the BN magazine of November Observation.org was recommended as well as on the [https://www.bund-naturschutz.de/observation-test website]. This way I made an account there and downloaded ObsIdentify. I found it very useful. Beeing an author on de.wikipedia for some years I noticed that there was no article yet and created [https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Observation_International one]. I wrote an email to the office and asked if I could get the logo anyhow. That's how we got in contact. When this draft was declined user:Dyve asked me to help out. I agreed for the same reasons I wrote the article in the de.wikipedia: Observation deserves an article, WP should have it. I've already put in a lot of work and can assure you that nobody pays for it. I do it as a volunteer for a good cause.
+::::I will select three sources out of the 40 and share them to WP:THREE. [[User:Bikerhiker75|Bikerhiker75]] ([[User talk:Bikerhiker75|talk]]) 08:15, 29 December 2023 (UTC)