Jump to content

User talk:Shoessss: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Can I get a comment from your side?: == Can I get a comment from your side? ==
Line 397: Line 397:
Hi. How is it going? Could I ask you for a comment since you can be neutral here. I am having some hard times with [[User:Gooddays]]. He is massively tagging article with unref and cleanup templates, although a great part of the articles are in fact referenced and do not require cleanup, at least not an obvious one. Any attempts to clear this out have been met with an reaction that I consider a rude provocation (or with blanking user talk). Can you have a look? Thanks. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi. How is it going? Could I ask you for a comment since you can be neutral here. I am having some hard times with [[User:Gooddays]]. He is massively tagging article with unref and cleanup templates, although a great part of the articles are in fact referenced and do not require cleanup, at least not an obvious one. Any attempts to clear this out have been met with an reaction that I consider a rude provocation (or with blanking user talk). Can you have a look? Thanks. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
:::Good, and you guy? I think you have a well-intentioned new editor here. I did look over the articles he/she was tagging, and your right. Just a tad over the top there :-). I left a note on the user’s page. Hope it helps. <font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></font> 14:01, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
:::Good, and you guy? I think you have a well-intentioned new editor here. I did look over the articles he/she was tagging, and your right. Just a tad over the top there :-). I left a note on the user’s page. Hope it helps. <font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></font> 14:01, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
:::: Thanks, I hope it helps as well. Just keep an eye on the situation for a while, just in case, ok? I'm doing fine, I'm just a little fed up with the snow we have in Ljubljana at the moment, the spring should be here already... So much about [[global warming]]... :-) --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:06, 24 March 2008




3RR complaint filed against User:Chriscohen

fyi: I've filed a complaint at WP:AN/3RR. He reverted you within 2 hours. Jheald (talk) 10:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


___________________________________________________________________

Hi, how are you?

As you said before: the article must stays.

For how long the article will have that warning on the first page?

The article Cohen Modal Cluster Haplotype, indicates that both J1 and J2 Cohanim share the same Unique Event Polymorphism and share a common ancestor with 3.000 years a go.

J1 Kohanim have a standard signature (Cohem Modal Haplotype) of 6 marks. Now, J2 have only one-step mutation over one specif allele. With 3000 years, this one-step mutation is perfect understandable.


"It is interesting to estimate the correct time at which Cohen chromossomes were derived from a commom ancestral chromossome (coalescence time). Under 'stepwise mutations' the average squared difference (ASD) in allele size among all current chromossome and the ancestral haplotype, averaged over loci, has an expectation of T, where is the mutation rate and T the coalescence time. "

"The 95% confidence interval places the origin of priestly Y-Chromossomes, in J1 and J2, sometime during or shortly before the first Temple period in Jewish history (2,100-3,250).According to Jewish Tradition, following the Exodus from Egypt, the tribe of Levi, of which Moses was a member, were assigned special religious responsabilities, and males descendents of Aaron, his brother, were selected to serve as Priests (Cohanim)."

NOW: This article is 100% scientif facts from the toppest team in the world. (THIS GUYS DO NOT ACCEPT THIS, AND FOLLOW A UNKWON "MAN ALLEGATIONS" FROM A COMPLETY ONE UNCREDIBLE PERSON.

This info that I used for the article is: Origins of Old Testaments Priests - Nature , Volume 394 -9 de July 1998. Authors: Karl Skorecki / Bruce Rapparport Faculty of Medicine and Research Institute, Technion, Haifa 31096, Israel; Mark G. Thomas / The Centre for Genetic Anthropology, Departament of Biology and Anthropology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; Haim Ben-Amit/Rambam Medical Centre, Haifa 31096, Israel; Turdor Parfitt / University of London, London WC1H OXC, UK; Neil Brandman and David. B. Goldstein/ University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK


Now, please note the (THIS SAME GUYS ALSO USE THE SAME REFERENCES, SAME BOOK AND SAME AUTHORS, BUT THEY SIMPLY DELETE INFO THAT THEY DONT LIKE, AND DONT WANT TO BEALIVE)

Please check this all. I want my article to stay or merge. Anyone of this options, but please dont let them delete this article. I accept to merge, if its okay, otherwise, leave the article. PLEASE HELP!--Chris Cohen / Jornalist / President of Jornal Goyaz, founded in 1884, with 124 years on brazilian market. / President of the Brazilian Association of Cohanim. (talk) 00:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)--[reply]

Hello Chris, first I just read your response to DGG's request for placing your findings/contentions in more laymen’s terms. Moreover, thank you very much for your input. Give me awhile to absorb. As I mentioned earlier, genetics is not my strong point. However, your writing style and talent for explanation is a talent I wish I had! Regarding the Afd tag, sorry to say, it will remain on the article, until a clear consensus of the community is obtained. At this point, you have several, extremely respected and knowledgeable editors and administrators involved in the articles discussion. I can honestly say that the article will be judged fairly. Please be patient! Typically, a decision to either Keep or Delete an article is made within 7 days. I hope this helps. Moreover, either way the decision goes, I hope this is not the last time, or the only article you edit. A talent like yours should not be wasted. Shoessss |  Chat  01:28, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

___________________________________________________________________

Hi, thanks for your words. I appreciated!

English is my secong language. I am from Brazil.

I need your help on the article that I wrote: Cohen Modal Cluster Haplotype. Dont let them delete my work. I accept merge but not delete.

The tag is alredy there for 7 days... or so... When and who will decide about the future of my article?

See ya,

Take Care,

G-od bless you


Please leave me a message on my talk page!


--Chris Cohen / Jornalist / President of Jornal Goyaz, founded in 1884, with 124 years on brazilian market. / President of the Brazilian Association of Cohanim. (talk) 17:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]


_________________________________________________________________________________________


Hi, how are you again?

Sorry for my emotions! My bad! I will hold the horses next time! The problem is that, I am tired, I am by myself on this situation against this "mafia team". They are manipulating this article for a long time. It is time to stop them! The readers of Wikepedia is reading untrue infos based on false allegations! In my opinion, this must stop, as soon is possible! I am very worry about the quality of this article, thats why I step foward to help justice and true informations.

Thanks for everything that you did and are still doing for the sake of the readers! Sometime I get myself very sad and stressfull with this guys.

Now, are you going to do something about it?

Thanks! And I appreciate your help on this! Please leave me a message on my talk page! --Chris Cohen / Journalist / President of Jornal Goyaz, founded in 1884, with 124 years on brazilian market. / President of the Brazilian Association of Cohanim. (talk) 23:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RFA

Thanks for participating in my RFA, which closed successfully with 40 supports, 13 opposes, and 4 neutrals. For those of you who supported my RFA, I greatly appreciate it. For those who did not, I'm also thankful for your constructive criticism. If you need some advice or have some pointers for me, you know where to reach me! A special thank you to Majorly for all his time and effort he has placed in my nomination. Once again, thank you all for your helpful comments. Now off to new admin school! Cheers, Icestorm815Talk 01:15, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I put this in your hands. I am taking the article off my watchlist. Cheers. miranda 03:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL---Coward---No seriously, I understand. Take care and have a great day. Shoessss |  Chat  04:26, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't revert Mirandas talk again. She wants a break and doesn't want the old content restoring at the minute. Thanks, Ryan Postlethwaite 03:47, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Got her message - Loud and clear :-). Shoessss |  Chat  11:24, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

George Lang article

Hi there, thanks for not immediately flagging the article for deletion. Any advice you'd offer on improving/reorganizing it? I know the re-edit process must be pretty straightforward, but I'm rather new to Wikipedia; any tips you have would be appreciated. jgowdey

Comment – No problem – by the way, nice work on the article. Welcome to Wikipedia and hopefully, this is not the last time we see you here. Shoessss |  Chat  00:01, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stop editing my talk page

Stop editing my talk page. I blanked it on my own. 76.124.107.132 (talk) 02:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I Know and if you notice I reverted back. Sorry about that. Shoessss |  Chat  02:47, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. It is very kind of you. (I apologize for not replying to you earlier) I live in Nara,Japan. Japanese is my mother tongue. So, I may not write English correctly. If the page I editted has strong accents, I beg you to correct it.

Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours very truly, Shayuki (talk) 01:46, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – Do not worry about English Shayuki Mine is not that great either :-). Shoessss |  Chat  03:12, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio or GFDL?

Regarding [1], please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everholt (about a similar case). It seems that what you removed as a copyvio was available under the GFDL. Their main page says: "Content is available under GNU Free Documentation License.". Carcharoth (talk) 15:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Sorry to disagree, the wording is exactly from this cite [2]. Which the site states very specifically; "...For acknowledgements and references, see the Disclaimer & Bibliography page. Original content © copyright Mark Fisher 2005. All rights reserved. For conditions of reuse, see the Site FAQ." Thanks. Shoessss |  Chat  15:43, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
No apologies needed. I had been going by this, which stated that it came from Tolkien Gateway. I hadn't realised that it was also on Encyclopedia of Arda. Thanks for pointing that out. Carcharoth (talk) 16:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Bagamoyo worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Calton | Talk 15:38, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cohen Modal Cluster Haplotype

Hello. I see the debate is closed now. I have read the article and the discussion and I found myself pretty much incompetent to give a wise suggestion so I rather said nothing. Looking at the result of afd, it seems reasonable to me. Sorry I was not much of a help, maybe next time. Greetings. --Tone 20:13, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -Well hello Mr. Tone. First, sorry it took a day or two to get back to you. But real life keeps getting in the way! Thank you very much for looking into the article for me. Now, I do not feel so bad! If it was tad over your head, you can only imagine my predicament! However, all’s well that ends well. Both editors are unhappy with the finial decision, so I feel that the right one was made. Always believed if one individual comes out smiling after an opinion was voiced, it was probably the wrong outcome. In the mean time, you take care, and of course, you know, that you got off easy this time! The next time, I will get you involved at the very beginning and let you demonstrate your diplomatic skills and sit back in awe, and just take notes :-) . Shoessss |  Chat  04:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Invasion Comedy

Regarding the above article: I was aware that the article had been copied and pasted from the official site. However, the site states that "Comedian biography and DVD description text may be used under the GNU Free Documentation License", which seems to indicate that CSD G12 doesn't apply – at least, when I tagged it under that criterion, deletion was refused for that reason (though it's interesting to note that the GFDL note only appeared after I tagged it).

Please understand that I am in no way sorry to see this article go, as I have no fondness for self-promotional articles. I'm just concerned that someone might go to Deletion review about this, and we'd end up having to open an AfD again. --Sturm 10:18, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And in the few minute since I left this comment, it's been undeleted and the debate reopened. --Sturm 10:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Man, I got to get new glasses. I should have never missed that one. Thanks for the catch Canley & Sturm Sorry. Shoessss |  Chat  12:14, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA

Yeah, sure. I just wanted to give some clarification, not an argument or anything. αѕєηιηє t/c 15:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

size

It isn't easy. Basically, I'm struggling to bring my support criteria more in line with others that require a building. I go through and count additions. Time consuming and laborious unless the candidate has been foresightful enough to have listed articles they have created and so forth. it's not as onerous a requirement as it sounds. 300 edits of 100 bytes each would do it. It just seems more concrete than saying FA or GA participation. I also see Wikignome activities as helpful. I've done some of that. You can read many articles and only make a tiny change for each. Sometimes you review articles that need no change. So it does help to understand what article building is about. If that's too stringent, I will cut it back. How do you measure article building? Do you see it as a concern? How can a better modify this or should I throw it out? Dlohcierekim 15:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - I was looking for quick and easy way. But I guess it is like a lot of things in life, just have to roll-up your sleeves and get your hands dirty. Your comments do make me rethink my deletion of my trophy wall with Articles I created section. But hey, I’ll save that for when and if I ever get involved at the administration level. And thanks again. Shoessss |  Chat  15:42, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome. Dlohcierekim 15:44, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you very much for your strong support for my admin application, which recently closed successfully (36/3/1). I hope I can continue to justify the confidence that you have placed in me. If there is any way that I can help out more, please drop me a line. Thanks again. - 52 Pickup (deal) 22:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drop Weapon

Hi Shoessss. Let me know if you want help cleaning up Drop_weapon. Cheers, Noah 07:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - Hey Noah, I have actually been talking to a few other editors about expanding the scope of this subject. The term Drop weapon is extremely close to a similar phrase, called Throw Away. This term is used in a similar context to Drop weapon here stateside, to what many of the major police departments do in comparable circumstances. I should start the reworking of the current piece in the next week or two. And of course, any and all help will be appreciated. Thanks again. Shoessss |  Chat  03:16, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ritual Exsanguination at the hands of the community

No. Actually, I was referring to to the death of a thousand cuts that I am currently undergoing. However, you did get me a little dizzy with Jouster . Seriously, you have every right to strike and restrike if you wish; your opinion is just as important as anyone's and you should never feel any pressure to conform. Wikipedia os your community as it is mine and everyone else's; that's one of the things that makes it so great. -- Avi (talk) 03:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL - I’m sorry I laugh so much, but I just get a kick out of the drama that does go on at Rfa’s. Some want it so bad, not to mention name's. However, what I came to realize, and hopefully the unsuccessful candidates will too, is that I, as a lowly editor, actually have more options than you, who are part of the establishment. Power to the masses :-). And if I get cared away from time to time, hey, I’m just an editor. Take care and just remember, at the 1,001 cut it doesn’t hurt anymore :-). Shoessss |  Chat  04:19, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, at least at m:OTRS I get triple what I do here……hey, wait a gosh-darned second!!! -- Avi (talk) 17:06, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


My RfA

File:David,larry.JPG My RFA
Thank you muchly for your support in my recent request for adminship, which was successfully closed on 76%, finishing at 73 supports, 23 opposes and 1 neutral. The supports were wonderful, and I will keep in mind the points made in the useful opposes and try to suppress the Larry David in me! Now I'm off to issue some cool down blocks, just to get my money's worth!

Kidding btw. All the best, Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 11:28, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Trout

I'm glad. Couldn't resist. Dlohcierekim 02:53, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Human Genetic History draft and vote

I created a draft version of WikiProject Human Genetic History; feel free to go to it and flesh it out. Also, given that there has been some comments about starting a task force inside of an existing WikiProject vs. a full-blown project, I've started an informal poll on the WikiProject proposal page. – Swid (talk · edits) 00:31, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
William-Henry Gauvin
Conway Cabal
Walter the Penniless
Disc golf
Military camouflage
The Nut Gatherers
La Danse
John Osteen
Philadelphia Stars (baseball)
The Knitting Girl
Morogoro
Murray Baron
Cupidon (1875)
Alexander I of Epirus
University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus
Tage William-Olsson
Alone in the World
Texian
List of places named for Benjamin Franklin
Cleanup
Bulleh Shah
Heroic medicine
Tejano music
Merge
Clark Clifford
Gun truck
The size of Wales
Add Sources
Lil Hardin Armstrong
John Pickering
Thomas J. Dodd
Wikify
Steerage
Min Min light
Threave Rovers F.C.
Expand
Maccabees
John Lubbock, 2nd Baron Avebury
Fugitive Slave Law of 1850

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:42, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thanks for your support. - J Greb (talk) 22:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA - Discospinster

Thank you so much for your support in my RfA, which was successful with a final count of 70/1/1! ... discospinster talk 23:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs
Conway Cabal
Philadelphia Athletics (American Association)
University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus
Disc golf
Morogoro
Chad Lewis
List of places named for Benjamin Franklin
Horse culture
Texian
Philadelphia Stars (baseball)
Simon Gratz High School
Dale Coyne
Palm Beach Cardinals
List of University of Texas at Austin people
Kibawe, Bukidnon
Lauryn Hill
Hospital Corporation of America
St. Louis All Stars
American Negro League
Cleanup
Tejano music
Vanity plate
Delaware North Companies
Merge
Ceramic plate
Clark Clifford
Computer hardware
Add Sources
Stephanie Wilson
Jerry Lewis
Indonesian car number plates
Wikify
Steerage
Star & Buc Wild
Dorian Gray
Expand
Divergent boundary
State Fair of Texas
Rokenbok

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:16, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Biblical banishment

Well, thank you for the explanation. I disagree (as you can see!), but no hard feelings on either side, I trust. Biruitorul (talk) 22:37, 18 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As always - there are two sides to every story. Always appreciate, well thought out arguments and opinions. Take care. Shoessss |  Chat  00:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On an unrelated note: you've been doing tremendously good work with improving this article. In case the article does get deleted, and in case the closing admin forgets (or is unwilling) to make a copy of the deleted text on a subpage of your user space, then do feel free to let me know as I would be more than happy to do so. Cheers. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 02:50, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Thanks PeruvianLlama I do appreciate the offer. Right now I am half-hoping it stays :-), I am only fighting the fight because the topic has really peaked my interest, and if it does stay, it will be available for other editors, with more brians than me, to improve upon. On the other hand, if it is deleted, I was looking to take the piece in a more derivative manner and start introducing the economical and social aspects of what banishment meant, in both the Biblical and social/economic sense of that time, and how it has influenced both modern religious and political viewpoints. After that wordy explanation, the short and sweet answer to your offer is thank you very much :-). Shoessss |  Chat  03:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re:RFA questions

Nah, IMHO it shows whether the candidate can handle a little fun here and there. Everyone here is a real person, and nobody will stay and edit if there's no fun to be had. =) But it can get out of hand...Malinaccier (talk) 04:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No need to call enough, there's a reason I didn't respond to his last thousand words on his rationale. VanTucky 05:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I have adequately defended my stance and will discuss with the candidate my concerns to see if he can convince me otherwise. Best, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 05:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes- There is a reason to call ENOUGH! The Rfa is a discussion on the candidate’s ability or inability to have the additional tools. It is not the forum to discuses’ personal or philosophical differences. When a sidebar discussion, distracts from the primary goal of the forum, which your discussion has done, than YES, that is ENOUGH!. Shoessss |  Chat  05:07, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I whole-heartedly agree. As you can see on my talk page, TPH has thoroughly addressed my concerns and I have in turn responded positively in the RfA accordingly. Best, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 05:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
LOL - Thank you – You guys/gals where given me a headache – and all I wanted was to go to bed! Take care and may there be more Happy Editing in your future :-). Shoessss |  Chat  05:24, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You do the same, I'm now on a source search.  :) Best, --Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 05:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks


March 2008 edition of the WikiProject Germany newsletter

- Newsletter Bot Talk 15:40, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This newsletter is delivered by a bot to all members of WikiProject Germany. If you do not want to receive this newsletter in the future, please leave a note at the talk page of the Outreach department so we can come up with a better spamlist solution. Thank you, - Newsletter Bot Talk 15:40, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signature

I'm constantly confusing you for Pedro. Do you mind changing your signature a bit, even if it just a minor colour change? Thanks. Spebi (talk) 05:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL – I have actually discussed this with Pedro :  Chat  , and we came to a mutual agreement. If either one of us ever embarrassed ourselves to the point of Banishment, one of us will have to change our signature. In that I have become more active here at Wikipedia and it seems that one of us has been generating a little bit more controversy, not saying who. How does this work. ShoesssS Talk
. It was my original signature. And to be honest, I still like it. ShoesssS Talk 05:47, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that's much better. Thanks :) Spebi (talk) 06:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Only for you Spebi and only for you :-). ShoesssS Talk 08:46, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can I get a comment from your side?

Hi. How is it going? Could I ask you for a comment since you can be neutral here. I am having some hard times with User:Gooddays. He is massively tagging article with unref and cleanup templates, although a great part of the articles are in fact referenced and do not require cleanup, at least not an obvious one. Any attempts to clear this out have been met with an reaction that I consider a rude provocation (or with blanking user talk). Can you have a look? Thanks. --Tone 13:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good, and you guy? I think you have a well-intentioned new editor here. I did look over the articles he/she was tagging, and your right. Just a tad over the top there :-). I left a note on the user’s page. Hope it helps. ShoesssS Talk 14:01, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I hope it helps as well. Just keep an eye on the situation for a while, just in case, ok? I'm doing fine, I'm just a little fed up with the snow we have in Ljubljana at the moment, the spring should be here already... So much about global warming... :-) --Tone 14:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]