User talk:Shoessss: Difference between revisions
→Can I get a comment from your side?: == Can I get a comment from your side? == |
|||
Line 397: | Line 397: | ||
Hi. How is it going? Could I ask you for a comment since you can be neutral here. I am having some hard times with [[User:Gooddays]]. He is massively tagging article with unref and cleanup templates, although a great part of the articles are in fact referenced and do not require cleanup, at least not an obvious one. Any attempts to clear this out have been met with an reaction that I consider a rude provocation (or with blanking user talk). Can you have a look? Thanks. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC) |
Hi. How is it going? Could I ask you for a comment since you can be neutral here. I am having some hard times with [[User:Gooddays]]. He is massively tagging article with unref and cleanup templates, although a great part of the articles are in fact referenced and do not require cleanup, at least not an obvious one. Any attempts to clear this out have been met with an reaction that I consider a rude provocation (or with blanking user talk). Can you have a look? Thanks. --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 13:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
:::Good, and you guy? I think you have a well-intentioned new editor here. I did look over the articles he/she was tagging, and your right. Just a tad over the top there :-). I left a note on the user’s page. Hope it helps. <font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></font> 14:01, 24 March 2008 (UTC) |
:::Good, and you guy? I think you have a well-intentioned new editor here. I did look over the articles he/she was tagging, and your right. Just a tad over the top there :-). I left a note on the user’s page. Hope it helps. <font face="Times New Roman">[[User:Shoessss|'''S'''''hoesss'''''S''']] <sup>[[User talk:Shoessss|''Talk'']]</sup></font> 14:01, 24 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
:::: Thanks, I hope it helps as well. Just keep an eye on the situation for a while, just in case, ok? I'm doing fine, I'm just a little fed up with the snow we have in Ljubljana at the moment, the spring should be here already... So much about [[global warming]]... :-) --'''[[User:Tone|Tone]]''' 14:06, 24 March 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:06, 24 March 2008
This is Shoessss's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
3RR complaint filed against User:Chriscohenfyi: I've filed a complaint at WP:AN/3RR. He reverted you within 2 hours. Jheald (talk) 10:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
Hi, how are you? As you said before: the article must stays. For how long the article will have that warning on the first page? The article Cohen Modal Cluster Haplotype, indicates that both J1 and J2 Cohanim share the same Unique Event Polymorphism and share a common ancestor with 3.000 years a go. J1 Kohanim have a standard signature (Cohem Modal Haplotype) of 6 marks. Now, J2 have only one-step mutation over one specif allele. With 3000 years, this one-step mutation is perfect understandable.
"The 95% confidence interval places the origin of priestly Y-Chromossomes, in J1 and J2, sometime during or shortly before the first Temple period in Jewish history (2,100-3,250).According to Jewish Tradition, following the Exodus from Egypt, the tribe of Levi, of which Moses was a member, were assigned special religious responsabilities, and males descendents of Aaron, his brother, were selected to serve as Priests (Cohanim)." NOW: This article is 100% scientif facts from the toppest team in the world. (THIS GUYS DO NOT ACCEPT THIS, AND FOLLOW A UNKWON "MAN ALLEGATIONS" FROM A COMPLETY ONE UNCREDIBLE PERSON. This info that I used for the article is: Origins of Old Testaments Priests - Nature , Volume 394 -9 de July 1998. Authors: Karl Skorecki / Bruce Rapparport Faculty of Medicine and Research Institute, Technion, Haifa 31096, Israel; Mark G. Thomas / The Centre for Genetic Anthropology, Departament of Biology and Anthropology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK; Haim Ben-Amit/Rambam Medical Centre, Haifa 31096, Israel; Turdor Parfitt / University of London, London WC1H OXC, UK; Neil Brandman and David. B. Goldstein/ University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PS, UK
Please check this all. I want my article to stay or merge. Anyone of this options, but please dont let them delete this article. I accept to merge, if its okay, otherwise, leave the article. PLEASE HELP!--Chris Cohen / Jornalist / President of Jornal Goyaz, founded in 1884, with 124 years on brazilian market. / President of the Brazilian Association of Cohanim. (talk) 00:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)--
___________________________________________________________________ Hi, thanks for your words. I appreciated! English is my secong language. I am from Brazil. I need your help on the article that I wrote: Cohen Modal Cluster Haplotype. Dont let them delete my work. I accept merge but not delete. The tag is alredy there for 7 days... or so... When and who will decide about the future of my article? See ya, Take Care, G-od bless you
Sorry for my emotions! My bad! I will hold the horses next time! The problem is that, I am tired, I am by myself on this situation against this "mafia team". They are manipulating this article for a long time. It is time to stop them! The readers of Wikepedia is reading untrue infos based on false allegations! In my opinion, this must stop, as soon is possible! I am very worry about the quality of this article, thats why I step foward to help justice and true informations. Thanks for everything that you did and are still doing for the sake of the readers! Sometime I get myself very sad and stressfull with this guys. Now, are you going to do something about it? Thanks! And I appreciate your help on this! Please leave me a message on my talk page! --Chris Cohen / Journalist / President of Jornal Goyaz, founded in 1884, with 124 years on brazilian market. / President of the Brazilian Association of Cohanim. (talk) 23:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC) RFA
I put this in your hands. I am taking the article off my watchlist. Cheers. miranda 03:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
Please don't revert Mirandas talk again. She wants a break and doesn't want the old content restoring at the minute. Thanks, Ryan Postlethwaite 03:47, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
George Lang articleHi there, thanks for not immediately flagging the article for deletion. Any advice you'd offer on improving/reorganizing it? I know the re-edit process must be pretty straightforward, but I'm rather new to Wikipedia; any tips you have would be appreciated. jgowdey
Stop editing my talk pageStop editing my talk page. I blanked it on my own. 76.124.107.132 (talk) 02:45, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello. It is very kind of you. (I apologize for not replying to you earlier) I live in Nara,Japan. Japanese is my mother tongue. So, I may not write English correctly. If the page I editted has strong accents, I beg you to correct it. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours very truly, Shayuki (talk) 01:46, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Copyvio or GFDL?Regarding [1], please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everholt (about a similar case). It seems that what you removed as a copyvio was available under the GFDL. Their main page says: "Content is available under GNU Free Documentation License.". Carcharoth (talk) 15:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Bagamoyo worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Calton | Talk 15:38, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Cohen Modal Cluster HaplotypeHello. I see the debate is closed now. I have read the article and the discussion and I found myself pretty much incompetent to give a wise suggestion so I rather said nothing. Looking at the result of afd, it seems reasonable to me. Sorry I was not much of a help, maybe next time. Greetings. --Tone 20:13, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Indian Invasion Comedy
RfAYeah, sure. I just wanted to give some clarification, not an argument or anything. αѕєηιηє t/c 15:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC) sizeIt isn't easy. Basically, I'm struggling to bring my support criteria more in line with others that require a building. I go through and count additions. Time consuming and laborious unless the candidate has been foresightful enough to have listed articles they have created and so forth. it's not as onerous a requirement as it sounds. 300 edits of 100 bytes each would do it. It just seems more concrete than saying FA or GA participation. I also see Wikignome activities as helpful. I've done some of that. You can read many articles and only make a tiny change for each. Sometimes you review articles that need no change. So it does help to understand what article building is about. If that's too stringent, I will cut it back. How do you measure article building? Do you see it as a concern? How can a better modify this or should I throw it out? Dlohcierekim 15:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
My RfAThank you very much for your strong support for my admin application, which recently closed successfully (36/3/1). I hope I can continue to justify the confidence that you have placed in me. If there is any way that I can help out more, please drop me a line. Thanks again. - 52 Pickup (deal) 22:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC) Drop WeaponHi Shoessss. Let me know if you want help cleaning up Drop_weapon. Cheers, —Noah 07:23, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
Ritual Exsanguination at the hands of the communityNo. Actually, I was referring to to the death of a thousand cuts that I am currently undergoing. However, you did get me a little dizzy with Jouster . Seriously, you have every right to strike and restrike if you wish; your opinion is just as important as anyone's and you should never feel any pressure to conform. Wikipedia os your community as it is mine and everyone else's; that's one of the things that makes it so great. -- Avi (talk) 03:41, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
My RfA
TroutI'm glad. Couldn't resist. Dlohcierekim 02:53, 7 March 2008 (UTC) WikiProject Human Genetic History draft and voteI created a draft version of WikiProject Human Genetic History; feel free to go to it and flesh it out. Also, given that there has been some comments about starting a task force inside of an existing WikiProject vs. a full-blown project, I've started an informal poll on the WikiProject proposal page. – Swid (talk · edits) 00:31, 9 March 2008 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:42, 10 March 2008 (UTC) My RfAThanks for your support. - J Greb (talk) 22:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC) RfA - DiscospinsterThank you so much for your support in my RfA, which was successful with a final count of 70/1/1! ... discospinster talk 23:49, 13 March 2008 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:16, 18 March 2008 (UTC) Biblical banishmentWell, thank you for the explanation. I disagree (as you can see!), but no hard feelings on either side, I trust. Biruitorul (talk) 22:37, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
On an unrelated note: you've been doing tremendously good work with improving this article. In case the article does get deleted, and in case the closing admin forgets (or is unwilling) to make a copy of the deleted text on a subpage of your user space, then do feel free to let me know as I would be more than happy to do so. Cheers. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 02:50, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Re:RFA questionsNah, IMHO it shows whether the candidate can handle a little fun here and there. Everyone here is a real person, and nobody will stay and edit if there's no fun to be had. =) But it can get out of hand...Malinaccier (talk) 04:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC) No need to call enough, there's a reason I didn't respond to his last thousand words on his rationale. VanTucky 05:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
RfA thanksOh snap, the DEA is an admin
March 2008 edition of the WikiProject Germany newsletter
This newsletter is delivered by a bot to all members of WikiProject Germany. If you do not want to receive this newsletter in the future, please leave a note at the talk page of the Outreach department so we can come up with a better spamlist solution. Thank you, - Newsletter Bot Talk 15:40, 23 March 2008 (UTC) SignatureI'm constantly confusing you for Pedro. Do you mind changing your signature a bit, even if it just a minor colour change? Thanks. Spebi (talk) 05:05, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Can I get a comment from your side?Hi. How is it going? Could I ask you for a comment since you can be neutral here. I am having some hard times with User:Gooddays. He is massively tagging article with unref and cleanup templates, although a great part of the articles are in fact referenced and do not require cleanup, at least not an obvious one. Any attempts to clear this out have been met with an reaction that I consider a rude provocation (or with blanking user talk). Can you have a look? Thanks. --Tone 13:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
|