User talk:Sennen goroshi: Difference between revisions

You have new messages (last change).

I have no problem with offensive language, as long as you don't call me a cunt. Call my edit a cunt - that's just fine. Too many people whine when they seem a word such as cunt, shit or fuck.

I do tend to delete messages when they are no longer relevant, so don't take offence if/when your message goes the way of the dodo

Before complaining about some borderline edit that I've made, please read: Wikipedia is not censored.

Recipe

Yeah alright, the recipe thing can go. It just appeared to be malicous at the time. (I didn't read the 'wikipedia is not a recipe book.' bit from your edit afterward.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by SamB135 (talk • contribs) 06:50, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! --SamB135 (talk) 06:37, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Consensus

It's a lot easier to build consensus if you contribute to the talk page instead of communicating exclusively by edit summaries. My objection is not to the content itself, but that it isn't appropriate to the Sippenhaft article. It's already in Collective punishment, which is a much more appropriate place for it. By your logic, we should include that paragraph in demolition, bulldozer, family, housing and urban planning as well. Orpheus (talk) 14:50, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

See you on the article talk page when you have time. Lets see if we can gain consensus or something Sennen goroshi (talk) 11:46, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

"You have new messages" box

Hi, just so you know, simulated MediaWiki interface messages are not allowed on user/talk pages as they tend to confuse people. ~ AmeIiorate _{U T C} @ 10:14, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Re:

Hi, Sennen, thank you for the interest on the article and fixing my grammatical errors. Well, that is Joseon people's point of view at that time toward "Japanese people in Joseon", not Japan. Some Joseon people still believed the pan-Asianism would be properly working if bad Japanese who also degraded Japan disappear like Ahn Jung-geun believed. So I think the sentence should be revised again. Thanks--Caspian blue (talk) 14:50, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Ah, now I understand - I think for the benefit of people who are not aware of the above, it should be made clear. Sennen goroshi (talk) 15:22, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Seems okay now. Thanks--Caspian blue (talk) 15:29, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Re:3RR

[1].--Tznkai (talk) 18:10, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

When I make statements on article talk pages, I tend not to name names as a matter of personal policy, with some exceptions, but in short: reversions happen all the time. There is no little counter flashing on someone's computer screen that says "This has been your Xth revert today." Thus, people are warned about 3RR before they are reported on AN3, especially when reported by someone in the midst of a content dispute. Otherwise it looks like, and often is an abuse of process. If you did not intend to abuse the process, good, and I apologize if you feel unfairly accused, I hope we're on the same page as far as that part of policy.--Tznkai (talk) 18:29, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

excuse my attitude

I was not exactly friendly. Please accept my apologies.

I don't agree with your reverting me, however that should not be an issue

Sennen goroshi (talk) 18:37, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Hi Sennen goroshi, apology accepted and no problem. Also, as I mentioned, I don't have a stance either way about those images being included. --Tom 19:05, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

I never noticed the spikey penis before.

you are a lot like me Sennen goroshi

i don't care what you call me i don't care what you say just take a look a my chat page (its preety bloody empty)and leave any mesages you want.--Mindoshawn (talk) 17:16, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Comment in CW article

...Please base your edits on facts not rumours and anti-Japanese bias.

Note that I reverted your edit because you seemingly deleted cited statements without any comments to justify it. It is not for as you said my "rumours and anti-Japanese bias", which is if anything completely unfounded. Sjschen (talk) 18:42, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Empress Myeongseong. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

You obviously hold a resentment against me per your failed attempt yesterday to remove your name at the RFCU. Well, you've known that you're not favored by editors. You do not even know the articles of the Korean history that you edit. I know you so attach to Japan in which provides your job, but well, here is an encyclopedia. You removed "properly" (which means reliable sources) sourced materials as labeling them OR and biased sources by your unique definition of "neutrality". Please do not repeat the same old game. When you violated 3RR at Nanking Massacre on Sept. 28, I did not report you to WP:AN3 from a good faith, but if you keep going such disruptive behavior and not self-revert, I make sure that you could not expect the same luck again.--Caspian blue (talk) 04:46, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

A few points.

1 please don't template me, a personal message is much better. 2 I was trying to improve the article in question, perhaps if you had addressed the issues you had with my edits instead of reverting me, then things would be easier. 3 I had no issue with you at the RCFU, my issues were with the new editor who I named. 4 I appreciate the good faith, with good faith on both sides perhaps problems can be solved by discussion, rather than ANI reports 5 I have undone some of my reverts and combined them into one revert, so that you do not have to be concerned about 3RR

Sennen goroshi (talk) 04:51, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

The 3RR notice is to prevent you from violating 3RR. When something is out of hand, the template could be helpful to grab your attention quickly. You have to get over the accusation made by the user because his additional report did not even go through. A hoax SSP file (actually alleged meatpuppet file) under my name by an indefinitely blocked troll at that time of filing is not even deleted (in that case, such files are usually deleted though). You have the problem, you should've asked the checkuser/clerk or the user who put your name. You still deleted chunk of information on Empress Myeongseong. You even altered the address of the "image link", which could be considered typical "vandalism". If you want to contest the reliable sources, you have to provide other reliable sources from other point of view and seek a discussion before making such drastic changes. I did not revert all your edits such as Prostitution in South Korea. So please do not try to waste our time again for nothing.--Caspian blue (talk) 05:08, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Empress Myeongseong

If you read some Korean or Chiene or Japanese, you could read my sources. All sources are official document from Korea. And see Talk:Empress Myeongseong, some discussion was discussed more than two years ago. I'm sorry I read your discussions.--Bukubku (talk) 13:53, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Sennen goroshi, you know what? How could this SPA read our discussion? That is very simple because you've also been watched by anti-Korean bashing site, 2channel people whenever something occurs between you and me. We're entertaining the people on live. My answer to your question is this.[2] You seem to read Japanese, so just follow this link.[3]--Caspian blue (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

OK. I will take a look at all sources - not that I can read much Kanji. Caspian, its nice that people are watching us - people only watch what they consider to be interesting - we must be very interesting people. Sennen goroshi (talk) 14:42, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

No kidding. I've been stalked and harassed by these people for one year including the obvious sock. You are just sometimes watched together because of me. You were very annoyed for your name being listed on the RFCU in one case, but they even operate http://www3.atwiki.jp/apple-tree/ the systematic stalking site dedicated to me. --Caspian blue (talk) 14:48, 8 October 2008 (UTC)