User talk:Thankful21&3: Difference between revisions
→August 2009: 3rr |
Thankful21&3 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|]] Please do not add [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]] or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles {{#if:Kent Hovind| as you apparently did to [[:Kent Hovind]]}}. Please cite a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] for all of your information. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:Uw-nor2 --> "All three and their spouses work in the ministry" ≠ "Mostly employing his own children and their spouses to serve the ministries operations". Additionally, the [http://www.uslaw.com/law_blogs/Religion%2BClause?blog=549 source you cited] makes no mention of RICO. <font face="Antiqua, serif">''[[User:Hrafn|Hrafn]]<sup>[[User talk:Hrafn|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Hrafn|Stalk]]</sub><sup>''('''[[M:Precisionism|P]]''')</sup></font> 07:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC) |
[[Image:Information.svg|25px|]] Please do not add [[Wikipedia:No original research|original research]] or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles {{#if:Kent Hovind| as you apparently did to [[:Kent Hovind]]}}. Please cite a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] for all of your information. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:Uw-nor2 --> "All three and their spouses work in the ministry" ≠ "Mostly employing his own children and their spouses to serve the ministries operations". Additionally, the [http://www.uslaw.com/law_blogs/Religion%2BClause?blog=549 source you cited] makes no mention of RICO. <font face="Antiqua, serif">''[[User:Hrafn|Hrafn]]<sup>[[User talk:Hrafn|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Hrafn|Stalk]]</sub><sup>''('''[[M:Precisionism|P]]''')</sup></font> 07:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
Hrafn you have a clear history of anti creationist meddling, and I believe you will be dealt with by an official, I am waiting to hear back from some. Obviously you have an agenda, but I am not "Kent Hovendite" I am just a guy that thinks that Wikipedia is better without the dogmatic brick walls of either nuts from the right or the left, I believe that balance is necessary for people to search out facts, and that neutrality is the goal of Wikipedia. I am going to stick with this, honestly you nuts have really pissed me off, with your quick erase tactics. |
|||
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[WP:Edit war|edit war]]'''{{#if:Kent Hovind|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Kent Hovind]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP|page protection]]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> You appear to be edit-warring with at least 4 editors there -- myself, Arthur Rubin, Farsight001 & NeilN. <font face="Antiqua, serif">''[[User:Hrafn|Hrafn]]<sup>[[User talk:Hrafn|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Hrafn|Stalk]]</sub><sup>''('''[[M:Precisionism|P]]''')</sup></font> 07:29, 27 August 2009 (UTC) |
[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] You currently appear to be engaged in an '''[[WP:Edit war|edit war]]'''{{#if:Kent Hovind|  according to the reverts you have made on [[:Kent Hovind]]}}. Note that the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the [[Wikipedia:Three-revert rule|three-revert rule]]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] to work towards wording and content that gains a [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek [[WP:DR|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[WP:PP|page protection]]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> You appear to be edit-warring with at least 4 editors there -- myself, Arthur Rubin, Farsight001 & NeilN. <font face="Antiqua, serif">''[[User:Hrafn|Hrafn]]<sup>[[User talk:Hrafn|Talk]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/Hrafn|Stalk]]</sub><sup>''('''[[M:Precisionism|P]]''')</sup></font> 07:29, 27 August 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 08:18, 27 August 2009
Welcome
|
August 2009
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Kent Hovind. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. "All three and their spouses work in the ministry" ≠ "Mostly employing his own children and their spouses to serve the ministries operations". Additionally, the source you cited makes no mention of RICO. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 07:21, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Hrafn you have a clear history of anti creationist meddling, and I believe you will be dealt with by an official, I am waiting to hear back from some. Obviously you have an agenda, but I am not "Kent Hovendite" I am just a guy that thinks that Wikipedia is better without the dogmatic brick walls of either nuts from the right or the left, I believe that balance is necessary for people to search out facts, and that neutrality is the goal of Wikipedia. I am going to stick with this, honestly you nuts have really pissed me off, with your quick erase tactics.
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kent Hovind. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. You appear to be edit-warring with at least 4 editors there -- myself, Arthur Rubin, Farsight001 & NeilN. HrafnTalkStalk(P) 07:29, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:25, 27 August 2009 (UTC)