Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BitchX: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m deletion sorting |
keep |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet|list of Internet-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] ([[User talk:Thryduulf|talk]]) 10:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)<!--Template:Delsort--></small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Internet|list of Internet-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] ([[User talk:Thryduulf|talk]]) 10:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)<!--Template:Delsort--></small> |
||
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] ([[User talk:Thryduulf|talk]]) 10:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)<!--Template:Delsort--></small> |
*<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Thryduulf|Thryduulf]] ([[User talk:Thryduulf|talk]]) 10:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)<!--Template:Delsort--></small> |
||
*'''Keep with caveat''': I am not a tech guru, but wikipedia is full of similar articles about IRC clients, bitorrent clients, etc., so consensus seems to be clear that such articles should exist. (Just look at [[Comparison of Internet Relay Chat clients]] and the vast number of blue links in it, that took serious geek time to prepare). And I did some searching and found numerous references to this being a popular linux IRC client, which I added to article--so A7 Speedy is not appropriate--and that seems notable in terms of these kinds of articles. --[[User:Milowent|Milowent]] ([[User talk:Milowent|talk]]) 16:16, 29 September 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:16, 29 September 2009
- BitchX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
DELETE. This software is clearly not notable. Yes, there are three "references" cited, but please do not be fooled. They are all passing mentions of the product about how easily exploited it is. And by passing I mean two sentences a pop with exception to the third "source" which is really just a security bulletin (email) from the Slackware Security Team. [1] Fail, fail, fail. JBsupreme (talk) 06:33, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed, I passed on nominating this earlier, but since nominated, it should go. Miami33139 (talk) 07:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - (A7) article does not assert notability. Failing that, it doesn't pass WP:N due to not establishing notability with multiple significant secondary sources. - DustFormsWords (talk) 08:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 10:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 10:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep with caveat: I am not a tech guru, but wikipedia is full of similar articles about IRC clients, bitorrent clients, etc., so consensus seems to be clear that such articles should exist. (Just look at Comparison of Internet Relay Chat clients and the vast number of blue links in it, that took serious geek time to prepare). And I did some searching and found numerous references to this being a popular linux IRC client, which I added to article--so A7 Speedy is not appropriate--and that seems notable in terms of these kinds of articles. --Milowent (talk) 16:16, 29 September 2009 (UTC)