User talk:Joeymattii: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 17:33, 11 June 2013

June 2013

Hello, I'm Tentinator. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Jane Censoria Cajes because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Tentinator 08:44, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joeymattii. How come you keep removing text from Jane Censoria Cajes‎ and placing an inappropriate picture on there? If you keep edit warring over this you will suffer from the WP:3RR rule that says that you are not allowed to keep reverting over article content. Are you attempting to whitewash| the subject? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Joeymattii, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Joeymattii! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:18, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jane Censoria Cajes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Jane Censoria Cajes. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 [[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Jane Censoria Cajes]]. Your edits appear to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. <!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --><!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning2 -->  &mdash; [[User:MusikAnimal|<font color="black"><b><i>MusikAnimal</i></b></font>]] [[User talk:MusikAnimal|<font color="green" ><sup><b>talk</b></sup></font>]] 17:28, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
+[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, and [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome to Wikipedia]]. You appear to be engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]] with one or more editors&#32; according to your reverts at [[:Jane Censoria Cajes]]. Although repeatedly [[Help:Reverting|reverting or undoing]] another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the [[Wikipedia:Editing policy|normal editing process]], and often creates animosity between editors.  Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a  [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] on the [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]].
+If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the [[WP:3RR|three-revert rule]], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a  [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|block]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft --> &mdash; [[User:MusikAnimal|<font color="black"><b><i>MusikAnimal</i></b></font>]] [[User talk:MusikAnimal|<font color="green" ><sup><b>talk</b></sup></font>]] 17:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)