Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m →Reliable sources: Adding a link. |
I know it is normal to have the banner at the top, but for a page intended to inform unskilled editors in the fewest possible words it is a distraction |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
<noinclude> |
<noinclude> |
||
<center>{{For|an explanation of the title of this page|The answer to life, the universe, and everything}}</center> |
<center>{{For|an explanation of the title of this page|The answer to life, the universe, and everything}}</center> |
||
⚫ | |||
</noinclude> |
</noinclude> |
||
<center> |
<center> |
||
Line 23: | Line 22: | ||
Nothing written by the subject or paid for by the subject. Not their website. Not a press release. [[WP:PRIMARY|Primary sources]] aren't enough: we require something '''[[WP:INDY|independent]]'''. |
Nothing written by the subject or paid for by the subject. Not their website. Not a press release. [[WP:PRIMARY|Primary sources]] aren't enough: we require something '''[[WP:INDY|independent]]'''. |
||
<noinclude> |
|||
⚫ | |||
</noinclude> |
|||
{{Policy summaries}} |
{{Policy summaries}} |
||
Revision as of 13:41, 5 December 2013
Articles require significant coverage
in reliable sources
Significant coverage
We need references that discuss the subject – directly, in detail. Not just passing mentions, directory listings, or any old thing that happens to have the name in it. And we need several references - not just one. These sources show that the subject is notable.
Reliable sources
We need sources generally trusted to tell the truth. Major newspapers. Factual, widely-published books. Or other high-quality mainstream publications which are careful about fact-checking and accuracy. Not: forums, fansites, MySpace, Facebook, or most blogs. Good sources make the text verifiable.
Independent
Nothing written by the subject or paid for by the subject. Not their website. Not a press release. Primary sources aren't enough: we require something independent.
This is an information page. It is not an encyclopedic article, nor one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of Wikipedia's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect differing levels of consensus and vetting. |