Wikipedia:The answer to life, the universe, and everything: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
WhatamIdoing (talk | contribs) |
template:disputed, customized for an "information page" |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ {{{|safesubst:}}}#invoke:Unsubst||$N=Disputed |date=__DATE__ |$B= |
|||
<!--{{Disputed}} begin-->{{Ambox |
|||
| name = Disputed |
|||
| image = [[File:Gnome-searchtool.svg|45px]] |
|||
| subst = <includeonly>{{subst:substcheck}}</includeonly> |
|||
| type = content |
|||
| class = ambox-disputed |
|||
| issue = This information page's '''factual accuracy is disputed'''. |
|||
| fix = Please help to ensure that disputed statements are [[WP:RS|reliably sourced]]. See the relevant discussion on the [[{{{talkpage|{{TALKPAGENAME}}#RfC: Is this an information page or is it an essay?}}}|talk page]]. |
|||
| small = {{#ifeq:{{{what|}}}|section|left}} |
|||
| date = {{{date|}}} |
|||
}}<!--{{Disputed}} end--> |
|||
}} |
|||
<noinclude> |
<noinclude> |
||
{{information page|WP:VRS|WP:42|WP:ANS}}<br /> |
{{information page|WP:VRS|WP:42|WP:ANS}}<br /> |
||
Revision as of 19:45, 9 February 2014
 | This information page's factual accuracy is disputed. |
 | This is an information page. It is not an encyclopedic article, nor one of Wikipedia's policies or guidelines; rather, its purpose is to explain certain aspects of Wikipedia's norms, customs, technicalities, or practices. It may reflect differing levels of consensus and vetting. |
Articles require significant coverage
in reliable sources
Significant coverage
We need references that discuss the subject – directly, in detail. Not just passing mentions, directory listings, or any old thing that happens to have the name in it. And we need multiple references - not just one. These sources show that the subject is notable.
Reliable sources
We need sources generally trusted to tell the truth. Major newspapers. Factual, widely-published books. Or other high-quality mainstream publications which are careful about fact-checking and accuracy. Not: forums, fansites, MySpace, Facebook, or most blogs. Good sources make the text verifiable.
Independent
Nothing written by the subject or paid for by the subject. Not their website. Not a press release. We require something independent.
See also
