User talk:Jawwad khan marwat: Difference between revisions

Welcome to Wikipedia. Hello, Jawwad khan marwat, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: The Five Pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Editing tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

Wikimedia Foundation

--ΜιĿːtalk 08:00, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

Rohilla Page

In Wikipedia, comments has to added in Discussion page and not in article page. While you add sinature a small commect in Edit Summary. You can check other pages for the Wikipedia format. I will remove you signatures from the Rohilla page. Siddiqui 17:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Nonsense of Mian Khel

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Mian Khel, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Mian Khel provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Mian Khel, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 06:22, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

April 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ghurid dynasty may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• = Leiden, The Netherlands| year = 1999}}</ref> Instead, the consensus in modern scholarship (incl. Morgenstierne, [[Clifford Edmund Bosworth|Bosworth]], [[Louis Dupree (professor)|Dupree]], .<

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:13, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ali Mohammed Khan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• --At length, it unfortunately happened that the Vizier was killed one evening by a random (hot, ill his tent,:---His body was wrapped up in shawls by the attendants, and it was determined,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:34, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Ghurids

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 00:39, 1 May 2014 (UTC)