User talk:Butter and Cream: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
You have been blocked from editing. (TW) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:How about we do what [[User:Titanium_Dragon]] suggested? --[[User:Butter and Cream|Butter and Cream]] ([[User talk:Butter and Cream#top|talk]]) 05:35, 18 October 2014 (UTC) |
:How about we do what [[User:Titanium_Dragon]] suggested? --[[User:Butter and Cream|Butter and Cream]] ([[User talk:Butter and Cream#top|talk]]) 05:35, 18 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
::No. Because he should still be banned from editing the page.—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="Gold">琉竜</font>]]) 05:37, 18 October 2014 (UTC) |
::No. Because he should still be banned from editing the page.—[[User:Ryulong|<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font>]] ([[User talk:Ryulong|<font color="Gold">琉竜</font>]]) 05:37, 18 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
== October 2014 == |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[Image:Stop x nuvola.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon]] You have been '''[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' '''indefinitely''' from editing for acting as a tendentious single-purpose account trying to stir the shit on [[Gamergate controversy]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] first. [[User:Future Perfect at Sunrise|Fut.Perf.]] [[User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise|☼]] 07:23, 18 October 2014 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
Revision as of 07:23, 18 October 2014
Let's do lunch
What a nice username! I suppose our names could form a lovely quartet, but I'm not too familiar with cooking pig and dairy. Definitely not kosher. By any chance did you see my name somewhere and use it for inspiration? I only ask because I saw you are working at the Gamergate article, and that has been mentioned as a contested article at a page or two I follow. Just seemed an odd coincidence. Stay whipped and creamy.Two kinds of porkMakin'Bacon 04:57, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi
Please read WP:STICK before you try to rehash the argument regarding Totillo's statement on Grayson's actions on Kotaku.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 05:10, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- How about we do what User:Titanium_Dragon suggested? --Butter and Cream (talk) 05:35, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- No. Because he should still be banned from editing the page.—Ryūlóng (琉竜) 05:37, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
October 2014
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for acting as a tendentious single-purpose account trying to stir the shit on Gamergate controversy. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:23, 18 October 2014 (UTC)