User talk:Oiboy77/archive1: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
- [[User:MSTCrow|MSTCrow]] 23:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC) |
- [[User:MSTCrow|MSTCrow]] 23:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC) |
||
::There is and was never any evidence that [[User:Smitty Magee]] is using sockpuppets. Unless you have evidence he does the tag stays off. That is vandalism. Prove your case he was/is using sockpuupets and you can put the tag pack without me reverting it.--[[User:Oiboy77|Oiboy77]] 23:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC) |
::There is and was never any evidence that [[User:Smitty Magee]] is using sockpuppets. Unless you have evidence he does the tag stays off. That is vandalism. Prove your case he was/is using sockpuupets and you can put the tag pack without me reverting it.--[[User:Oiboy77|Oiboy77]] 23:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC) |
||
:::There are two sock puppeteer tags. One for ''suspected'' sock puppeteers and one for ''confirmed'' sock puppeteers. Any reversion of the tag is vandalism and will result in a ban. - [[User:MSTCrow|MSTCrow]] 23:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:45, 20 July 2006
|
|---|
| 1 |
Archived instead of deleted
I owe you an apology; you are correct, you archived instead of deleted. Although, this is why edit summaries are useful. -- Avi 20:48, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Humus case
Oiboy77 is not just a vandal. He/she/it is a WP:TROLL. ←Humus sapiens ну? 09:12, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Hi Oiboy77
I'm listed as involved in this - was it you who cited me and if so in what way do you think I relate to it? (I'm glad the problems of POV in this and related articles are being raised.) Thanks. Itsmejudith 11:01, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- I've listing a request to remove humus sapiens administrative powers from wikipedia. Take a look at his edits and reasoning and draw your own conclusion. Feel free to post a statement on the arbitration page. I have no vendetta against him personally but would like to see a NPOV injected into the articles pertaining to the Middle East, and he seems to be a barrier in that process.--Oiboy77 15:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
==Jerusalem==--Oiboy77 23:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC) The capital status of Jerusalem is handled in Jerusalem and Positions on Jerusalem. Asking for a citation in a footnote on the Israel page is nothing more than POV baiting. -- Avi 22:06, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. - MSTCrow 23:35, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- MSTCrow at least sign your stupid block requests. You realy need some help. Can you explain what I "blatantly vandaliszed?"--Oiboy77 23:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- I never used the term "blatantly vandalized," so I am unsure as to what you are quoting. As for your act of vandalism, you removed a sock puppet tag on Smitty's user talk page, which is an act of vandalism. Removing such tags is grounds for a ban. You cannot remove underlying operations tags. There is and was never any evidence that User:Smitty Magee is using sockpuppets. Unless you have evidence he does the tag stays off. That is vandalism.
- MSTCrow 23:39, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- There is and was never any evidence that User:Smitty Magee is using sockpuppets. Unless you have evidence he does the tag stays off. That is vandalism. Prove your case he was/is using sockpuupets and you can put the tag pack without me reverting it.--Oiboy77 23:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
- There are two sock puppeteer tags. One for suspected sock puppeteers and one for confirmed sock puppeteers. Any reversion of the tag is vandalism and will result in a ban. - MSTCrow 23:45, 20 July 2006 (UTC)