User talk:Rama's Arrow: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 01:57, 8 January 2007

This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 15 days are automatically archived to user talk:Rama's Arrow/Archive2006-B. Sections without timestamps are not archived.

User:Rama's Arrow/Hotbox

Picture of the day

A lime is a citrus fruit, which is typically round, lime green in colour, 3–6 centimetres (1.2–2.4 in) in diameter, and contains acidic juice vesicles. There are several species of citrus trees whose fruits are called limes, including the Key lime, Persian lime, kaffir lime, finger lime, blood lime, and desert lime. Limes are a rich source of vitamin C, are sour, and are often used to accent the flavours of foods and beverages. They are grown year-round, originally in tropical South and Southeast Asia but now in much of the world. Plants with fruit called "limes" have diverse genetic origins; limes do not form a monophyletic group. This photograph shows two limes grown in Brazil, one whole and one halved, and was focus-stacked from 23 images.Photograph credit: Ivar Leidus

Archive – More featured pictures...

File:A002 (Small).jpg

Gotta go? Try the oldest toilet in the world! Unfortunately that's all you'll see on a visit to Lothal, which otherwise is host to the oldest-known port in the world. The ASI has buried the rest.

Wikipedia vandalism information
(abuse log)

Low to moderate level of vandalism

[view • purge • update]

3.32 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 17:10, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sikhism

Why did you do this? Respond on my talk. Arrow740 00:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There were no spelling mistakes, and what I wrote is fundamental information about Sikhism. Arrow740 07:19, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back

Hi, how are you? It is nice to see that you have returned. There is a discussion here which you may be interested in about censoring swastikas here. Thanks Gizza^Chat ^© 03:33, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Hinduism-related Collaboration of the week

You have been invited to help improve the article Sita Ram Goel in this weeks's Hinduism collaboration. Please come and help it become a featured-standard article. See also these related articles. [1]

You can also vote for next's week collaboration at the project page: Wikipedia:Hinduism-related Collaboration of the week. Unfortunately, the Collaboration site is little known, that's why the reminder. --Bondego 14:27, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SFD notification

This message is to notify you that a stub template and category that you created ({{Hindu-theo-stub}} and Category:Hindu theology stubs) is up for deletion at WP:SFD. Please join the discussion. Thanks. ~ Amalas rawr ^{=^_^=} 19:54, 5 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Jinnah and Iqbal

Your insistance on keeping your favourite version of the article is proving my theory about "Indian lobby occupying most of Pakistan related articles". This behaviour also proves the facts which I have been adding to Iqbal and you have been vandalizing against. Secondly Indian should be redirected to Indian subcontinent or removed from the both articles. Szhaider 02:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have to tone down a lot. These so-called featured articles are heavily edited by Indians to favour their intentions and agendas which include you too. E.g. Jinnah's article claimed that he supported a secular Pakistan. When I removed this outrageously false claim, it was you who was quick to revert it. Now I have provided solid proofs against your claims and I am waiting for whoever would be shameless enough to revert it. Indian's redirection to disambiguation page is not valid as it does not specifically indicate that the subject of the article lived before the creation of Bhaarat. "Indian" should redirect to "Indian subcontinent". I think you do have to care a lot about it. Szhaider 22:40, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

His complaint has some legitimacy. You should have outsourced your block to another admin even though it was valid. Get some non "Hindu fascists" and non "Indian imperialists" to eview it, or post on ANI.Baka man 01:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 Your insistance on keeping '''your''' favourite version of the article is proving my theory about "Indian lobby occupying most of Pakistan related articles". This behaviour also proves the facts which I have been adding to [[Iqbal]] and you have been vandalizing against. Secondly [[Indian]] should be redirected to [[Indian subcontinent]] or removed from the both articles. [[User:Szhaider|Szhaider]] 02:17, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
 :You have to tone down a lot. These so-called featured articles are heavily edited by Indians to favour their intentions and agendas which include you too. E.g. Jinnah's article claimed that he supported a secular Pakistan. When I removed this outrageously false claim, it was you who was quick to revert it. Now I have provided solid proofs against your claims and I am waiting for whoever would be shameless enough to revert it. [[Indian]]'s redirection to disambiguation page is not valid as it does not specifically indicate that the subject of the article lived before the creation of Bhaarat. "Indian" should redirect to "Indian subcontinent". I think you do have to care a lot about it. [[User:Szhaider|Szhaider]] 22:40, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
+::His complaint has some legitimacy. You should have outsourced your block to another admin even though it was valid. Get some non "Hindu fascists" and non "Indian imperialists" to eview it, or post on ANI.<b>[[User:Bakasuprman|<font color="purple">Baka</font>]][[User talk:Bakasuprman|<font color="red">man</font>]]</b> 01:57, 8 January 2007 (UTC)