User talk:McAnnis59
Welcome
|
Creating talk page
Geology of Grand Canyon region
Starting talk. Working on Geology in Grand Canyon area. McAnnis59 (talk) 03:41, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
McAnnis59, you are invited to the Teahouse!
|
Hi McAnnis59! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:08, 6 April 2020 (UTC) |
Tea house
- Thank you. I can’t wait. Where is it?McAnnis59 (talk) 19:38, 6 April 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Apollo Temple mountain (April 12)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Apollo Temple mountain and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Apollo Temple mountain, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
April 2020
Hello, McAnnis59. I noticed that your recent edit to Sycamore Canyon Wilderness added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil (talk) 21:34, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:COVID-19 pandemic are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:19, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
Notice of ArbCom and Community authorized sanctions
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Please carefully read this information:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
The specific details of these sanctions are described here.
--OhKayeSierra (talk) 19:31, 5 July 2020 (UTC)
See also section
I noticed you added a link to Thunder River in the See also section of Tapeats Creek. Since Thunder River was already linked in the body of the article, it should not be in the See also section. I went ahead and removed it. Thanks for improving the article. MB 15:00, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Apollo Temple mountain
Hello, McAnnis59. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Apollo Temple mountain".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 14:38, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for January 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Isis Temple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capstone. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
New pages
Hi, three recent pages you created list Grand Canyon as the location, when technically they are in Marble Canyon. USGS defines Marble Canyon as: "A canyon of the Colorado River between Glen Canyon and Granite Gorge, heading at the mouth of Paria Canyon at Lees Ferry and trending southwestward and then south to the mouth of the Little Colorado River; in Grand Canyon NP and Kaibab NF."Ron Clausen (talk) 03:56, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks Ron. I will correct. And I obviously really enjoy your work. I spent the entire day with Kwagunt and Malgosa Crest after the Nankoweap Mesa. ( I really got confused for the Tritle vs Brady mess up. Just added a photo to Tritle category- a distance photo profile. It will go in a gallery). Thanks again for correcting me. McAnnis59 (talk) 04:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Howlands Butte, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pennsylvanian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 17 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your work in creating the article about Woolsey Butte. Unfortunately, the article in its current state does not fulfill the notability guideline for geographical features since we need sources that go beyond just a map and data tables. You also need reliable sources for a lot of the text, like the namesake and the geology, to name a few. Since you're still actively working on it, I'm going to put it in the draftspace at Draft:Woolsey Butte for now so you address some of these issues first. ◢ Ganbaruby! (Say hi!) 06:17, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Thanks for your message McAnnis59 (talk) 06:23, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
Category:Grand Canyon, West region has been nominated for discussion
Category:Grand Canyon, West region has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mhockey (talk) 13:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, McAnnis59
Thank you for creating Tuna Canyon.
User:Graeme Bartlett, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
There should be some reference that calls this "Tuna Canyon". Mostly the references just say "Tuna Creek". The geology section is unreferenced.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Graeme Bartlett}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:44, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
Regarding your Pumapunku edit reversal
Hello,
You have reverted a revision on the Pumapunku article, labeling it as fringe, etc.
The revision you have reverted cites published, peer-reviewed research by an international team of researchers affiliated to bona-fide research institutions. The cited research was also able to reproduce the geopolymers in their lab.
I am aware of all the pseudoscience circulating around Pumapunku and other archeological sites in South America but this citation involves serious research.