Jump to content

User talk:LaundryPizza03

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Retinoblastoma (talk | contribs) at 07:37, 12 June 2021 (Removed section I added). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, LaundryPizza03! Thank you for your contributions. I am Babymissfortune and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Happy holidays! Babymissfortune 02:36, 26 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bananana (disambiguation) has been accepted

Bananana (disambiguation), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

 I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 03:17, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fictional rogue planets

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional rogue planets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

We already have Category:Rogue planets in fiction.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —usernamekiran(talk) 00:55, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Puzzled...

... by the meaning of the edit summary of this edit. Can you explain what that means? Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 19:13, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@LaundryPizza03: Anybody home here? - DVdm (talk) 08:56, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I apologize for being silly. It is unlikely that I will do it again. It’s an onomatopoeia for the sound effect of falling into a black hole in Super Mario Galaxy. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 08:59, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I see hear. Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 09:02, 18 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Missing RfD tags on redirects

Please make sure that when you are nominating redirects that you tag the redirects you are nominating with {{Rfd}}. I just fixed 2 redirects you did not tag: [1] and [2]. How to tag redirects for RfD is outlined in step 1 of the name nomination instructions. Steel1943 (talk) 03:00, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Intonjane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Homestead (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was unaware that I was linking to a dab. However, it looks like the correct sense is that mentioned at the top of the page. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 00:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I'm sorry but I think it would be better if you did not use the technical move request for a time. The recent requests you have made such as this one Hebrew language and this one have been completely outside and beyond what is uncontroversial. Is that okay? In ictu oculi (talk) 10:28, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! The Mark Sandler page appears to have text copied word-for-word from this source:

"2014 elevated fellow". IEEE Fellows Directory. {{cite web}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |dead-url= (help)

I'm uncertain if that was actually a copyright violation, because the phrase may be too short to be copyrightable or the page it was copied from may be in the public domain.

--Sir Beluga (talk) 15:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What is for certain is that Earwig turned up nothing. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 17:47, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

fair use rationale fir screenshot

I noticed that you tagged File:Dangerous Curves.jpg for deletion. When you encounter a screenshot with an inadequate fair use rationale, you should consider whether it would be appropriate to add the standard text "for identification of and critical commentary on the television program and its contents" to the rationale rather than tagging it for deletion. I have added the standard rationale and removed the speedy tag. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 20:36, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 4D film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bubble (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Did you catch my reply to your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects#Redirect request: Ministeriidae? 82.9.105.98 (talk) 17:26, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional rogue planets has been nominated for discussion

Category:Fictional rogue planets, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:18, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A brief word

Just a quick word about what notability is – a topic qualifies if it is supported by multiple reliable sources, somewhere in the world. They do not have to be online – a single manuscript copy in a remote monastery could be such a source – and still less do they have to be actually in the article. This matters when considering articles for deletion, as it means we have to make reasonable efforts to check whether sources exist: it is no good just looking at the article. So, a totally unsourced article on a topic that has been extensively written about is notable, while an elegantly sourced piece of puffery about a non-notable book or person might not be. Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:16, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Film adaptation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Total Recall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

T̃ moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, T̃, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster talk 19:13, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: T̃ (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was:
Needs more citations, and clearer context. What sound does this letter produce in IPA?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Teahouse logo
Hello, LaundryPizza03! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 03:35, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Forget it, I'll just redirect this page to Stop squark until an expert can complete this. LaundryPizza03 (talk) 03:24, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your A7 speedy of Phạm Đoan Trang

Hi LaundryPizza03 -- I've declined this deletion request and worked a bit to establish Trang's notability, which now seems fairly clear. It's not required to pop the name into Google before requesting deletion, but can save everyone time where there are many sources readily available in English to support notability, as well as being polite to the original contributor. Espresso Addict (talk) 23:04, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Big Crunch

The diagram, as I understand it, simply represents that the universe can be either expanding or contracting, with the small endpoint being an undifferentiated energy blob, while the large end is a sparse universe. I don't see it immediately obvious that the caption is wrong. Regards Tarl N. (discuss) 02:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit

Hi. I created an edit in terms of show creator, because the concept is actually made by my team, which is Programming Indosiar. We do not have any reliable source, because there is no news coverage that reported our existence - it is a teamwork afterall :) So please advise the solution, because i can guarantee you, my team actually has or owned the concept. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ProgrammingIndosiar (talk • contribs) 10:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Scientists whose names are used as SI units

I would be interested to hear in what way you think this information is indiscriminate. WP:IINFO is focused on excessively long insertions of primary information. This template is a very small, precisely defined group of only twenty members. SpinningSpark 17:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Danger opportunity listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Danger opportunity. Since you had some involvement with the Danger opportunity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:36, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bhojpuri Requires attention

You left this query at the deleted talk page Template talk:Requires attention:

Note to deleting administrator: Do you suppose the Bhojpuri version could also be deleted?

I deleted the English template, but I'm not an admin on that Wiki, and it's up to that community to determine whether they want to keep their template or not. Decisions made on enwiki aren't binding anywhere else. If you want to delete it there, I suggest either finding a Bhojpuri admin, or following whatever process they have for deletions. Thanks  — Amakuru (talk) 08:22, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion nomination of List of tallest buildings in Fuzhou

Never do this without an edit summary. Any editors who had the page watchlisted would not be able to tell that you nominated the page for deletion without looking at it. Thank you, postdlf (talk) 17:30, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KJP1 was:
This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KJP1 (talk) 10:26, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: M22 graph (June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Legacypac was:
Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at M22 graph instead.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Legacypac (talk) 16:46, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paddock (disambiguation), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paddock, Nebraska (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Thittuvilai. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 16:34, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you're going to nominate an article for deletion, it helps to create a discussion page for its deletion.

Also, there are plenty of entries on this list that are not in List of nuclides, so rather than deleting the article, if the page must die, it should be merged. Serendipodous 17:31, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, LaundryPizza03. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spectral gap (physics) has been accepted

Spectral gap (physics), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Gpkp (u • t • c) 16:46, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:John A. Hannah.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:John A. Hannah.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Footnotes in Ulam spiral article

Would you consider describing at Talk:Ulam spiral what sorts of additional footnotes would be helpful? I don't believe there is anything contentious in this article, but if you disagree, please indicate which statements are the problematic ones. Will Orrick (talk) 14:32, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bananaman

I hope you don't mind my additions to your bananaman article. Dwanyewest (talk) 12:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dating of Category:Wikipedia articles that may have off-topic sections

In this edit to {{relevance inline}} you attempted to turn Category:Wikipedia articles that may have off-topic sections into a dated maintenance category, but you didn't do everything that's required for that to work correctly. You'll need to add the appropriate templates to the category page, and create a few more pages those depend on. See Wikipedia:Creating a dated maintenance category for details. Anomie⚔ 13:43, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hadamard matrix

I noticed the explain tag you added to the article. Although it will require some research on my part, I'm willing to have a go at addressing the issue, but I want to make sure I'm clear on what the issue is first. Would it be better to focus on the meaning of the claim, or are you looking for a brief sketch of the proof? Would adding a reference or better wikilinks suffice? Will Orrick (talk) 14:05, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just the definition. It is jargon. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:28, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for clarifying. I have added a definition of the term. Let me know if you think more is needed. Will Orrick (talk) 03:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alleged OR at Planck units

Hello Laundry,

Would you please go to Talk:Planck units and itemize, or at least outline, the specific incidents of OR there? Then the physics community can discuss it and act on it. Thank you. 50.47.109.91 (talk) 05:38, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Also, your signature is using substitution to evade the prohibition against signatures longer than 255 characters; it says at WP:SIGLEN, "The software will automatically truncate both plain and raw signatures to 255 characters of code in the Signature field. If substitution of templates or another page is used, please be careful to verify that your signature does not violate the 255-character length limit when the templates are expanded...."

I was able to construct a signature string for you just under the limit at 253 characters, using HTML5-compliant markup, by using 3-digit colors that match your 6-digit colors almost exactly.

You are encouraged to change

–[[User:LaundryPizza03|'''<font color=#7f7fbf>Laundry</font><font color=#ffbf00>Pizza</font><font color=#bf0000>03</font>''']] ([[User talk:LaundryPizza03|<font color=#00df00>d</font>]][[Special:Contributions/LaundryPizza03|<font color=#00bfff>c&#x0304;</font>]])  : –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄)

to

–[[User:LaundryPizza03|<b style="color:#77b">Laundry</b><b style="color:#fb0">Pizza</b><b style="color:#b00">03</b>]] ([[User talk:LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0d0">d</span>]][[Special:Contribs/LaundryPizza03|<span style="color:#0bf">c̄;</span>]]) : –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄;)

—Anomalocaris (talk) 16:38, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please take care of this now? Most users comply with these requests to bring signatures into compliance. —Anomalocaris (talk) 19:41, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You should have posted this at the bottom, and I have moved this accordingly. But I will comply. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:40, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have changed the signature to exactly what was specified, save for an extraneous semicolon. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:41, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for fixing your signature. Sorry for inserting a stray semicolon, and for any difficulty in finding my previous comment. —Anomalocaris (talk) 17:25, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Akane Yamaguchi

Hello. Help copy edit for article. Thanks you. Cheung2 (talk) 08:00, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Template:Uw-flag1 has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Template:Uw-flag1. Thanks! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 21:25, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Uw-flag1 (July 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
Please discuss at MOS:FLAGICON's talk page whether this would be necessary over uw-mos1
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:13, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Kudpung

Hello, LaundryPizza03. You have new messages at Black Kite's talk page.
Message added 08:24, 28 July 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/MariaJaydHickey

You requested a histmerge in this case. You are not a clerk and it is not your job to request any kind of procedural manipulation of reports at SPI. The merge unfortunately was done, and it will now need to be reversed and the request I made of an SPI clerk, which you could not failed to have seen, will ultimately be done. It has created a lot of unnecessary work for several administrators. Please do not do this again.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:11, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Superlatives galore

In case you weren't watching the page, there was a consensus to "speedy keep" the redirects you nominated here. You can read the other editors' comments for yourself, but as the admin who closed the discussion, I just wanted to point out that you are welcome to resubmit a smaller group or individual nominations for any of these redirects that you do strongly believe are inappropriate. However, any new nominations are not terribly likely to succeed unless you can provide a more convincing argument than just a link to an essay. –Darkwind (talk) 17:07, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Template:Uw-flag1,2,3

Hello. You have three templates that you've submitted to AfC. A reviewer has commented on them, and the same comments are shown in your talk page. What are your plans for these templates? Have you actioned the reviewer's suggestion? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 20:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Uw-flag2 (September 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Gene93k was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: AfC is not the venue for proposed user warning templates. At the very least, establishing new warning templates needs to obtain a consensus of support at the warnings project talk page at WT:UTM.
• Gene93k (talk) 06:47, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Uw-flag3 (September 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Gene93k was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: A user warning template with teeth needs consensus at WT:UTM, otherwise it risks going afoul of CSD#T2 (misrepresentation of Wikipedia policy).
• Gene93k (talk) 06:54, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Template:Uw-flag4 (September 30)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Gene93k was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: A user warning template with teeth needs consensus at WT:UTM, otherwise it risks going afoul of CSD#T2 (misrepresentation of Wikipedia policy).
• Gene93k (talk) 06:55, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bananaman (TV series) has been accepted

Bananaman (TV series), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bkissin (talk) 18:48, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Template:Uw-flag1 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Template:Uw-flag1, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck

豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s

Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはLaundryPizza03たちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 02:39, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

And good luck with school! ミラP 02:39, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Template:Uw-flag1

Hello, LaundryPizza03. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Template:Uw-flag1".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 14:17, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Template:Uw-flag2 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Template:Uw-flag2, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Template:Uw-flag3 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Template:Uw-flag3, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Template:Uw-flag4 concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Template:Uw-flag4, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Email

I got it, will take care now. -- CptViraj (📧) 06:05, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Drmies (talk) 13:07, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Africa is not a country" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Africa is not a country. Since you had some involvement with the Africa is not a country redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes (talk / cont) 03:43, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Template:Uw-flag3

Hello, LaundryPizza03. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Template:Uw-flag3".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 18:22, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Template:Uw-flag2

Hello, LaundryPizza03. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Template:Uw-flag2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Passengerpigeon (talk) 13:27, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Template:Uw-flag4

Hello, LaundryPizza03. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Template:Uw-flag4".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 17:31, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Multi notice links, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Template-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:43, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Cultural insensitivity" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Cultural insensitivity. Since you had some involvement with the Cultural insensitivity redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. signed, Rosguill talk 17:59, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Missing CFR Tags in CFD

Thank you for the nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 May 8#Earthquake magnitude tracking categories. Please be sure to tag the nominated categories with subst:Template:Cfr and ping me if you need assistance. If they are not tagged, the discussion will be closed as a procedural error. RevelationDirect (talk) 09:04, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Overspecialization has been accepted

Overspecialization, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spicy (talk) 01:30, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, LaundryPizza03

Thank you for creating Overspecialization.

User:Spicy, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for writing this article - I was surprised to see that it didn't exist yet. Nice job with the categories, I was really struggling to think of which categories to add before I realized you had already put them in as a comment. When writing about medical content, please keep WP:MEDRS in mind. For major claims like "However, specializing too narrowly leads to poor training; unnecessary health care; low-quality care, especially in regions with poor medical infrastructure; and knowledge that can rapidly become outdated. Overspecialization detracts from physicians' ability to identify and treat problems in patients." we should really be using the best possible sources, i.e. recent review articles and textbooks. It looks like there are a ton of potential MEDRS sources on Pubmed and Google Books, so it should not be hard to improve the "medicine" section. You can also ask for help with this on WP:WikiProject Medicine.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Spicy}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Spicy (talk) 01:37, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AEIOU-TIPS, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ecstasy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"African language (stereotype)" listed at Redirects for discussion

Information icon A discussion is taking place to address the redirect African language (stereotype). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 29#African language (stereotype) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumya-8974 talk contribs subpages 12:03, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

De la lombertie

hey Dreamy Jazz. Can you tag this LTAs userpage, since his account is already locked. thanks. 190.200.226.149 (talk) 12:27, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Behavior abuse

this behavior has been ongoing with several months without people knowing who is abusing it. Pls add this behavior information here [3] that the person was placing oversized image of Osama bin laden on talk page and articles to vandalize (see here [4]) including on some wikiprojects with COVID names. 184.22.70.110 (talk) 10:12, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In pursuant to The News (The Amazing World of Gumball) AfD discussion

Hi LaundryPizza03,

I just wanted to let you know that I will be nominating ALL of the Freelancers television episode articles for deletion in pursuant to the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The News (The Amazing World of Gumball). Feel free to comment in the discussion!

You can see the discussion at: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Video Production Company

Best,

P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 23:03, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cartoon Network: Battle Crashers
added a link pointing to NPC
Three-letter acronym
added a link pointing to IRT

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thanks for making that bulk AfD nomination at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Routine (The Amazing World of Gumball)! P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 16:39, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Heat source" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Heat source. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 13#Heat source until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. --BDD (talk) 20:00, 14 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Music of Polynesia

Good grief... I have had a go at the opening paragraph of Music of Polynesia, which is a start. Thanks for the heads-up! Jon (talk) 02:48, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ESP Guitars

Hello, there seems to be confusion. I did not nominate ESP Guitars for deletion, only category filled with individual pages of guitars. I think if fixed ESP Guitars page itself is ok. Whole category is just like the sales catalogue. Ficadimerda (talk) 13:32, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Berdel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kurdish.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:45, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your input needed

Hi LaundryPizza03, it would be helpful to have your input at Template_talk:Db-meta#T3_and_C1_categories.

If you have a moment, please could you comment there?

Thanks! --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 03:30, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

CFD for neologisms categories

Some of the categories, which you have edited are proposed for renaming. You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 October 4 § Neologisms, words and phases introduced in time periods. —⁠andrybak (talk) 01:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Phosphonium iodide has been accepted

Phosphonium iodide, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Zoozaz1 talk 15:17, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Diphosphorus tetraiodide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sublimation.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Racially motivated emergency calls (October 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AngusWOOF was:
This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Topic is potentially notable, but some of the statements made have an advocacy tone that should be rewritten in neutral tone. Rather than just stating the causes and effects, include the authors and sources that are making those statements.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 15:04, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Template:Fluorides and Template:Fluorine compounds?

Good day Graeme Bartlett, those two templates deliver similar information. Would you think about merging them? -- Ktsquare (talk) 18:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I Can See Your Voice merger proposals

@Hiwilms and LaundryPizza03: Good day. I've left you a message on some ICSYV franchises. If you want to see this, kindly please read carefully before doing this.

Makoy Canlas (talk) 04:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For the record

I didn't create Far future in religion. This guy did, and he's retired. I just text-moved it to reclaim a redirect. You can see the whole mess here. Serendipodous 17:08, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

RFC template / Legobot explanation

The reason you had trouble with Legobot is that it scans for a signature to identify the end of the RFC-body, and it uses the timestamp to decide when the RFC template is "expired". Editing that date could trick Legobot into doing what you want, but that may be considered confusing or misleading to people. There is a better workaround to extend an RFC. If there are multiple timestamps on the same line, Legobot will use the last timestamp. So an explanatory comment (and signature) can be added directly after the original signature.

However extending the duration of this particular RFC probably wouldn't have improved the result. If you want, a new RFC would probably be the better option. Alsee (talk) 11:48, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahajanga, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Malagasy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfD notice

Hi. Please see this AfD following on from the RfC you commented on. Thanks. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 10:52, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for commenting at the recent AfD for the above list. There is now an ongoing discussion around the best way to split the list, if any, if you wish to comment further. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 17:33, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neodymium(III) bromide

Could you help me see what is notable about this chemical? All the refs indicate is that it exists and has various physical properties, as evidenced by database and catalog entries. There's also no evidence that the sock who added the notability tag was doing so in a problematic way. Wasn't blocked at the time, wasn't using multiple accounts on this article, wasn't a part of a pool that disrupted articles, etc. DMacks (talk) 14:36, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

fiction about categories aren't really about those things

Category:Fiction about the Solar System and the rest don't match now. Shouldn't it be "Fiction containing" instead of "fiction about"? Just because something takes place somewhere, doesn't mean its about that at all. Ultima II: The Revenge of the Enchantress is a video game where you briefly visit the worlds in the solar system for a small part of it, it certainly not about the solar system though. The old title name of Category:Solar System in fiction made more sense. Category:Fiction about Algol has the Phantasy Star video games and other things that take place there, but aren't really about it, it just a name of a location. Movies and whatnot are the same, it not about the location. Dream Focus 04:31, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lutetium phthalocyanine has been accepted

Lutetium phthalocyanine, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 16:38, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Use of sources at WP:ELEM

Your input would be appreciated at WT:ELEM § Informal poll 2. Thank you. YBG (talk) 21:28, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Information icon Hello, I'm FilmandTVFan28. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Studio B Productions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. We don't restore vandalism by an unregistered user.Template:Z186 FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 08:57, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also that off topic content about the US and Russia relation was already removed entirely. — FilmandTVFan28 (talk) 09:27, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, we need to hide unattributed copying to Wikipedia, as explained at WP:CWW. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 15:38, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Weinerville, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burnout.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Element colors

Here you mention element category colors i.c.w. WP:A11Y. To me it looks like this is not the subject of the ANI, so I am here to write about the coloring.

1. Of course, current coloring is problematic.

2. Apart from ACCESS, there also plays the question of "what to color" (today it's category, state of matter, occurrence, in a main PT; plus wl-blue).

3. Most complicating is: nine+unk categories to color, which is huge (few degrees of freedom).

Recent months my attention for ELEMENTS was drawn away a bit, but I have put up the frame of "Periodic table graphics", to develop better colors. It's at WP:PTG (Wikipedia:WikiProject Elements/PTG). It has a single talkpage, and is intended to contain (in the object pages) un-signed statements: as a WP page. Also other PT graphics should be cvovered.

It should contain design principles (lots of WP:ACCESS), ELs, refs. Also the talkpage to develop these pages. And more graphic PT topics but category colors. That's all ;-)

With that, we can redesign these colors. (btw, "pastels" might solve a lot, but imo they are not expressive enough to make the cell-to-legend-or-vv recognition). -DePiep (talk) 00:11, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So, my question is, what do you think? WP:PTG. Setup, go live at WP:ELEM, design! ? -DePiep (talk) 01:12, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, but it needs updating for the recent decision to adopt the 2010 category scheme with no unknown category. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 10:25, 3 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi, Your edits like [5] have caused lots of trouble here. To be clear: I am working blisters on my fingers to give us a sound base for the color development. At least, I'd prefer if you make contact about planned changes. (Working simultaneously on the same template set will never work). Second, I'd like you to communicate about your wishes in this. (btrw, I'll revert the categorisation) as it breaks templates. -DePiep (talk) 19:22, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry about that. I should have used <noinclude> markup for the templates. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 19:31, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you share your plans? Engage in a question-answer-style of cooperation? -DePiep (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fermi paradox, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tipping point.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Our major PTG approach

Hi LP03, I appreciate your involvement with WP:PTG. I am here to ask on "How shall we proceed?"

The bad cat colors are an old trouble, though I/we never took the time to attack it thoroughly. For me, that is because the requirements & issues & problems are huuuge. Multiple disciplines A11Y, W3C, CB-colorblindness), few degrees of freedom -- having 10 categories, etc. (Of course the right reply here is: stop doing it on you own! This is WP!).

For the technical stuff, we can find solutions like templates & processes (checking CB?).

My question in general is: how do we bring the PTG into strong solutions? Not just these "2020" colors (difficult by themselves enough), but also inspiring other wikis to follow us! Creating a color set that serves CB! Setting an i18n standard! For this, we need to have good and strong (color) design guidance & checks.

To be clear:

  • How and when shall we go public with PTG (=to WT:ELEM), and create a formal Task Force? (one or two weeks?)
  • How do we develop and discuss proposals? For example, I have design ideas myself, so how & where do we cheCk&discuss those?
  • What do we need to make it great? Like, external websites, othEr checks (quantitative, qualitative), Webdevelopers-help (invite Wikimedia designers?).

Details, about individual sets, we can talk about elsewhere. This is about the grand PTG route. Talks can be here, at my Talk, and preferably at WT:PTG of course.


Have a nice edit, -DePiep (talk) 21:54, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category creation

Hi, I see you have created and populated Category:Materials that expand upon freezing (8). However, maybe the topic is not fit for Categorisation. WP:NONDEFINING describes that non-defining characteristics are not to be used for categorisation. Please consider this when creating more new categories. Also, this category might be proposed for deletion by some editor. -DePiep (talk) 17:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Lists of astronomical locations in fiction has been nominated for renaming

Category:Lists of astronomical locations in fiction has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 01:57, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Series of works

Do you plan to nominate any of the other terms for series of works for AFD? Template:Works series. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 17:53, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Squat categories

Hiya I'm getting a flurry of notifications about deletion of squatting categories, could I ask you to pause and I'll reply after I'm done with what I'm doing? I'm asking because otherwise there'll be a lot of repetition in the answers. Thanks! Mujinga (talk) 12:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

But there's only a few left to go through. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 12:57, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dual photon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Orbital angular momentum.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Racially motivated emergency calls

Information icon Hello, LaundryPizza03. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Racially motivated emergency calls, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New CSD for mass-created articles

Agree that this should be a criteria for speedy deletion. Wording might be "Mass-created article made without first seeking consensus per WP:MASSCREATION". Let me know if you start an RFC or whatever to do this and I'll support. I also think mass-creation needs to be something flagged up at NPP so it can be stopped early (e.g., more than 25 creations in 24 hours? 50 creations in 24 hours?) as the later intervention comes the worse the clean-up task is, and should be flagged even for autopatrolled users, not least because it might be a hack/vandalism. FOARP (talk) 09:35, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@FOARP: Proposed wording:

This applies to books, content categories, files uploaded locally, mainspace editnotices, portals, and articles which make no credible claim of significance, that were mass-created by an automated or semi-automated process without community discussion or against consensus, and which have no substantial edits beyond creation.

Any revisions before I share my proposal at WT:CSD? –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:52, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Frankly I'd drop the "automated or semi-automated" bit. The link to "Mass-created" anyway gets into what that means, and you see people saying "I wasn't using any tools! I was just laboriously typing everything out and creating articles every 90 seconds that way!", which ultimately shouldn't make any difference (per WP:MEATBOT) anyway. FOARP (talk) 08:15, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Projectile motion, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Acceleration due to gravity and Closed form.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Yes I saw that you were renaming "category:such-and-such animal idioms" to "metaphors. Yes this is good, I made the categories but then I saw some were "idioms" and some were "metaphors" and that's not excellent, but then I forgot it. So... thanks! Appreciated. Herostratus (talk) 23:40, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your proposal, not a problem

Hi LaundryPizza03, I was one of the people who voted against your deletion proposal on WP:CfD. You got a lot of... negativity in the responses so I wanted to come by and say that that was not my reaction. I learned about your proposal from you, when you notified us on WikiProject:Horticulture (and I assume you did the same on a hundred other pages), so obviously there was nothing nefarious about it. You suggested it, we voted against it, nothing went wrong. (I replied saying I was voting against a "good faith stupid mistake." I hope that phrasing isn't a problem. Someone said that was uncivil, that I should not call you stupid. I had written that assuming you would understand what I really meant and that I was deescalating the comments. Hopefully you got that as it was meant. If not I can edit the comment.) It wasn't a big deal. An editor going through pages/cats and having opinions about them, sometimes wanting to delete them is what we all do every day... Invasive Spices (talk) 18:13, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for creation posts

Hello, I saw your posts at WP:AFC/RC, but I was curious why you don't just create these as an auto-confirmed editor in good standing. Looks like you have created other categories as well. I have no issues with the requests; just curious. -2pou (talk) 22:33, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Just felt strapped for time. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:34, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

june

you're missing a banner for "This user has Autism"

it's already there nvm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Julius503 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LaundryPizza03&oldid=1028160436"