Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Œīîto

Œīîto

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable translator. Can't find a single thing about him. Do not send to draft unless encyclopaedic merit can be proved. Fails WP:BIO and WP:GNG as far as I can tell from a WP:BEFORE search. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:57, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG and BIO --Assyrtiko (talk) 10:02, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. No indication of notability. fails WP:GNG. DJRSD (talk) 10:08, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete per criterion A7. An article with this content, by the same creator, has already been deleted at Ñósíït and Draft:Ñósíït; at this point it is pure disruption. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 10:11, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete: Clear A7. Java Hurricane 10:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The creator of this page has been creating articles about unnotable topics. —hueman1 (talk • contributions) 10:21, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Lacks notability, likely a hoax? Fixing26 (talk) 14:35, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - I agree with CSD A7 as well. A S U K I T E 15:33, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I found this via Special:NewPagesFeed, and was about to tag as A7 until I saw this AfD. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 16:18, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as likely hoax. I can't find any info about this person at all. The reference doesn't add up as well. --Lenticel ^(talk) 13:08, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I investigated the book listed as a reference after I posted above, but I didn't bother posting about it since consensus is clear enough. The Philippine Bible Society is a legitimate organization that publishes Bibles in the Philippines, and the ISBN is in the proper format for books published in the Philippines, but the specific book claimed as a source doesn't appear to exist, by that title or with that ISBN. 50.248.234.77 (talk) 01:09, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]